The hate that dare not speak its name

December 23, 2001

A TORRENT OF ATTACKS

There has been a torrent of attacks on Israel in the French and British media following Barbara Amiel's article. (Amiel's article can be found in the dispatch Renewed anti-Semitism in England since Sept. 11 (December 18, 2001).)

A single article in the Independent of London, for example, said the ambassador was right and went on to describe Israel as a "shitty little country" FOUR times.

Here, by contrast, is an article attacking British anti-Semitism, by the American-based British non-Jewish writer Andrew Sullivan.

-- Tom Gross


SPREADING THE GREATER LIE ABOUT ISRAEL

Spreading the greater lie about Israel
By Andrew Sullivan
The Sunday Times of London
December 23, 2001

www.sunday-times.co.uk/article/0,,9002-2001593349,00.html

A gaffe is perhaps best described as what happens when a politician accidentally tells the truth. Among professional practitioners of the political arts this doesn't occur too often. But every now and then the truth emerges.

So God bless the French ambassador. All he was saying is what many also privately believe. That "shitty little country", Israel, has become, among many European elites, the object of hate that dare not speak its name.

I'm not talking merely about editorials that seem to deny the right of Jews to emigrate to Israel; or leaders that come close to blaming Israel itself for the mass murder of its own citizens by Hamas terrorists.

It is simply routine at this point to see "balanced" news reports from the BBC and the broadsheet British press that morally equate the actions of Israeli self-defence with the deliberate murder of civilian Jews by Palestinian terrorists.

While Britain and America are allowed to fight a war against terrorism, Israel is urged to practice self-restraint every time another terrorist massacres another group of civilians in a restaurant or disco.

Supporting Israel as a matter of right versus wrong is almost unheard of in polite society. In normal times, this is lamentable but not disastrous. The Jews know something about survival. They can and will defend themselves.

But in abnormal times, when anti-semitism is spreading across the globe like a brushfire, it is deeply dangerous. Not since the 1930s has such blithe hatred of Jews gained this much acceptability in world opinion.

Across the Arab world, in particular, the past decade or so has seen a shift from mere passive resentment of Jews to a paranoid anti-semitism.

That European elites want to ignore it, or worse pander to it, suggests we have learnt nothing from history.

Am I exaggerating? I wish I were.

The massacre of September 11 has merely exposed and accelerated this trend.

In the aftermath, a Gallup poll of Pakistanis found 48% believing that the Jews actually flew the planes into the World Trade Center, after warning their compatriots to stay away.

This unhinged lie was routinely reproduced in dozens of Middle Eastern newspapers and remains the biggest single obstacle to getting Arabs and Muslims to acknowledge Osama Bin Laden's guilt.

Al-Ahram, Egypt's biggest newspaper and the official mouthpiece of the government, controlled by President Hosni Mubarak, recently published a particular gem as a compilation of the "investigative work of four reporters on Jewish control of the world". It stated that: "Jews have become the political decision-makers and control the media in most capitals of the world (Washington, Paris, London, Berlin, Athens, Ankara)." It claimed: "The main apparatus for the Jews to control the world is the international Jewish lobby, which works for Israel."

Or take the official "moderates". Consider the view of the former imam of New York's Islamic Cultural Center, a man described until a short time ago as a western-leaning mullah sent to New York to spread inter-faith understanding. After September 11, he disappeared and then popped up in the Middle East with the following statement: "You see these people (the Jews) all the time everywhere, disseminating corruption, heresy, homosexuality, alcoholism and drugs. They do this to impose their hegemony and colonialism on the world. Now, they are riding on the back of the world powers."

Then there's the Palestinian Authority newspaper Al-Hayat Al-Jadeeda: the Muslim-Jewish conflict "resembles the conflict between man and Satan... this is the fate of the Muslim nation, and beyond that the fate of all the nations of the world, to be tormented by this nation (the Jews)". Replace the word Muslim with German and you don't have an approximation of Hitler. You have Hitler.

Here's one fact, reported earlier this autumn by Agence France-Presse: Mein Kampf was recently as high as No 6 on the Palestinian bestseller list.

Last week, Reuters ran a photograph that was barely picked up elsewhere. It was a picture of Hezbollah youth brigades gathered in a square and all performing the Nazi salute. If that picture had shown American children doing the same, don't you think it would have been splashed on every front page in the world?

In fact, it is a function of condescending racism to the Arabs that we believe this kind of hate-filled pathology is somehow normal for them. The left is particularly complicit in this evil.

Many western liberals chided America for withdrawing from the Durban conference on racism last August. But that conference was the latest high-water mark for Jew-hating.

The infamous, fabricated tract, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, was widely distributed at the meeting. Questioners were shouted down with cries of "Jew! Jew! Jew!"

The Palestinian Authority refuses to include the fact of the Holocaust in its own history books. What about the following statement by one Ali 'Aqleh 'Ursan: "The covetous, racist, and hated Jew Shylock, who cut the flesh from Antonio's chest with the knife of hatred, invades you with his money, his modern airplanes, his missiles, and his nuclear bombs."

Is 'Ursan some fringe extremist? No, he's the chairman of the Arab Writers' Association. There are, of course, completely legitimate criticisms of Israel and Israeli policy that have nothing to do with anti-semitism. The settlements policy of the prime minister, Ariel Sharon, is extremely hard to justify. There are Jewish extremists as well; and there is brutality in Israel's conduct in the West Bank and Gaza that deserves rebuke.

But these valid arguments are light years away from the Jew- hating that has been fomented by Arab governments for years and tolerated by western elites for far too long.

Such anti-semitism is the fundamental reason why no peace is possible in the Middle East, because it has so infected every possible Arab interlocutor that Israel simply has nobody to make peace with.

In fact, unless western governments expose and condemn such anti-semitism no peace will ever be possible.

And the minute real pressure is put on the Palestinians by the West, we get results.

Hamas's temporary cessation of suicide bombings in Israel last week is directly related to the Bush administration's clear backing for Israel after the latest terrorist wave.

Appeasement is not necessary for peace. In fact, it perpetuates war. Do we remember anything?

Sixty years ago such hatred of Jews unchallenged, appeased, excused, ignored led directly to Auschwitz. Its prevalence now in the Middle East should remove any doubt about the morality of Israel's self-defence in these perilous times and shame anyone who trafficks in it.

Yes, this means that Israel's war against terrorism is the same as our war against terrorism.

And, yes, it is good versus evil all over again.

How much more do we need to know about the nature of Israel's enemies to know whose side we should truly be on?


All notes and summaries copyright © Tom Gross. All rights reserved.