'NY Times called Isaac Bashevis Singer a Polish writer. Wikipedia made him Jewish again'

June 10, 2021

THE STRUGGLES OVER WIKIPEDIA ENTRIES

[Notes by Tom Gross]

Those, like me, who have enjoyed the novels of Isaac Bashevis Singer, may find the article below interesting, as will those who follow the political wars continuing over thousands of other Wikipedia entries.

The struggle over the Wikipedia entry on Singer ? the only Yiddish-language author to win the Nobel Prize for literature ? came to wider notice after the New York Times apparently used Wikipedia as a source on Singer in April, and removed reference to the fact he was Jewish. This has since been restored on Wikipedia.

Singer was intensely Jewish, both in his life and literature. He escaped Europe in 1935 as the Nazis introduced further antisemitic measures. His father was a Hasidic rabbi and his mother, Bathsheba, was the daughter of the rabbi of Biłgoraj, the shtetl where Singer spent part of his youth.

 

REMOVING JEWISH HISTORY AND VICTIMS

There are many entries on Wikipedia, including the one about Horochov (or Gorokhov), the Polish shtetl where my grandfather (Abraham Gross) was born and grew up, where almost all Jewish (and in this case also Polish) references have been removed in concerted campaigns by Ukrainian nationalists to rewrite history.

Here is the Wikipedia entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horokhiv

The parts about the Jewish (and Polish) history and the ghetto, and the references to Yad Vashem as a source, have been removed.

Horochov had a majority Jewish population for most of its history, and was 70 percent Jewish in 1940, almost all the remaining residents being Poles.

The Jews were killed en masse by the Germans and Ukrainians, and the territory was then occupied by Ukraine, the Poles were expelled, Ukrainians moved in, and towns including this one were renamed.

There were 5,000 Jews in Horochov in 1940 and only a handful survived the Holocaust, including Charlene Schiff (Shulamit Perlmutter), who hid alone aged 12-14 in the forests outside Horochov, eating wild fruits and insects.

The Washington Post ran an obituary of her here in 2013:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/charlene-schiff-holocaust-survivor-dies-at-83/2013/03/16/4b9674e8-89d5-11e2-a051-6810d606108d_story.html

 

RENIA'S DIARY

Similarly, other east European nationalists have sought to remove or downplay Jewish history.

As Asaf Shalev notes in his article below, the dispute over the Isaac Bashevis Singer entry is not the only time Wikipedian Oliver Szydlowski (who was awarded the "Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 1st Class" by something called "WikiProject Poland") has insisted on striking "Jewish" from the first sentence of Wikipedia articles on notable Polish Jews.

In 2019, for example, he became embroiled in an argument with other Wikipedians over Renia Spiegel, a teenage Holocaust victim whose diary has been compared to that of Anne Frank. After a great deal of effort, Wikipedia overrode Szydlowski and other Polish nationalists and noted that Spiegel, who was executed because she was Jewish in the Przemyśl ghetto at the age of 18, on July 30, 1942, was Jewish.

 

FABRICATING CHRISTIAN* VICTIMS OF GAS CHAMBERS

In 2019, I posted this dispatch (Poland's fabricated death camp: Wikipedia's longest hoax, exposed), which includes a photo of a church memorial plaque commemorating "200,000 Polish Christian victims" who Polish ultra-nationalists wrongly claim were gassed to death in an "extermination camp" in Warsaw that never actually existed. They made-up entries and references on Wikipedia about it.

It's an invented camp, "it's fake history," part of a Polish nationalist campaign to try and distort the Holocaust and pretend Jews were not its overwhelmingly central victims, Prof. Havi Dreifuss, a leading Holocaust expert at Yad Vashem said.

As I noted in my 2019 dispatch:

It is only one part of a systematic effort by Polish nationalists to whitewash hundreds of Wikipedia articles relating to Poland and the Holocaust and parrots the revised historical narrative currently being enacted by the Polish government to cover up Polish cooperation and collaboration with the Nazi murder of Jews.

Among Wikipedia entries in Polish that have been rewritten to pretend the Germans rather than Poles were responsible for mass murders of Jewish civilians, are the July 1941 pogroms at Radzilow (where Poles rounded up hundreds of their Jewish neighbors, barricaded them in a barn and set it on fire) and the Polish massacre of Jews at Jedwabne.

In 2009, WikiLeaks (which is not connected to Wikipedia) released a batch of emails revealing the existence of a group of Wikipedia editors from Ukraine, the Baltic states and Poland, that were coordinating their actions and working together to skew content there to push a nationalistic line with fake history.

(* The vast majority of the victims of Nazi gas chambers were Jewish, but some were Christians. For example, some among the 19,000 Roma who were killed in gas chambers at Auschwitz, were Christian. Soviet prisoners of war and others were murdered by the Nazis en masse, but not generally in gas chambers.)


ARTICLE

THE NEW YORK TIMES CALLED ISAAC BASHEVIS SINGER A POLISH WRITER. HERE'S HOW WIKIPEDIA WARRIORS MADE HIM JEWISH AGAIN.

The New York Times called Isaac Bashevis Singer a Polish writer. Here's how Wikipedia warriors made him Jewish again.
By Asaf Shalev
JTA
June 4, 2021

https://www.jta.org/2021/06/04/culture/the-new-york-times-called-isaac-bashevis-singer-a-polish-writer-heres-how-wikipedia-warriors-made-him-jewish-again

Few things rile an online crowd like a mistake in The New York Times. One example is the Twitter account of a contemptuous troll dedicated to pointing out typos and grammar mistakes in the paper of record.

But there's another category of error ? the botching of a fraught historical detail ? that elicits a special shock and insult.

In April, novelist Sigrid Nunez, writing an essay about unexpected bonds between strangers in the Times' style magazine, was found to have committed such a violation. She described, in passing, Isaac Bashevis Singer as a "Polish-American author."

The various reactions featured words like "yikes," "obscene," "disgusting," aghast" and "shanda."

"Shame on @NYTIMES for erasing his identity and heritage," one Twitter user wrote.

It may be true that the Nobel laureate was born and raised in Poland, but Singer is, in fact, best described as a Jewish author, and any labeling that elevates the former while ignoring the latter will strike many Jews as tone-deaf at best. This sensitivity is understandable given that Singer's hyphenated identities are the result of his immigration to the United States only a few years before the near annihilation of Polish Jewry.

Since Nunez surely didn't mean to bring about a crime against history, the question is where did she pick up the wording that appeared in The Times?

The likely answer is quite obvious: Wikipedia.

At the time, the introduction to the Wikipedia entry on Singer described him as a "Polish American writer in Yiddish." The word "Jewish" appeared lower, in the body of the text.

Check now and you'll see a different first line: Singer is "a Polish-born Jewish-American writer." But the process of editing these few words was long and complicated, offering lessons on the pitfalls and continued promise of decentralized knowledge in the era of disinformation, with some possible insights about Polish ultranationalism.

The story of how a set of Wikipedia warriors made Isaac Bashevis Singer Jewish again starts a few years ago with a keyboard battle between two strong-willed strangers on the internet.

On one side: Wikipedia novice David Stromberg, 40, an Israel-born, U.S.-raised literary scholar and writer who lives in Jerusalem and whose research on Singer appears in academic journals.

"I've been in this battle since 2019, have gotten really obsessed with it," he told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. "You ask yourself, 'how could this be happening?'"

On the other side: seasoned Wikipedian Oliver Szydlowski, 22, a Polish college student enrolled in a construction management program at the Queensland University of Technology in Brisbane, Australia.

"Wikipedia is a battleground, and you do tend to argue with a lot of people," Szydlowski told JTA. "What I'm trying to do is to improve every single article as much as possible."

At first, Stromberg found himself consulting the Wikipedia page on Singer for work. He's a serious Singer scholar, but the page provided a quick and easy reference for certain details, like the listing of Singer's published works.

There were little mistakes in dates and titles, and Stromberg fixed them as he went along. Then one day, he noticed Singer was identified as a "Polish American," so he fixed that, too.

"And within like an hour it was back," Stromberg recalled. "So I went and changed it again. And again it was back."

Stromberg navigated to the backend of the page and searched for who was making the changes. It was a user that went by the Polish-sounding "Oliszydlowski." A user page for Oliszydlowski seemed to hint at the motivation of Stromberg's adversary. The page showed that Oliszydlowski was awarded the Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 1st Class by something called WikiProject Poland for having created an article on Polonophilia, which means fondness for Polish culture and history.

To Stromberg, Szydlowski's Wikipedia profile suggested that he might belong to the movement of Polish ultranationalists who have been fighting to improve the world's perception of Poland's 20th-century history. The sanitized narrative advanced by this movement is that the Polish people bear no responsibility for the Holocaust and were themselves victims of the Nazis.

As the back-and-forth over the Singer article continued, Szydlowski's track record as an editor and knowledge of the Wikipedia rules allowed him to trump Stromberg's corrections. The Wikipedia administrators who got involved sided with Szydlowski.

Eventually Stromberg's account was blocked. He had picked the username IBSLiteraryTrust, after the Isaac Bashevis Singer Literary Trust, which he represents. It was a bad choice ? Wikipedia frowns on anything that looks like promotional activity by a business or organization.

Stromberg occasionally felt silly about continuing to fight and thought of letting the error stand, hoping that internet users would know better than to trust Wikipedia. But he also knew that Wikipedia is widely read and worried that the idea of Singer being a Polish American could enter the wider culture ? the kind of scenario that eventually happened with the phrase's appearance in The Times.

So Stromberg fought on. He pleaded to have his account unblocked.

"I have been put here in order to stop a clarification that is scholarly in nature and has nothing to do with promotion or sales," Stromberg wrote as part of a Wikipedia grievance process in November. "User Oliszydlowski is constantly undermining these changes and using all kinds of Wikipedia tricks to block my access. Please help!!"

Oliszydlowski, meanwhile, chimed in to say he merely hoped to enforce Wikipedia's rules. According to his understanding, the descriptor "Jewish" didn't belong in the lead sentence. Only a person's nationality ? rather than religion or ethnicity ? is allowed in the lead, and Jewish is not a nationality, he argued.

Stromberg countered by giving the example of articles on important figures whose lead sentence did say "Jewish," like Walter Benjamin, Martin Buber and Shalom Shabazi. And he added that according to Wikipedia itself, Jewish can, in fact, be considered a nationality.

"The Wikipedia entry on 'Jewish' clearly frames being Jewish as an ethnoreligious group and a nation, and states that 'Jewish ethnicity, nationhood, and religion are strongly interrelated,'" Stromberg wrote.

Oliszydlowski's repeated rejections, Stromberg wrote, suggested "national belligerence."

Nothing worked. Stromberg kept posting the wrong answers from the wrong accounts at the wrong moments and was rebuffed each time. He decided to give up.

"The administrators on Wikipedia were not interested in upholding what might be factual information," Stromberg said in a recent interview. "Their main concern was that people should play by their rules. To me, that kind of game is not a game worth playing."

Then he reconsidered.

"It's not a game worth playing alone," he said.

In the 20 years since it was launched, Wikipedia has proven remarkably resilient. Run by a nonprofit and edited by anyone with an internet connection who would like to volunteer, the site turned out to be reliable in defiance of its early critics while standing as the only noncommercial entity among the most popular websites on the internet. Wikipedia has become a part of the digital infrastructure.

Corporate propaganda and political agendas always made the job of Wikipedia difficult, but with the rise of state-sponsored, social media-powered disinformation, the Wikipedia community has struggled to fend off rogue editors and bad-faith revisions. When fighting breaks out in Gaza, for example, mobs wage war over related Wikipedia pages and administrators are forced to freeze editing. Meanwhile, the entry for the Second Intifada, which ended more than 15 years ago, is still being litigated.

The battle over Singer's identity didn't erupt in quite that way, but a small crowd did coalesce after the article in The Times was published. Stromberg recruited help through Facebook; others came from Twitter. Someone would edit the first line to add the word Jewish, and Oliszydlowski would immediately undo it, adding comments that grew increasingly impatient and acerbic ? for example: "Disruptive vandalism" and "No such nationality as Jewish. How hard is that to comprehend[?]"

An Israeli Wikipedia administrator named Amir Aharoni joined the challengers as the matter went into a dispute resolution process.

Aharoni wanted the word "Jewish" added "somewhere, anywhere, in the first, all-important sentence" of the Singer article, but with his more than 15 years of experience editing Wikipedia ? and sorting through countless such disputes as an administrator ? Aharoni also felt a responsibility to keep the debate civil.

"With sensitive things like the nationality of famous people, and especially Jews, of course, it's better to be careful and not fight with other editors," Aharoni told JTA.

(Aharoni, who is an employee of the site's operator, the Wikimedia Foundation, said he edits Wikipedia as a volunteer, and that the two functions are independent of each other.)

Rather than argue against Singer's Polishness, Aharoni emphasized his Jewishness by citing sources like newspaper accounts and the Nobel Committee's summary of Singer's accomplishment.

To Oliszydlowski's point that ethnicity and religion don't belong in the first line, Aharoni noted the Wikipedia Manual of Style, which says that ethnicity and religion do belong if they are "relevant to the subject's notability."

The final decision, based on a consensus, excluding Oliszydlowski, was to identify Singer in his entry's first sentence as Jewish, not Polish.

"There was a bit of an argument," Aharoni said, "but it was small compared to many other arguments that happen in Wikipedia."

A few weeks later, Szydlowski agreed to an interview with JTA. He didn't sound exactly like the Polish propagandist that Stromberg suspected him of being.

Logging in from Australia, where he is finishing up a bachelor's degree in construction management and urban development, Szydlowski said he still thinks it's correct to refer to Singer as a Pole but has accepted the community's decision.

"Me, personally, I don't really have an opinion," he said. "If they concluded that he should be described as this or that does not matter just as long as it's correct within the Wikipedia guidelines. Really, I'm very neutral in this perspective in this dispute. I'm satisfied now that it has actually been discussed."

His argument was that Singer was not only Polish by nationality but that the country played a significant role in his life and career. Singer left Poland when he was in his 30s, Szydlowski noted, having already begun his career as a writer. And the literature he produced examined not just any Jews but Jews in Poland.

Szydlowski doesn't deny Singer's Jewishness and, in fact, is something of a Judeophile. He talked about the richness of prewar Ashkenazi culture in Europe and recited statistics on the historical size of the Jewish population of different cities. His user profile says he has Ashkenazi heritage. Asked about that, Szydlowski shared that his great-grandfather was Jewish and survived the war by concealing his identity.

"I love researching Jewish topics, and I love comparing what Polish and Ashkenazi Jewish cultures were like because the mutual influence was unbelievable," Szydlowski said.

The Singer dispute is not the only time Szydlowski has insisted on striking "Jewish" from the first sentence of Wikipedia articles on notable Polish Jews. In 2019, for example, he became embroiled in an argument with other Wikipedians over Renia Spiegel, a Holocaust victim whose diary has been compared to that of Anne Frank.

The nerdy-scholastic confidence of Szydlowski appears to have been shaped by years as a volunteer on Wikipedia. Starting as a young teenager, he admittedly had "no knowledge, no experience" and focused on fixing typos and grammatical errors or adding references.

Szydlowski eventually became involved in a group known as WikiProject Poland, one of more than 2,000 such collaborations on English Wikipedia alone. Each country has its own WikiProject with the goal to create standard language, improve the quality of related articles and generate new content. The 170 or so members of the Poland team help maintain tens of thousands of articles.

"It's very difficult to say why I do it," Szydlowski said. "I really enjoy it. I enjoy writing about history and reading about it."

Asked about Stromberg's suspicion that he's a Polish nationalist harboring a certain agenda, Szydlowski denied the assertion. He said that as an editor his job is to enforce Wikipedia's rule against personal points of view, which includes nationalism.

"I understand where [Stromberg is] coming from because there is a lot of nationalism on Wikipedia," Szydlowski said. "It is a battleground, but what he's saying ? no, it's not true."

Stromberg said that Szydlowski's denial belies the record of his actions ? his insistence and persistence up until the point that other Wikipedians got involved and an arbitration mechanism was imposed.

"What's a college student in Australia doing working overtime on the WikiProject Poland?" Stromberg asked. "Would a troll reveal that he's a troll?"

 

* You can also find other items that are not in these dispatches if you ?like? this page on Facebook www.facebook.com/TomGrossMedia

All notes and summaries copyright © Tom Gross. All rights reserved.