Tom Gross Mideast Media Analysis

Israel warns that foreign reporters’ vehicles might be being used by terrorists

September 28, 2006

* Hamas, the Palestinian governing party, continue to kidnap, beat up moderate Palestinian journalists. International journalists organizations strangely silent

 

CONTENTS

1. “How the Guardian lied about me and refused to print a correction”
2. Al-Jazeera praised “for helping the fight against U.S.”
3. “The propagandists have taken over AP”
4. Foreign reporters’ vehicles “may be used by terrorists”
5. Gunmen kidnap Palestinian journalist
6. Terrorists attack Palestinian news agency in Gaza
7. Palestinians plan and train for more kidnappings
8. Daily Telegraph: Palestinians arming to copy “Hizbullah’s success”
9. “Does AP stand for al-Qaeda Propaganda?” (Boston Herald, Sept. 24, 2006)
10. “The Guardian at the crossroads” (By Alan Dershowitz, J. Post, Sept. 27, 2006)



[Note by Tom Gross]

This dispatch concerns allegations that the relationship between some western journalists, and Palestinian and Iraqi terrorist groups is much too close for comfort. Before that, I attach an extract from an article about The Guardian by Alan Dershowitz, who is a subscriber to this list.

“HOW THE GUARDIAN LIED ABOUT ME AND REFUSED TO PRINT A CORRECTION”

The following are extracts from Alan Dershowitz’s op-ed in the Jerusalem Post titled “‘The Guardian’ at the crossroads.”

“… Recently, The Guardian published an op-ed devoted to an article I had written. The writer (Henry Porter) turned virtually everything I had argued on its head… I was compelled to write a letter to the editor correcting the many inaccuracies and pointing out the inappropriate ad hominem attack on my appearance [The Guardian had also attacked the way Dershowitz looks.] The Guardian refused to print my letter.

[Turning to another article written about him in The Guardian, Dershowitz continues] the reviewer (Louise Christian) simply lied about what was in my book. She made things up. She said the book was about something it wasn’t about. She said I took positions when I explicitly wrote the opposite in my book. Why would a book reviewer go to such great lengths to defame me and to falsify what I wrote? After all, I am a liberal Democrat and have spent my career as a law professor, author, and defense lawyer fighting for civil liberties and the rights of the accused… One would think that these credentials and this topic would endear me to the Guardian.

… had Christian read the book, she would know that I opposed the war in Iraq. She apparently assumed that because I support Israel’s right to exist, I also supported America’s war in Iraq. It’s a telling assumption.

[On another issue] How on Earth could Christian transform my strong opposition to using chromosomes as criminal predictors to support? She simply reversed my position. This cannot be a simple mistake. It is plainly a willful deception of her readers.

… When I wrote a letter to the editor refuting Christian’s blatant lies, Alan Rusbridger, editor of The Guardian, responded that he could not publish my letter… It would be unthinkable for an American or Israeli newspaper to publish a full-blown attack on an individual without at least extending the right to reply in the letters page. The Guardian did precisely that to me, and twice in a single summer…”

The full article, which I recommend you to read if you have time, is attached at the end of this dispatch.

AL-JAZEERA PRAISED “FOR HELPING THE FIGHT AGAINST U.S.”

In an audio-message posted on the Internet on Sunday, the leader of one of Iraq’s major insurgent groups, the “Islamic Army in Iraq,” has praised the Qatar-based TV channel al-Jazeera for playing what he calls “an important and positive role in the fight against the U.S.”

The Islamic Army in Iraq consists of former members of Saddam Hussein’s Ba’ath Party, as well as intelligence and army officers from Saddam’s regime. It is believed to be responsible for several murderous attacks against Iraqi Shi’ites and for the kidnapping in 2005 of Italian journalist Giulian Sgrena. (Sgrena, the correspondent for the Italian communist daily Il Manifesto, was freed after a month with the help and mediation of two Italian intelligence officers. After her release, as you may recall, on their way to Baghdad’s airport Sgrena and the officers came under fire from U.S. forces which failed to identify their car. One of the Italian officers was killed and the incident caused an international outcry.)

The audio message by The Islamic Army also accused the Iraqi government’s al-Iraqiya TV of having the “worst” news coverage about Iraq. It said its broadcasts were “lies and sheer delusion,” and that government officials interviewed on it were “agents and stooges” of the United States who had “sold their religion and honor to the infidels.”

The spokesperson for the Islamic Army is a frequent guest on al-Jazeera. On a number of occasions, the Qatar-based channel has been criticized by the U.S. for offering a podium to terrorists and fueling anti-American sentiment across the Middle East.

For examples of some of the untruths and conspiracy theories broadcast on al-Jazeera, please see the second note in the dispatch Al-Jazeera to be launched in English in America (March 23, 2005).

“THE PROPAGANDISTS HAVE TAKEN OVER AP”

The Associated Press no longer offers the balanced and non-partisan coverage it once pioneered, according to journalist Jules Crittenden, writing in The Boston Herald. Crittenden wonders whether “A.P.” stands for “Al-Qaeda Propaganda.” He notes that AP’s coverage from Iraq has been completely one-sided and its selection of stories tilted against America and the democratically-elected Iraqi government. The recent arrest of Bilal Hussein, an al-Qaeda activist who also worked as an AP photographer, only confirms the will of the Associated Press to present a biased version of reality, exalting the terrorists while harshly criticizing American and Iraqi attempts to bring democracy to Iraq, says Crittenden. (His full article is below).

For more on a different view of Iraq, please see Iraq 27: “Did any nation-state fall from the heavens wholly made?” (Aug. 2, 2006).

FOREIGN REPORTERS’ VEHICLES “MAY BE USED BY TERRORISTS”

The director of Israel’s Government Press Office, Danny Seaman, has warned that armored vehicles used by foreign reporters may be being utilized by hostile groups to try and carry out attacks against Israel.

Israel provides armored vehicles to foreign correspondents who travel to the West Bank and Gaza on journalistic assignments on condition that they are driven only by the foreign national who receives the vehicle. Seaman says that a significant portion of those journalists granted armored vehicles “have been violating this condition for some time now, despite our requests.”

A recent incident during which a vehicle assigned to Reuters was hit by an IDF helicopter exemplifies this misuse, the Israeli government says. The vehicle carried no foreign journalists; all the occupants were Palestinian, including one who was not a Reuters employee and had links with Hamas.

Yuval Diskin, the head of Israel’s internal security agency, the Shin Bet, is now examining the matter.

In the past, foreign reporters have inadvertently given rides to suicide bombers, thereby helping them enter Israel. A previous dispatch on this list reported that some journalists were suspected of transporting weapons for use by terrorists. For more, see Are Reuters journalists transporting grenades for Palestinian terrorists? (May 31, 2002).

There is also an article on Reuters here.

GUNMEN KIDNAP PALESTINIAN JOURNALIST

On Monday, a prominent Palestinian journalist was kidnapped from the Sawt Al-Hurriya (Voice of Freedom) radio station on the 13th floor of the Al-Shurouk Tower in the center of Gaza City by a group of at least 15 masked gunmen. Although no one claimed responsibility, Fatah officials suspect that Hamas was behind the kidnapping, as the reporter had openly criticized the Hamas-led government. The journalist, Abu Amr, is the host of a popular talk show broadcast every morning in Gaza. He has been critical of Hamas.

“The gunmen threatened him with their rifles and led him away,” said one eyewitness. “They took him in a van that was waiting outside the building. They did not give any reason for the kidnapping.”

Abu Amr was released later unharmed. The Palestinian Journalists Syndicate strongly condemned the kidnapping, saying it was the latest in a series of assaults on Palestinian journalists and media outlets in the Palestinian territories, and said the perpetrators were “terrorists” – a term most western media refuse to use about these same Hamas gunmen.

TERRORISTS ATTACK PALESTINIAN NEWS AGENCY IN GAZA

Relations between Fatah and Hamas remain strained, complicating efforts by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to form a Palestinian national unity government. Reuters report that following last week’s murder of a senior intelligence official loyal to the president, several gunmen stormed the office of the WAFA news agency in the southern Gaza Strip town of Khan Younis, severely beating up a reporter (who was then hospitalized), vandalizing equipment, and accusing the agency of biased media coverage. The WAFA news agency is controlled by Abbas.

Although Hamas denies any involvement in the murder, Abbas said that he would not agree to a unity government unless those responsible for the killing are arrested.

Two other Palestinian journalists were severely beaten last week during a demonstration in Gaza City against the Hamas-led government. Witnesses at the demonstration said assailants targeted a cameraman with Palestinian TV, and another journalist, Mwafaq Matar, known for his pro-Fatah stance. They both sustained serious injuries. On Sunday, masked gunmen in Nablus raided the offices of the al-Quds newspaper in the city and confiscated all the copies.

American and European-based journalists’ organizations, so eager to issue statements when the slightest irritating incident is experienced by western journalists at Israel’s hands, for example having their bags searched at Tel Aviv’s Ben Gurion airport, are strangely silent as Hamas (the party, in case we need reminding, in government) and other thugs hospitalize critical Palestinian journalists.

PALESTINIANS PLAN AND TRAIN FOR MORE KIDNAPPINGS

A senior member of the Popular Resistance Committees, a coalition of terror organizations in Gaza and the West Bank responsible along with Hamas and the Palestine Army of Islam for the abduction of Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit last June, said that the group is planning and training to carry out more kidnappings of Israelis.

Egypt is currently trying to broker a deal between Israel and Hamas for the release of Shalit. Media reports state that a possible exchange deal would involve Israel releasing a number of prisoners to the Palestinian Authority in exchange for Shalit, and Hamas agreeing to stop its daily rocket attacks from Gaza in exchange for Israeli troops withdrawing from Gaza and ending the targeted killings of Hamas leaders.

On Sunday, to the exasperation and outrage of many Israelis, Palestinian President Abbas said Shalit should only be released if Marwan Barghouti, a convicted mass murderer who belongs to Abbas’s own Fatah party, and Ahmed Saadat, the mastermind of the assassination of Israel’s tourist minister, were also released.

In the past, Israel has released many convicted terrorists in exchange deals. Many of those released have carried out further terror attacks soon afterwards. Among many such examples, Israeli Eyal Yeverboim and his seven-month-old son were murdered last year by terrorists that had been released under international pressure two months earlier to “strengthen” Abbas’s government. For more on this, see item 16 in the dispatch titled Saudi police ban the sale of cats and dogs (& Gaddafi’s son: Pope must convert) (Sept. 21, 2006).

DAILY TELEGRAPH: PALESTINIANS ARMING TO COPY “HIZBULLAH’S SUCCESS”

The (London) Daily Telegraph, reports today in an article headed “Gaza militants ‘prepare for showdown’,” that Palestinian terrorists have smuggled 19 tons of explosives into Gaza during the past year, as well as more effective weapons and longer-range missiles, some supplied by Iran. What is perceived among Palestinian militants to be the weakness of the response by Israel to the Hizbullah attack from Lebanon has led them to plan for more sustained military action against Israel.

A new poll by the Ramallah-based Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research shows a firm majority of Palestinians favoring the use of Hizbullah-type attacks against Israel; 63% of those polled supported the firing of rockets at Israeli cities. 57% said the attacks should be aimed at Israeli civilians, not military.

-- Tom Gross



FULL ARTICLES

“DOES AP STAND FOR AL-QAEDA PROPAGANDA?”

Does AP stand for al-Qaeda Propaganda?
By Jules Crittenden
The Boston Herald
September 24, 2006

news.bostonherald.com/columnists/view.bg?articleid=159033&format=&page=1

The Associated Press, the reliable just-the-facts news agency you and I once knew, no longer exists. Amoral propagandists have taken over.

It is not only in the disturbing matter of Bilal Hussein, AP photographer and al-Qaeda associate, being held without charge in U.S. custody in Iraq that this is evident. But also in the departure from balanced, nonpartisan coverage that has always been the AP’s promise to us, its customers.

The AP was, in fact, a pioneer in balanced coverage. The concept was born with the AP in 1848 and tempered in the Civil War. The AP served newspapers of different stripes and had to keep politics out of it.

But for any news organization going into war, it’s hard not to have a side. In 1876, AP scribe Mark Kellogg was killed with Custer at the Battle of Little Big Horn. “I go with Custer and will be at the death,” he reported. Guess which side he was on. In 1941, the AP had to shut its Berlin bureau when its reporters were arrested. In 1945, AP correspondent Joe Morton was executed by the SS. AP correspondents were imprisoned by communists in North Korea, Romania and Czechoslovakia. The AP’s Terry Anderson was held captive by Islamic extremists in Beirut for six years. It is a brave and illustrious history.

The AP has had one or two exemplary war correspondents in Iraq. But this strange war has changed so many things. In late 2004, as the U.S. military was moving to rid Fallujah of the terrorists who controlled it, the AP wanted some eyes inside the city. It hired Bilal Hussein. He gave the AP photos of insurgents setting up ambushes and firing at Americans. He gave them photos of terrorists posing with their freshly slaughtered victims. His pictures helped the AP win a Pulitzer Prize.

A blogger named Darleen at www.darleenclick.com said it very well in December of 2004:

“I have trouble with how cozy this AP photographer is with the terrorists. I realize he’s a Hussein from Fallujah, so his own personal feelings and associations may be on display here, but did The Associated Press... employ Nazis to get photos showing attacks on the Allies and the execution of Jews?"

I wish it stopped with the AP’s effort to give the enemy in Iraq a fair shake, as if terrorists were freedom fighters. Then I look at the AP copy I see nightly. The president of the United States gives a speech. The AP grants him a couple of fragmentary quotes before allowing his failed 2004 challenger and other opponents several full paragraphs to denounce him.

There is the bizarre work of Charles J. Hanley, an AP apologist for Saddam Hussein. He dismisses evidence of weapons programs and reports on the deep frustration Saddam felt when he could not convince the world of his good intentions, in those years when he was murdering his own people and playing a hard-nosed game of cat-and-mouse with U.N. weapons inspectors that led to their removal.

Last week, the AP gave us a lengthy series on the U.S. detention of terrorism suspects. The AP’s opinion was evident. Bilal Hussein was the poster boy. The salient fact that Hussein was captured with an al-Qaeda leader was buried. Al-Qaeda has killed and abducted dozens of journalists, Iraqi, American and European. Mainly Iraqi. I wonder: What’s so special about this particular Iraqi journalist that he could associate freely with al-Qaeda?

I look at Hussein’s photos. Terrorists trying to kill Americans. Terrorists posing with dead civilians. Bilal Hussein knows things about these men, who they are, how they operate. I’m thinking, Bilal Hussein looks like an accessory to murder. I’m thinking, I hope the U.S. intelligence agents who have him are getting good information out of him. And I’m wondering, who does The Associated Press want to win this war?

 

“TOTAL DISTORTIONS” BY THE GUARDIAN

‘The Guardian’ at the crossroads
By Alan Dershowitz
The Jerusalem Post
September 27, 2006

www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1159193330711&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull

The Guardian, which used to be a liberal British newspaper, has become the full-fledged Pravda of the British hard Left, especially when it comes to its one-sided bashing of Israel. Like Pravda, it will not publish alternative points of view, even when the alternative point of view seeks to correct willful mis-statements of fact. It’s gotten to the point where a reader simply cannot trust the credibility of the reporting.

Two recent incidents, in as many months, regarding total distortions of my own writing simply serve to illustrate a much larger problem. I have heard similar stories from others.

Most recently, The Guardian published an op-ed devoted to an article I had written. The writer turned virtually everything I had argued on its head. Before we get to the specifics, let’s get to the Der Stuermer-like characterization of my appearance that became a centerpoint of the articles. The author of the article, Henry Porter, claimed that he saw me on television in 2001 “looking like Animal, the wildman drummer from The Muppet Show.” What Porter did not know is that I have been clean-shaven with short hair for a decade, thus undermining Porter’s claim that he actually saw me on TV. But I suppose I’ll always be, to people like Porter, the stereotypical hairy, wild-eyed Jew.

Porter then writes that, although I say I am against torture, I really am all in favor of torture. Apparently, despite the hundreds of times that I’ve written and said publicly and clearly that I am against torture, Porter believes that he knows better – that he can read my mind or discern my views from my Animal-like face.

His third point was that “Dershowitz doesn’t understand that [i]f governments are given powers, they will almost always find a way to abuse them.” In fact, not only do I make this cautionary point, but it is a large part of my article. I write: It would also be relatively easy to combat terrorism if our government had earned more of our trust over the years. But most governments – even most liberal democracies – have tended to abuse extraordinary powers given to them during emergencies. And then I launch into a list of examples, with suggestions as to how to prevent them recurring.

Significantly, Porter manages to contradict himself in the span of less than half a page. First he takes me to task for setting up a straw argument against “liberal fundamentalists,” when he insists that he “cannot think of one who believes that all rights are unqualified, that all freedoms are absolute.” And then he concludes his rant by himself advocating the fundamentalist position that “[f]reedom is the thing which patrols and constrains government and that is why it is not amenable to compromise.”

I was compelled to write a letter to the editor correcting the many inaccuracies and pointing out the inappropriate ad hominem attack on my appearance (or rather, the appearance that the author assumed I have). The Guardian refused to print my letter.

The first incident, which took place in June, occurred when the Guardian published a review of my most recent book, Preemption: A Knife that Cuts Both Ways. I should say from the start that it was not the negative tone or conclusion of the review that bothered me. I write, on average, a book every year, and I have been an outspoken Jew and criminal defense lawyer for decades. Therefore, having a thick skin is a prerequisite of everything I do. What amazed me about this article, though, was the fact that the reviewer simply lied about what was in my book. She made things up. She said the book was about something it wasn’t about. She said I took positions when I explicitly wrote the opposite in my book.

Why would a book reviewer go to such great lengths to defame me and to falsify what I wrote? After all, I am a liberal Democrat and have spent my career as a law professor, author, and defense lawyer fighting for civil liberties and the rights of the accused. In fact, my book is precisely about how to take the lessons of liberal democracy marked by transparency and accountability and apply them in a world that increasingly relies on preventive and preemptive criminal justice procedures and international military interventions. One would think that these credentials and this topic would endear me to the Guardian.

But I am also, as I wrote above, an outspoken Jew and Zionist, and I wrote a section in my book about Israel. It was supportive of some, and critical of others of Israel’s preemptive military actions. And it is just this sort of balanced assessment of Israel’s behavior coupled with a refusal to demonize the Jewish state that sends Guardian writers into apoplectic fits. Liberalism and Zionism are not considered mutually exclusive in America. In fact, they are complementary. The prevailing view at the Guardian is to the contrary.

Lets look at what the Guardian actually said. The reviewer of my book, a woman named Louise Christian who claims to be a lawyer but who demonstrates none of the requisite analytical skills of the profession, immediately seized upon my section on Israel and focused on it for the majority of her article.

She characterizes the book as “an attempt to justify the Iraq war and even the actions of the state of Israel” (which the author, a Harvard law professor, obsessively admires) [emphasis added].

First, notice the “even” before Israel, showing that the author assumes the actions of Israel to be particularly indefensible. Second, I do not try to justify Israel’s actions. I analyze its actions, and I conclude that some of them were justified and beneficial, while others were wrongheaded and unnecessary.

Finally, had Christian read the book, she would know that I opposed the war in Iraq. She apparently assumed that because I support Israel’s right to exist, I also supported America’s war in Iraq. It’s a telling assumption.

Not only does Christian mischaracterize the topics of my book and my positions. She goes right ahead and lies about what I say. For example, she writes, “In its concluding chapter the book goes so far as to suggest that theories of chromosomal abnormality should be pursued as predictive of violent crime to justify long-term detention.”

In fact, I say just the opposite. Christian is referring to an appendix in which I reproduce an article I published in 1975. The whole thrust of the article is categorically against the use of the XYY chromosome to predict violence, since I demonstrate conclusively that the XYY karyotype is not predictive. Here is what I say: “Nor is it likely that the XYY karyotype, even in combination of other factors, could be used to predict violence. There is simply no hard evidence establishing that any combination of factors can accurately spot a large percentage of future violent criminals without also including an unsatisfactorily number and percentage of false positives.”

How on Earth could Christian transform my strong opposition to using chromosomes as criminal predictors to support? She simply reversed my position. This cannot be a simple mistake. It is plainly a willful deception of her readers.

A mendacious review is one thing, but what’s worse is that The Guardian refused to correct its mistake. When I wrote a letter to the editor refuting Christians’s blatant lies, Alan Rusbridger, editor of The Guardian, responded that he could not publish my letter. The reason he gave was that my letter was too long. And so I responded that I would cut my letter to any length he asked. But The Guardian persisted in refusing to let me set the record straight.

It would be unthinkable for an American or Israeli newspaper to publish a full-blown attack on an individual without at least extending the right to reply in the letters page. The Guardian did precisely that to me, and twice in a single summer.

Perspective is one thing, but there’s something very wrong with any paper that would publish and then stand behind factual inaccuracies in the service of a political agenda. That sort of cavalier attitude toward the truth is more fitting of a Stalinist newspaper than of Britain’s liberal newspaper of note. It’s discouraging to see such a prominent and previously honorable publication abandon its standards so readily.

I challenge The Guardian to defend or even explain its journalistic decision to stand by the demonstrable falsehoods and defamations of its writers.


Mozart cancelled in Germany due to fear of offending Muslims (& Egypt seizes papers)

September 26, 2006

* Tunisia & Egypt seize French & German newspapers over Islam remarks
* Pakistani cleric says pope should be crucified
* Assyrian Christians murdered over pope remarks
* Ex-PM Aznar: Muslims should “apologize for occupying Spain for 800 years”
* “Nothing the Pope has ever said comes close to matching the hatred that pours out of the mouths of radical imams”

 

CONTENTS

1. Tunisia and Egypt confiscate Le Figaro, Frankfurter Allgemeine
2. Mozart performance cancelled in Germany due to fear of offending Muslims
3. “Conquering Rome is the answer”
4. Hamas leader: Pope is “ignorant and stupid”
5. More churches attacked in West Bank and Gaza
6. “A conspiracy between the pope and Bush”
7. Pope meets with envoys from the Muslim world
8. Two Assyrian Christians killed in Iraq over pope remarks
9. European Union head defends pope
10. Aznar calls on Muslims to “apologize for occupying Spain for 800 years”
11. Saudi morality police will not be dissolved
12. The West should “quit saying sorry and unite”
13. “Enough apologies” (By Anne Applebaum, Washington Post, Sept. 19, 2006)
14. “Benedict’s opposite” (By Bret Stephens, Wall Street Journal, Sept. 26, 2006)



[Note by Tom Gross]

TUNISIA AND EGYPT CONFISCATE LE FIGARO, F. A. Z.

Authorities in Tunisia and Egypt have confiscated last Tuesday’s edition of the French newspaper Le Figaro because it ran an article which they deemed insulting to Islam.

The French daily carried a piece by philosopher Robert Redeker about the controversy over the pope’s recent remarks. Redeker described the Koran as a “book of unprecedented violence,” and accused Muslims of seeking to intimidate the West.

Redeker wrote: “Merciless warrior, pillager, murderer of Jews and polygamist – that is how Mohammed portrays himself in the Koran... the book by which every Muslim is educated.”

The banned article can be read in French here. (Please scroll down two boxes.)

Yesterday, the Egyptian information ministry followed the Tunisians by banning not only Le Figaro, but another important European newspaper, the leading German daily, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. In its September 16 edition, German historian Egon Flaig had used examples of the Prophet Mohammed’s military leadership to support the idea that Islam has had a violent history (which it has).

Egypt says that for the time being copies of Le Figaro and Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung will not be allowed into Egypt.

Le Figaro and Le Monde are competing for the highest circulation in France. Le Figaro has a circulation of 400,000 and is perceived as conservative. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung is a quality national German newspaper with a circulation of over 380,000 and a daily readership of over one million.

Lest anyone need reminding, the Egyptian media is rife with highly offensive caricatures of Jews and others. For example, see Cartoons from the Arab World.

MOZART PERFORMANCE CANCELLED IN GERMANY DUE TO FEAR OF OFFENDING MUSLIMS

One of Germany’s leading opera houses, Deutsche Oper Berlin, announced on Monday that it was canceling a controversial production because of the likelihood that it might offend Muslims.

The original opera, Idomeneo, by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, makes no reference to Islam, but director Hans Neuenfels introduced a scene to his production that depicts the decapitated heads of the Prophet Mohammed, Jesus Christ, the Buddha, and the Greek god Poseidon.

Security authorities in Berlin advised that the performance posed an “incalculable” security risk. The production had been on for the last three years before recent threats were made against it.

The cancellation of the 225-year-old opera has triggered a storm of protest among German political and cultural figures. Berlin’s mayor, Klaus Wowereit, warned today that “Our ideas about openness, tolerance and freedom must be lived on the offensive. Voluntary self-limitation gives those who fight against our values a confirmation in advance that we will not stand behind them.” German Chancellor Angela Merkel said that “self-censorship out of fear” should not be tolerated.

For the German speakers on this list/website, an article about this can be read here.

“CONQUERING ROME IS THE ANSWER”

Thousands of Muslim worshippers marched against Pope Benedict XVI in Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza on Friday. At the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem, considered to be Islam’s third-holiest shrine, worshippers hoisted banners that read “Conquering Rome is the answer.”

In the streets of Nablus, protestors waving Hamas flags called the pope a “coward and agent of the Americans.” In northern Gaza, more than 1,000 Islamic Jihad supporters shouted in praise of the prophet, and waved black flags and condemned the pope. In Ramallah, hundreds of Hamas supporters marched around the city center.

Rallies were also held in Pakistan and Malaysia. Hafiz Hussain Ahmed, a senior leader of Pakistan’s main alliance of radical parties, told demonstrators in Islamabad, “If the pope comes here we will hang him on the Cross.” Another Islamic leader said the pontiff should be crucified.

Malaysia’s opposition Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party staged demonstrations outside mosques nationwide, and held up banners that read, “We Muslims are peace-loving people.”

The pope had already apologized several times and said he was “deeply sorry” about the reactions to his remarks and stressed that they did not reflect his own opinions, and that he had “deep respect” for Islam.

HAMAS LEADER: POPE IS “IGNORANT AND STUPID”

On Fatah-controlled Palestinian TV last Friday, Hamas religious leader Dr. Osama Al-Mazini called the pope “criminal and arrogant,” and “ignorant and stupid.”

Al-Mazini said: “To this arrogant Pope – criminal and arrogant – this message is from Allah the Elevated and the Exalted, as it was said: ‘Think not that Allah is unaware of what the wicked do. He but gives them a respite until a day when eyes will stare (in terror).’ [Sura14:42]”

The official Hamas weekly “Al Risala” featured a cartoon of Pope Benedict holding a Swastika while wearing a scarf of U.S. and Danish flags. The text under the cartoon is “The Pope and those who live under his cloak.”

The cartoon from “Al Risala” can be seen here.

(With thanks to Palestinian Media Watch, the senior staff of whom subscribe to this list, for the above information.)

For more cartoons on the recent controversy over the pope’s remarks about Islam, please see Cartoonists against the Pope (Sept. 19, 2006).

MORE CHURCHES ATTACKED IN WEST BANK AND GAZA

Palestinian police guarding a Roman Catholic church in Nablus were involved in an exchange of fire with assailants and chased them away on Saturday morning.

On Friday evening, three small pipe bombs were thrown at a Greek Orthodox church in Gaza city. One bomb blackened the main entrance of the church.

Police were posted at churches in the West Bank and Gaza after the first spate of attacks. For more on this, see Palestinians attack churches as anti-Pope sentiment grows around world (Sept. 18, 2006).

“A CONSPIRACY BETWEEN THE POPE AND BUSH”

In Cairo, a “Day of Anger” was held at the 10th century al-Azhar mosque, a traditional center of Sunni Muslim learning. A banner strung between two mosque pillars urged, “Wake up Muslims! It’s a conspiracy between the pope and Bush!”

Kamal Habib, a scholar who helped organize the protest in Cairo, commented that “It looks as if the Vatican is providing the religious justification for the wars waged in Iraq and Afghanistan.”

After prayers in the Iranian capital Teheran, 300 people staged a protest rally. Whilst burning U.S., British and Israeli flags, they chanted “Death to America” and “Death to Israel.”

POPE MEETS WITH ENVOYS FROM THE MUSLIM WORLD

Pope Benedict XVI expressed “total and profound respect” for the Muslim faith during a meeting yesterday with envoys from the Muslim world.

The pope also called for “sincere and respectful dialogue” during the meeting, held at the pope’s residence near Rome. It is thought this was a reference to restrictions on the church’s activity in some Muslim countries.

Attending the meeting were ambassadors from 21 countries, a representative from the Arab League, as well as local Islamic representatives from Italy.

Following the meeting, the ambassador of Indonesia, the world’s largest Muslim nation, complained that the pope had not referred directly to the speech which sparked the controversy.

Iraq’s ambassador said it was time to move on from the row and build bridges.

TWO ASSYRIAN CHRISTIANS KILLED IN IRAQ OVER POPE REMARKS

An Assyrian Christian man was stabbed to death at the Assyrian market in the Doura District in Baghdad on Saturday. This came a day after an attack on the Syriac Catholic Church in the Ashar district of central Basra where another man was murdered.

Christian leaders in Iraq have warned their congregations to be extremely cautious and not to leave their homes as a new group called the Young Brigades of Fundamental Islam has distributed leaflets announcing that all Iraqi Christians would be killed in three days if the Pope does not apologize.

EUROPEAN UNION HEAD DEFENDS POPE

“Attacking the pope because he refers in a discourse to a historical document is completely unacceptable,” EU Commission President Jose Manuel Durao Barroso told Germany’s Welt am Sonntag newspaper. Barroso added that he was “disappointed that there weren’t more European leaders who said, ‘obviously the pope has the right to express his opinion.’ The problem is not the comments of the pope but the reactions of the extremists ... We must defend our values.”

AZNAR CALLS ON MUSLIMS TO “APOLOGIZE FOR OCCUPYING SPAIN FOR 800 YEARS”

The former Spanish prime minister, Jose Maria Aznar, pointed out in a speech a few days ago that Muslims have never apologized for the nearly 800-year Moorish occupation of Spain that began in the year 711 with an invasion from North Africa.

Aznar said: “It is interesting to note that while a lot of people in the world are asking the pope to apologize for his speech, I have never heard a Muslim say sorry for having conquered Spain and occupying it for eight centuries.”

The former Spanish prime minister described it as “absurd” if one compared it to the constant call by Muslims demanding apologies whenever they feel offended by remarks by non-Muslims.

In the same speech, delivered at the Hudson Institute in Washington D.C., Aznar said the West is under attack from radical Islam and must defend itself. “It is them or it is us. There is no middle ground.”

Aznar was voted out of office in 2004 within days of Spain being hit by the biggest terror attack in Europe since the Second World War. For more, see Madrid 1: Does Bin Laden wish to reclaim “Occupied Spain”? (March 13, 2004).

SAUDI MORALITY POLICE WILL NOT BE DISSOLVED

Saudi Interior Minister Prince Nayef bin Abdul Aziz has resisted calls to dissolve the morality police, a 4,000-strong force known as Mutawas.

Prince Nayef said at the weekend in defense of the Islamic police: “They talk about an organ that promotes the good and prevents the bad. Its dissolution has been rejected in the past, it is rejected today, and it will be rejected tomorrow.”

For more on some of the laws that are enforced by the Mutawas, please see Saudi police ban the sale of cats and dogs (& Gaddafi’s son: Pope must convert) (Sept. 21, 2006).

THE WEST SHOULD “QUIT SAYING SORRY AND UNITE”

Jeff Jacoby, writing in the Boston Globe, warns that another “frenzy” will occur soon. “It’s only a matter of time until the next one erupts. This time it was a 14th-century quote from a Byzantine ruler that set off – or rather, was exploited by Islamist firebrands to ignite – the international demonstrations, death threats, and violence. Earlier this year it was cartoons about Mohammed in a Danish newspaper. Last year it was a Newsweek report, later debunked, that a Koran had been desecrated by a U.S. interrogator in Guantanamo. Before that it was Jerry Falwell’s comment on ‘60 Minutes’ that Mohammed was a ‘terrorist.’ Back in 1989 it was the publication of Salman Rushdie’s satirical novel, ‘The Satanic Verses.’”

“In every case, the pretext for the Muslim rage was the claim that Islam had been insulted. Freedom of speech was irrelevant: While the rioters and those inciting them routinely insult Christianity, Judaism, and other religions, they demand that no one be allowed to denigrate Islam or its prophet. It is a staggering double standard, and too many in the West seem willing to go along with it. Witness the editorials in U.S. newspapers this week scolding the pope for his speech.”

The article by Jacoby, a subscriber to this list, can be read in full here.

***

I attach two further articles in full below. Anne Applebaum, writing in the Washington Post, expresses shock at all the apologies by the pope: “No one, apparently, can remember any pope, not even the media-friendly John Paul II, apologizing for anything in such specific terms: not for the Inquisition, not for the persecution of Galileo and certainly not for a single comment made to an academic audience in an unimportant German city.”

She calls on the “West to quit saying sorry and unite, occasionally, in its own defense. The fanatics attacking the pope already limit the right to free speech among their own followers. I don’t see why we should allow them to limit our right to free speech, too.”

The second article, by Bret Stephens in today’s Wall Street Journal, compares Pope Benedict XVI to Yusuf al-Qaradawi, “the nearest thing Sunni Islam has to a pope… His fatwas, or religious edicts on matters personal or political, are widely considered definitive among Sunnis.”

One of the many examples given by Stephens is from February of this year. In response to the Danish cartoon controversy, Qaradawi said on al-Jazeera: “The nation must rage in anger… We are not a nation of jackasses... We are lions that zealously protect their dens, and avenge affronts to their sanctities.”

Stephens notes that the following day, “mobs attacked the Danish and Norwegian embassies in Damascus; the day after that, they burned the Danish consulate in Beirut to the ground. The same day, a Catholic priest was shot in Turkey by a teenage boy. In all, some 30 people were killed answering Mr. Qaradawi’s call to rage.”

As I have pointed out before, Qaradawi remains the darling of certain leftist western politicians, such as London mayor Ken Livingstone, who makes a point of publicly hugging Qaradawi, even after he praised Palestinian suicide bombers.

-- Tom Gross



FULL ARTICLES

“WESTERN POLITICIANS, WRITERS, THINKERS AND SPEAKERS SHOULD STOP APOLOGIZING – AND START UNITING”

Enough apologies
By Anne Applebaum
The Washington Post
September 19, 2006

Already, angry Palestinian militants have assaulted seven West Bank and Gaza churches, destroying two of them. In Somalia, gunmen shot dead an elderly Italian nun. Radical clerics from Qatar to Qom have called, variously, for a “day of anger” or for worshipers to “hunt down” the pope and his followers. From Turkey to Malaysia, Muslim politicians have condemned the pope and called his apology “insufficient.” And all of this because Benedict XVI, speaking at the University of Regensburg, quoted a Byzantine emperor who, more than 600 years ago, called Islam a faith “spread by the sword.” We’ve been here before, of course. Similar protests were sparked last winter by cartoon portrayals of Mohammed in the Danish press. Similar apologies resulted, though Benedict’s is more surprising than those of the Danish government. No one, apparently, can remember any pope, not even the media-friendly John Paul II, apologizing for anything in such specific terms: not for the Inquisition, not for the persecution of Galileo and certainly not for a single comment made to an academic audience in an unimportant German city.

But Western reactions to Muslim “days of anger” have followed a familiar pattern, too. Last winter, some Western newspapers defended their Danish colleagues, even going so far as to reprint the cartoons – but others, including the Vatican, attacked the Danes for giving offense. Some leading Catholics have now defended the pope – but others, no doubt including some Danes, have complained that his statement should have been better vetted, or never given at all. This isn’t surprising: By definition, the West is not monolithic. Left-leaning journalists don’t identify with right-leaning colleagues (or right-leaning Catholic colleagues), and vice versa. Not all Christians, let alone all Catholics – even all German Catholics – identify with the pope either, and certainly they don’t want to defend his every scholarly quotation.

Unfortunately, these subtle distinctions are lost on the fanatics who torch embassies and churches. And they may also be preventing all of us from finding a useful response to the waves of anti-Western anger and violence that periodically engulf parts of the Muslim world. Clearly, a handful of apologies and some random public debate – should the pope have said X, should the Danish prime minister have done Y – are ineffective and irrelevant: None of the radical clerics accepts Western apologies, and none of their radical followers reads the Western press. Instead, Western politicians, writers, thinkers and speakers should stop apologizing – and start uniting.

By this, I don’t mean that we all need to rush to defend or to analyze this particular sermon; I leave that to experts on Byzantine theology. But we can all unite in our support for freedom of speech – surely the pope is allowed to quote from medieval texts – and of the press. And we can also unite, loudly, in our condemnation of violent, unprovoked attacks on churches, embassies and elderly nuns. By “we” I mean here the White House, the Vatican, the German Greens, the French Foreign Ministry, NATO, Greenpeace, Le Monde and Fox News – Western institutions of the left, the right and everything in between. True, these principles sound pretty elementary – “we’re pro-free speech and anti-gratuitous violence” – but in the days since the pope’s sermon, I don’t feel that I’ve heard them defended in anything like a unanimous chorus. A lot more time has been spent analyzing what the pontiff meant to say, or should have said, or might have said if he had been given better advice.

All of which is simply beside the point, since nothing the pope has ever said comes even close to matching the vitriol, extremism and hatred that pour out of the mouths of radical imams and fanatical clerics every day, all across Europe and the Muslim world, almost none of which ever provokes any Western response at all. And maybe it’s time that it should: When Saudi Arabia publishes textbooks commanding good Wahhabi Muslims to “hate” Christians, Jews and non-Wahhabi Muslims, for example, why shouldn’t the Vatican, the Southern Baptists, Britain’s chief rabbi and the Council on American-Islamic Relations all condemn them – simultaneously?

Maybe it’s a pipe dream: The day when the White House and Greenpeace can issue a joint statement is surely distant indeed. But if stray comments by Western leaders – not to mention Western films, books, cartoons, traditions and values – are going to inspire regular violence, I don’t feel that it’s asking too much for the West to quit saying sorry and unite, occasionally, in its own defense. The fanatics attacking the pope already limit the right to free speech among their own followers. I don’t see why we should allow them to limit our right to free speech, too.

 

BENEDICT’S OPPOSITE

Benedict’s opposite
By Bret Stephens
The Wall Street Journal
September 26, 2006

“Constantinople was conquered, and the second part of the [prophet Mohammed’s] prophecy remains, that is, the conquest of Romiyya [Rome]... Islam entered Europe twice and left it... Perhaps the next conquest, Allah willing, will be by means of preaching and ideology.”

-- Yusuf al-Qaradawi on al-Jazeera, Jan. 24, 1999

Who knows whether the Vatican ever sought an apology from Mr. Qaradawi for suggesting that Catholicism will one day be extinguished in its heartland and uprooted from its capital. But it’s never too late to demand one, especially now that the good sheikh is in a lather over Pope Benedict’s recent remarks about Islam.

In an era without a caliph, the Egyptian-born, 80-year-old Mr. Qaradawi is the nearest thing Sunni Islam has to a pope. His weekly al-Jazeera talk show, “Shariah and Life,” reaches tens of millions of Arabic-speakers in the Middle East and Europe. His fatwas, or religious edicts on matters personal or political, are widely considered definitive among Sunnis. As the de facto spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, Mr. Qaradawi is a theological traditionalist, although he is also associated with the “new wave” Islamism that seeks to attract a younger, more modern audience. Mr. Qaradawi is also occasionally at odds with the violent asceticism of Salafist clerics, which gives him, among Muslims and to some extent in the West, a reputation as a moderate.

On Friday Mr. Qaradawi was at his sanctimonious best, saying, “the pope has closed the doors of religious dialogue between the Muslims and the Vatican by such offending remarks,” according to the Gulf Times. “Muslims are not opting for a ‘battle,’” he added, “but it was imposed on us by the pope who refused to recant.” Mr. Qaradawi now calls for a boycott of the Vatican, though he condemns violence against Christians.

That’s something of an improvement over his role early this year in the Danish cartoon controversy. “The nation must rage in anger,” he said on al-Jazeera Feb. 3. “We are not a nation of jackasses... We are lions that zealously protect their dens, and avenge affronts to their sanctities.” On Feb. 4, mobs attacked the Danish and Norwegian embassies in Damascus; the day after that, they burned the Danish consulate in Beirut to the ground. The same day, a Catholic priest was shot in Turkey by a teenage boy. In all, some 30 people were killed answering Mr. Qaradawi’s call to rage.

It was typical of the sheikh that he followed his initial exhortation by denouncing the subsequent violence: “We never call on people to set fire to cars, but to express their anger in a prudent manner.” Of course. But Mr. Qaradawi has an interesting way of speaking out of both sides of his mouth, or tailoring his message to fit his audience.

Consider his views on terrorism. “Islam, the religion of tolerance... considers the attack against innocent human beings a grave sin,” he said almost immediately after Sept. 11. But here is something else he said in those days: “Can anyone prove that [Osama bin Laden] sent [the perpetrators]? ... There is no doubt that the one who benefits from this crime is the Zionist entity.” And as the U.S. was gearing up to oust the Taliban, Mr. Qaradawi added that “Islamic law says that if a Muslim country is attacked, the other Muslim countries must help it, with their souls and their money, until it is liberated.”

Now take Mr. Qaradawi’s statements about the U.S. in Iraq. “I have forbidden the murder of Americans,” he told al-Jazeera in late 2004. But he qualified that to say it was only forbidden to kill “civilians.” Which civilians? Only those not aiding the occupation, meaning journalists and humanitarian-aid workers. He said the “jihad-waging Iraqi people’s resistance to the foreign occupation... is a Sharia duty.” And he added that “it is forbidden for any Muslim to offer support to the occupiers... because such support would be support of their crimes and aggression.”

Thus, from a starting position that forbids the killing of Americans in Iraq, Mr. Qaradawi carves out one exception after another until he effectively calls for the killing of all but a handful of Americans, and perhaps their allies among Iraqis as well.

Mr. Qaradawi is equally slippery when it comes to discussing Jews. Islam, he said in 2005, “welcomes those who believe in the [Jewish] religion.” He has also said that he “welcomes Jews who dissociate themselves from what Israel is doing,” a point that supposedly speaks to his moderation in distinguishing Judaism (for which he has respect) from Zionism (for which he only has loathing).

But one doesn’t have to scratch hard on the surface of Mr. Qaradawi’s thoughts to discover the anti-Semite within. “The iniquity of the Jews, as a community, is obvious and apparent,” he said in June 2004. “Everything will be on our side against Jews on [Judgment Day],” he added in February 2006. “At that time, even the stones and the trees will speak, with or without words, and say, ‘Oh servant of Allah, oh Muslim, there’s a Jew behind me, come and kill him.’”

For all this, Sheikh Qaradawi evinces no regret, although he frequently claims to be misrepresented (never more so than by the invaluable Middle East Media Research Center, responsible for most of the translations used here). But it wasn’t a Zionist agent, yet rather the Qatari religious scholar Abd al-Hamid Al Ansari, who said this of Mr. Qaradawi:

“The Sharia rulings that forbid harming civilians remained valid [for centuries] until Sheikh al-Qaradawi... created a dangerous breach with regard to Jihad. This was when, out of support for Hamas, he ruled that suicide operations among civilians were legitimate... This fatal breach has created an ideological and moral crisis in Islam... The moral deterioration has reached the point that they blow up children in Baghdad and peaceful civilians on buses in London. These fatwas are a moral and ideological mark of shame, which we must purge from our Islam.”

Maybe Muslims really are entitled to an apology. If so, it isn’t Benedict who needs to make it.


Plot to decapitate Israeli ambassador to Norway (& Israel welcomes Swedish elections)

September 25, 2006

* Shots also fired at Oslo synagogue
* Election results in Sweden herald fall of one of Europe’s most anti-Israel governments

 

CONTENTS

1. Four arrested in plot to kill Israeli ambassador to Norway
2. Two synagogues attacked in Russia hours before Jewish holiday
3. Nazi flag and salute in Lithuanian bar
4. Poland has its first native rabbi in 40 years
5. “Barely hidden joy in Jerusalem over Swedish election” (Jerusalem Post, Sept. 21, 2006)



[Note by Tom Gross]

This dispatch includes news on attacks and would-be attacks on Israelis and Jews in northern Europe in recent days, and a possible change in policies in Sweden, arguably the country which has had the most anti-Israeli government in Europe.

FOUR ARRESTED IN PLOT TO KILL ISRAELI AMBASSADOR TO NORWAY

Norwegian authorities have arrested four men over a plot to decapitate the Israeli ambassador to Norway, Miriam Shomrat, and blow up the Israeli and American embassies in Oslo. The four could face jail terms of up to 12 years if convicted.

The suspects, two of Pakistani background, one of Turkish origin and a native Norwegian, are also charged with firing at least 10 shots from an automatic weapon at Oslo’s only synagogue last week, causing damage but no injuries. The youngest suspect, who is 26, is not an immigrant. Norwegian media report he is the son of a royal residence employee, and until May lived in the area of the royal residence.

Norway’s Jewish population, which numbers 7,000, has been the object of several attacks in recent months. Among other incidents, a person wearing a skull cap was attacked and a Jewish cemetery desecrated. The police have now greatly increased security around Jewish sites.

According to a Norwegian Jewish journalist, such acts were legitimized by the anti-Israel atmosphere following the Lebanon war and by a letter sent by Norwegian author Jostein Gaarder*, prophesying a flood of biblical proportions engulfing Israel, and saying that “the first Zionist terrorists started operating in the days of Jesus.”

Norway was the target of Islamic rage earlier this year after a Norwegian publication became the first to reprint the cartoons of Mohammed from a Danish newspaper, cartoons which many Muslims found highly offensive. About 75,000 Muslims live in the country, less than 2 percent of the population.

(* For more on “Sophie’s World” author Gaarder, please see the dispatch Firm with Nazi past buys 25% of Ha’aretz (& animals recover from Hizbullah), Aug. 21, 2006.)

TWO SYNAGOGUES ATTACKED IN RUSSIA HOURS BEFORE JEWISH HOLIDAY

Just hours before Jewish communities gathered to celebrate the Rosh Hashanah (Jewish new year’s) holiday on Friday evening, two synagogues in Russia were attacked.

The windows of a synagogue in Khabarovsk, a city of 580,000 on the border with China, were shattered. And a Molotov cocktail was thrown at the second synagogue, in the Volga River city of Astrakhan in southern Russia, setting a door on fire.

Russia’s chief rabbi Berel Lazar (who is a subscriber to this email list) said that although the Jewish community was shocked by the attacks, “if those who attacked the synagogues expected to scare Jews on those holy days, they have been mistaken.”

According to Russian anti-racism groups, recent years have witnessed a rise in xenophobia and hate crimes, partly as a consequence of the authorities’ reluctance in prosecuting the perpetrators. Possibly in response to such criticism, Russian courts sentenced to 16 years in prison the man who stabbed nine people in a Moscow synagogue last January.

NAZI FLAG AND SALUTE IN LITHUANIA BAR

Last week, a bar in Kaunas, Lithuania, decided to celebrate its 10th anniversary by flying a Nazi flag and dressing one of its waiters as Adolph Hitler, who was then instructed to give the Nazi salute to its customers. According to a Lithuanian daily, the bar also celebrates Hitler’s birthday.

Dr. Efraim Zuroff, of the Wiesenthal Center (who is a subscriber to this list), expressed his outrage and called for the prosecution of those responsible. The display of the Nazi flag did not come as a surprise, he said, since Lithuania has failed to prosecute and punish local Nazi war criminals and is a country in which those who facilitated the annihilation of its Jewish population are treated with undue sympathy and mercy.

In 2001, Dr. Zuroff handed the Lithuanian government a list of 97 names of suspected Nazi collaborators. So far only three have stood trial for Holocaust-related crimes and none has received a sentence.

More than 220,000 Jews lived in Lithuania before WWII and the first mass murder of Jews during the war took place in Kaunas. Today, there are about 4,000 Jews remaining in the country.

POLAND HAS ITS FIRST NATIVE RABBI IN 40 YEARS

Poland’s Jewish community now has its first native Pole to serve as a rabbi since the fall of communism in 1989. Rabbi Mati Pawlak, 29, who had no idea he was Jewish for the first half of his life, is the first Pole to become a rabbi in 40 years and is being seen as an important symbol of hope for Poland’s Jewish community. Pawlak, from the town of Szczecin in northwestern Poland, didn’t learn until he was 14 that his family was Jewish. His mother only told him after communism fell and it became safer for Poles to admit that they were Jewish, even to their own families.

Since the end of communism, many other Poles have been told by their parents or grandparents that they are Jewish, and today there are estimated to be around 30,000 people identifying themselves as Jews in Poland. 90 percent of the 3.5 million Jews who lived there before WWII were murdered by the Nazis.

Three other rabbis – an American, an Israeli and a Swede of Polish origin – have also recently begun working in Poland, pushing up the number nationwide from three to seven – the highest in 50 years.

Last week, Germany’s Jewish community also had its first three rabbis ordained since the Holocaust.

ISRAEL WARMLY WELCOMES SWEDISH ELECTION RESULT

Israeli government officials welcomed the defeat of Sweden’s Social Democratic government at last week’s elections, saying they hope it will end an “unabashedly pro-Arab, anti-Israeli” position. Sweden's center-right opposition alliance claimed victory in the elections, ending 12 years of Social Democrat rule. Israeli officials say that Sweden has been more critical of Israel than any other European country and that the election of a center-right government will change things.

For more on Swedish hostility to Jews and Israel, see the article below, as well as the following dispatches. In the first of these dispatches, we are reminded of how the Swedish government defended an exhibit glorifying the suicide bomber of a Haifa restaurant. That bomber killed 23 people.

* Sweden 1: The killer as Snow White (Jan. 19, 2004).
* Sweden 2: The ambassador and the artist debate live on radio (Jan. 19, 2004).
* Sweden 3: Suicide posters removed from subway stations (Jan. 22, 2004).

-- Tom Gross



FULL ARTICLE

“THE SOCIAL DEMOCRATS WENT THAT EXTRA MILE IN THEIR CRITICISM OF ISRAEL”

Barely hidden joy in Jerusalem over Swedish election
By Herb Keinon
The Jerusalem Post
September 21, 2006

www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1157913677074&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

Nobody will admit it formally, but a few government officials in Jerusalem are dancing a jig over the defeat Sunday of Sweden’s Social Democratic government.

For years, said Zvi Mazel, a former Israeli ambassador to Stockholm, the Swedish Social Democratic government has promoted an unabashedly “pro-Arab, anti-Israeli” position.

Mazel said that the center-right parties, headed by 41-year-old prime minister designate Fredrik Reinfeld, who ousted Prime Minister Goran Persson, made supportive comments about Israel while in the opposition.

“We had good relations with them in the past, and hope it will continue,” Mazel said.

Mazel – who in 2004 wrecked a display at the Museum of National Antiquities in Stockholm that glorified a suicide bomber – said that Sweden has for years been among the most critical countries in the EU towards Israel, along with Ireland and France.

He said that the new government was likely to bring Sweden’s Middle East policy from the far left into the center in the EU, and that he believed the new government’s public declarations about Israel and the Middle East would be far less critical.

Mazel’s optimism was shared by Gunnar Hokmark, a Swedish member of the European parliament from one of the central-right Swedish parties. Hokmark, chairman of the Israel-Swedish Friendship League, said from Brussels that he thought the new government would “chart a more balanced policy,” toward Israel.

According to Hokmark, the new government was likely to “be more focused on the support for democracy development in the Middle East.”

Although foreign policy played almost no role in the elections, Hokmark said Reinfeld had made some comments in the campaign for the need for stable regimes in Syria and Lebanon.

One senior official in Jerusalem said that although it was hard to say whether there would be a dramatic change in Stockholm’s policies, “there is definitely an opportunity now to turn a new page. The social democrats went that extra mile in their criticism of Israel,” the official said. Over the last few years, he added, Sweden has distinguished itself in being more critical of Israel than about any other European country.

Among the major Israeli-Swedish diplomatic brickbats over the last four years were the following:

In May, Sweden broke ranks with the European Union and issued a visa to a Hamas minister, enraging Jerusalem and causing discomfort in some other European capitals.

In April, Israel protested Sweden’s decision to drop out of an international air force exercise because Israel was involved. Persson told reporters at the time that Sweden withdrew from the exercise in Italy because “we are careful about joining exercises with countries that we won’t cooperate with in international missions under UN or EU mandates,” he said.

“That’s our principle... that’s our history. The Israelis have another, more warlike, history, which I find regrettable for that matter.”

In June 2004, visiting Swedish Foreign Minister Laila Freivalds took Israel to task for alleged violations of international law, saying Sweden’s younger generation gets very upset when it sees these violations on television.

In 2003, Foreign Minister Anna Lindh, who was later assassinated, said at an award ceremony in Sweden for Hanan Ashrawi that “I fear that the Palestinian people soon will lose all hope of an independent state, and that Israel will lose its moral values. Israel is a democracy balancing on a thin line,” she said.

In August 2002, after UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan issued a report on the IDF’s operations in the Jenin refugee camp that cleared Israel of Palestinian charges of a massacre in the camp, Lindh released a press statement taking issue with the conclusions. “Israel’s refusal to cooperate with the UN has meant that a full and comprehensive report has not been possible to produce,” she said. “The report shows that serious crimes against humanitarian law have occurred.”

In May 2002, Lindh – a frequent critic of former prime minister Ariel Sharon – said in a Swedish media interview that her goal was that “Israeli citizens will turn against the military polices of Sharon.” She said “Israel’s government has chosen a course of action that risks placing the country outside of the rest of the world community.”


Saudi police ban the sale of cats and dogs (& Gaddafi’s son: Pope must convert)

September 21, 2006

* Libyan dictator Gaddafi’s son: Pope should convert to Islam “immediately”
* Six-year-old girl burned to death in “honor” killing in Birmingham, England
* Horrific 12-day gang rape of mother/daughter as punishment for college
* Nigerian pickpocket in Saudi Arabia has hand cut off
* Islamists close down Somali radio station for airing “love songs”
* Al-Qaeda threatens France

 

CONTENTS

1. Did anyone say double standards?
2. Saudi religious police ban cats and dogs
3. Nigerian pickpocket at Mecca’s Grand Mosque has hand cut off
4. Six-year-old girl burned to death in “honor” killing in Birmingham, England
5. Horrific 12-day gang rape of mother/daughter as punishment for college
6. Ruler of Dubai accused of child trafficking
7. Islamists close down Somali radio station for airing “love songs”
8. Islamic conference: Muslims must buy up western media
9. Suicide bombing spreads
10. Gaddafi’s son: Pope must convert to Islam “immediately”
11. Al-Qaeda “leader” claims murder of Sudan newspaper editor
12. Al-Qaeda threatens France
13. 40 killed in Yemen stampede
14. Head of Muslim Council of Britain warns of two million terrorists
15. Hizbullah announces “victory rally” tomorrow
16. Report: Freed terrorists killed 132 Israelis after release
17. Saddam rages against “agents of Zionism”
18. Associated Press employee “spied for Saddam”



[Note by Tom Gross]

DID ANYONE SAY DOUBLE STANDARDS?

The following notes, about some of the excesses of the Islamic world, accompanies this week’s other dispatches about the reaction by some Muslims to Pope Benedict XVI’s comments on Islam.

Those so vigorously protesting the pope’s remarks seem to have little to say about fellow Muslims citing the Koran to justify, and even command, the killing of “apostates” who leave Islam (like former Dutch MP Ayaan Hirsi Ali), and of “blasphemers” (like Salman Rushdie), and of “infidels” in general and Jews and homosexuals in particular.

They have little to say about the numerous senior Islamic preachers who have savagely incited against Jews from their pulpits – often broadcast live on state-television – informing worshippers that Jews are descended from monkeys and dogs, are subhuman, and undeserving of life.

They have little to say about the Koranic commands for amputating hands, for public floggings and beheadings, and for wife-beating, let alone about the lack of freedom of worship afforded to other faiths in countries like Saudi Arabia. They have little to say about the suicide bomb attacks on Christians, Jews, Hindus and others carried out in the name of Islam.

Here are a few news items from recent days:

SAUDI RELIGIOUS POLICE BAN CATS AND DOGS

Saudi Arabia’s religious police, who usually spend their time making sure women cover themselves, men attend prayers and that married men and women don’t mix, have a new rule to enforce. They have issued a decree banning the sale of cats and dogs in the Red Sea port city of Jiddah and in the holy city of Mecca because “some youths have been buying them and parading them in public,” according to a memo from the Municipal Affairs Ministry, republished by the Associated Press.

No other Arab country restricts pet ownership. Last year Iranian police urged people not to bring their dogs out in public, but this was never enshrined in law and was widely ignored by Iranian dog-owners.

The prohibition on dogs in Saudi Arabia does not come as a surprise, since conservative Muslims think dogs are unclean. The ban on cats has been questioned by some since Islamic tradition holds that the Prophet Mohammed loved cats and once let a cat drink from his ablutions water before washing himself for prayers.

NIGERIAN PICKPOCKET AT MECCA’S GRAND MOSQUE HAS HAND CUT OFF

A Nigerian man, convicted of stealing at the Grand Mosque in Mecca, has had his right hand severed.

Kurba Thani Mohammed was found guilty of “pickpocketing inside the Great Mosque,” according to a statement carried by the official Saudi government SPA news agency.

Saudi Arabia applies a strict form of Sharia (Islamic law) that provides for severing the hand for theft, and the death penalty for a host of other offenses.

GIRL, 6, BURNED TO DEATH IN “HONOR” KILLING IN ENGLAND

Alisha Begum, a six-year-old girl living in Birmingham, England, was killed in an arson attack on her home, Birmingham Crown Court heard yesterday. The attack was planned by Hussain Ahmed, a 26-year-old dentist, and Daryll Tuzzio, 18, after Ahmed found out his 15-year-old sister was seeing Alisha’s brother, Abdul Hamid, 21.

Birmingham Crown Court was told yesterday by prosecutor Adrian Redgrave: “One hears of so-called honor killings though one may wonder how by any stretch of the imagination there can be any honor in what happened here, resulting in the death of a six-year-old child.” For more, see here.

12-DAY GANG RAPE OF MOTHER/DAUGHTER FOR GOING TO COLLEGE

One of Australia’s leading papers reports that news of another horrific gang rape in Pakistan emerged over the weekend. A mother and daughter in a rural area were abducted and gang-raped for 12 days because the daughter refused to stop going to college in defiance of local Islamic custom. I have not seen this crime reported in most North American and European news media, many of which instead fill up their foreign news pages with articles critical only of America and Israel. For more see here.

RULER OF DUBAI ACCUSED OF CHILD TRAFFICKING

A suit has been filed in a Florida court alleging that the ruler of Dubai and his brother have enslaved around 30,000 children over the past 30 years for use as camel jockeys.

The defendants include Sheikh Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum, prime minister of the United Arab Emirates, and Sheikh Hamdan Bin Rashid Al Maktoum, the minister of finance and industry.

The brothers, who are among the world’s best-known racehorse owners, are accused of trafficking boys as young as 2 from Bangladesh, Sudan and southern Asia.

The claim is based on an international law banning slavery and child labor and was filed in Florida because the defendants own property there.

ISLAMISTS CLOSE SOMALI RADIO STATION FOR AIRING “LOVE SONGS”

Islamists in control of large parts of southern Somalia shut down a radio station for airing “music and love songs.” Radio Jowhar was closed last week after Sheikh Mohammed Abdirahman ordered that playing “music and love songs for the people” was un-Islamic and would be banned.

The station has since resumed broadcasting on condition it no longer plays any music or jingles. It was the only radio station in Jowhar, 55 miles from the Somali capital, Mogadishu. Elsewhere in Somalia, radio stations are still broadcasting normally, playing all kinds of music, including western hip-hop and R ‘n’ B.

Since capturing a large swathe of southern Somalia (including the capital) in June, Islamic groups have imposed strict Sharia rule. Islamists in Mogadishu have banned the watching of films, and broken up wedding celebrations where bands were playing music and women and men were seen socializing together.

During the recent soccer World Cup, Islamist gunmen in Somalia pulled the plug on makeshift cinemas airing the soccer tournament. For more, see Banning the World Cup, Israeli wine labels, and other items (June 14, 2006).

ISLAMIC CONFERENCE: MUSLIMS MUST BUY UP WESTERN MEDIA

Almost none of the above stories received much coverage in mainstream western media, which tends to be dominated by journalists with leftist opinions who wish to avoid reporting on human rights abuses in the Muslim world. However, it seems government ministers from Islamic countries would like to see even less western coverage.

Information ministers and officials meeting under the auspices of the 57-nation Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), the world’s largest Islamic body, were told at a conference in Saudi Arabia last Wednesday that Muslim tycoons should buy stakes in global media outlets to help change reporting on Muslims around the world.

“Muslim investors must invest in the large media institutions of the world so that they have the ability to affect their policies via their administrative boards,” the chief of the OIC, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, said.

He added that “This would benefit in terms of correcting the image of Islam worldwide.” He called on Muslim countries to set up more television channels in widely-spoken foreign languages.

Billionaire Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal already has a sizeable stake in News Corp., the Rupert Murdoch-run group which owns the Fox News Channel.

Egyptian Information Minister Anas el-Feki also told the OIC: “Now more than ever we need a new Islamic media message that reaches all parts of the world.”

SUICIDE BOMBING SPREADS

The phenomena of the suicide bomb, which some in the west (such as Tony Blair’s wife Cherie) were almost sympathetic to when its prime victims were Israelis*, continues to spread to more and more countries. On Monday, Somalia became the latest country to witness its first suicide bomb attack, during which the Somalian president survived an assassination attempt. Five members of the president’s entourage died in the blast in the central Somalian city of Baidoa.

“The assassination attempt today in Baidoa is associated with what happened in Mogadishu on Sunday where the Catholic nun was killed in the cold blood. Whoever was behind that attack is also behind this,” the Somali foreign minister said.

* One prominent western politician who continues to offer encouragement to Palestinian suicide bombers is Dr. Jenny Tonge, a prominent parliamentarian for the British Liberal Democratic party who on Tuesday at the annual Lib Dem Conference reiterated her support for suicide bombings in Israel. She also made anti-Semitic comments, which as British journalist and commentator Stephen Pollard points out could have come straight out of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

For more on Tonge, see For and against: the British MP who would be a suicide bomber, (Jan. 26, 2004).

GADDAFI’S SON: POPE MUST CONVERT TO ISLAM “IMMEDIATELY”

The elder son of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi has told Pope Benedict XVI that he must convert to Islam “immediately,” dismissing Sunday’s apology from the pontiff for supposedly offending Muslims.

“If this person were really someone reasonable, he would not agree to remain at his post one minute, but would convert to Islam immediately,” Mohammed Gaddafi told an awards ceremony in Tripoli for an international competition to memorize the Koran. “We say to the pope – whether you apologize or not is irrelevant, as apologies make no difference to us.”

Gaddafi junior also hit out at “those Muslims who look for comfort in the words of a non-Muslim”. He said Muslims “should not look for charity from the infidel... but should fight Islam’s enemies who attack the faith and the Prophet Mohammed.”

AL-QAEDA “LEADER” CLAIMS BEHEADING OF SUDAN NEWSPAPER EDITOR

While Islamist-backed Arab militias continue to carry out mass killings verging on genocide in the Darfur region of southern Sudan, other atrocities are taking place elsewhere in the country.

Abu Hafs al-Sudani, who says he is the leader of an African branch of al-Qaeda, has claimed responsibility for the beheading of a Sudanese newspaper editor last week.

A statement by al-Sudani called the beheaded editor, Mohammed Taha a “dog of dogs from the ruling party,” and accused him of insulting the prophet Mohammed.

Last year Taha reprinted a series of articles questioning the roots of the Prophet Mohammed. He was kidnapped from outside his home in Khartoum, and beheaded last Wednesday. The north of Sudan is under Sharia law.

For commentary on the mass killings in the south, see Sudan genocide 2: Where’s Sean Penn when you need him? Where’s the ISM?, (Aug. 9, 2004), and other previous dispatches.

AL-QAEDA THREATENS FRANCE

Al-Qaeda has for the first time announced a union with the Algerian insurgent “Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat,” which is known by its French initials GSPC, and has designated France as an enemy. They say they will act together against French and American targets.

Al-Qaeda No. 2 Ayman al-Zawahiri announced the “blessed union” in the most recent al-Qaeda video posted on the internet to mark the fifth anniversary of 9/11. Al-Zawahiri said “All the praise is due to Allah for the blessed union which we ask Allah to be as a bone in the throats of the Americans and French Crusaders and their allies, and inspire distress, concern and dejection in the hearts of the traitorous, apostate sons of France.”

Nicolas Sarkozy, the French interior minister, said “We take these threats very seriously.” He added that the threat to France was “high” and “permanent,” and that “absolute vigilance” was required. France’s leaders have warned previously that the decision not to join the U.S.-led war in Iraq would not shield the country from Islamic terrorism.

In an article published on September 14, the French daily Le Figaro confirmed that the French secret services believe that there are several dozen Algerian GSPC terrorist cells in France. Le Figaro said GSPC is in deep difficulties in Algeria but is gaining strength in Europe. The French authorities are worried about the consequences of their policies aiming at a national reconciliation in Algeria. Since the beginning of 2006, more than 2,000 prisoners (including former members of the armed Islamist group GIA) have been freed.

(For more, in French, see this article in Le Figaro. There is a slightly shorter version in English here.)

40 KILLED IN YEMEN STAMPEDE

At least 40 people were killed when a political meeting in Yemen ended and too many people tried to exit from a single door. Another 100 people were injured at the rally addressed by President Ali Abdallah Salih in the run-up to the upcoming presidential election.

Separately, four French tourists were kidnapped in Yemen last Sunday. It is the latest in a series of hostage takings as the Abdallah tribe attempts the release of many of its members from government detention.

Yemeni authorities have announced that they prevented a double suicide-bombing on oil refineries in the country. The announcement last Friday came two days after al-Qaeda had warned it intended to carry out attacks against Arab states in the Persian Gulf region. According to the Sana news agency, four would-be bombers, on their way to two oil and gas facilities, were intercepted and killed. One security officer also died.

HEAD OF MUSLIM COUNCIL OF BRITAIN WARNS OF 2 M. TERRORISTS

Mohammed Abdul Bari, the secretary-general of Britain’s main Muslim group, the Muslim Council of Britain, has blamed “some police officers and sections of the media” for “demonizing Muslims, treating them as if they’re all terrorists – and that encourages other people to do the same.” Bari also told The Sunday Telegraph that if the supposed “demonization” continues then “Britain will have to deal with two million Muslim terrorists – 700,000 of them in London.”

HIZBULLAH ANNOUNCES “VICTORY RALLY” TOMORROW

Hizbullah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah has set this Friday evening, while Israelis are celebrating the Jewish new year, as the time to hold a massive rally celebrating Hizbullah’s “victory” over Israel in 34 days of warfare. Nasrallah, who has been in hiding since the start of the war, said the rally would “celebrate the divine and historic victory over the Zionists.”

For more on the aftermath of the recent Hizbullah-Israel war, see “The Arabs have become wise enough to know TV victory from real victory” (Sept. 5, 2006).

REPORT: FREED TERRORISTS KILLED 132 ISRAELIS AFTER RELEASE

Hizbullah is demanding that Israel release prisoners, including convicted terrorists.

A new report issued by an Israeli NGO reveals that 132 Israelis were killed by terrorists who had previously been released from Israeli jails between 1993 and 1999. Israel had released these terrorists under UN and international pressure, including that from the Clinton administration in the United States.

The report by the Almagor Terror Victims Association listed 14 specific attacks perpetrated by released terrorists, including some of the most notorious incidents in recent years.

SADDAM RAGES AGAINST “AGENTS OF ZIONISM”

Saddam Hussein attacked Kurdish survivors giving evidence at his genocide trial in Baghdad last week. Saddam and six other defendants are accused of killing up to 180,000 Kurds during “Operation Anfal” in 1987 and 1988. Saddam accused Kurds who survived the massacres, and are now testifying about how their wives and children had been gassed to death by Saddam, as “agents of Zionism.”

ASSOCIATED PRESS EMPLOYEE “SPIED FOR SADDAM”

An Iraqi Intelligence officer’s report to different Iraqi Intelligence Directorates referring to secret information provided to them from a trusted source who works for the Associated Press, has been made public. The information was about the formation of a new UN weapons inspectors team called UNMOVIC. For more, see www.americanthinker.com/comments.php?comments_id=6058.

-- Tom Gross


Cartoonists against the Pope

September 19, 2006

CONTENTS

1. Benedict XVI shoots and kills on al-Jazeera
2. A cartoon from Australia
3. And the pope with a swastika
4. And the pope connected to a fuse
5. Not your usual messages by the Cathedral
6. Danish newspaper reprints Iranian Holocaust cartoons
7. Greek government includes Iranian Holocaust cartoonist
8. “Night of Bush (and Blair) capturing”



* Update: Some of the cartoons referred to in this dispatch have since been removed by the various websites linked to here.

[Note by Tom Gross]

As an update to yesterday’s dispatch Palestinians attack churches as anti-Pope sentiment grows around world, here is some more reaction to the pope’s comments on Islam in cartoon form:

BENEDICT XVI SHOOTS AND KILLS ON AL-JAZEERA

Last night, one of the main Italian TV news programs, TG5, showed in its evening prime-time edition an animated cartoon which had been put online by al-Jazeera. The cartoon shows former Pope John Paul II taking white doves out of a box where it is written “religious harmony.” His successor, Benedict XVI then fires a rifle, and kills the doves. To see the cartoon, accompanied by music and gunfire click here from Italy.

And here directly from al-Jazeera.

Il Corriere della Sera, reports that the cartoon was created by Shujaat Ali, a Pakistani cartoonist, the recipient of many prizes from his country as well from Japan and Iran. He now works for al-Jazeera. Another of his recent animated cartoons, dedicated to the Israeli-Lebanese crisis, shows a journalist interviewing the Statue of Liberty that has the face of U.S. President George W. Bush, holding a mini-Ehud Olmert setting fire to the Middle East.

A CARTOON FROM AUSTRALIA

This cartoon from “The Australian” newspaper, reproduced here on this Australian blog, has a different viewpoint to that of Shujaat Ali.

It is also available by clicking on number 2 in the “bleak” gallery here.

AND THE POPE WITH A SWASTIKA

The front page of the new edition of the Egyptian weekly Ruz al-Yusuf includes a cartoon of the pope with a swastika round his neck. The cartoon accompanied an article about the heads of the Egyptian Coptic Church attacking the pope’s comments. The cartoon can be seen here.

Other cartoons of the pope made to look like Hitler were found on Islamist websites by the journalist Hamza Boccolini and published by the Italian daily Libero (subscription only). The cartoons have been put online for free by Informazione Corretta and can be seen at the bottom of this page.

AND THE POPE CONNECTED TO A FUSE

The Jordanian website, “mahjoob,” which along with other Arab and European media is monitored specially for this email list/website, has a cartoon of the pope attached to one of the Danish Mohammed cartoons, the one that depicts the prophet with a turban and has a fuse attached. The Jordanian cartoonist connects the pope to the fuse. The speech bubble above the pope says (translated from the Arabic): “This is not my opinion, but a quotation only.” Many of the cartoons on this website are often featured in Arabic-language newspapers, for example the London-based Palestinian daily al-Quds al-Arabi.

The cartoon can be seen here.

For more on the Danish cartoon controversy, see:

* Portraying the prophet from Persian art to South Park, (Feb. 6, 2006)

* “To be or not to be, that is the question,” not just asked by a famous fictional Dane, (Feb. 7, 2006)

* Belgium Muslim leader calls on Arabs to use Danish flag as a substitute for toilet paper, (Feb.6, 2006)

NOT YOUR USUAL MESSAGES BY THE CATHEDRAL

You may also want to watch this demonstration outside Westminster Cathedral in London last Sunday, in which British Muslim extremists call for the execution of the pope: www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyMbYlCHXLY&eurl=

DANISH NEWSPAPER REPRINTS IRANIAN HOLOCAUST CARTOONS

Meanwhile, “Information,” a Danish newspaper, has printed six of the anti-Semitic cartoons about the Holocaust, which were commissioned for an Iranian exhibition recently. The cartoons had been on display in Teheran. Editor-in-chief of “Information,” Palle Weis, said he thought the cartoons were “tasteless but predictable.” The newspaper said he wanted to “even out” the Mohammed cartoons. But as I have noted before, the “Mohammed cartoons” were fair comments about people who themselves gloriously invoke Mohammed and Allah to kill civilians, whereas the Holocaust is a historical fact, and to compare the two types of cartoon is itself a form of Holocaust revisionism and anti-Semitism.

GREEK GOVERNMENT INCLUDES IRANIAN HOLOCAUST CARTOONIST

The small remaining Greek Jewish community (Greek Jews suffered particularly harshly during the Holocaust and were all but wiped out) have expressed disbelief after the Greek Culture Ministry last week decided to include an Iranian artist involved in a recent “competition” caricaturing the Nazi Holocaust, as a judge in a contest entitled: “The Cartoon as a Bridge Between Civilizations.”

The inclusion of Massud Shojai, the head of Iran Cartoon, the group that co-sponsored a (Nazi) Holocaust Cartoon contest that demeaned the victims of history’s worst genocide, has left Greek Jews in despair. Greece is a member of the European Union.

“NIGHT OF BUSH (AND BLAIR) CAPTURING”

A new game by al-Qaeda’s media arm GIMF (Global Islamic Media Front) has been announced, according to my sources that monitor terrorist groups. The trailer, which reads “Night of Bush capturing,” (but also shows a picture of Tony Blair) can be downloaded through www.alnusra.net/vb/showthread.php?t=6292.

And the “game” is here: hewar.khayma.com/showthread.php?t=57490

-- Tom Gross


Palestinians attack churches as anti-Pope sentiment grows around world

September 18, 2006

* Iranian newspaper says Zionists behind pope’s comments
* Mujahedeen Army threatens suicide attack against “the dog of Rome”
* Effigies of Benedict XVI burned in demonstrations in Basra today
* Egyptian, Saudi religious leaders say pope’s apology “not enough”

 

CONTENTS

1. Five churches in West Bank & Gaza attacked
2. Mujahedeen army threatens pope
3. Italian nun murdered by Islamists
4. European politicians defend pope; New York Times criticizes him
5. Arab media: “The pope’s comments may lead to war”
6. Iranian newspapers says U.S. and Israel behind pope’s comments
7. Christians blame media distortion for Muslim violence
8. Pope also offends Jews
9. “Why the Pope was right” (Times of London, Sept. 18, 2006)
10. “The historical truth” (Corriere della Sera, Sept. 15, 2006)



[Note by Tom Gross]

FIVE CHURCHES IN WEST BANK & GAZA ATTACKED

Palestinians wielding guns and firebombs attacked five churches in the West Bank and Gaza over the weekend. The fire bombings at Nablus’ Anglican and Greek Orthodox churches left trails of black scorch marks. Church doors were charred and walls were pockmarked with bullet holes. Separately, a group of masked gunmen doused the main doors of Nablus’ Roman and Greek Catholic churches with lighter fluid and set them afire.

A group calling itself the “Lions of Monotheism” claimed responsibility; they said the attacks were to protest Pope Benedict XVI’s remarks last week which some claim were offensive to Islam.

In supposedly impoverished Gaza, a Greek Orthodox Church came under gunfire from a car, this only a day after explosive devices were set off in the same church.

Palestinian Christians are already under great pressure from the Islamic-led Palestinian Authority, but the Western media (despite having many Christians among their readers) rarely report on this, preferring to highlight Israeli actions.

On Tuesday, in one small passage from a lengthy speech in German, Pope Benedict XVI quoted a 14th-century Byzantine emperor who characterized some of the teachings of the Prophet Mohammed, Islam’s founder, as “evil and inhuman.”

The pope yesterday apologized, following the angry reaction to his remarks. At his summer palace outside Rome, he told pilgrims “these (words) were in fact a quotation from a medieval text which do not in any way express my personal thought.”

He continued “At this time I wish also to add that I am deeply sorry for the reactions in some countries to a few passages of my address at the University of Regensburg, which were considered offensive to the sensibility of Muslims.”

On Saturday, Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone issued a statement explaining the pontiff’s remarks, apologizing and insisting that the church “esteems Muslims.”

MUJAHEDEEN ARMY THREATENS POPE

Efforts by Pope Benedict XVI to assuage anger in the Muslim world caused by his comments appear to have had little effect. Over 1,000 people demonstrated in the Iraqi city of Basra today, and effigies of Benedict were burned.

The Mujahedeen Army, an Iraqi terrorist group which has claimed responsibility for scores of attacks in Iraq, threatened the Vatican with a suicide attack over the pope’s remarks about Islam. Addressing “the dog of Rome,” they threatened to “shake your thrones and break your crosses in your home.” The message, posted on a website also said “we swear to God to send you people who adore death as much as you adore life.”

The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt has also demanded “a personal apology [from the pope]. We feel that he has committed a grave error against us and that this mistake will only be removed through a personal apology,” Muslim Brotherhood Deputy Leader Mohammed Habib told Reuters.

On Friday night, 2,000 Palestinians angrily protested against the pope in Gaza City, accusing him of leading a new crusade against the Muslim world. Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh sent a message to the protestors saying Pope Benedict XVI had offended Muslims everywhere.

ITALIAN NUN MURDERED BY ISLAMISTS

According to the Turin-based daily La Stampa, a hard-line Somali cleric called on Muslims to “hunt down” and kill the pope. Following this call a 65-year-old Italian nun working in Somalia was shot and killed yesterday in Mogadishu. According to the leading Italian national daily, Il Corriere della Sera, the nun was killed by members of a pro-Taliban group as a response to the pope’s lecture in Germany. The nun had been working at a children’s hospital in north Mogadishu.

Lebanon’s most senior Shi’ite Muslim cleric, Grand Ayatollah Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah, told worshippers during his Friday prayers sermon: “We call on the pope to carry out a scientific and fastidious reading of Islam. We do not want him to succumb to the propaganda of the enemy led by Judaism.”

Salih Kapusuz, deputy leader of Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s Islamic-rooted party, said Friday that Benedict “is going down in history in the same category as leaders such as Hitler and Mussolini.”

The Moroccan Foreign Ministry recalled its ambassador to the Holy See in protest over the pope’s remarks. On Friday, Pakistan’s parliament unanimously adopted a resolution condemning the pope for what it called “derogatory” comments about Islam.

Al-Qaeda in Iraq cited a hadith (a saying of the Prophet Mohammed) promising Muslims they would “conquer Rome ... as they conquered Constantinople.” Also on Saturday, an Iranian-based terrorist group threatened suicide attacks against the Vatican.

On Friday evening, 50,000 Israeli Arabs at the 11th annual congress of the Israeli Islamic Movement, in the northern Israeli town of Umm al-Fahm, heard Sheikh Raλd Salah tell them “Soon Jerusalem will be the capital of the new Muslim caliphate.”

EUROPEAN POLITICIANS DEFEND POPE. NEW YORK TIMES CRITICIZES HIM

While European Muslims were quick to attack the pope’s words, the continent’s political leaders declined to follow. “Whoever criticizes the pope misunderstood the aim of his speech,” German Chancellor Angela Merkel said in an interview with the German newspaper Bild. “What Benedict XVI emphasized was a decisive and uncompromising renunciation of all forms of violence in the name of religion,” she explained.

Italian European parliament vice president Mario Mauro condemned as “monstrous” the manipulation of the pope’s remarks by Islamic leaders which he claimed were used to “hit out at Christians and the West.”

Some western liberal media though criticized the pope. The New York Times editorialized on Saturday that the pope must give a “deep and persuasive” apology for his remarks. “The world listens carefully to the words of any pope. And it is tragic and dangerous when one sows pain, either deliberately or carelessly,” it said.

ARAB MEDIA: “THE POPE’S COMMENTS MAY LEAD TO WAR”

Opinion articles in Arabic-language newspapers have been filled with strong rhetoric over the pope’s comments. Writing in the London-based Arabic-language daily Al-Hayat, Hani Pahas said “We fear that the pope’s statements may lead to a war that we, Muslims and Christians alike, are trying to prevent through dialogue between East and West.”

The pope has in recent days been compared to both Osama bin Laden and Hitler. Hussein Shabakshy, writing in al-Sharq al-Awsat, another London-based Arabic-language daily, commented that: “It is clear that such remarks only contribute to the fueling of the fire raging between Islam and the West. There is no difference between Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri speaking from their caves in Tora Bora and the stage of an important Christian saint. Both parties contribute to the world verbal weapons of mass destruction.”

Shabakshy continued, “These are ignorant comments previously made by Adolf Hitler, who spoke of a supreme white race against all the other races, especially the African race,” he added, ignoring the fact that most of Hitler’s venom was directed at Jews.

IRANIAN NEWSPAPERS SAYS U.S. AND ISRAEL BEHIND POPE’S COMMENTS

The Iranian daily Jomhuri Islami claimed that Israel and the United States dictated the pope’s comments to distract attention from the recent war between Israel and Hizbullah.

The newspaper commented that “the reality is that if we do not consider Pope Benedict XVI to be ignorant of Islam, then his remarks against Islam are a dictat that the Zionists and the Americans have written (for him) and have submitted to him… The American and the Zionist aim is to undermine the glorious triumph of Islam’s children of Lebanese Hizbullah, which annulled the undefeatable legend of the Israeli army and foiled the Satanic and colonialist American plot.”

Another Iranian daily newspaper, Kayhan, argued that “There are many signs that show that Pope Benedict XVI’s remarks regarding the great prophet of Islam are a link in a connected chain of a Zionist-American project… The project, which was created and executed by the Zionist minority, aims at creating confrontation between the followers of the two great divine religions.”

CHRISTIANS BLAME MEDIA DISTORTION FOR MUSLIM VIOLENCE

Some Christian leaders and theologians have blamed certain sections of the Western media for distorting Pope Benedict’s comments. For example, Father David Neuhaus, professor of Scripture at the Roman Catholic Seminary in Beit Jalla, argued that the western secular liberal media “ripped” the pope’s statement about Islam out of context.

He said “The pope’s speech was about how there was no room for violence in the relationship between reason and faith, and his message was directed primarily at secularism, not Islam.”

POPE ALSO OFFENDS JEWS

Barely minutes after saying he was “deeply sorry” about the reaction to his earlier remarks on Islam yesterday, the pope cited a passage from the New Testament highlighting the gulf between Christian and Jewish attitudes to the crucifixion of Jesus.

The Pope quoted St. Paul, the New Testament author most often accused of anti-Semitism, saying “We preach the crucified Christ – a scandal for the Jews, a folly for the pagans.”

In response, Rabbi Dr Jonathan Romain, a member of the board of the Council of Christians and Jews, a group set up to oppose prejudice between different religions and races, said “The pope has every right to quote his own holy texts, but it may be unwise in the current climate to choose those which relate to other faiths.”

The rabbi added that “it is especially important that anyone who does protest does so verbally, not physically, otherwise they put themselves even more at fault.”

***

I attach two articles below. In the first, William Rees-Mogg says “Islam has only partially experienced the modern process of enlightenment and reform, which was, after all, resisted by a number of pre-Vatican II popes. Pope Benedict will have done Islam a service if he has started a debate within Islam and between Islam and the critics.”

The second article is written by Magdi Allam, the Egyptian-born deputy-editor of Italy’s highest circulation newspaper, Corriere della Sera. “Why do not Muslims, especially the so-called moderates, react with strength and intensity against the real and eternal desecrators of Islam – that is, the Islamic terrorists who kill other Muslims in the name of the same God, radical Muslims who legitimize the destruction of Israel and brainwash ordinary Muslims into martyrdom?” he asks.

-- Tom Gross

 

FULL ARTICLES

“JOURNALISTS SHOULD NOT CRITICISE POPE BENEDICT XVI”

Why the Pope was right
By William Rees-Mogg
The Times of London
September 18, 2006

www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,1052-2362630,00.html

Journalists should not criticise Pope Benedict XVI for his lecture at Regensburg. He has done only what every sub-editor on the Daily Mail does every day. Confronted with a long and closely written text, he inserted a lively quote to draw attention to the argument. We all do it. Sometimes the quote causes trouble, but more often it opens up an argument that is needed.

The question is not whether the quotation from the Byzantine emperor Manuel II Palaeologus is offensive: it is.

The question is whether the emperor is justified in what he said. His main thrust was at least partly justified. There is a real problem about the teaching of the Koran on violence against the infidel. That existed in the 14th century, and was demonstrated on 9/11, 2001. There is every reason to discuss it. I am more afraid of silence than offence.

The Pope’s actual quotation is not just a medieval point of view. It is a common modern view; even if it seldom reaches print; it can certainly be found on the internet. “Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and then you shall find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.”

Is it true that the Koran contains such a command, and has it influenced modern terrorists? The answers, unfortunately, are “yes” and “yes”.

The so-called Sword Verse from Chapter 9 must have been in the emperor’s mind: “So when the sacred months have passed away, Then slay the idolaters wherever you find them.

“And take them captive and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in every ambush.”

This does shock many Muslims: extremists are angered by the implied criticism of those who quote it, while moderates who cannot disavow the terms of the Koran prefer more evasive interpretations. The shock it creates shows the importance of the doctrine.

One man who does not question the meaning of the verse is Osama bin Laden. His attitude is discussed at some length in Chapter 14 of an excellent new book, The Qur’an, a Biography, by Bruce Lawrence, who is the Professor of Islamic Studies at Duke University, North Carolina. Lawrence observes the use of this verse as a central argument for jihad in Bin Laden’s manifesto in 1996; that was a declaration of war against native and foreign infidels.

Lawrence makes several relevant points. Bin Laden selects only those verses that fit his message, and then cites them exclusively for his own purposes. He ignores both their original context and also the variety of historical differences between committed Muslims about how to apply their dicta. He collapses the broad spectrum of Koranic teaching into a double requirement: first to believe; and then to fight.

Lawrence also draws attention to the qualifications that surround the Sword Verse; particularly that those infidels who repent should be allowed to go free: “For God is most forgiving; most merciful.”

It is impossible to reconcile the consistent Koranic teaching that God is most merciful with suicide bombing, which is indiscriminate and murders faithfuls and infidels alike.

It is a mistake to think that all the major religions are identical: they have real differences of doctrine that have real impacts on human society. What is true, however, is that no religion shall survive for more than a generation or two unless it has a substantial element of truth in it. The diabolical cult of Nazism lasted for only one generation. It is natural for Christians of different denominations to love what they have in common without ceasing to be aware of their differences.

A Christian should also rejoice in the positive spiritual values of the other major religions. It is natural for a Christian to feel enriched by Judaism, which was the religion of Jesus; or by Platonism, the philosophy of the opening chapter of St John’s Gospel and of St Augustine. Yet Christians also find spiritual truths in Buddhism, Confucianism, Daoism, Hinduism, Sikhism and Islam itself. There is a significant link between aspects of Islamic Sufi mysticism and the Christian mystical tradition.

When one lists these religions it becomes obvious that there are two problems: violence and the influence of reason, both of which Pope Benedict identified in his lecture. Violence is a fault from which no major religion has historically been free. St Patrick’s conversion of Ireland is sometimes given as a unique example of the conversion of a nation without the loss of a single life. It is one of the great scandals that so many persecutions have taken place in the name of Jesus.

This has been more or less true of all the great religions: human beings are the most savage of beasts, and they will kill each other in any cause, however noble.

Yet nowadays Islam is the only major religion in which violence is a serious doctrinal issue. It is true that tribalised Roman Catholics and Protestants in Ireland have only recently stopped killing each other and vengeful Sikhs assassinated Indira Gandhi in India, but neither the Catholic nor the Protestant churches believe in terror; nor do the Sikhs.

A significant proportion of the Islamic community does believe that suicide bombers are martyrs carrying out a religious duty. Suicide bombing causes Islamophobia. There are varying degrees of authority and uniformity in different religions; rather low in most cases. This pluralism has its own virtues, but in Islam they are outweighed by the disadvantages. Those imams who preach al-Qaeda’s view of the duty of jihad are not required to answer to any authority, even the authority of reason.

Islam has only partially experienced the modern process of enlightenment and reform, which was, after all, resisted by a number of pre-Vatican II Popes. Pope Benedict will have done Islam a service if he has started a debate within Islam and between Islam and the critics.

 

“SAD AND WORRYING”

The historical truth
By Magdi Allam
Corriere della Sera
September 15, 2006

www.corriere.it/Primo_Piano/Editoriali/2006/09_Settembre/15/magd1.shtml

It is sad and worrying that Muslims have given birth to an international united front to attack the Pope and ask for public apologies. From Bin Laden to the Muslim Brotherhood, from Pakistan to Turkey, from al-Jazeera to al-Arabiya, the transversal and universal alliance, which has already come into being following the Danish cartoons affair, has reappeared. Reaffirming very clearly that the root of evil is like a blind and prevailing ideology which outrages the faith and darkens the minds of many Muslims.

Why do not Muslims, especially the so-called moderates, react with such strength and intensity against the real and eternal desecrators of Islam – that is, the Islamic terrorists who kill other Muslims in the name of the same God, radical Muslims who legitimize the destruction of Israel and brainwash ordinary Muslims into martyrdom? Why do they now believe they must start a kind of Islamic “holy war” against the head of the [Catholic] Church who has the right to respectfully express his views about Islam, all the while with clarity on the evident difference between the two religions?

The pope’s quoting the Byzantine Emperor Manuel II Paleologus, regarding the expansion of Islam through the sword, either during the time of Mohammed and on the Arab Peninsula and after him, elsewhere, underlines an undeniable historical truth. The Quran itself states it; furthermore, the forced conversion of the entire Byzantine Empire, to Islam in the East and South of Mediterranean, and the further expansion northwards in Europe and Eastwards in Asia, demonstrates the point made by the Byzantine Emperor. It is foolish to deny the truth, as it can only cause deranged reaction. In the mid-Nineties one of the most prominent scholars of Islamic studies, the Egyptian Mohammed said al-Ashmawi, told me that he did not approve the Arab tribes’ military conquest of Christian lands in the Mediterranean and that he would have preferred Islam to expand peacefully, like it did in South-Eastern Asia. The Pope is threatened because he has said things that every single honest and rational Muslim should accept: the historical truth.

Time has come for both the West and Christianity to stop thinking that they are the source of all that happens – good or evil – within Islam as well as around the world. The ideology of hate is an ancestral reality at the core of Islam; it has been so since its inception, due to its’ refusal to recognize and respect the plurality of religious communities – a natural thing since in Islam the relationship between the believer and God is personal and there is no unique spiritual guide who embodies the absolute dogmas of faith. In fact, since the defeat of the Arab armies in the June 5th, 1967 war, the situation has been worsening while Islamic extremism has been on the rise starting from Iran to Indonesia, to the point where the advance of global Islamic terrorism has turned the West into a “Kamikaze factory”.

This is the tragic truth of the ideology of hate which binds all Muslims who are obsessed with anti-Americanism, anti-West and the prejudicial denial of Israel’s right to exist. They are able to find many pretexts to rage – from Israeli occupation, to the U.S.-led coalition into Iraq, to the cartoons about Mohammed and even the Pope’s words. Nevertheless the problem is at the root of Islam itself, an Islam which extremists turned from a faith in God into an ideology aiming for a theocratic and totalitarian order to impose on everyone who is not like them. And I am really scared when I realize that even the so-called moderates have given in to a “holy war” where they will be the primary victims.


Something different from the BBC (& Black freedom movements meet in Israel)

September 14, 2006

CONTENTS

1. Black freedom movements meet in Israel
2. Finally, the BBC covers Israeli dead
3. No more “freedom fighters” on ABC
4. “Cancel Israel” stickers on London buses
5. Comedian apologizes for comments



[Note by Tom Gross]

BLACK FREEDOM MOVEMENTS MEET IN ISRAEL

In today’s Hebrew edition of Yediot Ahronot (on page 14), there is an amazing picture: a grandson of Nelson Mandela and a grandson of Martin Luther King meet for the first time and shake hands. They met in the northern Israeli town of Tiberias at the hotel of the Scottish Church. The former is on an official visit. Tiberias, on the Sea of Galilee, was recently hit by Hizbullah rockets.

FINALLY, THE BBC COVERS ISRAELI DEAD

Here is some news with a difference. Amnesty International has accused Hizbullah of war crimes for targeting Israeli civilians.

And the BBC ran this development this morning as their main item on the front of their world service home page, and on air on the world service. It links to this page: news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5343188.stm

By the time you read this, the home page may have changed. But it was top of the world service home page (www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice) at 02:15 GMT, 03:15 UK, on Thursday, September 14, 2006, although NOT on the top of the BBC Arabic home page at that time or since (news.bbc.co.uk/hi/arabic/news).

Furthermore, in the Arabic version, the BBC added changes that make the article more sympathetic to Hizbullah, adding some untrue anti-Israel propaganda comments from Hizbullah MP Hassan Fadlallah (news.bbc.co.uk/hi/arabic/news/newsid_5344000/5344374.stm).

In their English language (but not in their Arabic language) article, the statistics for Lebanese civilian and military dead have been reduced by the BBC to 1000. BBC correspondents and news announcers have previously (and wrongly) said 1400 Lebanese died.

Of course, we shouldn’t confuse today’s story with the still very poor coverage the BBC – and Amnesty – gives Israel elsewhere. By lunchtime today, BBC news was back to its old tricks, claiming that 140 Israelis were killed by Hizbullah rather than the 161 documented Israeli dead. The BBC wouldn’t reduce the numbers of British murdered in the July 7, 2005 London bomb attacks. (Or perhaps they would?)

For my previous criticism of BBC coverage, see The media war against Israel.

(The Guardian and other papers continue to make figures up concerning Lebanese dead. Last weekend The Guardian again ran a large photo of Qana – The Guardian has nothing else to write about – and said “more than 50 people died” there at Israeli hands. This is even though it is several weeks since the Lebanese Red Cross, the Lebanese government, Hizbullah and other western newspapers acknowledged that no more than 28 people died there.)

NO MORE “FREEDOM FIGHTERS” ON ABC

The Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) has decided to drop the term “freedom fighters” from its style guide when referring to Hamas and Hizbullah terrorists.

John Cameron, the ABC’s head of news, announced the changes to the style guide last week. Cameron reportedly described the old reference as “a note of caution and education rather than instruction.”

The change follows Cameron’s admission during a Senate Estimates Committee hearing in May that in certain circumstances, Hamas, Hizbullah and Islamic Jihad could justifiably be classed as “terrorists”.

Michael Ronaldson, a liberal Australian Senator commented that he was “pleased that the appalling failure of ABC journalists to label terrorists as terrorists appears to be coming to an end... We must not be afraid to label such acts as terrorism. We must not be afraid to describe such acts in moral terms as evil.”

In the past I have criticized ABC’s anti-Israel coverage so this change is welcome. Some Australian Jews have argued that the marked increase in anti-Semitic attacks in Australia recently has in part been the result of slanted coverage of the Middle East by ABC and other media.

Groups representing the Australian victims of terrorist attacks said the change in the style book was “a step in the right direction but not much more than that. The change to the editorial guidelines does not represent a full admission that people who target civilians for political motives are terrorists.”

“CANCEL ISRAEL” STICKERS ON LONDON BUSES

Stickers have been found on traditional red double-decker buses in London calling on readers to “cancel Israel” to achieve “peace in the Middle East”.

According to the sticker the “current crisis” was “started with the kidnap of some democratically elected Hamas (members) and the killing of 8 Palestinians picnicking on the beach.”

The stickers also accuse the media of “giving a false impression” of the Middle East conflict. The words “cancel Israel” are written on the middle of the sticker in a large font.

The sticker can be seen here.

The accusation that Israel killed 8 Palestinians on a Gaza beach earlier this year has been discredited, after shrapnel taken from an injured child was found by forensic experts not to have come from an Israeli shell. There is also no record of the IDF firing at the beach at the time the explosion took place. The media have failed to report this properly. (See