Tom Gross Mideast Media Analysis

First permanent foreign military force takes up positions in Israel (& a warm welcome on the Upper West Side)

September 29, 2008

* Defense News: new system hurried to Israel in recent days allows Israel to engage a nuclear- or conventionally-armed Iranian missile about halfway through what would be an 11-minute flight time from Iran.

* Please read the important information below on B’Tselem and keep this in mind next time The New York Times, CNN or BBC use them as a source.

* For light relief, there are links to satirical videos at the end of this dispatch.

 

CONTENTS

1. Gaza baby born in Israel to mother left brain dead by stroke
2. Egyptian slams Egyptian Health Ministry for barring Israeli drug his son needs
3. “U.S. delivers advanced high-powered radar system to Israel”
4. German FM finally blasts Ahmadinejad’s “blatant anti-Semitism”
5. Doubts about British Conservative party leadership
6. Left-wing rights group B’Tselem to establish U.S. office
7. Calling the bat mitzvah terrorist a “civilian”
8. Phony stats in B’Tselem press releases
9. Egypt, where one in six is homeless
10. New survey: American Jews favor Obama over McCain, but not by too much
11. New York’s Upper West Side shows its famous open-mindedness
12. Bill Clinton “endorses” John McCain


[All notes below by Tom Gross]

GAZA BABY BORN IN ISRAEL TO MOTHER LEFT BRAIN DEAD BY STROKE

A Gazan baby has been born in Israel to a mother left brain dead by a stroke. Last Tuesday, a Caesarian section was performed at the Barzilai Medical Center in Ashkelon on a woman from Gaza who had spent the last three months of her pregnancy in a vegetative state, brain dead after a stroke. She was transferred to Israel when Gazan doctors said they feared they would be unable to care for her at one of the local Gazan clinics.

The father, whom Israel’s Ha’aretz newspaper and Channel 10 news gave only the first name of (Mohammed), said the baby will be named Daniel after one of the Jewish doctors who made his birth possible. Mohammed and his comatose wife Vania (who was born in Bulgaria) have two other sons.

Barzilai Medical Center in the southern Israeli city of Ashkelon was one of the buildings targeted by Hamas rockets fired from Gaza earlier this year, even though Palestinians from Gaza are regularly treated there. (* For more, see the item “Palestinian twins born in Ashkelon as Hamas tries to kill them” in the dispatch “Saving Baby Mohammed,” March 16, 2008 )

 

EGYPTIAN SLAMS EGYPTIAN HEALTH MINISTRY FOR BARRING ISRAELI DRUG HIS SON NEEDS

The father of an Egyptian boy suffering from cystic fibrosis has criticized the Egyptian Ministry of Health in the state-owned Al-Ahram newspaper for preventing him from getting the Israeli drug Creon 1000.

“A little boy is suffering every day, and everyone is evading responsibility,” he wrote in a letter to the newspaper published last Saturday. “Israel is the only country in the world that produces a drug called Creon 1000, which serves as a substitute for one of the enzymes missing in those suffering from cystic fibrosis.”

But even though doctors recommended he obtain the medicine for his son, he was turned away by the Health Ministry on the grounds that the drug cannot be imported from Israel. Israel is willing to give the drug to Egypt, but the authorities in Cairo, who are supposed to have made peace with Israel three decades ago (the thirtieth anniversary of the Camp David accords was yesterday), are refusing.

In a rare challenge to the government which owns the paper, Al-Ahram published an article supporting the father’s position. The Muslim Brotherhood has slammed Al-Ahram for siding with the father.

Citizens of Arab Gulf states with no diplomatic relations with Israel regularly order Israeli drugs and ask for treatment from world-renowned experts from Israeli hospitals.

 

“U.S. DELIVERS ADVANCED HIGH-POWERED RADAR SYSTEM TO ISRAEL”

The United States has transferred to Israel a new high-powered radar system that will improve Israel’s reaction time to an Iranian missile strike, the well-informed Defense News magazine reported over the weekend.

According to the report, the U.S. European Command transported the system to Israel in a convoy of more than a dozen planes which carried the X-band radar and support crew. The planes and crew landed at Nevatim Air Force Base in southern Israel on September 21.

The Raytheon Co.-built system can track an object the size of a baseball from 4,700 kilometers away.

If it works, it would allow Israel’s Arrow missile to engage a nuclear- or conventionally-armed Iranian Shahab-3 ballistic missile about halfway through what would be an 11-minute flight from Iran, or up to three times sooner than Israel’s “Green Pine” radar can.

The 120-man American military support staff capable of using the system will remain in Israel, marking the first permanent U.S. military presence on Israeli soil.

The U.S. has previously deployed troops and Patriot air defense batteries for joint exercises and Iraq-related wartime contingencies, but has never before permanently deployed troops in Israel.

An IDF request yesterday to permit Israeli soldiers to control the new high-powered radar has been declined by the U.S.

***

I previously discussed the possibility of the U.S. supplying Israel with the X-band radar in this dispatch last May: Parting gift?: “Bush to offer Israel crucial new radar system” (& Iranian shell kills Israeli)

***

Tom Gross adds: Of course, there is no guarantee the system would work. The Patriot air defense batteries failed to protect Israel from being hit by scuds in the first Gulf War. And Israel is concerned at least as much by an enriched uranium “briefcase or knapsack” bomb supplied by Iran being detonated by a Hamas or Hizbullah suicide bomber in central Tel Aviv, potentially killing hundreds of thousands, as it is by a nuclear bomb delivered by missile.

Israel also has other existential concerns related to nuclear material in Iranian or militant Arab hands but not related to their being fired by missile, which I won’t divulge here.

 

GERMAN FM FINALLY BLASTS AHMADINEJAD’S “BLATANT ANTI-SEMITISM”

In Friday morning’s dispatch (Peres at UN: Ahmadinejad is a “disgrace to Islam” (& still no word on missing American in Iran)) I mentioned how slow non-American politicians had been to condemn Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s hateful speech at the United Nations General Assembly last Tuesday.

On Friday, Germany Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier finally blasted the Iranian president’s speech as “ intolerable and blatant anti-Semitism” and urged the 192 UN member states to join his condemnation of it. Few have done so.

British Foreign Secretary David Miliband also said on Friday “we will all have seen and must deplore the egregiously offensive comments of President Ahmadinejad.”

 

DOUBTS ABOUT BRITISH CONSERVATIVE PARTY LEADERSHIP

The British government’s position on Israel’s security and the Iranian nuclear threat are not as strong as those of the governments of the U.S., Canada and Australia.

However, I know from speaking to senior politicians of all parties in Britain (many of whom subscribe to this email list) that the positions and sentiments of the current Labour party Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, and his Foreign Secretary David Miliband, are considerably better than those of the Conservative opposition leader David Cameron and his shadow Foreign Secretary William Hague, both of whom have distanced themselves from any real sympathy with America and Israel and appear to be dangerously naïve about the threat of nuclear proliferation in countries where Islamist militants are liable to infiltrate the military.

The Conservative party is far ahead in British opinion polls and is likely to soon come to power. As a close ally of the U.S and as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, Britain remains an important power.

 

LEFT-WING RIGHTS GROUP B’TSELEM TO ESTABLISH U.S. OFFICE

The Jewish left is further bolstering its position in the U.S. After the introduction of the new J Street lobby, aimed at countering AIPAC, B’Tselem, the left-wing human rights organization based in Israel, has sent two official staffers to Washington and New York for the first time. Jewish left-wing activists are said to be buoyed by what they believe will be an impending Obama presidency’s willingness to put significant pressure on Israel.

The well-funded self-described human rights organization B’Tselem has sent out invitations welcoming journalists and politicians to a Capitol Hill reception.

According to their press release, the B’Tselem staffers “intend to inform the policy makers, American public and the American Jewish community about human rights conditions in the Palestinian territories.”

The B’Tselem board consists of nine far-left Israeli academics, some of who believe in the so-called one state solution which would see Jews live as a minority in a future Palestinian state.


CALLING THE BAT MITZVAH TERRORIST A “CIVILIAN”

Writing last week on the website of Yediot Ahronot, Israel’s biggest selling daily, Tamar Sternthal pointed out:

“Human rights group B’Tselem’s statistics are far from being trustworthy.

“On Jan. 17, 2002, Abdul Salaam Sadek Hassouneh of Nablus burst into a bat mitzvah celebration at a Hadera reception hall, shooting dead six Jews [including children] and injuring 35 before Israeli security forces ended the bloodbath by killing him.

“But Hassouneh has another, lesser known claim to notoriety. He was the first of several Palestinian terrorists killed while attacking Israelis to appear that year in B’Tselem’s list of ‘Palestinian civilians killed by Israeli security forces.’ He was followed by numerous other so-called Palestinian ‘civilians’ in 2002, including Omar Mahmoud Abu Rub and Yusef Muhammad Abu Rub, killed by border police gunfire after they murdered six Israeli civilians in Beit She’an. Both attacks were claimed by Fatah’s al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades.”

B’Tselem’s unreliable statistics are already regularly used by prominent American media such as The New York Times to try and make it look like Israel has killed more Palestinian civilians than it has.

If you search The New York Times’s online archive, you can see the Times has relied on information from B’Tselem in as many as 1,180 articles in recent years.

Now B’Tselem is likely to have even more impact in Washington and New York, even though their information is unreliable.


PHONY STATS IN B’TSELEM PRESS RELEASES

Here are a few more of the many examples of B’Tselem misleading journalists and the public alike, as related by Sternthal in Yediot Ahronot:

* Take for instance, the case of 11-year-old Muhammad Ali Abu al-Wafa, killed on Dec. 31, 2007 in Khan Younis. B’Tselem lists him as one of those killed by Israeli security forces, although he actually died in Hamas-Fatah clashes, a fact undisputed by Palestinian sources such as the Palestinian Center for Human Rights and Ma’an News Agency.

* B’Tselem reports that Muhammad Zaki Jum’ah al-Najar, killed on Nov. 20, 2007 in Khan Younis, “did not participate in hostilities when killed.” Yet, Hamas’ English website boasts that “today, al-Qassam Brigades mourn the death of the mujahim (fighter): Mohammed Zaki al Najjar. The mujahid was martyred during a clash with the Zionist occupation forces.”

* B’Tselem carries an unusually brief listing for Fahmi Abd al-Jawad Hussein a-Darduk, 15, of Nablus, killed on May 19, 2008 “by gunfire.” B’Tselem does not specify that he was “killed while participating in hostilities” even though he was carrying explosives and ignored soldiers orders to stop and raise his hands at a checkpoint when he was killed.

* From B’Tselem’s literature, one would have no idea that Bilal Hamuda Muhammad Saleh, supposedly “killed while sleeping in a car” on April 17, 2008 was the head of Islamic Jihad in Qabatiya, or that Muhammad Shhadeh Abed Shhadeh (a-Ta’amari), killed on March 12, 2008 in the Tulkarm district, headed Islamic Jihad in Bethlehem.


B’TSELEM BOARD MEMBERS

David Kretzmer, Professor of Law, Hebrew University
Anat Biletzki, Professor of Philosophy, Tel-Aviv University
Orna Ben-Naftaly, Head of the Law School, College of Management Academic Studies.
Tamar Hermann, Dean of Academic Studies, the Open University of Israel
Menachem Klein, Lecturer in Political Science, Bar Ilan University
Alla Shainskaya, Senior Staff Scientist, Weizmann Institute of Science
Oren Yiftachel, professor of political geography and urban planning, Ben-Gurion Univ.
Menachem Fisch, Professor of the History and Philosophy of Science, Tel Aviv University and Senior Fellow, Shalom Hartman Institute
Rayef Zreik. Co-founder of Adalah, The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel; lecturer at the Faculty of Law, Tel Aviv University

 

EGYPT, WHERE ONE IN SIX IS HOMELESS

We will probably never know how many people were killed in the rockslide earlier this month in a slum neighborhood on the outskirts of Cairo because the Egyptian government refuses to make statistics available, and the international media and phony western “human rights” groups don’t seem very interested in investigating. Locals say the death toll probably reached 500.

Although the media, UN and NGOs relentlessly focus on what they regularly call the “humanitarian catastrophe” in Gaza, in fact life in Gaza is much better than life for millions in neighboring Egypt.

According to Manal Tibi, the director of the Egyptian Center for Housing Rights, one in six Egyptians (i.e. between 12 and 15 million people) is homeless, and in Cairo alone two million people live in the streets and even in cemeteries.

 

NEW SURVEY: AMERICAN JEWS FAVOR OBAMA OVER MCCAIN, BUT NOT BY TOO MUCH

The annual survey published by the American Jewish Committee on Thursday revealed that American Jewish voters favor Barack Obama over John McCain for U.S. president by a margin of 57-30 percent, with 13 percent saying they are still undecided.

While Obama leads McCain by 27 points, his numbers are considerably lower than those of Bill Clinton, Al Gore and John Kerry, each of whom received over 75 percent of the Jewish vote.

Apart from African-Americans, Jews are traditionally the most left-wing voting block in the U.S. A higher percentage of gays, Hispanics and Arab-Americans vote Republican than Jews do.

While Jews make up just 2 percent of the American population, 4 percent of votes in elections are cast by American Jews since Jewish turnout is much higher than other groups. And a whopping 20 percent of all campaign contributions are made by American Jews. In the crucial swing states of Florida, Pennsylvania and Ohio, the Jewish vote is considered particularly important.

Many American Jews say they are very concerned about the positions of Obama and his foreign policy advisors on Israel and Iran, but as with other voters, the economy and domestic issues top their list of priorities, according to polls.

 

THE UPPER WEST SIDE SHOWS ITS FAMOUS OPEN-MINDEDNESS

Certainly on New York’s Upper West Side, it doesn’t seem that John McCain will have much support, if we judge by the altogether illiberal reaction local residents gave a group of McCain supporters last week, as seen here.

You might think al-Qaeda itself was marching down upper Broadway – or perhaps Islamist militants would have received a warmer welcome?

 

BILL CLINTON “ENDORSES” JOHN MCCAIN

Bill Clinton “endorses” John McCain.

Highlights of Friday’s Obama-McCain presidential debate.

-- Tom Gross


Peres at UN: Ahmadinejad is a “disgrace to Islam” (& still no word on missing American in Iran)

September 26, 2008

* Livni: Ahmadinejad speech makes mockery of UN vow of “never again”
* Netanyahu: “The year is 1938 and Europe is sleeping, not for the first time”
* The Guardian: Bush “turned down Israeli request to bomb Iran”
* Israeli Military intelligence: Iran now halfway to first nuclear bomb

 

CONTENTS

AHMADINEJAD IN NEW YORK

1. Ahmadinejad again denies Holocaust, blames Jews for world financial crisis
2. Peres at UN: Ahmadinejad is a “disgrace to Islam”
3. McCain, Obama speak out; other politicians silent
4. Livni: Ahmadinejad’s speech makes mockery of UN vow of “never again”
5. Netanyahu: “The year is 1938 and Europe is sleeping, not for the first time”
6. Iran’s president takes message to gullible U.S. media
7. “Israel causing Palestinian Holocaust”
8. Jewish organizations cave in to bullying from Obama camp
9. American press wakes up to the nuclear threat

THE NUCLEAR THREAT

10. The Guardian: Bush “turned down Israeli request to bomb Iran”
11. Israeli military intelligence: Iran halfway to first nuclear bomb
12. Former IDF head: Military strike against Iran may be inevitable
13. Russia, China thwart Iran sanctions
14. Still no word on missing American in Iran
15. Iranian general killed in clashes with rebels
16. Media group criticizes jailing by Iran of ethnic minority journalists
17. “Nuclear Pyongyang is helping Iran”
18. Half of Middle East Internet users live in Iran
19. Ahmadinejad gets a warm reception (NY Sun, Sept. 25, 2008)
20. Sarah Palin on Ahmadinejad: “He must be stopped”


[All notes below by Tom Gross]

This dispatch concerns Iran and is a follow-up to Iran prepares Salman Rushdie’s coffin, as Hillary Clinton cancels appearance at NY rally against Ahmadinejad.

 

AHMADINEJAD: ZIONISTS RESPONSIBLE FOR GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad delivered an anti-Semitic tirade before world leaders gathered at the United Nations General Assembly in New York this week – and received applause from many.

“The American and European nations are being manipulated by a small but cunning group of people called Zionists who control the important centers of the economy,” he said, in a speech to which many other heads of state, diplomats and dignitaries applauded.

His also warned of “Zionist murderers” and said that not just Israel, but also America would disappear as was Allah’s will. Iran is now seeking a seat on the UN Security Council.

 

PERES AT UN: AHMADINEJAD IS A “DISGRACE TO ISLAM”

Following Ahmadinejad’s anti-Semitic tirade, Israeli President Shimon Peres (filling in for outgoing Prime Minister Ehud Olmert) said Iran presents “a danger to the entire world” and Ahmadinejad was a “disgrace to Islam.”

In a press conference, Peres also criticized the UN for allowing itself to be used as “a platform for anti-Semitism.” He said: “This is the first time in the history of the United Nations that the head of a state is appearing openly and publicly with the ugly and dark accusations of the ‘Protocols of the Elders of Zion’.”

Peres was referring to the anti-Semitic hoax concocted in tsarist Russia which later paved the way for the Holocaust.

Addressing the General Assembly, Peres, 85, refrained from criticizing the UN itself, but at the end of his address, he paused and took a simple black skullcap out of his pocket and placed it on his head, making clear that he was standing not just as a president of Israel but also as a Jew.

Israel’s UN Ambassador Gabriela Shalev said the move had been unrehearsed and had come as a surprise to her as she sat watching from Israel’s seat.

“Tehran combines long-range missiles and short-range minds. The situation is pregnant with tragedies,” Peres said in his address, which was made a day after Russia effectively torpedoed chances of the UN reaching agreement on a new round of sanctions on Iran’s nuclear program.

 

MCCAIN, OBAMA SPEAK OUT; OTHER POLITICIANS SILENT

American Jewish leaders expressed disappointment that UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon refrained from repudiating Ahmadinejad’s statements.

“The repugnant ideas and prejudiced sentiment asserted by President Ahmadinejad must not go unanswered,” the Anti-Defamation League said in a letter to Ban. “We ask you to speak out against his vile words and denounce his outrageous claims and abuse of the UN platform.”

Senior American politicians, including John McCain and Barack Obama, swiftly denounced Ahmadinejad’s tirade against Jews and denial of the Holocaust. Politicians from other countries were largely silent.

The Iranian website Asr-e Iran claimed that Obama’s condemnation of the Iranian president was being directed by a small Zionist group who control the media and only proves the truth of the Iranian president’s warnings. (In Persian here.)

 

LIVNI: AHMADINEJAD’S SPEECH MAKES MOCKERY OF UN VOW OF “NEVER AGAIN”

Israeli Foreign Minister (and Prime Minister designate) Tzipi Livni blasted the United Nations for granting Iran’s president a platform to deliver an anti-Semitic address that contradicted its vow to prevent another Holocaust.

“Ahmadinejad’s speech at the UN demonstrates the absurd state of affairs of the organization whose founding motto was ‘Never Again.’ But, that is not even the worst of it. Iran is now asking to be included as a member of the UN Security Council. This is like allowing a criminal to be his own judge and jury,” she said.

 

NETANYAHU: “THE YEAR IS 1938 AND EUROPE IS SLEEPING, UNFORTUNATELY NOT FOR THE FIRST TIME”

Israel’s Likud party opposition leader Benjamin Netanyahu said the Iranian leader’s statements heighten the urge for Western action against Tehran’s nuclear activities. “The president of Iran unites all of Israel given the threat. There is no difference between myself and [Kadima party leader] Tzipi Livni and [Labor party leader] Ehud Barak on this matter. The West still does not spot the danger and even if it does spot it, it is still not acting. Israel needs to do what is needed so that Iran does not obtain a nuclear weapon,” he said

“The year is 1938 and Iran is analogous to Germany. Europe is sleeping, it’s napping, unfortunately not for the first time but Israel must not absorb the negative consequences of that.”

 

IRAN’S PRESIDENT TAKES MESSAGE TO GULLIBLE U.S. MEDIA

Meanwhile, during his stay in New York this week, Ahmadinejad was allowed to further his aims by being invited to give interviews to the “useful idiots” of the American media, including National Public Radio’s “Morning Edition”, and CNN’s Larry King show.

He toned down his remarks for Larry King in a masterful propaganda effort to make him seem respectable.

But in various interviews to other American media, Ahmadinejad continued to express his view that Israel has no future, describing the Jewish state as “an airplane that has lost its engine.”

***

In Israel, the media took rather a different line. The headline of Israel Hayom was “Ahmadinejad At UN: The Most Anti-Semitic Speech”; and Ma’ariv’s headline was “The Ahmadinejad Horror Show.”

***

Please also read the article below from The New York Sun titled “Ahmadinejad gets a warm reception” about how 400 American students and professors flew to New York’s Hyatt hotel from all over America – in many cases their transport paid for by their colleges – to listen to and lap up Ahmadinejad’s ugly propaganda. Professors from Harvard, Columbia and MIT attended.

 

“ISRAEL CAUSING PALESTINIAN HOLOCAUST”

In a separate speech given to reporters at a press conference prior to his UN address, Ahmadinejad said Israel was “perpetrating a holocaust on the Palestinian people.”

He also again said that the Holocaust by Nazi Germany was a “fake” and “an invention.”

He added that the Jewish state wouldn’t survive “in any form.”

He also downplayed the possibility of an Israeli strike against Iran. “The Zionists are in a weak position to launch attacks against any other country,” he was quoted by Iran’s Press TV as saying.

Meanwhile, Iranian Vice President Mashayee said in Iran this week that “Israel is a dead corpse whose burial has been delayed.” (In Persian here.)

And in an open letter to Supreme Leader Khamenei immediately after the Supreme Leader’s Friday prayer sermon in Tehran, Vice President Mashayee wrote: “I am convinced about the annihilation of world Zionism and find it within our reach.”

 

JEWISH ORGANIZATIONS CAVE IN TO BULLYING FROM OBAMA CAMP

This item of mine was published early last Friday on the website of the National Review. Might this be a foretaste to the way an Obama-Biden administration might pressure Israel if elected?

Jewish organizations cave in to bullying from Obama camp
By Tom Gross
National Review Online
September 19, 2008, 04:29 AM

Yesterday I noted that Senator Hillary Clinton canceled an appearance at a major New York rally next week because Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin was also due to speak. The rally will be held outside UN headquarters on Monday to protest against Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

The UN General Assembly opens that day, and the Iranian dictator (repressor of women, children, Christians, homosexuals, Kurds and Bahá’ís, as well as being the biggest anti-Semite on the international stage since Hitler) is scheduled to address the body the following day.

But following what is described as heavy muscle pressure from the Obama-Biden camp, the Jewish groups who are organizing the rally (which is also expected to be attended by Iranian dissidents and other human rights activists) have now disinvited Palin. (Obama and Biden say they won’t accept invitations to attend either.)

So thanks to pressure from Obama and his foolish foreign policy advisors, as well from the far-left George Soros-financed group “J Street,” neither major Democrat nor Republican heavyweights will now attend the rally.

Do Obama and Biden actually want Iran to get a nuclear weapon?

***

UPDATE 1: HOLOCAUST SURVIVORS: WHERE THEN ARE OUR FAMILES?

Monday’s rally was attended by several thousand people, but obviously had Sarah Palin been allowed to attend or had Hillary Clinton or Joe Biden chosen to come, the crowd demonstrating against Ahmadinejad, would have been much bigger, and the international media attention much greater.

Many liberal American Jews are apparently more concerned about hounding Sarah Palin than stopping Iran getting a nuclear arsenal which it may well use to wipe out Israel. Prominent American Jews in the media and Hollywood were also notoriously silent during the (first?) Holocaust, with only a very few exceptions.

Among those attending Monday’s and yesterday’s rallies in New York were elderly survivors of Nazi death camps in Europe, who said they were the living rejoinders to Ahmadinejad’s lies about the Holocaust.

One Holocaust survivor in attendance, named Elaine told an Iranian opposition radio station: “Ahmadinejad said that the Holocaust never happened – that it is invented. So where are my parents? Where is my whole family? I had five sisters and two brothers... Six million Jews were killed and a million and half of them children. So he comes and he says that we invented the Holocaust.”

(Please see the last item on this dispatch for the remarks Sarah Palin would have given at the rally had she been allowed to speak.)

***

UPDATE 2: CATHOLIC LEAGUE CRITICIZES OTHER CHURCHES

The Catholic League sent a mass email to its membership, saying in part: “Catholics need to stand with their Jewish brothers and sisters in protesting... Ahmadinejad is a menace to freedom-loving people the world over, and the sight of religious groups embracing him is nauseating. The Catholic League is proud to take part in this rally and we encourage people of all religious groups to have a contingent represent them on Thursday evening.”

Among the religious groups honoring Ahmadinejad at the Grand Hyatt Hotel in New York City were the Americans Friends Service Committee, the Mennonite Central Committee, the Quaker United Nations Office, Religions for Peace, and the World Council of Churches.

***

UPDATE 3: EVANGELICALS: INDICT AHMADINEJAD

A prominent evangelical organization, angered by the decision of other Christian organizations to meet and honor Ahmadinejad in New York (see last week’s dispatch for details) has said it would deliver a petition to UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon signed by 55,000 Christians from 128 countries demanding that Ahmadinejad be indicted for incitement to genocide against Israel.

Malcolm Hedding, the organization’s executive director (and who is also a subscriber to this email list), said: “The silence of most Christian clergy in the face of Germany’s horrific bid to annihilate European Jewry left a deep stain on the churches. Yet from it has arisen a sense among multitudes of Christians today that we have an inescapable moral duty to earnestly speak out whenever another genocidal campaign threatens the Jewish people.”

 

AMERICAN PRESS WAKES UP TO THE NUCLEAR THREAT

In America, the press this week ran a series of editorials warning of the dangers of a nuclear Iran.

In a lead editorial in The Washington Post on Tuesday titled “Iran Slips Away,” the paper said “Even as its nuclear program accelerates, the impetus to stop it loses steam.”

“As Iran races toward accumulating enough uranium for a bomb, the sense of urgency about the threat it poses is lower here and in Europe than it was six months or a year ago... There seems to be little prospect that the Security Council will agree anytime soon on a fourth round of UN sanctions.”

In The Wall Street Journal, Democrats and Republicans came together to co-author a piece titled “Everyone needs to worry about Iran.”

The four authors were Richard Holbrooke (a former U.S. ambassador to the UN), R. James Woolsey (a former director of the CIA), Dennis Ross (the Middle East envoy for President Clinton) and Mark Wallace (a representative of the U.S. to the UN for management and reform). Woolsey and Ross are both subscribers to this email list.

And in an editorial in The New York Times titled “Remember Iran?” The New York Times remembered Iran but drew precisely the wrong conclusions, essentially calling for the appeasement of Iran’s regime by America.

After Hitler, the policy of appeasing dictators – famously referred to by Winston Churchill as “feeding a crocodile, hoping it will eat one last” – appeared to be permanently discredited. But apparently not by The New York Times.

 

THE GUARDIAN: BUSH “TURNED DOWN ISRAELI REQUEST TO BOMB IRAN”

According to an “exclusive” published today in London in The Guardian (and reprinted courtesy of Reuters and other news agencies elsewhere) “Israel’s then prime minister Ehud Olmert reportedly spoke to President George W. Bush about the possibility of a strike on Iran during the American leader’s visit to the Jewish state in May.”

The revelations were sourced to European diplomats.

The author of The Guardian’s article, Jonathan Steele, is a notorious polemicist against America and the West.

Mark Regev, Olmert’s spokesman, reacted to The Guardian’s story saying: “The need to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons is raised at every meeting between the prime minister and foreign leaders. Israel prefers a diplomatic solution to this issue but all options must remain on the table. Your unnamed European source attributed words to the prime minister that were not spoken in any working meeting with foreign guests.”

Tom Gross adds: During Saddam Hussein’s rule in 1981, Israeli aircraft successfully destroyed Iraq’s nuclear reactor at Osirak shortly before it was due to start operating. At the time the entire world, including President Reagan, attacked Israel, and newspapers like The New York Times were scathing in their criticism of the government of Menachem Begin. Since then, many politicians and journalists in the West and Arab world have acknowledged that Begin’s action was necessary and correct.

 

ISRAELI MILITARY INTELLIGENCE: IRAN HALFWAY TO NUCLEAR BOMB

Iran is halfway to a nuclear bomb, and Hizbullah, Hamas and Syria are using this period of relative calm to significantly rearm, Brig.-Gen. Yossi Baidatz, the Military Intelligence’s head of research, told the Israeli cabinet on Sunday during a particularly gloomy briefing on the threats facing Israel.

Baidatz warned there was a growing gap between Iran’s progress on the nuclear front and the West’s determination to stop it. “Iran is concentrating on uranium enrichment, and is making progress,” he said, noting that they have improved the function of their 4,000 uranium centrifuges.

According to Baidatz, the Iranian centrifuges have so far produced between one-third to one-half of the enriched material needed to build a nuclear bomb.

“The Iranians are pleased that the gap is widening,” Baidatz said. “Their confidence is growing with the thought that the international community is not strong enough to stop them,” he added.

Baidatz said the Iranians were playing for time, and that time was working in their favor since the longer the process dragged on, the wider the rifts appearing among the countries in the West become. “Iran is in control of the technology and is moving with determination toward a nuclear bomb,” he said.

 

FORMER IDF HEAD: MILITARY STRIKE AGAINST IRAN MAY BE INEVITABLE

General Moshe Ya’alon, the former head of the Israeli army, has said that Iran threatens the West in the same way Hitler once did and that if economic and political sanctions failed, a military conflict will be inevitable. “Today, we in the West are facing the same situation, the same lack of decisiveness towards a threat that is no less severe than that which Hitler posed in 1939,” Ya’alon said. “We can still stop Iran using political and economic measures but if we do not, then a military confrontation is inevitable.” Ya’alon served as chief of staff of the IDF from 2002 to 2005.

 

RUSSIA, CHINA THWART IRAN SANCTIONS

Russia and China (both of whom are permanent members of the UN Security Council) are blocking U.S. and European efforts to slap new sanctions on Iran over its disputed nuclear program, reports the Associated Press.

Writing in the Israeli paper Ha’aretz yesterday, Yossi Melman said:

“The UN’s sanctions on Iran have collapsed. That is the only conclusion one can draw from Russia’s announcement earlier this week that it is no longer willing to support the Security Council’s permanent members’ proposal for a new set of sanctions, the fourth of its kind, against Iran.

“Though no funeral has been held or death certificate issued, Moscow has rendered clinically dead the joint international efforts to stop Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.

“The sanctions imposed two years ago were not strong, as they were the result of a compromise between the U.S., EU, Russia and China. But they expressed a moral stand by the international community that it would not come to terms with a nuclear Iran.

“Russia, which will complete constructing a nuclear power plant in the Iranian city of Bushehr this year, was never enthused by the idea of sanctions. It did everything it could to stall and weaken them. Eventually, it always agreed on watered-down versions while exploiting U.S. weaknesses such as its involvement in Iraq, the presidential elections and its severe economic crisis. Thus, Russia is strengthening the Iranian regime and signaling to it that the basic, though superficial, international consensus against it has ceased to exist.

“... Now, thanks to support from Moscow, the Iranian president and his patron, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, can feel more relaxed and claim that the international sanctions will soon be lifted, deflecting criticism against them... Iran is only months away from crossing the technological threshold of building an atomic bomb.”

***

Here are some photos of this week’s military parade in Iran:
www.tabnak.ir/pages/?cid=18934
www.jahannews.com/fa/pages/?cid=33395

“Iran’s latest domestically-manufactured military arms, naval weapons and air force equipment, including the Shahab-3 missile with the ability to hit targets within a range of 2,000 km, as well as the 300 km range Shahab-1, the 500 km range Shahab-2, and the upgraded 2,000 km range Gadr-1 ballistic missiles were also displayed,” Iran’s Press TV said.

Meanwhile, Russia is negotiating the delivery of more air defense systems to Iran, said the General Director of Russian arms exporter, Rosoboronexport.

 

STILL NO WORD ON MISSING AMERICAN IN IRAN

Christine Levinson, the wife of former FBI agent Robert Levinson who disappeared in Iran l8 months ago, says Iranian officials are refusing to give her any information about her husband. “I know nothing about his welfare, or his whereabouts. He is 60 years old and has diabetes and high blood pressure, so that makes me extremely concerned.”

The Iranian delegation visiting New York for the UN General Assembly refused to meet with Mrs. Levinson.

* More in Persian here
* Background in English here.

 

IRANIAN GENERAL KILLED IN CLASHES WITH REBELS

Iran’s government-controlled Fars News Agency reports that four members of the Iranian security forces, including a general, have been killed in clashes with rebels in Sistan-Baluchestan province, in southeastern Iran.

“The general was killed during mopping up operations in the Nosratabad area northwest of the provincial capital Zahedan... Several rebels were also killed,” reports Fars.

Sistan-Baluchestan has seen a surge in attacks by the Jundullah (Soldiers of God) group in recent years. Over three thousand Iranian police and security forces have been killed in clashes with militia in southeastern Iran since the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

 

MEDIA GROUP CRITICIZES JAILING BY IRAN OF ETHNIC MINORITY JOURNALISTS

This website has long urged international human rights organizations to speak up for persecuted Iranians.

On September 24, 2008, the media watchdog Reporters Without Borders finally called on Iran to stop what it called Tehran’s “all-out repression” of ethnic-minority journalists.

The Paris-based group criticized the holding without charge of four ethnic-Azeri journalists – Alireza Sarafi, Said Mohamadi, Hassain Rashedi, and Akabar Azad – and the sentencing of another, Shahnaz Gholami, on September 20 to six months in prison for her online articles.

Reporters Without Borders said it was “disturbing” that 11 out of 12 journalists detained in Iran last week were from the Kurdish, Azeri, or Arab minorities.

It said the journalists were being held in prison for criticizing social inequality and demanding equal treatment for non-Persian minorities.

 

“NUCLEAR PYONGYANG IS HELPING IRAN”

The leading French daily, Le Figaro, reported on September 23, 2008 that “North Korean experts are involved in developing nuclear missiles for the Iranian regime on a site that was previously not identified, according to the exiled opposition group, the National Council of Resistance Iran (NCRI).”

According to NCRI, these experts have been working “for at least two years” on a secret military site in the Hemmat Khojar region, south-east of Tehran, where they are involved in the adaptation of ballistic missile medium-range Shahab-3 with nuclear warheads.

The NCRI said their information is based on sources “within the regime.”

 

HALF OF MIDDLE-EAST INTERNET USERS LIVE IN IRAN

Iran has the second highest percentage of its population online in the Middle East. Over 23 million Iranians use the Internet, representing 34.9 % of the population. Only Israel has a higher proportion of users; just over half the Israeli population has Internet access.

According to the Internet World Stats, Iranians comprise nearly 54% of total Internet users in the Middle East. There are thousands of anti-government blogs illegally operating in Iran

Selected statistics from “Internet World Stats”.

Iran: 23,000,000 users as of March 08, 34.9% penetration.
Israel: 3,700,000 users as of July 06, 52.0% penetration.
Palestine (West Bank and Gaza): 355,500 users as of March 08, 13.6 % penetration.
Syria: 2,132,000 users as of March 08, 10.8% penetration.


FULL ARTICLES & ITEMS

AHMADINEJAD GETS A WARM RECEPTION

Ahmadinejad gets a warm reception
New York Sun
September 25, 2008

Booed by Columbia University students a year ago, President Ahmadinejad of Iran early yesterday received a much warmer reception from 400 American students and professors at the Hyatt hotel in Midtown Manhattan. “Especially at a time when our leaders and policymakers aren’t meeting with this man, it was refreshing to hear from him,” a senior at North Central College of Naperville, James Nebl, said. Mr. Nebl flew from Chicago with seven other students from the college to hear the Iranian leader. The college paid for the trip.

Other students who got face time with the Holocaust-denying president came from the State University of New York at Old Westbury and Chestnut Hill Academy, a boys’ school in Philadelphia.

The president of SUNY Old Westbury is the Reverend Calvin O. Butts III, who is also the pastor of the Abyssinian Baptist Church, one of Harlem’s largest churches. “It was incredible,” a North Central College senior, Ann Fisher, said. “I honestly believe that the National Intelligence Estimate is correct and that since 2003, the nuclear program has been peaceful.”

“I LOVE YOU ALL”

“I love you all,” Mr. Ahmadinejad told the roomful of students, the Boston Globe reported. “I feel I am with very old friends.”

Last September, when he spoke at Columbia, thousands of students and New Yorkers protested his invitation. The school’s president, Lee Bollinger, drew criticism for inviting the Iranian leader and then harshly introducing him at a speech to faculty and students, belittling the leader by calling him a “petty, cruel dictator.”

Several students asked the Iranian president about his most controversial positions: that Israel ought to be destroyed and that the Holocaust may not have occurred. About the murder of 6 million Jews, Mr. Ahmadinejad said he was unable to “negate it or prove it,” the Associated Press reported. Ms. Fisher said that Mr. Ahmadinejad skirted questions about which candidate he supports in the American presidential election.

THIS IS HOW COLLEGES USE THEIR FUNDS

North Central College, a liberal arts college, paid for all eight students to travel to meet the Iranian president. A political science professor who helped arrange the trip, Steven Caliendo, said that North Central students represented Iran at a Model United Nations Conference last year in New York, where they met the Iranian ambassador. The ambassador was impressed with the students and contacted the college’s Model UN coach to invite them to meet Mr. Ahmadinejad, he said. “They were beside themselves,” Mr. Caliendo said about his students, adding that they “were not supportive of Ahmadinejad’s regime in any way, shape, or form.”

Mr. Caliendo called the meeting an “amazing educational opportunity,” and said that he would have felt the same way if the meeting were with Saddam Hussein or Adolf Hitler.

Following his speech at the General Assembly Tuesday, Mr. Ahmadinejad hosted a dinner with 40 Americans, including professors and representatives of several nonprofit groups.

PROFESSORS FROM HARVARD, COLUMBIA AND MIT

Harvard professors Graham Allison and Hassan Abbas, Columbia professor Gary Sick, and MIT professor James Walsh were among those attending the dinner, which was also held at the Hyatt.

The guests sat around a table for three hours and discussed American-Iranian relations, Iran’s nuclear program, Iran’s human rights record, and the Holocaust. According to Mr. Walsh, who has attended three such dinners with the Iranian president, Mr. Ahmadinejad came off as “more of a statesman” than in previous visits. He was “more practiced, more self-assured,” and made jokes. “Ahmadinejad is a bit of a debater, so he prefers people to offer their opinions,” Mr. Walsh said.

No alcohol was served.

 

PALIN ON AHMADINEJAD: “HE MUST BE STOPPED”

In the interest of overcoming censorship I attach the remarks that Sarah Palin would have given at the New York rally against Ahmadinejad had she been allowed to speak.

Her assistant in preparing these remarks is a subscriber to this email list.

***

SPEECH BY SARAH PALIN

I am honored to be with you and with leaders from across this great country – leaders from different faiths and political parties united in a single voice of outrage.

Tomorrow, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will come to New York – to the heart of what he calls the Great Satan – and speak freely in this, a country whose demise he has called for.

Ahmadinejad may choose his words carefully, but underneath all of the rhetoric is an agenda that threatens all who seek a safer and freer world. We gather here today to highlight the Iranian dictator’s intentions and to call for action to thwart him.

He must be stopped.

The world must awake to the threat this man poses to all of us. Ahmadinejad denies that the Holocaust ever took place. He dreams of being an agent in a “Final Solution” – the elimination of the Jewish people. He has called Israel a “stinking corpse” that is “on its way to annihilation.”

Such talk cannot be dismissed as the ravings of a madman – not when Iran just this summer tested long-range Shahab-3 missiles capable of striking Tel Aviv, not when the Iranian nuclear program is nearing completion, and not when Iran sponsors terrorists that threaten and kill innocent people around the world.

The Iranian government wants nuclear weapons. The International Atomic Energy Agency reports that Iran is running at least 3,800 centrifuges and that its uranium enrichment capacity is rapidly improving. According to news reports, U.S. intelligence agencies believe the Iranians may have enough nuclear material to produce a bomb within a year.

The world has condemned these activities. The United Nations Security Council has demanded that Iran suspend its illegal nuclear enrichment activities. It has levied three rounds of sanctions. How has Ahmadinejad responded? With the declaration that the “Iranian nation would not retreat one iota” from its nuclear program.

So, what should we do about this growing threat? First, we must succeed in Iraq. If we fail there, it will jeopardize the democracy the Iraqis have worked so hard to build, and empower the extremists in neighboring Iran. Iran has armed and trained terrorists who have killed our soldiers in Iraq, and it is Iran that would benefit from an American defeat in Iraq.

“JEWS AND WOMEN AMONG IRAN’S VICTIMS”

If we retreat without leaving a stable Iraq, Iran’s nuclear ambitions will be bolstered. If Iran acquires nuclear weapons – they could share them tomorrow with the terrorists they finance, arm, and train today. Iranian nuclear weapons would set off a dangerous regional nuclear arms race that would make all of us less safe.

But Iran is not only a regional threat; it threatens the entire world. It is the no. 1 state sponsor of terrorism.

It sponsors the world’s most vicious terrorist groups, Hamas and Hizbullah. Together, Iran and its terrorists are responsible for the deaths of Americans in Lebanon in the 1980s, in Saudi Arabia in the 1990s, and in Iraq today. They have murdered Iraqis, Lebanese, Palestinians, and other Muslims who have resisted Iran’s desire to dominate the region. They have persecuted countless people simply because they are Jewish.

Iran is responsible for attacks not only on Israelis, but on Jews living as far away as Argentina. Anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial are part of Iran’s official ideology and murder is part of its official policy. Not even Iranian citizens are safe from their government’s threat to those who want to live, work, and worship in peace. Politically-motivated abductions, torture, death by stoning, flogging, and amputations are just some of its state-sanctioned punishments.

It is said that the measure of a country is the treatment of its most vulnerable citizens. By that standard, the Iranian government is both oppressive and barbaric. Under Ahmadinejad’s rule, Iranian women are some of the most vulnerable citizens.

If an Iranian woman shows too much hair in public, she risks being beaten or killed.

If she walks down a public street in clothing that violates the state dress code, she could be arrested.

But in the face of this harsh regime, the Iranian women have shown courage. Despite threats to their lives and their families, Iranian women have sought better treatment through the “One Million Signatures Campaign Demanding Changes to Discriminatory Laws.” The authorities have reacted with predictable barbarism. Last year, women’s rights activist Delaram Ali was sentenced to 20 lashes and 10 months in prison for committing the crime of “propaganda against the system.” After international protests, the judiciary reduced her sentence to “only” 10 lashes and 36 months in prison and then temporarily suspended her sentence. She still faces the threat of imprisonment.

“THIS IS AN ISSUE THAT SHOULD UNITE ALL AMERICANS”

Earlier this year, Senator Clinton said that “Iran is seeking nuclear weapons, and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps is in the forefront of that” effort. Senator Clinton argued that part of our response must include stronger sanctions, including the designation of the IRGC as a terrorist organization. John McCain and I could not agree more.

Senator Clinton understands the nature of this threat and what we must do to confront it. This is an issue that should unite all Americans. Iran should not be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons. Period. And in a single voice, we must be loud enough for the whole world to hear: Stop Iran!

Only by working together, across national, religious, and political differences, can we alter this regime’s dangerous behavior. Iran has many vulnerabilities, including a regime weakened by sanctions and a population eager to embrace opportunities with the West. We must increase economic pressure to change Iran’s behavior.

Tomorrow, Ahmadinejad will come to New York. On our soil, he will exercise the right of freedom of speech – a right he denies his own people. He will share his hateful agenda with the world. Our task is to focus the world on what can be done to stop him.

We must rally the world to press for truly tough sanctions at the UN or with our allies if Iran’s allies continue to block action in the UN We must start with restrictions on Iran’s refined petroleum imports.

We must reduce our dependency on foreign oil to weaken Iran’s economic influence.

We must target the regime’s assets abroad; bank accounts, investments, and trading partners.

President Ahmadinejad should be held accountable for inciting genocide, a crime under international law.

We must sanction Iran’s Central Bank and the Revolutionary Guard Corps – which no one should doubt is a terrorist organization.

Together, we can stop Iran’s nuclear program.

Senator McCain has made a solemn commitment that I strongly endorse: Never again will we risk another Holocaust. And this is not a wish, a request, or a plea to Israel’s enemies. This is a promise that the United States and Israel will honor, against any enemy who cares to test us. It is John McCain’s promise and it is my promise.

Thank you.


Netanyahu: “Joining a coalition under Livni is like joining Lehman brothers”

September 18, 2008

* Livni’s Mossad background exaggerated in international media
* Outgoing Israeli PM Olmert “offers Palestinians 98.1 % of the West Bank”
* Palestinian woman exploits humanitarian checkpoint lane to throw acid at soldier

(Please note there is another dispatch that was posted today too: Iran prepares Salman Rushdie’s coffin, as Hillary Clinton cancels appearance at NY rally against Ahmadinejad.)

 

CONTENTS

1. Tzipi Livni today starts to try to form a new Israeli government
2. Livni’s Mossad background exaggerated in foreign media
3. Netanyahu: “Joining a coalition under Livni is like joining Lehman brothers”
4. Palestinians pleased with Livni’s win
5. Livni favors a quick peace deal with the Palestinians
6. Carnage in Gaza
7. Palestinian woman throws acid on soldier’s face at checkpoint
8. Iraqi MP hounded after visiting Israel
9. Al-Qaeda’s American-born propaganda chief may have died in predator attack
10. And on a lighter note...


[All notes below by Tom Gross]

TZIPI LIVNI TODAY STARTS TO TRY TO FORM A NEW ISRAELI GOVERNMENT

Israel’s foreign minister, Tzipi Livni, has narrowly won the vote to replace Ehud Olmert as head of Israel’s governing Kadima party. Provided she is able to stitch together a coalition within the next few weeks, she will become Israel’s second female prime minister. Golda Meir, Israel’s first female prime minister, held office from 1969-74.

When voting ended at 10.30 pm local time last night, the pollsters predicted a big win, by 10- to 12-point margins, for Livni. However, by the time all the ballot papers were counted this morning she had won by a mere 431 votes – or just one percent of the ballots cast. 74,000 Kadima members were eligible to vote.

Olmert is only expected to formally stand down once Livni confirms she has formed a working coalition. Olmert’s standing as prime minister never recovered from Israel’s failure to beat Hizbullah, after the Iranian-backed militia attacked Israel in July 2006.

“LIKE CHOOSING BETWEEN TWO SHADES OF GRAY”

Olmert was then embroiled in a series of minor corruption scandals which forced the early Kadima leadership race. Livni’s attempt to broker a coalition agreement will not be helped by the imminent Jewish holiday season during which political activity is normally suspended.

If she fails to create a coalition within 42 days, a general election will be called, according to Israel’s election law.

The election failed to interest the wider Israeli public. Yediot Ahronot, Israel’s best-selling newspaper, said the choice between Livni and her opponent Shaul Mofaz was “like choosing between two shades of gray.”

There were two other candidates, longtime cabinet minister Meir Sheetrit and Avi Dichter, a former director of Israel’s Shin Bet security service. Neither garnered many votes.

 

LIVNI’S MOSSAD BACKGROUND EXAGGERATED IN FOREIGN MEDIA

Some foreign press have been quick to play up Livni’s past Mossad connections.

For example, a large heading on Monday in The Independent newspaper in London read “Israel: The spy who would be PM.”

And the Times of London started its report yesterday by describing Livni as the “Mossad agent-turned-politician Tzipi Livni.”

In fact Livni, a 50-year-old mother of two, has spent most of her career as a commercial lawyer, and more lately as a politician, serving in various posts, including foreign minister.

Livni’s role in the Mossad was limited to a period when she was in her early 20s and she occupied a safehouse in Paris to give it the semblance of a normal apartment. Foreign news reports suggesting she was on “the frontline of the hunt to bring Arab terrorists operating across Europe to justice” are incorrect.

For example, a recent article in the (London) Sunday Times stated: “From her base in Paris Livni traveled throughout Europe in pursuit of Arab terrorists... She blended in well in European capitals, working with male agents, most of them ex-commandos, taking out Arab terrorists.” This is incorrect.

WHY MENTION SABRA AND SHATILA?

It is also typical of the Times of London’s slanted reporting against Israel that in its news report last night about Livni beating Mofaz to replace Olmert, it couldn’t resist writing about the 1982 Sabra and Shatila massacre in Lebanon – which was in fact carried out by Christian Arabs not by Israel, and is only one of dozens of similar massacres by Muslim and Christian Arabs against one another throughout Lebanon’s long civil war, and in any case has nothing to do with yesterday’s candidates or vote. (The sections on the Sabra and Shatila massacre have been edited out of the updated Times news report on the election today, after reader complaints.)

Livni also used to work as a waitress in cafes in the Sinai desert, when the area was controlled by Israel.

 

NETANYAHU: “JOINING A COALITION UNDER LIVNI IS LIKE JOINING LEHMAN BROTHERS”

Many Israelis are angry that Kadima wants to choose a Prime Minister for the rest of Israel without asking the wider electorate. Even among Kadima’s 74,000 party members, there was a very low turnout, at about 50 percent.

Ma’ariv, Israel’s second highest circulation newspaper, says in an editorial: “Don’t let them form a government. Kadima’s random voters are allowed to choose themselves a leader, but not a Prime Minister for us all. For that there are elections.”

Another Israeli newspaper, Yisrael Hayom, writes in an editorial “The state of Israel is being held prisoner by a faction [Kadima] which is destroying our political and security resources, and is engaged in a useless race for political achievements considered as such only by those who shape public opinion.”

The Jerusalem Post asks if Kadima can offer a genuine “third way” alternative to Likud and Labor. The editorial questions whether Kadima is indeed a third way, or simply another dead end.

MORE PEOPLE AT PAUL MCCARTNEY CONCERT

Yediot Ahronot says today that, “More people will go to the forthcoming Paul McCartney concert than those who bothered to go to the polls yesterday to choose the person who will likely be the next prime minister.” The editors add: “Let us not be mistaken – the victory still does not assure Livni the premiership. An uneasy period awaits her.”

If general elections were held today, the Likud party, led by former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, would likely win. Netanyahu called on other smaller parties not to join Livni in a new coalition, which he predicted would in any case soon collapse. “Joining a Kadima coalition is like joining Lehman brothers,” Netanyahu said.

 

LIVNI FAVORS A QUICK PEACE DEAL WITH THE PALESTINIANS

Left-wing activists in Israel welcomed Livni’s election as “a boost for the current Israeli-Palestinian peace process as she is one of Israel’s strongest supporters of attempts to reach a quick negotiated agreement with moderate Palestinians.”

Her opponent, Iranian-born Mofaz, a former chief of staff, campaigned on security issues and would likely have taken a much stronger line than Livni against Iran, Hamas and Hizbullah. Many Israelis regard the center-left Livni as naïve on these issues.

Israel’s Channel 2 reported on Sunday evening that outgoing Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has discussed with the Palestinians transferring 98.1 percent of the West Bank to them. This would mean giving up territory vital to Israel’s ability to defend itself.

 

PALESTINIANS PLEASED WITH LIVNI’S WIN

Palestinian Authority officials said this morning that they were pleased with Livni’s victory and were looking forward to continuing peace talks with her.

PA officials anxiously followed the Kadima primaries throughout the day yesterday, and like Livni’s associates, were concerned about the low turnout rate. Palestinian sources were concerned that a Mofaz victory would halt the diplomatic process, while a Livni victory was perceived as recipe for continued talks.

A senior PA official told Yediot Ahronot: “We’ll work with anyone, but it’s no secret that working with Livni will be much easier. She knows her stuff so there’s no need to start from scratch with her. We hope very much that she’d be able to put together a coalition so that we can continue to negotiate.”

 

CARNAGE IN GAZA

Since Monday night at least 12 Palestinians, including at least one young child, have been killed and dozens wounded in fighting in Gaza between Hamas and the Palestinian Dughmush clan. Hamas launched its assault on them shortly after midnight, hours after a member of the Dughmush clan killed a policeman while resisting arrest.

There has been very little reporting about these deaths in the international media and none of the dozens of “human rights” groups which constantly raise money for themselves on the basis of scare stories about Israeli “crimes” in Gaza have apparently had anything to say in the matter.

No doubt these deaths will be added to the death toll of “Palestinians killed by Israel” given periodically by prominent international media, as has happened in the past when Palestinians killed Palestinians.

According to Palestinian media reports, Hamas gunmen “knee-capped” about 30 female members of the Dughmush clan, by shooting them in the knees. This may make it harder for them to have children in future.

A Fatah spokesman condemned Hamas for carrying out an “enormous massacre.” Another Fatah leader, Ziad Abu Ein, accused Hamas of “war crimes” and urged Arab states and western aid groups to stop supporting Hamas.

Eleven people died in early August in another clash between Hamas forces and a separate clan aligned with its Fatah rivals.

 

NEWS BRIEFS

PALESTINIAN WOMAN THROWS ACID ON SOLDIER’S FACE AT CHECKPOINT

An Israel soldier stationed at the Hawara checkpoint, south of the West Bank city of Nablus, sustained facial injuries last week after a Palestinian woman poured acid in his face.

The woman was attempting to cross into Israel using a new “humanitarian aid lane,” meant for emergencies and sick people, at which minimal security checks are made. These lanes were increased after Condoleezza Rice insisted Israel do so against the better judgment of Israeli security experts.

In other incidents at checkpoints over the past few weeks, a 16-year-old boy was arrested after he was found carrying two bombs and a knife, and an 18-year old Palestinian was arrested after he was caught carrying six pipe bombs, a rifle magazine and gun powder.

***

ISRAELI SOLDIER STABBED BY PALESTINIAN IN THE JORDAN VALLEY

A Palestinian man stabbed and moderately wounded an Israeli soldier at the Almog junction, in the southern Jordan Valley. The Palestinian man snatched the soldier’s weapon and fled the scene.

***

TWO ISRAEL AIR FORCE PILOTS KILLED IN HELICOPTER CRASH

Two leading Israel Air Force pilots were killed after a “Cobra” type combat helicopter crashed while on a training mission a few days ago near the Israeli kibbutz of Ginegar in northern Israel. Between them they leave eight young children, including 18-month-old twins, without a father.

***

MORE ROCKET ATTACKS FROM GAZA

Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak ordered the IDF to temporarily close crossings to the Gaza Strip after a Kassam rocket fired from Gaza landed on the outskirts of a Sderot neighborhood on Sunday afternoon, close to Israeli homes. Hamas are meant to be observing a truce with Israel.

Since the period of what has come to be known as the “calm,” there have been 36 mortar and rocket attacks from Gaza. This is in comparison to some 300 incidents registered in the month before the ceasefire.

 

IRAQI MP HOUNDED AFTER VISITING ISRAEL

The Arabic-language daily Al-Hayat reports that Iraq is “in uproar,” following the news that a Member of Parliament has visited Israel for the second time.

Anti-Baath Iraqi MP Mithal al-Alousi, head of the Democratic party, visited Israel last week. While there he called for the establishment of a joint intelligence network with Israel and the U.S.

I met Alousi last week, and on his previous visit to Israel in September 2004. When word of that visit got out, his two sons were murdered by Baath Party sympathizers in 2005, as reported on this website at the time. Former Iraqi Culture Minister Asaad al-Hashemi was found guilty in absentia last month and sentenced to hang for involvement in the killings.

A Shi’ite MP called the current visit “an act of treachery against the Iraqi nation.” Another MP said that Alousi’s visit to Israel had “crossed all red lines” and was a “provocation of Iraqi and Arab sensibilities.”

Given the fact that Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and other prominent Palestinian politicians visit Israel all the time, it is difficult to understand the ferocity of their reaction.

Agence France-Presse reported that Iraq’s parliament on Sunday lifted Alousi’s immunity and banned him from traveling outside Iraq or attending sessions of the assembly. The decision against Alousi, the only member of his own independent political party in the parliament, was taken by acclamation.

Alousi is one of several Iraqis that subscribe to this email list.

Among previous dispatches on this subject, please see:
* Mithal al-Alousi: Paying a heavy price for recognizing Israel’s existence (Feb.10, 2005)
* Iraqi official wishes “shana tova” to the Israeli people (Sept. 15, 2004)

***

The following editorial is from The New York Sun:

Al-Alusi and Israel
September 16, 2008

The events in Baghdad involving the trip to Israel by a member of Iraq’s parliament, Mithal al-Alusi, are shaping up as quite a test. On Sunday, members of Iraq’s parliament moved to strip Mr. Alusi’s parliamentary immunity from prosecution in order to charge him with treason for visiting the Jewish state.

Mr. Alusi has attended this same counter-terrorism conference for the past four years. The law under which he is to be prosecuted is a 1969 statute dating back to the initial Baathist purges of Israeli agents. The moment is a clarifying one. Will Iraq become a model of freedom for the Middle East, or will its politics devolve into the same cycle of corruption and violence that plagues its neighbors?

When we reached Mr. Alusi in Baghdad he was in good spirits. He told us he sought to explore an alliance of nations – America, Israel, Kuwait, Iraq – that are victims of Iranian aggression. “The real problem was because I was saying Iran is a problem and we need to free ourselves from the Iranian danger. I was calling for an alliance of Iran’s victims,” he said. Mr. Alusi says that for too many years the regimes in the Middle East have used the Jewish state as an excuse for their own misrule. “I have visited Israel before. I have been open about this. I won elections, my party is more popular now because of this than before,” he said.

Mr. Alusi spent the day Monday campaigning on the issue and says he has received overwhelming support. We would not count him out. He made his name in the Iraqi opposition by briefly taking over Iraq’s embassy in Berlin in 2002 and spent time in a German prison for his beliefs. He lost two sons at the hands of terrorists inside Iraq’s government and has survived multiple assassination plots. What a turnabout and a victory it would be if a visit to Israel actually made an Iraqi politician more popular.

 

AL-QAEDA’S AMERICAN-BORN PROPAGANDA CHIEF MAY HAVE DIED IN PREDATOR ATTACK

Attacks by unmanned U.S. predator aircraft have caused carnage among the middle ranks of al-Qaeda terrorist leaders in Pakistan along the border with Afghanistan.

Adam Gadahn, originally from California – also known as Azzam al-Ameriki – has been credited with helping transform al-Qaeda’s al-Sahab propaganda wing into a slick operation which communicates in fluent English.

He was al-Qaeda’s best-known Westerner and became the poster boy of would-be jihadis around the world who are radicalized on the Internet.

Last week leading intelligence experts said that he may be dead. I first reported this on this website in March, but other mainstream newspapers have reported on this only in the past week

Gadahn, whose birth name is Adam Pearlman, is of Jewish origin, but converted to Islam before moving to Afghanistan. After he joined al-Qaeda, his family disowned him.

Gadahn is one of a small but active number of extreme self-loathing Jews or people of Jewish origin who have dedicated themselves to demonizing Jews and trying to destroy the state of Israel.

 

AND ON A LIGHTER NOTE...

Because this website so often contains very serious, depressing stories, I occasionally send items of light relief.

* Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton open Saturday Night Live together. (One should bear in mind that NBC slants left and is therefore unfair on Hillary Clinton, and even more so on Sarah Palin, but generally avoids even the hint of ridiculing Barack Obama.)

* Sarah Palin’s first political ad.

* Obama satire of the movie “Downfall” (certainly not to everyone’s taste, and in response to the videos comparing John McCain and Hillary Clinton to Hitler which Obama supporters posted earlier in the campaign).

* And, away from politics, it is a pleasure to rewatch The Zimmers, the world’s oldest pop group (other than the Rolling Stones). The grandfather of a subscriber to this email list is a leading member of the band. The lead singer is 90-years-old, the lead guitarist is 83, and the backing chorus include pensioners aged 99 and 100. The Zimmers’ “My Generation” was recorded at the legendary Abbey Road studios in London, where the Beatles recorded many of their hits. I first sent it on this list last June shortly after it was released. I note it has now been watched almost 5 million times on YouTube.


Iran prepares Salman Rushdie’s coffin, as Hillary Clinton cancels appearance at NY rally against Ahmadinejad

* CIA director confirms Syria was trying to build a nuclear bomb
* IAEA says uranium for six nuclear bombs goes missing in Iran
* Anger as Quaker organization invites Ahmadinejad to dinner at Manhattan’s Hyatt Hotel
* Ahmadinejad: Feast for elimination of Israel will soon be held

(Please note there is another dispatch that was posted today too: Netanyahu: “Joining a coalition under Livni is like joining Lehman brothers.”)

 

CONTENTS

1. Iran prepares Salman Rushdie’s coffin
2. Italian PM warns: Ahmadinejad means what he says
3. Hillary Clinton cancels appearance at NY rally against Ahmadinejad
4. Quaker organization to host Ahmadinejad at Grand Hyatt Hotel
5. Iranian Christians charged with apostasy
6. Women’s rights activists sentenced to jail
7. Only military action can stop Iran, say experts
8. IAEA says uranium for six nuclear bombs goes missing in Iran
9. Bush agrees to sell bunker-busting bombs to Israel
10. BBC: Iran sending weapons to Taliban
11. Chief Hamas aide “assassinated in Syria”
12. CIA director confirms Syria was trying to build nuclear weapons


[All notes below by Tom Gross]

IRAN PREPARES SALMAN RUSHDIE’S COFFIN

Photo of the Day. From the Iranian government-controlled Fars news agency:

Salman Rushdie’s coffin being prepared at the “International Exhibition of the Koran,” at the Imam Khomeini Grand Mosque in central Tehran this week. (There is also a coffin for the state of Israel in the background.)

The International Exhibition of the Koran also features an exhibit glorifying Palestinian suicide bombers. Visitors have been paying their respects besides large portraits of these murderers while reading prayers for the destruction of Israel.

 

ITALIAN PM WARNS: AHMADINEJAD MEANS WHAT HE SAYS

Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi accused Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Tuesday of “lunacy” and warned fellow Europeans against not taking Ahmadinejad’s words seriously.

“I think we must pay the utmost attention to the lunacy of someone who says, perhaps for internal reasons, that Israel must be wiped off the map,” Berlusconi said in a speech in Paris.

 

HILLARY CLINTON CANCELS APPEARANCE AT NY RALLY AGAINST AHMADINEJAD

Senator Hillary Clinton has canceled an appearance at a major New York rally next week because Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin will also attend. The rally will be held outside UN headquarters on September 22 to protest against Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The U.N. General Assembly opens that day, and Ahmadinejad is scheduled to address the body the following day.

Jewish groups say they are disappointed that Clinton appears to care more about petty partisan bickering than protesting the abysmal human rights record of the Iranian regime, which also sponsors terrorism in several countries and is openly flouting the international community as it rushes to build nuclear weapons.

“DOESN’T WANT TO APPEAR WITH PALIN”

The rally is sponsored jointly by the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, the National Coalition to Stop Iran Now, the United Jewish Communities, and the Jewish Community Relations Council of New York. Clinton is a senator for New York.

Some political commentators say the move by Clinton is foolish and may drive more of her supporters, concerned about the danger to the world of nuclear arms falling into the hands of jihadist extremists, to vote for a McCain-Palin ticket in November.

Iranian dissidents, Jewish leaders, and other human rights activists say they will join Sarah Palin as speakers at the 11.45 a.m. rally. Iran is one of the most brutal regimes in the world, repressing the rights of women, children and homosexuals, among others. In a speech at Columbia University in New York last year, Ahmadinejad said homosexuals no longer existed in Iran.

 

QUAKER ORGANIZATION TO HOST AHMADINEJAD AT GRAND HYATT HOTEL

There is anger by opponents of the Iranian regime that the American Friends Service Committee, a Quaker organization, is holding a dinner in honor of Ahmadinejad at the Grand Hyatt Hotel in Manhattan in central New York on Sept. 25.

The dinner is to be co-sponsored by other American-based religious organizations, including the Mennonite Central Committee and the World Council of Churches.

Representatives from a broad range of Christian ecumenical organizations, including the Episcopal Church, say they plan to attend the dinner.

The New York-based Anti-Defamation League pleaded with the groups not to honor Ahmadinejad, calling the planned event “a perversion of the search for peace and an appalling betrayal of religious values.”

A FEAST TO ELIMINATE ISRAEL?

“It simply defies belief that these organizations with a mission of promoting peace through dialogue would choose Mahmoud Ahmadinejad from among the hundreds of world leaders and ambassadors who will be in New York next week for the U.N. General Assembly, as an appropriate and legitimate interlocutor on world peace,” the ADL said.

In addition to persecuting many religious minorities, such as the Bahá’ís, Ahmadinejad frequently denies the Holocaust and calls for Israel and its people to be destroyed.

Last month, according to a report (in Persian) from the government Fars News Agency, Ahmadinejad said “Soon the feast for elimination of Zionism [Israel] and destruction of the arrogant ones [Jews and Americans] will be held.”

 

IRANIAN CHRISTIANS CHARGED WITH APOSTASY

Two Iranian Christians, Mahmoud Matin-Azad and Arash Basirat, who were arrested in May in Shiraz, have now been formally charged with apostasy. Sources say they were charged on September 5. A prominent Iranian Christian told Radio Farda that the pair may face the death penalty.

 

WOMEN’S RIGHTS ACTIVISTS SENTENCED TO JAIL

Nobel Peace Laureate Shirin Ebadi told the pro-democracy Radio Farda that four women who are members of the One Million Signature Campaign – Parvin Ardalan, Maryam Hosseinkhah, Jelveh Javaheri and Nahid Keshavarz – have been sentenced to six months in jail for writing on women’s issues on the Internet.

 

ONLY MILITARY ACTION CAN STOP IRAN, SAY EXPERTS

Diplomatic efforts to stop an Iranian nuclear crisis may have run their course, a panel of leading experts on proliferation said in Brussels on Monday.

Among those in attendance at the special symposium were experts such as Ian Anthony from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, former Mossad official Uzi Arad, and Alfred Pijpers from the Netherlands Institute of International Relations.

On nuclear terrorism, the unanimous view was that in order to prevent disaster a “more energetic leadership” is needed.

It seems that sanctions have next to no chance of working before Iran acquires a nuclear bomb. Some 10,000 companies in Europe are believed to be collaborating with Iran on the development of its gas and oil industry, an industry with an approximate turnover of $100 billion.

Prospects for a fourth round of U.N. sanctions against Iran are extremely slim, given that Russia and China, both veto-wielding members of the Security Council, oppose them.

 

IAEA SAYS URANIUM FOR SIX BOMBS IS MISSING

Separately, the (London) Daily Telegraph reports that the nuclear experts at the IAEA responsible for monitoring Iran’s nuclear program have discovered that enough enriched uranium, which if processed to weapons grade level could be used to make up to six atom bombs, has disappeared from the main production facility at Isfahan. The Daily Telegraph adds that American spy satellites have identified a number of suspicious sites, which the Iranians have not declared to nuclear inspectors, that intelligence officials believe are being used for covert research.

The Isfahan complex, which enriches raw uranium “yellow cake” into material that can be used for atomic weapons, is supposed to be subject to close supervision by the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

But the Iranians only allow IAEA inspectors access to the final stage of the production process, where the uranium in gas form – UF6 – is stored. By conducting a careful study of the amount of material stored at Isfahan, and the amount of “yellow cake” known to have been processed at the plant, nuclear experts believe between 50-60 tons of uranium – sufficient to produce five or six atom bombs – has gone missing from the plant. “If Iran’s nuclear intentions are peaceful, then why are they doing this?” an IAEA nuclear official told the Telegraph.

 

BUSH AGREES TO SELL BUNKER-BUSTING BOMBS TO ISRAEL

After delaying the request for some time, American President George W. Bush has come down in favor of selling Israel sophisticated weapons for use against heavily fortified targets, including bunker-busting bombs. Contrary to previous reports suggesting that the Bush Administration would not sell Israel the equipment, that could be integral to any future Israeli military strikes upon Iran’s nuclear weapons facilities, the U.S. Department of Defense announced it would sell the Israel Air Force (IAF) 1,000 new smart bombs, rumored to significantly enhance the IAF’s military capabilities.

The Pentagon said the U.S. will provide Israel with 1,000 units of Guided Bomb Unit-39 (GBU-39) – a special weapon developed for penetrating fortified facilities located deep underground.

The $77 million shipment, which includes launchers and appurtenances, will allow the IAF to hit many more bunkers than currently possible.

The GPS-guided weapon is said to have a 50-percent probability of hitting its intended target within 5-8 meters, which should greatly reduce the risk of collateral damage.

 

BBC: IRAN SENDING WEAPONS TO TALIBAN

The Iranian regime is sending weapons across the border to the Taliban in Afghanistan, claims a new BBC investigation.

“Taliban members said they had received Iranian-made arms from elements in the Iranian state and from smugglers. The UK says its troops have intercepted arms which it believes were given by a group within the Iranian state,” reports the BBC.

“Iranian-made weapons have improved the Taliban’s ability to attack the American military deployed in his area. ‘There’s a kind of mine called Dragon. Iran is sending it, we have got it,’ a Taliban commander told the BBC. ‘It’s directional, it destroys. If you lay an ordinary mine, it will cause only minor damage to Humvees or one of their big tanks. But if you lay a Dragon, it will be destroy it completely.’”

The British ambassador to Kabul, Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles, confirmed the BBC findings. “It’s a very dangerous game for Iran, a Shia state, to be supplying Sunni extremists like the Taliban,” he said.

 

CHIEF HAMAS AIDE “ASSASSINATED IN SYRIA”

Syrian opposition groups report that the chief aide to supreme Hamas leader Khaled Meshal was assassinated last week in the city of Homs, north of Damascus. The Freedom Party of Syria, which is exiled in the U.S., says Hisham al-Labadani was slain in broad daylight by unknown gunmen. The Syrian government has refused to comment on the report. Hamas has also stayed silent. If true, Labadani would be the most senior Hamas figure killed outside the Hamas heartland of Gaza.

Some experts say that the nature of the attack – carried out in broad daylight in front of many witnesses – pointed to the likelihood that the Syrian regime was itself behind it. The Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz speculated that it may have been a message from the regime of Syrian President Basher Assad for Hamas to halt cooperation with Iran. There is apparently a split among Assad’s inner circle between those that want to maintain close ties with Iran and those that want to distance Syria from Iran.

The Kuwaiti newspaper Al Rai reported earlier this month that Hamas head Meshal would soon leave Damascus to live in Sudan, another radical Islamic state, in a move stemming from Syria’s desire to advance indirect peace talks with Israel.

Meshal has been based in Damascus since his expulsion from Jordan ten years ago. Hamas denied the report of the move to Sudan.

 

CIA DIRECTOR CONFIRMS SYRIA WAS TRYING TO BUILD NUCLEAR WEAPONS

CIA Director Gen. Michael Hayden confirmed on Tuesday in a speech in Los Angeles that Syria was pursuing nuclear weapons last year.

“We were able last year to spoil a big secret, a project that could have provided Syria with plutonium for nuclear weapons,” Hayden said, according to a Reuters report. He also confirmed that North Korea was assisting in the Syrian effort.

The air strike on a suspected Syrian nuclear reactor last year was the result of intelligence cooperation that included a “foreign partner,” Hayden added. “Our foreign partnerships were critical to the final outcome,” he said. Hayden declined to say whether that partner was Israel.

Among past dispatches that dealt with this subject, please see:

* Syrian nuclear chief eliminated (& IDF soldiers risk lives to rescue Fatah men) (Aug. 5, 2008)
* Al-Jazeera: “U.S. Air Force, carrying tactical nuclear weapons, flew with Israel during Syria raid” (Nov. 2, 2007)
* Der Spiegel: North Korea trained Iranians at Syrian nuclear site (in the dispatch: Libya’s Gaddafi says Israel will kill Obama – “as it did JFK”) (June 23, 2008)
* Syria update: “This was one of the five most important acts in Israel’s history” (Oct. 22, 2007)


Watching “Friends” in Gaza as first ever Palestinian soap opera is postponed

September 14, 2008

* Photos of Blair’s sister-in-law happily shopping in fully-stocked Gaza stores
* BBC charity funded jihad propaganda
* Saudi girl has tongue cut out for becoming Christian
* Eight-year-old Saudi girl wants to divorce her 50-year-old husband

This dispatch contains various short “cultural” items.

 

CONTENTS

1. Blair’s sister-in-law: Gaza is “world’s largest concentration camp”
2. Paul McCartney resists pressure to scrap Israel concert
3. First ever Palestinian soap opera postponed “for not being sufficiently anti-Israel”
4. Watching “Friends” in Gaza
5. “Zohan” banned in Egypt

6. Sudanese man divorces wife for watching soap opera
7. Eight-year-old Saudi girl wants to divorce her 50-year-old husband
8. Saudi academic gets 600 lashes for “phone relationship” with female pupil
9. Saudi girl has tongue cut out, then killed for becoming Christian

10. Saudi women preach hate in leading British mosque
11. Why is the BBC refusing to make such programs?
12. BBC charity funded jihad propaganda
13. Another 30 bodies wash up on Yemeni coast
14. Iran wheelchair basketball team quits Paralympics over match against Israel

 

[All notes below by Tom Gross]

BLAIR’S SISTER-IN-LAW: GAZA IS “WORLD’S LARGEST CONCENTRATION CAMP”

In an appalling insult to Holocaust survivors everywhere, British journalist Lauren Booth said last week that the situation in Gaza was just like a “concentration camp,” and added that the “humanitarian crisis in Gaza is on the scale of Darfur.”

Booth’s brother-in-law, Quartet envoy to the Middle East Tony Blair, does not share her views. Her sister, Tony Blair’s wife Cherie Blair, once made comments appearing to justify Palestinian suicide bombs against Israeli school buses, but later apologized for the remarks.

Lauren Booth was recently issued a Palestinian passport by Hamas. Here is a photo from AFP (Agence France Presse) of Lauren Booth shopping in a grocery store in Gaza a few days before she made her Israeli “concentration camp” comments. Does it look like Auschwitz, or Darfur?

Here she is again in Gaza last week.

And here she is meeting Hamas terrorist leader, Ismail Haniyeh, who presents her with a special Palestinian “diplomatic passport”.

Booth writes for several British newspapers, including the Daily Mail, New Statesman, Mail on Sunday and the Sunday Times, and is often a guest on the BBC.

 

PAUL MCCARTNEY RESISTS PRESSURE TO SCRAP ISRAEL CONCERT

This is a follow up to an item in the dispatch “Italy admits it shielded Palestinian terrorists; & al-Jazeera apologizes to Israel” (Aug. 26, 2008).

Former Beatles star Paul McCartney said he will not succumb to the pressure being applied on him to cancel his performance in Israel later this month. “I was approached by different groups and political bodies who asked me not to come. I refused. I do what I think, and I have many friends who support Israel,” McCartney said in an interview with Israel’s Yediot Ahronot, which was reported on in other papers including the (London) Daily Telegraph and The Washington Post.

Far left and pro-Palestinian groups are trying to force academics and prominent cultural figures to boycott Israel. Jewish groups have said that singling out Israel, and Israel alone, for boycott, is a form of anti-Semitism.

Some prominent cultural figures, such as author Arundhati Roy and musician Brian Eno have endorsed such sanctions, while others, including soul artist Macy Gray, hip-hop group The Black-Eyed Peas and Pink Floyd’s Roger Waters have all refused to boycott the Jewish state and performed there in recent months.

 

FIRST EVER PALESTINIAN SOAP OPERA POSTPONED “FOR NOT BEING SUFFICIENTLY ANTI-ISRAELI”

The Palestine Broadcasting Corporation (PBC) has postponed the scheduled airing of a new TV series, “Matabb” (which means “speed bump” in Arabic), which was being billed as the first homemade Palestinian soap opera. Officials at PBC said that the German-funded series would be postponed until certain “offensive” scenes were changed.

The series was meant to be shown this month to coincide with the Ramadan festivities. The producers hoped for high ratings as Muslim families gathered at their homes each evening to break the day’s fast. But PBC officials charged that there were not enough anti-Israeli scenes in the program, according to the German press agency DPA (Deutsche Presse-Agentur), and some scenes therefore needed to be filmed again.

The program was jointly funded by Germany’s Goethe Institute and the European Commission, in an effort designed to encourage coexistence between Israel and the Palestinians.

Members of the Palestinian production team said the cancellation came as a complete surprise. They said they were told the series was “too liberal for official Palestinian state television.”

 

WATCHING “FRIENDS” IN GAZA

Extracted from a 3000-word article by Michael Kimmelman in The New York Times:

At the New Sound store in the middle of Gaza City, metal shelves bulge with dusty audiotapes extolling Hamas, Fatah and Islamic Jihad.

Alongside them are DVDs of not-yet-officially-released movies like “You Don’t Mess With the Zohan,” the Adam Sandler comedy about a Mossad agent turned hairdresser in a Palestinian-owned New York City salon, and pirated DVDs of American TV shows “24,” “Prison Break,” and “Friends.”

Do Gazans living under Hamas buy much Western music or Western movies? “Of course,” answered the owner, Amer Kihail.

Culture is a central battleground for control of Gaza. Gazans may loathe Israel but have worked there, and they’ve experienced Western life as many other Arabs haven’t.

 

“ZOHAN” BANNED IN EGYPT

Tom Gross adds:

While pirated versions are popular in Gaza, government censors in Egypt have blocked the release of the comedy “You Don’t Mess With the Zohan.” Although it signed a peace treaty with Israel three decades ago, Egypt’s regime will still not allow the showing of an American film with a fictional Israeli character who befriends a fictional Palestinian one.

“The film must be banned because it may be Israeli-slanted,” said prominent Arab critic Rafiq el-Sabban, who admitted he hadn’t actually seen the film.

Salah Issa, chief editor of the Egyptian culture ministry’s al-Qahira newspaper explained the ban by saying “any provocative film would just drive Egyptians crazy and may stir public unrest.”

But the columnist and playwright Ali Salem, who is known for enthusiastically supporting the normalization of relations with Israel, said “public unrest is only the imagination of the culture ministry and some intellectuals.” Salem asserts that “Egyptian people are not the least concerned with the issue of normalization, neither are they against it.”

Last month, the Israeli film “The Band’s Visit” was shown in a private screening arranged by the Israeli embassy in a Cairo hotel under tight security to an audience of 100 cultural and diplomatic figures, including 30 Egyptians. Even though the romantic comedy concerns an Egyptian police band, the film was not allowed to be shown at the Cairo international film festival last year.

 

SUDANESE MAN DIVORCES WIFE FOR WATCHING SOAP OPERA

Al-Watan reports from Khartoum that a Sudanese man has divorced his wife after returning home to find her watching the Turkish soap opera “Nur and Muhannd,” rather than carrying out household chores and preparing him lunch. His wife reportedly told him that she had already watched the preceding episode and was “desperate to see what happened next.” The husband then pronounced she was divorced according to Islamic law.

The wildly popular Turkish soap opera with Arabic voiceover is being broadcast into staunchly Islamic Sudan on a satellite channel.

 

EIGHT-YEAR-OLD SAUDI GIRL WANTS TO DIVORCE HER 50-YEAR-OLD HUSBAND

An eight-year-old girl, who is married to a man in his 50s, has filed for divorce at a Saudi court, the Saudi newspaper al-Watan reports.

She is believed to have been assisted by child-protection groups, who say young children are often given away in return for hefty dowries. There has recently been a spate of marriages involving the very young.

In another case in April, a Yemeni court annulled the marriage between an eight-year-old girl and a 28-year-old man. (See: Bahrain set to appoint Jewish woman as its ambassador to the U.S. (& Yemeni girl, 8, gets divorced) (April 29, 2008).

According to human rights activists, these marriages violate international agreements Saudi Arabia has signed. Some prominent Saudi preachers, including the grand mufti of Saudi Arabia, have also spoken out recently against old men taking young children as wives. He warned parents against marrying their young daughters to men who are “older than them by 50 and 60 years or more.”

However, in a recent Lebanon TV interview, a Saudi marriage official, Dr. Ahmad Al-Mu’bi, said: “The Prophet Muhammad is the model we follow. He took Aisha to be his wife when she was six, but he had sex with her only when she was nine.”

***

Here is another unusual headline, from the BBC website last month: “Nigerian Advises Against 86 Wives.

 

SAUDI ACADEMIC GETS 600 LASHES FOR “PHONE RELATIONSHIP” WITH FEMALE PUPIL

Arabic satellite TV station Al-Arabiya reports that a Saudi court has sentenced a chemistry professor to 600 lashes and 8 months in jail for engaging in a series of phone calls with a female student. The student was sentenced to 350 lashes and 4 months in prison. The academic, who worked in a teaching hospital in the south of the country, said the phone calls were innocent and concerned studies. He added that he hopes human rights groups will take up his case before the excruciatingly painful lashes are carried out.

 

SAUDI GIRL HAS TONGUE CUT OUT, THEN KILLED FOR BECOMING CHRISTIAN

A young girl in Saudi Arabia was brutally executed by her Muslim father last week after he learned his daughter had converted to Christianity.

Middle East business news website Zawya.com reported that the man, who is a prominent member of a “virtue committee,” first cut out his daughter’s tongue and then held a one-sided religious debate with her. He then burned his daughter alive.

Radical Muslims believe that the Prophet Mohammed ordered that Muslims who convert to other religions must be killed, often in an extremely brutal fashion.

 

SAUDI WOMEN PREACH HATE IN LEADING BRITISH MOSQUE

Hardline female preachers are radicalizing Muslim women at one of Britain’s most influential mosques, according to British news reports. The Saudi preachers were secretly filmed ordering women to murder homosexuals and ex-Muslims. The film was shown last week on Britain’s Channel 4 TV “Dispatches” program.

Undercover reporters recorded the lectures in the women’s section of Regent’s Park Mosque in London. An unnamed Saudi woman is seen mocking other religions, labeling Christianity “vile” and an “abomination.” Another woman claims Britain is a “land of evil.”

The female investigative reporters attended lectures for two months at the mosque, which had promised a clean-up after another “Dispatches” probe just 18 months ago exposed it for spreading extreme Islamic views.

During one sermon, a woman called Um Amira says: “He is Muslim, and he gets out of Islam. What are we going to do? We kill him, kill, kill. You have to kill him, you understand. This is Islam.”

These punishments, the preacher says, are to be implemented in a future Islamic state. “This is not to tell you to start killing people yet,” she continues. “There must be a Muslim leader, when the Muslim army becomes stronger, when Islam has grown enough.”

Regent’s Park Mosque is one of the biggest and most prestigious Islamic institutions in Britain. Opened in 1944 by King George VI, it can hold up to 5,000 worshippers. The Times of London recently called it “one of the most respected centers for moderate Islam in western Europe.”

The man in charge of the mosque, Dr Ahmed Al Dubayan, is Islamic Affairs attaché to the Saudi Embassy in London. “Dispatches” claims the mosque has links to the Saudi government, which is accused of spending billions of dollars to spread the Wahhabi message worldwide.

A TV reporter also visited the bookshop attached to the mosque and found books and DVDs still on sale, promoting extremist, anti-Semitic, misogynistic and intolerant messages. Unbelievers (“kuffaars”) are described in one DVD as: “Evil, wicked, mischievous people. You can see the evil in their face.” It says Jews “have abominated, filthy, disgusting beliefs. Their time will come like every other evil person’s time will come.”

 

WHY IS THE BBC REFUSING TO MAKE SUCH PROGRAMS?

Some British commentators are asking why independent channels like Channel 4 are making programs like the one described above, while the much more lavishly funded state-owned BBC is not.

Last week, British Sikhs and Hindus accused the BBC of “pro-Muslim bias” after a report revealed that since 2001 the BBC had made nine times more programs on Muslims than on Hindus. There are roughly even numbers of Hindus and Muslims in the UK. Hindu and Sikh leaders said most of the BBC programs on Muslims ignored Muslim extremism and painted a rosy picture about Muslim leaders.

Since 2001, the BBC made 41 faith programs on Islam, compared with just five on Hinduism and one on Sikhism.

Ashish Joshi, the chairman of the Network of Sikh Organization’s (NSO) media monitoring group, said “We are also BBC license-fee payers and we want to know why this has happened. The bias towards Islam at the expense of Hindus and particularly Sikhs is overwhelming and appears to be a part of BBC policy.”

 

BBC CHARITY FUNDED JIHAD PROPAGANDA

The Times of London reports that “The BBC’s Children in Need charity donated £20,000 to an organization that funded the propaganda activities of the July 7 bombers.”

The July 7 Islamist suicide attacks on London killed 52 people in 2005.

The BBC’s Children in Need charity donated around £20,000 to the Leeds Community School, Yorkshire, between 1999 and 2002 which went towards funding the activities of the terrorists behind the July 2005 attacks.

The school funded and shared premises with the Iqra Islamic bookshop where the suicide bombers Muhammad Siddique Khan and Shezhad Tanweer regularly met. Khan and Tanweer attempted to radicalize youths by showing propaganda films at the bookshop, including to Jermaine Lindsay, who went on to become the King’s Cross bomber.

They also produced a leaflet in the wake of September 11 blaming the attacks on a “Jewish conspiracy.”

The school also received large sums from other public bodies.

Martin Gilbertson, an IT technician who worked at the school and bookshop, said that he had been concerned about the activities of Tanweer and Khan. “They blamed everything on the ‘Jewish conspiracy‚’ they hated Western culture; it was like living with jihad on a daily basis,” he said.

David Ramsden, chief executive of Children in Need, said: “I’m incredibly concerned that we did make an award to Leeds Community School ... and any funding we’ve given to any project has been misused and not used to change the lives of disadvantaged children and young people makes me concerned and very sad. I can reassure the British public that we are very careful in who we fund and this allegation is a very rare one for us, but one that causes a great deal of concern.”

***

The BBC – which is under a British legal requirement to be impartial or risk lose its public funding – is also being criticized for not reporting on the beginning of the Russian invasion of Georgia last month, but instead leading its news bulletins that day with the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics.

Rival British TV stations ITV and Sky News led their bulletins with breaking news of the war on Europe’s southeastern boarder with Asia, but not the BBC, which never hesitates to highlight even the slightest incident involving the Israeli army.

 

ANOTHER 30 BODIES WASH UP ON YEMENI COAST

In the latest tragedy in the Gulf of Aden last week, at least 30 bodies washed up on the Yemeni shoreline. It is believed more than 100 refugees were forced from a small boat that was making its way from Somalia in the Horn of Africa to Yemen. Hundreds of Africans heading to the wealthy Arabian Peninsula in search of a better life have died recently, as have dozens washed up on the shores of Italy and Spain.

Tens of thousands of refugees are fleeing Somalia and its neighboring countries because of war, but are often forced from their boats by sailors who first take their money. Unseaworthy boats also regularly capsize with dozens of people aboard.

There is extraordinarily little international media reporting about these tragedies.

(See also this item “Roma girls dead on a beach in Italy, ignored by sunbathers”.)

 

IRAN WHEELCHAIR BASKETBALL TEAM QUITS PARALYMPICS OVER MATCH AGAINST ISRAEL

The International Wheelchair Basketball Federation has announced that the Iranian team has pulled out of the ongoing Paralympics tournament “due to their dissatisfaction with the schedule,” the Australian Broadcasting Company reported yesterday.

Iran’s withdrawal from the competition, held within the framework of the Paralympic Games for disabled athletes in Beijing, is believed to be because of the possibility that the Iranian players would face the Israeli team should they advance to the next round. Iran had already beat South Africa, Sweden and Japan in the preliminary round, and after its next game, was due to play the winner of the Israel-Canada match.

At the Beijing Olympics last month, Iranian swimmer Mohammad Alirezaei pulled out of a 100-meter breaststroke heat that included an Israeli competitor, citing illness. The International Olympic Committee said no violation had been found.

“We take both the athlete and the national Olympic committee at their word on this,” Olympic spokeswoman Giselle Davies said.

At the 2004 Athens Olympics, Iran’s judo world champion and gold medal favorite Arash Miresmaeili refused to compete against an Israeli opponent, publicly stating he wouldn’t appear alongside an Israeli. Iranian government officials were quoted in state media as congratulating him for pulling out.


How dare they be working class – and how dare she be a woman?

September 08, 2008

* The New York Times retracts one Palin story, but other smears continue, as the media elites try and destroy her candidacy.

* Personally, I don’t find it funny when New York magazine runs a headline “Levi Johnston and Fat Girlfriend Arrive in St. Paul.” Or when The Washington Post’s online magazine, Slate, launches a “Name Bristol Palin’s Baby” contest.

* I don’t want to even begin imagining the outcry if The Washington Post had instead compared Barack Obama to an animal.

* The snobs on The New York Times editorial page will never forgive Sarah Palin for going to the University of Idaho, or for having a husband who isn’t a lawyer or an investment banker, but a member of the United Steelworkers union, who doesn’t have a degree, whose mother (who is part Yup’ik) is a former secretary of the Alaska Federation of Natives, and whose grandmother is a member of the Curyung tribe.

* America appears to have got over its race problem, but sexism is alive and kicking.

* Taxpayer-funded Canadian TV columnist: Palin looks like a “porn actress.”

[This dispatch does not concern the Middle East. A dispatch on Mideast issues will follow in a couple of days.]

 

CONTENTS

1. The NY Times retracts one Palin story, but other smears continue (By Tom Gross)
2. Women’s organizations celebrate the advancement of women (Two cartoons)
3. “If the Dems want real change, quit nominating lawyers” (By Victor Davis Hanson)
4. “When Barack’s berserkers lost the plot” (By Nick Cohen, The Observer)
5. “Democrats must learn some respect” (By Clive Crook, Financial Times)
6. “The liberal media gangs up on a 17-year-old” (By Tom Gross / Sam Schulman)
7. “What Sarah Palin didn’t say” (By Claudia Rosett)
8. “Madam President: Hillary Clinton -v- Sarah Palin in 2012?” (By Tom Gross)
9. “Canadian TV repeats lies even after Daily Kos moves on” (By Tom Gross / Jon Kay)
10. Taxpayer-funded Canadian TV columnist: Palin looks like a “porn actress”
11. “ABC TV on Obama’s parentage: whoops”


YOU DON’T HAVE TO SUPPORT PALIN TO BE DISTURBED BY THE SMEARS

I attach an article by myself published in America today. It was also scheduled to be published in leading newspapers in Britain and Canada. However, senior editors at those papers overruled their commissioning editors, saying they would publish it but didn’t want to draw their readers’ attention to the fact that they too were caught out by the “Palin membership of the Alaska Independence Party” hoax. At least The New York Times, unlike other papers, have to their credit apologized to their readers for being caught out and running that hoax of their front page.

-- Tom Gross

 

FULL ARTICLES

HOW DARE THEY BE WORKING CLASS – AND HOW DARE SHE BE A WOMAN?

The NY Times retracts one Palin story, but other smears continue
By Tom Gross
National Review Online
September 8, 2008

New York Times writers are still sneering at Sarah Palin and her family on a daily basis. After all, these snobs will never forgive her for going to the University of Idaho, or for having a husband who isn’t a lawyer or an investment banker, but a member of the United Steelworkers union, who doesn’t have a degree, whose mother (who is part Yup’ik) is a former secretary of the Alaska Federation of Natives, and whose grandmother is a member of the Curyung tribe.

But at least The New York Times has now retracted the outrageous fabrication it printed on the front-page of Tuesday’s edition: that Sarah Palin was a member of the Alaska Independence Party for two years in the 1990s.

Other papers around the world continue to print this falsehood (in London, The Guardian’s front page had a banner headline which read “My fellow Alaskans”) and other lies generated by left-wing smear blogs continue to be lapped up by many in the mainstream media.

No, Sarah Palin didn’t support Pat Buchanan in the 1999-2000 campaign; she was an official on the campaign of Republican presidential contender Steve Forbes.

No, her eldest son Track (who is deploying to Iraq this week) didn’t join the National Guard because he was a drug addict.

No, her daughters Willow and Piper aren’t named after witches on TV.

No, she has nothing in common with a “porn actress” as one taxpayer-funded Canadian TV columnist suggested.

No, she’s not anti-Semitic. In fact, she has an Israeli flag in her office, and quietly turned up for services at a newly opened Wasilla synagogue to pay her respects.

No, she didn’t cut funding for unwed mothers, but increased it by 354 percent (and no, The Washington Post doesn’t appear to have corrected its story about this despite being asked to do so).

NO, SHE’S NOT A HORSE

But, yes, she did try to cut her own salary by $4,000 a year when she was mayor of Wasilla; and yes, she voted against the $4,000-a-year raise while on the city council.

And yes, she (like John McCain) did get it right when she supported the surge in Iraq, while Barack Obama and Joe Biden got it badly wrong.

And yes, she did take on the corrupt Republican Party establishment in Alaska, while hardly anyone is asking why Obama failed to ask questions about the notoriously corrupt Democratic Party machine in Chicago, or was happy to take huge donations from the now-jailed crook Tony Rezko.

Whatever else happens in this too-close-to call 2008 presidential election, I think we can happily conclude that America has come a long way in getting over its race problem. Thankfully, there has been very little racism directed against Barack Obama by anybody except for people on the absolute fringes.

But, as Hillary Clinton came to realize when she was given unfair treatment by the Obama-infatuated media, and as Sarah Palin has seen to a much greater extent in the period of a mere week, clearly the same cannot be said of America’s sexist problem.

Personally, I don’t find it funny when New York magazine runs a headline “Levi Johnston and Fat Girlfriend Arrive in St. Paul.” Or when The Washington Post’s online magazine, Slate, launches a “Name Bristol Palin’s Baby” contest.

Richard Cohen, leading columnist at The Washington Post thought it was acceptable (even amusing) to compare Sarah Palin to a horse, and so, judging by many of their online comments, did his readers. I don’t want to even begin imagining the outcry if The Washington Post had instead compared Barack Obama (or any other political candidate) to an animal.

I’m someone who shares the left’s purported views on equal rights, and essentially agrees with them on issues such as abortion, gay rights, and gun control (though firmly disagreeing with them on bigger issues such as the economy, foreign policy, and helping spread democracy abroad). But it is precisely the kind of McCarthyite-style witchhunt we have witnessed in the past week against the Palins by the left’s phony feminists and snooty media establishment that makes me – and many others I know – stay well clear of the official left.

(Tom Gross is a former Middle East correspondent for London’s Sunday Telegraph.)


TWO CARTOONS

Women’s organizations celebrate the advancement of women.

Two Palin cartoons here.

 

THE PROBLEM WITH LAWYERS

Tom Gross writes: In this article, historian Victor Davis Hanson points out that the Democratic Party keeps losing presidential elections because they keep nominating lawyers as candidates. Every Democratic presidential nominee for president and vice president in the last seven elections – except Al Gore, who dropped out of law school to run for Congress – has been a lawyer.

If the Republicans win this year, it may well be because – like George Bush and Dick Cheney, and Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush – John McCain and Sarah Palin aren’t members of the legal culture.

As Hanson writes, “The problem is that lawyers usually do not run companies, defend the country, lead people, build things, grow food, or create capital.”

“If this year Democrats were looking for populist candidates from diverse backgrounds and training who talked and thought differently from those of the past, then why didn’t they nominate someone who was not trained in writing legalese?”

***

The Dems’ Legal Eagles: Want real change? Quit nominating lawyers!
By Victor Davis Hanson
The National Review
September 5, 2008

The 2008 presidential campaign is supposed to be a referendum on “change” – who brings it and who doesn’t.

Real change, however, hasn’t yet proven to mean new politics.

The “hope and change” Barack Obama sounds like a traditional Northern liberal who always wants to raise taxes on the upper classes and businesses, expand government services, and provide more state assistance to the middle class and poor.

“Maverick” John McCain talks like a conventional Western or Southern conservative in favor of spending cuts, across-the-board lower taxes, and smaller government.

This year the media seem to think change means race and sex – whether Barack Obama’s background of mixed racial ancestry or the gender of Democratic primary candidate Hillary Clinton and Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin.

It’s certainly true that either the next president or next vice president will not be a white male. But does that mean de facto that the country will be run any differently?

There is, however, one area where we might have seen real change. The Democrats could have not nominated another lawyer. This may partly explain why former military officer John McCain and working-mom Sarah Palin are polling near even with Obama and his running mate, Joe Biden, in a year that otherwise favors the Democrats.

A snowmobiling, fishing, and hunting mom of five who was trained as a journalist seems like a breath of fresh air – and accentuates the nontraditional background of former naval officer John McCain. If the Republicans win, it may well be because – like George Bush and Dick Cheney, or Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush – they weren’t members of the legal culture.

On the Democratic side, Barack Obama got out of Harvard Law School, worked for a firm, offered his legal expertise as a community organizer, and went into politics. Joe Biden graduated from law school and almost immediately ran for office.

In the Democratic primary, winner Obama, runner-up Hillary Clinton, and third-place finisher John Edwards were all lawyers. In 2004, both Democratic nominees, John Kerry and Edwards, were lawyers. Al Gore, who ran in 2000, left law school without a degree and went into politics. His running mate, Joe Lieberman, was a Yale-trained lawyer. Mike Dukakis, the 1988 Democratic presidential nominee, was a Harvard-trained lawyer and ran with lawyer Lloyd Bentsen.

In fact, every Democratic presidential nominee for president and vice president in the last seven elections – except Gore, who dropped out of law school to run for Congress – has been a lawyer.

What saved Bill Clinton in 1992 and 1996 was the presence in the race of third-party conservative candidate Ross Perot – and the image of Clinton as a Southern moderate, which seemed to reassure voters that this particular Yale-trained lawyer was nevertheless not quite another Democratic nominee like Walter Mondale or Dukakis.

Of course, there have been Republican nominees and presidents who were lawyers – Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford and Bob Dole – but recently far less so than the Democrats, as the administrations of Ronald Reagan and the two Bushes attest.

So, what’s wrong with the Democratic nominee once again being a lawyer? After all, legal minds are trained to think precisely and evaluate both sides of an issue.

The problem is that lawyers usually do not run companies, defend the country, lead people, build things, grow food, or create capital.

If this year Democrats were looking for populist candidates from diverse backgrounds and training who talked and thought differently from those of the past, then why didn’t they nominate someone who was not trained in writing legalese and working the government legal labyrinth?

Instead, they needed different sorts, candidates who might have sounded a little rougher, a little less condescending, and a little more like most voters. Most Americans have never been in – and never want to be in – a courtroom.

In the past, law school has not necessarily been considered ideal presidential training. Harry Truman was audacious perhaps because he had tried and failed as a haberdasher. Dwight Eisenhower learned about leadership from his years as a general. George H. W. Bush was a businessman and Ronald Reagan an actor. Even unpopular presidents like Jimmy Carter (farmer) and George W. Bush (businessman) brought different perspectives to the job.

Change for Democrats this year was not a new strain of liberal politics or a different race or gender. Instead, they needed to have run candidates who talked, thought, and acted differently from their usual run-of-the-mill sorts.

And that meant someone other than the same old, same old legal eagles who appear glib – but so often manage to lose in November.

 

MY COLLEAGUES IN THE AMERICAN LIBERAL PRESS HAD LITTLE TO FEAR AT THE START OF THE WEEK...

Tom Gross writes: This article was published yesterday in The Observer, which is the Sunday edition of Britain’s left-liberal Guardian newspaper. Columnist Nick Cohen writes:

“Journalists who believe in women’s equality should not spread sexual smears about a candidate, or snigger at her teenage daughter’s pregnancy, or declare that a mother with a young family cannot hold down a responsible job for the pragmatic reason that they will look like gross hypocrites if they do...

“In Britain, the most snobbish attacks on Margaret Thatcher did not come from aristocrats but from the communist historian Eric Hobsbawm, who opined that Thatcherism was the ‘anarchism of the lower middle classes’ and the liberal Jonathan Miller, who deplored her ‘odious suburban gentility.’”

***

When Barack’s berserkers lost the plot
By Nick Cohen
The Observer (UK)
September 7, 2008

My colleagues in the American liberal press had little to fear at the start of the week. Their charismatic candidate was ahead in virtually every poll. George W Bush was so unpopular that conservatives were scrambling around for reasons not to invite the Republican President to the Republican convention. Democrats had only to maintain their composure and the White House would be theirs. During the 1997 British general election, the late Lord Jenkins said that Tony Blair was like a man walking down a shiny corridor carrying a precious vase. He was the favourite and held his fate in his hands. If he could just reach the end of the hall without a slip, a Labour victory was assured. The same could have been said of the American Democrats last week. But instead of protecting their precious advantage, they succumbed to a spasm of hatred and threw the vase, the crockery, the cutlery and the kitchen sink at an obscure politician from Alaska.

For once, the postmodern theories so many of them were taught at university are a help to the rest of us. As a Christian, conservative anti-abortionist who proved her support for the Iraq War by sending her son to fight in it, Sarah Palin was ‘the other’ - the threatening alien presence they defined themselves against. They might have soberly examined her reputation as an opponent of political corruption to see if she was truly the reformer she claimed to be. They might have gently mocked her idiotic creationism, while carefully avoiding all discussion of the racist conspiracy theories of Barack Obama’s church.

But instead of following a measured strategy, they went berserk. On the one hand, the media treated her as a sex object. The New York Times led the way in painting Palin as a glamour-puss in go-go boots you were more likely to find in an Anchorage lap-dancing club than the Alaska governor’s office.

On the other, liberal journalists turned her family into an object of sexual disgust: inbred rednecks who had stumbled out of Deliverance. Palin was meant to be pretending that a handicapped baby girl was her child when really it was her wanton teenage daughter’s. When that turned out to be a lie, the media replaced it with prurient coverage of her teenage daughter, who was, after all, pregnant, even though her mother was not going to do a quick handover at the maternity ward and act as if the child was hers.

Hatred is the most powerful emotion in politics. At present, American liberals are not fighting for an Obama presidency. I suspect that most have only the haziest idea of what it would mean for their country. The slogans that move their hearts and stir their souls are directed against their enemies: Bush, the neo-cons, the religious right.

In this, American liberals are no different from the politically committed the world over. David Cameron knew that he would never be Prime Minister until he had killed the urgent hatred of the Conservative party in liberal England. A measure of his success is that hardly anyone now is caught up by the once ubiquitous feeling that no compromise is too great if it stops the Tories regaining power. Hate can sell better than hope.

When a hate campaign goes wrong, however, disaster follows. And everything that could go wrong with the campaign against Palin did. American liberals forgot that the public did not know her. By the time she spoke at the Republican convention, journalists had so lowered expectations that a run-of-the-mill speech would have been enough to win the evening.

As it was, her family appeared on stage without a goitre or a club foot between them, and Palin made a fighting speech that appealed over the heads of reporters to the public we claim to represent. ‘I’m not going to Washington to seek their good opinion,’ she said as she deftly detached journalists from their readers and viewers. ‘I’m going to Washington to serve the people of this country.’

English leftists made the same mistake of allowing their hatred to override their judgment after the Iraq war. If they had confined themselves to charging Tony Blair with failing to find the weapons of mass destruction he promised were in Iraq, and sending British troops into a quagmire, they might have forced him out. They were so consumed by loathing, however, they insisted that he had lied, which he clearly had not. They set the bar too low and Blair jumped it with ease. ‘When a man believes that any stick will do, he at once picks up a boomerang,’ said GK Chesterton, and when the politically committed go on a berserker you should listen for the sound of their own principles smacking them in the face.

Journalists who believe in women’s equality should not spread sexual smears about a candidate, or snigger at her teenage daughter’s pregnancy, or declare that a mother with a young family cannot hold down a responsible job for the pragmatic reason that they will look like gross hypocrites if they do. Before Palin, we saw hypocrisy of the right when shock jocks who had spent years denouncing feminism came over all politically correct when Bill Clinton had an affair with Monica Lewinsky.

In Britain, the most snobbish attacks on Margaret Thatcher did not come from aristocrats but from the communist historian Eric Hobsbawm, who opined that Thatcherism was the ‘anarchism of the lower middle classes’ and the liberal Jonathan Miller, who deplored her ‘odious suburban gentility’. More recently, George Osborne, of the supposedly compassionate Conservative party, revealed himself to be a playground bully when he derided Gordon Brown for being ‘faintly autistic’.

In an age when politics is choreographed, voters watch out for the moments when the public-relations facade breaks down and venom pours through the cracks. Their judgment is rarely favourable when it does. Barack Obama knows it. All last week, he was warning American liberals to stay away from the Palin family. He understands better than his supporters that it is not a politician’s enemies who lose elections, but his friends.

 

FT: “DEMOCRATS MUST LEARN SOME RESPECT”

Columnist Clive Crook of the openly Pro-Obama Financial Times, makes some interesting observations in a piece published today titled “Democrats must learn some respect.” He writes:

The trouble is, the Democrats lack respect for the objects of their solicitude [ordinary people]. Their sympathy comes mixed with disdain, and even contempt...

Curiously, whereas the conservative media know they are conservative, much of the liberal media believe themselves to be neutral...

Because it was so unexpected, Sarah Palin’s nomination for the vice-presidency jolted these attitudes to the surface... her selection induced an apoplectic fit...

If only the Democrats could contain their sense of entitlement to govern in a rational world, and their consequent distaste for wide swathes of the U.S. electorate, they might gain the unshakeable grip on power they feel they deserve...

The Palin nomination could still misfire for Mr McCain, but the liberal reaction has made it a huge success so far. To avoid endlessly repeating this mistake, Democrats need to learn some respect...

 

JOHN EDWARDS HAD A BABY?

The liberal media gangs up on a 17-year-old
By Tom Gross
The National Review (Media Blog)
September 7, 2008

As I noted in my article (above), the campaign by America’s phony feminists and snooty media establishment against Sarah Palin and her family that began mere seconds after John McCain picked her, has produced many outstandingly nasty comments.

But perhaps the most telling bias of all can be observed when one compares the coverage Palin’s poor teenage daughter received with the complete pass given by the liberal media to the would-be Democratic Party presidential candidate John Edwards, whose adultery during the campaign, even as his wife lay terminally ill, they did so much to cover up.

Sam Schulman makes some good points too:

1. Bristol Palin’s pregnancy was broadcast to the world as soon – or sooner than – it was discovered. John Edwards’s mistress Rielle Hunter’s pregnancy was covered up by major media sources even though it was well documented.

2. Rielle Hunter received: Rent-free housing. $15,000 a month from John Edwards’s campaign treasurer. The use of a private jet.

Bristol Palin received: the support of her community, Wasilla, the fourth-largest city in Alaska. The support of her mother and father. The love of her baby’s father. Period.

3. Rielle Hunter and John Edwards received: Privacy and solicitude from The New York Times, The Washington Post, network news, cable news – everyone in the respectable world media, except Mickey Kaus.

Bristol Palin received Internet rumor-mongering widely reported in the mainstream press.

4. Rielle Hunter and John Edwards continued to lie about their relationship after it was revealed.

Bristol Palin’s family gave a simple, dignified statement of the truth of the situation after it was revealed.

5. Bristol Palin and the father of her baby are 17 or 18 – and their relationship concerns themselves and their parents.

The combined age of John Edwards and Rielle Hunter is close to, if not over, a century. John Edwards has a mortally ill wife and three other young children to be concerned about.

6. The number of column inches and network TV coverage devoted to Bristol Palin compared to John Edwards is – immeasurable.

 

WHAT SARAH PALIN DIDN’T SAY

Sarah’s speech
By Tom Gross
The National Review (Media Blog)
September 3, 2008

Sarah Palin is preparing to take the stage at the Republican convention, and here is a sneak preview of what she might say (as told to writer Claudia Rosett):

“There are a few more things you need to know about me.

“As a troubled teenager, I myself used cocaine and marijuana (yes, I inhaled), and as an adult, I attended and took my family to (and my inspiration from) a church where the preaching included hate-speech about America and assorted ethnic and religious groups.

“In my business career, before entering politics, I had talents that allowed me, simply by reading the newspaper, to earn a 10,000% return on a $1,000 investment in cattle futures in the space of 10 months.

“While holding elected office, my experience included the pursuit of assorted adulterous liaisons, including intimate activities in my landmark government office with an intern less than half my age, though as I regard it, I did not have sex with that person (depending on the meaning of “is”). When I got caught, my spouse denounced my critics as members of a vast political conspiracy.

“I could add a great deal more to this list (though please remember that when I got caught taking home state silverware, I eventually did send it back), but let us now turn to the mighty issue of the hour…”

That scene, of course, is fantasy, as Claudia Rosett points out: “Sarah Palin won’t say these words, because they do not apply to her. But they do apply to the three most prominent political figures who paraded across the stage at the Democratic convention in Denver last week, Barack Obama, and Hillary and Bill Clinton – to wild ovations from the crowd.”

 

MADAM PRESIDENT

Click here to see a cartoon and note by myself welcoming the possible 2012 presidential race between Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin.

 

CANADA’S STATE-FUNDED TV, IN THE FOOTSEPS OF DAILY KOS

Canada’s CBC continues the lies even after Daily Kos has moved on
By Tom Gross
The National Review (Media Blog)
September 4, 2008

On Monday, even the Daily Kos admitted that the disgusting smear that they had helped spread – that Sarah Palin wasn’t really the mother of her 4-month-old baby Trig – wasn’t true.

The rest of the media then moved on to bashing Palin’s defenseless teenage daughter, Bristol.

Yet on Tuesday, star reporter Neil McDonald of Canada’s taxpayer-funded CBC reported this gutter lie as if it might be true.

How, asks Jonathan Kay in the posting below, could CBC sink so low?

 

TAXPAYER-FUNDED CANADIAN TV COLUMNIST: PALIN LOOKS LIKE A “PORN ACTRESS”

This commentator, Heather Mallick, is a columnist at the taxpayer-funded Canadian Broadcasting Corp (CBC). What she says about Sarah Palin and the people who support her is jaw-dropping.

Her article begins:

I assume John McCain chose Sarah Palin as his vice-presidential partner in a fit of pique because the Republican money men refused to let him have the stuffed male shirt he really wanted. She added nothing to the ticket that the Republicans didn’t already have sewn up, the white trash vote, the demographic that sullies America’s name inside and outside its borders yet has such a curious appeal for the right.

So why do it?

It’s possible that Republican men, sexual inadequates that they are, really believe that women will vote for a woman just because she’s a woman. I mean, I know men have their secret meetings at which they pledge to do manly things, like being irresponsible with their semen and postponing household repairs with glue and used matches. Guys will be guys, obviously.

Palin was not a sure choice, not even for the stolidly Republican ladies branch of Citizens for a Tackier America....

John Doyle, the cleverest critic in Canada, comes right out and calls Palin an Alaska hillbilly. Damn his eyes, I wish I’d had the wit to come up with it first. It’s safer than “white trash” but I’ll pluck safety out of the nettle danger. Or something.

... Palin has a toned-down version of the porn actress look favoured by this decade’s woman, the overtreated hair, puffy lips and permanently alarmed expression. Bristol has what is known in Britain as the look of the teen mum, the “pramface.” Husband Todd looks like a roughneck; Track, heading off to Iraq, appears terrified. They claim to be family obsessed while being studiously terrible at parenting. What normal father would want Levi “I’m a fuckin’ redneck” Johnson prodding his daughter?

(You can read it all, if you must, here.)

 

ABC TV ON OBAMA’S PARENTAGE

A moment for the history books.” Whoops.


Ahmadinejad: Zionists behind S. Ossetia, Abkhazia conflicts (& 63% of Americans support Israeli strike on Iran)

September 04, 2008

* Dutch spy agency: “U.S. to strike Iran in coming weeks”
* Saudi authorities “arrest those who display picture of Hizbullah leader”

* This is the second part of a two-part dispatch on Iran. This part deals mainly with military and security issues; the first part, titled “Top Iranian mullah compares women to donkeys (& a note on Sarah Palin),” dealt with human rights, and can be read here.

 

CONTENTS

1. Iran expels Al-Arabiya reporter; Jews “buying up Iraq”
2. Ahmadinejad: Zionists behind South Ossetia, Abkhazia conflicts
3. Hamas welcomes Russian recognition for Abkhazia, S. Ossetia
4. Poll: 63% of Americans support Israeli strike on Iran
5. Iran says 4,000 atomic centrifuges working: report
6. Israel “won’t allow Iranian nukes”
7. U.S. rebuffs Israeli request for arms geared toward Iran strike
8. German, Austrian and Dutch firms helping Tehran
9. Dutch spy agency: “U.S. to strike Iran in coming weeks”
10. Russia threatens to supply Iran with top new missile system
11. Russian navy planning greater presence in Syria
12. Ahmadinejad lauded by key NATO member Turkey
13. Iran “supplies Hizbullah missiles that can hit most of Israel”
14. Hizbullah downs Lebanese helicopter
15. Hizbullah attempts to kidnap Israelis abroad prevented
16. Attack on El Al in Canada thwarted
17. Saudi authorities “arrest those who display picture of Hizbullah leader”
18. Another minor executed
19. There are two main values in life: holy war and martyrdom
20. First Iranian signs deal with an NBA team


[Note by Tom Gross]

IRAN EXPELS AL-ARABIYA REPORTER; JEWS “BUYING UP IRAQ”

Iran on Tuesday banned the Tehran bureau chief for the Saudi-owned Al-Arabiya news channel and told him to leave the country as soon as possible. Iranian student organizations supporting the Ahmadinejad government have welcomed the move against Al-Arabiya, saying some Arab countries are involved in a conspiracy against Islam in the same way that “the Jews conspired against the prophet Muhammad.”

And Aftab News today quotes a report by the Qatari newspaper Arab Online claiming Iraqi Jews who had been living in Israel are buying real estate “five times the real price” in the Iraqi city of Kirkuk in order to “erect a new Jerusalem.”

 

AHMADINEJAD: ZIONISTS BEHIND SOUTH OSSETIA, ABKHAZIA CONFLICTS

In the latest in a series of lies about Jews and Israelis, Iranian President Ahmadinejad has alleged that there is “evidence at hand which prove Zionists are behind the South Ossetia and Abkhazia events,” reports the Iranian Islamic news agency, IRNA.

Ahmadinejad made the remarks during a visit to Dushanbe, the capital city of Tajikistan, formerly known as Stalinabad.

“We have information which show Zionists have a central role in the South Ossetia and Abkhazia cases,” said Ahmadinejad in an interview with reporters on the sidelines of the 8th Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit.

Meanwhile, the Kremlin has announced that the Georgian region of South Ossetia will join “one united Russian state,” and Russia will open military bases there.

(For background on the Georgia crisis, please see “The lessons for Israel and other small democracies from the Georgian conflict.”)

***

Incidentally, in the peak week of fighting between Georgia and Russia (the second full week of August), when thousands of civilians were killed, injured or driven from their homes, the leading human rights group, Amnesty International, harshly condemned Israel in three separate documents (even though the death rate in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is at an 8-year low), but issued only four neutral statements related to the war in the Caucuses, reports NGO Monitor.

 

HAMAS WELCOMES RUSSIAN RECOGNITION FOR ABKHAZIA, SOUTH OSSETIA

The Palestinian Islamist movement Hamas has become one of the only groups outside Russia to recognize Georgia’s breakaway regions Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

Last week, in a move condemned by virtually the entire world, even by China, Russia recognized the provinces as independent states. The Georgian population was ethnically cleansed from the area by Russian-led forces last month.

Perhaps Hamas would like Russia to recognize Gaza as an independent state too.

 

POLL: 63% OF AMERICANS SUPPORT ISRAELI STRIKE ON IRAN

A new poll has found that 63 percent of Americans say they would support a preemptive Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities, should international diplomatic efforts to curb its nuclear program fail, and 55 percent of those polled said they would support a surgical strike by the U.S. on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

96 percent of those polled said a nuclear Iran would pose an imminent threat to Israel, and 87 percent said it would pose a threat to the U.S.

Furthermore, 90 percent said that should Iran possess nuclear weapons, they were concerned it may pass them, or related technology, to terror organizations such as Hamas and Hizbullah.

The poll, commissioned by The Israel Project, was conducted by leading pollsters Neil Newhouse of Public Opinion Strategies and Stan Greenberg of Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research. 800 U.S. adults were surveyed.

 

IRAN SAYS 4,000 ATOMIC CENTRIFUGES WORKING

Reuters reports that Iran has succeeded in installing 4,000 working nuclear centrifuges in the Natanz uranium enrichment facility – enough to churn out weapons-grade uranium for dozens of nuclear warheads.

The Islamic Republic has also announced it will install an additional 3,000 centrifuges in coming months, followed by thousands more.

 

ISRAEL “WON’T ALLOW IRANIAN NUKES”

Israel has put plans for a unilateral military strike against Iran into high gear, reports the Israel daily Ma’ariv.

The paper said that – fearing the U.S. won’t now take action in time – the Israeli cabinet held a special session three weeks ago where it approved plans to stop Iran from going nuclear “at any price” should diplomatic efforts to derail Iran’s suspected nuclear weapons program fail.

There is a very real possibility that Iran under its present messianic Islamic government, whose president genuinely believes in “end of days” theories, and in the virtues of destroying Jews and infidels even if he makes “martyrs” of his own people, could launch a nuclear strike against Israel.

Ephraim Sneh, a Labor party Knesset member, has sent an eight-point document to both U.S. presidential candidates, saying, “There is no government in Jerusalem that would ever reconcile itself to a nuclear Iran. When it is clear Iran is on the verge of acquiring nuclear weapons, an Israeli military strike to prevent this will be seriously considered.”

Sneh said the maximum window of opportunity for non-military options to stop Iran from going nuclear is 18 to 24 months.

 

U.S. REBUFFS ISRAELI REQUEST FOR ARMS GEARED TOWARD IRAN STRIKE

Given the fact American-led forces control most of the airspace around Iran (in Iraq, Afghanistan, the gulf states, and so on), without American cooperation it would be extremely difficult for Israel to carry out any such mission.

So far, Israel has not received American authorization to use U.S.-controlled Iraqi airspace. The U.S. has also refused to sell to Israel advanced U.S.-made warplanes which would make it possible for Israel to strike without the need to land planes in one of the countries neighboring Iran in order to refuel.

U.S. National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen both visited Israel in June and, according to The Washington Post, told senior Israeli defense officials that the U.S. would not allow Israeli planes to overfly Iraq en route to Iran.

Vice President Dick Cheney is apparently willing to help Israel (in part because he sees it as a U.S. national interest and also because the Saudis are privately begging the Americans to let Israel take out Iran’s nuclear program) but Secretary of Defense Robert Gates opposes an attack on Iran.

Instead, the Americans have offered Israel permission to use a global early warning radar system, implying that the U.S. is pushing Israel to settle for defensive measures only. This is not something Israel can live with when it comes to nuclear weapons, say analysts.

The U.S. says it will deploy high-powered, early-warning missile radars in the Negev desert, to be manned by U.S. military personnel. The radars, known as X-Band, will be linked to a U.S. satellite-based alert network.

 

GERMAN, AUSTRIAN AND DUTCH FIRMS HELPING TEHRAN

Ephraim Sneh also visited Switzerland and Austria last week in an attempt to lobby those two states. Both countries have announced massive long-term investments in Iranian gas and oil fields for the next decade. “Talk of preventing another Jewish Holocaust didn’t interest these guys,” Sneh said.

Separately, the U.S.-based Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Austrian political organization “Stop the Bomb” have sharply criticized Austrian energy giants OMV and Royal Dutch Shell over their sponsorship of the 2nd Iranian Gas Export Conference to be held on October 4 and 5 in Tehran.

OMV has signed a $35 billion deal with Iran to develop the South Par gas field. The Austrian government is the largest shareholder in OMV.

And a Jerusalem Post investigation of the gas conference has found that Deutsche Bank and Dresdner Bank, two German Banks who pulled out of in Iran in October 2007, are listed as “correspondent banks” on the registration form for the fee covering conference attendance in Tehran. The U.S. Treasury Department is pressuring German banks to sever financial transactions with Iran.

Jewish and other groups demonstrated last week in Siegen, Germany, to protest against a major business deal by a local gas technology company, Steiner-Prematechnik-Gastec (SPG), to provide its expertise in turning gas into liquid fuel at three plants in the Islamic Republic. By contrast, the French company Total and the Norwegian company Statoil have now pulled out of projects in Iran.

 

“DUTCH SPY AGENCY: U.S. TO STRIKE IRAN IN COMING WEEKS”

Contradicting other reports that say a U.S. airstrike on Iran’s nuclear program is off the table for the present time, the largest daily paper in the Netherlands, De Telegraaf, reported last weekend that its nation’s intelligence agency has been working closely with the CIA to help prepare a planned U.S. air attack on Iran.

De Telegraaf added in a front-page article that the Dutch intelligence service, the AIVD, has called off an operation aimed at infiltrating and sabotaging Iran’s weapons industry due to an assessment that a U.S. attack on the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program is imminent.

The report claimed that the Dutch operation had been “extremely successful,” and had been halted because the U.S. military was planning to hit targets that were “connected with the Dutch espionage action.”

The impending airstrike on Iran was to be carried out by unmanned aircraft “within weeks,” the report claimed, quoting “well placed” sources.

According to De Telegraaf, information gleaned from the AIVD’s operation in Iran has provided several of the targets that are to be attacked in the strike, including “parts for missiles and launching equipment, and this information has been shared with the CIA.”

 

RUSSIA THREATENS TO SUPPLY IRAN WITH TOP NEW MISSILE SYSTEM AS “COLD WAR” ESCALATES

The (London) Sunday Telegraph reported last weekend in what the paper calls “an exclusive” (in fact it was already reported on this website some days earlier) that: “U.S. intelligence fears the Kremlin will supply the sophisticated S-300 system to Tehran if Washington pushes through NATO membership for its pro-Western neighbors Georgia and Ukraine, The Sunday Telegraph has learned.”

“The proposed deal is causing huge alarm in the U.S. and Israel as the S-300 can track 100 targets at once and fire on planes up to 75 miles away. That would make it a ‘game-changer,’ greatly improving Iranian defenses against any air strike on its nuclear sites, according to Pentagon adviser Dan Goure. ‘This is a system that scares every Western air force,’ he said.”

Tom Gross adds: The S-300, is one of the most advanced multi-target anti-aircraft-missile systems in the world. It has a reported ability to track up to 100 targets simultaneously while engaging up to 12 at the same time. It has a range of about 200 kilometers and can hit targets at altitudes of 27,000 meters.

A senior Israeli airforce officer said last week that Israel needed to do “everything possible” to prevent the S-300 from reaching the region.

 

RUSSIAN NAVY PLANNING GREATER PRESENCE IN SYRIA

Russia is also stepping up cooperation with Iran’s close ally, Syria.

The Russian navy will make more use of Syrian ports as part of increased military presence in the Mediterranean, a Russian diplomat said at the end of last week.

The announcement comes as tensions rise between Moscow and the West over Russia’s role in Georgia. As noted in a previous dispatch, Syrian President Bashar Assad was one of the only leaders in the world to back Russia in its recent assault on Georgia, and even flew to Moscow on a solidarity visit in mid-August as Russian troops were ethnically cleansing Georgians from South Ossetia.

“Our navy presence in the Mediterranean will increase. Russian vessels will be visiting Syria and other friendly ports more frequently,” Igor Belyaev, the Russian charge d’affaires, told reporters in the Syrian capital.

Russia has sold Syria weapons systems in the past, including the advanced surface-to-air Strelets system, and its warships already had been calling on Syria’s northern port of Tartous. Many of Iran’s weapons systems also come from Russian suppliers.

 

AHMADINEJAD LAUDED BY KEY NATO MEMBER TURKEY

There is concern in Israel that Iranian President Ahmadinejad was so strongly lauded during his visit last month to Turkey, which is supposedly a close ally of Israel and a key NATO member. Photos here.

 

IRAN “SUPPLIES HIZBULLAH MISSILES THAT CAN HIT MOST OF ISRAEL”

The London-based Arabic-language newspaper Al-Quds al-Arabi reports that Iran has equipped Hizbullah with longer-range advanced missiles capable of accurately hitting targets throughout most of Israel. The paper added that they are much more lethal than the missiles that Hizbullah used to kill over 100 Israeli civilians in towns and villages throughout northern Israel in the 2006 Hizbullah-Israel war.

According to the report, the rockets can accurately hit civilian targets in most of Israel, including Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, and would be used if Israel launches a strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

In a separate report, the Kuwaiti newspaper al-Siyasa reported last Tuesday that 300 Iranian experts were working to build an array of weaponry in the mountainous regions of western Lebanon.

Iranian defense experts are also reportedly in Lebanon in an effort to assist Hizbullah in developing anti-aircraft capabilities.

 

HIZBULLAH DOWNS LEBANESE HELICOPTER

Iran’s client militia Hizbullah shot down a Lebanese government helicopter over a village 12-miles north of the Israeli border last Thursday, apparently thinking it was an Israeli helicopter. The officer who was piloting the chopper was killed and two others were wounded.

 

HIZBULLAH ATTEMPTS TO KIDNAP ISRAELIS ABROAD PREVENTED

Israeli counterterrorism officials have revealed that they have prevented five separate attempts by the Iranian proxy militia Hizbullah to kidnap Israeli citizens outside Israel in recent weeks. Details of the events remain subject to Israeli government censorship to prevent Israeli operatives being exposed.

All of the attempts were foiled with the assistance of foreign intelligence agencies, according to Yediot Ahronot. Hizbullah is known to have cells in West Africa, South America, Asia and Canada.

 

ATTACK ON EL AL IN CANADA THWARTED

Plans by an unknown group to attack staff of Israel’s national carrier El Al in Canada have been thwarted, Israel’s Channel Two television reported yesterday.

Security procedures for crews overnighting at hotels between flights have now been changed, it added. Security sources said that the cell apparently belonged to Hizbullah.

El Al has been targeted for attack several times in the past. For example, two people were killed in July 2002 when a gunman opened fire on El Al passengers at Los Angeles International Airport. An Israeli security official shot dead the gunman before he murdered any more passengers.

In 2005, seven Dutch youths planning to attack an El Al plane were arrested. In June 2006, Swiss authorities revealed an attempt by a Muslim terror cell to attack an El Al plane. In November 2006, the German government arrested six Muslims on suspicion of planning to blow up an El Al plane after takeoff from Frankfurt.

 

SAUDI AUTHORITIES “ARREST THOSE WHO DISPLAY PICTURE OF HIZBULLAH LEADER”

According to the Iranian weekly Sobh-e Sadeq, the mouthpiece of Iranian Supreme leader Ali Khamenei circulated among the Revolutionary Guards, Saudi authorities have arrested a man for public display of Lebanese Hizbullah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah’s picture.

 

ANOTHER MINOR EXECUTED

One week after the execution of Reza Hejazi, another child offender, Behnam Zare, has been hanged in Iran. Zare’s lawyer – who represents 25 other minors on death row – says his client’s execution was unexpected. He claims Zare was hanged on a day when sentences are not normally carried out at Shiraz prison.

There is a photo of Zare here.

 

THERE ARE TWO MAIN VALUES IN LIFE: HOLY WAR AND MARTYRDOM

The veteran Iranian affairs analyst Menashe Amir comments, in a MERIA symposium:

I would like to say that I am neither optimistic nor pessimistic about the future of the Iranian impact on the Middle East, because it very much depends on the policy and the action of the Western countries, especially Europe and the United States, and also the Arab countries.

Regarding Ahmadinejad’s philosophy, he thinks that Islam is a young and dynamic movement that is winning, and he is ready to sacrifice. Ahmadinejad believes that there are two main values in life: One is jihad (holy war) and the other is shihada (martyrdom).

Because we are ready to fight and ready to kill and be killed, the final victory will be ours. The reason is that the Western countries don’t want war, they are not ready to make a sacrifice, they want to have their good life. That is the reason that the final victory will be ours. So it very much depends now on the policy of the Western countries as to how to confront Iran and how to confront this kind of ideology.

I think the West can defeat the Iranian regime if it acts very decisively and united. The Iranians are very afraid of the U.S. military, especially U.S. marines power. If the Americans put a real serious and direct threat on Iran to create this impression that they are going to attack, and if they bring in sanctions against Iran, and if the important powers cooperate and implement the sanctions against Iran, and if the West helps the 60 to 70 percent of Iranians who aren’t happy with their current rulers, the regime will be changed. I am not saying this will lead to democracy, that’s not so easy, but it can lead to a regime in Iran that will think about the interests of the people and not export Islamic revolution or support terror organizations.

 

FIRST IRANIAN SIGNS DEAL WITH AN NBA TEAM

And finally, on a lighter note, Hamed Ehadadi has signed to play with the NBA’s Memphis Grizzlies, making him the first Iranian to earn a slot in the world’s top basketball league.

The 23-year-old center shined with Iran’s national basketball team at this month’s Beijing Olympics, averaging 16.5 points and 10 rebounds a game, making him the only player in the tournament to average a “double double.”

The 7’2”, 254-pound Ehadadi made headlines off the court last month when he was photographed embracing Russian national team coach David Blatt after Iran lost to Russia at the Beijing Olympics. Boston-born Blatt has played at and coached several Israeli teams since the 1980s.

-- Tom Gross


Top Iranian mullah compares women to donkeys (& a note on Sarah Palin)

September 02, 2008

* This dispatch concerns Iran. For space reasons it is divided in two. This part deals with human rights; the second part concerns military and security issues, and is titled Ahmadinejad: Zionists behind South Ossetia, Abkhazia conflict (& 63% of Americans support Israeli strike on Iran).

 

CONTENTS

1. Additional note on Sarah Palin
2. Most people have not properly thought through the realities of a nuclear Iran
3. “As low as anything America has ever witnessed in a presidential campaign”
4. Iranian mullah compares women to donkeys (Western feminists silent)
5. Photos of the day
6. Ahmadinejad will have N.Y. speaking engagement “like the one last year at Columbia”
7. Iran continues its surge of youth hangings
8. Australian and Canadian unions protest floggings, executions of workers (European trade unions silent)
9. Iranian journalist executed (Western journalists silent)
10. Who are the Balochis?
11. BBC Persian TV sacks journalists who criticize the regime
12. “Don’t discount Palin’s foreign-policy credentials”


ADDITIONAL NOTE ON SARAH PALIN

I would like to thank Ha’aretz for pointing out in their main news report about John McCain’s choice of running mate, that I was one of the few political commentators to predict as early as July that McCain would pick Sarah Palin. Last paragraph here (Hebrew edition only).

***

Those of you who wish to read my short article for the National Review (titled “Don’t discount Palin’s foreign-policy credentials”) published just hours after her selection on Friday, can do so at the foot of this dispatch.

The article was widely picked up over the weekend. For example, it was reproduced in full on the website of America’s CBS television network. And it was commented on and sometimes criticized in various prominent blogs, such as that of Andrew Sullivan, a subscriber to this email list.

 

MOST PEOPLE HAVE NOT PROPERLY THOUGHT THROUGH THE REALITIES OF A NUCLEAR IRAN

I realize, of course, that not everyone on this list will agree with my article on Palin. The article concerns the issue of Iran’s rapidly advancing pursuit of nuclear weapons, which I believe is the most pressing issue in the world today.

As I have mentioned before, seeing the weakness of the so-called international community towards Iran’s nuclear program, at least seven other Middle East countries have already begun nascent nuclear programs of their own.

Once nuclear weapons spread into the Middle East and beyond, there is no turning back. No country in the world will have the power to police nukes in the hands of so many unstable countries with unreliable military structures often infiltrated by radical Islamists, some of whom would welcome the “martyrdom” of their own populations, since they genuinely believe in what they consider to be the next world, not in this one.

BIDEN AND IRAN

Meanwhile, while most American politicians were yesterday rallying together to deal with Hurricane Gustav, Obama’s running mate Joe Biden was again attacking John McCain for his tough stance against Iran.

And Israel’s Army Radio and Ha’aretz newspaper reported yesterday that Biden told Israeli officials in closed conversations three years ago that he was firmly opposed to an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities and that “Israel would likely have to come to terms with a nuclear Iran.” (Biden’s spokesman has today denied the report but Israeli officials say it is accurate.)

ALASKAN HELP FOR ISRAEL

Some senior Jewish Democrats who have never met Palin have been telling reporters that she is anti-Israel, and some even alleged she is anti-Semitic. For example, Democratic Congressman Robert Wexler of Florida said McCain’s choice of Palin was an “affront to all Jewish Americans.” This is ridiculous. Palin enjoys very good relations with Alaska’s Jewish community and keeps an Israeli flag in her office (along with flags of others U.S. allies).

She also recently passed a resolution noting Alaska’s special connection to Israel dating back to Alaska Airlines’ participation in the rescue of 40,000 Yemenite Jews when it airlifted them from Yemen to Tel Aviv during 1948 and 1949.

 

“AS LOW AS ANYTHING AMERICA HAS EVER WITNESSED IN A PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN”

Despite yesterday’s media frenzy concerning Sarah Palin’s family, I would stand by my assessment that Palin was a wise pick by McCain.

From the moment she was chosen, the smears from some on the far left were as deplorable as anything one is likely to find on a ku klux klan website. The attacks and lies about her children, particularly about her Down’s syndrome infant, are as low as anything America has ever witnessed in a presidential campaign and it is to my profound disappointment that they have been repeated on the websites of supposedly respectable newspapers like The Guardian.

Barack Obama has repeatedly pleaded with his supporters over the last few days to stop the vicious personal and misogynistic attacks that began on Sarah Palin and her children from almost the moment she was nominated.

A senior aide to Obama told Reuters: “The despicable rumors that have been spread by liberal blogs, some even with Barack Obama’s name in them, is a real anchor around the Democratic ticket, pulling them down in the mud in a way that certainly juxtaposes themselves against their campaign of change.”

BREAST PUMP? GO-GO BOOTS?

Meanwhile “feminists” such as Maureen Dowd, star columnist at The New York Times, has revealed herself (unsurprisingly) not to actually care about the advancement of women, if those women, like Sarah Palin, are ordinary people. Instead Dowd has published one of the most snobby, sexist columns I have ever seen in The New York Times (with comments about Palin’s alleged “breast pump,” “go-go boots,” hairstyle, the fact she goes shopping, the fact she didn’t go to an Ivy college, and so on.) It seems that Dowd and her colleagues are only interested in promoting elitist, moneyed, privileged women like themselves.

Such attacks come as little surprise given the track record of many who wrongly regard themselves as liberals for not caring about women and other minority rights if it doesn’t suit them, as indicated by their silence over the events in Iran documented below and on previous dispatches on this website.

WILL SHE ONE DAY BE VOTED AMERICA’S FIRST FEMALE PRESIDENT DESPITE THE MEDIA ONSLAUGHT?

I too disagree with Palin’s views on abortion but that doesn’t excuse brutal, sexist attacks on Palin, and the way the mainstream media, particularly in Europe are now prominently printing every single rumor and innuendo about Palin and even about Palin’s daughter’s boyfriend, while all but ignoring some very real scandals about Joe Biden’s son and brother, for example, or deliberately censoring for months the fact that John Edwards fathered a baby with a former campaign employee during his campaign last year.

Hardly any of these sexist critics bother to mention that due to her highly successful policies, she currently enjoys an approval rating of between 80 and 90 percent in Alaska from voters of all parties, an approval rating unparalleled by almost any other politician in America.

Not all feminists share Dowd’s condescending attitude, however. Camille Paglia, the cultural critic, said on Friday: “We may be seeing the first woman president. As a Democrat, I am reeling. That was the best political speech I have ever seen delivered by an American woman politician.”

-- Tom Gross

***

 

[Notes below on Iran by Tom Gross]

IRANIAN MULLAH COMPARES WOMEN TO DONKEYS

Hojjat al-Eslam Ali Borhan, a prominent prayer leader in Mahriz, announced on Friday that the authorities would no longer tolerate the presence of any woman dressed in a manteau (a long overcoat traditionally worn by women in Iran) and all women must wear the chador (a full-length head-to-toe garment without any hand openings or closures).

He said “some people may get used to the presence of naked donkeys without getting sexually excited, but if anyone saw women dressed in anything other than the chador, this would instigate immorality.” (In Persian, here.)

He also ruled that no cinema should ever open in Mahriz because this “would serve as a den of immorality, since the dark of the cinema could provide opportunity to exchange telephone numbers between young men and women.”

 

PHOTOS OF THE DAY

Here are some photos from Iran’s official Fars News Agency:

* Eating “sheep head soup” in Iran in a pre-Ramadan meal over the weekend.

* Children celebrating the second anniversary of Hizbullah’s “victory” over the Zionist entity, in Tehran’s “Palestine Square.”

* Those who are so against the West use modern western instruments to determine the start of Ramadan yesterday. Here, here, and here.

 

AHMADINEJAD WILL HAVE NY SPEAKING ENGAGEMENT “LIKE THE ONE LAST YEAR AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY”

The director of the Iranian president’s office, Sheikh al-Eslami, has announced that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will have a speaking engagement “like the one last year at Columbia University” during his next visit to New York. He is expected to visit New York again later this month for the UN General Assembly. (In Persian here.)

I have never understood why the UN General Assembly commands such respect among many Western media, human rights groups and academia since a majority of the leaders attending it are dictators or despots.

 

IRAN CONTINUES ITS SURGE OF YOUTH HANGINGS

Iran, the world’s most prolific executioner after China, last week hanged another four men and a woman. This brings to 232 the number of known executions in Iran so far this year, compared to 317 executions in all of 2007.

Of particular concern is the number of youths facing execution for crimes they committed as children. There are at least 132 juvenile offenders on death row.

Iran leads the world in executing juvenile offenders, ahead of China, a much more populous country. Almost no other country in the world executes individuals for crimes committed when they were under 18 years old.

A day after the European Union condemned the August 19 execution of Reza Hejazi for a murder he committed when he was 15, another child offender was hanged in Iran.

 

AUSTRALIAN AND CANADIAN UNIONS PROTEST FLOGGINGS AND EXECUTIONS

In the last two weeks trade unions in both Australia and Canada have lodged protests against the spate of lashings, floggings and death sentences recently meted out by the Iranian regime to workers and trade unionists there.

But why the virtual silence from the so-called “human rights” organizations in Europe and North America? Are they too busy staging pro-Hamas publicity stunts and boat trips?

Meanwhile, Iranians in Sweden, and in the German cities of Cologne and Berlin, last month held vigils to commemorate the mass killings of political prisoners in Iran in 1988.

And prisoners from Iran’s brutally persecuted Kurdish minority have begun a hunger strike against the death penalties, torture and appalling conditions that Kurdish political prisoners are subjected to in Iranian jails. (In English here.)

 

IRANIAN JOURNALIST EXECUTED

Yaghoub Mehrnahad, a 28 year-old journalist, who was also a student in Iran’s Sistan and Baluchestan province, has been executed.

His “crime” occurred in April 2007, when he criticized the regime during a debate at a conference called “Youths question, Officials reply” in Zahedan, the capital of Baluchestan. Yaghoub was arrested at the debate and then condemned to death.

He had criticized the regime for refusing to help women and children suffering from AIDS.

During Yaghoub’s trial neither he, nor his family, nor his lawyer, nor a jury were present. His family last saw him in Zahedan prison in December saying he showed “obvious signs of torture.”

Where are the protests from Western journalists’ associations, student groups and AIDS activists?

 

WHO ARE THE BALOCHIS?

Yaghoub was a member of the Balochi minority, one of many repressed minorities throughout Iran (not that most Western newspaper editors and “human rights” groups seem to care).

There has been a sharp increase in the persecution of the Balochis by the Iranian regime over the past few months. Balochis, most of who belong to the Hanafi sect of Sunni Islam, are a minority in three countries, and have been oppressed for generations.

The Balochis are to Pakistan, Iran and Afghanistan what the Kurds are to Turkey, Syria and Iran, that is, a people spilt by the borders of newly created twentieth century states in the, trying to maintain their identity.

About six million Balochis live in Pakistan, three million in Iran and one million in Afghanistan.

In other words there are about twice as many Balochis as Palestinians but I doubt that most Western human rights activists have ever heard of them.

 

BBC PERSIAN TV SACKS JOURNALISTS WHO CRITICIZE THE MULLAHS

The Tabnak News Agency reveals that the BBC’s new Persian Television Service (which is run and funded by the British Foreign Office and the state-funded BBC) has devised a strategy to get rid of critical journalists to preserve its license to operate in Iran.

Perhaps the British members of parliament from all three main British political parties who subscribe to this email list will take up this matter with the BBC Director-General?

 

PALIN, BIDEN AND IRAN

Don’t discount Palin’s foreign-policy credentials
By Tom Gross
The National Review
August 30, 2008 10:36 AM

Critics are already trying to damn Sarah Palin for her perceived lack of foreign-policy experience, but what they are not allowing for is something more important – that she has the right basic attitudes and sense of priorities. If one looks at her impressive record during 13 years of elected office (she enjoys over 80 percent approval ratings in Alaska from voters of all parties), one can see that she understands that aggression has to be resisted and commitments have to be honored.

Certainly there is every sign that she will be better for at least one of America’s closest friends and allies, Israel, than Joe Biden.

It is true that Biden talks of his support for Israel in principle, but the reality is that he has done his utmost to thwart keeping the possibility of a military option open to stop Iran acquiring nuclear weapons. As a result he was even praised recently on the Iranian regime’s official propaganda arm, Press TV.

It is no accident that Biden was dubbed “Tehran’s favorite senator” in an article in The Washington Post last week.

By contrast, the very first reference to foreign policy that Palin made in her acceptance speech after being chosen as John McCain’s vice-presidential candidate Friday was that Iran must be stopped from getting nuclear weapons. She mentioned this even before she mentioned the issues of Iraq and Russia.

Palin has a record for integrity and for getting the job done matched by very few politicians, as shown by her success in tackling the corrupt Republican-party establishment in Alaska, and her highly effective economic program there.

The U.S. and Israel can have every confidence that, like McCain, she is a doer who means what she says – not someone like Joe Biden who may come out with fine sentiments but seems unwilling to get to grips with fundamental problems posed by Iran and Syria.

(Tom Gross is a former Mideast correspondent for London’s Sunday Telegraph.)