* Top EU official today: Hamas is a terrorist movement and is fully responsible for the Gaza war
* Former New York Times reporter Youssef M. Ibrahim: “Dear Palestinian Arab brethren: The war with Israel is over. You have lost. Why not let a new future begin?”
* The Irish Independent: “Anyone who devotes only a cursory glance at the news, both print and television, would be forgiven for thinking that, out of spite, might and malice, Israel has decided to destroy the Palestinian people. The problem with that conclusion – and it’s not something you’re going to learn from the BBC and most other outlets – is that, contrary to the currently popular belief, Israel is actually acting with a ridiculous degree of restraint.”
* Benjamin Netanyahu: “The charge that Israel has used disproportionate force is baseless. Does proportionality demand that Israel fire 6,000 rockets indiscriminately back at Gaza? Does it demand an equal number of casualties on both sides? Using that logic, one would conclude that the United States employed disproportionate force against the Germans because 20 times as many Germans as Americans died in World War II.
“In that same war, Britain responded to the firing of thousands of rockets on its population with the wholesale bombing of German cities. Israel’s measured response to rocket fire on its cities has come in the form of surgical strikes. To further root out Hamas terrorists in a way that minimizes Palestinian civilian casualties, Israel’s army engaged in a ground operation that placed its soldiers in great peril. Carpet-bombing of Palestinian cities is not an option that any Israeli leader will entertain.”
CONTENTS
1. Top EU official: Hamas fully responsible for Gaza war
2. Yasser Abed Rabbo: Hamas is establishing an “emirate of darkness” in the Gaza Strip
3. “Dear Palestinian Arab brethren…”
4. “Israel is actually acting with a ridiculous degree of restraint”
5. The Gaza withdrawal was a “disaster” for Israel
6. “Imagine if Britain had deliberately refused to hit sites that housed top German commanders”
7. “The War with Israel is over – and they won” (By Youssef Ibrahim, Jan. 11, 2009)
8. “Why the Israeli people have finally had enough” (By Ian O’Doherty, Irish Independent, Jan. 5, 2009)
9. “Time for a Gaza Apology” (By Michael Freund, Jerusalem Post, Jan. 21, 2009)
10. “Refusing to win” (By Daniel Doron, Jerusalem Post, Jan. 14, 2009)
TOP EU OFFICIAL: HAMAS RESPONSIBLE FOR GAZA WAR
[Note by Tom Gross]
I attach four further articles on this month’s “mini-war” between Israel and Hamas, with extracts first for those who don’t have time to read them in full.
The first part of this dispatch (“The moral chasm that separates Jews from their enemies”) can be read here.
Meanwhile, in unusually strong language for the European Union, a top EU official said today that Hamas bears “overwhelming responsibility for the war in Gaza.” He made the remarks as he toured the Gaza Strip, calling the group “a terrorist movement” who had “held Palestinians hostage as human shields.”
“I intentionally say this here – Hamas is a terrorist movement and it has to be denounced as such,” EU Aid Commissioner Louis Michel said as he visited the town of Jabalya in northern Gaza.
“Public opinion is fed up to see that we are paying over and over again – be it the [European] commission, the member states or the major donors – for infrastructure that will be systematically destroyed,” he said.
“When you, Hamas, kill innocents, it is not resistance. It is terrorism.”
A Hamas official, Mushir al-Masri, was quoted by Reuters as saying his group was “shocked” at Michel’s comments.
For years, this email list/website has urged the EU to make aid to Palestinians conditional on peaceful intentions and good governance.
YASSER ABED RABBO: HAMAS IS ESTABLISHING AN “EMIRATE OF DARKNESS” IN THE GAZA STRIP
While other backers of Hamas in the international community and international media are falsely suggesting that Israel’s Gaza operation was somehow uniquely bad, many experts believe Israel was in fact much too weak. (Which other army in history has called a three hour break every day in consideration of the other side’s population, allowing enemy fighters to regroup?)
Meanwhile, a leading aide to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas has said Israel made a “big mistake” by ending its Gaza operation “too early” without overthrowing the Hamas regime there. “The fact that Hamas is still in power is bad for everyone,” he said.
And, separately, Yasser Abed Rabbo, a senior PLO official closely associated with Abbas, on Thursday launched a scathing attack on Hamas, accusing it of seeking to establish an “emirate of darkness” in the Gaza Strip.
***
I would like to remind readers that I don’t necessarily agree with all the points in the articles included in these dispatches. They are included to draw attention to information and arguments that don’t generally get a fair hearing in the mainstream international media.
-- Tom Gross
“DEAR PALESTINIAN ARAB BRETHREN…”
The first article below is by Youssef M. Ibrahim, a former New York Times Middle East correspondent and Wall Street Journal energy editor for 25 years. He is now a freelance writer based in New York City and Dubai in the United Arab Emirates.
This article was originally written in 2006 for the (now defunct) New York Sun, but Ibrahim reissued the article again this month. (Needless to say The New York Times wouldn’t publish it.)
He writes:
Dear Palestinian Arab brethren: The war with Israel is over. You have lost. Surrender and negotiate to secure a future for your children. We, your Arab brothers, may say until we are blue in the face that we stand by you, but the wise among you and most of us know that we are moving on, away from the tired old idea of the Palestinian Arab cause and the “eternal struggle” with Israel. Dear friends, you and your leaders have wasted three generations trying to fight for Palestine, but the truth is the Palestine you could have had in 1948 is much bigger than the one you could have had in 1967, which in turn is much bigger than what you may have to settle for now or in another 10 years.
Struggle means less land and more misery and utter loneliness... You hold keys, which you drag out for television interviews, to houses that do not exist or are inhabited by Israelis who have no intention of leaving Jaffa, Haifa, Tel Aviv, or West Jerusalem. You shoot old guns at modern Israeli tanks and American-made fighter jets, doing virtually no harm to Israel while bringing the wrath of its mighty army down upon you. You fire ridiculously inept Kassam rockets that cause little destruction and delude yourselves into thinking this is a war of liberation.
Your government, your social institutions, your schools, and your economy are all in ruins. Your young people are growing up illiterate, ill, and bent on rites of death and suicide, while you, in effect, are living on the kindness of foreigners, including America and the United Nations. Every day your officials must beg for your daily bread, dependent on relief trucks that carry food and medicine into the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, while your criminal Muslim fundamentalist Hamas government continues to fan the flames of a war it can neither fight nor hope to win.
… Those of us who have oil money are busy accumulating wealth and building housing, luxury developments, state-of-the-art universities and schools, and new highways and byways. Those of us who share borders with Israel, such as Egypt and Jordan, have signed a peace treaty with it and are not going to war for you any time soon. Those of us who are far away, in places like North Africa and Iraq, frankly could not care less about what happens to you…
The war is over. Why not let a new future begin?
“ISRAEL IS ACTUALLY ACTING WITH A RIDICULOUS DEGREE OF RESTRAINT”
In the second article below, writing in The Irish Independent (not to be confused with the British paper of a similar name), Ian O’Doherty writes:
So, it’s genocide now, is it? Or is it actually another holocaust, something which one typically restrained Palestinian analyst described as “worse than Hitler’s war against the Jews”? Are we watching the ethnic cleansing of an entire people? Are we witnessing the deliberate eradication of a race?
Well, no actually, we’re not.
Yet the conventional dinner party wisdom which we’ve had to put up with in the media, both here in Ireland and generally across Britain, is that somehow Israel is the aggressor in the rapidly worsening situation in Gaza.
… Anyone who devotes only a cursory glance at the news, both print and television, would be forgiven for thinking that, out of spite, might and malice, Israel has decided to destroy the Palestinian people.
The problem with that conclusion – and it’s not something you’re going to learn from the BBC and most other outlets - is that, contrary to the currently popular belief, Israel is actually acting with a ridiculous degree of restraint.
Over the last couple of years, thousands of rockets have been landing on Israeli soil and, finally, they have had enough.
But behind that statistic there is a human dimension which tends to be rather ignored.
I know many people in the southern Israeli town of Sderot and what is remarkable about their stories is not the number or make of rockets which have fallen on them on a daily basis for years, but the psychological carnage this wreaked upon them.
One woman freely admitted to me that she hasn’t had a proper night’s sleep in more than two years as she and her family now basically live in their bomb shelter and it’s hard to tell who she hates more – the Muslim terrorists of Hamas or the Israeli government which she thinks has abandoned them.
It’s a common feeling amongst residents of southern Israeli towns who have been the silent -victims of a long campaign of violence, intimidation and murder carried out by Hamas. And now, finally, that the Israelis have said that enough is enough, they are somehow meant to be the aggressors? …
THE GAZA WITHDRAWAL WAS A “DISASTER” FOR ISRAEL
In the third article below, Jerusalem Post columnist Michael Freund argues that “for all the coverage of events in southern Israel, both the media and Israel’s leadership have meticulously avoided any mention of the August 2005 Gaza pullout, despite the fact that it gave rise to the current mess in which we find ourselves.”
“This is hardly surprising, because it would require them to admit they were wrong in backing that ill-fated move.”
“It is time for a Gaza apology,” he says, “and a national admission of guilt. All those who had a hand in the disengagement should apologize to the people of Israel, the residents of Sderot and the rest of the Negev and especially to those who lived in Gush Katif. Because through their folly, the supporters of withdrawal brought disaster upon this country.”
“To paraphrase Bill Clinton’s 1992 presidential campaign, ‘It was the disengagement, stupid!’”
Michael Freund outlines some of the comments in support of the disengagement that Ariel Sharon, Ehud Olmert and Shimon Peres made at the time.
They dismissed warnings from those such as Col. (res.) Mordechai Yogev who said at the time that “the withdrawal of the IDF from the Gaza Strip will bring numerous large population centers and communities within the range of Kassam rockets and mortar shells.”
“IMAGINE IF BRITAIN HAD DELIBERATELY REFUSED TO HIT SITES THAT HOUSED TOP GERMAN COMMANDERS”
In the fourth and final article below, Daniel Doron (who like Michael Freund is a subscriber to this email list) writes:
Imagine that at the outbreak of World War II RAF bombers had managed to bomb Berlin by surprise and inflict enormous material damage, but had deliberately refused to hit sites that housed top Nazi brass. Imagine that only after several days of bombing, the British finally attacked the German headquarters, after warning of the impending attack.
How would the British public have reacted?
How would it have reacted if its government willfully missed the chance to kill many Nazi leaders? Would it have accepted the explanation that every leader can be replaced, that one must warn enemy leaders of a planned attack to prevent hitting innocent neighbors? Wouldn’t the killing of many Nazi leaders shorten the war, it would probably ask. Is it not moral to save hundreds of thousands of lives and prevent the terrible suffering of a prolonged war even if this requires hurting some innocent civilians?
Such questions were not raised in Israel. Only after three days of bombing did the IAF finally bomb Hamas headquarters, and it took 16 days before it bombed the residence of Hamas’s top commander (and even then it gave him a warning so his wives and children could first leave the house).
… Against all historical evidence, and against common sense, most leaders, egged on by the media, have sold themselves on the conception that “there are no wars in existence anymore that can be won like the wars of yore” (as stated by a headline to a special Ma’ariv supplement “Not By Force” preaching against seeking victory); in other words that “terror cannot be vanquished by force.”
This is nonsense, of course. Almost every terrorist movement was vanquished by force, from the 11th century Assassins to the 1936 Arab Revolt, from the post World War II communist insurrections in Greece or Malaya to terrors groups in Italy, Germany, Japan, etc…
FULL ARTICLES
THE WAR WITH ISRAEL IS OVER – AND THEY WON
The War with Israel is over – and they won
By Youssef Ibrahim
January 11, 2009
[An original version of this article appeared in The New York Sun in 2006]
To my Arab brothers:
Now let’s finally move forward with Israel entering its third week of an incursion into the same Gaza Strip it voluntarily evacuated a few years ago, a sense of reality among Arabs is spreading through commentary by Arab pundits, letters to the editor, and political talk shows on Arabic-language TV networks. The new views are stunning both in their maturity and in their realism. The best way I can think of to convey them is in the form of a letter to the Palestinian Arabs from their Arab friends:
Dear Palestinian Arab brethren: The war with Israel is over. You have lost. Surrender and negotiate to secure a future for your children. We, your Arab brothers, may say until we are blue in the face that we stand by you, but the wise among you and most of us know that we are moving on, away from the tired old idea of the Palestinian Arab cause and the “eternal struggle” with Israel. Dear friends, you and your leaders have wasted three generations trying to fight for Palestine, but the truth is the Palestine you could have had in 1948 is much bigger than the one you could have had in 1967, which in turn is much bigger than what you may have to settle for now or in another 10 years.
Struggle means less land and more misery and utter loneliness. At the moment, brothers, you would be lucky to secure a semblance of a state in that Gaza Strip into which you have all crowded, and a small part of the West Bank of the Jordan. It isn’t going to get better. Time is running out even for this much land, so here are some facts, figures, and sound advice, friends.
You hold keys, which you drag out for television interviews, to houses that do not exist or are inhabited by Israelis who have no intention of leaving Jaffa, Haifa , Tel Aviv, or West Jerusalem. You shoot old guns at modern Israeli tanks and American-made fighter jets, doing virtually no harm to Israel while bringing the wrath of its mighty army down upon you. You fire ridiculously inept Kassam rockets that cause little destruction and delude yourselves into thinking this is a war of liberation.
Your government, your social institutions, your schools, and your economy are all in ruins. Your young people are growing up illiterate, ill, and bent on rites of death and suicide, while you, in effect, are living on the kindness of foreigners, including America and the United Nations. Every day your officials must beg for your daily bread, dependent on relief trucks that carry food and medicine into the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, while your criminal Muslim fundamentalist Hamas government continues to fan the flames of a war it can neither fight nor hope to win.
In other words, brothers, you are down, out, and alone in a burnt-out landscape that is shrinking by the day. What kind of struggle is this? Is it worth waging at all? More important, what kind of miserable future does it portend for your children, the fourth or fifth generation of the Arab world’s have-nots? We, your Arab brothers, have moved on.
Those of us who have oil money are busy accumulating wealth and building housing, luxury developments, state-of-the-art universities and schools, and new highways and byways. Those of us who share borders with Israel, such as Egypt and Jordan, have signed a peace treaty with it and are not going to war for you any time soon. Those of us who are far away, in places like North Africa and Iraq, frankly could not care less about what happens to you.
Only Syria continues to feed your fantasies that someday it will join you in liberating Palestine , even though a huge chunk of its territory, the entire Golan Heights, was taken by Israel in 1967 and annexed. The Syrians, my friends, will gladly fight down to the last Palestinian Arab. Before you got stuck with this Hamas crowd, another cheating, conniving, leader of yours, Yasser Arafat, sold you a rotten bill of goods – more pain, greater corruption, and millions stolen by his relatives - while your children played in the sewers of Gaza .
The war is over. Why not let a new future begin?
WHY THE ISRAELI PEOPLE HAVE FINALLY HAD ENOUGH
Why the Israeli people have finally had enough
The Irish Independent
By Ian O’Doherty
January 5, 2009
www.independent.ie/opinion/columnists/ian-odoherty/why-the-israeli-people-have-finally-had-enough-1592022.html
So, it’s genocide now, is it? Or is it actually another holocaust, something which one typically restrained Palestinian analyst described as “worse than Hitler’s war against the Jews”? Are we watching the ethnic cleansing of an entire people? Are we witnessing the deliberate eradication of a race?
Well, no actually, we’re not.
Yet the conventional dinner party wisdom which we’ve had to put up with in the media, both here in Ireland and generally across Britain, is that somehow Israel is the aggressor in the rapidly worsening situation in Gaza.
Footage of air strikes with the ensuing photogenic explosions and dramatic plumes of smoke, quickly followed by clips of collapsed buildings and enraged mourners, makes far better copy than actually looking at the reasons why Israel has done what it’s done.
Anyone who devotes only a cursory glance at the news, both print and television, would be forgiven for thinking that, out of spite, might and malice, Israel has decided to destroy the Palestinian people.
The problem with that conclusion – and it’s not something you’re going to learn from the BBC and most other outlets – is that, contrary to the currently popular belief, Israel is actually acting with a ridiculous degree of restraint.
Over the last couple of years, thousands of rockets have been landing on Israeli soil and, finally, they have had enough.
But behind that statistic there is a human dimension which tends to be rather ignored.
I know many people in the southern Israeli town of Sderot and what is remarkable about their stories is not the number or make of rockets which have fallen on them on a daily basis for years, but the psychological carnage this wreaked upon them.
One woman freely admitted to me that she hasn’t had a proper night’s sleep in more than two years as she and her family now basically live in their bomb shelter and it’s hard to tell who she hates more – the Muslim terrorists of Hamas or the Israeli government which she thinks has abandoned them.
It’s a common feeling amongst residents of southern Israeli towns who have been the silent victims of a long campaign of violence, intimidation and murder carried out by Hamas. And now, finally, that the Israelis have said that enough is enough, they are somehow meant to be the aggressors?
There are people of good conscience on both sides of this argument, but one of the main problems in this debate lies in the cowardly tendency of the Western media to apply equivalence to both sides.
Thus, Hamas is seen to be as legitimate a government as the Israelis, and its rocket attacks across the border from Gaza are seen as being part of a yet another, intractable, interminable Middle Eastern dispute.
There’s just one problem with that approach – it’s completely wrong.
Hamas is a fundamentalist Islamic organisation intent on the eradication of the state of Israel and all its citizens; a violent fascist regime that allows honour killings and the execution of homosexuals to continue in its sphere of influence. Bankrolled by Iran, it manages to make even Hezbollah look like a moderate organisation.
But Hamas is clever.
As a friend of mine from Sderot pointed out, one of its favourite tactics is to launch Qassams from Palestinian schoolyards – while the schools are still in session.
Hamas does this, you see, knowing that the IDF can’t immediately strike back (they can vector a rocket launch site within 90 seconds) because the last thing the Israelis need is footage of a devastated Palestinian school with dead kids.
And, over the last week, we have seen carefully manipulated footage of dead civilians, with the fact that they were effectively used as human shields conveniently ignored. When Israel pulled out of Gaza – ironically, the last battalion of IDF troops to leave Gaza contained some people from Sderot – they were acceding to international and internal pressure. The doves on the Left said it was to prove to Palestinians that they wanted to give Palestinians independence, the hawks on the Right – and there are some truly scary right-wingers in Israel, even as ardent a supporter of the country as I am will freely admit that – prophesied that it would lead to carnage.
And, lo and behold, virtually as soon as the last jeep left Gaza the rockets started. And then the blockade began, and the whole damn mess started all over again.
But there’s a bigger picture here, something which Israelis have been trying to broadcast to the world, but which, thanks to their spectacular inability to accurately and sympathetically portray their point of view, has not been properly transmitted. It’s this – Israel is the front line of the war between democracy and Islamic fascism.
Would you rather live in a society with a free press, equal rights for women – and anyone who knows an Israeli woman will know that they’re not easily suppressed, anyway – equal rights for gay people and a proud and stubborn belief in the right of the individual to lead their life in the way that they see fit or would you rather exist in a society where women who dare to speak their mind are executed, where gay people are not just shunned but murdered and where having a dissenting thought marks you out for death?
The civilian deaths in Gaza are to be mourned, and anyone who says otherwise is reprehensible. But in a sick and twisted irony, they are mourned more by Israelis than by Hamas, who know that every dead Palestinian kid is worth another piece of propaganda.
Here in the West, where we share the same values as Israel, we need to start standing shoulder with this tiny oasis of democracy in a vast desert of savagery.
To do otherwise is moral cowardice of the most repugnant kind.
TIME FOR A GAZA APOLOGY
Time for a Gaza Apology
By Michael Freund
The Jerusalem Post
January 21, 2009
For all its extensive, wall-to-wall coverage of the situation in the South over the past month, there is one key issue that the country’s leadership and media have studiously and carefully avoided mentioning of late.
Despite finding time to examine a wide range of subjects, from the intricacies of intra-Hamas politics to the technical differences between Kassam and Grad rockets, pundits and politicians alike have proven incapable of acknowledging the underlying cause behind the present disarray.
Indeed, if you listened carefully, and followed the news in recent weeks, you may have noticed that hardly anything was said about the colossal strategic blunder which enabled Hamas to strike terror in the streets of Ashkelon and Beersheba.
Yes, you guessed correctly. To paraphrase Bill Clinton’s 1992 presidential campaign, “It was the disengagement, stupid!”
Of course, this hardly comes as a surprise. After all, it would require something of our politicians and their guard dogs in the press which they seem constitutionally incapable of doing: admitting they were wrong.
Yet that is precisely what they were when they supported the Sharon government’s misguided August 2005 retreat: dead wrong, and profoundly so.
It was their blunder, their bluster and their blindness, which got us into this mess, and which brought the country an unprecedented wave of airborne Palestinian projectiles and terror. All those who backed the pullout then, and adamantly defended it to the public, clearly now owe the rest of us a whopper of an apology.
Which is exactly why they are so manifestly silent on the subject.
BUT THE facts are too compelling to ignore, and they readily speak for themselves. Let’s do a quick rewind and you’ll see why.
Prior to the ignominious retreat more than three years ago, there were warnings aplenty that it would endanger the South and place hundreds of thousands of people within range of jihadist rockets in Gaza.
Here is just one of many examples. On January 11, 2005, seven months before the pullout, Col. Uzi Buchbinder, head of civil defense in the IDF’s Home Front Command, told the Knesset Interior Committee that the disengagement plan, if implemented, would expose 46 towns and cities in the Negev to Kassam rocket fire.
At the same hearing, Col. (res.) Mordechai Yogev presented a report to our parliamentarians, cautioning that “the withdrawal of the IDF from the Gaza Strip and northern Samaria will bring numerous large population centers and communities within the range of Kassam rockets and mortar shells.” (Ha’aretz, January 12, 2005)
And that, of course, is precisely what occurred.
But no one wanted to listen, no one wished to hear, even as politicians and protesters on the Right railed against the disengagement, accurately predicting the disaster that would ensue.
Instead, the leaders of the country mocked the plan’s opponents and hurled invective and abuse their way.
After more than 100,000 people rallied outside the Knesset on January 29, 2005 against the government’s plan, vice prime minister Shimon Peres ridiculed the gathering, labeling it a “rally of shlemazels.” (Jerusalem Post, February 1, 2005)
As it turns out, of course, the real shlemazels are not those who warned about the dangers of retreat, but those who stubbornly ignored them.
IN THIS context it is worth recalling that one of those who led the charge in favor of the expulsion of Gaza’s Jews was none other than our very own Ehud Olmert, who at the time served as Ariel Sharon’s vice premier.
On June 9, 2005, Olmert insisted in remarks to an American Jewish audience that the disengagement “will bring more security, greater safety, much more prosperity and a lot of joy for all the people that live in the Middle East.” Continuing with his flight of fantasy, Olmert went on to say that “we are confident that this disengagement will be successful, and that it will then lead to the beginning of a new pattern of relations between us and the Palestinian Authority.”
Well, it certainly has lead to a “new pattern of relations,” as the Palestinian leadership was forced to flee to Ramallah after Hamas quickly seized control over Gaza. But that, of course, is not quite what Olmert and his colleagues had in mind.
On August 15, 2005, the day of the pullout itself, Sharon addressed the nation and assured us that “this plan is good for Israel in any future scenario.” Needless to say, that has proven to be patently untrue. And while Sharon is no longer in any condition to be offering regrets, there are plenty of people out there in positions of power who darn well should.
It is time for a Gaza apology and a national admission of guilt. All those who had a hand in the disengagement should apologize to the people of Israel, the residents of Sderot and the rest of the Negev and especially to those who lived in Gush Katif.
Through their folly, the supporters of withdrawal brought disaster upon this country. They destroyed the lives of thousands of Gaza’s Jews, and put nearly a million Israelis within the cross-hairs of Hamas.
Unless Israel and its leaders have the courage to come to terms with their error, the danger of making additional such blunders will continue to accompany us well into the future.
Mistakes, wrote the author James Joyce, are portals of discovery. They allow us to gain a better glimpse of reality and to move forward. But that can only happen if in fact one is capable of embracing his own failings.
The disengagement, as its name implied, was supposed to disengage Israel from the Palestinians and their violence. But instead, as we have seen, it did just the opposite.
It is about time that its proponents publicly acknowledged as much.
ISRAEL REFUSES TO WIN
Refusing to win
By Daniel Doron
The Jerusalem Post
January 14, 2009
Imagine that at the outbreak of World War II RAF bombers had managed to bomb Berlin by surprise and inflict enormous material damage, but had deliberately refused to hit sites that housed top Nazi brass. Imagine that only after several days of bombing, the British finally attacked the German headquarters, after warning of the impending attack.
How would the British public have reacted?
How would it have reacted if its government willfully missed the chance to kill many Nazi leaders? Would it have accepted the explanation that every leader can be replaced, that one must warn enemy leaders of a planned attack to prevent hitting innocent neighbors? Wouldn’t the killing of many Nazi leaders shorten the war, it would probably ask. Is it not moral to save hundreds of thousands of lives and prevent the terrible suffering of a prolonged war even if this requires hurting some innocent civilians?
Such questions were not raised in Israel. Only after three days of bombing did the IAF finally bomb Hamas headquarters, and it took 16 days before it bombed the residence of Hamas’s top commander. This country did not exploit the surprise it achieved to kill as many top Hamas commanders as possible (just as in the past it has neglected to do so) – even though this would have most likely led to the collapse of its war machine and shortened the war.
Exploiting the surprise of the attack to the fullest would have also made unnecessary the land incursion and the many casualties it involves. Hamas could be destroyed as an effective war machine by simply killing or chasing away, in short order, many of those who operate its war machine. When we forgo such effective action, we are forced to take other, less effective actions, such as massive closures and bombardments and prolonged land incursions. These cause much greater humanitarian damage without securing victory.
SO WHY is our government so reluctant to win? Some claim that politicians become more risk averse on the eve of elections. Others blame sharp internal divisions, confusion and lack of determination that inflict the unholy trinity governing the country. Still others claim that leaders who believe that “peace must be made with enemies” make sure they survive so as to have “partners” for a deal after “teaching them a lesson.” Finally there are those who claim that a crushing victory will be a great embarrassment to our leaders. “If victory was possible,” the public will say, “why did you wait almost eight years before liberating us from Hamas’s terror?”
There is a kernel of truth in these explanations. But every terrible mess in Israel originates in “a conception.” Against all historical evidence, and against common sense, most leaders, egged on by the media, have sold themselves on the conception that “there are no wars in existence anymore that can be won like the wars of yore” (as stated by a headline to a special Ma’ariv supplement “Not By Force” preaching against seeking victory); in other words that “terror cannot be vanquished by force.”
This is nonsense, of course. Almost every terrorist movement was vanquished by force, from the 11th century Assassins to the 1936 Arab Revolt, from the post World War II communist insurrections in Greece or Malaya to terrors groups in Italy, Germany, Japan, etc.
It is also absurd to claim that the IDF, which is supposed to fight several Arab armies simultaneously, cannot vanquish a ragtag guerrilla force of 20,000 fighters lacking armor or airpower. The IDF cannot win only if – like in Lebanon – it fights without a clear plan for victory and under a leadership that does not enable it to win.
The goal of the “plan” annunciated by the Olmert-Barak-Livni government is “to stop the firing of Kassams from Gaza and to stop the smuggling of war materiel into it” (not, God forbid, to win a decisive victory over Hamas). It is based on relying on the Egyptians to stop the huge volume of arms smuggled from the Sinai into Gaza.
IT SEEMS likely that Egypt does not want an Iranian-controlled Hamas, and that it therefore welcomed Israel’s beating Hamas enough to make it seek Egyptian protection again. But Egypt will do all it can to prevent us from finally vanquishing Hamas. Since Egypt has realized that its chances of beating us by direct military confrontation are not great, it has used Hamas for a proxy war of attrition, as the Syrians do with Hizbullah. Egypt hopes to gradually bleed us to death and then get rid of us when an opportunity arises.
This is why Egypt resisted all efforts to make it stop the massive arming of Hamas (does anyone still believe that moving thousands of tons of war material and digging hundreds of smuggling tunnels could take place without Egyptian cooperation?) and this is why it will rehabilitate Hamas once Israel accepts a truce, so that Hamas will be able to resume bleeding us, albeit more cautiously.
Since our war against Hamas – an Iranian proxy – is part of the worldwide war against terror, our failure to vanquish Hamas will also have grave repercussions for the stability of Egypt and Jordan, besides negatively affecting our deterrent capacity and international standing.
The upshot is that if you do not seek victory in war you become the loser, even if the spin doctors convince you, like they did during the Lebanon war, that defeat is actually victory.
* “It would be difficult nearly to the point of impossibility, to find Israeli or other Jews who celebrate the deaths of Palestinian civilians. Jews both within and outside of Israel cringe when they see pictures of dead Palestinian men, women, and children in Gaza. The opposite is the case with the large majority of Palestinians, whether in Palestinian media, schools, mosques or streets”
* If during World War II, Western news media had reported German and Japanese civilian casualties in the same detail and with the same sympathy they report Palestinian civilian casualties, it is doubtful that the Nazis and the Japanese militarists would have lost that war”
* “Israel is more interested in living with world condemnation than in dying with world sympathy”
* “This war was supposed to re-establish Israel’s deterrence. That was supposed to be the lesson. Instead, the lesson is that Israel quits before the rockets do”
CONTENTS
1. Hamas executes former B’tselem field worker
2. Is President Obama a war criminal too?
3. “We decided we’re not going to spend 5 years in Gaza like the 5 years Americans spent in Iraq”
4. “In truth, Israel surrendered to Hamas and its supporters at the UN”
5. “The moral chasm that separates Jews from their enemies”
6. “Israel scored only a tactical victory” (By Bret Stephens, WSJ, Jan. 20, 2009)
7. “Why doesn’t anybody dare say it? Israel didn’t leave, it lost” (By Jonathan Mark, Jan. 22, 2009)
8. “Guess who cares about dead Palestinians? Jews!” (By Dennis Prager, Jan. 13, 2009)
HAMAS EXECUTES FORMER B’TSELEM FIELD WORKER
[Note by Tom Gross]
I attach a number of articles on the outcome of this month’s “mini-war” between Israel and Hamas.
I have split this dispatch in two for space reasons. There are three articles below. I have prepared extracts first for those who don’t have time to read them in full, but it you do have time I would suggest you read the full version.
The first article provides some glimmers of hope for a lasting ceasefire. The other two take a sober look at reality of the kind that it is almost impossible to find in the mainstream media for all their countless hours of broadcasts and hundreds of thousands of words written on Gaza.
First, here are three other items you may have missed in the news:
(1) Hamas has now regained control of all the remaining Gaza arms-smuggling tunnels (i.e. those not destroyed before the international community forced Israel into a premature ceasefire) and as a result, cash-rich Hamas has been moving additional arms into Gaza in recent days, according to Israeli news reports.
The Jerusalem Post adds: “Some of the tunnels were not destroyed – like the one that was filmed by foreign media on Wednesday – out of humanitarian considerations. Several tunnels have pipes that transfer fuel [for rocket launchers] from Sinai to Gaza. The concern in the IDF was that if it bombed such a tunnel, a huge explosion would result – possibly also on the Egyptian side – and there would be many civilian casualties.”
(2) A Palestinian human rights activist who used to work for the Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem has been executed by Hamas on charges of “collaboration” with Israel, Palestinians in Gaza said over the weekend.
They identified the man as Haidar Ghanem, 46, of Rafah. Ghanem, a father of two, had dared to tell Israeli human rights groups about some of the executions and torture perpetrated by Hamas and also by Fatah.
IS PRESIDENT OBAMA A WAR CRIMINAL TOO?
(3) Already under President Barack Obama, who has been in office only five days, the U.S. has reportedly killed a dozen children in airstrikes on the Pakistani side of the Afghan border (airstrikes which also killed Taliban militants) and yet this news has (with only a very few exceptions) been reduced to small paragraphs buried here and there inside newspapers, without any sensational headlines, without any angry editorials or letters, without any gut-wrenching photos. Nor has there been rioting on the streets of European capitals as there has been over Gaza – rioting accompanied in some case by vicious attacks on European Jews. Nor have there been calls to prosecute Barack Obama for “war crimes.”
Some papers didn’t even mention the children’s deaths. The New York Times, for example, just wrote: “Two remote U.S. missile strikes that killed at least 20 people at suspected terrorist hideouts in northwestern Pakistan yesterday offered the first tangible sign of President Obama’s commitment to sustained military pressure on the terrorist groups there, even though Pakistanis broadly oppose such unilateral U.S. actions.”
At the same time, The Times of London – to take one example of a supposedly centrist and moderate paper – has been running huge banner headlines every day this month on its front page and in its news section, such as “Israeli troops reveal ruthless Gaza tactics” and “Israel’s ‘iron fist’ strike at Hamas” and “Israel prepares a devastating ‘third phase’.”
Meanwhile 250,000 Tamil civilians remain trapped, penned in by a Sri Lankan military that shows little regard for their lives in its end game as it crushes Tamil hopes for independence. So far 60,000 have died in the Tamil-Sri Lankan conflict. Do any of those who pontificate about Israel even know what a Tamil is? How many of the dozens of deadly ongoing conflicts in Africa, Asia and elsewhere could they even name?
-- Tom Gross
ARTICLE EXTRACTS
“WE DECIDED WE’RE NOT GOING TO SPEND FIVE YEARS IN GAZA LIKE THE FIVE YEARS AMERICANS SPENT IN IRAQ”
Writing in The Wall Street Journal, Bret Stephens says Israel scored a tactical victory but missed a chance to finish off Hamas.
Speaking to Israeli army officers on the Gaza border, he points to the positive aspects of the war from Israel’s point of view:
They think that Israel has re-established a reputation for invincibility tarnished in the 2006 war with Hizbullah; that they bloodied and humiliated Hamas while taking few casualties; that they called overdue international attention to the tunnels Hamas uses to smuggle its arsenal; and, with the unilateral cease-fire, that they put the onus to end the violence squarely back on Hamas’s shoulders.
… In a wide-ranging interview, a senior military official offers perhaps the most authoritative explanation of his government’s war aims and his interpretation of its effects. “We have no desire to go back into Gaza,” he says. “We decided we’re not going to spend five years [in Gaza] like the five years Americans spent in Iraq.”
On the contrary: Far from seeking regime change in Gaza, the official seems at ease that the Palestinians will remain bifurcated between Hamastan and Fatahland for many years more, the way Germany was divided during the Cold War. The idea is that a Hamas state in Gaza – somehow deterred from mischief – could become a kind of useful negative example to the Palestinians of the West Bank, somewhat in the way East Germany served West Germany as a monument to everything that was wrong with communism.
… Then there is Egypt. For years, it took an ambivalent view of Hamas: partly worried by the threat it poses to its own secular regime, partly delighted by the trouble it causes Israel. Now the Mubarak government at last understands that Hamas is also a strategic threat to Egypt. “An Iranian base can play against Egypt the same way it played against Israel,” says the official. Almost as an aside, he adds that the timing of Israel’s operation in Gaza was dictated in part by the assessment that Hamas was just months away from obtaining longer-range missiles that could reach Cairo as easily as Tel Aviv. Now the Israeli government is prepared to believe that the Egyptians will finally clamp down on the smuggling.
But Bret Stephens concludes by saying that although Israel has scored an impressive tactical victory, it has missed the strategic opportunity to rid itself of the menace on its doorstep. “In the Middle East, opportunities don’t always knock twice,” he says.
“IN TRUTH, ISRAEL SURRENDERED TO HAMAS AND ITS SUPPORTERS AT THE UN”
In the second article below, Jonathan Mark writes:
The first rule of pride is this: When they run you out of town, walk like you’re leading the parade.
I’ll give Israel this: When international pressure got to be too much, Israel left Gaza as if it was Israel’s bright idea, “a unilateral ceasefire.”
In truth, Israel surrendered. It is “surrender” if you leave with Hamas rockets still flying into Israel, and with Gilad Shalit remaining in his private Auschwitz. Imagine how Shalit was tortured these past three weeks. Imagine being his parents. If this Gaza operation even resembled a success, Israel could have said, OK Hamas, we’ll stop devastating your neighborhoods and killing your so-called civilians in exchange for two things: The rockets have to stop, and Shalit comes home.
What we see is that Hamas wasn’t all that devastated; if they were, they’d have taken the deal.
Instead, Israel quit, like Roberto Duran not coming out for the next round, “no mas,” throwing in the towel.
We know that Israel lost because Hamas set the terms: The rockets do not stop; Shalit stays where he is.
What would we be saying about Roosevelt and Churchill if they settled for a cease fire on Jan. 18, 1945, with the excuse that, hey, Hitler’s supply lines have been damaged, but yes, he can still bomb London, and yes, the Jews are still in the camps. Even if it’s only one Jew.
This war was supposed to re-establish Israel’s deterrence. That was supposed to be the lesson. Instead, the lesson is that Israel quits before the rockets do…
“THE MORAL CHASM THAT SEPARATES JEWS FROM THEIR ENEMIES”
In the third article below, Dennis Prager writes:
For those individuals – such as nearly all members of the world news media – who, in light of Israel’s invasion of Gaza – see moral equivalence between Israel and the Palestinians, here are some clarifying thoughts.
First, it would be difficult nearly to the point of impossibility, to find Israeli or other Jews who celebrate the deaths of Palestinian civilians. Jews both within and outside of Israel cringe when they see pictures of dead Palestinian men, women, and children in Gaza. For thousands of years at their Passover seders, Jews have removed wine from their cups to ceremonially weep for the Egyptians – their erstwhile slave owners for 400 years – who died during the Jews exodus. Jews have never stopped weeping for enemies.”
The opposite is the case with the large majority of Palestinians. It would be quite difficult to find many Palestinians who do not celebrate the deaths of Israeli Jews or non-Israeli Jews. This is not only reflected in Palestinian polls that show majority support for terrorism – and terrorism means killing innocent Jews – it is also reflected in Palestinian media, Palestinian schools, and Palestinian mosques that routinely glorify murderers of Jews, and refer to all Jews as monkeys and the like.
Take for example, Palestinian reaction to the 2001 Palestinian terror bombing of a Jerusalem Sbarro pizzeria in which 15 Jews, five of whom were two sets of parents and their children, were murdered and an additional 130 people were injured, some permanently maimed. *
As reported by the Associated Press, a month later, Palestinian university students opened an exhibition that included a grisly re-enactment of that mass murder. The students built a replica of the Sbarro pizzeria, with fake blood, splattered pizza, a plastic hand dangling from the ceiling, and a fake severed leg wearing jeans and a bloody black sneaker.
… Here’s the question: Can anyone even imagine Jews, in Israel or anywhere else on earth – no matter how right-wing they are politically or religiously – doing something analogous to celebrate the death of Palestinian civilians?
… The second point to be raised is about perspective.
If during World War II, Western news media had reported German and Japanese civilian casualties in the same detail and with the same sympathy they report Palestinian civilian casualties in Gaza, it is doubtful that the Nazis and the Japanese militarists would have lost that war. Certainly, at the very least, the anti-Nazi, anti-Fascist war effort would have been severely compromised.
[For more on the Sbarro pizza bomb victims please see here.]
FULL ARTICLES
“IN THE MIDDLE EAST, OPPORTUNITIES DON’T ALWAYS KNOCK TWICE”
Israel scored a tactical victory. But it missed a chance to finish off Hamas
By Bret Stephens
The Wall Street Journal
January 20, 2009
[Reporting from the Gaza border]
Atop a little hill near the beleaguered Israeli town of Sderot, a gaggle of TV crews train their cameras on the Gaza Strip, sentinels to a unilateral Israeli cease-fire that’s barely 12 hours old. Earlier the same day, Sunday, Hamas fired 20 rockets into Israel, raising questions about its intentions but causing little serious damage. Later, a pair of Israeli F-15s streak over Gaza City, releasing bursts of chaff but dropping no bombs.
And then comes word that Hamas has declared its own conditional, week-long cease-fire. The TV people clear out. All wars eventually end. The question most Israelis are asking is whether this one has merely gone on vacation.
So why are the top echelons of Israel’s political and military establishment delighted by the war’s result? Long answer: They think that Israel has re-established a reputation for invincibility tarnished in the 2006 war with Hizbullah; that they bloodied and humiliated Hamas while taking few casualties; that they called overdue international attention to the tunnels Hamas uses to smuggle its arsenal; and, with the unilateral cease-fire, that they put the onus to end the violence squarely back on Hamas’s shoulders.
Short answer: They think the war may be a regional game changer.
In a wide-ranging interview, a senior military official offers perhaps the most authoritative explanation of his government’s war aims and his interpretation of its effects. “We have no desire to go back into Gaza,” he says. “We decided we’re not going to spend five years [in Gaza] like the five years Americans spent in Iraq.”
On the contrary: Far from seeking regime change in Gaza, the official seems at ease that the Palestinians will remain bifurcated between Hamastan and Fatahland for many years more, the way Germany was divided during the Cold War. The idea is that a Hamas state in Gaza – somehow deterred from mischief – could become a kind of useful negative example to the Palestinians of the West Bank, somewhat in the way East Germany served West Germany as a monument to everything that was wrong with communism.
This leads the official to his second remarkable comment, after I ask whether Israel deliberately chose not to kill Ismail Haniyeh, the elected Palestinian prime minister and Hamas’s political leader in Gaza. “Israel tried to target people from the security apparatus and military wing,” he answers. “At this moment, we prefer that the less-radical wing will take over.”
The current divisions within Hamas are not the only ones the official sees as a consequence of the war. Palestinians, he says, no longer look to Hamas as the party of clean and competent government. Instead, they see a group whose leaders needlessly provoked a ruinous war they didn’t have the courage to fight themselves. No wonder the third intifada in the West Bank, on which Hamas had counted, never materialized.
Elsewhere, Hamas’s former patrons in the Arab world have split with the group ever since it became a client of Tehran. A dozen Arab states, along with the Palestinian Authority, boycotted an emergency summit of the Arab League, which had been intended as a show of support for Hamas supremo Khaled Mashal.
Then there is Egypt. For years, it took an ambivalent view of Hamas: partly worried by the threat it poses to its own secular regime, partly delighted by the trouble it causes Israel. Now the Mubarak government at last understands that Hamas is also a strategic threat to Egypt. “An Iranian base can play against Egypt the same way it played against Israel,” says the official. Almost as an aside, he adds that the timing of Israel’s operation in Gaza was dictated in part by the assessment that Hamas was just months away from obtaining longer-range missiles that could reach Cairo as easily as Tel Aviv.
Now the Israeli government is prepared to believe that the Egyptians will finally clamp down on the smuggling. Israel might even allow Egypt to deploy its army in greater force in the Sinai, despite the provisions against it in the Israeli-Egyptian peace treaty.
Finally there is Iran. “They have drawn a lesson,” says the official. “Once again, they saw that Israel has a good air force and good intelligence, and that the combination of the two can be deadly. Unlike in 2006, they saw a well-trained ground force. They found that asymmetrical warfare does not always play for them; that we can use asymmetrical approaches to overpower an asymmetrical threat.”
All this, of course, could be overturned the moment Iran goes nuclear and attempts to thwart Israel’s freedom of action. Nor is it foreordained that Israel will enjoy the relatively favorable international circumstances that facilitated the past three weeks of war, or that Hamas will perform poorly the next time. “Usually, the one who loses does his homework better,” observes the official.
Bottom line: Israel has scored an impressive tactical victory. But it has missed the strategic opportunity to rid itself of the menace on its doorstep. In the Middle East, opportunities don’t always knock twice.
WHY DOESN’T ANYBODY DARE SAY IT? ISRAEL DIDN’T LEAVE, IT LOST
Why doesn’t anybody dare say it? Israel didn’t leave, it lost
By Jonathan Mark
January 22, 2009
The first rule of pride is this: When they run you out of town, walk like you’re leading the parade.
I’ll give Israel this: When international pressure got to be too much, Israel left Gaza as if it was Israel’s bright idea, “a unilateral ceasefire.”
In truth, Israel surrendered. It is “surrender” if you leave with Hamas rockets still flying into Israel, and with Gilad Shalit remaining in his private Auschwitz. Imagine how Shalit was tortured these past three weeks. Imagine being his parents. If this Gaza operation even resembled a success, Israel could have said, OK Hamas, we’ll stop devastating your neighborhoods and killing your so-called civilians in exchange for two things: The rockets have to stop, and Shalit comes home.
What we see is that Hamas wasn’t all that devastated; if they were, they’d have taken the deal.
Instead, Israel quit, like Roberto Duran not coming out for the next round, “no mas,” throwing in the towel.
We know that Israel lost because Hamas set the terms: The rockets do not stop; Shalit stays where he is.
What would we be saying about Roosevelt and Churchill if they settled for a cease fire on Jan. 18, 1945, with the excuse that, hey, Hitler’s supply lines have been damaged, but yes, he can still bomb London, and yes, the Jews are still in the camps. Even if it’s only one Jew.
This war was supposed to re-establish Israel’s deterrence. That was supposed to be the lesson. Instead, the lesson is that Israel quits before the rockets do.
Israel has established in Gaza exactly what it established in the Hizbullah war: That Israel can go three weeks and only three weeks, and then Israel looks at its watch (or at the European Union’s watch) and goes home, job incomplete.
Hamas, like Hizbullah, is an Iranian satellite, a stand-in. This, like the 2006 war, is a harbinger of a worse war to come.
What if Iran is prepared to fight for four weeks? Is Israel prepared to go four? If Israel is so flustered by charges that it killed a stray civilian, be prepared that when Israel fights Iran we’ll be told that every Israeli bomb falling on Iran is landing on nothing and no one but women and children, innocent babies and maternity wards. If Israel attacks Iran, you can bet that Iran’s nuclear operation will suddenly be declared “peaceful,” generating only nuclear energy to help Iranian orphans and United Nations relief facilities. The so-called “international community” will then help rebuild Iran’s peaceful nuclear facility and they’ll call it humanitarian aid. Israel will then send Iran medical supplies and halvah. With that scenario, already played out by Israel with Hamas, I don’t see how Iran is deterred at all.
Israel should not be answering those who accuse Israel of war crimes by begging the cynics to believe that “we love life.” That’s embarrassing. It sounds like Mister Rogers.
If cynics accuse Jews of deliberately targeting civilians, don’t answer like that doomed drama queen in “A Streetcar Named Desire,” Blanche DuBoise: “Deliberate cruelty is unforgivable, and the one thing of which I have never, ever been guilty of.”
Jews should be very, very worried when their leaders sound exactly like Blanche DuBoise.
Instead, Jews should answer that the premise of war is that cruelty is indeed forgivable, some things are worth dying for; better yet, some things are worth YOU dying for – you, Hamas. Disproportionate? As Gen. Patton said, the purpose of war is not to die for your country, it’s to make the other son of a bitch die for his country. And that’s what Israel did, making Hamas killers and their civilian supporters die in a war that Hamas started and Israel should have finished.
“A Streetcar Named Desire”? Better another Brando movie, “The Godfather.” When charged with war crimes, Jews should answer unemotionally, but with total confidence, like Don Corleone: “I don’t apologize for taking care of my family.”
Israel had no business fighting this war in the first place, and risking the lives of Jewish soldiers, if Israel had no intention of going the distance. Why did any Israeli soldier have to die, leaving family, friends and lovers to mourn for the next 60 years? To set Hamas back six weeks? Israel didn’t set Hamas back six hours. Rockets were flying the day that Israel left Gaza.
And Israel continues to send “humanitarian aid” into Gaza, aid that Israel admits is being hijacked by Hamas. What parent would give their child’s kidnappers “humanitarian aid” without even demanding a phone call, a chance to hear their son’s voice, even a Red Cross visit to the kidnapped child? No, Israel is facilitating the flow of food, cash and supplies to Shalit’s kidnappers in exchange for nothing.
And if, God forbid, Shalit is already dead, then Israel ought to withhold aid to Hamas at least until Shalit gets a decent burial, if not long after, if Israel has any dignity left. There have been over two dozen instances in recent years in which the Palestinian Authority has suspended talks with Israel to protest one Israeli policy or another but Israel won’t suspend the sending of tons of supplies to Hamas to protest the torture and imprisonment of Shalit that is in total violation of the supposedly sacred Geneva guidelines for a prisoner of war.
That’s right, the very same Geneva guidelines for P.O.W.’s that so inflamed politicians, academics, clergy, editors and, ethicists from around the world to demand that Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo be closed, and that its Al Qaeda prisoners not be “tortured,” have never sparked a similar international campaign to close the Hamas dungeon where Shalit is tortured, a dungeon where war crimes are never tabulated. Odd, how concern for Shalit eludes the humanitarians. Pity him in his lonely war, the last Jewish soldier in Gaza.
In the end, like all Israeli wars, these past weeks were somehow inspirational if only for the courage and holiness of the soldiers. They are the best of us, and “us” is the key word. The goodness and passion of young Israelis – who were winning this war but who will suffer its consequences – may not deter Iran but it’s a reason to believe, and to fall in love with the Jewish people, all over again.
“ISRAEL IS MORE INTERESTED IN LIVING WITH WORLD CONDEMNATION THAN IN DYING WITH WORLD SYMPATHY”
Guess who cares about dead Palestinians? Jews!
By Dennis Prager
January 13, 2009
For those individuals – such as nearly all members of the world news media – who, in light of Israel’s invasion of Gaza – see moral equivalence between Israel and the Palestinians, here are some clarifying thoughts.
First, it would be difficult nearly to the point of impossibility, to find Israeli or other Jews who celebrate the deaths of Palestinian civilians. Jews both within and outside of Israel cringe when they see pictures of dead Palestinian men, women, and children in Gaza. For thousands of years at their Passover seders, Jews have removed wine from their cups to ceremonially weep for the Egyptians – their erstwhile slave owners for 400 years – who died during the Jews exodus. Jews have never stopped weeping for enemies.
The opposite is the case with the large majority of Palestinians. It would be quite difficult to find many Palestinians who do not celebrate the deaths of Israeli Jews or non-Israeli Jews. This is not only reflected in Palestinian polls that show majority support for terrorism – and terrorism means killing innocent Jews – it is also reflected in Palestinian media, Palestinian schools, and Palestinian mosques that routinely glorify murderers of Jews, and refer to all Jews as monkeys and the like.
Take for example, Palestinian reaction to the 2001 Palestinian terror bombing of a Jerusalem Sbarro pizzeria in which 15 Jews, five of whom were two sets of parents and their children, were murdered and an additional 130 people were injured, some permanently maimed.
As reported by the Associated Press, a month later, Palestinian university students opened an exhibition that included a grisly re-enactment of that mass murder. The students built a replica of the Sbarro pizzeria, with fake blood, splattered pizza, a plastic hand dangling from the ceiling, and a fake severed leg wearing jeans and a bloody black sneaker.
The exhibit also includes a large rock in front of a mannequin wearing the black hat, black jacket and black trousers typically worn by fervently-Orthodox Jews. A recording from inside the rock calls out: O believer, there is a Jewish man behind me. Come and kill him, paraphrasing a verse in the Koran. It became a popular tourist attraction for Palestinians, to which Palestinian parents took their little children.
Here’s the question: Can anyone even imagine Jews, in Israel or anywhere else on earth – no matter how right-wing they are politically or religiously – doing something analogous to celebrate the death of Palestinian civilians? I have spoken to Jewish groups on both U.S. coasts since the Israeli invasion of Gaza, and when the subject of Palestinian civilian deaths is mentioned, all I hear is regret and sadness.
This moral chasm that separates Israel from its enemies, and separates the Jews from their enemies, merely confirms what Hamas repeatedly says about itself: We love death more than the Jews love life. This motto is so true that Hamas not only doesn’t weep for dead Israelis, it doesn’t weep for dead Palestinians. It uses living Palestinians as human shields and uses dead Palestinians as propaganda. The moral disequilibrium is such that Jews weep for dead Palestinian far more than Hamas does.
The second point to be raised is about perspective.
If during World War II, Western news media had reported German and Japanese civilian casualties in the same detail and with the same sympathy they report Palestinian civilian casualties in Gaza, it is doubtful that the Nazis and the Japanese militarists would have lost that war. Certainly, at the very least, the anti-Nazi, anti-Fascist war effort would have been severely compromised.
The analogy is entirely apt. Hamas is on the same moral level as the two World War II enemies. Do those who condemn Israel for its attacks on Hamas fighters that have tragically resulted in hundreds of civilian Palestinian deaths also condemn the Allied bombings of German and Japanese military targets that resulted in far more civilian deaths? I suspect not since most critics of Israel still regard World War II as a moral war. The overriding issue, therefore, is whether fighting Hamas is moral. If it is, then the unintended death of Palestinian civilians is a tragedy, not an evil (except on the part of Hamas, because it situates its fighters and its missiles among civilians, including schools).
Third, if Hamas had the same ability to bomb Israel as Israel has to bomb Gaza, would the number of Jewish civilians be in the hundreds? Or would there be the Holocaust in Israel that Hamas and its Iranian sponsors dream of?
The answer is so obvious that this consideration alone renders moral Israel’s war to destroy Hamas. In a short period of time Hamas will have more accurate missiles and longer-range ones. One of them could kill a thousand or more. Another one could destroy passenger planes coming into Ben-Gurion Airport, thereby causing foreign airlines to stop flying into Israel. It is that inevitability that Israel is fighting to prevent. But in the morally confused world we live in, only with thousands of Israelis dead, would Israel’s invasion of Gaza be proportional, and therefore acceptable. But Israel is more interested in living with world condemnation than in dying with world sympathy.
* Italy’s leading newspaper, after a thorough investigation in Gaza, reports that the Gaza death toll was 500 to 600, mostly fighters, not 1,250 as other media have claimed. Other media relying on thoroughly impartial, bigoted UN sources
* “Hamas using UNRWA school buildings and hospitals as torture centers”
* Torture by Hamas of Palestinian opponents continues at a children’s hospital, but Western media and NGOs are suddenly silent
* Pro-Gaza demonstration in Ramallah canceled for a lack of protesters. Third Intifada? Not anytime soon
* New polls show only a minority of Americans now think Palestinians should have their own state
[This is a further dispatch on this month’s Israel-Hamas mini-war. This dispatch contains various notes and comments, mainly by myself. Another dispatch with articles by others on the war’s outcome, provisionally titled “Israel refuses to win,” will follow over the weekend. (Previous dispatches can be read here.)
CONTENTS
1. Gaza doctor: Hamas exaggerated death toll – 500 to 600 killed, mostly fighters
2. Number of Palestinians injured also “greatly exaggerated” by UN officials
3. Hamas fires from Gaza foreign press building
4. Hamas firing out of a school yard
5. European terrorists among participants at Belfast anti-Israel rally
6. BBC slips up: broadcasts British colonel defending IDF
7. Wave of executions by Hamas continues
8. Finally some Western media report on this
9. Hamas admits the crackdown (but still the BBC won’t mention it)
10. “Hamas using UNRWA school buildings and hospitals as torture centers”
11. Torture at a children’s hospital and a mental health center in Gaza City
12. Shin Bet chief: Hamas will resume arms smuggling to Gaza within a few months
13. … But AP shows film revealing the resumption of smuggling into Gaza has already begun
14. Hizbullah behind Lebanon rocket strikes in north
15. Gaza rockets hit Israel even after ceasefire
16. “Missiles to fall on Tel Aviv within one year”
17. Palestinian sources: “Iranian Unit” of Hamas destroyed
18. Former Canadian Justice Minister: Hamas’s behavior is a war crimes “case study”
19. Hamas gunmen hijack Jordanian aid shipment in the Gaza Strip
20. Where Hamas gets its money
21. McClatchy Poll: Americans less supportive of a Palestinian state than U.S. government
22. German police ban Israeli flags
23. Pro-Gaza demonstration in Ramallah canceled for lack of protesters
24. The humanitarian situation in Gaza
[All notes below by Tom Gross]
GAZA DOCTOR: HAMAS EXAGGERATED GAZA DEATH TOLL – 500 TO 600 KILLED, MOSTLY FIGHTERS, NOT 1,250
As was the case with Lebanon in 2006, and Jenin in 2002, the international media seem to have rushed to maximize the Palestinian death count in Gaza this month to make Israel look as bad as possible, blindly basing their “facts” on pro-Hamas sources, including completely discredited pro-Hamas UN officials.
Now more moderate Palestinian doctors have a different story to tell according to Italy’s leading newspaper, Corriere della Sera. The paper today quotes a Palestinian doctor at Shifa Hospital in Gaza City saying that, despite Hamas and UN claims, most of those killed in Gaza were members of the terror groups Hamas and Islamic Jihad.
“The number of deaths was between 500-600... most were young men between 17 and 23 who were recruited into the ranks of Hamas, which sent them to be slaughtered,” the doctor said.
Corriere della Sera correspondent Lorenzo Cremonesi confirmed that only 600 people were killed, and not 1,300 as was widely reported, based on hospital visits and discussions with families of the victims. (I know Lorenzo Cremonesi personally. He has been very harsh on Israel in the past but is honest and objective enough to now report the truth, unlike so many other international journalists covering the Middle East.)
“It was strange that the non-governmental organizations, including Western ones, repeated the high [1,250 death toll] number without checking, but the truth will come to light in the end,” said the Palestinian doctor.
“It’s like what happened in Jenin in 2002,” he said. “At the beginning they spoke of 500 dead; afterwards it was clear there were only 54 dead, at least 45 of them fighters.”
Corriere della Sera says they have verified the story and know the name of the doctor but are not identifying him to prevent his being killed by Hamas.
A Tal al-Hawa resident also told Corriere della Sera: “Armed Hamas men sought out a good position for provoking the Israelis. There were mostly teenagers, aged 16 or 17, and armed. They couldn’t do a thing against a tank or a jet. They knew they are much weaker, but they fired from our houses so that they could blame Israel for war crimes.”
NUMBER OF PALESTINIANS INJURED ALSO “GREATLY EXAGGERATED” BY UN OFFICIALS
Many international media have stated that 1,250 Palestinians were killed during Israel’s offensive against Hamas in the coastal territory without telling readers and viewers that these were completely unverifiable figures provided by pro-Hamas sources. Foreign governments then rushed to condemn Israel for the supposedly large number of civilians among the Palestinian dead, reporting that as many as half of the casualties may have been civilian. (At the same time, the media all but ignore the 132 other conflicts around the world, despite the much greater numbers of civilians deaths in many. Only today, for example, The Guardian – but not other newspapers – reports that a U.S. airstrike killed 25 civilians in Afghanistan.)
Cremonesi, who made several trips to all Gaza’s hospitals and interviewed families of casualties, assessed the number of wounded to be far lower than 5,000, the number quoted by Hamas and repeated by the UN and the Red Cross in Gaza. “It is sufficient to visit the hospitals to understand that the numbers don’t add up,” he wrote.
In the European hospital in Rafah, one of the facilities which would presumably be filled with wounded from the “war of the tunnels,” many beds were empty, according to Cremonesi. A similar situation was noted in the Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis, and in the privately-run Amal Hospital Cremonesi reported that only five out 150 beds were occupied.
13 Israelis were also killed during the 3-week operation, which was aimed at halting rocket fire on southern Israel and destroying Hamas’ infrastructure.
The Corriere della Sera article can be read (in Italian) here.
(For my writing on Jenin in 2002, please see Jeningrad.
And on Lebanon in 2006, please see Media Missiles.)
***
The IDF’s Gaza Coordination and Liaison Administration said today that they believe Cremonesi’s figures may be an underestimate and as many as 900 Palestinians in total died. They believe as many as 750 are Hamas and Islamic Jihad operatives (and Fatah men executed by Hamas) and 150 Palestinian civilians may have been killed in the conflict.
***
The IDF Gaza Division Commander, meanwhile, today branded Hamas’s use of women and children during the offensive in Gaza as “monstrous” and “inhumane.”
Brig. Gen. Eyal Eisenberg said the civilians were sent by Hamas to transfer weapons to gunmen during the offensive. He also accused the Islamist militant group of booby-trapping the homes of many civilians.
“Entire families in Gaza lived on top of a barrel of explosives for months without knowing,” Eisenberg said.
The officer asserted that despite international calls for investigations into alleged war crimes, Israeli soldiers adhered to the highest moral principles while fighting in Gaza.
***
INCREDIBLE PRECISION AT AVOIDING COLLATERAL DAMAGE
Unlike, for example, the shamefully biased British and French press, the leading German news magazine Der Spiegel has had good on-the-ground reporting from Gaza post-cease fire, noting the precision of Israel’s hits.
The magazine wrote: “Whole rows of houses stand in darkness. In between, precisely destroyed individual buildings can be seen again and again. There is usually a green Hamas flag lying in tatters somewhere in the rubble.”
***
NO, IT’S NOT STALINGRAD (AS SOME OTHER MEDIA SUGGESTED)
There is also the testimony of the (London) Daily Telegraph correspondent Tim Butcher. He is generally very harsh on Israel, which makes it all the more telling that this week he writes:
“I knew Gaza well before the attacks, so when Israel ended its ban on foreign journalists reaching Gaza on the day the ceasefire was announced, I was able to see for myself.
“One thing was clear. Gaza City 2009 is not Stalingrad 1944. There had been no carpet bombing of large areas, no firebombing of complete suburbs. Targets had been selected and then hit, often several times, but almost always with precision munitions. Buildings nearby had been damaged and there had been some clear mistakes, like the firebombing of the UN aid headquarters. But, in most cases, I saw the primary target had borne the brunt… For the most part, I was struck by how cosmetically unchanged Gaza appeared to be.”
***
Tom Gross adds: Here, for example, is a video of Israel changing a missile’s path and shooting into a field to avoid civilian casualties when a terrorist-filled car they were following drove into the driveway of a civilian house.
HAMAS FIRES FROM GAZA FOREIGN PRESS BUILDING
During the conflict Hamas didn’t only fire at Israel from hospitals and UN schools but also from the offices of Arab news media.
Here is live footage of al-Arabiya TV reporter Hannan al-Masri as she learns that a Hamas missile was being fired from her building which houses the al-Arabiya studio in Gaza.
ARABIC - www.youtube.com/watch?v=JY50cktUKbA
And with subtitles:
ENGLISH - www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bt_Y_3LKCGA
SPANISH - www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jw3j26pi2i4
RUSSIAN - www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAkL54eJPgk
GERMAN - www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7M07pvW4NU
FRENCH - www.youtube.com/watch?v=195u-HgC47c
HAMAS FIRING OUT OF A SCHOOL YARD
Hamas firing out of a school yard, Jan 8, 2009.
* The school is administered by UNRWA. UNRWA employs more than 24,000 staffers, 99% of whom are Palestinians. That’s more than any other UN agency, including the UNHCR, which has only a quarter the manpower of UNRWA yet has to take care of all other refugees worldwide, totaling more than 11 million. As I have pointed out in previous dispatches, the existence of UNRWA itself is one of the reasons the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has not yet been solved.
* During the three-week conflict Hamas sent 852 flying bombs packed with shrapnel into Israel – all aimed at civilian targets in what is as clear a case of a war crime as you can get – killing four Israelis and injuring over 700. Many Israeli civilians remain hospitalized, including seven-year-old Orel Yelizarov, who lies gravely injured with shrapnel in the brain.
EUROPEAN TERRORISTS AMONG PARTICIPANTS AT BELFAST ANTI-ISRAEL RALLY
Convicted Irish and Spanish terrorists were among the 2,000 people who participated in a rally in Belfast two weeks ago that demanded an end to the conflict in Gaza.
One of those taking part was the IRA’s “Brighton Bomber” Patrick Magee, who planted a bomb at Brighton’s Grand Hotel in 1984 targeting then-prime minister Margaret Thatcher and her cabinet, which killed two men and three women. Magee was released from jail in 1999.
Also present was convicted ETA bomber Juan Ignacio de Juana Chaos, who is wanted in Spain.
The rally was organized by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions (ICTU) and featured speeches by church, trade union and political representatives.
The 53-year-old ETA terrorist’s presence at the protest prompted a minister in the Northern Ireland Assembly to demand an apology from ICTU. Junior Democratic Unionist Party minister Jeffrey Donaldson called on the trade union leadership to “apologize to the people of Spain” for the sight of the ETA killer.
De Juana Chaos is on bail fighting extradition back to Spain, where he is wanted to face charges in connection with aiding acts of terrorism. He lives in Belfast where he receives social security and is currently learning English at a local college.
He served 21 years of a 3,000-year prison sentence for murdering 25 people and was arrested in Belfast last year after Spain issued an arrest warrant to the UK authorities.
BBC SLIPS UP: BROADCASTS BRITISH COLONEL DEFENDING IDF
Even though the BBC (which receives lavish public funding) is under a legal obligation to maintain balance, in its Mideast coverage it is notorious for the overwhelming preference it shows for inviting guests who will promote its agenda, whether they be anti-Israel non-Jews, or (the BBC’s favorites) anti-Israeli former Israelis like Professor Avi Shlaim (of Oxford university).
But here is one person who actually criticized Hamas who managed to sneak on.
Former British Colonel Richard Kemp, CBE, a former UK government advisor, defends Israel on BBC. “Never, in the history of warfare has an army taken so much care to ensure the safety of civilians as the IDF,” he says.
The interviewer ends by saying perhaps he can come back to talk about the issue some other time but I’m pretty sure he’ll never get another chance on the BBC.
***
Here is a broadcast from a satirical TV program in Israel (Israel’s equivalent of “Saturday Night Live”) mimicking BBC World News. The BBC’s Middle East broadcasts are the subject of much ridicule in Israel because they are so hopelessly biased.
WAVE OF EXECUTIONS BY HAMAS CONTINUES
I noted in previous dispatches that many of the Palestinians killed and injured in Gaza this month were shot by Hamas operatives who continue to crack down on Fatah and against any other sign of dissent against Hamas’s one-party rule. According to Palestinian sources, it is estimated that about ten percent of Gazans killed in the recent three week war between Hamas and Israel were Palestinians executed by Hamas.
These executions have been widely reported over the last month in the Palestinian and Israeli press (as well as on this website) but not by duplicitous Western news outlets like CNN and the BBC (the world’s two biggest international news broadcasters) who are interested in falsely suggesting that all Palestinian suffering is caused by Israel.
Sources in Gaza relate that some of the bodies of those Fatah men executed by Hamas were then laid out for filming by Palestinian cameramen working for international news agencies and relayed to gullible Western news outlets, which then reported that they were victims of Israeli attacks.
FINALLY SOME WESTERN MEDIA REPORT ON THIS
Finally one or two mainstream media (but not, of course, organizations like the BBC) are reporting on these executions by Hamas.
For example, today The San Francisco Chronicle began its news report:
“As Israel’s last troops left the Gaza Strip Wednesday, Hamas officials conceded that they are executing Palestinians suspected of collaborating with Israel during the three-week invasion.
“In the West Bank, Fatah officials said at least 19 of its members have been executed and many more brutally tortured. Gaza residents say Hamas is using schools and other public buildings in Gaza City, and in the towns of Khan Younis and Rafah as detention centers to interrogate members of Fatah, their political rivals. They said three men have been blinded during questioning and more than 60 have been shot in the legs as punishment.”
The San Francisco Chronicle continues:
“…In Gaza City, Fatah activists told spine-chilling stories of retribution. Relatives of Abed al-Gharabli, a former Fatah security officer who spent 12 years in an Israeli prison, said he was kidnapped by a group of Hamas militiamen who shot him in both legs after severely torturing him.
“Ziad Abu Hayeh, an Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade commander, is reported to have been blinded after being abducted from his home in Khan Younis by Hamas gunmen.
“In other cases, Fatah supporters were simply shot in the legs – a favored Hamas tactic during the 2007 coup that drove Fatah out of Gaza.”
HAMAS ADMITS THE CRACKDOWN (BUT STILL THE BBC WON’T MENTION IT)
Moussa Abu Marzook, the Damascus-based deputy leader of Hamas, told reporters yesterday that senior Fatah officials had “distributed candy celebrating the Gaza offensive, sent kisses to Israeli warplanes” and “guided these planes to their targets.”
Abu Marzook said they deserved to be punished and admitted that non-Hamas supporters were being executed in Gaza. These remarks were widely reported in the Middle East – for example, in the Qatari daily A-Sharq and the Lebanese daily Al-Hayat – but not in the West.
Ihab Ghissin, a spokesman for the Hamas Ministry of Interior in Gaza, confirmed the arrest of Fatah activists. “We have managed to capture a number of collaborators who are now being questioned for their role in aiding the Zionist aggression,” he told reporters in Gaza City.
Two other Hamas officials, Salah Bardaweel and Fawzi Barhoum, confirmed that Hamas is undertaking what he called a crackdown on “Abbas’s spies” in the Gaza Strip.
Hamas has fully controlled Gaza since June 2007, when it launched a coup against the Abbas government. At that time, about 400 Fatah supporters were killed and many others badly maimed.
“HAMAS USING UNRWA SCHOOL BUILDINGS AND HOSPITALS AS TORTURE CENTERS”
The Jerusalem Post’s Palestinian affairs correspondent Khaled Abu Toameh reports that hundreds of Fatah activists have been rounded up in Gaza in recent days.
Eyewitnesses said the detainees were being held in UN-run school buildings and hospitals that Hamas had turned into makeshift interrogation centers.
A Fatah official in Ramallah said that at least 100 of his men had been killed, wounded or tortured as a result of the Hamas crackdown this month.
According to the official, at least three of the detainees had their eyes gouged out by their interrogators, who accused them of providing Israel with wartime information about the location of Hamas militiamen and officials.
TORTURE AT CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL AND MENTAL HEALTH CENTER
Palestinian eyewitnesses said that a children’s hospital and a mental health center in Gaza City, as well as a number of school buildings in Khan Younis and Rafah, were among the places that Hamas had turned into “torture centers.”
Among the victims:
Relatives of Abed al-Gharabli, a former Fatah security officer who spent 12 years in Israeli prisons, said he was kidnapped by a group of Hamas militiamen who shot him in both legs after severely torturing him. Al-Gharabli has now been released.
Ziad Abu Hayeh, one of the commanders of Fatah’s armed wing, the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, is reported to have lost his sight after Hamas gunmen gouged out his eyes. According to Fatah activists, Abu Hayeh was kidnapped from his home in Khan Younis by Hamas militiamen.
On Saturday night, three brothers from the Subuh family were abducted by Hamas militiamen and taken to the Abdel Aziz Rantisi Mosque in Khan Younis, where they were shot in the legs.
Hamas gunmen shot and killed 80-year-old Hisham Tawfik Najjar after storming his home and beating his four sons, all Fatah activists.
***
In an editorial, Yediot Ahronot (Israel’s largest newspaper) says that, “Hamas is not a mass national liberation movement of the Palestinian people: It is tiny Islamo-Fascist organization that forcibly took control of a disheartened strip of land and turned it into a nightmare of an Islamic state.”
In an editorial, the Israeli daily Ma’ariv reminds its readers that, “The Americans battled 3,000 Hamas clones in Fallujah, Iraq. There it ended in 6,000 civilians killed and another 1,000 terrorists, as well as the destruction of a fifth of the city’s buildings.”
***
UPDATE: FATAH HIT BACK
Hamas activists say that hundreds of Hamas supporters, including journalists, university students and Muslim leaders, are being beaten, arrested and tortured across the West Bank as Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas takes revenge on Hamas for its crackdown on Fatah supporters in Gaza.
This doesn’t exactly increase the chances for Palestinian unity that U.S. President Barack Obama, who named former Sen. George Mitchell yesterday as his special Middle East envoy, has said is necessary as a first step to forge a lasting peace deal between Israelis and Palestinians.
SHIN BET CHIEF: HAMAS WILL RESUME ARMS SMUGGLING TO GAZA WITHIN A FEW MONTHS
Shin Bet chief Yuval Diskin on Sunday told the Israeli cabinet that Hamas would resume smuggling arms into Gaza within a few months, despite Israel’s recent destruction of many tunnels used for this purpose.
Diskin added that despite heavy criticism of Israel, Gaza residents are “fiercely criticizing Hamas for the destruction it has brought to Gaza.”
Diskin added that Hamas suffered a strategic surprise and that it “did not expect that Israel would begin an operation in the lead up to elections, not of such a scope and magnitude and not one in which Israel would send troops deep into Gaza.”
… BUT AP SHOWS FILM REVEALING THE RESUMPTION OF SMUGGLING INTO GAZA HAS ALREADY BEGUN
In fact, Diskin may well be underestimating Hamas’s abilities.
Yesterday, 4 days after the ceasefire, Associated Press (AP) Television showed Palestinian smugglers filling a fuel truck with gas that had come through a tunnel from Egypt. The footage also showed workers clearing blocked tunnels, and bulldozers carrying out other repairs.
One of the stated goals of the IDF offensive was to stop the smuggling through the hundreds of tunnels under the border.
Ha’aretz also reports that Palestinians are again channeling fuel and weapons from Sinai.
Yediot Ahronot reports that the American navy raided a ship in the Red Sea and uncovered Iranian-made ammunition hidden in crates and presumably destined for Hamas.
HIZBULLAH BEHIND LEBANON ROCKET STRIKES IN NORTH
An Israeli investigation has concluded that Hizbullah was behind the two Katyusha rocket attacks that struck northern Israel this month. In both cases, the organization used proxy Palestinian militant groups to launch the rockets from southern Lebanon. Hizbullah supplied the group with the rockets and rocket launchers and guided them as to targets.
Several ministers in the Lebanese government have expressed anger with Hizbullah for instigating the attacks on Israel, fearful that the Iran-backed Shia militia was again risking igniting a confrontation between Hizbullah and Israel.
***
The Times of London reports that a Hizbullah plot to attack the Israeli embassy in Azerbaijan was foiled last year, after it was discovered by Azeri Intelligence.
GAZA ROCKETS HIT ISRAEL EVEN AFTER CEASEFIRE
Palestinian terrorists in Gaza launched 18 rockets at civilians in southern Israel on Sunday even after Israel’s unilateral ceasefire. One house in the Israeli city of Ashdod took a direct hit, injuring its inhabitants. “The enemy has failed to end the rocket attacks and they are still reaching deep into the Zionist entity,” Hamas official Mushir al-Masri said.
On Tuesday night, the remainder of Israeli troops left Gaza, presumably more concerned about being out before Barack Obama took the oath of office in Washington (which was evening Israel time) than about threats from the Hamas leadership.
“MISSILES TO FALL ON TEL AVIV WITHIN ONE YEAR”
Several Israeli politicians are warning that Israel should not have caved in to international pressure and declared a ceasefire before they had properly damaged Hamas.
Israeli politician Avigdor Lieberman, leader of the Yisrael Beitenu party, warned of the ceasefire’s consequences by saying “missiles will fall on Tel Aviv within one year.” (In the next dispatch, there will be articles that deal in more detail with the ceasefire’s aftermath.)
PALESTINIAN SOURCES: “IRANIAN UNIT” OF HAMAS DESTROYED
The so-called “Iranian Unit” of Hamas has been destroyed, according to Gaza sources cited by Ha’aretz. The sources said most of the unit’s 100 members were killed in fighting in the Zeytun neighborhood of Gaza City.
The terrorists had been trained in infantry tactics, the use of anti-tank missiles and the detonation of explosives, among other skills, by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard at Hizbullah camps in Lebanon’s Beka’a Valley, as well as sites in Iran.
FORMER CANADIAN JUSTICE MINISTER: HAMAS IS A WAR CRIMES “CASE STUDY”
The fighting, tactics and ideology of Hamas are a “case study par excellence” of a systematic violation of international humanitarian law, according to Irwin Cotler, a leading expert in international law.
There is “almost no comparable example” anywhere in today’s world of a group that so systematically violates international agreements related to armed conflict, Cotler, who is a former Canadian justice minister, MP and law professor at Montreal’s McGill University (as well as being a longtime subscriber to this email list) told The Jerusalem Post.
Hamas is committing at least six violations of international law, Cotler explained, namely:
* The deliberate targeting of civilians
* The launching of attacks from within civilian areas and civilian structures, whether it be an apartment building, a mosque or a hospital, in order to be immune from a response from Israel
* The misuse and abuse of humanitarian symbols for purposes of launching attacks
* The direct and public incitement to genocide against an entire people (the Jews)
* The scope of the attack on civilians, which upgrades the violation to a crime against humanity
* The recruitment of children into armed conflict
[The French NGO Avocats sans frontiers, under the leadership of Maître Gillest-William Goldnadel, is moving to take the case against Hamas to the International Court in The Hague, based on the above-mentioned elements.]
HAMAS GUNMEN HIJACK JORDANIAN AID SHIPMENT IN THE GAZA STRIP
The Jordan government-controlled Petra News Agency reports that on Tuesday a number of armed militia in Gaza seized an aid convoy sent by the Jordan Hashemite Charity Organization (JHCO) after it entered the Gaza Strip via Karem Abu Salem Crossing Point.
During the recent conflict, Hamas raided over 100 aid trucks that Israel had allowed into Gaza, stole their contents and sold them to the highest bidders.
The IDF said UNRWA and the Red Cross officials had effectively allowed Hamas to seize the aid, and Israel could do nothing to prevent such raids, since it didn’t want to be seen endangering UNRWA and the Red Cross personnel.
WHERE HAMAS GETS ITS MONEY
Rachel Ehrenfeld reports in Forbes magazine that despite repeated promises by Western nations to cut off funds for Hamas, international aid organizations and many countries kept on sending money to Gaza. She reports that hundreds of millions of dollars are being funneled through the Royal Bank of Scotland Group, the Arab Bank PLC in Gaza and HSBC in Amman, Jordan, among other sources.
MCCLATCHY POLL: AMERICANS LESS SUPPORTIVE OF A PALESTINIAN STATE THAN U.S. GOVERNMENT
A new poll taken by America’s McClatchy news agency shows fewer Americans favor the creation of a Palestinian state than might have been presumed.
Although for years American government officials have reflexively uttered the mantra calling for “Israel and the Palestinians to live side by side in independent states,” only 31 percent of Americans polled favor a Palestinian state at all, while 45 percent oppose it and 24 percent have no opinion.
There are hundreds of national and ethnic groups around the world that would like their own state, and Americans (unlike Europeans) don’t see any particular reason why the Palestinians should be head of the list of nations that deserve states, especially since any likely Palestinian state may become a security threat to the U.S. and the region.
Separately, a new Pew poll found that Americans sympathize with Israel rather than the Palestinians, by a 49 percent to 11 percent margin. It also found that 41 percent of Americans think Hamas is responsible for this month’s violence as opposed to 12 percent who hold Israel responsible. 50 percent believe that Israel has responded “about right,” 7 percent said it “has not gone far enough,” and 24 percent said “Israel reacted too strongly.”
(Pew Poll here.)
GERMAN POLICE BAN ISRAELI FLAGS
In addition to the many fiercely anti-Israel demonstrations this month, there have also been sizeable pro-Israel demonstrations even in places not accustomed to pro-Israel rallies, such as Warsaw and Kiev where thousands of people flew Israeli flags in public squares.
But in the German cities of Duisburg and Düsseldorf, located in the state of North Rhine-Westphalia, police officials prevented pro-Israeli supporters from displaying Israeli flags.
The move has been criticized by the Central Council of Jews in Germany. Duisburg Police Chief Rolf Cebin has now posted a statement on the police website, saying “I deeply regret that feelings, especially those of our Jewish fellow citizens, were hurt. The removal of the flags was, as we see it today, the wrong decision.”
PRO-GAZA DEMONSTRATION IN RAMALLAH CANCELED FOR LACK OF PROTESTERS
While irate pop stars, former communists and Islamic fundamentalists protested in “pro-Hamas” rallies through Europe, the liberal Israeli daily Ha’aretz reported (January 15):
“It’s quiet in Ramallah. At the northern entrance to the city, not far from the mall, a new fountain spouts water. Next to it lies a sign in English: ‘Gaza under fire.’ But it seems the Gaza Strip has never been so far away. Tel Aviv, meanwhile, feels closer than ever. Almost every day at 1 P.M., a demonstration leaves Manara Square in the city center, expressing support for the residents of the Gaza Strip. The number of participants has declined, however, on a daily basis, and on Wednesday the demonstration was called off for a lack of protesters.
“Dozens of men sit in cafes near the square playing cards. In the background, the television blasts the voices of Al-Jazeera reporters, who provide continual updates about the events taking place in the Strip. But even the dramatic reports do not stop the card players for a moment. Occasionally one of them glances up at the screen, but then gets back to business.
“The offices of the Al-Jazeera television network overlook Manara Square. Walid Omari, the bureau chief for the Palestinian Authority and Israel, explains that ‘the residents of Ramallah are filling the cafes, the restaurants, watching Al-Jazeera, cursing the situation, expressing anger and then continuing with their own affairs.’
“The residents of Ramallah and other West Bank cities have always looked down on their brethren in Gaza. Second, the Hamas coup in the Strip about a year and a half ago left behind quite a few scars. To see innocent Palestinian citizens killed in bombings is sad, but for quite a number of Fatah supporters, Hamas brought this upon itself. Mohammed, a 46-year-old businessman, offers another reason for the apathy: “We’re afraid to see the tanks outside the house again.”
Third Intifada? Not anytime soon
THE HUMANITARIAN SITUATION IN GAZA
Hamas propagandists tell many lies. Some are obvious, such as its claim at a press conference on Monday that its men destroyed 47 Israeli tanks and armored vehicles, killed 80 IDF soldiers and wounded hundreds of others.
Indeed, Hamas’s claim that it has emerged victorious from Operation Cast Lead is reminiscent of the fiery statements of Ahmed Said, the famous Egyptian radio announcer who, during the Six Day War, continued to report the fictional downing of dozens of Israeli warplanes after Israel had destroyed the Arab air forces.
While there is obviously hardship in Gaza, as there is in depressed towns all over the world, the exaggeration of the so-called humanitarian crisis in Gaza is startling, as is the fact that so many are taken in by it.
A mass of international aid continues to be delivered to Gaza – if only parts of Africa or Asia were so lucky – and the standard of living there is higher than in many parts of neighboring Egypt.
Every day the Israeli government sends press releases to Middle East correspondents outlining the aid Israel is delivering but few media outlets report this.
Here is what they don’t report: Since December 27, Israel has transferred more than 450,000 gallons of fuel and over 42,000 tons of humanitarian supplies to Gaza in 1,693 trucks.
Magen David Adom (Israel’s Red Cross) set up a medical clinic on the Israeli side of the Erez check point to serve the Palestinian population. Paramedics are working with volunteer doctors, specializing in family medicine, pediatrics, gynecology, trauma, orthopedics and surgery. The clinic is equipped with laboratories, X-ray machines and a pharmacy. After diagnosis, patients may be transferred to Israeli hospitals so MDA ambulances have been sent to the clinic.
On January 19 alone, 195 trucks laden with 4,946 tons of supplies, 537,100 liters of heavy duty diesel and 206 tons of domestic gas were delivered to Gaza and 33 Palestinians left Gaza for medical treatment in Israel, including eight cancer patients en route to Augusta Victoria hospital in Jerusalem.
***
THE LIES THEY TELL
Here is a reminder from a previous dispatch of the way anti-Israeli journalists lie about Gaza:
Please see the first item here to see Lauren Booth (who is a British journalist writing for several prominent British newspapers, as well as being Mideast peace mediator Tony Blair’s sister in law) happily shopping in a packed Gaza grocery store a few days before she said that Gaza resembled a “concentration camp”.
* French public TV forced to admit by Le Figaro newspaper that footage it showed of “Israeli massacre” in Gaza on Tuesday was really from an incident caused by Hamas in 2005
* Same network that broadcast the doctored Mohammed al-Dura footage in 2000
* CNN, BBC CBS, ABC, Sky News, The Times (of London), The Independent and The New York Times all quote Norwegian doctor Mads Gilbert’s dubious statistics from Gaza without explaining he is a longtime Hamas sympathizer who justified the 9/11 attacks on the U.S.
* Palestinian journalists: Hamas stealing aid supplies to sell to residents
* The NYT and Washington Post op-ed pages are very tough on Israel today. The WP is running a Jimmy Carter piece that appears factually challenged
* Four Katyusha rockets were fired at civilians in northern Israel from Lebanon this morning. Two Israelis were wounded. Initial reports suggested the rockets were fired from south of the Litani River, in a zone meant to be under the protection of UNIFIL – the United Nations peacekeeping force. (Reminder: in 2006, 4000 rockets fired by Hizbullah in 2006 resulted in the deaths and injuries of hundreds of Israelis.)
* Long-range rockets continue to strike southern Israeli towns and cities
I attach one more dispatch on the ongoing Israel-Hamas confrontation. This one concerns the media coverage. (Previous dispatches can be read here.)
There won’t be any dispatches next week because I will be too busy with other work. Thank you to the large number of people who have written about the previous Gaza dispatches. I apologize for not having time to reply to everyone individually.
CONTENTS
1. “The media are protesting too much”
2. Legitimate security concerns
3. Why ambulances sometimes get targeted by the Israeli airforce
4. Mortar bombs fired from a UN school in Gaza
5. Gaza “kindergarten graduation ceremony”
6. Military doubts
7. French TV again caught using false footage defaming Israel
8. “Death to Palestine, wait, I mean Israel”
9. Why is the media quoting Dr Mads Gilbert without telling viewers of his support for 9/11?
10. Calls on heads of Amnesty and HRW to resign over failure to protest Gaza human shields
11. Islamist site “compiling list of British Jews to target over Gaza op”
12. Gaza offensive spurs rise in anti-Semitic incidents across Europe
13. Court rules that Jewish Israel critic can be called an anti-Semite
14. Joe the Plumber to become war correspondent
15. “Ask Egypt to let you into the Gaza Strip” (Jerusalem Post, Jan. 8, 2009)
16. “Israel acts because the world won’t defend it” (London Times, Jan. 7, 2009)
[All notes above by Tom Gross]
“THE MEDIA ARE PROTESTING TOO MUCH”
Below, in the “full articles” section, I attach a long piece from today’s Jerusalem Post about the world media’s virtually nonstop complaints on the limitations of media access to witness the fighting firsthand in Gaza. There are several people, including the chief New York Times correspondent, quoted in the article. The section in which I am quoted is as follows:
Yet, regardless of the justice of the IDF’s blockade on foreign media entry, it was not appropriate for the media to turn the issue into such a major part of its coverage of the crisis, said analyst and former Middle East correspondent for the British Sunday Telegraph Tom Gross.
Major international outlets such as the BBC, CNN and Sky News have started most reports on Gaza in recent days by stating that Israel has not given their correspondents access to Gaza, he noted.
According to Gross, “the media are protesting too much. One British TV correspondent even compared Israel to the Burmese junta. They might ask themselves why they are not complaining, for example, about the difficulties of reporting from Afghanistan, where there are tens of thousands of American, British, French and other troops, and a very high civilian death toll.”
There is more coverage just of Israel’s cordon than of entire international crises elsewhere, Gross added.
“Viewers might wonder why the media are so obsessed with everything and anything to do with Israel but don’t seem interested in covering other conflicts, like the massive assault by the Sri Lankan military on the Tamil minority in recent days, or the massacre of 500 villagers, including aid workers, some of whom were set on fire in Congo last week,” he said.
Journalists should expect “some limits imposed in wartime. This isn’t a reality TV show or an episode of Big Brother. In any case, this hasn’t stopped international networks showing near round-the-clock reports and footage by their local Palestinian correspondents in Gaza,” said Gross.
LEGITIMATE SECURITY CONCERNS
I might add that Israel may also have legitimate security concerns about some international journalists giving intelligence information away to Palestinian militants that could endanger lives.
(Israel also feels it cannot expose its own administrative personnel to attacks from Hamas at the crossings. Several have been shot there by Hamas in the past. They limit exposure to passage of humanitarian aid, and won’t put them in jeopardy to clear reporters.)
For an account of how the media became actors in the 2006 conflict between Hizbullah and Israel, please read my article “The media aims its missiles”.
In it, I wrote that “Large sections of the international media are not only misreporting the current conflict in Lebanon. They are also actively fanning the flames.”
For the record, the media coverage of the present conflict has, at least until now, not been nearly as partisan against Israel as it was in the 2006 conflict, although there is still much room for improvement.
WHY AMBULANCES SOMETIMES GET TARGETED BY THE ISRAELI AIRFORCE
This short video shows U.N. ambulances serving as personnel carriers for Hamas terrorists.
This particular video is from the West Bank in 2003. But we know that this has happened on many occasions, including in the present conflict in Gaza. Palestinian gunmen think nothing of using UN and Red Crescent ambulances. Israel doesn’t want to fire at ambulances but on the very rare occasion it does, it is doing so because they are not being using to ferry patients but to ferry killers. Most mainstream media continue to refuse to explain this, instead leaving their audience with the false impression Israel is shooting at civilians.
Even more shockingly, UN spokespeople like Chris Gunnes (UNRWA spokesperson for Gaza) who has appeared daily on international TV networks this month to defame Israel in virtually every way possible, has nothing to say about the collaboration between Palestinian terrorists and some UN personnel.
VIDEO: MORTAR BOMBS FIRED FROM A UN SCHOOL IN GAZA
This video of terrorists firing rockets at Israel from the yard of an UNRWA school was filmed by an unmanned drone on Oct. 29, 2007, but we also know this has happened on several occasions, including this week.
UN spokespeople are strangely silent about this, and the BBC and other broadcasters “forget” to mention this in their hundreds of hours of anti-Israeli broadcasts.
In the horrific incident two days ago when Palestinian civilians were killed at an UNRWA school, Israel has released film showing mortar bombs being fired from the school minutes before Israel responded. Hamas admit that two of its leading mortar crewmen, Immad Abu Iskar and Hassan Abu Iskar, were among the dead there.
The Israeli return fire landed outside the school, yet a series of explosions followed, indicating the probable presence of munitions and explosives in the building.
The international community – and in particular UNRWA, the UN agency that runs the school – has turned a blind eye to the storage of weapons on their facilities in violation of international humanitarian and many other laws. No one would have been killed at the school if weapons were not stored there and fired from there. UNRWA and the member states that cover up for its terror-supporting activities have blood on their hands (not that the mainstream media bother questioning them about this).
GAZA “KINDERGARTEN GRADUATION CEREMONY”
Here.
***
Click here to see video footage of an armed Hamas terrorist grabbing an innocent young Palestinian boy off the street to use as a human shield. (The image of the terrorist is so distressing that YouTube have moved it to their over 18 section.)
***
In this video, Hamas admits to using women and children as human shields.
MILITARY DOUBTS
I continue to feel uneasy (both strategically and morally) about the decision by Israel to extend the air operation into a ground campaign in Gaza. I don’t have any military expertise so I cannot tell whether the initial air operation would have been sufficient by itself to weaken Hamas to the point where in future it would actually abide by a ceasefire. The launch of a ground operation inevitably leads to the loss of Palestinian civilian life, however hard Israel is trying to avoid this – and it is trying much harder than almost any other army in history, to the point that Israelis put their own lives at risk in order to try and avoid inadvertent Palestinian civilian casualties.
Clearly, removing Hamas or forcing it to change its policies is one of the preconditions for achieving a peaceful settlement between Israelis and Palestinians.
Yet, on balance I fear the ground campaign may be a mistake, as it may have been in Lebanon in 2006.
Since Israel almost certainly does not want to reoccupy Gaza, we shall see whether some time after the IDF leaves, the rockets start falling on Ashdod and Beersheba again. I hope I am wrong and the ground operation, which includes the destruction of more stockpiles of Hamas rockets and its arms smuggling tunnels, will bring about quiet and hence greater prosperity on both sides of the Israel-Gaza border.
FRENCH TV AGAIN CAUGHT USING FALSE FOOTAGE DEFAMING ISRAEL
Bloggers in France have forced the state-owned French public television channel France 2 to admit that footage it aired that allegedly showed destruction caused by the Israeli air force this week, was in fact taken from an incident in 2005 in which Gaza civilians were killed by an explosion caused by Hamas militants in the Strip.
The footage aired on France 2 on Tuesday afternoon showed dozens of dead bodies, including civilians, which the channel said were killed by an Israeli air force bombing raid on January 1st. The footage was in fact that of the devastation caused after a truck full of explosives Hamas was smuggling blew up in the Jabaliya Refugee Camp in 2005.
The website of Le Figaro newspaper published the error after it was spotted by bloggers. France 2 has now admitted it “accidentally” used false footage.
France 2 is the same channel that broadcast a staged September 2000 report of the IDF allegedly showing the IDF fatally shooting a 12-year-old Palestinian boy called Mohammed al-Dura. A French court ruled last year that there was reasonable cause to claim the report and footage was staged.
The death-footage of al-Dura became a cause célèbre in the Muslim and western world. Osama bin Laden referred to al-Dura in a post-9/11 video; the killers of Wall St. Journal reporter Daniel Pearl placed a picture of him in their beheading video; streets, squares and academies have been named after al-Dura.
“DEATH TO PALESTINE, WAIT, I MEAN ISRAEL”
This video from Iran is doing the rounds among hundreds of anti-regime Iranian bloggers.
At first the prayer leader chants “Death to Israel,” with others repeating it after him. But then in what appears to be a sign of opposition to the regime in Tehran, he shouts “Death To Palestine,” and everyone repeats it after him.
WHY IS THE MEDIA QUOTING MADS GILBERT WITHOUT TELLING VIEWERS HE JUSTIFIED THE 9/11 ATTACKS?
Many media, particularly the BBC and CNN, have broadcast several interviews in recent days with a Norwegian doctor and anesthetist Mads Gilbert working in Shifa hospital in Gaza. Gilbert claims a much higher ratio of civilian casualties than even Hamas and the UN claim and, judging by their past records, the UN and Hamas statistics are almost certainly exaggerated.
(In this conflict, the UN says Palestinian fatalities are estimated at over 600 with some 2,000 wounded. 20-25% of Palestinian casualties are civilians, and 75-80% are Hamas operatives, says the UN. Israel says a smaller proportion of Palestinian casualties are civilians.)
But who is Mads Gilbert?
While I can’t comment on his ability as a doctor, the BBC and others should certainly have pointed out his long record as a political extremist. Gilbert has also appeared or been quoted on CBS, CNN, ABC, Sky News, The Times (London), The Independent, The New York Times and other media.
Gilbert has been active in “solidarity work” with Palestinian militants since the 1970s. Immediately after the 9/11 attacks on New York in 2001, he told the Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet that the attacks were “morally right.” “Terror is a bad weapon, but you have to look at the context,” he said.
NGO Monitor and other groups are now questioning why media are using such a radical ideologue as Dr. Mads Gilbert, to provide blatantly one-sided criticism of Israel.
Dr. Gilbert and his colleague Dr. Erik Fosse traveled to Gaza on December 31 as members of the Norwegian Aid Committee (NORWAC), an NGO funded by the Norwegian government ostensibly to provide health care in partnership with the Palestinian Ministry of Health. Since arriving in Gaza, Gilbert has repeatedly and falsely accused Israel of deliberately targeting civilians. At the same time, he has made no mention of evidence that Shifa hospital has been used for military purposes.
DR. GILBERT, LONGTIME ACTIVIST
In their interviews, Gilbert and Fosse claim that Israel and the UN are lying about the civilian casualty count and giving media their own alternative data: “50% of the casualties are women and children,” Gilbert told CBS; “children made up 25% of the deaths and 45% of the wounded,” he told the BBC. Gilbert even appeared on Iran’s Press TV alleging the Israelis had used chemical weapons against the Palestinians.
Dr. Fosse worked for the PLO in Lebanon in the 1970’s. He now leads NORWAC, the Norwegian Aid Committee.
Gilbert has even criticized the group “Doctors Without Borders” for providing medical assistance to both sides in the conflict rather than limiting it to Palestinians.
Gilbert is a former member of the fringe left Red Party in Norway, which has its roots in the Norway’s Communist Party. Gilbert stood as the party’s candidate in local elections in the town of Tromsoe in 2007.
NGO Monitor’s Director Prof. Gerald Steinberg, who is a subscriber to this email list, notes that: “By justifying terror, supporting Hamas and fueling the conflict, NORWAC and Mads Gilbert have violated the Hippocratic Oath – ‘first, do not harm’.”
NGO MONITOR CALLS ON HEADS OF AMNESTY, HRW AND B’TSELEM TO RESIGN OVER FAILURE TO PROTEST GAZA HUMAN SHIELDS
NGO Monitor has also called for the immediate resignation of the heads of the leading human rights organizations Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and B’tselem for failing to protest the use of human shields by Hamas in Gaza.
NGO Monitor said: “Hamas’ preparations for the current war, including the storage of weapons in civilian neighborhoods and schools, are violations of fundamental moral and legal principles which are now resulting in numerous tragic deaths. Although these plans have been visible for a long time, human rights organizations which claim a moral mandate, have instead used their considerable resources to promote political bias and double standards. They have chosen to distort international law, falsely accusing Israel of ‘collective punishment’ rather than focus on the core human rights violations of Hamas.
“While the Hamas leadership was smuggling and manufacturing thousands of rockets, mortars, and other weapons, declaring their intention to use them to terrorize Israel, these organizations turned a blind eye, instead repeatedly criticizing only Israel.”
ISLAMIST SITE “COMPILING LIST OF BRITISH JEWS TO TARGET OVER GAZA OP”
An extremist Islamic website is believed to be drawing up a list of prominent British Jews to kill over Israel’s offensive against Hamas in Gaza, The Sun newspaper reported yesterday.
According to the newspaper, targets include pop star Amy Winehouse, record producer Mark Ronson, Foreign Secretary David Miliband, Tony Blair’s Middle East envoy and tennis partner Lord Levy, and presenter of “The Apprentice” TV show, Sir Alan Sugar.
The report came as a British Jewish watchdog group, the Community Security Trust, said there has been a rise in anti-Semitic incidents in Britain in recent days.
GAZA OFFENSIVE SPURS RISE IN ANTI-SEMITIC INCIDENTS ACROSS EUROPE
Since the latest Israel-Hamas confrontation began there has been an upsurge in assaults against Jews across Europe, including arson attacks on Jewish congregations in France, Sweden and Britain.
Assailants rammed a burning car into the gates of a synagogue in Toulouse, in southwest France, on Monday night. Unlighted gasoline bombs were also found in a car in the Toulouse synagogue’s yard. A local Jewish leader, Armand Partouche, said he believed the assailants had planned to torch the synagogue, but fled when the building’s alarm went off.
“It could have been very, very serious,” Partouche said. “There were people inside; there could have been deaths.”
A Jewish man was beaten up in the Auber RER rapid transit station in Paris on Sunday. Michael Benamou, aged 29, was attacked and punched in the mouth by about 20 young people yelling ‘‘Palestine will kill the Jews.” On the crowded metro platform, only one man with a dog intervened. He took Benamou to the hospital.
A 14-year-old junior high school student (girl) was attacked in Villiers le Bel in France by students shouting “Jews must die.”
A Jewish congregation in Helsingborg, in southern Sweden, also was attacked Monday night by someone who (according to police spokesman Leif Nilsson) “broke a window and threw in something that was burning,” said. Neighbors alerted rescue services before the fire took hold.
In Denmark, a 27-year-old Lebanese-born Dane shot two young Israelis last week, as I mentioned in a previous dispatch.
In London there was an arson attempt on a synagogue in north London on Sunday.
Police in the Belgian cities of Antwerp and Brussels continue to patrol Jewish districts after mobs tried to attack Jews there last week. Police said burning rags were shoved through the mailbox of a Jewish home in Antwerp last weekend.
Following on from my dispatch last week about the anti-Semitic rallies in Florida and elsewhere, the crowd at an anti-Israel rally in Amsterdam on Saturday repeatedly chanted, “Hamas! Hamas! Jews to the gas.”
COURT RULES THAT JEWISH ISRAEL CRITIC CAN BE CALLED AN ANTI-SEMITE
A Cologne appeals court ruled on Tuesday that German-Jewish journalist Henryk Broder is allowed to describe the statements of fellow Jew Evelyn Hecht-Galinski as anti-Semitic.
“Even German courts are beginning to understand that it is not enough to be Jewish in order not to be anti-Semitic,” said Broder (who is a subscriber to this email list and is currently in Israel covering the Gaza war for Der Spiegel’s Web site).
Hecht-Galinski equated Israeli policies with Nazi Germany’s, and blamed a “Jewish-Israel lobby” for threatening the world.
There is a long history of radical, psychologically disturbed Jewish self-haters siding with anti-Semites, including during the Spanish inquisition, Stalin’s attacks on Jews, and even in 1930s Nazi Germany.
JOE THE PLUMBER TO BECOME WAR CORRESPONDENT
Joe the Plumber, the Ohio man who became a household name during the U.S. presidential campaign, says he is heading to Israel as a war correspondent for the pajamas media website (pjtv.com).
Joe the Plumber, whose real name is Samuel J. Wurzelbacher, says he’ll spend 10 days covering the fighting.
He told WNWO-TV in Toledo, Ohio that he wants to let Israel’s “‘Average Joes’ share their story.”
Wurzelbacher gained attention during the final weeks of the campaign when he asked Barack Obama about his tax plan. He later joined Republican candidate John McCain on the campaign trail and said he was very worried about the fate of Israel under an Obama presidency.
Wurzelbacher, who is not Jewish, has expressed understanding of the need for Israel to defend itself against Hamas.
[All notes above by Tom Gross]
FULL ARTICLES
“ASK EGYPT TO LET YOU INTO THE GAZA STRIP”
“Ask Egypt to let you into the Gaza Strip”
By Haviv Rettig Gur and Ehud Zion Waldoks
The Jerusalem Post
January 8, 2009
www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1231167302983&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
While world media coverage of the fighting in Gaza is generally deemed by Israeli officials to be fair, the Foreign Ministry expressed anger on Wednesday at the media’s focus on foreign journalists’ demands to be allowed into the Strip to witness the fighting firsthand.
“News reports from Gaza haven’t stopped flowing for a minute, both in print and in visuals, so the claim that we’re trying to hide something is contradicted by the evidence on every television screen,” said Foreign Ministry spokesman Yigal Palmor.
Foreign journalists have been blocked from entering Gaza since November. The Foreign Press Association filed a complaint last week to the High Court of Justice, which ruled that the government had to allow journalists to enter if conditions permitted. Foreign journalists understood the ruling as a court order to allow them into Gaza, while the IDF has argued that the escalation of fighting in the form of a ground offensive has created a new, more dangerous situation near the border crossings that gives the army the discretion not to open them.
“Why isn’t the international media trying its luck with Egypt?” Palmor wondered. Egypt shares a border with Gaza on the Strip’s southern side. “Instead they report on the Israeli cordon and not the Egyptian one. Both countries have the same interest in the same policy - Hamas is equally dangerous to Israel, to Egypt and to the Palestinian Authority.”
(The IDF Spokesman’s Unit released a statement on Wednesday saying that the army had permitted the entry of a limited embed press pool into the Gaza Strip and would be distributing footage from this pool.)
Foreign correspondents have taken issue with Israel’s reasons for closing the Strip to them, saying the IDF was being untruthful when it claimed conditions were too dangerous to open the crossings.
“If conditions permitted opening [the crossings] for five hours last Friday to let out 300 foreign nationals, what was the problem with stamping our passports and letting us in?” asked New York Times Jerusalem bureau chief Ethan Bronner.
The reality, say many journalists, is that Israel does not trust foreign journalists to report objectively. Several journalists who spoke to The Jerusalem Post mentioned last week’s statement by Government Press Office director Danny Seaman that foreign correspondents would use their time in Gaza to report Hamas propaganda unchallenged, conferring on it the respectability of a foreign news report.
According to the correspondents, Israel’s behavior is self-defeating, because their reporting could balance the images now coming out of Gaza by reporting more information than Hamas is releasing.
“My last visit in Gaza was on November 2 and 3. I’m not saying the place is a Jeffersonian democracy, but it’s not true that foreign journalists are not free to function, that they are somehow slaves of Hamas ideology. It’s simply false,” said Bronner.
Yet, regardless of the justice of the IDF’s blockade on foreign media entry, it was not appropriate for the media to turn the issue into such a major part of its coverage of the crisis, said analyst and former Middle East correspondent for the British Sunday Telegraph Tom Gross.
Major international outlets such as the BBC, CNN and Sky News have started most reports on Gaza in recent days by stating that Israel has not given their correspondents access to Gaza, he noted.
According to Gross, “the media are protesting too much. One British TV correspondent even compared Israel to the Burmese junta. They might ask themselves why they are not complaining, for example, about the difficulties of reporting from Afghanistan, where there are tens of thousands of American, British, French and other troops, and a very high civilian death toll.”
There is more coverage just of Israel’s cordon than of entire international crises elsewhere, Gross added.
“Viewers might wonder why the media are so obsessed with everything and anything to do with Israel but don’t seem interested in covering other conflicts, like the assault by the Sri Lankan military on the Tamil minority in recent days, or the massacre of 500 villagers, including aid workers, some of whom were set on fire in Congo last week,” he said.
Journalists should expect “some limits imposed in wartime. This isn’t a reality TV show or an episode of Big Brother. In any case, this hasn’t stopped international networks showing near round-the-clock reports and footage by their local Palestinian correspondents in Gaza,” said Gross.
The closure has led to real anger on the part of the foreign media.
“If Israel is the leading democracy in the region and has a system of justice to which its military and political authorities are responsible, why on earth aren’t they allowing journalists to do their job?” asked Aidan White, secretary-general of the Brussels-based International Federation of Journalists. “It’s clear the political and military leadership is seeking to control the media message coming out of the conflict.”
According to White, “there’s strong criticism in Israel of the Arab reports coming out of Gaza, which are dismissed as propagandistic. But you only get out of that trap by ensuring as much information coming out as possible. More information will always be closer to the truth than less.”
Not so, said Prof. Richard Landes, who researches media narratives. Already, he charged, the Western media are showing they are “complying with the image [coming out of Gaza], which is governed by Hamas.”
As examples, Landes cited the reports of a humanitarian crisis in Gazan hospitals.
“The Egyptian border right now is packed with doctors and tons of medical supplies that Hamas is refusing to let in. This is mentioned briefly, but then the report switches to a Hamas representative saying they don’t have medical supplies,” he said.
According to Landes, “the framing story is that the Israeli Goliath is pummeling the poor Palestinian David. Anything that doesn’t fit this story, like the medical supplies on the Egyptian border or the shooting of Fatah [activists] by Hamas [gunmen], isn’t getting out. It’s inexcusable for the media to repeat Palestinian claims as fact.”
Nor does Israel feel the need to respond to the complaints of the foreign media. The Post has learned that Israeli officials continue to be satisfied with the current coverage of the conflict.
“It is obvious that the army is still operating according to its original plan, the international community is still giving us the space to conduct the campaign, and our hasbara efforts are doing very well,” said former ambassador to the UN Dan Gillerman, who has been given an official spokesman role for the Gaza offensive.
Meanwhile, non-official observers of the coverage argue the international media has not done enough to stay objective in the conflict.
For example, the Israeli watchdog group NGO Monitor has noted that one of the foreign media’s favorite Gaza-based interviewees, Norwegian physician Mads Gilbert, is a man with an extremist political past.
Gilbert has been quoted widely, including in a Times of London article where he told friends by SMS, “We are wading in death, blood and amputees. Many children. A pregnant woman. I have never experienced anything so terrible.”
Gilbert also used a BBC interview from Gaza’s Shifa Hospital to cite casualty statistics that he said proved the IDF was deliberately targeting civilians.
According to NGO Monitor, however, Gilbert’s past is indicative of “ideological extremism,” such as when he expressed support for the September 11 attacks on the United States in a 2001 interview in Norway’s Dagbladet newspaper.
In the interview, he argued that “the oppressed also have a moral right to attack the USA with any weapon they can come up with,” adding specifically that he supported the terror attack “within the context which I have mentioned.”
Gilbert was also a candidate for local government in 2007 for the Norwegian Red Party, an outgrowth of the radical Norwegian Workers’ Communist Party.
An Israeli government official also told the Post that “there is no way [Gilbert] could have personal access to the kind of statistics he cited. He got them from the Gaza Health Ministry, which is controlled by Hamas. That raises the question: To what extent is he a willing or unwilling mouthpiece for Hamas?”
The official protested that media outlets were routinely “using European aid workers as ostensibly objective witnesses. It smells like a setup when they talk about all the casualties being civilian.”
Another example is the France 2 television broadcast of a false report showing dead toddlers allegedly killed in the Gaza fighting. The amateur video of the dead toddlers being laid out on a white sheet was actually shot after an accidental explosion of a Hamas ammunition truck on parade in Gaza in September 2005.
France 2, which apologized Monday for the erroneous report, was also the network that broadcast, unchecked, a September 2000 report of the IDF shooting death of 12-year-old Palestinian boy Muhammad al-Dura. That report, too, which relied entirely on Palestinian sources, has been questioned, with a French court ruling the concern over its veracity was legitimate.
Etienne Leenhardt, the joint director responsible for investigative reports at France 2, apologized to the Le Post news blogger site, which caught the false report, for “an error on our part.”
“The person who prepared the topic went too fast,” he said. “It reminds us that we must be very attentive on verifying sources.”
“I AM NOT SO SURE THAT THE ERRORS OF WORLD OPINION ARE SO MUCH TO BE PREFERRED TO THE ERRORS OF ISRAEL”
(Daniel Finkelstein, an associate editor of the Times of London, is a longtime subscriber to this list.)
Israel acts because the world won’t defend it
The scenes from Gaza are heartbreaking. But the whole conflict could be avoided if the Palestinians said one small thing
By Daniel Finkelstein
The Times
January 7, 2009
It was strictly forbidden to have a notebook in Belsen, but my Aunt Ruth had one anyway. Just a little pocket diary – an appointment book with one of those tiny pencils. And in it, in the autumn of 1944, she noted that Anne Frank and Anne’s sister, Ruth’s schoolfriend Margot, had arrived in the concentration camp.
My mother and my aunt had been watching through the camp wire when the Franks arrived. Mum remembers it well, because they had been excited to spot girls they knew from the old days in Amsterdam. They had played in the same streets, been to the same schools and Ruth and Margot attended Hebrew classes together. The pair had once been pressed into service to act as bridesmaids, when a secretive Jewish wedding had taken place at the synagogue during their lesson time.
But Ruth and Margot did not grow up together. Because while Ruth and my mother lived, Margot and Anne never left Belsen. They died of typhus.
I am telling you this story because I want you to understand Israel. Not to agree with all it does, not to keep quiet when you want to protest against its actions, not to side with it always, merely to understand Israel.
There are two things about the tale that help to provide insight. The first is that all these things, the gas chambers, the concentration camps, the attempt to wipe Jews from the face of the Earth, they aren’t ancient history, and they aren’t fable. They happened to real people and they happened in our lifetime. Anne and Margot Frank were just children to my aunt and my mother; they weren’t icons, or symbols of anything.
The second is that world opinion weeps now for Anne Frank. But world opinion did not save her.
The origin of the state of Israel is not religion or nationalism, it is the experience of oppression and murder, the fear of total annihilation and the bitter conclusion that world opinion could not be relied upon to protect the Jews.
Israel was the idea of a journalist. Theodor Herzl was the Paris correspondent of the Neue Freie Presse when he witnessed anti-Semitic rioting against the Jewish army captain Alfred Dreyfus who had been falsely accused of espionage. Herzl was then among the small corps of journalists who in 1895 witnessed the famous ceremony of disgrace in which Dreyfus was stripped of his epaulettes.
The experience led Herzl to abandon his belief in assimilation. He became convinced that Jews would only be safe if they had their own national home. Herzl became the first leader of modern Zionism. For many years many Jews resisted Herzl’s conclusion. My grandfather was among them. But the experience of Jews all over the world in the first half of the 20th century – not just in Europe but in the Middle East too – rather bore out Herzl.
So when Israel is urged to respect world opinion and put its faith in the international community the point is rather being missed. The very idea of Israel is a rejection of this option. Israel only exists because Jews do not feel safe as the wards of world opinion. Zionism, that word that is so abused, so reviled, is founded on a determination that, at the end of the day, somehow the Jews will defend themselves and their fellow Jews from destruction. If world opinion was enough, there would be no Israel.
The poverty and the death and the despair among the Palestinians in Gaza moves me to tears. How can it not? Who can see pictures of children in a war zone or a slum street and not be angry and bewildered and driven to protest? And what is so appalling is that it is so unnecessary. For there can be peace and prosperity at the smallest of prices. The Palestinians need only say that they will allow Israel to exist in peace. They need only say this tiny thing, and mean it, and there is pretty much nothing they cannot have.
Yet they will not say it. And they will not mean it. For they do not want the Jews. Again and again – again and again – the Palestinians have been offered a nation state in a divided Palestine. And again and again they have turned the offer down, for it has always been more important to drive out the Jews than to have a Palestinian state. It is difficult sometimes to avoid the feeling that Hamas and Hezbollah don’t want to kill Jews because they hate Israel. They hate Israel because they want to kill Jews.
There cannot be peace until this changes. For Israel will not rely on airy guarantees and international gestures to defend it. At its very core, it will not. It will lay down its arms when the Jews are safe, but it will not do it until they are.
And if you reflect on it, doesn’t recent experience bear this out? Just as Herzl was borne out? A year or so back I met a teacher while I was on holiday and fell to talking with him about Israel. He was a nice man and all he wanted was for fighting to stop and to end the suffering of children. And he had a question for me.
Why, he asked, doesn’t Israel offer to give back the West Bank and Gaza? Why doesn’t it just let the Palestinians have a state there? If the Palestinians turned it down, he said, then at least liberal opinion would be on Israel’s side and would rally to its assistance.
So I patiently explained to this kind, good man that Israel had, at Camp David in 2000, made precisely this offer and that it had been rejected out of hand by Yassir Arafat, not even used as the basis for negotiation. I told him that Israel was no longer in Gaza, having withdrawn unilaterally and taken the settlers with it. The Palestinians had greeted this movement with suicide bombs and rockets. Yet the teacher, with all his compassion, wasn’t even aware of all this. And liberal opinion? Sad to relate, my new friend’s faith in it was misplaced. It has turned strongly against Israel.
Israel has made many mistakes. It has acted too aggressively on some occasions, has been too defensive on others. The country hasn’t always respected the human rights of its enemies as it should have done. What nation under such a threat would have avoided all errors?
But you know what? As Iran gets a nuclear weapon and so the potential for another Holocaust against the Jews and world opinion does nothing, I am not so sure that the errors of world opinion are so much to be preferred to the errors of Israel.
* How many missiles fired per day from Mexico into America would be an acceptable number?
* Would any other country put up with missiles raining down on its population year after year as Israel has done?
* The Guardian warns Barack Obama
* The Arab world’s most prominent movie star shocks fans as he says Israel is in the right
[This is a further dispatch on the ongoing Israel-Hamas confrontation. Previous dispatches can be read here.]
CONTENTS
1. Hamas kills, knee-caps its political opponents
2. Hamas accuses senior Palestinian aides of spying for Israelis
3. The quality of Israeli intelligence
4. Hamas attacks the Arab League stance as “pathetic”
5. Many in the international community, Arab world quietly rooting for Israel
6. Dutch PM makes statement sympathetic to Israel
7. Czech EU presidency: Israel ground op in Gaza “defensive not offensive”
8. Arnold Schwarzenegger: Israel has right to defend itself
9. Peres: Hamas must stop using children and hospital patients as human shields
10. “Your opinion is irrelevant”
11. Annihilation of terrorists; no one protested (No Jews involved)
12. Extreme left Israeli academic tells Germans: “Israel murdered 400,000 Palestinians last week”
13. Bernard Henri-Levy among Jews “listed for assassination” by Islamist group
14. IDF: Rocket that hit Beersheba school made in China
15. The Guardian warns Barack Obama
16. “Moral Clarity in Gaza” (By Charles Krauthammer, Washington Post, Jan. 2, 2009)
17. “Dear anti-war protestors, your opinion is irrelevant” (Ynet, Jan. 4, 2009)
18. “Hamas missiles must stop” (By Leonard Cole, Jan. 1, 2009)
[All notes below by Tom Gross]
HAMAS KILLS, KNEE-CAPS ITS POLITICAL OPPONENTS
Several papers, including The New York Times and The Washington Post, have reported that among the “civilian dead” in Gaza in recent days are Fatah supporters executed by Hamas in hospitals, schools and other locations. (Unsurprisingly anti-Israel media in Britain, France and elsewhere have misled readers and viewers to believe they are part of a death toll Israel is responsible for.)
HAMAS’S IDEA OF MEDICAL TREATMENT
For example, here buried in one Washington Post report from Gaza is the following: “On Sunday, doctors said, men believed to be Hamas fighters grabbed a patient, accusing him of being an Israeli collaborator. The gunmen shot him dead. ‘They took revenge,’ Khalaf said.”
And this New York Times report, for instance, mentions Hamas killed six people in one Gaza hospital alone in a 24-hour period:
“Armed Hamas militants in civilian clothes roamed the halls. Asked their function, they said it was to provide security. But there was internal bloodletting under way. In the fourth-floor orthopaedic section, a woman in her late 20s asked a militant to let her see Saleh Hajoj, her 32-year-old husband. She was turned away and left the hospital. Fifteen minutes later, Mr. Hajoj was carried out by young men pretending to transfer him to another ward. As he lay on the stretcher, he was shot in the left side of the head. Mr. Hajoj, like five others killed at the hospital this way in 24 hours, was accused of collaboration with Israel.” (This is catch-all excuse Hamas uses to justify the murder of all those who dare voice public criticism of it.)
Khaled Abu Toameh, chief Palestinian correspondent for The Jerusalem Post, who is himself a Palestinian (and is a longtime subscriber to this email list), and who has excellent sources in Gaza, reports that on Saturday and Sunday alone, Hamas executed 35 Fatah activists and shot around another 75 in the legs. Others had their hands broken or were placed under house arrest.
One example is that of Wisam Abu Jalhoum, a Fatah activist from the Jabalya refugee camp in Gaza, who was shot in the legs by Hamas militiamen for allegedly expressing joy over Israeli air strikes on Hamas targets.
Fahmi Za’arir, a Fatah spokesman, named two of the Fatah leaders in Gaza “executed” by Hamas on Saturday as Nasser Muhana and Saher al-Silawi.
Hamas seized the Gaza Strip from President Mahmoud Abbas’s Fatah forces in a bloody coup in June 2007 in which 400 Palestinians were brutally killed by Hamas, including people who were handcuffed and then thrown off Gaza high rises.
Hamas leaders fear Fatah members will exploit the current IDF operation to regain control of the Gaza Strip.
HAMAS ACCUSES SENIOR PALESTINIAN AIDES OF SPYING FOR ISRAELIS
In an interview broadcast on al-Jazeera, the pan-Arab satellite television station based in Qatar, Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum accused senior aides of the Palestinian President, Mahmoud Abbas, of spying for Israel. The charge of spying has also been made on Hamas’s website. It was angrily denied by Fatah leaders.
Hamas accuses Abbas of ordering members of Fatah in Gaza to gather intelligence on the whereabouts of Hamas leaders to pass to Israel and to help give the Israeli Air force pinpoint targets for them to attack in Gaza.
THE QUALITY OF ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE
The New York Times acknowledges that Israel has been remarkable in its accuracy.
For example, the Times writes:
Muhammad al-Zarb said that the Israelis somehow seemed to know which tunnels were commercial and which were run by Hamas, and that they seemed to be selective in their bombing. “If someone has a tunnel for Chipsy, it seems O.K.,” he said. “When a Hamas guy has a tunnel for weapons, they bomb it.”
HAMAS ATTACKS THE ARAB LEAGUE STANCE AS “PATHETIC”
Egypt’s foreign minister Aboul Gheit has again criticized Hamas and said that Hamas must stop firing rockets at Israel after any truce deal.
Saudi Arabia is also becoming more openly critical of Hamas for provoking Israel by its incessant rocket fire on Israeli civilians, and for not returning to national unity talks with its rival Fatah.
“This terrible massacre would not have happened if the Palestinian people were united behind one leadership,” Saudi foreign minister, Prince Saud al-Faisal said. “Your Arab brothers cannot extend to you the hand of real help, if you do not extend the hand of affection to each other,” he added, urging Hamas and Fatah to form a national unity government.
A furious Hamas attacked the Arab League stance as “pathetic”.
Rahman Abdul Al-Rashed, the general manager of Al-Arabiya television, has also publicly blamed Hamas for the crisis.
***
Unlike most Western TV networks who give Palestinian spokespeople free rein to spread their propaganda, some Fox News anchors actually call them on it. Watch here, for example.
MANY IN THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY, ARAB WORLD QUIETLY ROOTING FOR ISRAEL
While the extreme left are becoming increasingly hysterical in their denunciations of Israel, some falling into outright anti-Semitism and Holocaust revisionism, mainstream international opinion appears not to be nearly as critical towards Israel as it has been in recent years. This is perhaps because it is becoming more widely realized that Islamic fundamentalism is a threat to many parts of the world, not just to Israel, and also because Israel did what the world wanted – remove all traces of Jewish life from Gaza – and yet this only led to a sharp increase in rocket attacks on Israeli civilians from Gaza.
Many, if not most, Arab governments are quietly supporting Israel, so fearful are they of an Islamic proxy Iranian state being set up in their midst.
Although European TV networks and news websites barely mention this in their countless hours of reporting, Fatah, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, the government of Lebanon and many others are rooting for Israel to destroy Hamas, whom they loathe and fear.
Obviously they are not happy that Palestinian civilians have also died, any more than Israel is happy about it.
Israel is a liberal democracy so of course it can’t behave in a ruthless way like so many other countries have – Russia, Algeria, Burma or Syria, for example – or even in as heavy-handed a way as big powers like Britain, France and America have.
***
The Arab world’s most prominent comedian and movie star, Egyptian actor Adel Imam, has shocked many of his fans by expressing understanding for Israel’s military operation in the Gaza Strip.
DUTCH PM MAKES STATEMENT SYMPATHETIC TO ISRAEL
While British and French politicians, from both government and opposition parties, continue to make ignorant statements about Israel, based largely on the misleading information they are getting about the conflict from their own media*, other European politicians are more understanding of Israel’s position.
For example, Dutch Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende said yesterday that Israel’s offensive against Gaza can’t be condemned as long as Hamas continues firing rockets.
“Condemning Israel is pointless because both parties have to be addressed,” he said in an interview with Dutch television. “As long as the rocket attacks continue, Israel will always say ‘we cannot accept this’, and I understand that.”
“It is always regrettable when there are civilian casualties. But at the same time, I see Hamas continuously firing rockets on Israel,” Balkenende added.
Yesterday Hamas launched another 45 rockets into Israel.
Another convoy of 80 trucks carrying humanitarian supplies was allowed by Israel to enter the Gaza Strip this morning.
***
A NOTE ON THE BRITISH MEDIA
* I should point out there are a few British correspondents, such as Tim Marshall of Sky News, who are professional, well-informed and able to explain fairly both the Israeli and Palestinian positions. But others, such as the BBC anchor who said Hamas rockets were only hitting “Israeli border villages,” and Jon Snow of Channel 4 – who I also criticized in my recent Wall Street Journal article on the Mumbai terror attacks, and who said a couple of days ago that Israel was “lucky to have Sderot to engender sympathy” – simply don’t deserve to be employed as news reporters.)
This morning’s (London) Times seems to me particularly one-sided against Israel – and I don’t just mean because they have a guest column by Rabbi Michael Lerner.
CZECH EU PRESIDENCY: ISRAEL GROUND OP IN GAZA “DEFENSIVE NOT OFFENSIVE”
As mentioned in the last dispatch, countries of what Donald Rumsfeld famously termed the “new Europe” – who understand the threat of the totalitarian ideology that Hamas adheres to – are much more sympathetic to Israel than the antiquated elites of Western Europe.
The Czech Republic, which assumed the European Union presidency on January 1, issued a statement on Saturday saying that the Israeli ground offensive in Gaza was a “defensive, not offensive” action.
Czech Foreign Minister Karel Schwarzenberg is a long time subscriber to this email list. (Following the last dispatch, some people wrote asking me if he is Jewish. He is not. His family was one of the most prominent aristocratic Catholic families of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.)
France has strongly criticized the Czech-EU statement.
***
In Germany, Chancellor Angela Merkel’s strong support of Israel has prompted a rising number of attacks from her coalition partner, the Social Democratic Party (SPD), as well as the Free Democratic Party (FDP) and the Left Party.
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER: ISRAEL HAS RIGHT TO DEFEND ITSELF
Israel is also receiving statements of support from elsewhere. For example, California Governor (and former film star) Arnold Schwarzenegger yesterday expressed support for its ground operation in Gaza.
Schwarzenegger said: “Every nation has the right to defend itself against terrorism and cold-blooded attacks on its people. Israel is no different and is right to defend itself against the unceasing violence of rocket attacks launched by Hamas.”
U.S. President George W. Bush said that there is no point in having another “one-way ceasefire” that Hamas continually violates with its rocket fire and that the citizens of Israel deserve a real ceasefire.
PERES: HAMAS MUST STOP USING CHILDREN AND HOSPITAL PATIENTS AS HUMAN SHIELDS
Israeli President Shimon Peres has said that Israel’s operation was fully morally justified. He also called on Hamas to stop using children and hospital patients as human shields.
Below, I attach a piece by Charles Krauthammer that takes up this theme. It is well worth reading in full, but for those with limited time, here are some extracts. Krauthammer says:
Some geopolitical conflicts are morally complicated. The Israel-Gaza war is not. It possesses a moral clarity not only rare but excruciating.
Israel is so scrupulous about civilian life that, risking the element of surprise, it contacts enemy noncombatants in advance to warn them of approaching danger. Hamas, which started this conflict with unrelenting rocket and mortar attacks on unarmed Israelis – 6,464 launched from Gaza in the past three years – deliberately places its weapons in and near the homes of its own people.
Krauthammer continues: For Hamas, the only thing more prized than dead Jews are dead Palestinians. The religion of Jew-murder and self-martyrdom is ubiquitous. And deeply perverse, such as the Hamas TV children’s program in which an adorable live-action Palestinian Mickey Mouse is beaten to death by an Israeli (then replaced by his more militant cousin, Nahoul the Bee, who vows to continue on Mickey’s path to martyrdom).
At war today in Gaza, one combatant is committed to causing the most civilian pain and suffering on both sides. The other combatant is committed to saving as many lives as possible – also on both sides.
… The grievance? It cannot be occupation, military control or settlers. They were all removed in September 2005. There’s only one grievance and Hamas is open about it. Israel’s very existence.
Nor does Hamas conceal its strategy. Provoke conflict. Wait for the inevitable civilian casualties. Bring down the world’s opprobrium on Israel. Force it into an untenable cease-fire – exactly as happened in Lebanon. Then, as in Lebanon, rearm, rebuild and mobilize for the next round. Perpetual war. Since its raison d’etre is the eradication of Israel, there are only two possible outcomes: the defeat of Hamas or the extinction of Israel.
“YOUR OPINION IS IRRELEVANT”
I also attach a piece, “Dear anti-war protestors, your opinion is irrelevant,” by Israeli writer Hanoch Daum on the English language website of Yediot Ahronot, Israel’s highest circulation newspaper.
I attach this piece not because it has any particular literary brilliance, but because it sums up the views of the vast majority in Israel.
I also attach a piece by Leonard Cole, who writes “How many missiles fired per week from Mexico into southern California are an acceptable number? Fired from North Korea into eastern Russia? From the Hamas-controlled Gaza strip into southern Israel? The answer, of course, is none. Yet for most weeks since the Israelis withdrew entirely from Gaza in 2005, Palestinian rockets kept coming.”
“… Unlike the Palestinians who cheered when their missiles hit residences or schools, Israel has tried scrupulously to avoid hitting non-belligerent sites. But as the Israelis bombed, Hamas-fired missiles continued to land in Israeli cities. Strangely, even as the rockets kept coming, critics accused Israel of using disproportionate force to try to end their firing.”
ANNIHILATION OF TERRORISTS; NO ONE PROTESTED (NO JEWS INVOLVED)
Prof. Steven Plaut of Haifa University, who is a subscriber to this list, emails me the following:
The jets bombed the bejeebers out of them. The ground forces invaded. They at long last suppressed the terrorists, who had conducted a long campaign of suicide bombing and planting bombs, and put an end to any notion that the terrorists and their sponsors would be granted their own state.
Many civilians were killed and wounded, yet not a single protest was made against the invasion anywhere. I am of course referring to the conquest by the army of Sri Lanka over the past few days of the last hold-out city of the Tamil independence rebels.
Kilinochchi was the last town held by the Tamil “Tiger” Rebels, considered to be a terrorist group by the United States. With it fell the last Tamil hope of setting up an independent state or even of getting autonomy inside Sri Lanka. The Tamils have their own state inside India but were not satisfied with that manifestation of “self-determination.” Kilinochchi, 579 kilometers north of Sri Lanka’s capital Colombo, was until recent months the center of political power for the rebels.
Meanwhile not a single Solidarity-with-the-Tamil-Tigers protest has been organized on a single Western campus or in a single downtown square. Mobs and “academics” have not taken to the streets to demand an end to the war of aggression against the Tamils. Leftist web sites have not proclaimed every injury of a Tamil civilian to be a Nazi-like war crime and an act of genocide.
Eurocrats have not pontificated about how the Sri Lankan response to the terror was out of proportion. The International Solidarity Movement has not sent in protesters from the West to try to defend the terrorists. Communists and fellow travelers have not organized flotillas of boats carrying aid to the terrorists. Israeli politicians have not lectured the Sinhalese of Sri Lanka about how the whole problem is that they are insensitive to the needs of the “Other.”
None have proposed dividing Colombo and handing over half to the Tamils. Virtually no one knows that 65,000 civilians have died in the fighting and the media have no interest in covering the story.
EXTREME LEFT ISRAELI ACADEMIC TELLS GERMANS: “ISRAEL MURDERED 400,000 PALESTINIANS LAST WEEK”
Organizations responsible for monitoring and combating anti-Semitism in Germany, have criticized state-owned Deutschlandradio for its interview on Friday with extreme-leftist Israeli historian and sociologist Prof. Moshe Zuckermann of Tel Aviv University. Zuckermann told a widely-heard radio program that Israel had killed 400,000 Palestinians last week.
The radio interviewer, Birgit Kolkmann, has also been criticized for failing to interrupt or counter Zuckermann.
Likewise the BBC World service has been criticized for allowing Palestinian spokespeople to claim that Israel is “starving” Palestinians and doing “exactly” what the Nazis did.
Zuckermann also writes for the extreme anti-Israel German paper Junge Welt.
I don’t understand why Tel Aviv University continues to employ Zuckermann to teach young people. He must know the deep wish of so many Germans and Austrians to hear that the Jews are no better than the Nazis.
8,000 protesters marched in Berlin and 10,000 in Frankfurt on Saturday, claiming Israel was carrying out “a second Holocaust”
Columnist Ari Shavit of Ha’aretz wrote of Zuckerman and other fellow travelers yesterday: “There is no call for hating the Israel-hating Israelis. At the end of the day, their position is a pathetic one. Their self-righteousness is not at all righteous, and their moralizing has no morality.”
BERNARD HENRI-LEVY AMONG JEWS “LISTED FOR ASSASSINATION” BY ISLAMIST GROUP
The leading French philosopher Bernard Henri-Levy was among those on a list of leading French and Belgian Jews drawn up for assassination by a Belgium-based Islamist group, the Belgian daily La Derniere Heure reports.
According to the paper, Belgian authorities found the list during a raid on homes of local Muslim community members last November.
ROCKET THAT HIT BEERSHEBA SCHOOL MADE IN CHINA
An Israeli army intelligence officer said the rocket that struck a school in Beersheba on Wednesday was manufactured in China, and smuggled into Gaza after the Sinai border wall was blown up by Hamas in January. The Chinese-made weapons are heavier than the Qassam and can potentially cause much greater damage. They are even more sophisticated than the Iranian-made Grad-model Katyusha that is also in Hamas’s arsenal. The Chinese rocket contains metal pellets that can spread out across a radius of up to 100 meters (about 328 feet) from the point of impact.
The Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) believes these Chinese-made weapons were delivered to Yemen, Eritrea and Sudan, then bought by Hamas and smuggled through Egypt into Gaza.
THE GUARDIAN WARNS BARACK OBAMA
The British newspaper The Guardian is warning U.S. President-elect Barack Obama that his silence regarding Israel’s incursion into the Gaza Strip is destroying his “chances of making a fresh start in U.S. relations with the Muslim world.” The paper claims that “evidence is mounting” that Obama is “already losing ground among key Arab and Muslim audiences” because of his failure to speak out against Israel. (The Guardian doesn’t explain what this “evidence” is.)
His silence, the paper alleges, is being interpreted as sign of a continuation of the policies of President Bush. The paper terms the silence of Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden “uncharacteristic.” The Guardian and others charge that Obama defers to Bush as the “only president” when it suits him, but has spoken out on international issues, and economic issues, “when it suits him.”
What The Guardian doesn’t seem to understand is that Obama’s Iran diplomacy needs a Hamas defeat. Obama knows (as does Bush) that for America’s intended Iran diplomacy to have any chance of working – for the U.S. to be able to press the mullahs to back down on their nuclear project without having to resort to military force – Tehran has to be shown that its regional militarism has a cost.
[All notes above by Tom Gross]
FULL ARTICLES
“FOR HAMAS, THE ONLY THING MORE PRIZED THAN DEAD JEWS ARE DEAD PALESTINIANS”
Moral Clarity in Gaza
By Charles Krauthammer
Washington Post
January 2, 2009
Late Saturday, thousands of Gazans received Arabic-language cell-phone messages from the Israeli military, urging them to leave homes where militants might have stashed weapons.
-- Associated Press, Dec. 27
Some geopolitical conflicts are morally complicated. The Israel-Gaza war is not. It possesses a moral clarity not only rare but excruciating.
Israel is so scrupulous about civilian life that, risking the element of surprise, it contacts enemy noncombatants in advance to warn them of approaching danger. Hamas, which started this conflict with unrelenting rocket and mortar attacks on unarmed Israelis – 6,464 launched from Gaza in the past three years – deliberately places its weapons in and near the homes of its own people.
This has two purposes. First, counting on the moral scrupulousness of Israel, Hamas figures civilian proximity might help protect at least part of its arsenal. Second, knowing that Israelis have new precision weapons that may allow them to attack nonetheless, Hamas hopes that inevitable collateral damage – or, if it is really fortunate, an errant Israeli bomb – will kill large numbers of its own people for which, of course, the world will blame Israel.
For Hamas, the only thing more prized than dead Jews are dead Palestinians. The religion of Jew-murder and self-martyrdom is ubiquitous. And deeply perverse, such as the Hamas TV children’s program in which an adorable live-action Palestinian Mickey Mouse is beaten to death by an Israeli (then replaced by his more militant cousin, Nahoul the Bee, who vows to continue on Mickey’s path to martyrdom).
At war today in Gaza, one combatant is committed to causing the most civilian pain and suffering on both sides. The other combatant is committed to saving as many lives as possible – also on both sides. It’s a recurring theme. Israel gave similar warnings to Southern Lebanese villagers before attacking Hezbollah in the Lebanon war of 2006. The Israelis did this knowing it would lose for them the element of surprise and cost the lives of their own soldiers.
That is the asymmetry of means between Hamas and Israel. But there is equal clarity regarding the asymmetry of ends. Israel has but a single objective in Gaza – peace: the calm, open, normal relations it offered Gaza when it withdrew in 2005. Doing something never done by the Turkish, British, Egyptian and Jordanian rulers of Palestine, the Israelis gave the Palestinians their first sovereign territory ever in Gaza.
What ensued? This is not ancient history. Did the Palestinians begin building the state that is supposedly their great national aim? No. No roads, no industry, no courts, no civil society at all. The flourishing greenhouses that Israel left behind for the Palestinians were destroyed and abandoned. Instead, Gaza’s Iranian-sponsored rulers have devoted all their resources to turning it into a terror base – importing weapons, training terrorists, building tunnels with which to kidnap Israelis on the other side. And of course firing rockets unceasingly.
The grievance? It cannot be occupation, military control or settlers. They were all removed in September 2005. There’s only one grievance and Hamas is open about it. Israel’s very existence.
Nor does Hamas conceal its strategy. Provoke conflict. Wait for the inevitable civilian casualties. Bring down the world’s opprobrium on Israel. Force it into an untenable cease-fire – exactly as happened in Lebanon. Then, as in Lebanon, rearm, rebuild and mobilize for the next round. Perpetual war. Since its raison d’etre is the eradication of Israel, there are only two possible outcomes: the defeat of Hamas or the extinction of Israel.
Israel’s only response is to try to do what it failed to do after the Gaza withdrawal. The unpardonable strategic error of its architect, Ariel Sharon, was not the withdrawal itself but the failure to immediately establish a deterrence regime under which no violence would be tolerated after the removal of any and all Israeli presence – the ostensible justification for previous Palestinian attacks. Instead, Israel allowed unceasing rocket fire, implicitly acquiescing to a state of active war and indiscriminate terror.
Hamas’s rejection of an extension of its often-violated six-month cease-fire (during which the rockets never stopped, just were less frequent) gave Israel a rare opportunity to establish the norm it should have insisted upon three years ago: no rockets, no mortar fire, no kidnapping, no acts of war. As the U.S. government has officially stated: a sustainable and enduring cease-fire. If this fighting ends with anything less than that, Israel will have lost yet another war. The question is whether Israel still retains the nerve – and the moral self-assurance – to win.
“WITH ALL DUE RESPECT…”
Dear anti-war protestors, your opinion is irrelevant
By Hanoch Daum
Ynet (website of Yediot Ahronot)
January 4, 2009
Dear protestors, Arab Israelis, and citizens of the world:
We are in favor of the democratic right of every person to rally in favor whatever he or she feel like, even if we are talking about Israeli citizens demonstrating against their country at a time of war.
After all, we no longer have too many expectations of the Arab-Israeli leadership, headed by Knesset Member Muhammad Barakeh.
Yet nonetheless, and with all due respect, we wish to tell you something at this time: Your views do not really make a difference to us right now. At this moment, when we are fighting for the wellbeing of southern residents, the level of support we receive from you does not matter to us too much. It is irrelevant.
The important thing is that tens of thousands of Israeli citizens will be able to live a normative life; the kind of life where no Grad or any other kind of rocket would be landing on their heads in the middle of the street.
This may sound a little odd, yet if in order to secure this kind of normative life we need to turn the lives of Gaza residents into hell, then with great regret this is precisely what we shall be doing.
We would of course be happy to only hurt Hamas terrorists in surgical strikes, yet this is a little difficult to achieve when the terrorists are operating in the midst of the civilian population in Gaza.
You may be surprised about this, yet when it comes to a choice between the option of allowing southern Israel residents to continue being hurt and the option of hitting the terrorists with full force, while realizing that innocent civilians in Gaza will be hurt too along the way, we choose to side with our own citizens. How weird indeed.
Oh, yeah, I almost forgot something else: We already withdrew from the Gaza Strip. A long time ago. Perhaps you repressed this minor detail, yet we uprooted settlements, just the way you like it. We expelled Jews from their homes, in line with our own decision, just in order to get out of Gaza. We carried a brutal transfer to the residents of Gush Katif just to secure some peace and quiet.
So next time you ask us to evacuate settlements, ask yourselves what we’ll be getting in return.
WOULD ANY OTHER COUNTRY PUT UP WITH MISSILES RAINING DOWN ON ITS POPULATION?
Hamas missiles must stop
By Leonard Cole
NorthJersey.com
January 1, 2009
Unlike the Palestinians who cheered when their missiles hit residences or schools, Israel has tried scrupulously to avoid hitting non-belligerent sites.
How many missiles fired per week from Mexico into southern California are an acceptable number? Fired from North Korea into eastern Russia? From the Hamas-controlled Gaza strip into southern Israel? The answer, of course, is none. Yet for most weeks since the Israelis withdrew entirely from Gaza in 2005, Palestinian rockets kept coming.
During the years of assaults, a handful of Israelis were killed, though tens of thousands have been traumatized. Finally last week, after repeated warnings to end the attacks, Israelis began to heavily bomb Gazan missile launchers and other military and political targets.
Unlike the Palestinians who cheered when their missiles hit residences or schools, Israel has tried scrupulously to avoid hitting non-belligerent sites. But as the Israelis bombed, Hamas-fired missiles continued to land in Israeli cities. Strangely, even as the rockets kept coming, critics accused Israel of using disproportionate force to try to end their firing.
The Israeli action, which began on Dec. 27, has killed more than 300 Palestinians. As acknowledged by Hamas, most victims were police, security personnel or otherwise part of the rocket-force infrastructure. Innocent Palestinians were also killed, many because Hamas set up launching pads next to their homes. Still, the death of innocents must be a matter of sorrow for every person of conscience.
But failure to acknowledge the right of any country to stop rocket attacks against its homeland, as some have done, violates both common sense and civic morality.
To understand the contentious situation regarding Gaza requires some historical context. This sliver of land, about 25 miles long, lies between Israel and Egypt and is home to 1.4 million Palestinians. Like Israel and the area known now as the West Bank, Gaza was once part of the Palestine Mandate under British control.
In 1948, in accord with a U.N. resolution, the Jewish state of Israel was established. In 1967, Israel gained control of Gaza and the West Bank, territories that have since become a basis for negotiation toward a Palestinian state.
But the attacks from Gaza, now run by Hamas, have become an impediment to that end.
Israel is challenged not only by the murderous rocket assaults, but a cacophony of falsehoods about the intentions and effects of its response. Hamas spokesmen have described the Israeli actions as a “massacre,” and they have accused Israel of causing mass starvation. In fact, the Israeli bombardments have been directed at military targets and Hamas personnel, period.
Moreover, while engaged in a campaign to destroy the Hamas arsenals, Israel has simultaneously continued to permit the shipment of food and medicines into Gaza. Allegations of starvation are belied by news photographs and TV videos.
A DIFFERENT STORY
The images of Palestinian casualties as well as passersby, whether children or adults, invariably tell a different story. None of them are reduced to the skin and bones of starvation. Life surely has become more difficult for Gaza’s residents, but conditions are far short of a humanitarian crisis.
The emotional trauma of Palestinians as a result of Israeli bombardments may be no less than that suffered by Israeli victims of Palestinian rockets. But to make this observation does not mean equivalent responsibility for the havoc.
One of the most deceptive, though common descriptions of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is that both parties are caught in a “cycle of violence.”The implication is that the governing behavior in the conflict is tit-for-tat and that the Israelis and Palestinians are evenly responsible.
In fact, unless one believes, as does Hamas, that the existence of Israel is itself an unacceptable act of violence, the notion of equivalency evaporates. If one morning Hamas were to recognize Israel’s right to exist and end assaults against the Jewish state, the violence from both sides would be over before lunch.
UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and other respected leaders who have condemned Israel’s actions as disproportionate must explain further.
If three Palestinian rockets are launched into Israel, does proportion mean that an Israeli response must be limited to three rockets?
In the context of rocket and mortar attacks randomly fired across a national border, the proportionate response should be obvious to any fair-minded person: Whatever it takes to stop them.
President-elect Barack Obama said it well during a recent visit to Israel. If somebody were sending rockets into his house where his two daughters slept, he would do everything in his power to stop those attacks. Further, he said, he expected the Israelis to do the same.
* Prominent Saudi cleric who called for worldwide attacks on Israeli civilians arrested by the Saudi authorities
* Regional U.S. editorials side with Israel; say it “should finish the job”
This is a further dispatch concerning the ongoing Israel-Hamas confrontation. This dispatch contains some of the international reaction you are unlikely to hear on the BBC and other hopelessly biased media.
CONTENTS
1. “Nuke, nuke Israel… the Jews need a big oven”
2. Iran shuts newspaper for blaming Hamas for the conflict
3. Italian fashion store Benetton attacked by protesters in Iran
4. Danish police arrest man in shooting of Israelis
5. British telecom firm severs ties with Israeli counterparts
6. A reader writes
7. Czechs take over EU presidency, defend Israeli strikes
8. Merkel blasts Hamas for Middle East violence
9. Russia: Hamas must recognize Abbas’s rule
10. Saudi cleric arrested for calling for attacks on Israelis
11. Regional U.S. editorials side with Israel; say it “should finish the job”
12. Light item: Happy New Year!
[All notes below by Tom Gross]
“NUKE, NUKE ISRAEL… THE JEWS NEED A BIG OVEN”
Even in Fort Lauderdale, Florida…
“The Jews need a big oven” and “nuke, nuke Israel” scream pro-Hamas demonstrators.
***
There have been many protests elsewhere, including outside the White House. For example, on New Year’s Eve, a pro-Hamas mob marched on the Jewish neighborhood in the Belgium city of Antwerp, clashing with police. Cars, trams and buses were attacked. The Jewish neighborhood of the city remains under round the clock police guard.
***
One photo from a protest in Philadelphia.
***
Celebrity Roseanne Barr offers her perspectives re Israel/Gaza.
IRAN SHUTS NEWSPAPER FOR BLAMING HAMAS FOR THE CONFLICT
The Iranian government on Wednesday closed a leading reformist daily, Kargozaran, for publishing a statement by a student group that blamed Hamas for provoking the current conflict with Israel.
The paper said Hamas were “terrorists who cause the deaths of children and civilians by taking up position in kindergartens and hospitals.”
(This is a truth that would never be mentioned by certain Western journalists, like the BBC’s Senior Middle East correspondent Jeremy Bowen and CNN’s “Senior Correspondent in Jerusalem” Ben Wedeman. Both men are more anti-Israel than the liberal Iranian media.)
Kargozaran’s publisher Morteza Sajadian confirmed the paper’s closure and said the piece in question was a statement by a pro-reform student group, the “Office to Consolidate Unity.”
Sajadian apologized to the Iranian government for printing the statement and said he hoped the ban would be only temporary. Kargozaran editor Mehran Karami said he will try to convince the authorities that his newspaper remains anti-Zionist.
More in Persian here.
ITALIAN FASHION STORE BENETTON ATTACKED BY PROTESTERS IN IRAN
A branch of the Italian clothing chain Benetton was set on fire in Iran on Wednesday amid angry anti-Israel protests. The government-controlled Iranian daily Jomhuri Eslami said the shop, in Dowlat Street in the north of the capital, Tehran, was “linked with the Zionist network.”
Several Benetton stores have opened in the past two years in Iran, where global brands have largely been absent since the 1979 Islamic revolution.
Last year a group of prominent Iranian MPs protested against Benetton’s presence in the country, alleging that it was owned by a “Zionist millionaire” (the owner is not Jewish) and that its fashions were a bad influence on female consumers.
***
In Tehran protestors attempted to storm the Jordanian embassy yesterday, but were prevented from doing so by Iranian riot police. The Egyptian consulate in Aden, Yemen, was also attacked. Demonstrators say Jordan, Egypt and the Palestinian Authority are all aiding Israel against Hamas.
Here is American University Professor-turned Ahmadinejad advisor Hamid Mowlana stepping on the American flag yesterday.
DANISH POLICE ARREST MAN IN SHOOTING OF ISRAELIS
Danish police say they have arrested a Lebanese-born man on suspicion of shooting and wounding two Israelis at a shopping mall. A court yesterday ordered the suspect held for up to four weeks while police investigate.
On Wednesday, a gunman shot and wounded two young Israelis at a mall in the central Danish city of Odense. They were working at a Dead Sea Products stand in the mall when they were fired upon. A Danish daily reported that the gunman fled in a car after another Israeli emerged from a nearby barber shop and threw a chair in his direction.
One Israeli was shot in the arm and another in the leg. Both remain in hospital in stable condition.
Unsurprisingly in their countless hours of Gaza coverage, the BBC has avoided mentioning this or almost any other news that might engender sympathy for Israel.
BRITISH TELECOM FIRM SEVERS TIES WITH ISRAELI COUNTERPARTS
British telecommunications firm FreedomCall has terminated its cooperation with Israel’s MobileMax, citing the IDF’s operation in Gaza as the reason.
“We received an email from the British company informing us that it is severing all ties with us and any other Israeli company following Israel’s strike in Gaza,” said CEO Raanan Cohen.
Cohen called the British lack of understanding of Israel’s position “hopeless”. “I don’t intend to appeal to them or answer the letter,” he said.
MobileMax, established in 2004, produces a program providing cellular phones with inexpensive international service.
A READER WRITES
This email is from a subscriber to this list:
Am I the only one who has noticed that hundreds of Israeli tanks and thousands of Israeli soldiers are on Gaza’s border, but the Palestinians aren’t shooting at them? Instead they are only shooting at civilian areas in Israel. The media don’t seem to have noticed or commented on this strange fact.
That leads me to the question: Why should the Israeli air force be careful to avoid hitting civilian targets? The U.S was never so delicate. It flattened Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Berlin, Dresden, Hamburg and dozens of other cities in WWII, North Korean cities during that war, Hanoi during the Vietnam war, and parts of Baghdad at the start of the present war.
If Israeli civilians are attacked, why should enemy civilians not suffer? Above all, why are the media silent about this strange situation?
CZECHS TAKE OVER EU PRESIDENCY, DEFEND ISRAELI STRIKES
The Czech Republic, which took over the European Union’s presidency yesterday, is likely to try and shift the EU away from its pro-Palestinian bias.
Czech Foreign Minister Karel Schwarzenberg distanced himself from some of his EU colleagues who have criticized Israel and have called for an immediate ceasefire before Israel has had an opportunity to succeed in its operation against Hamas. He said Israel had the right to defend itself.
“Why am I one of the few that have expressed understanding for Israel? It is because I enjoy the luxury of telling the truth,” Schwarzenberg told the leading Czech daily Mlada Fronta Dnes in an interview, noting that the Czech Republic doesn’t have a large Muslim minority and is not infused with phony political correctness as are West European states.
France, which handed over the EU’s rotating presidency to Prague, has condemned Israel’s strikes.
Karel Schwarzenberg is a longtime subscriber to this email list.
MERKEL BLASTS HAMAS FOR MIDDLE EAST VIOLENCE
The leading German news magazine Der Spiegel reports that German Chancellor Angela Merkel said the blame for renewed violence in the Middle East can be pinned on Hamas. She said responsibility for the Israeli air offensive against Hamas in the Gaza Strip lies “clearly and exclusively” with Hamas, according to government spokesman Thomas Steg. A statement on the Chancellery website refers to Israel’s “legitimate right” to defend its people and territory.
Merkel has differed from British Prime Minister Gordon Brown who said “I am deeply concerned by Israel’s response,” and from French President Nicolas Sarkozy who condemned Israel for using what he called “disproportionate force.” Javier Solana, chief of foreign policy for the European Union, said “the current Israeli strikes are inflicting an unacceptable toll on Palestinian civilians.”
Meanwhile moderate Arab leaders continue to blame Hamas, not Israel.
RUSSIA: HAMAS MUST RECOGNIZE ABBAS’S RULE
Using stronger language than usual, Russian Foreign Minister Serge Lavrov told a Russian television network on Monday that Hamas must “realize responsibility before the Palestinian people for its acts, restore reconciliation and recognize Mahmoud Abbas’ legitimate powers.”
Lavrov added Russia was “convinced that there was no alternative to direct talks between Palestinians and Israelis,” and called for Lebanon and Syria to be part of those talks.
SAUDI CLERIC ARRESTED FOR CALLING FOR ATTACKS ON ISRAELIS
A prominent Saudi Arabian Muslim cleric who called for worldwide attacks on Israeli civilians in retaliation for the ongoing airstrikes on Hamas has been arrested by the Saudi authorities, Saudi media reported on Wednesday.
Sheikh Awad al-Qarni issued a fatwa on Monday for the “spilling of (Israeli) blood wherever they are.”
In the past few days al-Qarni’s fatwa has been widely discussed on Islamist internet sites, the al-Rasad newspaper reports.
REGIONAL U.S. EDITORIALS SIDE WITH ISRAEL; SAY IT “SHOULD FINISH THE JOB”
While some in the European media (and in major North American papers) continue to severely mislead their readers and viewers about what is actually happening in Gaza and southern Israel, many regional American editors appear to be more clear-sighted.
Among the headlines of editorials in the last couple of days:
* The Blood on Hamas’ Hands – Editorial (Dallas Morning News)
* Daily Rocket Attacks by Hamas Invited Israeli Military Response – Editorial (Miami Herald)
The paper writes: Israel is fulfilling the most elementary obligation of any government: to protect the lives of its people. This was the reason for the founding of the Jewish state in the first place. Hamas was founded not to win independence for the Palestinian people but to destroy Israel. Palestinians have a legitimate right to pursue the creation of an independent state, but not to seek the destruction of another country. Any outcome that is perceived as a victory for Hamas would be a victory for terrorism.
* Hamas Has Invited Its Own Destruction – Editorial (Detroit News)
The paper writes: Calls on Israel to immediately cease its pounding of Hamas targets in the Gaza Strip are misdirected. Hamas’ rockets are growing in range and sophistication, and soon will be able to strike targets deep inside Israel. That’s intolerable.
* Israel Finally Says: Enough – Editorial (Ottawa Citizen-Canada)
The paper writes: Hamas and other Islamist groups deliberately target Israeli civilians and celebrate when Jewish children die. Israel, responding in self-defense, seeks to minimize civilian casualties and grieves when Arab children get caught in the crossfire. There is no mystery to this asymmetry. Israel is a Western-style liberal democracy; Hamas is a fundamentalist, Iranian-backed Islamist group. We are in this mess because the national priority of Hamas, as always, is to hurt Jews rather than help Palestinians.
* Self-Defense – Editorial (Richmond Times-Dispatch)
The paper writes: Israel is acting in self-defense, as any country in its position would. If Gaza had not served as a launching pad for terrorism, then Israel would not have struck at the source.
* Poor Hamas? No! – Editorial (Pittsburgh Tribune-Review)
The paper writes: Hamas brought its woes upon itself. Now it’s paying the price.
* U.S. Should Support Israelis in Campaign Against Hamas – Editorial (The Oklahoman)
The paper writes: As Israel continues to respond to rocket attacks launched from Hamas-controlled Gaza, we offer some unsolicited advice to a fellow democracy and ally: Go all in. Finish the job.
LIGHT ITEM: HAPPY NEW YEAR!
I occasionally include lighter items to provide some respite for the often depressing items in these dispatches.
Here, “Uncle Jay” explains the news.
* “Imagine Churchill sending supplies into Berlin as a humanitarian gesture during the bombing of London”
* “Why not just redefine ‘holocaust’ to refer to deaths of terrorists in numbers under 400 to give greater credence to Hamas’s current claims?”
* “Israel’s crime isn’t striking back at terror, but demonstrating, year after year, that a country in the Middle East can be governed without resort to terror. Israel’s crime hasn’t been denying Arab rights, but insisting on human rights for women and minorities.”
This is one of three further dispatches concerning the ongoing Israel-Hamas confrontation. Two of the dispatches contain articles by others, and the third will have various observations and news items by myself.
CONTENTS
1. Israel’s crime
2. “The moral and intellectual bankruptcy of so many Western journalists”
3. Mumbai update: A further tragedy
4. “A series of appalling anti-Semitic statements”
5. “Give Hamas a fair chance to carry out suicide attacks!” (By Victor Davis Hanson)
6. “Israel’s response is disproportionate” (By Jonathan Mark, Dec. 30, 2008)
7. “Damned if they do, but Israel’s dead if they don’t” (By Ralph Peters, NY Post, Dec. 29, 2008)
8. “U.S. to contribute yet more money to Palestinians” (State Dept. Press release, Dec. 30, 2008)
ISRAEL’S CRIME
[Note by Tom Gross]
I attach three articles and some other items below.
I would in particular recommend reading in full the first two pieces, both of which deal with the issue of proportionality. The first is a tongue-in-cheek analysis by historian Victor Davis Hanson of Stanford University (who is a subscriber to this email list). The second, by Jonathan Mark, explains what a proportionate response by Israel to Hamas and those Gazans who support it, would actually look like.
In the third article below, military expert and retired Army Lt Col. Ralph Peters says that “Israel may have executed the most accurate wave of airstrikes in history, with a 15-to-1 terrorist-to-civilian kill ratio.
“… Israel’s crime isn’t striking back at terror, but demonstrating, year after year, that a country in the Middle East can be governed without resort to terror. Israel’s crime hasn’t been denying Arab rights, but insisting on human rights for women and minorities.
“Israel’s crime has been making democracy work where tyranny prevailed for 5,000 years. Israel’s crime has been survival against overwhelming odds, while legions of Arab nationalists, Islamist extremists and Western leftists want every Jew dead.
“But Israel’s greatest crime was to expose the global cult of victimhood, to prove that hard work, fortitude and courage could overcome even history’s grimmest disaster.”
“THE MORAL AND INTELLECTUAL BANKRUPTCY OF SO MANY WESTERN JOURNALISTS”
Commenting on Ralph Peter’s article, Jack Kelly says: “Israel gets little credit for either its military skill or its remarkable forbearance. Nothing better illustrates the moral and intellectual bankruptcy of so many Western journalists than the ritual condemnation of Israel for the accidental deaths of a few Palestinian civilians, and the near total absence of condemnation of Hamas for its repeated deliberate attacks on Israeli civilians.
Writing on the website of the British magazine The Spectator, Melanie Phillips says: “Those who scream ‘disproportionate’ think – grotesquely – that not enough Israelis have been killed. If anything has been ‘disproportionate,’ it’s been Israel’s refusal to take action during the years when its southern citizens have been terrorized by rockets and other missiles raining down on them from Gaza. No other country in the world would have sat on its hands for so long in such circumstances.”
UPDATES
MUMBAI UPDATE: A FURTHER TRAGEDY
Updating the dispatch “No, they weren’t ‘practitioners’” (Dec. 2, 2008)
On Tuesday (December 30), the elder child of last month’s Chabad Mumbai terror victims Rabbi Gavriel and Rivka Holtzberg died of long-term illness exacerbated by shock at the murder of his parents.
Dov Holtzberg, 4, was not in the Chabad Mumbai Jewish center when the terror attack occurred. His 2-year-old brother Moshe was saved from the terrorists by his Indian nanny. Dov was buried in Jerusalem yesterday next to his parents.
UPDATE: “A SERIES OF APPALLING ANTI-SEMITIC STATEMENTS”
Updating the dispatch New low for British media: Ahmadinejad invited to address UK on Christmas (Dec. 24, 2008):
The British government has now criticized publicly-owned British Channel 4 television for broadcasting an alternative Christmas Day message by Iranian dictator Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
A spokeswoman for the British foreign office said that the broadcast had caused offence around the world.
“President Ahmadinejad has during his time in office made a series of appalling anti-Semitic statements,” she said. “The British media are rightly free to make their own editorial choices, but this invitation will cause offence and bemusement not just at home but amongst friendly countries abroad.”
Channel 4 head of news and current affairs Dorothy Byrne defended her decision to invite Ahmadinejad to give the Christmas message.
-- Tom Gross
FULL ARTICLES
TAKE DOWN THAT SECURITY BARRIER!
Hamas aren’t being given a fair chance to carry out suicide attacks!
By Victor Davis Hanson
December 31, 2008
Here is how to leveling the playing field for the underdog Hamas:
1) Request that 50% of Israel’s air-to-ground missiles be duds to ensure greater proportionality.
2) Allow Hamas another 1,000 free rocket launches to see if they can catch up with the body count.
3) Have Israeli soldiers congregate in border barracks so that Hamas’s random rockets have a better chance of killing military personnel, to ensure it can claim at least a few military targets.
4) Redefine “holocaust” to refer to deaths of terrorists in numbers under 400 to give greater credence to Hamas’s current claims.
5) In the interest of fairness, allow Hamas to establish both the date that war is supposed to begin and the date when it must end.
6) Send Israeli military advisers to Hamas to improve the accuracy of their missiles.
7) Take down the barriers to return to Hamas a fair chance of getting suicide bombers back inside Israel.
HOW TO MAKE ISRAEL’S RESPONSE PROPORTIONATE
Israel’s response is disproportionate
By Jonathan Mark
December 30, 2008
I condemn Israel’s disproportionate attack on Hamas because, so far, it has only lasted four days and I would like to see a proportionate response that terrifies Hamas for seven years, the years that have filled Sderot and neighboring towns with nightmares, death, amputations and trauma coming from rockets and mortars fired from Gaza.
Perhaps a proportionate response would have Gaza’s leaders fearful of being killed every day for the next two years, as Gilad Shalit has been terrified of torture and death every day for the last two years in his solitary Gaza dungeon.
A proportionate response would have Hamas mothers and fathers as fearful for their children’s lives as Shalit’s mother and father have been fearful for Gilad’s life.
A proportionate response would have Gaza’s children crying for their mommies and daddies, the way at a Hamas pageant earlier in December a Palestinian actor dressed as Shalit got down on his knees, mock-begging in Hebrew for his Ima and Abba while the Gaza crowds laughed.
A proportionate response would so intimidate Hamas that they will grovel and, as a “gesture,” send cocoa and jam into Sderot, the way Israel has groveled in response to rockets from Hamas, sending cocoa and jam into Gaza. Imagine Churchill sending cocoa and jam into Berlin as a humanitarian gesture after – during – the bombing of London.
A proportionate response would be one that will convince Hamas there is no military solution, no solution but surrender. They can then call surrender a “peace process,” if they like, just as the mostly unanswered attacks on Jews have convinced some Jews that there is no military solution but surrender to any and all demands. They suggest a euthanasia by the euphemism of “peace process,” that Israel become what some are already planning to call “Canaan,” a non-Jewish state of all its citizens.
A proportionate response will convince Palestinians that if they insist that the starting point to peace negotiations is that no Jew be allowed to live on the West Bank, the proportionate response will be that Israel’s starting point in negotiations is that no Arab be allowed to live in Tel Aviv. Horrible to contemplate? Fine, let there be a proportionate negotiation.
A proportionate response to Hamas, one might gather from the European scolds, would be as if the United States, after Pearl Harbor, would bomb just a few Japanese fishing boats and call it a day, believing the war would have ended with that.
A proportionate response will begin to remind Jews that there is no peace process like victory, just as Israel’s decade of disproportionate restraint and self-doubt has convinced young Palestinians that their victory is inevitable, like Aryan youth in 1933 singing “Tomorrow Belongs To Me.”
Let it be said to Israelis and Jews everywhere, in the words of Churchill: “You have enemies? Good. It means you’ve stood up for something.” But remember: A war (and Hamas has repeatedly said this is war) is never won if you are disproportionately kind to someone who wants to destroy you and, failing in that, demands with indignation that you not destroy him.
When meeting that enemy, be proportionate.
“HOW LONG WILL IT BE UNTIL THE UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY PASSES A RESOLUTION CREATING AN INTERNATIONAL HOLOCAUST APPRECIATION DAY?”
Damned if they do, but Israel’s dead if they don’t
By Ralph Peters
New York Post
December 29, 2008
DEAD Jews aren’t news, but killing terrorists outrages global activists. On Saturday, Israel struck back powerfully against its tormentors. Now Israel’s the villain. Again.
How long will it be until the UN General Assembly passes a resolution creating an international Holocaust Appreciation Day?
Israel’s airstrikes against confirmed Hamas terrorist targets in the Gaza Strip were overdue, discriminating and skillful. So far, this retaliatory campaign has been a superb example of how to employ postmodern airpower.
Instead of bombing empty buildings in the dead of night in the hope of convincing bloodthirsty monsters to become peace-loving floral arrangers – the US Air Force version of “Shock and Awe” – the Israeli Defense Force aimed to kill terrorists.
Israel’s attack aircraft appear to have accomplished that part of the mission. As I write, some 300 terrorist dead have been reported in Gaza, while the propaganda-savvy information office of Hamas has struggled to prove that 20 civilians died.
Given the fact that Hamas adheres to the terrorist practice of locating command sites, arsenals and training facilities in heavily populated areas, the results suggest that the IDF – supported by first-rate intelligence work – may have executed the most accurate wave of airstrikes in history, with a 15-to-1 terrorist-to-civilian kill ratio.
The bad news is that it still won’t be enough. While Israel has delivered a painful blow against Hamas, it’s still not a paralyzing hit. The only way to neuter such a terror threat – even temporarily – is to go in on the ground and scour every room, basement and underground tunnel in a region.
That would mean high Israeli casualties and, of course, condemnation of Israel’s self-defense efforts by every self-righteous, corrupt and bigoted organization and government on earth, from Turtle Bay to Tehran.
What have been Israel’s “crimes?” Not “stealing Palestinian land,” but making that land productive, while exposing the incompetence and sloth of Arab culture.
Israel’s crime isn’t striking back at terror, but demonstrating, year after year, that a country in the Middle East can be governed without resort to terror. Israel’s crime hasn’t been denying Arab rights, but insisting on human rights for women and minorities.
Israel’s crime has been making democracy work where tyranny prevailed for 5,000 years. Israel’s crime has been survival against overwhelming odds, while legions of Arab nationalists, Islamist extremists and Western leftists want every Jew dead.
But Israel’s greatest crime was to expose the global cult of victimhood, to prove that hard work, fortitude and courage could overcome even history’s grimmest disaster.
Was it a crime to hand Gaza back to Palestinian authorities, to give peace a chance? Look what Israel received in return for trading land for peace.
Let us never forget the fundamental truth that, while Israel longs to live in peace with its neighbors, those neighbors openly profess the desire to eliminate Israel and exterminate its people.
Indeed, Arab and regional jealousy toward Israel is so all-consuming, so necessary to excuse the Arab art of failure, that even these judicious airstrikes will hardly make a dent in the terrorist threat.
Unless Israel sends in ground forces for the long haul – and thousands of IDF reservists are being mobilized – there will be, at best, a temporary respite from terror attacks. Even a new occupation of Gaza would not fully solve the problem.
A crucial point about interfaith and interethnic conflicts that we sheltered Americans refuse to understand is that, all too often, there’s just no good solution – and not even a bad solution, short of acts of barbarism.
It’s a rare conflict that results in an enduring peace. Unintended consequences abound. At times, you fight just to buy time, to gain breathing space – or merely to frustrate an enemy’s designs for a limited period.
That’s the situation Israel faces: No hope of an ultimate victory, but a constant fight to survive. Enemies who believe their god ordains their actions can’t be placated. For faith-fueled terrorists, such as the core members of Hamas, the struggle with Israel’s a zero-sum game. Compromise is, at most, an expedient tool, never an acceptable end state.
What will we see in the coming days? Much depends on Israel’s resolve. The most probable scenario is that Hamas will continue launching terror rockets for a few weeks to salve its wounded vanity and maintain the image of “resistance,” but will ultimately reduce its attacks against Israel – while it rebuilds its cadres and restocks its arsenal.
Israel will have bought time, not peace.
What might Israel have done better? It’s essential to take out the top terrorist leaders. But Israel’s government remains reluctant to target the cowardly Hamas leaders hiding in Damascus – or even the top terrorists remaining in Gaza.
For terrorist bosses, the rank-and-file are disposable and replaceable. You can’t just kill the gunmen. You have to kill the names.
We may sympathize with the average Palestinian family, exploited by generations of corrupt leaders and now caught in yet another round of violence. But let us never forget that Israel hasn’t fired thousands of blind rockets into Palestinian cities, that Israeli suicide bombers don’t attack Arab restaurants and bus stops, and that Israel seeks to avoid harming civilians – while Hamas seeks to kill as many civilians as possible.
In a world where there are no good answers, Israel just answered as best it could. The world’s response? “How dare Jews defend themselves.”
Humanity doesn’t progress. It just changes clothes.
Risen from the enlisted ranks, Ralph Peters became an intelligence officer and a foreign area specialist for Russia and its borderlands. He has served in infantry units, in the Pentagon, and in the Executive Office of the President. His military career and personal interests have taken him to more than fifty countries. He is the author of Beyond Terror: Strategy in a Changing World and the highly-influential Fighting For The Future: Will America Triumph?
YET MORE MONEY FOR THE PALESTINIANS TO SQUANDER
Tom Gross adds: I regularly receive press releases such as the one below from various governments. Palestinians continue to be the best-funded per capita population in the world. Much of it is squandered to buy arms, or in corruption and waste. It is amazing that the U.S., EU and other donors seem willing to put up with this.
***
The U.S. will contributes another $85 million for humanitarian assistance to Palestinian refugees
Press release, Office of the Spokesman
State Department, Washington, DC
December 30, 2008
The United States announces its plan to contribute $85 million to the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) for its 2009 appeals. Of the $85 million announced today, $25 million will go to UNRWA’s Emergency Appeal for the West Bank and Gaza; $60 million to UNRWA’s General Fund.
Through this contribution to the Emergency Appeal for the West Bank and Gaza, Palestinian refugees, who comprise 70 percent of the population in Gaza and 30 percent in the West Bank, will receive urgently needed food, medicines, and other critical humanitarian assistance. The contribution to UNRWA’s General Fund will support the provision of basic and vocational education, primary health care, and relief and social services to more than 4.6 million registered Palestinian refugees in Gaza, the West Bank, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria.
The United States reiterates its deep concern about the escalating violence in Gaza and commends UNRWA’s important work meeting the emergency needs of civilians in Gaza at this very difficult time. We hold Hamas fully responsible for breaking the ceasefire and for the renewal of violence. We call on all concerned to protect innocent lives and to address the urgent humanitarian needs of the people of Gaza, by facilitating necessary access into Gaza for UNRWA and other humanitarian organizations. We also encourage other states to provide urgently needed funding to UNRWA and other international organizations providing lifesaving care to civilians in Gaza.
The United States is UNRWA’s largest bilateral donor, and contributed $184.68 million to UNRWA towards its 2008 Appeals, including $99.87 million for UNRWA’s General Fund and $84.81 million for its emergency appeals for Lebanon, the West Bank, and Gaza. The United States plans to provide additional funding for UNRWA’s 2009 appeals in the future.
* AP: Hamas rockets make Israel rethink West Bank pullback
* Amos Oz: “Hamas’ calculation is simple, cynical and evil: If innocent Israelis are killed – good. If innocent Palestinians are killed – even better”
* Alan Dershowitz: “The attacks on Israeli citizens have little to do with what Israel does or does not do”
This is one of three further dispatches concerning the ongoing Israel-Hamas confrontation. Two of the dispatches contain articles by others, and the third will have various observations and news items by myself.
CONTENTS
1. Amos Oz: “Hamas’ calculation is simple, cynical and evil”
2. Benny Morris: The threats facing Israel
3. Alan Dershowitz: UN and EU playing with fire by appeasing Hamas
4. “Every concession, every territory we leave is used for attacks against us”
5. “Why Israel feels threatened” (By Benny Morris, New York Times, Dec. 30, 2008)
6. “Israel must defend its citizens” (By Amos Oz, Corriere della Sera / Bild, Dec. 30, 2008)
7. “Israel, Hamas & moral idiocy” (By Alan Dershowitz, Christian Science Monitor, Dec. 31, 2008)
8. “Rockets make Israel rethink West Bank pullback” (The Associated Press, Dec. 31, 2008)
AMOS OZ: “HAMAS’ CALCULATION IS SIMPLE, CYNICAL AND EVIL”
[Note by Tom Gross]
I attach four articles below, with summaries first for those who don’t have time to read them in full.
The first article is by renowned Israeli novelist and left-wing activist Amos Oz, who (like almost all Israelis, left and right) is fully supportive of Israel’s defensive war against Hamas.
Writing for the leading Italian daily Corriere della Sera (in an article also reprinted by other outlets including the German tabloid Bild), Amos Oz says:
“The systematic bombing of the citizens in Israel’s towns and cities is a war crime and a crime against humanity. The State of Israel must defend its citizens. It is obvious to everyone that the Israeli government does not wish to enter Gaza; the government would rather continue the ceasefire that Hamas violated and finally revoked. But the suffering of the citizens surrounding Gaza cannot go on.
“… Massive pressure will be exerted on Israel to restrain itself. No such pressure will be placed on Hamas because there is no one to pressure them, and there is almost nothing left with which to pressure them. Israel is a country; Hamas is a gang.
“… Hamas’ calculation is simple, cynical and evil: If innocent Israelis are killed – good. If innocent Palestinians are killed – even better.”
BENNY MORRIS: THE THREATS FACING ISRAEL
In the second article below, historian Benny Morris (who is a subscriber to this email list) explains in The New York Times why Israelis feel threatened:
“Many Israelis feel that the walls – and history – are closing in on their 60-year-old state, much as they felt in early June 1967, just before Israel launched the Six-Day War and destroyed the Egyptian, Jordanian and Syrian armies in Sinai, the West Bank and the Golan Heights.
“… Israelis, or rather, Israeli Jews, are beginning to feel much the way their parents did in those apocalyptic days. Israel is a much more powerful and prosperous state today. In 1967 there were only some 2 million Jews in the country – today there are about 5.5 million – and the military did not have nuclear weapons. But the bulk of the population looks to the future with deep foreboding.”
“… According to Israeli intelligence estimates, Hizbullah now has an arsenal of 30,000 to 40,000 Russian-made rockets, supplied by Syria and Iran – twice the number it possessed in 2006. Some of the rockets can reach Tel Aviv and Dimona, where Israel’s nuclear production facility is located.
“… To the south, Israel faces the Islamist Hamas movement, which controls the Gaza Strip and whose charter promises to destroy Israel and bring every inch of Palestine under Islamic rule and law. Hamas today has an army of thousands. It also has a large arsenal of rockets with the Egyptians largely turning a blind eye, through tunnels from Sinai.
“… Over the past two decades, Israel’s 1.3 million Arab citizens have been radicalized… The birth rates for Israeli Arabs are among the highest in the world, with 4 or 5 children per family (as opposed to the 2 or 3 children per family among Israeli Jews)...”
[Tom Gross adds: The New York Times has carried plenty of anti-Israel op-eds too.]
UN AND EU PLAYING WITH FIRE BY APPEASING HAMAS
In the third article below, Harvard Prof. Alan Dershowitz (who is a subscriber to this email list) says that “much of the world’s response is a false moral equivalence that simply encourages the terrorists.”
“The most dangerous of the responses,” he writes, “is not the Iranian-Hamas absurdity, which is largely ignored by thinking and moral people, but the United Nations and European Union response, which equates the willful murder of civilians with legitimate self-defense pursuant to Article 51 of the United Nations Charter.
“This false moral equivalence only encourages terrorists to persist in their unlawful actions against civilians. The U.S. has it exactly right by placing the blame on Hamas, while urging Israel to do everything possible to minimize civilian casualties.”
Dershowitz also writes: “The attacks on Israeli citizens have little to do with what Israel does or does not do. They have everything to do with an ideology that despises – and openly seeks to destroy – the Jewish state. Consider that rocket attacks increased substantially after Israel disengaged from Gaza in 2005, and they accelerated further after Hamas seized control last year.”
“EVERY CONCESSION, EVERY TERRITORY WE LEAVE IS USED FOR ATTACKS AGAINST US”
In the fourth article below, titled “Rockets make Israel rethink West Bank pullback,” the Associated Press reports that “Israeli hard-liners have warned for many years that any territory Israel vacates will be used to attack it.
“[But] Even in the midst of the war, many Israelis still argue that a peace deal with the Palestinians, which would require a withdrawal from virtually all the West Bank, is the country’s only real security guarantee.
“Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni, in defending the Gaza offensive in a speech to parliament Monday, said Israel remains committed to the idea of a Palestinian state alongside it.
However “the events of recent days, and especially the international criticism of Israel’s response, are likely to “compound Israelis’ reluctance” to support further withdrawals.
“The historical lesson of Oslo, of Lebanon and of Gaza proves that with every concession, every territory we leave is used for attacks against us,” said General Yaakov Amidror.
At least one-tenth of the country’s 7 million citizens and some of its largest cities are now in range of Gaza missiles, and millions more live within reach of Hizbullah rockets from Lebanon.
[Summaries above by Tom Gross]
FULL ARTICLES
“ISRAELI JEWS, ARE BEGINNING TO FEEL MUCH THE WAY THEIR PARENTS DID IN THOSE APOCALYPTIC DAYS”
Why Israel Feels Threatened
By Benny Morris
The New York Times (Op-Ed page)
December 30, 2008
Li-On, Israel -- MANY Israelis feel that the walls – and history – are closing in on their 60-year-old state, much as they felt in early June 1967, just before Israel launched the Six-Day War and destroyed the Egyptian, Jordanian and Syrian armies in Sinai, the West Bank and the Golan Heights.
More than 40 years ago, the Egyptians had driven a United Nations peacekeeping force from the Sinai-Israel border, had closed the Straits of Tiran to Israeli shipping and air traffic and had deployed the equivalent of seven armored and infantry divisions on Israel’s doorstep. Egypt had signed a series of military pacts with Syria and Jordan and placed troops in the West Bank. Arab radio stations blared messages about the coming destruction of Israel.
Israelis, or rather, Israeli Jews, are beginning to feel much the way their parents did in those apocalyptic days. Israel is a much more powerful and prosperous state today. In 1967 there were only some 2 million Jews in the country – today there are about 5.5 million – and the military did not have nuclear weapons. But the bulk of the population looks to the future with deep foreboding.
The foreboding has two general sources and four specific causes. The general problems are simple. First, the Arab and wider Islamic worlds, despite Israeli hopes since 1948 and notwithstanding the peace treaties signed by Egypt and Jordan in 1979 and 1994, have never truly accepted the legitimacy of Israel’s creation and continue to oppose its existence.
Second, public opinion in the West (and in democracies, governments can’t be far behind) is gradually reducing its support for Israel as the West looks askance at the Jewish state’s treatment of its Palestinian neighbors and wards. The Holocaust is increasingly becoming a faint and ineffectual memory and the Arab states are increasingly powerful and assertive.
More specifically, Israel faces a combination of dire threats. To the east, Iran is frantically advancing its nuclear project, which most Israelis and most of the world’s intelligence agencies believe is designed to produce nuclear weapons. This, coupled with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s public threats to destroy Israel – and his denials of the Holocaust and of any homosexuality in Iran, which underscore his irrationality – has Israel’s political and military leaders on tenterhooks.
To the north, the Lebanese fundamentalist organization Hizbullah, which also vows to destroy Israel and functions as an Iranian proxy, has thoroughly rearmed since its war with Israel in 2006. According to Israeli intelligence estimates, Hizbullah now has an arsenal of 30,000 to 40,000 Russian-made rockets, supplied by Syria and Iran – twice the number it possessed in 2006. Some of the rockets can reach Tel Aviv and Dimona, where Israel’s nuclear production facility is located. If there is war between Israel and Iran, Hizbullah can be expected to join in. (It may well join in the renewed Israeli-Palestinian conflict, too.)
To the south, Israel faces the Islamist Hamas movement, which controls the Gaza Strip and whose charter promises to destroy Israel and bring every inch of Palestine under Islamic rule and law. Hamas today has an army of thousands. It also has a large arsenal of rockets – home-made Qassams and Russian-made, Iranian-financed Katyushas and Grads smuggled, with the Egyptians largely turning a blind eye, through tunnels from Sinai.
Last June, Israel and Hamas agreed to a six-month truce. This unsteady calm was periodically violated by armed factions in Gaza that lobbed rockets into Israel’s border settlements. Israel responded by periodically suspending shipments of supplies into Gaza.
In November and early December, Hamas stepped up the rocket attacks and then, unilaterally, formally announced the end of the truce. The Israeli public and government then gave Defense Minister Ehud Barak a free hand. Israel’s highly efficient air assault on Hamas, which began on Saturday, was his first move. Most of Hamas’s security and governmental compounds were turned into rubble and several hundred Hamas fighters were killed.
But the attack will not solve the basic problem posed by a Gaza Strip populated by 1.5 million impoverished, desperate Palestinians who are ruled by a fanatic regime and are tightly hemmed in by fences and by border crossings controlled by Israel and Egypt.
An enormous Israeli ground operation aimed at conquering the Gaza Strip and destroying Hamas would probably bog down in the alleyways of refugee camps before achieving its goal. (And even if these goals were somehow achieved, renewed and indefinite Israeli rule over Gaza would prove unpalatable to all concerned.)
More likely are small, limited armored incursions, intended to curtail missile launches and kill Hamas fighters. But these are also unlikely to bring the organization to heel — though they may exercise sufficient pressure eventually to achieve, with the mediation of Turkey or Egypt, a renewed temporary truce. That seems to be the most that can be hoped for, though a renewal of rocket attacks on southern Israel, once Hamas recovers, is as certain as day follows night.
The fourth immediate threat to Israel’s existence is internal. It is posed by the country’s Arab minority. Over the past two decades, Israel’s 1.3 million Arab citizens have been radicalized, with many openly avowing a Palestinian identity and embracing Palestinian national aims. Their spokesmen say that their loyalty lies with their people rather than with their state, Israel. Many of the community’s leaders, who benefit from Israeli democracy, more or less publicly supported Hizbullah in 2006 and continue to call for “autonomy” (of one sort or another) and for the dissolution of the Jewish state.
Demography, if not Arab victory in battle, offers the recipe for such a dissolution. The birth rates for Israeli Arabs are among the highest in the world, with 4 or 5 children per family (as opposed to the 2 or 3 children per family among Israeli Jews).
If present trends persist, Arabs could constitute the majority of Israel’s citizens by 2040 or 2050. Already, within five to 10 years, Palestinians (Israeli Arabs coupled with those who live in the West Bank and Gaza Strip) will form the majority population of Palestine (the land lying between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean).
Friction between Israeli Arabs and Jews is already a cogent political factor. In 2000, at the start of the second intifada, thousands of Arab youngsters, in sympathy with their brethren in the territories, rioted along Israel’s major highways and in Israel’s ethnically mixed cities.
The past fortnight has seen a recurrence, albeit on a smaller scale, of such rioting. Down the road, Israel’s Jews fear more violence and terrorism by Israeli Arabs. Most Jews see the Arab minority as a potential fifth column.
What is common to these specific threats is their unconventionality. Between 1948 and 1982 Israel coped relatively well with the threat from conventional Arab armies. Indeed, it repeatedly trounced them. But Iran’s nuclear threat, the rise of organizations like Hamas and Hizbullah that operate from across international borders and from the midst of dense civilian populations, and Israeli Arabs’ growing disaffection with the state and their identification with its enemies, offer a completely different set of challenges. And they are challenges that Israel’s leaders and public, bound by Western democratic and liberal norms of behavior, appear to find particularly difficult to counter.
Israel’s sense of the walls closing in on it has this past week led to one violent reaction. Given the new realities, it would not be surprising if more powerful explosions were to follow.
“A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY”
Israel must defend its citizens
By Amos Oz
Corriere della Sera
December 30, 2008
(Translated from Italian)
The systematic bombing of the citizens in Israel’s towns and cities is a war crime and a crime against humanity. The State of Israel must defend its citizens. It is obvious to everyone that the Israeli government does not wish to enter Gaza; the government would rather continue the ceasefire that Hamas violated and finally revoked. But the suffering of the citizens surrounding Gaza cannot go on.
The reluctance to enter Gaza stems not from indecisiveness but from well knowing that Hamas is actually eager to cause Israel to embark on a military operation: If dozens or even hundreds of Palestinian civilians, women and children are killed in an Israeli action, radicalism would gain strength in Gaza, Abu Mazen’s rule in the West Bank might collapse, and Hamas extremists could replace him.
The Arab world will rally together around the atrocious sights that Al-Jazeera will air from Gaza, and the world court of public opinion will rush to accuse Israel of war crimes. This is the same court of public opinion that remains unmoved by the systematic bombing of population centers in Israel.
Massive pressure will be exerted on Israel to restrain itself. No such pressure will be placed on Hamas because there is no one to pressure them, and there is almost nothing left with which to pressure them. Israel is a country; Hamas is a gang.
What remains for us to do? The best thing for Israel is to achieve a total ceasefire in exchange for alleviating the blockade of Gaza. If Hamas insists on refusing the ceasefire and continues bombing Israeli citizens, we must take care lest the military action play into Hamas’ hands. Hamas’ calculation is simple, cynical and evil: If innocent Israelis are killed – good. If innocent Palestinians are killed – even better. Israel must act wisely against this stance, and not out of the heat of the moment
“THE ATTACKS ON ISRAELI CITIZENS HAVE LITTLE TO DO WITH WHAT ISRAEL DOES OR DOES NOT DO”
Israel, Hamas, and moral idiocy
Much of the world’s response is a false moral equivalence that simply encourages the terrorists.
By Alan M. Dershowitz
Christian Science Monitor
December 31, 2008
Cambridge, Mass. - Israel’s decision to take military action against Hamas rocket attacks targeting its civilian population has been long in coming. I vividly recall a visit my wife and I took to the Israeli city of Sderot on March 20 of this year. Over the past four years, Palestinian terrorists – in particular, Hamas and Islamic Jihad – have fired more than 2,000 rockets at this civilian area, which is home to mostly poor and working-class people.
The rockets are designed exclusively to maximize civilian deaths, and some have barely missed schoolyards, kindergartens, hospitals, and school buses. But others hit their targets, killing more than a dozen civilians since 2001, including in February 2008 a father of four who had been studying at the local university. These anticivilian rockets have also injured and traumatized countless children.
The residents of Sderot were demanding that their nation take action to protect them. But Israel’s postoccupation military options were limited, since Hamas deliberately fires its deadly rockets from densely populated urban areas, and the Israeli army has a strict policy of trying to avoid civilian casualties.
The firing of rockets at civilians from densely populated civilian areas is the newest tactic in the war between terrorists who love death and democracies that love life. The terrorists have learned how to exploit the morality of democracies against those who do not want to kill civilians, even enemy civilians.
The attacks on Israeli citizens have little to do with what Israel does or does not do. They have everything to do with an ideology that despises – and openly seeks to destroy – the Jewish state. Consider that rocket attacks increased substantially after Israel disengaged from Gaza in 2005, and they accelerated further after Hamas seized control last year.
In the past months, a shaky cease-fire, organized by Egypt, was in effect. Hamas agreed to stop the rockets and Israel agreed to stop taking military action against Hamas terrorists in the Gaza Strip. The cease-fire itself was morally dubious and legally asymmetrical.
Israel, in effect, was saying to Hamas: If you stop engaging in the war crime of targeting our innocent civilians, we will stop engaging in the entirely lawful military acts of targeting your terrorists. Under the cease-fire, Israel reserved the right to engage in self-defense actions such as attacking terrorists who were in the course of firing rockets at its civilians.
Just before the hostilities began, Israel reopened a checkpoint to allow humanitarian aid to reenter Gaza. It had closed the point of entry after it had been targeted by Gazan rockets. Israel’s prime minister, Ehud Olmert, also issued a stern, final warning to Hamas that unless it stopped the rockets, there would be a full-scale military response. The Hamas rockets continued and Israel kept its word, implementing a carefully prepared targeted air attack against Hamas targets.
On Sunday, I spoke to the air force general, now retired, who worked on the planning of the attack. He told me of the intelligence and planning that had gone into preparing for the contingency that the military option might become necessary. The Israeli air force had pinpointed with precision the exact locations of Hamas structures in an effort to minimize civilian casualties.
Even Hamas sources have acknowledged that the vast majority of those killed have been Hamas terrorists, though some civilian casualties are inevitable when, as BBC’s Rushdi Abou Alouf – who is certainly not pro-Israel – reported, “The Hamas security compounds are in the middle of the city.” Indeed, his home balcony was just 20 meters away from a compound he saw bombed.
There have been three types of international response to the Israeli military actions against the Hamas rockets. Not surprisingly, Iran, Hamas, and other knee-jerk Israeli-bashers have argued that the Hamas rocket attacks against Israeli civilians are entirely legitimate and that the Israeli counterattacks are war crimes.
Equally unsurprising is the response of the United Nations, the European Union, Russia, and others who, at least when it comes to Israel, see a moral and legal equivalence between terrorists who target civilians and a democracy that responds by targeting the terrorists.
And finally, there is the United States and a few other nations that place the blame squarely on Hamas for its unlawful and immoral policy of using its own civilians as human shields, behind whom they fire rockets at Israeli civilians.
The most dangerous of the three responses is not the Iranian-Hamas absurdity, which is largely ignored by thinking and moral people, but the United Nations and European Union response, which equates the willful murder of civilians with legitimate self-defense pursuant to Article 51 of the United Nations Charter.
This false moral equivalence only encourages terrorists to persist in their unlawful actions against civilians. The US has it exactly right by placing the blame on Hamas, while urging Israel to do everything possible to minimize civilian casualties.
ROCKETS MAKE ISRAEL RETHINK WEST BANK PULLBACK
Rockets make Israel rethink West Bank pullback
By Aron Heller and Matti Friedman
The Associated Press
December 31, 2008
ASHDOD, Israel (AP) – As rockets from Gaza reach deeper into Israel than ever before, they may be weakening what has long been a cornerstone of Middle East peace efforts – the prospect of exchanging land for peace.
Israeli hard-liners have warned for many years that any territory Israel vacates will be used to attack it.
Now they can point to the Hamas missile that slammed into a bus stop in this port city Monday, killing a 39-year-old woman. It was fired from the Gaza Strip, which Israel gave up in 2005 and is now ruled by Hamas militants who reject the existence of the Jewish state.
Even in the midst of the war, many Israelis still argue that a peace deal with the Palestinians, which would require a withdrawal from virtually all the West Bank, is the country’s only real security guarantee.
Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni, in defending the Gaza offensive in a speech to parliament Monday, said Israel remains committed to the idea of a Palestinian state alongside it.
But the missile that hit Ashdod, Israel’s largest southern city with 207,000 residents 23 miles north of Gaza, drove home a grim new reality for 32-year-old Alin Ben-Yosef. She fled to Tel Aviv for the night with her two young daughters after the attack.
“Tel Aviv is the safest place we have,” Ben-Yosef said. “But it is starting to feel as if there are no safe places anymore.”
At least one-tenth of the country’s 7 million citizens and some of its largest cities are now in range of Gaza missiles, and millions more live within reach of Hizbullah rockets from Lebanon.
Israelis who never thought they would be living under rocket fire prepared bomb shelters. Newspapers and TV stations displayed color-coded maps informing Israelis that they had 15, 30 or 45 seconds to reach cover after a warning siren goes off. In Ashdod malls, directions to the nearest shelters were posted.
Four Israelis have died in rocket fire since the strikes began. Gaza officials say 390 people there have been killed in airstrikes including 200 members of Hamas security forces.
Israel is now being hit by more sophisticated weapons that Hamas has smuggled into Gaza through underground tunnels along the border with Egypt.
Militants once relied on crude homemade rockets that could fly just 12 miles to terrorize Israeli communities near the border with Gaza. Now they are firing more accurate weapons manufactured in China and Iran that have dramatically expanded their range, Israeli defense officials say.
More than two dozen rockets and mortar shells had been fired by midday Wednesday, including five that hit in and around the major southern Israeli city of Beersheba, whose 186,000 residents live 22 miles from Gaza. One hit an empty school. Another landed in a small farming community about 20 miles southeast of Tel Aviv, the country’s most populated urban area. No serious casualties were reported.
The expansion of rocket range has implications for the West Bank, where U.S.-led diplomacy long focused on a withdrawal that would make way for a Palestinian state at peace with Israel.
The West Bank is run by a government headed by moderate Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, a Hamas rival who has been conducting peace talks with Israel. Hamas seized control of Gaza by force from Abbas’ Fatah faction forces in 2007.
Israeli opponents of this strategy argue that such a peace would be too fragile to survive, and would bring Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and the nation’s international airport within rocket range.
Meanwhile, Israel is developing an anti-missile system called “Iron Dome,” but completion is years away.
Israeli historian Michael Oren, a Georgetown University professor and fellow at the Shalem Center think tank in Jerusalem, said the events of recent days, and especially the international criticism of Israel’s response, are likely to “compound Israelis’ reluctance” to support further withdrawals.
“This has become a recurring nightmare for Israelis and has made them reluctant to give up strategically vital territory,” Oren said.
But Shaul Arieli, a former military colonel and peace negotiator, said the current violence did not mean an Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank was dead. Israel’s mistake in Gaza was to withdraw unilaterally instead of reaching an agreement with the Palestinians, he said, adding that the missiles from Gaza began long before Israel withdrew.
“Israel has to leave the West Bank in an agreement with someone who recognizes it,” Arieli said.
Israeli hard-liners maintain that every withdrawal brings Israel’s enemies closer: They say the Oslo accords negotiated in the Norwegian capital in the 1990s turned parts of the West Bank into breeding grounds for suicide bombers; the 2000 pullback from south Lebanon brought Hizbullah closer to Israel.
Israeli intelligence believes the Lebanese militia now has rockets that can reach 125 miles, far beyond Tel Aviv – meaning the vast majority of Israelis are in range.
“The historical lesson of Oslo, of Lebanon and of Gaza proves that with every concession, every territory we leave is used for attacks against us,” said Yaakov Amidror, a former general now with the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs.