* An island of Shi’ite Muslim prayer in Israel
* Google founder: Anti-Semitism drove my family out of Russia
* Former Indonesian president: I watched in horror as Iraq lynched its last Jews
* AMIA case prosecutor wants former Argentine president arrested
CONTENTS
1. French state TV network loses al-Dura libel case
2. The world media is mute
3. U.S. store Urban Outfitters pulls “pro-terrorism” Palestinian T-shirt
4. An island of Shi’ite Muslim prayer in Israel
5. Singer Amy Winehouse to undergo drug rehab in Ashkelon
6. Martin Bright: Why do liberals hate Israel so much?
7. Gaza schoolyard missile launchers discovered
8. AMIA case prosecutor wants former Argentine president arrested
9. Former Indonesian president describes lynching of Jews in Iraq
10. Top Israeli-born elephant expert dies in Ethiopian bomb attack
11. Google founder: “My family left Russia because of anti-Semitism”
12. Microsoft CEO: “Microsoft is an Israeli company almost as much as it is American”
13. Can you imagine this happening in an Arab country?
14. The risks of giving up the Golan
[All notes below by Tom Gross]
This first item, written by myself, was originally published on Wednesday, May 21, 2008 on National Review Online.
FRENCH STATE TV NETWORK LOSES AL-DURA LIBEL CASE
In a potentially ground-breaking decision for the way the modern television news media operates, a French court today ruled against the state-owned “France 2” TV network in the long-running libel case surrounding the alleged shooting death of a Palestinian child, Mohammed al-Dura, in the Gaza Strip in 2000.
The death-footage of al-Dura – the veracity of which has been repeatedly questioned by media watchdogs, one of whom defeated France 2 in court today – became a cause célèbre in the Muslim world. Osama bin Laden referred to al-Dura in a post-9/11 video; the killers of the Wall St. Journal reporter Daniel Pearl placed a picture of him in their beheading video; streets, squares and academies have been named after al-Dura.
Today’s ruling shows there are serious doubts about France 2’s version of events, and that the entire world press – including the American TV networks – were irresponsible in being so quick to take at face value the claims of a local Palestinian cameraman working for France 2, a cameraman who has admitted his partisanship.
If it hadn’t been for the way the al-Dura video was then repeatedly played on Arab and international networks, the second Palestinian intifada may never have developed the way it did, thousands of lives might have been saved and there might even possibly have been a Palestinian state living in peace with Israel by now.
THE WORLD MEDIA IS MUTE
The mainstream press have so far refused to cover this decision even though it is potentially crucial for the way the newsgathering process works. This is so even though both Reuters and AP, the world’s two biggest news agencies, ran stories on Wednesday on the al-Dura court decision, and almost every major print and broadcast media in the world subscribe to one or both of Reuters and AP. (The exceptions were the media in France and Israel, where the court decision was widely reported.)
Virtually every major newspaper and TV station in the world made the mistake of attributing the death of al-Dura to Israel, yet now they are refusing to report that they were likely wrong. Many media lionized al-Dura. For example, Time Magazine Europe named Mohammed al-Dura a “newsmaker for 2000”.
It seems that, as was the case with Hizbullah’s staged photos in 2006, and Saeb Erekat’s lies about a large massacre in Jenin in 2002, the media simply refuse to later tell their audience that the stories they had run were the result of manipulations by professional Palestinian fixers.
Where is the commitment to justice? And to truth? And to bringing readers “all the news that’s fit to print”? Or for state-financed media like the BBC to show impartiality? Or are they just too embarrassed to admit they were duped? Or don’t they care, it’s a case of blame the Israelis, who cares if it’s true?
* Here is a timeline of the al-Dura case, noting among other things, that The London Review of Books published a “Requiem for Mohammad al-Dura.”
* For those interested, here is an interview with me from February 2008 explaining the background to the al-Dura affair.
* And for those of you who still haven’t watched the “Pallywood” documentary, including film from the day al-Dura was supposedly shot, it is well worth doing in full. Some of the most important footage is several minutes into the film.
U.S. STORE PULLS “PRO-TERRORISM” PALESTINIAN T-SHIRT
The popular U.S. clothing store Urban Outfitters has stopped sales of a T-shirt which sparked outrage among American Jews and others.
The T-shirt depicts a young Palestinian boy carrying an M-16 rifle, with the PLO flag, and a map of the West Bank and Gaza. The item sold online for $25.
“If Urban Outfitters is good at something, it is getting publicity,” says Ami Cohen, who works for American Apparel in Tel Aviv. “This company has a history of coming into conflict with Jews.”
Several years ago, the company played on the “Jewish American Princess” stereotype by selling T-shirts with the slogan “Everybody Loves a Jewish Girl,” surrounded by dollar signs and shopping bags.
In 2007, it again came into conflict with Jewish and pro-Israel consumers for selling versions of a traditional PLO headdress, the kaffiyeh, as an “anti-war scarf.”
“Of course this T-shirt is supporting terrorism,” said Leah Weiss, an American-Jewish fashion designer. “I’ve joined a Facebook group to boycott Urban Outfitters and get rid of their clothes. I will never shop there again.”
I am told that Urban Outfitters are also selling a book on “The Wall.”
AN ISLAND OF SHI’ITE MUSLIM PRAYER IN ISRAEL
While Palestinian terrorists continue to shoot missiles at the southern Israeli city of Ashkelon (last week one hit a shopping center, badly injuring women and children), The Los Angeles Times has an amazing story about the hospitality of the town’s one and only medical center towards foreign Muslims. (There are no Palestinian Shia Muslims; all are Sunni.)
The Los Angeles Times reports, in summary:
The city of Ashkelon has been in the headlines lately, and not for its pretty beaches. The city of 120,000 has sadly joined Israel’s southern front line as rockets fired from the Gaza Strip improve in range and technology. Last week, a rocket hit a shopping mall in town; the dozens of injured were treated at the city’s Barzilai Medical Center.
Ashkelon has 5,000 years of recorded history, but when the first medical center (Barzilai) was built in 1961, nothing indicated that the hill out back was anything special. It turns out that it is a site holy to certain Shi’ite Muslims, mostly from India and Pakistan, thousands of whom have come to pray there over the years. A prayer area for pilgrims built of marble from India was opened seven or eight years ago.
“They are quiet, peaceful people. They come in silence,” said Dr. Ron Lobel, deputy director of the medical center. “An island of Shi’ite Muslim prayer in an Israeli hospital in a Jewish state. It really is unique.”
(Please click here to see some photos associated with this story.)
SINGER AMY WINEHOUSE TO UNDERGO DRUG REHAB IN ASHKELON
The (London) Jewish Chronicle reports that Grammy Award winning recording artist Amy Winehouse, currently one of the world’s best known pop stars, is due in Israel “within weeks” to undergo a drug rehabilitation program, at a renowned anti-drug institution at the above-mentioned Barzilai Medical Center in Ashkelon.
MARTIN BRIGHT: WHY DO LIBERALS HATE ISRAEL SO MUCH?
In the blog of Britain’s leading left-liberal intellectual weekly magazine, The New Statesman, Martin Bright (a rare voice standing up for human rights of Israelis on the European left) asks one of the key questions of our times: “why do European liberals hate Israel so much?”
“The Israel issue has become a terrible fault line on the British left…The internet has flushed out a whole subculture of left-wing hostility to Israel that should make even [an anti-Zionist Jew like Mike] Marqusee uncomfortable. This has a regular and willing outlet on the Guardian’s Comment is Free website and the New Statesman also suffers from it whenever we publish articles on Israel. Postings on our blog casually link Zionism to fascism or South African apartheid. The language is so unpleasant that it is difficult not to draw the conclusion that many of the comments are driven by anti-Semitism.
“…For a long time Israel has been accused of crying wolf over surrounding countries that want to ‘drive it into the sea’. Now it has a neighbour whose president has not only made that threat explicit, but who intends to develop the capacity to do it. In such a conflict, which has already begun for the people of southern Israel, on whose side will British left-liberal opinion be?
Tom Gross adds: predictably Bright’s post produced a deluge of anti-Semitic comments on The New Statesman website.
GAZA SCHOOLYARD MISSILE LAUNCHERS DISCOVERED
* On Thursday (May 22) soldiers from Israel’s elite Givati Brigade found missile launchers and other weaponry behind a Gaza school. One soldier was shot and injured by Palestinian snipers in the school. The soldiers were carrying out counterterrorism operations in Gaza following an Islamic Jihad suicide bomb attack earlier that day on Israeli trucks attempting to transport humanitarian supplies, including food and medicines, into Gaza.
Only the suicide bomber was killed in the suicide attack, but a number of homes in the Israeli community of Netiv Ha’asara were damaged as a result of the explosion.
* In another attack on Thursday, terrorists fired mortar shells at the Nahal Oz fuel depot, the terminal through which cooking gas and other fuel supplies are pumped into Gaza. The Nahal Oz fuel depot has been attacked by terrorists numerous times this year. In one instance, Hamas terrorists (whom Jimmy Carter believes should be treated with respect) stole 60,000 liters of gasoline from their own Palestinian Authority Gaza Power Authority, earmarked for use by ordinary Palestinians.
* The 16-year-old Palestinian would-be suicide bomber shot dead at the Huwwara checkpoint on Monday “was carrying our explosives,” Fatah’s al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades proudly claimed on their website. An alert Israeli soldier had spotted the explosive belt and opened fire after the teen refused to raise his arms away from the belt.
Fatah have wrongly been described by newspapers like The New York Times as “moderates” and by President Bush as “friends of peace.” The dead teenager was in possession of three explosive devices, reports the Palestinian Maan news agency.
AMIA CASE PROSECUTOR WANTS FORMER ARGENTINE PRESIDENT ARRESTED
Alberto Nisman, the prosecutor investigating the 1994 bombing of the AMIA Jewish center in Buenos Aires, is seeking the arrest of former Argentinean president Carlos Menem, accusing him of covering up the involvement of a Syrian-Argentinean businessman in the terrorist attack. Nisman also requested the arrests of the former president’s brother, Munir Menem, and four other men. As Menem is now a senator and thus immune from prosecution, Nisman has also asked the Senate to withdraw his immunity.
Eighty-nine people, mainly Jews, were killed and more than 200 injured when a bomb exploded in a van outside the main building of the Buenos Aires Jewish community in July 1994. While victims’ families say they have suspected Menem’s involvement for years, the arrest request is the first time that the former president – who denies the allegations – has been formally linked to an alleged cover-up of the attack. The Lebanese group Hizbullah, supported by Syria and Iran, is believed to have carried out the attack, as well as another attack on the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires that killed 29 people.
Argentina is now looking for five Iranian nationals suspected of helping Hizbullah with the AMIA bombing.
FORMER INDONESIAN PRESIDENT DESCRIBES LYNCHING OF JEWS IN IRAQ
The San Francisco Sentinel reported this week:
“Abdurrahman Wahid, 67, the former Indonesian president and a leading Muslim scholar, revealed the root of his understanding of the risks and perils of Jewish existence. Wahid was a student at Baghdad University in 1966, earning his keep as a secretary at a textile importer, when he befriended the firm’s elderly accountant, an Iraqi Jew he remembers only by his family name, Ramin.
“In 1968, the Iraqi government effectively had come under the control of Saddam Hussein, who at that time was deputy to the president, Ahmad Hassan al-Bakr. At Saddam’s behest, Iraqi courts had convicted 14 Iraqis – nine of them Jews – on trumped-up charges of spying for Israel, and they were hanged in Baghdad’s Tahrir Square, just steps away from where the textile firm had offices.
“... Wahid has gained prominence for his insistence on introducing Muslim nations to certain truths about the Jews. He has called Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad a ‘liar’ for denying the Holocaust. Wahid says moderate Islam stands a greater chance of triumphing over Islamic radicalism once Western leaders stop trying to accommodate Islamic extremists. Saudi Arabia, in particular, remains the primary funding source for the global spread of fundamentalist Islam.”
TOP ISRAELI-BORN ELEPHANT EXPERT DIES IN ETHIOPIAN BOMB ATTACK
Prof. Yehezkel Shoshani, regarded as the world’s leading expert on elephants, died at the age of 65 on Thursday when a minibus he was traveling in exploded in a bomb attack in the center of Ethiopia’s capital, Addis Ababa.
Shoshani, from Tel Aviv, was teaching at a university in Ethiopia. He had spent much of the previous decade studying elephant communities in Eritrea and worked to reverse their decreasing population.
GOOGLE FOUNDER: “MY FAMILY LEFT RUSSIA BECAUSE OF ANTI-SEMITISM”
Google founder Sergey Brin, who stayed on in Israel for a few days after the conclusion of last week’s 60th anniversary celebrations, has told the Israeli daily Ha’aretz that “anti-Semitism was the main reason his family left Russia.”
As I mentioned in a previous dispatch, Brin, 34, was in Israel for President Shimon Peres’ presidential conference “Facing Tomorrow,” and took the opportunity to visit Google’s growing Israeli offices. He said Google is also considering buying some Israeli hi-tech start-up companies.
Brin was born in Moscow in 1973 to Jewish parents. His father, a would-be physicist, was banned from Moscow University under a Communist Party decree banning Jews from physics departments.
Ha’aretz writes: “Mikhail Brin decided to study mathematics instead, and was offered a place although the entry exams for Jews were sat separately, in rooms that were notoriously known as ‘the gas chambers.’ In 1970, he graduated with distinction. Later, he gained his PhD from the University of Krakow, and worked for the Russian economic policy-planning agency.
“Sergey’s mother, Evgenya, worked in the research lab of the Soviet gas and oil institute. Like her husband, she had struggled against the anti-Semitic discrimination which prevailed in the Soviet academia, and defied it.
“... The Brins decided to leave Russia in 1977. Despite the fear of being declared “refuseniks,” Evgenya was adamant to leave.
“In 1978 they applied for emigration permit, and as a result Mikhail was fired and Evgenya had to resign. The family barely got by for several months until their application was approved in 1979. Shortly afterwards, the gates of the Soviet bloc were hermetically closed for emigration.”
MICROSOFT CEO: “MICROSOFT IS AN ISRAELI COMPANY ALMOST AS MUCH AS IT IS AMERICAN”
Microsoft opened a new strategic research and development center in Herzliya, Israel, on Wednesday, in addition to its R&D facility in Haifa, which has been running since 1991. Together, the facilities currently employ 600 technology specialists and Microsoft has announced the hiring of a further 150 next year.
Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, who was visiting Israel on Wednesday, said, “I predict that Israel’s importance to Microsoft as a key center of innovation will grow significantly in the coming years... Microsoft is now an Israeli company almost as much as it is American.”
CAN YOU IMAGINE THIS HAPPENING IN AN ARAB COUNTRY?
The Jerusalem Post reports on a new memorial to commemorate the 6,000 homosexuals murdered by the Nazis, one of the first of its kind in the world:
“When Tel Aviv city councilman Itai Pinkas was in Amsterdam last year, he stared for a long time at the monument honoring homosexuals killed in the Holocaust, sensing its impact was going to stay with him for a long time.
“When he got back to Tel Aviv, he took that powerful feeling and raced straight to Mayor Ron Huldai’s office to talk. Now, Pinkas and Huldai have revealed the outcome of the meeting: Tel Aviv is going to be home to the country’s first memorial to gay victims of Nazi persecution. The public sculpture is slated to go up in the centrally located Gan Meir by midwinter.
“‘Now these innocent victims will be remembered forever,’ said Pinkas. ‘There will be a reminder to all of us of what happened in the past, and unfortunately of the persecution that still continues in the present.’
“Homosexuality was outlawed in Germany in 1871, when the penal code was ratified under chancellor Otto von Bismarck. The Nazis later expanded the code to ban loosely defined ‘lewd acts.’ According to Yad Vashem historian Prof. David Bankier, there were an estimated 1.5 million homosexuals in Germany when the Nazis came to power. ‘Approximately 100,000 were arrested,’ he said. ‘And 10,000 to 15,000 were sent to concentration camps, where as many as 60 percent died.’”
THE RISKS OF GIVING UP THE GOLAN
Below, I attach a pessimistic article about what “peace” with Syria might entail for Israel:
“Phase 3: Assad’s minority Alawite regime will be toppled, as a peace deal will in fact serve to precipitate his downfall... His regime has no legitimacy in Syria as it is, particularly when it comes to the Muslim Brothers, whose power keeps growing. Al-Qaeda already issued a death sentence on Bashar over his apparent ties with Israel and cruelty to Islamic radicals.
“Once Assad’s regime is toppled, the Golan Heights will turn into the radical spearhead against Israel, and not only from Syria: People will be coming from Iran, Afghanistan and elsewhere. Terrorism will be two-pronged – both from the Golan and from Lebanon. Life in the north will turn into an unbearable nightmare, yet the situation will be irreversible.”
-- Tom Gross
FULL ARTICLE
THE DAY AFTER ISRAEL LEAVES THE GOLAN
The day after a deal: Terror
By Guy Bechor
Yediot Ahronot (Tel Aviv)
May 22, 2008
Let’s assume, just for the sake of making a point, that Syria will get the Golan Heights, which is sovereign Israeli territory in every way (Israeli law applies there just as much as it does in Herzliya; it is impossible to evacuate residents from there the way they were removed from Gaza, because property rights in the Golan are identical to the ones in Tel Aviv.) What will Bashar Assad do in such case?
Phase 1: About a million Syrian residents will be settled in the Golan immediately. The Syrians are already arguing that about 100,000 Syrians fled the Golan in 1967. If we count them and their descendents, we’re already at 500,000. You want proof? Even though the Golan Heights are not in Syrian hands, a presidential decree has already been issued announcing that any Syrian resident who moves to the Golan will receive a government allowance.
This is what the Syrians did in Lebanon in order to take it over. While the Syrian army was forced to withdraw from Lebanon, the Syrians left 800,000 laborers behind who work in Lebanon and transfer their salaries back to Syria. And so, the Syrian chokehold on Lebanon has remained intact, despite the apparent withdrawal. Elsewhere in the world, the Syrians would be referred to as “settlers.” Israel is not allowed to do the same. But when Syria does this, it’s apparently ok.
Phase 2: This will enable Bashar Assad to realize his dream with no interruptions – establishing a “resistance” against Israel in the Golan Heights. Officially, he will argue that he has no connection to the terror attacks that would be directed at the Galilee region and northern Israel from the Golan, heaven forbid, yet in practice Syrian intelligence officers will do as they please vis-à-vis northern Israel. In fact, they already did it in northern Lebanon.
Lebanon’s pro-government leader Saad al-Hariri openly accused Syria and its intelligence agencies not only of being behind the acts of two odd underground groups, but of “inventing”“ them in order to sabotage Lebanon. Why won’t the Syrians do the same in the Golan? Would a peace deal with Israel stop them? With Lebanon they have not only peace, but even an official relationship of fraternity and friendship.
Phase 3: Assad’s minority Alawite regime will be toppled, as a peace deal will in fact serve to precipitate his downfall (and for that reason, Bashar won’t be pursuing real peace with Israel.) His regime has no legitimacy in Syria as it is, particularly when it comes to the Muslim Brothers, whose power keeps growing. Al-Qaeda already issued a death sentence on Bashar over his apparent ties with Israel and cruelty to Islamic radicals.
Once Assad’s regime is toppled, the Golan Heights will turn into the radical spearhead against Israel, and not only from Syria: People will be coming from Iran, Afghanistan and elsewhere. Terrorism will be two-pronged – both from the Golan and from Lebanon. Life in the north will turn into an unbearable nightmare, yet the situation will be irreversible. The Golan will shift from being an empty region to being a home to one million zealous Syrians.
The Sinai Peninsula is so large that the situation there is always reversible. On the Jordanian front we didn’t renounce anything, and on the Palestinian front we can always reoccupy any territory. Yet with Syria the situation will be different: From an empty buffer zone, the Golan Heights will turn into a crowded anti-Israel region for generations to come. From a strategic asset to Israel, the Golan would turn into a burden on top of the other regional efforts to eliminate Israel. Our future generations won’t forgive anyone who would do that.
* A masters degree in Israeli studies is proving popular at a Palestinian university
* German opinion of Israel now so low that even citizens of the United Arab Emirates think more highly of the Jewish state
* “The Israeli enemy never dared to do to Beirut what Hizbullah has done,” lamented Fouad Siniora, Lebanon’s embattled PM
CONTENTS
1. Hizbullah’s Western apologists
2. Capture of mountain village by Hizbullah seen as a threat to Israel
3. Fatah al-Islam says it will fight “humiliation” by Iran in Lebanon
4. “Applying electrical shocks to his genitals”
5. Iranian Revolutionary Guards caught fighting in Lebanon
6. Official Iranian press yesterday again denies gas chambers at Auschwitz
7. German support for Israel slipping away fast
8. Palestinians learning about their Israeli enemy
9. The Guardian’s obsessive verbal pogrom
10. An unpublished letter to The Guardian
11. “Why Hizbullah should be condemned” (By Dean Godson, Times, May 14, 2008)
12. “A special relationship” (By Daniel Schwammenthal, WSJ Europe, May 13, 2008)
13. “The Birth of a Nation, 1948” (By Ruth Gruber, New York Times, May 18, 2008)
14. “Learn about your enemy” (By Nathan Jeffay, Education Guardian, May 6, 2008)
HIZBULLAH’S WESTERN APOLOGISTS
[Note by Tom Gross]
I attach four articles of interest from recent days (the first two written by subscribers to this email list) and various other related notes.
In the first, Dean Godson (writing in The Times of London) asks why, when Israel defended itself against attack by Hizbullah in 2006, the world was outraged, but now that Hizbullah are deliberately slaughtering Lebanese civilians (include a massacre of Lebanese Druze last week), in what is the worst sectarian strife since the 1975-90 civil war, the world is strangely silent.
“Even the Israeli enemy never dared to do to Beirut what Hizbullah has done,” lamented Fouad Siniora, Lebanon’s embattled Prime Minister, last weekend.
Yet there has been not a peep from the concerned humanitarians of the Stop the War Coalition, which boasted of putting 100,000 people on to the streets to protest against Israeli assaults.
If Hizbullah is, as their Western apologists claim, an entirely indigenous “resistance” movement, why have pictures gone up in Beirut of the Iranian leader, Ali Khamenei, and the Syrian President, Bashar Assad, for the first time since the Cedar Revolution of 2005?
(For a photo montage about Hizbullah and Iran, please click here. )
HIZBULLAH CAPTURE OF MOUNTAIN VILLAGE SEEN AS A THREAT TO ISRAEL
Tom Gross adds: It was reported that as part of their attacks last week, Hizbullah seized control of the strategic mountain-top village of Niha in Druze heartlands 25 miles south-east of the Lebanese capital Beirut, thereby consolidating strategic gains that could be used in confrontations with Israel.
If the reports are accurate, the village could now provide the Iranian-backed terror group with a crucial link between its stronghold in the eastern Bekaa Valley and the coastal highway that leads to Hizbullah’s bases in Beirut’s southern suburbs.
It was also reported that Hizbullah gunmen took over key positions in Aley, a Druze town north of the Chouf mountains, which abuts the main Beirut-Damascus highway, giving them control of another key artery.
(Other reports suggest the Druze gave Hizbullah a thrashing in the Chouf mountains, and Druze websites claim they killed at least 32 Hizbullah fighters there.)
FATAH AL-ISLAM SAYS IT WILL FIGHT “HUMILIATION” BY IRAN IN LEBANON
The fundamentalist Sunni group Fatah al-Islam, defined by Lebanese government as a terrorist organization, has vowed to confront those “bowing the heads of the Sunnis in Beirut” with “bloodshed,” the pan-Arab Al-Hayat daily reported on Thursday.
In an indirect reference to the Shia Hizbullah group, Fatah al-Islam said in a statement that what happened in Beirut, “the killing, burning and humiliation to the Sunni people, is not justified or accepted.”
“Anyone who wants to bow the heads of our people in Beirut” will be confronted even if the price is “bloodshed,” the statement said.
Fatah al-Islam fought deadly battles with the Lebanese army last spring in the Palestinian camp of Nahr el-Bared in northern Lebanon. The Lebanese army crushed most of the fighters but some remain at large.
(For background on Fatah al-Islam, see the notes on these three dispatches.)
“APPLYING ELECTRICAL SHOCKS TO HIS GENITALS”
Amazingly, this morning’s International Herald Tribune finally carries a front page story revealing some of what went on in Lebanon in the last two weeks. The first two paragraphs of the report read as follows:
“For two and a half days, Hussein al-Haj Obaid lay on the floor of a darkened warehouse in west Beirut, blindfolded and terrified. Militiamen loyal to Hizbullah had kidnapped him at a checkpoint after killing his nephew in front of him.
“Throughout those awful days, as his kidnappers kicked and punched him, applied electrical shocks to his genitals and insulted him with sectarian taunts, he could hear the chatter of gunfire and the crash of rocket-propelled grenades outside, as Hizbullah and its allies took control of the capital.”
***
IHT: OBSESSED WITH ISRAEL
But lest anyone imagine that the International Herald Tribune has suddenly decided to criticize Hizbullah rather than Israel, both comment pages of today’s Herald Tribune are dominated by articles critical of Israel; the entire letters column is devoted to letters critical of Israel (save for a two paragraph letter on Burma); the paper’s editorial is harshly critical of President Bush’s speech last week in the Knesset (a speech I praised in my previous dispatch); one comment piece sneers at American Jews for supporting Israel; another praises the duplicitous anti-Zionist pseudo-historian Ilan Pappe, and says that Israel has never accepted that the Palestinians should have their own state (this is a complete lie: Israel has on many occasions agreed to plans that would have created a Palestinian Arab state); a third comment piece says Israel is “building settlements all over the West Bank.” (In fact settlement building has ground to an almost complete halt.)
IRANIAN REVOLUTIONARY GUARDS CAUGHT FIGHTING IN LEBANON
Lebanese Intelligence sources revealed that a number of Hizbullah fighters who were captured during last week’s clashes cannot speak Arabic, but only Farsi, Ya Lebanon, a Lebanese website reported.
The sources said that those detained either have identified themselves or been identified by third parties as members of the Iranian regime’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard.
Last week, Lebanese Druze leader Walid Jumblatt called for an end to flights from Iran to Lebanon. He said that these flights were being used to transport Iranian fighters and their weapons into Lebanon.
***
IRANIAN-TRAINED TERRORIST ARRESTED IN GAZA
This morning the IDF made public that Alaa Jihad Ouad Abu Madif, a resident of Karara located near Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip, was arrested on April 15 in a joint IDF-ISA operation. Abu Madif participated in a month-long military training course in Iran in May 2007, after being recruited to the Abu Rish faction a short time previously.
His training in Iran included the use of heavy weapons, hand grenades, and target practice.
The Abu Rish faction which splintered from the PLO in the 1990s, was involved in rocket attacks against and suicide attacks Israel.
OFFICIAL IRANIAN PRESS YESTERDAY AGAIN DENIES GAS CHAMBERS AT AUSCHWITZ
More Holocaust denial yesterday here for an English-speaking international audience on the official Iranian government-run Press TV.
GERMAN SUPPORT FOR ISRAEL SLIPPING AWAY FAST
In the second article below, Daniel Schwammenthal, writing in the European edition of The Wall Street Journal, examines attitudes to Israel in Europe’s largest country, Germany.
Contrary to popular opinion, Germans dislike Israel as much as other west Europeans. In a BBC survey last month even the respondents in the United Arab Emirates had a more positive perception of the Jewish state than Germans did.
Schwammenthal, who is German-born, notes: “Guilt is an unhealthy basis for a relationship; it easily turns into resentment. This may help explain why so many Germans – 30% according to last year’s survey by Bertelsmann Foundation – are so eager to compare Israel to fascist Germany. If it were true that Israelis are modern-day Nazis, there would be less reason to feel guilty about the real Nazis.
“... Churchill debunked the idea that Israel could be justified only as reparation for past atrocities long before the Holocaust: ‘The Jews are in Palestine by right and not by sufferance,’ he said in 1922.
“... Unlike Americans, German officials almost never argue that Israel deserves solidarity as a Western ally... Given the similar threats Europe and Israel face from Islamic terror and a nuclear Iran, an alliance between them would seem natural. But as long as Europe’s public considers Israel more as part of the problem than as part of the solution, any such alliance will suffer. It’s time for German and European officials to make the real case for Israel – that of solidarity with an embattled ally.”
REPORTING HISTORY
In the third piece below, veteran journalist Ruth Gruber recounts how she covered the independence of Israel on May 14, 1948, for the New York Herald Tribune, having previously gone to Germany and Austria to interview Holocaust survivors.
This is an emotionally powerful piece worth reading in full for those who have time.
PALESTINIANS LEARNING ABOUT THEIR ISRAELI ENEMY
In the fourth and final article below, Nathan Jeffay, writing in the weekly education supplement of The Guardian reports that “a masters degree in Israeli studies is proving popular among students at a Palestinian university.”
“... What is surprising, though, is that Noful is a Palestinian whose husband is a prisoner in Israel, and she wants an end to the country’s existence. So why is she praising Israel’s achievements?
“The answer is that she one of a growing number of Palestinians who want to study Israel. Noful is a student on the fast-growing Israel studies course at the Palestinian Al-Quds University. Between the university’s West Bank and Gaza campuses, the two-year masters degree has more than 100 students – reflecting a year-on-year growth of about 10% since 2005.”
THE GUARDIAN’S OBSESSIVE VERBAL POGROM
It should be noted that an article of this kind is extremely rare in The Guardian, a newspaper which is almost daily filled with libels against Israel. Jeffay’s article appears in the education supplement. Meanwhile last week’s series of articles maligning virtually every aspect of Israel in the main section of The Guardian led commentator Melanie Philips to note that “The Guardian’s hatred of Israel and the Jews truly is a fathomless – and unfathomable – well. The last few days around Israel’s 60th anniversary have seen a further escalation of its obsessive verbal pogrom.”
With the hate generated against Israel in large parts of the British media, it is perhaps not surprising that anti-Semitic attacks are continuing to rise. Last week four synagogues in London were daubed from head to foot in anti-Jewish graffiti and death threats, reports the Evening Standard newspaper.
***
AN UNPUBLISHED LETTER TO THE GUARDIAN
Here’s a copy of a letter sent to The Guardian last week by Dr. Denis MacEoin of Newcastle upon Tyne, one of a rare band of non-Jewish defenders of Israel in the UK. Since The Guardian declined to publish it, I do so here:
May 14, 2008
Dear Sir,
Israel (whose 60th birthday you celebrate so harshly) is not without its faults, but it is equally not without its achievements. As many of us, Jews and non-Jews alike, celebrate the great things Israel has done and continues to do, you choose to focus on one thing, Gaza. Israel no longer occupies Gaza, yet you present no other images to mark the post-Holocaust recovery but images of Gaza, no other articles than articles stressing the miseries of Palestinian life. Where are your photographs of Israeli hospitals where Jews and Palestinians are treated on the same wards? Where are your images of Israel’s cutting edge medical and technological research? Her scientific and artistic achievements? Her preservation of a genuine democracy in the face of repeated attack and splenetic hatred? Her aid work round the world (and today, before almost anyone else, in Burma)?
The words that spring to mind for this week’s coverage are ‘churlish’, ‘bitter’, ‘unfair’ and ‘one-sided’. Your motives are harder to place. Love for Palestinians is commendable, though love for Hamas is harder to understand. And do you feel love and fellowship for their ingrained racism, their religious fundamentalism, their praise of suicide bombers, their celebrations of death, their regular use of misguidance through the media? By all means be politically correct, but BE correct. Palestinian values are not liberal values, yet your animus towards Israel and your embrace of movements like Hamas give credence and respectability to them.
Is it beyond your ability to show photos of Jews and Arabs working together, of Israeli doctors saving Palestinian lives, of prosperous Arab communities in Israel, of women enjoying full equality with men, of gay pride parades in Tel Aviv, of minority religions like the Baha’is living without harassment, given freedoms no other Middle Eastern country will give them? There are poor Israelis, there are Israeli victims of terror, there are Israelis living under daily barrages of rockets, there are Israelis who build schools and invent new technologies, who run orphanages and sing songs and write poetry and dance. What makes Palestinian suffering, much of it self-inflicted, so all-encompassing that it drives all positive images from the other side from your pages? We deserve better. You deserve to be better.
Yours sincerely,
Dr. Denis MacEoin
FULL ARTICLES
WHY HIZBULLAH SHOULD BE CONDEMNED
Why Hizbullah should be condemned: When Israel attacked Lebanon in 2006 the world was outraged. What about Hizbullah now?
By Dean Godson
The Times (of London)
May 14, 2008
“Even the Israeli enemy never dared to do to Beirut what Hizbullah has done,” lamented Fouad Siniora, Lebanon’s embattled Prime Minister, over the weekend. Yet British bien-pensant opinion – so vocal in its opposition to Israeli actions in Lebanon in 2006 – is strangely silent about the recent outrages.
Why? After all, Hizbullah is one of the world’s most ruthless clerical fascist organisations – complete with ersatz Nazi salutes and Iranian-style Holocaust denial. When the legitimate, democratic Government of Lebanon dared to challenge it, Hizbullah went on a sectarian rampage, murdering scores of opponents and destroying much of the country’s free media.
Yet there has been not a peep from the concerned humanitarians of the Stop the War Coalition, which boasted of putting 100,000 people on to the streets to protest against Israeli assaults. Nor has much been heard from two of Hizbullah’s most high-profile and indulgent British interlocutors – the ex-MI6 officer Alastair Crooke and Michael Ancram, the former Conservative minister.
Mr Ancram urges that we “dance with wolves” such as Hizbullah to obtain peace. “It is suddenly possible to explore Hizbullah claims to be an essentially Lebanese resistance movement with no current aggressive cross-border intentions towards Israel,” he opines. Indeed so: right now its aggressive intentions are inwardly directed, towards its fellow countrymen.
Hizbullah and its allies – which command only 30 per cent of the Lebanese vote – seeks to make good its democratic deficit at the polls through the use of force. The group boasts a vast arsenal. But Messrs Ancram and Crooke don’t want Hizbullah to be pressured to abandon this swiftly, as required by UN Security Council Resolution 1559.
The other great myth about Hizbullah – peddled by too many of its Western apologists – is that it is an entirely indigenous “resistance” movement: if so, why have pictures gone up of the Iranian leader, Ali Khamenei, and the Syrian President, Bashar Assad, for the first time in Beirut since the Cedar Revolution of 2005? And, given the violent oppression of Sunnis by Hizbullah, why has so little been heard from the Muslim Council of Britain and the British Muslim Initiative, two predominantly Sunni organisations? Don’t Lebanese Sunnis deserve a little solidarity from their brethren?
So why does Hizbullah’s putsch of 2008 not excite stern criticism – as did Israel’s invasion of 2006? It’s simple: many “progressives” hate Israeli and Western policy far more than they love Lebanon.
GUILT IS AN UNHEALTHY BASIS FOR A RELATIONSHIP
A ‘Special’ Relationship
By Daniel Schwammenthal
The Wall Street Journal Europe
May 13, 2008
As Israel celebrates its 60th anniversary, there is no denying that the Jewish state has an image problem in Europe. While opinion polls in the U.S. consistently show a majority of Americans sympathetic to Israel, the situation is the reverse on the other side of the Atlantic. It’s particularly bad in Germany. In a BBC survey last month, for example, Germans were among the Europeans with the least favorable views of Israel, second only to Spain. Even the respondents in the United Arab Emirates had a more positive perception of the Jewish state than Germans did.
This may be surprising given that Berlin is considered one of Israel’s more reliable allies in Europe. Successive German governments have justified the “special” relationship with Israel by pointing to the countries’ “special” history. In light of the Holocaust, Germany seems to have no choice but to support the Jewish state. Former Green Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer advocated this policy of “historical responsibility” as effortlessly as Christian-Democratic Chancellor Angela Merkel does.
But guilt is an unhealthy basis for a relationship; it easily turns into resentment. This may help explain why so many Germans – 30% according to last year’s survey by Bertelsmann Foundation – are so eager to compare Israel to fascist Germany. If it were true that Israelis are modern-day Nazis, there would be less reason to feel guilty about the real Nazis.
Historical obligations also tend to have a statute of limitations. As the policy-defining event fades into the past, so will the rationale to stand by the Jewish state. Postwar Germans may reasonably reject any special obligations to Israel as a result of crimes committed before they were born.
This brings us to the fundamental problem with Berlin’s Israel policy. It implies that had there been no Holocaust, Israel would have no right to exist or, at least would have no reason to expect Germany’s support. Israel’s detractors take this argument one step further, claiming it was immoral to establish a Jewish state in the Middle East to atone for European crimes.
Churchill debunked the idea that Israel could be justified only as reparation for past atrocities long before the Holocaust: “The Jews are in Palestine by right and not by sufferance,” he said in 1922. Europe and Germany should thus be able to support Israel not just because of past wrongs committed against Jews but because of Jews’ inalienable right to a state in their ancestral homeland.
Israel’s right to exist doesn’t mean Germans must automatically back it. There has to be some special bond between nations to prompt support in difficult times. Such alliances are usually forged around common interests and values. As the Mideast’s most vibrant democracy, it would appear that Israel qualifies for a truly “special relationship.”
But unlike Americans, German officials almost never argue that Israel deserves solidarity as a Western ally. While Americans generally see Israel as a fellow democracy under attack from terrorists, in Germany and much of the rest of Europe, Israel is more often seen as a human-rights violator.
What explains this difference in perceptions? The U.S media are not that much better in presenting a more balanced view of the Middle East conflict than their European counterparts. More likely, Americans are simply less disposed to believe the worst of Israel.
A key factor is Americans’ appreciation of their Judeo-Christian heritage. While this is a common term in the U.S., and not only among religious people, it is a novel concept in Europe. Only recently has it found its way into the vocabulary of a few conservative Germans. Ms. Merkel and a few colleagues from Poland and Italy wanted to add a reference to the Continent’s Judeo-Christian heritage to Europe’s proposed constitution. The idea was rejected as too divisive, not only to seculars but also to other religions.
But the term does not just cover the moral standards shared by Judaism and Christianity. Its meaning goes beyond matters of faith. It describes the fact that next to the Greco-Roman heritage, the Judeo-Christian tradition is the other main pillar of Western civilization. Acknowledging this basic truth helps Americans to view Jews as part of that civilization and the Jewish state as part of the broader Western alliance.
In post-Christian Europe and Germany, this realization is largely missing. Moses’ law, the foundation for Western legal codes and moral values, is hardly acknowledged on the Continent. Jews are more often seen as having contributed to Western civilization – as individual scientists or artists – rather than being an integral part of it thanks to the role they played as a nation. Jews – often viewed as some kind of guest contributors – thus remain strangers in Europe, as does the Jewish state. And one is more inclined to believe bad things about strangers than about people one feels close to.
Given the similar threats Europe and Israel face from Islamic terror and a nuclear Iran, an alliance between them would seem natural. But as long as Europe’s public considers Israel more as part of the problem than as part of the solution, any such alliance will suffer. It’s time for German and European officials to make the real case for Israel – that of solidarity with an embattled ally.
THE REBIRTH OF ISRAEL
The Birth of a Nation, 1948
By Ruth Gruber
The New York Times (op-ed page)
May 18, 2008
IT was Friday, May 14, 1948. I was sitting in the press section of the United Nations General Assembly in its temporary quarters at Flushing Meadow in Queens. I felt my heart thumping. We journalists were waiting impatiently to see who would win a tug of war taking place in Washington.
On one side was President Harry S. Truman, who had told his aides that, with the last British troops leaving Palestine that day, he believed the Jews had a right to declare their own nation, and that he would make sure that the United States would be the first country to recognize it.
On the other side was the State Department, which wanted the land placed in a trusteeship under the United Nations. Secretary of State George Marshall was so passionate in his opposition to a Jewish state that he threatened to vote against the president in the November election. For Truman, who had come to office with the death of Franklin Roosevelt three years earlier, this was to be one of his first true tests of power.
As I sat waiting for the announcement of the decision in Washington, my mind wandered back to the spring and summer of the year before, which I had spent reporting for The New York Herald Tribune. I had traveled in Germany and Austria with the 11 members of the United Nations Special Committee on Palestine. There had been many such committees studying the problems of the Holy Land since the Arab riots of the 1920s; this one was distinguished by having no representatives from Britain, which had been universally hostile to the Zionist cause.
With the members, I visited the camps for displaced persons in Germany and Austria and listened, dumbfounded, as the refugees described the horrors of the war. In particular, I remember visiting the Rothschild Hospital camp in Vienna. Some 100 refugees had just arrived from Romania, many of them children covered with sores and dirt. There was no place to put them but the street; they lay, exhausted, on the paving stones.
A young man approached us, his eyes bloodshot. “In Romania, they killed 30,000 Jews in two hours,” he said, his voice sounding as if it came straight from his guts. “They took Jews to the slaughterhouse and hung them alive the way they hang cows, and they put knives to their throats and split them. Underneath them, they put a sign: Kosher Beef.”
In camp after camp, the committee members asked, “Why do you want to go to Palestine? It’s such a poor country. The Arabs and Jews are always fighting. They don’t have enough food, they don’t have enough water. What is it about Palestine?”
A 16-year-old orphan – actually, we never used the word “orphan” because the term couldn’t convey the horrors these children had been through – gave the most poignant answer. “Everybody has a home,” he said. “The Americans. The British. The French. The Russians. Only we don’t have a home. Don’t ask us. Ask the world.”
A woman tugged the sleeve of my jacket. “You are the only woman with all these men,” she implored. “You will understand me. I saw my husband burned. I don’t want to burn. I want to go home – to Eretz Israel.” The Land of Israel.
“That’s why we’re here,” I told her. “To help solve the problem. But if, Heaven forbid, we fail to find a solution, where would you like to go?”
Her reply: “Back to the crematory.”
It was this committee’s report that led directly to the General Assembly vote of Nov. 29, 1947, to partition Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab entities. The Jews accepted this proposal, but the Arabs stormed out and threatened war.
***
My mind was drawn immediately back to the present of May 1948 as I noticed an American representative to the United Nations, Philip Jessup, hurrying toward the podium. I knew, after talking to his aides, that in his hand he had a speech supporting trusteeship, not statehood, for Israel. The State Department was about to betray the president.
Jessup was halfway up the stairs when an Associated Press reporter handed him a dispatch. Jessup read it, grew white-faced, descended the stairs and then disappeared. The reporter next to me said, “He’s gone to the bathroom.”
I shook my head. “He’s gone home.”
Then we were handed the A.P. report. In Tel Aviv, David Ben-Gurion had just read the world’s latest proclamation of independence. Eleven minutes later, Harry Truman had recognized Ben-Gurion’s government as the “de facto authority” of the new state.
Israel was born.
A MASTERS DEGREE IN ISRAELI STUDIES IS PROVING POPULAR AMONG STUDENTS AT A PALESTINIAN UNIVERSITY
Learn about your enemy: A masters degree in Israeli studies is proving popular among students at a Palestinian university
By Nathan Jeffay
The Guardian (Weekly education supplement)
May 6, 2008
“It had nothing, and in a very short period has built this very strong economy. We should be amazed by this,” says Azizha Noful. She is talking about Israel, which celebrates its 60th anniversary on Thursday.
You will hear many comments like this on Thursday at the many Israel 60 gatherings taking place across the world. After all, this is a classic observation of Israel’s supporters, and one that always dominates discussions at Independence Day events.
What is surprising, though, is that Noful is a Palestinian whose husband is a prisoner in Israel, and she wants an end to the country’s existence. So why is she praising Israel’s achievements?
The answer is that she one of a growing number of Palestinians who want to study Israel. Noful is a student on the fast-growing Israel studies course at the Palestinian Al-Quds University. Between the university’s West Bank and Gaza campuses, the two-year masters degree has more than 100 students – reflecting a year-on-year growth of about 10% since 2005.
At Al-Quds, scholarship and the Palestinian struggle are closely related. For example, one of the law courses involves running human rights clinics in the hope students will “play a role in the struggle for change” in “occupied Palestine”.
PECULIAR SETTING
The university fears confiscation of part of its campus for road building by Israel, and in 2002, Israeli forces closed an administration building, confiscating files, academic documents and computers. Student politics tends to be radical, and the university union goes through periods of Hamas control.
Professor Mohammed Dajani, director of Al-Quds’s Area Studies Institute, which runs the Israel studies course, admits his university is a peculiar setting for this subject. He point out that Palestinian identity has largely been synonymous with “a general Arab policy to shut Israel out of Arab memory” and ignore its existence as far as possible.
However, he says, this has been changing since the start of the occupation in 1967. “Before the 1967 war, Palestinians, like the rest of the Arab world, knew nothing about Israel and Judaism. Then in June 1967, Israeli occupation brought a dramatic shift and Palestinians were shocked to find out how much Israelis knew about the Arab world and how little they knew about them. Though Arab interest in Israel grew tremendously, only a few Arab institutions and publishers reflected objectivity in dealing with the topic.” The few courses and books that did deal with Israel were polemics that viewed Israel as an aggressor.
The Al-Quds course set out to remedy this. Every student takes an in-depth course in Zionist thought and history, and Hebrew language is compulsory, as is studying the Israeli political system, the economy and social structure. Electives and dissertations involve detailed study of niche issues in Israeli society, including women’s issues, ethnicity, divisions between Jews of eastern and western origins, the judicial system, the Israel Defence Forces and the status of Palestinian Arabs.
Given that it is covering new ground for the Arab world, the course faces a lack of Arabic-language texts and so uses Israeli scholarship in Hebrew or in English translation. Perhaps surprisingly, students haven’t objected to the use of Israeli texts, says Dajani.
Teaching Zionism presents one of the course’s biggest challenges, says Professor Mohammad Massalha, who is charged with this task. “We are dealing with people who, on a daily basis, face the result of Zionism. It is very difficult to teach about Zionism academically. But my job is to make as much of an artificial separation between the personal level and the academic level as possible.”
Massalha begins by studying the theory of ideologies as a general subject, and then moves on to considering how Zionism fits and breaks the mould of other ideologies. “This way, we have a model for trying to understand Zionism with some objectivity.” As for why students want to reach this kind of objectivity about Zionism and Israel, motivations vary. More than half are officials in the Palestinian Authority. They range from relatively junior officials to the top-ranking Jibril Rajoub and they all believe that increased knowledge will help their work.
For some, like Noful, it is about acquiring knowledge as power. She says: “Every Palestinian has to know about them [Israelis] - it is important to know about our enemy. As my mother says, if you want to face your enemy, know his language.”
LEARNING PROCESS
She also believes that Palestinians will eventually set up their own state and will do so more effectively if they learn from Israel’s successes. “Israelis are great developers and we can learn from everything they are doing,” she says.
However, she insists that this learning process must take place from a safe distance and shuns dialogue. “We have to know about Israel but not forget they are our enemy. I can’t be on good relations with my enemy.”
Others, like 32-year-old Ramallah resident Sameh Khader, assistant to the secretary of the PLO executive committee, take the opposite view, and hope that their studies will facilitate coexistence and help bring peace. “For me it’s not about knowing the enemy. I want to live peacefully with our neighbours and believe that to do that we need to understand them,” says Khader.
Israeli academic Mordechai Kedar, an Arabic-speaking political scientist at the Israeli Bar Ilan University, says that the success of the course shows a thirst for knowledge about Israel across the Arab world. He is in demand as an Israeli guest on al-Jazeera and other Arabic TV stations and as a writer on Arabic websites. He recently received an offer of a two-year visiting professorship in the Gulf to teach about Israel and Judaism.
“When I publish articles on Arabic websites, I get at least two or three queries every day, from people wanting to know how Israelis think and what life is really like in Israel,” he says.
“While some are trying to convert me to Islam, many don’t like Israel, Israelis or Jews but want to know more. I spend an hour or two every day exchanging mails with these people.
“With satellite TV and the web the Arab world is much more open today than it was, and while this has not brought a desire to accept Israel, it has brought a desire to better understand it.”
* Egypt’s culture minister, tipped to be the next head of UNESCO, says he would burn Israeli books himself
* Gaza cancer patient who media blamed Israel for killing, miraculously returns to life
* British TV star’s mother-in law murdered by Hamas; press ignores it
* Military Intelligence chief: Rockets could hit Beersheba in 2 years
CONTENTS
1. Murdoch: European media hostility to Israel has anti-Semitic roots
2. Rupert, but not James, Murdoch: lifelong friend of Israel
3. Murdoch “impressed with the Israeli spirit and resilience”
4. Bush receives wild applause and standing ovations in Israel
5. Blair: Hamas to blame for Gaza fuel shortages
6. Australian PM considering legal action against Ahmadinejad for inciting genocide
7. Egyptian culture minister: I would burn Israeli books myself
8. Fatah claims Hamas attacked “nakba” rally in Jabalya
9. “Dead Gaza cancer patient” alive and kicking
10. Multiple casualties as rocket hits Ashkelon shopping center
11. The BBC, incapable of telling the truth
12. British TV star’s mother-in law murdered by Hamas
13. MI chief: Rockets could hit Beersheba in 2 years
14. Qassam rocket strikes Sderot synagogue
15. Bomb explodes at Christian school in Gaza
16. The most serious terrorist bombing you haven’t read about this week
[All notes below by Tom Gross]
MURDOCH: EUROPEAN MEDIA HOSTILITY TO ISRAEL HAS ANTI-SEMITIC ROOTS
A “pretty strong degree of anti-Semitism” in Europe is at the root of the hostile coverage Israel receives in parts of the European media, media mogul Rupert Murdoch said on Thursday.
Murdoch, owner of broadcasting and print media throughout the world, was in Israel as part of the state’s 60th birthday celebrations. He made the comments in an interview with The Jerusalem Post.
Murdoch added: “If you go to the BBC, the French press, places like that – they start as hostile, and it’s very difficult to overcome. But you’ve just got to press on and do what you can.”
Almost the only prominent media in the world that give Israel a fair hearing are those belonging to Murdoch: Fox TV, The New York Post, The Wall Street Journal, the British tabloid The Sun. Even Murdoch, however, has at times had to struggle to keep some blatantly anti-Israel coverage, occasionally bordering on the anti-Semitic, out of his European media, which includes the Sky News network and The Times of London.
And the Fox News ticker tape refers to Palestinian terrorists who bomb Israeli towns as “militants,” while terrorists elsewhere in the world are referred to by it as terrorists.
RUPERT, BUT NOT JAMES, MURDOCH: LIFELONG FRIEND OF ISRAEL
As I have noted before on this list, Murdoch has been a lifelong friend of Israel. See, for example, the introduction to this dispatch: Hollywood stars blast Nasrallah, but Spielberg, Streisand and others remain silent (Aug. 20, 2006).
Less pro-Israel is his son and presumptive heir James Murdoch. This may have been an isolated incident, but James Murdoch once referred to the “fucking Israelis” in a meeting with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair. The revelation was made last year in book published by Blair’s top aide, Alastair Campbell, who was in the room with Blair and the Murdochs when the exchange took place.
The prime minister’s aide said James Murdoch’s outburst drew a rebuke from his father, who said “he didn’t think he should talk like that in the prime minister’s house.”
“James got very apologetic with [Blair], who said not to worry, I hear far worse [about Israel] all the time,” Campbell wrote.
James Murdoch heads News Corp.’s BSkyB satellite broadcasting division.
MURDOCH “IMPRESSED WITH THE ISRAELI SPIRIT AND RESILIENCE”
Rupert Murdoch was in Israel last week for Shimon Peres’s “Facing Tomorrow” presidential conference.
In a briefing that I attended in Jerusalem, Murdoch praised Israel for using its “human capital to make up for the lack of natural resources and help carve a modern society and a technological leader out of desert.”
To help maximize that Israeli human capital, he said he would join a task force that would explore setting up a new Jerusalem high school for technological excellence together with Mort Zuckerman, owner of the (rival) (New York) Daily News, and Leslie Wexner, owner of Victoria’s Secret and other clothing chains.
Murdoch, 77, also said he has spent two days before the conference “privately walking the streets of Tel Aviv and Jerusalem” and had been very impressed with the Israeli spirit and resilience and the progress the country had made.
However, he noted, “Israel has this huge problem of hostile neighbors, financed and promoted by an Iran which has unlimited money and is led by Islamic extremism.”
“Islamic extremism is going to be around for a long time,” he added. “The greatest danger is if nuclear weapons were to fall into the hands of nongovernment extremists, who wouldn’t hesitate to put a bomb onto Tel Aviv or New York City. That’s by far the biggest danger to the world.”
***
Last time I praised Rupert Murdoch on this website, I received several anti-Semitic emails attacking him, also charging that he “is of Jewish descent.” For the record, he is not. As a young man in Australia he also went out of his way to help aboriginal victims of injustice long before it became fashionable to do so.
***
The enormous conference, masterly put together by Shimon Peres, was packed with interesting discussions from high profile speakers ranging from Mikhail Gorbachev to Vaclav Havel, to many Nobel prize winners, and the heads of Google, Yahoo, My Space and many other top companies. Yet it was largely ignored by the international media.
BUSH RECEIVES STANDING OVATIONS IN ISRAEL
The full content of U.S. President George W. Bush’s speeches in Israel last week went largely unreported because Barack Obama and his supporters stole the media limelight by claiming that Bush was talking about Obama, even though not by name.
Bush made some important observations, especially in his speech to the Knesset. His words are all the more significant because Bush’s political career is almost over. He no longer needs campaign support, and in all likelihood he meant every word he said.
In his speeches in Israel, including the one I attended, Bush received several standing ovations.
Sounding like he did in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, he told the Knesset that the fight against terror and extremism was “the defining challenge of our time.”
“THE KILLERS CLAIM THE MANTLE OF ISLAM, BUT THEY ARE NOT RELIGIOUS MEN”
Bush said: “It is more than a clash of arms. It is a clash of visions, a great ideological struggle. On one side are those who defend the ideals of justice and dignity with the power of reason and truth. On the other side are those who pursue a narrow vision of cruelty and control by committing murder, inciting fear, and spreading lies.
“... The killers claim the mantle of Islam, but they are not religious men. No one who prays to the God of Abraham could strap a suicide vest to an innocent child, or blow up guiltless guests at a Passover Seder, or fly planes into office buildings filled with unsuspecting workers.”
Regarding Israel, he said: “The Jewish people endured the agony of the pogroms, the tragedy of the Great War, and the horror of the Holocaust – what Elie Wiesel called ‘the kingdom of the night.’ ... Yet in spite of the violence, in defiance of the threats, Israel has built a thriving democracy...”
“THIS IS A TIRED ARGUMENT AND AMERICA REJECTS IT UTTERLY”
“Earlier today,” continued Bush, “I visited Masada, an inspiring monument to courage and sacrifice. At this historic site, Israeli soldiers swear an oath: ‘Masada shall never fall again.’ Citizens of Israel: Masada shall never fall again, and America will always stand with you.”
Israel, he said, has the right to protect itself and no one should force it to negotiate with those who wanted to destroy it. He criticized, without mentioning them by name, the Carters and Walts and Mearsheimers who say that if the U.S. would just break with Israel, all its problems would somehow disappear.
“This is a tired argument that buys into the propaganda of our enemies, and America rejects it utterly,” Bush said. “Israel’s population may be just over seven million. But when you confront terror and evil, you are 307 million strong, because America stands with you.”
BLAIR: HAMAS TO BLAME FOR GAZA FUEL SHORTAGES
Also in Israel last week, former British Prime Minister and Quartet peace envoy Tony Blair implied, as I have done on many occasions this year, that the international media was falsely blaming Israel for the fuel shortages in Gaza.
In an interview with The Jerusalem Post, he said: “It is important to emphasize to the outside world – and most people don’t understand – that we’re trying to urge Israel to get fuel into Gaza, and then the extremists come and kill the people bringing the fuel in. It’s a crazy situation.”
AUSTRALIAN PM CONSIDERING LEGAL ACTION AGAINST AHMADINEJAD FOR INCITING GENOCIDE
Australia is considering taking Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to the International Court of Justice in The Hague for inciting genocide against Israel, Australia’s prime minister Kevin Rudd said.
“The Iranian president’s repeated extraordinary statements, which are anti-Semitic and expressing a determination to eliminate the state of Israel from the map, are appalling by any standards of current international relations,” he told Britain’s Sky News network last Thursday.
Rudd said Ahmadinejad’s repeated comments were “dangerous stuff.” “It’s not just hyperbole from the bully pulpit of Tehran, it’s the roll-on effect across the Islamic world, particularly those who listen to Iran for their guidance,” he warned.
Australian Attorney-General Robert McClelland confirmed to The Australian newspaper that the government was seeking legal advice on taking Ahmadinejad to the International Court of Justice.
EGYPTIAN CULTURE MINISTER: I WOULD BURN ISRAELI BOOKS MYSELF
Israel has filed a complaint with the United Nations’ education, science and cultural organization (UNESCO) after Egyptian Culture Minister Farouk Hosni told the Egyptian Parliament last week that “I would burn Israeli books myself if found in Egyptian libraries.”
Hosni is a favorite to be appointed the next UNESCO secretary-general, and Israel says it would be a sad day for UNESCO if he gets the job.
Today, Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni is scheduled to leave for Sharm al-Sheikh in order to participate in a summit with U.S. President Bush, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, Jordan’s King Abdullah and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. She said she is likely to raise the issue in her discussions with Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit.
Hosni also said he would oppose an initiative presented by the American Jewish Committee to establish a museum of Jewish antiquity and culture in Cairo. Jews had a long and rich history in Egypt until they were forced out following the creation of Israel.
FATAH CLAIMS HAMAS ATTACKED “NAKBA” RALLY IN JABALYA
Fatah claimed on Thursday that Hamas attacked a rally to mark the sixtieth anniversary of the Palestinian “nakba” (the creation of Israel) in Jabalya in the northern Gaza Strip. The official Palestinian news agency Wafa reported that more than 30 participants in the rally were injured by gunshot wounds or as a result of being beaten with clubs.
Fatah’s spokesperson in the West Bank, Fahmi Za’arir, told the Palestinian-run Ma’an news agency that Hamas members assaulted the participants, specifically women. “This represents the continuation of the coup that Hamas staged in the Gaza Strip, and it came on a special day in which all Palestinian forces united to mark the sixtieth anniversary of the Palestinian nakba,” he said.
“DEAD GAZA CANCER PATIENT” ALIVE AND KICKING
Muhammad al-Harrani, a father of six from Gaza diagnosed with cancer who reportedly died while waiting for a permit to enter Israel, has miraculously come back to life.
On the eve of Holocaust Remembrance Day, al-Harrani’s story was widely publicized in the international media after his family told the “Physicians for Human Rights” organization that he had died. (Physicians for Human Rights is one of many leftist Israeli NGOs constantly berating Israel to the international media.)
“The sick man could not withstand the wait for the permit,” Ran Yaron, Director of the Occupied Territories Department, was reported by western media as saying, adding that he blamed the Israeli government for adopting “cruel policies against cancer patients.”
But al-Harrani last week admitted that his family had deliberately lied, after he turned up for radiation and chemotherapy treatment at the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center.
When questioned by the Israeli tabloid Yediot Ahronot, Physicians for Human Rights admitted that they had been too quick to believe what they were told by Palestinian families without verifying the information from independent hospital sources.
[Readers of Israeli media will of course be familiar with the next two items; but since they were virtually ignored by the international media, I write about them here for those who do not know about them.]
MULTIPLE CASUALTIES AS ROCKET HITS ASHKELON SHOPPING CENTER
Dozens of Israelis were injured on Wednesday evening, including a mother and her 2-year-old daughter who were seriously hurt, when a rocket fired from Gaza hit the crowded Hutzot Shopping Center in the southern Israeli city of Ashkelon.
The rocket hit the third floor of the building, where offices and a medical center are located, and a large part of the shopping center was destroyed.
Several people were trapped in the rubble and rescue services worked frantically to free them from the debris. Fifteen people were badly injured and 87 people were treated for minor injuries and shock. The cafeteria of Barzilai Hospital in central Ashkelon was turned into a makeshift clinic because the hospital wasn’t big enough to tend to all the injured.
The attack came as Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and U.S. President George W. Bush were meeting in Jerusalem.
The injured baby has now regained consciousness. She has undergone several operations to remove shrapnel from various places in her body, while doctors are waiting for her condition to stabilize further before they attempt to remove shards of shrapnel that pierced her head.
Uri Bar-Lev, the police commander of Israel’s southern district (and who is also a subscriber to this email list), said bomb experts had determined beyond any doubt that the rocket was of Iranian origin.
THE BBC, INCAPABLE OF TELLING THE TRUTH
When the BBC finally mentioned the attack after hours of protests in the UK from pro-Israel individuals (including subscribers to this list) about why they had not reported it, they tagged it on to the end of a story about Palestinian suffering, using the following line: “A rocket reportedly fired from Gaza hit a shopping center in the Israeli city of Ashkelon, officials say.”
In fact, the rocket (1) was fired from Gaza (Hamas admitted this), not “reportedly,” and (2) Ashkelon was hit, not “officials say”. But it is many years since the BBC, the world’s largest news network, reported honestly on the Middle East.
Here are some photos of the attack, and here are some more. Hardly any of these kind of photos appeared in the mainstream international press.
BRITISH TV STAR’S MOTHER-IN LAW MURDERED BY HAMAS
This latest attack in Ashkelon comes at the end of a deadly week in southern Israel, in which two Israelis were killed and many injured in an ongoing barrage of Qassam rockets and mortar shells.
Last Wednesday, 69-year-old Shuli Katz, from Kibbutz Gevaram, was killed as she visited her sister-in-law in Moshav Yesha, only days after father-of-three Jimmy Kedoshim was killed as he tended to his garden in a neighboring kibbutz, Kfar Aza.
Shuli Katz, who was born and grew up on the kibbutz, worked for 35 years as a nurse. She left four children and five grandchildren.
Even though President Bush was about to arrive in Israel, and even though Katz was the mother-in-law of famed British TV comedian Paul Kaye, her death was barely mentioned in the international media.
Kaye said: “To think that the Palestinians were handing out sweets in Gaza after the attack, it’s sick. The idea of people celebrating Shuli’s death is just too awful. She was such a gentle and beautiful lady who loved helping people in her work as a nurse and you just can’t imagine her having such a violent end.”
***
The Israeli media and public has been reacting with fury against the Israeli government for its inaction following attacks from Gaza. Yediot Ahronot, Israel’s most popular daily, said in an editorial that “The Government has forgotten that it has a central mission: To safeguard the state’s citizens and not try to satisfy the Americans, Egyptians and Europeans.”
MI CHIEF: ROCKETS COULD HIT BEERSHEBA IN 2 YEARS
Israel’s Military Intelligence chief Amos Yadlin has told Ha’aretz that in two years time Hamas’ Iranian-supplied rockets would be capable of reaching Beersheba, one of Israel’s largest cities.
On the likelihood of agreeing on a lull (tahadiyeh) in the fighting with Hamas, with Egyptian mediation, Yadlin said that “the tahadiyeh, as agreed between [Egyptian intelligence chief] Omar Suleiman and Hamas perhaps solves the problem of terror from Gaza for the short term. But in the long term, it does not provide an answer to the ongoing smuggling or the Hamas buildup of a substantial arsenal.”
QASSAM ROCKET STRIKES SDEROT SYNAGOGUE
Three Qassam rockets were fired into the western Negev town of Sderot from the Gaza Strip on Thursday evening, one of which struck a synagogue, causing extensive damage to the building but no casualties. Several passersby were treated for shock.
BOMB EXPLODES AT CHRISTIAN SCHOOL IN GAZA
Unknown assailants detonated a bomb outside a Christian school in Gaza City before dawn on Friday, the latest in a string of attacks on Christian institutions in Gaza. The powerful explosion was heard in surrounding neighborhoods at around 4 am. Damage was visible at the entrance to the Zahwa Rosary School, which is run by Catholic nuns but caters mainly to Muslim students.
Two nuns were in their convent adjacent to the school when the bomb went off, a school official said. The official declined to be named, saying she was frightened by the incident and concerned for her safety.
The school had been ransacked in June 2007, along with the nuns’ adjacent convent, during the week Hamas seized power in Gaza.
The bombing was the latest in a string of attacks on Christian institutions in the historically Jewish but now overwhelmingly Muslim territory. In one attack, a local Christian activist was murdered in October. His killers have not been found.
(For background on attacks on Christians by Muslims in Gaza and the West Bank, please see previous dispatches on this website.)
THE MOST SERIOUS TERRORIST BOMBING YOU HAVEN’T READ ABOUT THIS WEEK
In an editorial, The Wall Street Journal Asia asks why the terrorist attacks that killed 61 people and wounded more than 200 in Jaipur, India, last Tuesday was barely reported upon. Was it, the paper wonders, because the perpetrators were Islamic Jihadists?
The paper notes: “Like other free nations, India is under severe and growing threat from Islamic jihadists, and has been for decades. New groups such as the Indian Mujahedeen, which yesterday claimed responsibility for the Jaipur attacks, appear regularly. More than 1,000 people died in India last year from terrorists attacks by Islamists and others. Only Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan suffered more casualties over the same period.
“... Jaipuris saw the face of terror this week. But as in New York, Bali, London, Madrid, Mumbai and elsewhere, the bombings in Jaipur represent an attack on the values democracies hold dear by those who would impose their fanaticism on all of us.”
* Canadian PM Harper: Much criticism of Israel is thinly-veiled anti-Semitism
* Al-Akhbar: “Washington has given Israel green light to invade Gaza”
* Shell that killed Jimmy Kedoshim came from Iran
* Qassam explodes near school bus packed with children
CONTENTS
1. Canadian PM: Much criticism of Israel is thinly-veiled anti-Semitism
2. British PM Brown: Israel’s creation one of the 20th century’s “greatest achievements”
3. Parting gift: “Bush set to offer Israel crucial new radar system”
4. Bush and Cheney remain great friends of Israel, despite unpopularity among U.S. Jews
5. Shell that killed Jimmy Kedoshim came from Iran
6. Qassam explodes near school bus carrying children
7. Al-Akhbar: Washington has given Israel green light to invade Gaza
8. Jordan bans “Nakba” commemorations
9. Rafsanjani blames Jews for Holocaust
10. Ahmadinejad: Israel is a “stinking corpse” doomed to disappear
11. Ahmadinejad criticized for saying long-ago 12th Imam leads Iran
12. These business visionaries know when to back a winner
13. Assad: Syria won’t cut Iran, Hamas or Hizbullah ties for deal with Israel
14. Former Guantanamo prisoner takes part in suicide attack
15. “What Spain was in 1936; Lebanon is today”
[All notes below by Tom Gross]
CANADIAN PM: MUCH CRITICISM OF ISRAEL IS THINLY-VEILED ANTI-SEMITISM
“Some of the criticism brewing in Canada against the state of Israel, including from some members of Parliament, is similar to the attitude of Nazi Germany in the Second World War,” Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper warned last Thursday.
“I guess my fear is what I see happening in some circles is an anti-Israeli sentiment, really just as a thinly disguised veil for good old-fashioned anti-Semitism, which is completely unacceptable,” Harper said in an interview with CJAD/CFRB radio.
“We learned in the Second World War that those who would hate and destroy the Jewish people would ultimately hate and destroy the rest of us as well, and the same holds today.”
(Report from The Ottawa Citizen here.)
BRITISH PM BROWN: ISRAEL’S CREATION ONE OF THE 20TH CENTURY’S “GREATEST ACHIEVEMENTS”
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown has congratulated Israel on its 60th anniversary, calling the state’s creation one of the “greatest achievements” of the 20th century.
One should not, however, confuse the attitude of Brown, who is a lifelong friend of Israel – as his father (a Church of Scotland minister) was before him – with the attitude of many British journalists and academics who are lifelong haters of Israel (as in many cases, their fathers were anti-Semites before them).
“Many articles in papers like The Guardian and The Independent have become so stridently anti-Israel that it is difficult to distinguish them from anti-Semitism,” a British Muslim who subscribes to this list said to me last week.
For example, Johann Hari, an award-winning columnist for The Independent, for the second week in a row has written a column so dripping in hatred for Israel, and so packed with misinformation, that even one of his fellow columnists for The Independent, Howard Jacobson, devoted his column this past weekend to criticizing Hari (although Jacobson only dealt with part of what was wrong with Hari’s piece).
I am not going to waste my time further critiquing this latest hateful polemic from Hari – or “Dirty Hari” as British commentator Richard Littlejohn has now called him. You can read my previous item on Hari here: Journalist of the year calls Israel “shit,” as Israel marks Holocaust Memorial Day
***
There have been many other programs in Britain and elsewhere in the last week, rife with anti-Israel propaganda and revisionist history. For example, the documentary by the BBC’s Middle East editor, Jeremy Bowen, titled “The Birth of Israel,” has been widely criticized. Even such a moderate commentator as Alex Brummer, the Business Editor of The Daily Mail, wrote last week: “The shameful thing is that the revisionist historians have bought into ‘Arab disinformation’. After watching the BBC program the Birth of Israel and delving into the press coverage, one recognizes how corrosive this process has become.”
PARTING GIFT: “BUSH SET TO OFFER ISRAEL CRUCIAL NEW RADAR”
With new intelligence reports estimating that Iran may have a nuclear weapon by the summer of next year, the Bush administration appears ready to offer Israel a powerful new radar system capable of tracking baseball-sized objects from 2,900 miles away.
While it is not clear that the system could stop a nuclear weapon, it would greatly boost Israeli defenses against ballistic missiles in general while tying it directly into a growing U.S. ballistic missile shield. (Other locations are slated to be the Czech Republic, eastern Turkey, and possibly Georgia.)
President George W. Bush is expected to discuss the matter during his visit to Israel on Wednesday. The initiative has been spearheaded by Rep. Mark Kirk, an Illinois Republican, and Rep. Jane Harman, a California Democrat.
The system, known as a forward-based X-band radar, would let Israel’s Arrow missile defenses engage a Shahab-3 ballistic missile about halfway through what would be its 11-minute flight path from Iran to Israel, or six times sooner than Israel’s “Green Pine” Radar is currently able to do.
In the last year, Iran has expanded its ballistic missile program. In November, Iran tested a new “Ashura” long-range ballistic missile – an upgrade to the “Shahab-3” – capable of hitting Israel and Europe within minutes of launch.
BUSH AND CHENEY REMAIN GREAT FRIENDS OF ISRAEL, DESPITE UNPOPULARITY AMONG U.S. JEWS
Sources added that Bush and his vice-president Dick Cheney, generally regarded as the best friends Israel has ever had in the White House, wish to rush through as much defense cooperation for Israel as possible, fearful that a Barack Obama presidency could severely curtail military and other aid for Israel.
Cheney said last week: “America’s commitment to Israel’s security is enduring and unshakable, as is our commitment to Israel’s right to defend itself always against terrorism, rocket attacks and other threats from forces dedicated to Israel’s destruction. The United States under this administration will never pressure Israel to take steps that threaten its security.”
In spite of this, Bush and Cheney remain less popular among American Jews, according to opinion polls, than among the general population.
(Incidentally, last time I said something nice about Dick Cheney, I was named the “Worst Person in the Word” on MSNBC’s Countdown program with Keith Olbermann. Olbermann, true to form, misquoted me.)
SHELL THAT KILLED JIMMY KEDOSHIM CAME FROM IRAN
The mortar shell that killed Jimmy Kedoshim on Saturday came from Iran, according to ballistic experts. Kedoshim, a father of three, was murdered as he tended to his garden in the southern Israeli kibbutz of Kfar Aza. His house took a direct hit from the mortar fired from Gaza. Hamas proudly claimed responsibility for firing it.
Such is their bias, almost no western media have reported on the murder, let alone on the fact that Iran supplied the weapon.
During Saturday alone, at least 20 missiles were fired from Gaza towards Israeli homes. Among the buildings damaged were a synagogue and a building belonging to Sapir Academic College. No foreign religious leaders have condemned the bombing of the synagogue. And no foreign academics have condemned the shelling of Sapir College.
In February, a student was murdered by a Qassam rocket fired at Sapir College, which lies 40 minutes south of Tel Aviv. Until today, to my knowledge, there hasn’t been even one statement of sympathy from all those academics in Britain and elsewhere who never tire of expressing solidarity with Palestinian academics. This is so even though Palestinian campuses have never been targeted for a bomb attack, as the Hebrew University of Jerusalem was in 2002, for example, and Sapir College is now.
As a result of the incessant Qassam fire, over 40 percent of pupils have already fled the Sapir campus and stopped attending classes. Some 40 classrooms and one third of the laboratories are not in use, because they are deemed too vulnerable to rockets and too far from the bomb shelters.
Rockets from Gaza also landed in various other towns and kibbutzim over the weekend and a number of injured Israelis were evacuated to Barzilai Medical Center in Ashkelon.
QASSAMS EXPLODES NEAR SCHOOL BUS CARRYING CHILDREN
One of the Qassams that hit Israel’s Negev yesterday, exploded near a school bus packed with children, Ha’aretz (but not international media) reported. There were no casualties, but several children were treated for shock.
Two of the rockets fired on Sunday afternoon from Gaza, hit populated areas in Sha’ar Hanegev. Another again landed near Sapir College, damaging a local construction site.
This morning, a Qassam rocket hit a schoolyard in the Israeli city of Ashkelon just minutes before it would have been full of children.
AL-AKHBAR: WASHINGTON HAS GIVEN ISRAEL GREEN LIGHT TO INVADE GAZA
The Lebanese newspaper Al-Akhbar reported on Saturday that the United States has given Israel a green light to carry out a large-scale military attack against Hamas in the Gaza Strip, following President Bush’s visit this week.
The Israeli town of Sderot is now the most bombed town in the world. It has been hit with more rockets than the whole of London in the blitz. (For more on the situation in Sderot, please see previous dispatches including this one.)
Quoting anonymous sources, Al-Akhbar said that Israel sent an intelligence report to Washington, stressing the importance of military action to crack down on Palestinian military groups that have amassed an unprecedented level of weaponry in Gaza. Misusing international aid money, as well as funds from Iran, Hamas has recently managed to acquire a vast arsenal of weaponry, said the Lebanese paper.
Diplomatic sources told Al-Akhbar that Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Defense Minister Ehud Barak have been holding meetings about the timing and scope of an invasion of Gaza.
Israel pulled its forces from the streets of the Gaza Strip in 1994, and evacuated settlers in 2005. (For more, please scroll down here to see this photo montage: Exodus From Gaza.)
JORDAN BANS “NAKBA” COMMEMORATIONS
Jordanian authorities have banned all events marking the “Nakba,” or “Catastrophe,” as some Arabs refer to the independence of Israel 60 years ago.
Several pro-Palestinian groups and Jordanian opposition parties had been planning to hold a rally in Amman on Friday. But the authorities banned the event, as well as other “illegal public gatherings.”
Earlier this year, Jordan banned relatives of Ala Abu Dhaim, the Palestinian who murdered eight students and wounded many others at a Jewish religious school in Jerusalem on March 6, from mourning him in public.
Meanwhile, “Nakba” events are continuing elsewhere in the world. See, for example this poster advertising the University of California’s “Nakba” events (scroll down to see it).
RAFSANJANI BLAMES JEWS FOR HOLOCAUST
In a speech to mark “the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the Zionist regime,” former Iranian president Hashemi Rafsanjani blamed Jews for causing the Nazi Holocaust. He said that (what he claimed was) Jewish control of banks and the media had given Europeans no choice but to act. His remarks are in Persian here.
Unlike the current president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Rafsanjani didn’t actually deny the Holocaust took place. Rafsanjani has wrongly been described in some western media as a moderate Iranian leader.
AHMADINEJAD: ISRAEL IS A “STINKING CORPSE” DOOMED TO DISAPPEAR
Iran’s President Ahmadinejad on Thursday called Israel a “stinking corpse” which is doomed to disappear.
“Those who think they can revive the stinking corpse of the usurping and fake Israeli regime by throwing a birthday party are seriously mistaken,” Ahmadinejad was quoted by the official Iranian IRNA news agency.
“The Zionist entity [Israel] is on its way to annihilation,” he said. It “has reached the end like a dead rat after being slapped by the Lebanese” – a reference to the July-August 2006 war between Israel and the Iranian-controlled Hizbullah militia.
AHMADINEJAD CRITICIZED FOR SAYING LONG-AGO 12TH IMAM LEADS IRAN
Several leading Iranian clerics last week criticized President Ahmadinejad for saying that the last imam of Shi’ite Islam, a messianic figure who Shi’ites believe was hidden by God 1,140 years ago, leads modern-day Iran.
“We see his hand directing all the affairs of the country,” Ahmadinejad told theological students in the city of Mashad. “A movement has started for us to occupy ourselves with our global responsibilities. God willing, Iran will be the axis of the leadership of this movement,” he said.
Several clerics in the Iranian parliament accused Ahmadinejad of implying that Imam Mahdi or Imam Zaman (Imam of the Age), as the Shi’ite messiah is also called, supports his government. Since Ahmadinejad came to power in 2005, he has made the “hastening of the coming of Imam Mahdi” an important aim. Some experts fear Ahmadinejad may use nuclear weapons “to hasten the Imam’s arrival.”
THESE BUSINESS VISIONARIES KNOW WHEN TO BACK A WINNER, AND IN ISRAEL THEY SEE A WINNER
On Friday I was asked by The National Review “to write 200 or so words as part of a panel on Israel’s 60th birthday and what the future holds.” I wrote the following:
Even before Israel’s 60th-birthday celebrations began this week, there were those who once again were predicting doom and gloom for the Jewish state — and not just in Europe. In America, the cover of this month’s Atlantic magazine has a Star of David in Palestinian colors with the headline: “Is Israel finished?” In Canada, the cover of Maclean’s magazine has a montage of three Israeli soldiers unable to raise the national flag. The headline: “Why Israel Can’t Survive.”
This is all nonsense. Israel is flourishing. Indeed among the guests arriving in coming days are not only President Bush and political chieftains from 27 countries, but such front-rank business leaders as Rupert Murdoch, Google founder Sergey Brin, and Yahoo founder Terry Semel. Even Al Gore is turning up the week after.
These business visionaries know when to back a winner, and in Israel they see a winner. There is not a single major hi-tech company (IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Motorola, Hewlett Packard, Sun Microsystems, Google) that hasn’t now established an R & D center in Israel.
But there is one enormous problem: Iran. It is not only the Islamic regime’s nuclear threat but its support for the deadly militia Israel faces to its north (Hizbullah) and south (Hamas). Were the Iranian regime to crumble, Palestinian pragmatists might gain the upper hand, a responsible Palestinian state could be formed, and Israel’s future would indeed be rosy.
ASSAD: SYRIA WON’T CUT IRAN, HAMAS OR HIZBULLAH TIES FOR DEAL WITH ISRAEL
In an interview published on Friday with the Italian magazine L’Espresso, Syrian President Bashar Assad rejected Israel’s demand that Syria cut its ties with Iran and Hizbullah as part of any peace deal. He said that detaching his country from the two was “irrelevant” to reviving peace talks.
Syria maintains close ties with both Hizbullah, Hamas and Iran, all of which seek Israel’s destruction.
In recent days Hizbullah, copying tactics used by Hamas against Fatah in Gaza last year, have seized control of west Beirut from the more moderate, pro-Western Sunni government, in fighting that left many about 50 people dead. (For more, see the article below.)
The claim by Assad to the gullible Italian journalist that Hamas and Hizbullah don’t kill civilians is obvious nonsense. Assad said: “Syria remains firmly convinced that neither Hamas nor Hizbullah are terrorist organizations for the simple reason that they don’t kill civilians.”
FORMER GUANTANAMO PRISONER TAKES PART IN SUICIDE ATTACK
A former Kuwaiti detainee at the United States prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, who was released from U.S. custody, was involved in the suicide attack in Mosul, Iraq, on April 29, which killed six people.
This has been confirmed both by forensic experts examining the corpse and by a jihadist website, which wrote that Abdullah Saleh al-Ajmi was one of the “heroes” who took part in the suicide attack: “May God have mercy on you Abdullah al-Ajmi. We send you a warm greeting O you martyr, O you hero, O you, a man in a time where only few men are left,” said the website.
Al-Ajmi is not the first former Guantanamo detainee to return to terrorism.
-- Tom Gross
EXTRACTS
“WHAT SPAIN WAS IN 1936; LEBANON IS TODAY”
In a lengthy article published today, Middle East expert (and longtime subscriber to this email list) Barry Rubin warns the west to “wake up fast” to what is happening in Lebanon. The article is rather long to include here, so I have prepared some extracts.
“While America’s secretary of state devotes her time to doomed Israel-Palestinian talks and America goes ga-ga over a candidate whose main foreign policy strategy is to talk to dictators,” Lebanon is on the brink as the Iranian and Syrian-backed Hizbullah show who is in control.
“What Spain was in 1936; Lebanon is today,” writes Rubin. “Does anyone remember the Spanish Civil War? Briefly, a fascist revolt took place against the democratic government. The rebels were motivated by several factors, including anger that their religion had not been given enough respect and regional grievances, but essentially they sought to put their ideology and themselves into power. Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy backed the rebels with money and guns. The Western democracies stood by and did nothing. Guess who won? And guess whether that outcome led to peace or world war.
“... When Barack Obama says he will negotiate with Syria and Iran over Iraq’s future, he signals every Persian Gulf regime to cut its own deal with Iran. When his stances convince Hamas that he’s the guy for them; when Iran and Syria conclude they merely need stand defiant and wait until January 21 for any existing pressure vanishes, the U.S. position in the Middle East is being systematically destroyed.
“This does not make Obama the candidate favored by Arabs in general but only by the radicals. Egyptians, Jordanians, Gulf Arabs, and the majorities in Lebanon and Iraq are very worried. This is not just an Israel problem; it is one for all non-extremists in the region. If the dictators and terrorists are smiling, it means everyone else is crying.
“... For all those in the West who don’t like Israel, then at least help the people you pretend to like. Back the Lebanese government with real power and aid, covertly or overtly, those battling the radical forces in Lebanon.”
Rubin concludes with a passage from the move classic Casablanca:
Rick: “Sam, if it’s December 1941 in Casablanca, what time is it in New York?”
Sam: “Um, my watch stopped.”
Rick: “I bet they’re asleep in New York. I’ll bet they’re asleep all over America.”
* This is the first of three dispatches on Israel at 60.
CONTENTS
1. Israel’s friends
2. “Is Israel finished?”
3. Certainly not
4. The nasty BBC
5. Police storm Warsaw hotel room, free three captive Jewish teens
6. United Nations officials say they’re shocked – shocked!
7. Rice pushing for announcement of borders next week
8. “Happy birthday, Israel and Shalom” (By Andrew Roberts, Daily Express)
9. “Well done for surviving” (By Melanie Phillips, The Spectator)
ISRAEL’S FRIENDS
[Note by Tom Gross]
This evening Israel begins its 60th Independence Day celebrations. The celebrations continue into next week when President George W. Bush, together with present and former presidents, prime ministers and senior officials from 27 countries, will arrive at the invitation of Israeli President Shimon Peres.
Among others scheduled to be in Israel next week as part of the country’s birthday celebrations are: Rupert Murdoch, Google founder Sergey Brin, Yahoo founder Terry Semel, Vaclav Havel, Mikhail Gorbachev and Henry Kissinger.
Al Gore will also visit Israel on May 19, when he will open a Tel Aviv University conference on renewable energy.
Jewish left-wing celebrities are once again shunning Israel. (Barbra Streisand, for example, cancelled her invitation from Peres.) But non-Jewish actors such as Jon Voight will pay a solidarity visit to the rocket-battered town of Sderot next week. (Oscar-winner Voight played leading roles in Midnight Cowboy, Mission Impossible, and many other films.)
“IS ISRAEL FINISHED?” ...
Even before the celebrations have begun, much of the international media have been using Israel’s birthday as an excuse to once again attack the Jewish state.
For example, in America, the cover of The Atlantic magazine’s May edition has a Star of David painted in Palestinian colors of red, black and green. The headline asks: “Is Israel finished?”
In Canada, the cover of Maclean’s magazine’s May 5 edition has a montage of three Israeli soldiers struggling to raise the national flag. The headline reads: “Why Israel Can’t Survive.”
These and other articles aide the general efforts by people in the west, as well as in the Arab world, to destroy Israel.
... CERTAINLY NOT
But amidst the doom and gloom and outright hate and resentment of the world’s only Jewish state, some positive articles stand out.
The first article I attach below is by the distinguished British historian Andrew Roberts. It will be published in the coming days in The Daily Express, a mid-market British paper that tends to buck the anti-Israel trend of most of the British media.
Roberts writes:
“The State of Israel has packed more history into her sixty years on the planet than many other nations have in six hundred. There are many surprising things about this tiny, feisty, brave nation the size of Wales, but the most astonishing is that she has lived to see this birthday at all.
“... When during the Second World War, the island of Malta came through three terrible years of bombardment and destruction, it was rightly awarded the George Medal for bravery: today Israel should be awarded a similar decoration for defending democracy, tolerance and Western values against a murderous onslaught that has lasted twenty times as long.
“... ‘We owe to the Jews,’ wrote Winston Churchill in 1920, ‘a system of ethics which, even if it were entirely separated from the supernatural, would be incomparably the most precious possession of mankind, worth in fact the fruits of all wisdom and learning put together.’
“... Civilization owes Judaism a debt it can never repay, and support for the right of a Jewish homeland to exist is the bare minimum we can provide...”
(Roberts’s full piece, which I recommend reading, is below, followed by an article by Melanie Phillips. Both Roberts and Phillips are longtime subscribers to this email list.)
THE NASTY BBC
The Jew-baiting BBC has in recent days been running promos virtually every hour plugging their half hour special interview with Richard Falk. In each promo the BBC, citing Falk, compares Israel’s actions to those of the Nazis. Falk, a despicable man, is Professor Emeritus at Princeton University. (I previously mentioned Falk in this dispatch.)
As I have written before, The Guardian (and The Independent) are overwhelmingly the papers of choice for BBC news staff. For an example of what they so admire in The Guardian, please click here.
POLICE STORM WARSAW HOTEL ROOM, FREE 3 CAPTIVE JEWISH TEENS
This is a follow up to my “Holocaust Day” dispatch last week.
* A ceremony marking Holocaust Remembrance Day was interrupted shortly after it began in the southern Israeli town Sderot on Wednesday evening when two Qassam rockets landed in the vicinity and participants, including Holocaust survivors, ran for cover. The ceremony, which was being held outdoors opposite the town’s Holocaust memorial, was then moved to a sheltered indoor location at the request of residents. At least 15 rockets fell in Sderot during Holocaust day (and dozens more since then).
* The Associated Press reports that armed Polish police broke into a room at the Holiday Inn hotel in Warsaw on Monday and freed three Jewish teenagers who were being held captive by a 23-year-old man who claimed to have a bomb. The three 16-year-olds, from Brazil, had been in Poland to take part in the “March of the Living” at the site of Auschwitz-Birkenau on Holocaust Day last week. Polish police said the hostage-taker was the son of the Kuwaiti ambassador to Poland.
UNITED NATIONS OFFICIALS SAY THEY’RE SHOCKED – SHOCKED!
Reuters has revealed that the headmaster at one of the United Nations’ top prep schools in Gaza was also the chief rocket-maker for Islamic Jihad.
Israel has long accused the UN agency of complicity with senior Palestinian terrorists.
Reuters writes:
By day, Awad al-Qiq was a respected science teacher and headmaster at an UNRWA school in Gaza. By night, Palestinian militants say, he built rockets for Islamic Jihad. An Israeli air strike killed Qiq, 33, last week.
His family denied he had any militant links, despite a profusion of Islamic Jihad posters at his home. But militant leaders hailed him as a martyr who led Islamic Jihad’s “engineering unit.”
The full Reuters article is here. Few newspapers in the west have bothered to report this news, which ought to have grave implications about the nature of the UN.
One paper that did, The New York Post, asks:
So much for UNRWA’s self-proclaimed “zero-tolerance policy toward politics and militant activities.” Now the which, must explain how it let a high-ranking terrorist take charge of its Rafah Prep Boys School.
He was guilty, of course: Islamic Jihad actually ID’d him as “chief leader of the engineering [i.e., bomb-making] unit.” His home was bedecked with Islamic Jihad posters – and an Islamic Jihad flag was draped over his body at his funeral.
Indeed, Islamic Jihad gave him the ultimate sendoff tribute: firing a barrage of his rockets into Israel in mourning.
Of course, that policy was pretty well shown up as a joke when a UNRWA teacher named Saeed Seyam was named interior minister of the Hamas-led government in Gaza and immediately vowed never to arrest any Palestinian for “resisting the occupation.”
According to Rep. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), UNRWA confirmed last December that families of suicide bombers have received money from the agency. The United States, incidentally, pays 30 percent to 40 percent of UNRWA’s budget - $505 million last year alone.
***
Tom Gross adds: Local Palestinian UN workers have complained that no senior official from the UN attended Qiq’s funeral or paid their respects to the family, adding that Qiq’s widow and five children “had heard nothing about a UN pension.”
RICE PUSHING FOR ANNOUNCEMENT OF BORDERS NEXT WEEK
U.S. government sources tell me that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is pressing Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to announce an agreement on the final borders between Israel and a future state of Palestine next week.
Rice is apparently pushing for the move, both to coincide with the visit of President Bush and also to make as much headway as possible before Olmert might be neutralized by developments in the latest criminal investigation. Last Friday, Olmert was again questioned by Israeli police as part of a corruption investigation and there is speculation in Israel that he may have to resign soon.
-- Tom Gross
FULL ARTICLES
“THIS, DESPITE SO MANY OF THEIR GREATEST INTELLECTS DYING IN THE GAS CHAMBERS”
Happy birthday, Israel and Shalom
By Andrew Roberts
The Daily Express
May 2008
The State of Israel has packed more history into her sixty years on the planet – which she celebrates this week – than many other nations have in six hundred. There are many surprising things about this tiny, feisty, brave nation the size of Wales, but the most astonishing is that she has lived to see this birthday at all. The very day after the new state was established, she was invaded by the armies of no fewer than five Arab countries, and she has been struggling for her right to life ever since.
From Morocco to Afghanistan, from the Caspian Sea to Aden, the 5.25 million square miles of territory belonging to members of the Arab League is home to over 330 million people, whereas Israel covers only eight thousand square miles, and is home to seven million citizens, one-fifth of whom are Arabs. The Jews of the Holy Land are thus surrounded by hostile states 650 times their size in territory and sixty times their population, yet their last, best hope of ending two millennia of international persecution – the State of Israel – has somehow survived.
When during the Second World War, the island of Malta came through three terrible years of bombardment and destruction, it was rightly awarded the George Medal for bravery: today Israel should be awarded a similar decoration for defending democracy, tolerance and Western values against a murderous onslaught that has lasted twenty times as long.
Jerusalem is the site of the Temple of Solomon and Herod. The stones of a palace erected by King David himself are even now being unearthed just outside the walls of Jerusalem. Everything that makes a nation state legitimate – blood shed, soil tilled, two millennia of continuous residence, international agreements – argues for Israel’s right to exist, yet that is still denied by the Arab League. For many of their governments, which are rich enough to have solved the Palestinian refugee problem decades ago, it is useful to have Israel as a scapegoat to divert attention from the tyranny, failure and corruption of their own regimes.
The tragic truth is that it suits Arab states very well to have the Palestinians endure permanent refugee status, and whenever Israel puts forward workable solutions they have been stymied by those who interests put the destruction of Israel before the genuine well-being of the Palestinians. Both King Abdullah I of Jordan and Anwar Sadat of Egypt were assassinated when they attempted to come to some kind of sane accommodation with a country that most sane people now accept is not going away.
The process of creating a Jewish homeland in an area where other peoples were already living – though far fewer of them than anti-Israel propagandists claim – was always going to be a complicated and delicate business, and one for which Britain as the Mandated power had a profound responsibility, and about which since the Balfour Declaration of 1917 she had made solemn promises.
Yet instead of keeping a large number of troops on the ground throughout the birth pangs of the State of Israel, Britain hurriedly withdrew all her forces virtually overnight on 14 May 1948, thus facilitating the Arab invasions the very day, one of which was actually commanded by a former British Army officer, John Glubb (known as Glubb Pasha). Less than four years earlier, Britain had landed division after victorious division in Normandy, now ”Partition and flee” was the Attlee government’s ignominious policy, whose consequences are still plaguing the world half a century later in Kashmir and the Middle East.
“We owe to the Jews,” wrote Winston Churchill in 1920, “a system of ethics which, even if it were entirely separated from the supernatural, would be incomparably the most precious possession of mankind, worth in fact the fruits of all wisdom and learning put together.”
The Jewish contribution to finance, science, the arts, academia, commerce and industry, literature, philanthropy and politics has been astonishing relative to their tiny numbers. Although they make up less than half of one per-cent of the world’s population, between 1901 and 1950 Jews won 14% of all the Nobel Prizes awarded for Literature and Science, and between 1951 and 2000 Jews won 32% of the Nobel Prizes for Medicine, 32% for Physics, 39% for Economics and 29% for Science. This, despite so many of their greatest intellects dying in the gas chambers.
Civilization owes Judaism a debt it can never repay, and support for the right of a Jewish homeland to exist is the bare minimum we can provide. Yet we tend to treat Israel like a leper on the international scene, merely for defending herself, and threatening her with academic boycotts if she builds a separation wall that has so far reduced suicide bombings by 95% over three years. It is a disgrace that no senior member of the Royal Family has ever visited Israel, as though the country is still in quarantine after sixty years.
After the Holocaust, the Jewish people recognised that they had to have their own state, a homeland where they could forever be safe from a repetition of such horrors. Putting their trust in Western Civilisation was never again going to be enough. Since then, Israel has had to fight no fewer than five major wars for her very existence. She has been on the front line in the War against Terror and has been fighting the West’s battles for it, decades before 9/11 or 7/7 ever happened. Radical Islam is never going to accept the concept of an Israeli State, so the struggle is likely to continue for another sixty years, but the Jews know that that is less dangerous than entrusting their security to anyone else.
Very often in Britain, especially when faced with the overwhelmingly anti-Israeli bias that is endemic in our liberal media and the BBC, we fail to ask ourselves what we would have done placed in their position? The population of the United Kingdom of 63 million is nine times that of Israel. In July 2006, to take one example at random, Hizbullah crossed the border of Lebanon into Israel and killed eight patrolmen and kidnapped two others, and that summer fired four thousand Katyusha rockets into Israel which killed a further forty-three civilians.
Now, if we multiply those numbers by nine to get the British equivalent, just imagine what WE would do if a terrorist organization based as close as Calais were to fire thirty-six thousand rockets into Sussex and Kent, killing 387 British civilians, after killing seventy-two British servicemen in an ambush and capturing eighteen. There is absolutely no lengths to which our Government would not go to protect British subjects under those circumstances, and quite right too. Why should Israel be expected to behave any differently?
Last month I visited Auschwitz-Birkenau, researching a book about the Second World War. Walking along a line of huts and the railway siding where their forebears had been worked and starved and beaten and gassed to death, were a group of Jewish schoolchildren, one of whom was carrying over his shoulder the Israeli flag, a blue star of David on white background. It was a profoundly moving sight, for it was the sovereign independence represented by that flag which guarantees that the obscenity of genocide – which killed six million people in Auschwitz and camps like it – will never again befall the Jewish people. Happy birthday, Israel and Shalom.
“DESPITE ENTERING ITS SEVENTH DECADE OF LIVING UNDER EXISTENTIAL SIEGE, ISRAEL IS PROSPERING”
Happy 60th birthday, Israel: well done for surviving
By Melanie Phillips
The Spectator
April 30, 2008
Melanie Phillips says that the prosperity and growing cultural confidence of Israel is a fitting riposte to the Western intelligentsia, American meddling and the daily propaganda assault that ignores the Islamisation of the Palestinians
***
What would Israel’s first Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion have said if, on the day that he declared the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, he had known that six decades thence Israel would be encircled by its enemies, hopelessly outnumbered and fighting for its existence? He would surely have said: so what’s new?
Next week, on 8 May, Israel celebrates the 60th anniversary of that declaration. With every decade that it clocks up, people ask the same question: will Israel still be there for the next one? It is indeed astonishing that it has not only survived but is flourishing. Its situation as a permanently embattled nation is unique. On the day after Ben-Gurion declared its independence, six Arab armies invaded and tried to wipe it out. With the current exception of Egypt and Jordan, the Arab and Muslim world has been trying ever since.
Israel is the only country whose creation was approved by the UN; yet it is the only country whose legitimacy is called into question. It is the only country which the world requires to compromise with its Palestinian Arab attackers and accede to their demands, even while they are firing rockets at its schools and houses and blowing up its citizens. It is the only country which continues to provide electricity and basic services to those attackers and routinely treats thousands of Palestinians in its own hospitals, even those who have Israeli blood on their hands. And yet it is the only country which, in the court of public opinion, is condemned for behaving ‘disproportionately’ when it uses targeted military means to defend itself, and is accused of causing the very ‘Nazi’ or ‘apartheid’ atrocities of which it itself is the victim.
At present, the situation looks particularly ominous. Israel is menaced on several fronts by Iran which, racing to develop a nuclear weapon, is threatening a new genocide of the Jews while denying the last one. In Lebanon Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of the Iranian-sponsored army Hezbollah, which is once again armed with thousands of rockets, says the next attack on Israel is not a matter of ‘if’ but ‘when’. Since Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005 Iranian-backed Hamas, which is pledged to wipe out Israel and every Jew, has built a well-trained standing army of at least 20,000 men and a huge arsenal of weapons smuggled in from Egypt, and relentlessly attacks Israel with rockets and bombs.
It is widely expected that, once Independence Day is over and President Bush has returned home from his celebratory visit, Israel will finally mount a major incursion into Gaza to deal with Hamas. If it does, Western opinion, which largely ignores Israeli victimisation, can be guaranteed to cry ‘atrocity’ once again. And just as before, Hamas will deliberately place women and children in the line of fire to maximise civilian casualties in order further to inflame that opinion.
For Israel finds itself trapped by a pincer movement of military and psychological attack from not only the Arab and Muslim world but also the West. And Britain, whose intelligentsia has swallowed wholesale Arab and Muslim lies, is the Western leader of those baying for Israel’s head. Thanks to the poison spread by the British media, the universities, NGOs and the churches, Israel has been systematically demonised and delegitimised.
Few are aware, for example, how both Hamas and Hezbollah deliberately position both terrorists and weaponry in densely populated civilian areas, using women and children as human shields. While British headlines scream at Israel for causing a humanitarian crisis in Gaza, few are aware that Hamas has been stealing fuel supplies intended for Gaza’s population and blowing up the crossing points to provoke Israel into closing them, to escalate the conflict and inflame the world. Even fewer are aware that many of the most inflammatory images from the region are fabricated, since both Hamas and Hezbollah routinely stage ‘atrocities’ or artificially exaggerate incidents using doctored footage – courtesy of British journalists who are threatened with murder or kidnap if they fail to toe the line.
More fundamentally, the obsessional demonisation of Israel is based on a false set of beliefs taken straight from Arab propaganda – that as a result of Holocaust guilt, Israel was created when a load of European Jews with no claim to the land were dumped on Palestine, driving out its rightful Arab Muslim inhabitants.
Ben-Gurion would today be surprised to find, for example, that Israel is regarded as illegally occupying the West Bank (and until 2005, Gaza). Along with modern Israel, this was part of the territory of Palestine within which in 1922 the League of Nations gave Britain the task of re-establishing the Jewish national home because of the unique claim by the Jews – the only people for whom it had ever been their nation state, hundreds of years before the Arabs invaded it. In other words, far from being ‘Palestinian land’, the Jews are entitled to claim it under international law, which also gives it the right to hold on to it in self-defence. Yet ‘progressive’ opinion not only denies