Tom Gross Mideast Media Analysis

Waiting for Godot: Abbas, the Palestinian Yitzhak Shamir (& Israel’s sustainable success)

April 25, 2014

Abbas and Obama, meeting again at the White House last month

 

* Ari Shavit (Ha’aretz): “In early 1997, rumors were rife about the Beilin-Abu Mazen [Abbas’ nom de guerre] agreement, but only a few had the opportunity to see the document with their own eyes or hold it in their hands. I was one of those few. With mouth agape I read the comprehensive outline for peace formulated by two brilliant champions of peace -- one, Israeli, and one, Palestinian. The document left nothing to chance: Mahmoud Abbas is ready to sign a permanent agreement… If we could only get out from under the Likud’s thumb, and get Netanyahu out of office, he will join us, hand in hand, walking toward the two-state solution…

“We understood. We did what was necessary. In 1999, we ousted Likud and Netanyahu. In 2000, we went to the peace summit at Camp David. Whoops, surprise: Abbas didn’t bring the Beilin-Abu Mazen plan to Camp David, or any other draft of a peace proposal. The opposite was true: He was one of the staunchest objectors… But don’t believe we’d give up so quickly. During the fall of 2003 we… in 2008 we … in 2009, we … [And all the time Abbas said no, no, no.] And Abbas has said no in recent months to both Kerry and Obama...

“Take heed: Twenty years of fruitless talks have led to nothing. There is no document that contains any real Palestinian concession with Abbas’ signature. None. There never was, and there never will be… Time passes and the experiences we’ve accumulated have taught both Beilin and me more than a few things. But many others [on the Israeli and international left] haven’t learned a thing. They’re still allowing Abbas to make fools of them, as they wait for the Palestinian Godot, who will never show up.”

***

* Khaled Abu Toameh (Jerusalem Post): “Abbas knows that Hamas has not and will not change. Even after the agreement was announced in the Gaza Strip, Hamas leaders continued to voice their opposition to the peace talks with Israel and the two state solution. Abbas also knows that there is nothing ‘historic’ about this agreement, the fourth of its kind since 2007. Palestinians have witnessed many handshakes and kisses between Hamas and Fatah leaders in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Qatar, Egypt and now the Gaza Strip...”

* “It’s one thing to achieve reconciliation and agreements to implement previous deals. But it’s a completely different thing to achieve real unity and end the division between Fatah and Hamas. Hamas is unlikely to cede control over the Gaza Strip to Abbas. Fatah, for its part, is not going to allow Hamas to establish bases of power in the West Bank.”

***

* Roger Cohen (New York Times): “Tel Aviv, one of the world’s most attractive cities, has a boom-time purr about it. For all the talk of its isolation – and all the efforts of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (B.D.S.) movement – Israel has an economy as creative as it is successful. Yes, behind its barriers and wall, the status quo is sustainable.

* Throughout this year the Obama administration has pushed the unsustainability argument to make its case for peace. “Today’s status quo, absolutely to a certainty, I promise you 100 percent, cannot be maintained,” Secretary of State John Kerry said in February. “It is not sustainable. It is illusionary. There’s a momentary prosperity, there’s a momentary peace. More recently, President Obama said of Israel: “There comes a point where you can’t manage this anymore.”

* Cohen: “But that ‘point’ of unmanageability is a vanishing one. Backed by the evidence, Netanyahu’s coalition are certain it can be managed. They are right. [Although] Of course, manageability does not equal desirability.”

***

* Asaf Romirowsky (Ynet): “Palestinian rejectionism of the simple concept of the Jewish state makes a farce of the evenhandedness Washington has thus far pursued. It also shows how ill-informed Washington is about Palestinian national identity, predicated on winning a zero sum struggle with Zionism, not a vision of a state of their own. It would behoove Washington to do a serious reality check of their friends and enemies before they begin to engage in another peace non-starter.”

***

* Both Republicans and Democrats warn the Palestinian Authority that they won’t get anymore American tax-payers’ money.

***

You can comment on this dispatch here: www.facebook.com/TomGrossMedia. Please also press “Like” on that page.

 

CONTENTS

1. “Abbas’s terrible decision for his own people”
2. Extra note: The BBC and Netanyahu
3. “Waiting for the Palestinian Godot” (By Ari Shavit, Ha’aretz, April 24, 2014)
4. Tweets sent by Israeli far-left activist Gershon Baskin (April 24, 2014)
5. “Israel’s sustainable success” (By Roger Cohen, New York Times, April 25, 2014)
6. “ Abbas’s message – My demands, or else” (By Khaled Abu Toameh, Jerusalem Post, April 24, 2014)
7. “Hamas deal last straw for Congress on aid to Palestinians” (By Julian Pecquet, Al-Monitor, April 23, 2014)
8. “The evenhandedness trap” (By Asaf Romirowsky, Ynet, April 25, 2014)


“ABBAS’S TERRIBLE DECISION FOR HIS OWN PEOPLE”

[Note by Tom Gross]

Six days before the scheduled end of the current round of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, having said no to every peace proposal put forward by President Barack Obama and John Kerry over the past nine months, Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas instead made a pact with the Palestinian terror group Hamas.

Hamas is responsible, since the Oslo peace accords, for murdering and injuring countless Israeli civilians in hundreds of terror attacks.

Its covenant calls for Muslims to wage Jihad not just against Israelis, but to kill Jews in general.

It has fired, or allowed to be fired from its territory, over 10,000 missiles and rockets aimed at Israeli civilians.

(Both the BBC and New York Times -- today’s international edition, front page story by Jodi Rudoren -- make it seem that only the governments of Israel and America believe that Hamas is a terrorist group. What they don’t tell their audience is that dozens of European countries, not to mention Canada, Japan, Egypt, Australia, New Zealand and others, categorize Hamas as a terrorist organization.)

As Israel’s chief negotiator, the moderate politician Tzipi Livni, said yesterday: “The agreement that Mahmoud Abbas signed with Hamas is a bad step. Hamas combines religious Muslim extremist ideology with terrorism and doesn’t recognize our right to exist.”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told MSNBC in an interview yesterday that by embracing Hamas “President Abbas had made a terrible decision for peace and, by the way, a terrible decision, I think, for his own people.”

U.S. State Department Spokesperson Jen Psaki said in response to Abbas’s move: “Any Palestinian government must unambiguously and explicitly commit to nonviolence, recognition of the state of Israel, and acceptance of previous agreements and obligations between the parties. Hamas would need to abide by these principles in order to be a part of the government.”

A senior Hamas official, Hassan Yousef, has already said that the newly announced Palestinian unity government “will not recognize ‘Israel’ and will not give up the resistance” (i.e. terror attacks).

In response to Abbas’s move, Israel’s security cabinet yesterday decided to suspend the talks with the Palestinian Authority.

In fact, the differences between Hamas and Fatah (Abbas’s party) are not so great. Both engage in vicious incitement to murder Jews and have carried out many such attacks. For example, when the Palestinian Minister of Religious Affairs, Mahmoud al-Habbash, denounced the Passover murder last week of an Israeli man on the way to his family Seder meal (and the injuring of his wife and nine-year-old child), Fatah condemned and threatened al-Habbash. (Incidentally, the injured wife of the murdered Israeli is a British citizen, yet I have not read or heard one peep of concern in the British media about the attack – as was the case here too: www.tomgrossmedia.com/TheForgottenRachels.html.

Just this week, the Palestinian news agency Ma’an reported that Fatah’s “military” wing, the Al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades, announced they “will adhere to the option of armed resistance until the liberation of all of Palestine”. This is a euphemism regularly employed by Fatah to refer to the destruction of Israel.

Earlier this year, Fatah posted a video promising to “turn Tel Aviv into a ball of fire.”

***

I attach a number of articles below.

Among the articles is one by the center-left writer for Ha’aretz Ari Shavit, appealing to his fellow leftists -- which as he pointed out in other articles in Ha’aretz last month include his fellow columnists and the publisher of Ha’aretz, to “wake up” and stop being so naive about Palestinian intentions. (Last month the publisher of Ha’aretz penned an op-ed in his own paper lambasting Shavit for criticizing his colleagues, whom Shavit compared to the inward-looking anti-Zionist – and often anti-Semitic – ultra-orthodox Jewish cult Neturei Karta, infamous for attending Jobbik rallies in Hungary and Holocaust denial conferences in Iran.)

I also attach a piece by the New York Times columnist and the paper’s former foreign editor, Roger Cohen, who having strongly attacked the Israeli center and right on many occasions in the past, in his article today, is surprisingly understanding of their position and predicament.

(Cohen, who is a subscriber to this list, also picks up in his article on the rapidly growing economic ties between Israel and China, which I discussed in dispatches last month.)

-- Tom Gross

 

EXTRA NOTE: THE BBC AND NETANYAHU

In his BBC interview with Jeremy Bowen yesterday, Benjamin Netanyahu said the following during the interview, but it was edited out by the BBC and they did not use it in any of the packages they broadcast with the story, which they have been running all last evening and through the night.

Here is the quote by Netanyahu to the BBC that the BBC decided its audiences on its news broadcasts yesterday evening should not hear:

“Test facts. What did I do for peace? I gave a speech to my constituency and I told them we're going to have to have two states for two peoples. That's a first for a Likud Prime Minister. Then I did something that no Prime Minister in Israel ever did. I was the first Prime Minister to freeze construction in the settlements. And then I did something else, which I think is the most agonizing decision of my three tenures, and that was to release these terrorists who murdered Israelis, all for the sake of engaging peace. And I ask you, what did President Abbas do? What has he done? He's done one thing: he embraced the terrorists who are out to destroy the state of Israel.”


ARTICLES

JUST SAY NO

Waiting for the Palestinian Godot
Why are we repeatedly surprised every time Mahmoud Abbas fails to sign a peace agreement with Israel?
By Ari Shavit
Ha’aretz
April 24, 2014

www.haaretz.com/opinion/1.586945

There are some moments a journalist will never forget. In early 1997, Yossi Beilin decided to trust me, and show me the document that proved that peace was within reach. The then-prominent and creative politician from the Labor movement opened up a safe, took out a stack of printed pages, and laid them down on the table like a player with a winning poker hand.

Rumors were rife about the Beilin-Abu Mazen agreement, but only a few had the opportunity to see the document with their own eyes or hold it in their hands. I was one of those few. With mouth agape I read the comprehensive outline for peace that had been formulated 18 months earlier by two brilliant champions of peace -- one, Israeli, and one, Palestinian. The document left nothing to chance: Mahmoud Abbas is ready to sign a permanent agreement. The refugee from Safed had overcome the ghosts of the past and the ideas of the past, and was willing to build a joint Israeli-Palestinian future, based on coexistence. If we could only get out from under the Likud’s thumb, and get Benjamin Netanyahu out of office, he will join us, hand in hand, walking toward the two-state solution. Abbas is a serious partner for true peace, the one with whom we can make a historic breakthrough toward reconciliation.

We understood. We did what was necessary. In 1999, we ousted Likud and Netanyahu. In 2000, we went to the peace summit at Camp David. Whoops, surprise: Abbas didn’t bring the Beilin-Abu Mazen plan to Camp David, or any other draft of a peace proposal. The opposite was true: He was one of the staunchest objectors, and his demand for the right of return prevented any progress.

But don’t believe we’d give up so quickly. During the fall of 2003, as the Geneva Accord was being formulated, it was clear to us that there were no more excuses, and that now, Abbas would sign the new peace agreement and adopt its principles. Whoops, surprise: Abu Mazen sent Yasser Abed Rabbo (a former Palestinian Authority minister) instead, while he stayed in his comfy Ramallah office. No signature, no accord.

But people as steadfast as us don’t give up on our dreams. So in 2008 we got behind Ehud Olmert, and the marathon talks he held with Abbas, and the offer that couldn’t be refused. Whoops, surprise: Abu Mazen didn’t actually refuse, he just disappeared. He didn’t say yes, he didn’t say no, he just vanished without a trace.

Did we start to understand that we were facing the Palestinian Yitzhak Shamir? No, no, no. In the summer of 2009, we even supported Netanyahu, when he made overtures to Abbas with his Bar-Ilan speech, and the settlement freeze. Whoops, surprise: the sophisticated objector didn’t blink, or trip up. He simple refused to dance the tango of peace with the right-wing Israeli leader.

Have we opened our eyes? Of course not. Again, we blamed Netanyahu and Likud, and believed that in 2014, Abu Mazen wouldn’t dare to say no, not to John Kerry. Whoops, surprise: In his own sophisticated, polite way, Abbas has said no in recent months to both Kerry and Barack Obama. Again, the Palestinian president’s position is clear and consistent: The Palestinians must not be required to make concessions. It’s a complicated game – squeezing more and more compromises out of the Israelis, without the Palestinians granting a single real, compromise of their own.

Take heed: Twenty years of fruitless talks have led to nothing. There is no document that contains any real Palestinian concession with Abbas’ signature. None. There never was, and there never will be.

During the 17 years that have gone by since Beilin took that document out of his safe, he’s gotten divorced, remarried, and had grandchildren. I also divorced, remarried, and brought (more) children into the world. Time passes and the experiences we’ve accumulated have taught both Beilin and me more than a few things. But many others haven’t learned a thing. They’re still allowing Abbas to make fools of them, as they wait for the Palestinian Godot, who will never show up.

 

SOME QUESTIONS AND REMARKS

The following are tweets sent yesterday by Israeli far-left activist Gershon Baskin (from his twitter feed)

April 24, 2014

This is of course not the first time that Hamas & the PLO have agreed on reconciliation.

Implementation is much more difficult than signing Palestinian unity under which flag? Palestine or Hamas? Who’s ideology is it that they unify under?

Will Hamas Ezzedin al Qassam troops merge into the PA security forces or the opposite? Will PA troops take over Rafah crossing?

Will PA security forces continue security coordination with Israel as part of a joint government?

Will the 70,000 PA (Ramallah) employees in Gaza be allowed to go back to work in the Hamas controlled offices, including teachers?

Hamas changed some Gaza school books, which text books will be used? In Gaza Hamas was teaching Hebrew, will they now in the West Bank schools?

Will Gaza return to VAT clearances with Israel? Will Hamas give up its control of the Gaza side of the Erez crossing?

Will beer be allowed back in Gaza? Will women in Gaza be allowed to dress as they like or will the Hamas police still harass women in Gaza?

If there are new Palestinian elections, which is badly needed, will the winner take all? Will both sides respect the outcome of elections?

Will Hamas allow PA newspapers into Gaza?

Will the PA allow Hamas Imams to function in the West Bank?

Will the PA release Hamas prisoners in the West Bank, will Hamas release Fatah prisoners in Gaza?

Will Mohammed Dahlan make and entry? Will he be welcome in the West Bank or in Gaza?

Will the EU and the US continue to provide financial support to Palestine?

Will all of the 133 countries which have recognized the State of Palestine recognize it with a joint government with Hamas?

If there is a joint PLO-Hamas government and Hamas abducts another Israeli soldier will the PA stand behind it or reject it?

If there is a joint PLO-Hamas government and rockets continue to be shot at Israel from Gaza, who will be held responsible?

The Ramallah PA uses about 60% of its budget on Gaza, will it now be allowed to collect taxes in Gaza?

The Ramallah PA pays the electricity and water bills for Gaza, will it now be able to charge for electricity and collect money for water?

Will the hamas Minister of interior who runs a private army be subordinate to the new joint government?

If the unity government will be made of technocrats, what will Ismail Haniyeh be doing in his retirement?

With a new unity government, will Egypt re-open the Rafah border? Will Egypt forget that Hamas-the MB - is still part of the government?

If there is a new unity government and hamas continues to dig tunnels into Israel or Israel, what will the government do?

Hamas clergy regularly preach against Jews and Christians, what sayeth you Palestinian Christians about the unity?

Hamas has said that it will never recognize Israel, does the PLO withdraw its recognition of Israel granted by President Arafat?

Will Abbas demand that to participate in elections Hamas must renounces its covenant of hate?

Hamas implements the death penalty against collaborators. Until now they considered Abbas a collaborator. Will he get the death penalty?

To Netanyahu: the best way to block the Hamas-PLO deal is to make the Palestinians an offer they can’t refuse-end the occupation

If Kerry’s negotiations were real the Palestinian unity deal would not be happening

Kerry’s 9 months gave birth to Palestinian unity, not the end of the occupation
In 9 months of “negotiations” Israel never put an offer on the table. Where is the Israeli proposal?

Where is Netanyahu’s map? doesn’t exist

Hamas is financially bankrupt, will PLO now pay its salaries or fire them?

Yesterday I thought that Kerry’s 9 months were a false pregnancy, but now there is a baby popping out, but not the one expected

Now that there is unity isn’t it time for the Hamas leadership to come back to Palestine? Khaled Mashal pack your bags, Gaza is waiting

The Palestinian Declaration of Independence written by M.Darwish recognizes UN Res181 for Jewish & Arab states in Palestine, what sayeth Hamas?

Hamas Covenant: The Islamic Resistance Movement is one of the wings of Moslem Brotherhood in Palestine

Hamas Covenant: The Day of Judgment will not come about until Moslems fight the Jews (killing the Jews)

Initiatives, & so-called peaceful solutions and international conferences, are in contradiction to the principles of Hamas

Hamas: In face of the Jews’ usurpation of Palestine, it is compulsory that the banner of Jihad be raised.

Hamas: The day The PLO adopts Islam as its way of life, we will become its soldiers, and fuel for its fire that will burn the enemies.

 

“IT IS SUSTAINABLE, THOUGH NOT DESIRABLE”

Israel’s Sustainable Success
By Roger Cohen
New York Times
April 25, 2014

LONDON – Hearing an Indian official talk the other day about Delhi’s booming arms trade and ever-closer relationship with Israel, I had a thought that also struck me while listening to Israeli businessmen in Beijing. The idea may be summed up in three words: It is sustainable.

“Pivot to Asia” is a term that might be applied to Israel. Its trade with China has boomed, reaching more than $8 billion in 2013 from a pittance when diplomatic relations were established in 1992 (the same year as with India). Europe huffs and puffs about the West Bank settlements; Asia does business. India has already bought sea-to-sea missiles, radar for a missile-intercept system and communications equipment from Israel.

Tel Aviv, one of the world’s most attractive cities, has a boom-time purr about it. For all the talk of its isolation – and all the efforts of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (B.D.S.) movement – Israel has an economy as creative as it is successful. Yes, it is sustainable.

Behind its barriers and wall, backed by military might, certain of more or less unswerving American support, technologically innovative and democratically stable, Israel has the power to prolong indefinitely its occupation of the West Bank and its dominion over several million Palestinians. The Jewish state has grown steadily stronger in relation to the Palestinians since 1948. There is no reason to believe this trend will ever be reversed. Holding onto all the land between the Mediterranean and the Jordan River, while continuing to prosper, is feasible. This, after all, is what Israel has already done for almost a half-century.

It is time to retire the unsustainability nostrum. Facile and inaccurate, it distracts from the inconvenient truth of Israel’s sustainable success.

Throughout this year the Obama administration has pushed the unsustainability argument to make its case for peace. “Today’s status quo, absolutely to a certainty, I promise you 100 percent, cannot be maintained,” Secretary of State John Kerry said in February. “It is not sustainable. It is illusionary. There’s a momentary prosperity, there’s a momentary peace.”

More recently, President Obama told Jeffrey Goldberg of Bloomberg View that his question to Benjamin Netanyahu was: “If not now, when? And if not you, Mr. Prime Minister, then who?”

Obama also said of Israel: “There comes a point where you can’t manage this anymore, and then you start having to make very difficult choices. Do you resign yourself to what amounts to a permanent occupation of the West Bank?”

But that “point” of unmanageability is a vanishing one. Permanent occupation is what several ministers in Netanyahu’s coalition government advocate. Backed by the evidence, they are certain it can be managed. They are right.

Of course, manageability does not equal desirability. There is no consent of the governed in the West Bank. Dominion over another people is morally corrosive; Jews, of all people, know that. The nationalist-religious credo that the West Bank was land promised to Abraham’s descendants has intensified over the past half-century. Settlers see their work as the culmination of the Zionist idea of settlement. The opposite is true. Israel has undermined its Zionist founders’ commitment to a democratic state governed by laws.

The occupation undercuts Israel’s own Founding Charter of 1948, which promised a state based on “complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants irrespective of religion, race or sex.”

These, too, are uncomfortable facts. But the evidence is that Israelis, in their majority, prefer to live with them than believe in a sustainable peace with Palestinians. Trust your neighbor? Been there, tried that. Which brings us to the agreement (yet another) reached this week between Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority, and Hamas, the militant Islamist group, to form a unity government and hold elections within six months.

Netanyahu leapt on it to inter the already half-buried peace talks: “Does he want peace with Hamas, or peace with Israel? You can have one but not the other.” But Israelis are smarter than that. They know that any peace with only one Palestinian faction would not amount to peace at all; that without elections, eight years after the last vote, Abbas has no real legitimacy; and that bringing a weakened Hamas under Egyptian suasion into a unity government (if that happens) would increase pressure on Hamas to meet international demands that it recognize Israel’s right to exist, renounce violence and accept previous signed agreements.

Moving toward a two-state peace – the best outcome for both nations – cannot be based either on the myth that Israel’s current situation is unsustainable or on the myth that the Palestinian Authority, as currently constituted, represents the Palestinian national movement. It can only emerge when a majority on both sides believes, based on the facts, that painful compromise in the name of a better future is preferable to manageable conflict fed by the wounds of the past.

 

MY DEMANDS, OR ELSE

Analysis: Abbas’s message – My demands, or else…
By Khaled Abu Toameh
Jerusalem Post
April 24, 2014

One week before the expiration of the April 29 deadline for peace talks with Israel, PA president has clearly decided to try every available maneuver to exert pressure on Israel, US.

Wednesday’s “historic” agreement between Hamas and Fatah should be seen in the context of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’s efforts to send a message to Israel and the US concerning the crisis in the peace talks.

Abbas’s message: Look what I’m capable of doing if you don’t comply with my demands.

Israel cancels planned peace talks meeting after Fatah-Hamas unity deal announced
The timing of the Fatah-Hamas accord is not coincidental. One week before the expiration of the April 29 deadline for the peace talks with Israel, Abbas has clearly decided to try every available maneuver to exert pressure on Israel and the US.

His first move came two weeks ago in the form of a televised ceremony in which he signed applications to join 15 international treaties.

Then came threats to resign, dismantle the PA and “hand the keys back to Israel.”

He later moved on to a tactic aimed at influencing Israeli public opinion. In the past week, he has met with MKs and journalists in a bid to win the sympathy of the Israeli public.

Realizing that his moves have had almost no impact on decision-makers in Israel and the US, Abbas finally resorted to the issue of reconciliation and unity with Hamas.

After years of hostility, he has suddenly discovered that Hamas can be a “real national partner” for his Fatah faction.

Yet Abbas knows that Hamas has not and will not change. Even after the agreement was announced in the Gaza Strip, Hamas leaders continued to voice their opposition to the peace talks with Israel and the twostate solution.

Abbas also knows that there is nothing “historic” about this agreement, the fourth of its kind since 2007. In fact, the latest accord is just another agreement to implement previous agreements and understandings between Hamas and Fatah.

Since 2007, Palestinians have witnessed many handshakes and kisses between Hamas and Fatah leaders in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Qatar, Egypt and now the Gaza Strip.

In the past three years, similar agreements to implement previous “historic” accords were announced by Fatah and Hamas, but never materialized.

It’s one thing to achieve reconciliation and agreements to implement previous deals. But it’s a completely different thing to achieve real unity and end the division between Fatah and Hamas.

Hamas is unlikely to cede control over the Gaza Strip to Abbas. Fatah, for its part, is not going to allow Hamas to establish bases of power in the West Bank.

Abbas has only one thing in mind: how to extract concessions from Israel and the US. If the new maneuver with Hamas does not work, he will have to think of something else he can pull from his sleeve.

 

NO MORE AMERICAN TAX-PAYERS MONEY?

Hamas deal last straw for Congress on US aid to Palestinians
By Julian Pecquet
Al-Monitor
April 23, 2014

www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2014/04/suspend-aid-reconciliation-hamas-fatah-congress.html

Wednesday’s announcement of a reconciliation between the rival Palestinian factions Hamas and Fatah triggered an instant call for retaliation on Capitol Hill.

Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla., the author of the Palestinian Anti-Terrorism Act, called for an immediate suspension of US aid to the Palestinian Authority (PA). The 2006 law, passed after Hamas won that year’s legislative elections, prohibits support for a “Hamas-controlled Palestinian Authority.”

“The Administration must halt aid to the Palestinian Authority and condition any future assistance as leverage to force Abu Mazen [Mahmoud Abbas] to abandon this reconciliation with Hamas and to implement real reforms within the PA,” Ros-Lehtinen, who chairs the House Foreign Affairs panel on the Middle East, said in a statement. “U.S. law is clear on the prohibition of U.S. assistance to a unity Palestinian government that includes Hamas, a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization, and President [Barack] Obama must not allow one cent of American taxpayer money to help fund this terrorist group.”

Her Democratic counterpart on the subcommittee, Ted Deutch of Florida, issued a similar warning.

“President Abbas now stands at a pivotal crossroad – does he want peace with Israel or reconciliation with Hamas?” Deutch said. “Be certain that the Palestinian Authority will face significant consequences if a unity government is formed that includes terrorist members of Hamas.”

Rep. Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, flatly said the move “jeopardizes US assistance.”

The statements follow reports out of Gaza that Hamas and the PLO, which runs the PA in the West Bank, have agreed to form a unity government within five weeks. Such a government would then prepare for elections within the next six months.

“I announce to our people the news that the years of split are over,” Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh was quoted as telling reporters in Gaza.

The announcement comes on the heels of the Abbas’ decision to sign 15 UN treaties, a move that had already triggered congressional ire. House appropriators warned earlier this month that they could revisit aid requests as a result of that decision, which the Palestinians said was in response to Israel’s failure to release a fourth and final batch of prisoners under the terms of US-brokered peace talks.

The White House requested $440 million for aid to the West Bank and Gaza in 2014.

The president’s fiscal year 2015 budget request includes $370 million in Economic Support Funds that the State Department says “creates an atmosphere that supports negotiations, encourages broad-based economic growth, promotes democratic governance, and improves the everyday lives of Palestinians, thereby creating an environment supportive of a peace agreement and contributing to the overall stability and security of the region.” It also sets aside $70 million in International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement funding aimed at “reforming the Palestinian Authority (PA) security sector, and sustaining and maintaining the capabilities that the security forces have developed.”

State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said joining forces with Hamas could put aid to the PA in jeopardy.

“Well, obviously, there would be implications,” she told reporters on April 23. “I don’t have those all in front of me … but what we’re going to watch and see here is what happens over the coming hours and days to see what steps are taken by the Palestinians.”

The Palestinian envoy to the United States had no immediate comment.

The 2006 anti-terror law bars aid to a Hamas government unless the group recognizes Israel, dismantles terrorist infrastructure in its jurisdiction and ceases anti-Israel “incitement.” Early reports suggested that’s unlikely to happen, with the Palestinian Information Center quoting Hamas parliamentarian Hassan Youssef as declaring that Hamas would neither recognize Israel nor “give up the resistance.”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Abbas would have to choose between Hamas and peace talks with Israel.

“Does he want peace with Hamas, or peace with Israel?” Netanyahu said. “You can have one but not the other. I hope he chooses peace. So far, he hasn’t done so.”

“A unity government with Hamas, within the frame of reference of where Hamas’ position is, turns that government effectively into a terrorist government,” Hillel Frisch, a senior research fellow at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies at Bar-Ilan University, said in a conference call with reporters organized by The Israel Project. “Because it’s a government where a principal member of that government – maybe even the leading member of that government – advocates terrorism against a sovereign United Nations member state. In that sense it would certainly be considered a terrorist entity and might legally be sanctioned with congressional cuts.”

Ironically, Frisch suggested Israel would welcome a unity government – if Hamas turned over a new leaf.

“In fact,” he said, a unity government “would be much better, because any peace talks could possibly result in a peace agreement with all the Palestinians, rather than half the Palestinians.”

“Until now,” he said, “any process that ends up with a peace agreement with Abbas, we know with 100% certainty that come the next day Israel will be attacked with rockets from Gaza.”

Ros-Lehtinen said she’d hold hearings on the PA soon.

“In the coming weeks, I will convene a subcommittee hearing on this issue and many more regarding the PA, Israel and the peace process,” she said. “It’s long past time the US reassess its relationship with the corrupt Abu Mazen and his cronies.”

Her panel is scheduled to hold a hearing next week on Obama’s fiscal year 2015 budget request for the Middle East and North Africa. Slated to testify are Anne Patterson, assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern Affairs, and Alina Romanowski, deputy assistant US Agency for International Development administrator.

 

THE EVENHANDEDNESS TRAP

The evenhandedness trap
By Asaf Romirowsky
Ynet
April 25, 2014

It is clear that by the end of the month the Obama-Kerry peace initiative will be declared a failure. While the efforts may have been sincere, the lack of historical understanding and reading of the signs doomed these efforts from the beginning.

Historically, what is prevalent among American foreign policy makers is the view that both parties in the negotiations, Israelis and Palestinians, are equal; ergo, they are equally responsible and equally to blame. In itself this is a flawed reading of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Instead, one must start with the fact that the majority of the Arab-Muslim world has always seen the Jewish state as an abomination.

Famous educator and philosopher John Dewey viewed social hope as an essential component of American democracy, where theology and law are secondary to the free will of people engaged in pragmatic politics. Over the years, many peace brokers have fallen into the trap of wishing to export this form of hope into the Arab mindset that, if adopted, would endear them to American values of Americana. An honest reading of history disproves any of these attempts.

A perfect case study is the 2000 Mitchell Report, the product of a committee headed by former US Senator George Mitchell, who was given the mandate to oversee Palestinian-Israeli negotiations. Three years earlier, Mitchell had succeeded in reaching a peace agreement in Northern Ireland, and he sought to duplicate that same success in the Middle East. Moreover, he identified substantial similarities between the two conflicts.

As Mitchell writes, “I’ve often been asked what lessons Northern Ireland holds for other conflicts, especially the Middle East. I’ll try to answer that question now. I begin with caution. Each human being is unique. Each human society is unique. It follows logically, then, that no two conflicts are the same. Much as we would like it, there is no magic formula which, once discovered, can be used to end all conflicts. But there are certain principles that I believe are universal in their reach. They arise out of my beliefs, and they were validated for me by my experience in Northern Ireland. I call them the Principles of Peace. First, I believe there’s no such thing as a conflict that can’t be ended. They’re created and sustained by human beings. They can be ended by human beings. No matter how ancient the conflict, no matter how hateful, no matter how hurtful, peace can prevail.”

Mitchell’s conclusions mirror the Dewy mindset but go further to demand a peace which, despite his talk of uniqueness, lacks any understanding of the actual Middle Eastern environment.

IMPORTANT CONTRASTS

Reaching a peace agreement freely, as a pragmatic repudiation of local culture and history, is an integral part of American democracy and negotiating style. Mitchell worked from the premise that freely reached agreements would facilitate compromise between warring parties, just as they do in America. His challenge, however, was to convince all the parties that the democratic ideals he proposed were above the details of the conflict would facilitate success. This did not occur.

Mitchell’s legacy to the Obama-Kerry team has been the foundation for discussing peace between Israelis and Palestinians based on Confidence Building Measures (CBM). Like many others, he believed the basis for creating peace required building trust, both in Ireland and Israel, and he omitted addressing responsibility or fault. Thus, one of Northern Ireland’s greatest successes lay not in the peace agreement, but in overcoming the rivalry between Catholic and Protestant victimization complexes. Unfortunately, a sense of victimhood is the core of Palestinian identity; Israel’s creation is the original sin.

There are important contrasts between Mitchell and Kerry-Obama, principally the belief that the only trust they need to gain is from the Palestinians. Unlike Mitchell, Obama and Kerry have made it quite clear that Israel is the “real” obstacle to peace. But US support for Palestinian statehood, despite the Palestinians’ obvious and overwhelming endorsement of terrorism, has brought US policy towards the Palestinians into contradiction with other policies towards radical Islam. Going forward after this latest failure of negotiations is to tie its Palestinian policy, and its policy on the Arab-Israeli conflict, with wider US goals of regional stability and development.

Palestinian rejectionism of the simple concept of the Jewish state makes a farce of the evenhandedness Washington has thus far pursued. It also shows how ill-informed Washington is about Palestinian national identity, predicated on winning a zero sum struggle with Zionism, not a vision of a state of their own. With such a radical lack of empathy there can be little social hope.

Finally, it would behoove Washington to do a serious reality check of their friends and enemies before they begin to engage in another peace non-starter.


Palestinian Authority spokesman accuses al-Qaeda leader of being a “Zionist” (& other items)

April 20, 2014

Chelsea Clinton at her wedding

 

* Missouri Mayor says he “kind of agrees” with Kansas killer about Jews

* Stabbing poor cows in the eye in Gaza

* The meaning (or not) of Hillary’s Jewish grandchild

***

This dispatch contains a variety of items.You can comment on it here: www.facebook.com/TomGrossMedia. Please also press “Like” on that page.

 

CONTENTS

1. Media silent as another Ukrainian synagogue is firebombed
2. Kansans form an “angel wall” to protect funerals of murder victims
3. Missouri Mayor says he “kind of agrees” with Kansas killer about Jews
4. Palestinian Authority spokesman accuses al-Qaeda leader of being a “Zionist”
5. Media speculates on the “meaning” of Hillary Clinton’s “Jewish” grandchild
6. Italian police raid homes of prominent anti-Semites
7. Dutch student exposes post-war Amsterdam Holocaust scandal
8. Stabbing poor cows in the eye in Gaza
9. Thousands hold Jerusalem rally calling for the legalization of marijuana
10. “Echoes from a lost world”


[Notes below by Tom Gross]

MEDIA SILENT AS ANOTHER UKRAINIAN SYNAGOGUE IS FIREBOMBED

Western media and politicians have made a great deal of fuss in recent days about leaflets threatening Ukrainian Jews. These are, it now turns out, probably the work of Ukrainian nationalists trying to discredit separatists in the majority Russian-speaking east of the country.

But, as I have noted before, Western media and politicians continue to all but ignore a series of actual attacks on Jewish persons and buildings elsewhere in Ukraine, likely to be the work of far-right Ukrainian nationalists, some of them represented in the new Western-backed government in Kiev. (Russian President Putin may be a thug but this shouldn’t serve as an excuse for Western media to fail to report properly that Putin is right when he points out that Ukraine is the only country in Europe with a Fascist party, Svoboda, taking part in government, and that Western governments last month agreed to provide that government with an enormous $27 billion in aid. Such aid should, in my opinion, have been conditional on Ukraine’s government not awarding ministerial positions to Svoboda – Svoboda holds five senior government posts.)

The latest attack on Jews in Ukraine came yesterday (at 2 am on Saturday morning, during the week-long Passover holiday) as several firebombs were thrown at the synagogue in the southern city of Nikolayev.

The attack was caught on the synagogue’s CCTV video system, and posted online by Yisroel Gotlieb, the son of the city’s Chief Rabbi, Sholom Gotlieb.

You can watch a four-minute video of it here:


In February, the Giymat Rosa Synagogue in Zaporizhia, southeast of Kiev was firebombed. A number of Jews have been stabbed in recent weeks in Kiev and elsewhere.

 

KANSANS FORM AN “ANGEL WALL” TO PROTECT FUNERALS OF MURDER VICTIMS

[This is a follow-up to the first item in last Monday’s dispatch: Three dead in pre-Passover shootings at Jewish buildings in Kansas City.]

After the Westboro Baptist Church, an extremist anti-Semitic religious hate group, said it would picket the funerals of the victims of last Sunday’s murders at two Jewish institutions in Kansas, over 2,000 people turned out to protect mourners at the funerals from the Westboro protesters.

Some of the counter-protestors wore Jewish phylacteries and prayer shawls in solidarity with Kansas’s Jewish community.

In a statement before the funerals, the Westboro Baptist Church said “God sent the shooter to punish the Jew-lovers for their vile sins.”

The church said that such funerals have become “pagan orgies where they worship these corpses instead of the Lord their God.” It called those who were murdered “faux-Christians” who are part of a “filthy community”.

(The church is also infamous for picketing the funerals of American servicemen killed in Afghanistan and Iraq, and for its extreme anti-homosexual statements.)

The 2,000 Kansan counter-protestors – organized through a Facebook page – formed an 80-block-long wall surrounding the funerals of Dr. William Corporon and his 14-year-old grandson Reat Underwood, two of the three victims of last Sunday’s shootings, to protect mourners from would-be disrupters.

The murderer, Frazier Glenn Cross, is a self-confessed “grand dragon” of the Carolina Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, and an admirer of anti-Zionist websites, in which he sometimes praised articles defaming Israel by extreme anti-Zionist Jews.

 

[I sent this item to some people a few days ago.]

MISSOURI MAYOR SAYS HE “KIND OF AGREES” WITH KANSAS KILLER ABOUT JEWS

The mayor of Marionville, Missouri, near where Frazier Glenn Miller used to live, said this week that he agreed with Miller’s views.

“He was always nice and friendly and respectful of elder people, you know, he respected his elders greatly,” Mayor Dan Clevenger told the local ABC TV affiliate KSPR. He added, laughing, “as long as they were the same color as him. [He was] very fair and honest.”

Mayor Clevenger then went on to say that he “kind of agreed with [Miller] on some things but I don’t like to express that too much.”

“What kind of things?” asked the KSPR reporter.

Clevenger replied: “There are some things that are going on in this country that are destroying us. We’ve got a false economy and some of those corporations are run by Jews,” he said. “The fact that the Federal Reserve prints up phony money and freely hands it out, I think that’s completely wrong. The people that run the Federal Reserve, they’re Jewish.”

This is not the first time Clevenger has publicly supported Miller’s anti-Semitism. KSPR unearthed a letter he sent a decade ago to the Aurora Advertiser, in which the mayor endorsed Miller.

“I am a friend of Frazier Miller helping to spread his warnings,” wrote Clevenger. “The Jew-run medical industry has succeeded in destroying the United State’s workforce… Made a few Jews rich by killin’ us off.”

www.kspr.com/news/local/marionville-mayor-i-agree-with-frazier-millers-beliefs-not-behaviors/21051620_25503568

 

PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY SPOKESMAN ACCUSES AL-QAEDA LEADER OF BEING A “ZIONIST”

The spokesman for Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’s Fatah party has accused al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri of supporting “Zionism”.

He was responding to an audio recording published on Friday night on a Jihadi website, in which al-Zawahiri criticized Egyptian presidential candidate Abdel Fatah el-Sissi, American President Barack Obama, and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.

“Abbas is a traitor who sold Palestine,” Zawahiri said, among other things.

The Israeli paper Yediot Ahronot notes today that Fatah spokesman Ahmad Assaf replied to Zawahiri on his Facebook yesterday: “Ayman Zawairi’s statements confirm once again this man’s involvement along with al-Qaeda in the Zionist project and scheming aimed at tearing apart the Arab and Islamic nations.”

“Since when has this hypocrite and his group cared about Palestinian cause? We haven’t seen one [terrorist] action carried out by them against the Israeli occupation,” he complained.

 

MEDIA SPECULATES ON THE “MEANING” OF HILLARY CLINTON’S “JEWISH” GRANDCHILD

Since Chelsea Clinton and her Jewish husband Marc Mezvinsky announced last Thursday that they are expecting their first child, there has been considerable media speculation about whether Bill and Hillary Clinton’s first grandchild will be raised as a Jew.

Several Jewish publications said they welcomed the news that the child is likely to be raised with a Jewish identity – just as Chelsea’s wedding had many Jewish components.

But the orthodox newspaper, The Jewish Press, ran a headline: “Chelsea Clinton Pregnant With Non-Jewish Child,” adding that the pair was “effectively pruning away that 3,300 year old Jewish branch of the Mezvinsky family.”

Orthodox and Conservative Jews believe a child is only Jewish if the mother is Jewish (or the child converts) but Reform and Reconstructionist Jews are more flexible in their definitions.

The extreme-right media have also been covering the story. The leading anti-Semitic publication Stormfront (which incidentally often reproduces extreme left wing articles by Israel-bashing Jews) ran the headline: “Chelsea Clinton pregnant with jew spawn,” noted the JTA.

Tom Gross adds: There is a reasonable chance that Hillary will be America’s next president although I very much doubt that the way her grandchild is raised will make any difference to her Middle East policies.

In the past Hillary has on occasion appeared to sympathize with the Middle East’s only democracy, but at other times she has strongly criticized her.

 

ITALIAN POLICE RAID HOMES OF PROMINENT ANTI-SEMITES

Police and prosecutors in northern Italy have raided the homes of people associated with the anti-Semitic website “Holywar” and charged them with racial discrimination and incitement to harm a long list of well known Jews – and of those who have expressed sympathy for Jews, such as Pope Francis.

The Italian news agency ANSA noted that the website “depicted the pontiff in photoshopped images dressed as a bearded Orthodox Jew waving the Israeli flag with a swastika at the center of the Star of David.”

Other non-Jews targeted in letters, brochures, CDs and DVDs, because they supposedly expressed support for Jews include Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi, former Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, European Central Bank chief Mario Draghi and actor/director Roberto Benigni, who won an Oscar for his Holocaust-era film “Life Is Beautiful”.

 

DUTCH STUDENT EXPOSES POST-WAR AMSTERDAM HOLOCAUST SCANDAL

Charlotte van den Berg, was a 20-year-old college student working part-time in Amsterdam’s city archives, when she discovered a trove of letters from Dutch Jewish Holocaust survivors complaining that the city authorities in Amsterdam were forcing them to pay municipal taxes and late payment fines with interest, on property seized and used by Dutch and German Nazis while they were being held in Nazi concentration camps.

The Associated Press reported two days ago:

How, the survivors asked, could they be on the hook for taxes due while Hitler’s regime was trying to exterminate them? A typical response was: “The base fees and the fines for late payment must be satisfied, regardless of whether a third party, legally empowered or not, has for some time held the title to the building.”

AP continued: “Following her discovery four years ago, Van den Berg waged a lonely fight against Amsterdam’s modern bureaucracy to have the travesty publicly recognized. Now, largely due to her efforts, Amsterdam officials have finally admitted the cover up and are considering compensating Holocaust survivors for the taxes and other obligations, including gas bills, they were forced to pay for homes that were occupied by Nazis or collaborators while the rightful owners were in hiding or awaiting death in the camps.”

Van den Berg and other students found 342 cases from 1947 in which the city demanded that returning Jews pay the taxes and penalty fees for getting behind in their payments.

Two Dutch newspapers, Het Parool and De Telegraaf, published leaked copies of the documents this week. Many of the homes were lived in by Dutch Nazi collaborators who left the bills unpaid and fled at the end of the war.

75 % of Dutch Jews were murdered in the Holocaust – the highest proportion of any country in Western Europe. And contrary to popular myth, far from putting up much resistance against the Nazis, the Dutch were particularly keen collaborators. Only 30,000 Dutch Jews survived the war.

Last year, Van der Berg heard that the documents were “one signature away” from being destroyed, as other documents from the era had been. In desperation, she said, she turned her findings over to the Amsterdam newspaper Het Parool.

A Dutch Jewish leader, Ronny Nafthaniel, this week called Van der Berg “an absolute hero”. “She pushed her bosses and all the civil servants around her to open up these files, even when they told her not to bother,” he said.

 

STABBING POOR COWS IN THE EYE IN GAZA

Animal welfare activists in Australia have released new video footage documenting alleged abuse of Australian cattle in Gaza, reports the Sydney Morning Herald.

“Animals Australia” says videos taken between February and last week show that live export regulations continue to be ignored with “horrific consequences” for Australian animals. [Warning, graphic footage: animalsaustralia-media.org/upload/photos/live-export-gaza2014/]

The organization says it has reported six incidents in Gaza to Australia’s Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry since the start of this year, “but that mistreatment in Gaza is continuing to occur on a nightly basis.”

One piece of footage shows a bull being stabbed in the eye.

“Animals Australia” says investigators shot the videos at the one Hamas government-approved slaughterhouse in Gaza, as well as a number of unauthorized abattoirs.

(Tom Gross adds:: It would be nice if Australian rights groups would also complain to Hamas about the regular use of live rocket fire used to indiscriminately target Jewish civilians in Israel.)

 

THOUSANDS HOLD JERUSALEM RALLY CALLING FOR THE LEGALIZATION OF MARIJUANA

After thousands of people turned up for a pro-marijuana demonstration in Israel’s capital last night, that police had to seal off the park next to Israel’s parliament, the Knesset, to head off protestors.

The protesters were still blocking the entry road to the Knesset early this morning, forcing police to move in to try and clear the road, leading to clashes with police. 25 people were arrested in what was billed as the “Big Bong Night Protest.”

Many in Israel – which is some respects is one of the most liberal countries in the world – support the legalization of marijuana and say the police should stop wasting resources prosecuting people who use it. At least 11 members of the Knesset have publicly admitted taking cannabis in the past.

***

Among related dispatches, please see:

* UN chief admits bias against Israel (& Getting high beyond the Green Line) (August 17, 2013)

* Daily Muslim call to prayer on British public TV (& Israeli rabbis: Weed “can be kosher”) (July 3, 2013)

* Burgers, fries and marijuana (& Knesset members join the fun) (June 9, 2012)

* Israeli army to combat stress with cannabis (and other items) (August 6, 2004)

 

“ECHOES FROM A LOST WORLD”

In a dispatch last week, I thanked Haaretz writer Gideon Levy for mentioning me in passing at the end of an article on his grandparents, but I failed to say anything more about the article. Several people wrote asking to know more. You can read it here:

In Hebrew.

In English.

[Notes above by Tom Gross]


“Why is this year different from all others?” (& Scarlett: Anti-Semitism is to blame)

April 14, 2014

The Beresheet Hotel has reportedly been fully booked by one man

 

[This dispatch has items mainly connected to the Jewish Passover holiday, which starts this evening.]

* Scarlett Johansson, in an interview to be published as the cover story for May’s edition of Vanity Fair: Anti-Semitism is behind much of criticism of Israel

* Spanish village says it may agree to remove words “kill Jews” from its name

* Roman Abramovich to celebrate Passover in the Israeli desert; takes over entire luxury hotel

* Michael Freund: “Passover is a festival of redemption, a time when families typically come together around the Seder table, enjoy each other’s company and revel in the abundant rituals and symbolism. But during the Middle Ages, the holiday unfortunately came to be associated with an entirely different theme, one that has bedeviled the Jewish people for nearly nine centuries and has recently been making a bit of a comeback: the infamous blood libel. It was precisely 870 years ago, in 1144, that the first recorded incident of this slanderous slur in the medieval era took place in England, when the body of 12-year-old William of Norwich was found close to Passover bearing signs of brutal torture.”

* “A Jewish convert to Catholicism, Theobald of Cambridge, was quick to corroborate the calumny, falsely claiming that rabbis and Jewish leaders would gather each year in Spain and draw lots to decide in which country they would kill a Christian child to use his blood in ritual practices… the myth succeeded in spreading rapidly across Europe.” [Some might argue this is the case now, with some extremist former Jews helping to stir up anti-Semitism.]

* Last Passover, the website belonging to a Palestinian organization started by Hanan Ashrawi published an article criticizing Barack Obama for hosting a Passover Seder, saying: “Does Obama in fact know the relationship, for example, between ‘Passover’ and ‘Christian blood’?! Or ‘Passover’ and ‘Jewish blood rituals?!’… Much of the chatter and gossip about historical Jewish blood rituals in Europe are real and not fake as they claim; the Jews used the blood of Christians in the Jewish Passover.”

 

* You can comment on this dispatch here: www.facebook.com/TomGrossMedia. Please also press “Like” on that page.

 

CONTENTS

1. Three dead in pre-Passover shootings at Jewish buildings in Kansas City
2. Scarlett Johansson: Anti-Semitism behind criticism of Israel and me
3. Spanish village says it may agree to remove words “kill Jews” from its name
4. Teacher at top London school tells Jewish teen to go to the gas chambers
5. Video: “Drunk with Freedom”
6. Abramovich “books all 111 rooms of luxury Israeli hotel for Passover holiday”
7. France’s former first lady Carla Bruni: “I’m crazy about Israel”
8. Egyptian columnist demands compensation for 10 plagues
9. “Passover blood libels, then and now” (By Michael Freund, Jerusalem Post, April 13, 2014)
10. “Why is this year different from all others?” (By Dr. Haim Shine, Israel Hayom, April 13, 2014)


[Notes below by Tom Gross]

3 DEAD IN PRE-PASSOVER SHOOTINGS AT JEWISH BUILDINGS IN KANSAS CITY

Three persons (including a 14-year-old boy and an elderly woman) were shot dead at two Jewish-related locations in Kansas City, yesterday. A 74-year-old man (some reports say he is 73), Frasier Glenn Cross, Jr. from Missouri, who is a known anti-Semite and former grand dragon of the Ku Klux Klan, and has been arrested. He is also reported to be a comment leaver (under the name “Glenn Miller”) and fan linking to the anti-Zionist website run by extreme left-wing Jew Max Blumenthal.

The first shooting took place at the Jewish Community Center in Overland Park, Kansas, and the second at the Village Shalom center, an assisted living facility.

The suspect asked people if they were Jewish before opening fire, CNN reported.

Witnesses said that the suspect yelled “Heil Hitler” as he was being led away in handcuffs by Overland Park police.

Two of the victims at the Jewish Community Center were not in fact Jewish, but just visiting the center.

 

JOHANSSON: ANTI-SEMITISM BEHIND CRITICISM OF ISRAEL AND ME

American actress Scarlett Johansson, who has a Jewish mother, has said for the first time that she believes anti-Semitism is to blame for many of the vicious attacks on her and Israel following her endorsement of the Israeli company SodaStream, which employs equal numbers of Israelis and Palestinians working together.

“There’s a lot of anti-Semitism out there,” Johansson tells Vanity Fair, in an interview which will appear as the cover story of the May edition next month.

Johansson resigned from her position as ambassador for (the anti-Israel charity) Oxfam in January, after the organization objected to the actress’ promotion of SodaStream. She said at the time that she was stepping down from the role because of a “fundamental difference of opinion.”

***

For background on this, please see this dispatch:

Palestinians to Oxfam: Back off and let us work (& ScoJo to visit Israel).

 

SPANISH VILLAGE SAYS IT MAY AGREE TO REMOVE WORDS ‘KILL JEWS’ FROM ITS NAME

The village of Castrillo Matajudios near Leon in northern Spain has invited the population to a town hall meeting this week to discuss whether to change the village’s name.

The Spanish regional daily Diario de Burgos reported on Friday that Mayor Lorenzo Rodriguez, will suggest to residents to change the village’s name back to Castrillo Mota de Judios, which means “Castrillo Jews’ Hill,” which was the village’s original name before the Spanish Inquisition.

The Jewish Telegraphic Agency reports that in parts of Spain, locals use the term “killing Jews” (matar Judios) to describe the traditional drinking at festivals held in city squares at Easter. The name originates from medieval times, when converted Jews would be publicly executed in show trials at around Easter / Passover.

 

TEACHER AT TOP LONDON SCHOOL TELLS JEWISH TEEN TO GO TO THE GAS CHAMBERS

The Mail on Sunday (in Britain) reports yesterday that a teacher at one of London’s top girls schools told a distraught Jewish pupil “Go to the back of the queue, or I’ll send you to one of your gas chambers.”

Many of the girl’s family died in the Holocaust. Like many elite London schools, the school, North London Collegiate School, previously had quotas to ensure not too many Jews were able to attend, but with the lifting of the quotas Jews have excelled at the entrance exam and now account for about 25 % of the pupils.

Former pupils of the prestigious institution include film star Rachel Weisz, TV personality Esther Rantzen and Vogue editor Anna Wintour.

The teacher has admitted making the remark but the school has so far not said it will take disciplinary action against the teacher.

***

A reader adds: One can only imagine the outcry if she’d said to a black student “I’ll have you whipped and sent into slavery” or something similar. She’d be fired pretty quickly, and rightly so.

 

VIDEO: “DRUNK WITH FREEDOM”

This is a Passover video in which students at Israel’s Technion show how to devise a machine that can “cross the Red Sea, and fill a glass of the wine on the Passover Seder table” -- all without human intervention.

You can watch the video here:




 

ABRAMOVICH “BOOKS ALL 111 ROOMS OF LUXURY ISRAELI HOTEL FOR PASSOVER HOLIDAY”

Roman Abramovich, the Russian-born billionaire owner of Chelsea football club, has reportedly booked all 111 rooms in the Beresheet Hotel in the Israeli Negev desert resort of Mitzpe Ramon, to host family and friends between Sunday and Thursday this week for the Jewish Passover holiday.

A Passover Seder will take place in a specially constructed tent in the desert – not too far from where the biblical Passover story occurred. The cost of the hotel and rooms for the week is said to amount to $450,000.

Abramovich has two children, Aaron and Leah, with his partner Darya Zhukova. Zhukova, who is a fashion designer and businesswoman, is reported to be a billionaire in her own right. She was born in Russia but grew up in California with her Jewish mother after her parents divorced.

Last time Abramovich spent Passover in Israel, in 2009, he only rented an entire floor of 36 rooms in the Royal Beach Hotel in the Red Sea resort of Eilat.

Abramovich has reportedly been to Israel several times in the past year, visiting technology parks with a view to making investments in the country’s high-tech sector, which is a world leader.

 

FRANCE’S FORMER FIRST LADY CARLA BRUNI: “I’M CRAZY ABOUT ISRAEL”

France’s former first lady Carla Bruni has said she is “crazy about Israel” and loves the country. “It’s full of life,” she added.

The remarks come as more and more celebrities are declaring their support and sympathy for Israel while others are urging a cultural, economic and academic boycott.

Bruni, a singer, guitarist and former model, is scheduled to give a concert in Tel Aviv on May 25, and said that she hoped to bring both her husband, former president Nicolas Sarkozy, and her son with her.

Italian-born Bruni has a Jewish father. She has visited Israel twice before.

Bruni’s remarks have been picked up in the Arab press, for example, here:

english.alarabiya.net/en/variety/2014/04/13/France-s-former-first-lady-is-crazy-about-Israel-.html

 

EGYPTIAN COLUMNIST DEMANDS COMPENSATION FOR 10 PLAGUES

Ahmad Al-Gamal, a prominent Egyptian columnist, has written an article stating: “We demand that the State of Israel pay compensation for the ten plagues that our forefathers in Egypt suffered thousands of years ago as a result of the curses of the Jewish forefathers.”

“The Jews caused the land to be stricken with locusts and all agriculture destroyed, turned the Nile red with blood so that one could drink its waters, sent darkness, frogs and killed the firstborn.”

“What is written in the Torah is that Pharaoh discriminated against the children of Israel. What have we to do with it?” wrote Al-Gamal.

He also recommended that Egypt bring charges against France, Britain and Turkey for those nations’ historical conquests of Egypt.

The Egyptian column has been picked up by the Israeli press. One columnist in Israel wrote in response that Egypt needs first to compensate Israel for keeping the “Jewish forefathers” as slaves for hundreds of years and for killing all male Jewish babies in the generation prior to the Exodus.

Another pointed out that “The Pre-Islamic Arab race never existed at this time. Ancient Egypt was not Arab.”

Another said: “Just don’t take the case to the U.N. Or ask Obama-Kerry to settle it.”

I attach two articles below.

-- Tom Gross

 

EXTRA NOTE

I don’t always agree with his articles on the Middle East, but I would like to thank Haaretz writer Gideon Levy for mentioning me in passing in today’s Passover edition of Haaretz (Hebrew edition). It is an article on his grandparents.

***

One of the previous dispatches was blocked from being delivered to almost 100 subscribers on this list (including to those using Gmail and Hotmail). If you have not seen it and wish to read it, you can do so at the link below.

There are 15 different items in it:

Pakistani baby goes on trial for "plotting murder" (& the world's most beautiful bookshops).


ARTICLES

WHY IS THIS YEAR DIFFERENT FROM ALL OTHERS?

Why is this year different from all others?
By Dr. Haim Shine
Israel Hayom
April 13, 2014

Precisely 70 years ago, during the Seder of 1944 in Auschwitz, 10 Jews were seated – including my grandfather, blessed be his memory – quietly singing, almost silently, “Why is this night different from all other nights?” Their grief was boundless, their pain acute. No child was left behind to ask the Four Questions, for all the children had been carried off to the heavens, lost in the plumes of black smoke billowing off the crematoria smokestacks at the concentration camp.

Their night was long, too long. They had no wine, nor matzot, nor Haggadot, just a full helping of bitter herbs – raw, pungent maror that pierced the soul. As the night wore on, they told the story of the exodus from Egypt. Not a soul arrived to inform them that dawn was approaching and the time had come to recite the morning prayers. Actually, no morning prayers, indeed no morning at all, was stretching across the horizon, simply dismal black skies signaling yet another day of work at the camp. The Prophet Elijah had not come to knock on their front doors, the sea had not split in two before them. They hobbled, in an unsteady march, beaten, battered and torn toward another day of forced labor. They were utterly convinced that this was their last Seder on Earth. Barely a glimmer of hope remained, for the final candle had been snuffed out.

Tomorrow evening in Nahariya, I will join my fellow soldiers, disabled veterans from all of Israel’s wars, in sitting around the Seder table as free men in our homeland, to which we returned despite all odds.

The grandchildren sitting around the table will ask the Four Questions. Together we will drink four glasses of wine and recall at length our forbearers’ exodus from Egypt after hundreds of years of slavery. We will retell how a large group of slaves came together, deciding to become a nation, and rose up, setting off on the arduous journey toward salvation.

Yossi, a disabled veteran who was injured as a paratrooper fighting in the 1967 Six-Day War, will recreate the legend of Jerusalem’s liberation, crowning our joy with the holiest of cities. Together, we will conclude the Seder with a triumphant rendition of “Next Year in Jerusalem.” Immediately following, we will recite the poem “Karev Yom” (“The Day is Approaching”): “Place guards over Your City all day and all night / Lighten the darkness of the night with the light of day.” Indeed, a brilliant light to illuminate our lives as a nation after so many gloomy years.

A meager 600,000-person community stood against all the Arab armies. Millions of Jews have immigrated to Israel and have been absorbed within its borders. Despite the wars and a complex security environment, one of the world’s leading centers for industry, science and medicine has flourished. Above all else, Ezekiel’s prophetic vision has been fulfilled in our time: “But ye, O mountains of Israel, ye shall shoot forth your branches, and yield your fruit to My people Israel; for they are at hand to come. ... And I will multiply men upon you, all the house of Israel, even all of it; and the cities shall be inhabited, and the waste places shall be builded” (Ezekiel 36:8-10). The Land of Israel, for thousands of years lying in wait, stirred as its sons returned home. The Land of Israel has been developed everywhere.

The true meaning of liberation is having responsibility. At the root of responsibility is concern for others, and this chain can never be secure as long as there is a weak link.

The Passover Haggadah starts out by extending an invitation for all who are needy to come and partake in the Seder meal. We should extend that invitation throughout the year as well. The battle against poverty is a struggle over the essence of society, its values and its strength.

Free men should not be frightened by foreign threats. Our close neighbors and distant allies must understand that Israeli citizens are determined and strong – nobody can threaten us. Our days as downtrodden slaves are over. Passover’s spirit of liberation must communicate to the world that the Jewish nation has come together in the Land of Israel; it has risen up with no intention to surrender.

 

“THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY WAS IMPRISONED AND THEN SENTENCED TO BE BURNED TO DEATH”

Passover blood libels, then and now
By Michael Freund
The Jerusalem Post
April 13, 2014

Passover is a festival of redemption, a day when we celebrate our forefathers’ exodus from Egypt and the start of their collective journey to the Promised Land.

Nowadays, it is a time when families typically come together around the Seder table, enjoy each other’s company and revel in the abundant rituals and symbolism.

But during the Middle Ages, the holiday unfortunately came to be associated with an entirely different theme, one that has bedeviled the Jewish people for nearly nine centuries and has recently been making a bit of a comeback: the infamous blood libel.

It was precisely 870 years ago, in 1144, that the first recorded incident of this slanderous slur in the medieval era took place in England, when the body of 12-year-old William of Norwich was found close to Passover bearing signs of brutal torture.

A local monk named Thomas of Monmouth wrote a book in Latin about the episode three decades later, in which he asserted that the Jews, “collecting all the cunning of their crafty plots,” tricked young William, who, “like an innocent lamb, was led to the slaughter.”

The monk went on to describe in great detail how “these enemies of the Christian name” tormented their prey, until at last he could no longer endure.

A Jewish convert to Catholicism, Theobald of Cambridge, was quick to corroborate the calumny, falsely claiming that rabbis and Jewish leaders would gather each year in Spain and draw lots to decide in which country they would kill a Christian child to use his blood in ritual practices.

To our modern ears it might sound inconceivable that anyone could possibly believe such nonsense, but the myth succeeded in spreading rapidly across Europe.

And as the late Joshua Trachtenberg pointed out in his seminal work, The Devil and the Jews: The Medieval Conception of the Jew and Its Relation to Modern Anti-Semitism, ritual murder accusations against the Jews had a profound influence on public opinion.

“Crowning the diabolical conception of the Jew,” Trachtenberg wrote, “it rendered him a figure of such sinister horror even in that blood-stained, terror-haunted period that it is little wonder that common folk came to despise and to fear and to hate him with a deep fanatical intensity.”

While the Norwich incident did not result in any known attacks against Jews, the first instance of the blood libel to take place in France nearly 30 years later proved far more deadly.

In 1171, the Jewish community of Blois was accused of crucifying a Christian child for Passover and tossing his body into a local river.

The entire community was imprisoned and then sentenced to be burned to death. When the Jews were taken to the auto-da-fe, they were told they could save themselves by converting, but nearly all of them refused to do so, preferring to die and sanctify God’s name.

As the flames engulfed them, the Jews of Blois could be heard singing the “Aleinu” prayer, which underlines the distinction between Israel and the nations, as well as the belief in one God.

Rather quickly, the blood libel and ritual murder accusations began to be hurled against the Jews in a spate of other countries across the European continent at various times of year, often invoking different themes.

Hence, for example, when five Christian children were found dead in the German city of Fulda in December 1235, the Jews were accused of having killed them in order to use their blood for medicinal purposes. As a result, 34 Jewish men and women were murdered by Crusaders.

A sign of just how popular the blood libel was in the public’s imagination can be found in The Canterbury Tales, Geoffrey Chaucer’s 14th-century literary classic.

Though it was written nearly 100 after King Edward I expelled English Jewry in 1290, it contains a passage that is chilling in its hateful depiction of Jews.

In the Prioress’s Tale, Chaucer writes that after a Christian child sings a hymn, “the Serpent Satan that has his wasps’ nest in Jews’ hearts,” inspires them to abduct and murder the child and cast his body into a pit, “where these Jews purge their entrails.”

Throughout the subsequent centuries, from Spain to Hungary, Jewish communities were repeatedly victimized by such spurious allegations, often resulting in the spilling of a great deal of innocent Jewish blood.

Even in the 19th century, there was a series of infamous libel episodes, such as the Damascus affair in 1840, when Jews were blamed for the murder of a Capuchin monk and his servant.

And in 1911, a Russian Jew named Menahem Mendel Beilis living in Kiev was arrested and accused of ritually murdering a 13-year-old boy and mutilating his body. He was put in trial in 1913 and acquitted after the prosecution’s case fell apart.

Needless to say, the Nazis did not hesitate to revive the blood libel, using its imagery throughout the 1930s to further stoke the flames of German hatred for the Jews.

EVEN IN our modern, more progressive era, the lie continues to live on. And whereas the libel was once primarily the domain of Christendom, nowadays it is frequently invoked by Israel’s Arab foes.

In May of last year, as the Middle East Media Research Institute revealed, an Egyptian politician named Khaled Zaafrani said the following during a television interview: “it is well-known that during Passover they make matzos called the ‘Blood of Zion.’ They take a Christian child, slit his throat, and slaughter him… they never forgo this rite.”

In addition, the website belonging to a Palestinian organization started by Hanan Ashrawi published an article in March 2013 criticizing US President Barack Obama for hosting a Passover Seder, which read as follows: “Does Obama in fact know the relationship, for example, between ‘Passover’ and ‘Christian blood’?! Or ‘Passover’ and ‘Jewish blood rituals?!’“ Furthermore, noted the article, “much of the chatter and gossip about historical Jewish blood rituals in Europe are real and not fake as they claim; the Jews used the blood of Christians in the Jewish Passover.”

Subsequently, after coming under heavy criticism, the article was taken down.

Of course, anyone who takes even a cursory glance at the Torah’s explicit prohibition against consuming blood, and the Sages’ warnings against it, would quickly grasp the absurd nature of the blood libel allegations.

Nevertheless, this vicious canard has continued to haunt our people for much of its modern existence.

As we celebrate our deliverance on Passover, what are we to make of all this? Perhaps the most inspired and comforting answer to this conundrum was provided by none other than Zionist thinker and writer Ahad Ha’am.

In one of his essays, he seizes upon the world’s acceptance of the blood libel and turns it into a source of consolation for the beleaguered people of Israel. “Every Jew,” he wrote, “who has been brought up among Jews knows as an indisputable fact that throughout the length and breadth of Jewry, there is not a single individual who drinks human blood for religious purposes. ‘But’ – you ask – ‘is it possible that everybody can be wrong, and the Jews right?’ Yes, it is possible: the blood accusation proves it possible. Here, you see, the Jews are right and perfectly innocent.”

Although written nearly a century ago, Ahad Ha’am’s words remain as resonant as ever.

For at a time when Israel’s legitimacy and very existence are increasingly questioned, and the specious propaganda of our foes is so readily believed, the history of the blood libel does indeed remind us of an important truth: Our cause is just, even if the world may think otherwise.

Pakistani baby tried for “planning murder”; new poison gas attack; the world’s most beautiful bookshops

April 05, 2014

The El Ateneo bookshop, Buenos Aires, housed in the former Teatro Grand Splendid

 

* Assad’s forces accused of new poison gas attack
* Pakistan court puts nine-month-old baby on trial for “planning a murder” and “and interfering in state affairs”
* London Evening Standard cites Avraham Stern as “one of the most dangerous men in the world” -- in 1942!
* Video: The Putin-Palin phone call

 

[Note by Tom Gross]

Below are a variety of items I have read in recent days, which I thought were under-reported, interesting or amusing. Some are lighter items, unconnected to the Middle East, to counterbalance the often intense and depressing items in these “Middle East dispatches”. (I also posted a number of these items on my public and private Facebook pages in recent days, and if you want to get other such items, please “like” this page.)

I have also read editorials and comment pieces (some dressed up as news reporting) on Israel in recent days in the New York Times and Financial Times which I found to be so duplicitous, so utterly skewered about Israel, that it is too depressing and too time-consuming to pick them apart here. I can only say that the Arab, and even in some cases the Iranian reports I have read on the same matters in the last couple of days, are in some ways more balanced and give readers a more accurate sense of what actually happened.

 

CONTENTS

1. Assad’s forces accused of new poison gas attack
2. Former Arsenal soccer star “joins Jihadi fighters waging war in Syria”
3. Bin Laden even watched the European Cup Winners’ Cup final
4. U.S. government allows Boeing to sell plane parts to Iran
5. Afghan photos
6. Pakistan: Nine-month-old baby accused of planning murder
7. What passes as intelligent writing about “Zionists”
8. Deaf woman hears for first time
9. Ten of the world’s most beautiful bookshops
10. The Vladimir Putin & Sarah Palin phone call on the “Tonight Show”
11. The European Disunion
12. Putin announces historic G1 summit
13. Fifteen things you didn’t know your iPhone could do
14. Can you die of a broken heart?
15. It was 50 years ago today…


[Notes below by Tom Gross]

ASSAD’S FORCES ACCUSED OF NEW POISON GAS ATTACK

The increasingly bloody war in Syria (and the fate of millions of Syrian refugees) remains disgracefully under-reported. There has been even less reporting since President Obama and other Western leaders made it clear last summer that they would not become involved even after Assad used chemical weapons to murder hundreds of children. Most of the savagery is still being committed by regime units, often under Iranian command and using Russian weapons.

The leading Arab TV news network Al Arabiya (which has generally been proven correct in its reporting on Syria) reports yesterday:

Syrian opposition activists on Friday again accused President Bashar al-Assad’s forces of using chemical weapons near the capital Damascus on Thursday, publishing the video of an apparently unconscious man lying on a bed and being treated by medics.

Activists from the opposition “Jobar Revo” group posted the video on YouTube of a man being treated with oxygen and being injected by medics. A voice off-screen said Thursday’s date and that there was “a poison attack in Jobar.”

(The rest of the piece is here.)

 

FORMER ARSENAL SOCCER STAR “JOINS JIHADI FIGHTERS WAGING WAR IN SYRIA”

From the print edition of today’s (London) Daily Mirror:

Former Arsenal footballer ‘joins Jihadi fighters waging war in Syria’
By Josh Layton
Daily Mirror
April 5, 2014

A former Arsenal star is thought to have joined a band of ruthless Jihadi fighters waging war in Syria.

The gun-toting fanatic is said to have grown up playing with Real Madrid galactico Cristiano Ronaldo.

The militia man turned his back on a footballer’s playboy lifestyle after becoming radicalised two years ago, it is claimed

He is filmed wielding an AK47 and proclaiming holy war in two terror videos on an extremist website.

Fellow jihadists say the fighter – who now calls himself Abu Issa Al-Andalusi – was brought up in Portugal before signing for the Gunners.

In the footage he appears in a mask calling on Muslims to join the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) – an al-Qaeda off-shoot group behind murders and beheadings.

The faction has been blamed for extreme violence against other Islamist groups, Kurds and Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s brutal regime.

(The rest of the piece is here.)

 

BIN LADEN EVEN WATCHED THE EUROPEAN CUP WINNERS’ CUP FINAL

The Daily Mirror adds:

Osama bin Laden was an Arsenal fan during his time living in London.

Fans even used to chant: “Osama, woah-woah, Osama, woah-waoh, he’s hiding in Kabul, he loves the Arsenal”.

The figurehead for global terror was said to have attended a number of matches at Highbury [TG adds: The then Arsenal stadium] in the 1990s.

He watched the Gunners’ run to the European Cup Winners’ Cup final in the 1993/94 season.

Bin Laden was also said to have bought his eldest son, Abdullah, an Ian Wright [TG: who was an Arsenal star] replica shirt.

Arsenal enacted a ban in when the reports first emerged in late 2001. A club spokesman said: “We’ve seen the reports in the papers. Clearly he wouldn’t be welcome at Highbury in the future.”

 

U.S. GOVERNMENT ALLOWS BOEING TO SELL PLANE PARTS TO IRAN

(What about the regime stopping its nuclear weapons program first? -- TG)

Iran News reports:

U.S. Government Allows Boeing To Sell Plane Parts To Iran
April 5, 2014

Aircraft manufacturer Boeing says it has been granted a license from the U.S. Treasury Department to export spare parts for commercial airplanes to Iran.

A spokesman for the company said on April 4 that the license covered a “limited period of time” and allowed the company only “to provide them spare parts that are for safety purposes.”

The sales would be the first acknowledged dealing between U.S. aerospace companies and Iran since the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

(The rest of the piece is here.)

 

AFGHAN PHOTOS

Here is a selection of photos from the wonderful Associated Press photographer Anja Niedringhaus who was murdered in Afghanistan on Friday, shot dead by a policeman because she was not wearing a face covering.

 

PAKISTAN: NINE-MONTH-OLD BABY ACCUSED OF PLANNING MURDER

Pakistan is supposed to be a democracy where the rule of law is applied in a reasonable way. Not so.

 

WHAT PASSES AS INTELLIGENT WRITING ABOUT “ZIONISTS”

British historian, author, and BBC broadcaster Dominic Sandbrook, writing in Friday’s (London) Evening Standard, cites Avraham Stern as “one of the most dangerous men in the world” -- in 1942!!

 

DEAF WOMAN HEARS FOR FIRST TIME

This is a very moving video. The moment a 40-year-old woman hears for the first time in her life, thanks to cochlear implants.

 

TEN OF THE WORLD’S MOST BEAUTIFUL BOOKSHOPS

The BBC has a nice round-up and some beautiful pictures here.

I particularly like the picture of Buenos Aires’ El Ateneo bookshop, housed in the former Teatro Grand Splendid.

 

THE VLADIMIR PUTIN & SARAH PALIN PHONE CALL ON THE “TONIGHT SHOW”

One has to hand it to Sarah Palin for her good humor and self-deprecation here.

 

THE EUROPEAN DISUNION

Atlas of Prejudice – 20 ways to slice the European continent.

 

PUTIN ANNOUNCES HISTORIC G1 SUMMIT

Some satire from Andy Borowitz in The New Yorker:

MOSCOW (The Borowitz Report) – Russian President Vladimir Putin made history today by scheduling the first-ever summit of the newly formed group of nations called the G-1.

The summit, which Putin has set for June in Sochi, is expected to be attended by the G-1 member nation Russia.

Putin pronounced himself delighted by Russia’s attendance, telling reporters, “It is an auspicious start for the G-1 to have the participation of all its member nations.”

In addition to what he called “a free exchange of ideas on issues of importance to the G-1,” the summit is expected to elect the first president of the G-1, a position for which Putin is widely considered the frontrunner.

Putin denied he was a candidate for the post, but added, “It’s an honor just to be in the mix.”

 

15 THINGS YOU DIDN’T KNOW YOUR IPHONE COULD DO

Here. #2 is pretty neat. If #4 had been used, someone might have spotted that missing Malaysian plane.

 

CAN YOU DIE OF A BROKEN HEART?

Apparently, love can kill. But then poets have always known that – science is catching up.

 

IT WAS 50 YEARS AGO TODAY…

This weekend marks the 50th anniversary of the only time any band or artist has occupied all five top positions in America’s Billboard charts.

It was, of course, The Beatles. The Fab Four’s Fab five.

The top 5 of the Billboard Hot 100 ranking on April 4-11, 1964 was:

1. Can't Buy Me Love

2. Twist and Shout

3. She Loves You

4. I Want to Hold Your Hand

5. Please Please Me

[Notes above by Tom Gross]

No Chinese-born scientist has ever won a Nobel: “We want to learn from Israel” (& first Chinese rabbi in 200 years)

April 02, 2014

Writer Michael Freund (his article is below) stands next to China’s new rabbi, Yaakov Wang

 

Tom Gross writes:

This is one in an occasional series of dispatches on China. I attach four articles, with some notes first for this who don’t have time to read them in full.

Among related dispatches: How China is quietly building links with Israel (April 9, 2012)

***

* Chinese myths about Jews – news headlines like “Do the Jews Really Control America?” and books with titles like “101 Money Earning Secrets From Jews” – are often meant in a positive way by their authors, but are still deeply disturbing, and of course totally inaccurate.

* Chinese tycoon Chen Guangbiao who bid to buy the Wall Street Journal, explained that he would be an ideal newspaper magnate because “I am very good at working with Jews” – who, he added, controlled the media. (Tom Gross adds: The WSJ is, of course, owned by Rupert Murdoch, who is not Jewish, and nor is the paper’s editor. Very few papers in the U.S. or U.K. are owned or edited by Jews.)

* The vast majority of Chinese have few, if any, concrete ideas about the reality of Jewish history or practices.

* New university courses are being launched in China to teach Jewish history and culture – as well as courses in Ancient Jewish History, Rabbinic Literature and Holocaust Studies.

* “Xu delved into Freud; he said he also held immense respect for Henry Kissinger, who orchestrated the start of American relations with China. Like Salinger, Bellow, Freud, and the godfather of Communism Karl Marx, Kissinger was a Jew. ‘He was a refugee and an immigrant to the U.S., but within 20 years he had made his way to become secretary of State. How come?’ Xu wondered.” ... “We started to feel from the bottom heart there is something wrong with Chinese society. China needs new ideas.” [Tom Gross adds: And hopefully new ideas will also bring respect for human rights.]

* Today, there is growing Chinese interest in Israeli technology and science. The Chinese have noted that no Chinese-born scientist has ever been awarded a Nobel Prize for work in the mainland, whereas Israelis win year after year. “We want to learn from Israel,” said one Chinese scholar. “Had the Jews achieved nothing, no Chinese would be interested in them.”

***

* In fact Jews have lived in China for almost 1,000 years. And in modern times, tens of thousands of Jewish refugees fleeing Nazi Germany were given shelter in Shanghai (including, for example, the family of former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert).

* In 1163, Kaifeng’s Jews built a large and beautiful synagogue. By the 17th century, Chinese Jews had attained high ranks in the Chinese civil service. Then they started to become increasingly assimilated.

* This month, Yaakov Wang, a descendant of the Jewish community of Kaifeng, became the first Chinese rabbi in 200 years.

 

You can comment on this dispatch here: www.facebook.com/TomGrossMedia. Please also press “Like” on that page.


CONTENTS

1. “The Chinese believe that the Jews control America. Is That a Good Thing?” (By Clarissa Sebag-Montefiore, Tablet, March 27, 2014)
2. “‘I am very good at working with Jews,’ says Chinese tycoon trying to buy WSJ” (South China Morning Post, Jan. 9, 2014 )
3. “The first Chinese rabbi in 200 years” (By Michael Freund, The Jerusalem Post, March 27, 2014)
4. “China’s ancient Jewish enclave” (By Matthew Fishbane, New York Times travel section, April 4, 2010)

 

ARTICLES

GROWING CHINESE INTEREST IN JEWS AND ISRAEL

The Chinese Believe That the Jews Control America. Is That a Good Thing?
By Clarissa Sebag-Montefiore
Tablet (online magazine)
March 27, 2014

“Do the Jews Really Control America?” asked one Chinese newsweekly headline in 2009. The factoids doled out in such articles and in books about Jews in China – for example: “The world’s wealth is in Americans’ pockets; Americans are in Jews’ pockets” – would rightly be seen to be alarming in other contexts. But in China, where Jews are widely perceived as clever and accomplished, they are meant as compliments. Scan the shelves in any bookstore in China and you are likely to find best-selling self-help books based on Jewish knowledge. Most focus on how to make cash. Titles range from 101 Money Earning Secrets From Jews’ Notebooks to Learn To Make Money With the Jews.

The Chinese recognize, and embrace, common characteristics between their culture and Jewish culture. Both races have a large diaspora spread across the globe. Both place emphasis on family, tradition, and education. Both boast civilizations that date back thousands of years. In Shanghai, I am often told with nods of approval that I must be intelligent, savvy, and quick-witted, simply because of my ethnicity. While it is true that the Chinese I’ve met are fascinated by – rather than fear – the Jews, these assertions make me deeply uncomfortable.

So, it was with a degree of apprehension that I recently traveled to the former imperial capital of Nanjing to spend the day with Prof. Xu Xin, director of the Diane and Guilford Glazer Institute of Jewish and Israel Studies at Nanjing University. The first thing Xu did was suggest lunch. As we sat down to a steaming tofu hot pot, he woefully conceded that many Chinese believe the Jews to be “smart, rich, and very cunning.” Just before my visit to Nanjing, the Chinese tycoon Chen Guangbiao made international headlines by publicly announcing his ambitions to buy the New York Times and later the Wall Street Journal. In a TV interview he explained that he would be an ideal newspaper magnate because “I am very good at working with Jews” – who, he said, controlled the media.

Yet Chen presumably, like the majority of Chinese, has few concrete ideas about the reality of Jewish history or practices. Xu, the 65-year-old pioneer of Jewish studies in China, is campaigning to change that – and, by doing so, challenging entrenched stereotypes. The diminutive professor has made it his life’s pursuit to present a more nuanced view of the Jewish race and religion to his countrymen: one based on scholarship rather than rumor. To this end he launched the Institute of Jewish Studies in 1992, the first of its kind in Chinese higher education.

Today there are more than half a dozen similar programs across the country, many started by Xu’s former students. In Nanjing, Judaica courses – from Ancient Jewish History to Rabbinic Literature to Holocaust Studies – have proved popular. According to Xu one of the best-attended courses in the institute is Jewish Culture and World Civilization, in which 18 topics are covered in a 20-week semester. It attracts roughly 200 undergraduate students per term. Survey of Judaism and Study of Monotheism, both graduate courses, have enrollments of around 30 to 40.

Strung up around the unheated classrooms of the institute are dated photographs of Jerusalem and fuzzy black-and-white images of the death camps. Bookshelves boast Chinese translations of the Haggadah and Xu’s own books, including his best-selling A History of Jewish Culture. In a glass cabinet sit various teaching tools: embroidered kippas, bronze menorahs, and polished shofars. Thankfully, there is not a “get rich quick” manual in sight.

***

The institute is funded largely by foreign Jewish donors, who have their own interest in seeing portrayals of Judaism propagated in a more balanced way. “Hatred and intolerance are bred in ignorance,” the executive director of the China Judaic Studies Association, Beverly Friend, a patron of the institute, wrote to me in an email. “The institute provides knowledge.”

Xu was first introduced to Beverly Friend and her husband Jim in the mid-1980s, when the latter was teaching English at Nanjing University; Jim was the first Jew Xu had ever met. In 1986 Xu traveled to America for the first time, where he stayed with the Friends in Chicago. The trip was revelatory: Not only did he learn how to use a fork but he started attending Shabbat dinners and other Jewish celebrations. It convinced him that China might be able to learn something from the West – and in particular, from Jews.

This conviction was rooted in his own country’s recent resurfacing from a traumatic past. Like many teenagers at the time, Xu was a Red Guard during the Cultural Revolution, one of the zealous youths who helped destroy much of China’s own heritage. “I participated in the Cultural Revolution. We all went through the Great Leap Forward,” Xu said, referring to Mao’s push for industrialization that helped lead to a famine in which more than 30 million perished. “We started to feel from the bottom heart there is something wrong with society. China needed new ideas.”

As China began to open up again to the West, Xu read Western literature, which had been banned under Mao. He’d soon realized that his favorite writers – J.D. Salinger, Saul Bellow, Philip Roth – were Jewish (today, many of their works are translated into Chinese and studied by college and graduate students in China). As psychology became popular, Xu delved into Freud; he also held immense respect for Henry Kissinger, who orchestrated the start of American relations with China. Like Salinger, Bellow, Freud, and the godfather of Communism Karl Marx, Kissinger was a Jew. “He was a refugee and an immigrant to the U.S., but within 20 years he had made his way to become secretary of State. How come?” Xu wondered.

The search for an answer to that question became Xu’s mission. He returned from two years in the United States, and a formative official trip to Israel in 1988, convinced that Judaism could provide lessons for a young and hungry new China. “Once we learned, we wanted to teach,” he said. Xu set up university classes, attended international seminars, and translated the Encyclopedia Judaica into Chinese. Eventually, once diplomatic relations between Israel and China were established in 1992, he founded the Institute of Jewish Studies.

***

If Xu had the sense of discovering something new, the Jews were not exactly strangers to China. Jews likely first arrived in China via the Silk Road almost 1,000 years ago. In the mid-19th century, following the Opium Wars, Iraqi Jews settled alongside British traders in Shanghai, where many made their fortunes. China later accepted Jews taking flight from Russia, who made their homes in the bleak snowy landscapes of northern Harbin. In World War II, tens of thousands of Jewish refugees fleeing Nazi Germany flooded Shanghai: Most left for Australia, America, or Israel when the Communists gained power in 1949.

Chinese state media has long championed positive portrayals of the Jews, in part because Judaism, with its ethnically based and non-evangelical nature, has proved less of a threat to the Communist Party than other foreign monotheistic religions, like Christianity or Islam. (China’s own Jewish population, the Kaifeng Jews , have being almost completely assimilated.) High-profile Jewish figures in the Chinese Communist Party’s own history include Sidney Rittenberg (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidney_Rittenberg), the first American citizen to join the party, and the journalist Israel Epstein, whose funeral was attended by former Chinese President Hu Jintao and former Premier Wen Jiabao.

China’s relationship to the Jewish state is more complicated. In 1990, Xu was invited to participate in a closed meeting of Chinese intellectuals, military personnel, and party officials, which posed the question: Should China initiate formal diplomatic relations with Israel? The answer was no – but times have changed. Today China’s authoritarian government is invested heavily in the oil states, including Iran and Iraq. But it is also increasingly forming ties with Israel . In 2013, Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to China, the first official visit by an Israeli prime minister in six years. Many believe the trip signals growing Chinese interest in Israeli technologies, as China attempts to transform itself from a manufacturing to an innovation-and-knowledge-based economy.

“China is learning more technology from Israel, trading more,” said Xu, who was in the process of creating a specific course on Israel to reflect this change. “China finally decided to establish former diplomatic relations with Israel [in 1992] because they believed that being friendly with Jews is good for China’s development and to change China’s image internationally.” If China’s global clout does not yet match its status as one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, developing closer ties with Israel and the Jewish Diaspora may be a relatively easy way to widen China’s influence, or so some Chinese leaders seem to believe.

Support of Israel also underpins American patronage of the institute. “Bringing China and the Jewish people and specifically the Jewish state, Israel, closer together has merit,” said John Fishel, a consultant for the Glazer Foundation. “There are increasing exchanges between Israel and China on a number of levels including academic, cultural, and economic. The growth of both Jewish Studies and Israel Studies in Chinese universities seems to be creating opportunities for the knowledge base to grow.”

***

Yet on a human level, at least, the geopolitical rationale for greater Chinese-Jewish understanding may pale next to the role that the Jews play in China’s own search to rediscover itself. When Liu Nanyang first studied history of the Middle East at Nanjing University he became interested in how Israel had managed to survive. “There were many Middle East wars, but Israel was still there,” he said. “So, I wanted to know why.”

Now Liu, 28, is a doctoral student conducting research into the Jewish roots of Christianity (he spent one year in Jerusalem as part of his studies). As we sat in the university, clutching paper cups of hot green tea to keep us warm, Liu earnestly rattled off similarities between Jewish and Chinese culture. “Even if some people believe in Buddhism or Daoism or Christianity, they live their everyday life according to Confucianism,” he expounded. “The Jewish people believe in [different] denominations like reform or liberal or even nonreligious. But usually their lives follow traditional ideas.”

Then he paused. “Maybe I should add a difference,” he said cautiously. “Chinese culture is not so tolerant.”

Liu comes from a family of farmers. They are also Christians. In China, where religion is perceived as a threat to the ruling Communist Party, Christians are routinely persecuted and worship is allowed only in officially sanctioned churches. “Any ideas or philosophy or cultures are controlled. In the past it was controlled by the imperial emperors and now by the party,” said Liu. “But Jewish people don’t have such a strong political power. So, [Judaism] has more pluralism.”

It is this space and allowance – even encouragement – for debate that has helped Jews make cultural and scientific strides in the world, Liu said he believed: “In the Talmud, for one question they have different answers. But in China we have [either] correct or incorrect. If someone has different opinions, it is difficult to live.”

“Do you know how many Chinese Nobel Prize winners there are?” asked Liu, not waiting for an answer. He didn’t have to. The Chinese have long articulated ambitions to win more Nobel prizes. (No Chinese-born scientist, for example, has ever been awarded a Nobel Prize for work in the mainland.) “The Jewish population is very small but the Chinese is big,” Liu said. “Compare that, if you will. When we know that the Jewish people are so successful in both science and human studies, we feel that maybe we can learn from them.”

As the afternoon drew to a close, I mentioned Chen Guangbiao, the billionaire who declared he is good at working with Jews. Liu was exasperated by such reductions.

“In their minds, Jewish people control the banks in America. It means for them that Jewish people control the world, controls the governments,” he railed, shaking his hands in disbelief. “I feel it’s a joke.”

Prof. Xu was more understanding. “Stereotypes are overemphasized. But in China this is positive,” he said calmly. After all, he added: “Had the Jews achieved nothing, no Chinese would be interested in them.”

 

“I AM VERY GOOD AT WORKING WITH JEWS”

“I am very good at working with Jews” Says Chinese tycoon trying to buy the New York Times/Wall Street Journal
By Stephanie Butnick
South China Morning Post
January 9, 2014

Chen Guangbiao, a recycling magnate and one of China’s 400 richest people – and a high-profile philanthropist; he’s known for what he calls flashy philanthropy – recently announced his intention to buy the New York Times.

But when Guangbiao, whose fortune was estimated at $740 million in 2012, was rebuffed by the Internet, he changed his tack: he checked to see if the Wall Street Journal was for sale.

And why shouldn’t he own an American newspaper? After all, he boasts what is apparently the most important skill required to do so: he’s good at working with Jews.

Chen had said earlier that he was “serious” about purchasing the Times, so he could work on “rebuilding its credibility and influence” by reforming its award-winning coverage of China.

Chen said he was aware that many American papers were Jewish-owned. He said he was up for the job since he had “equally competent IQ and EQ” compared with Jews.

“I am very good at working with Jews,” he said.

It’s sort of like that Chinese firm who was looking to hire a Jew a few years back, but opposite. Or something.

Guangbiao also got attention this week when his English-language business card, which says things like ‘Most Charismatic Philanthropist’ and ‘Most Well-Known and Beloved Chinese Role Model,’ was published online. Want one for yourself? Try Slate’s superlative-laden business card generator. I’ve already added ‘good at working with Jews’ to mine.

 

THE FIRST CHINESE RABBI IN 200 YEARS

The first Chinese rabbi in 200 years
By Michael Freund
The Jerusalem Post
March 27, 2014

Standing silently in the middle of an open field at his family’s burial plot, Yaakov Wang gazes at his late grandfather’s tombstone, seemingly lost in thought. Just over a year has passed since Yaakov, a descendant of the Jewish community of Kaifeng, China, completed his conversion before a rabbinical court in Jerusalem. And now he has come back to pay his respects at the grave of the man who first taught him about the family’s unique Chinese Jewish heritage.

The symbolism of the moment is powerful and highly emotive, embodying in a microcosm the tentative rebirth that is taking place among the remnants of Chinese Jewry. Growing up in Kaifeng in the 1990s, Yaakov’s grandfather revealed to him that their family was descended from Jews. And while he knew little about Jewish life or lore, he succeeded in imparting to Yaakov a strong sense of Jewish pride. He also told his young grandson that the Jews had a land of their own, very far away, and that all of them, one day, would return there.

The disclosure had a profound impact on Yaakov. Whenever he went out for dinner with his friends, he refrained from eating pork, despite the central role it plays in Chinese cuisine. And when Yaakov told his fellow students in school that he was Jewish, many responded by saying, “now I know why you are cleverer than me.”

As Yaakov grew older, and began to delve more deeply into Kaifeng’s Jewish past, he learned that it was a community with a rich and ancient heritage, much of it unfamiliar to most of world Jewry.

Jews are believed to have first settled in Kaifeng, which was one of China’s imperial capitals, in the 8th century during the Song Dynasty, or perhaps even earlier. Scholars say that they were Sephardi Jewish merchants from Persia or Iraq who made their way eastward along the Silk Route and settled in Kaifeng with the blessing of the Chinese emperor. The Jews quickly established themselves in the city, where they found an environment of tolerance and acceptance, in sharp contrast to much of the rest of the Diaspora.

In 1163, Kaifeng’s Jews built a large and beautiful synagogue, which was subsequently renovated and rebuilt on numerous occasions throughout the centuries. At its peak, during the Ming Dynasty (1368- 1644), the Kaifeng Jewish community may have numbered as many as 5,000 people.

By the 17th century, a number of Chinese Jews had attained high ranks in the Chinese civil service, but along with success came the blight of assimilation, which took an increasingly heavy toll on the community and its cohesion. As a result, by the mid- 1800s, the Chinese Jews’ knowledge and practice of Judaism had largely faded away. The last rabbi of the community is believed to have died in the early part of the 19th century, and the synagogue building was all but destroyed by a series of floods which struck the city in the 1840s and thereafter.

Nevertheless, against all odds, Kaifeng’s Jews struggled to preserve their Jewish identity, passing down whatever little they knew to their progeny.

In the 1920s, a Chinese scholar named Chen Yuan wrote a series of treatises on religion in China, including “A study of the Israelite religion in Kaifeng.” Yuan noted the decline the community had endured, but took pains to recall that the remaining descendants still tried as best they could to observe various customs and rituals, including that of Yom Kippur.

“Although the Kaifeng Jews today no longer have a temple where they can observe this holy day,” Yuan wrote, “they still fast and mourn without fail on the 10th day of the month.”

Nowadays, in this city of over 4.5 million, there are still several hundred people – perhaps a thousand at most – who are descendants of the Jewish community.

Because of intermarriage in preceding generations, most if not all are no longer considered Jewish in the eyes of Jewish law.

But in recent years, an awakening of sorts has taken place, especially among the younger generation of Kaifeng Jewish descendants, many of whom wish to learn more about their heritage and reclaim their roots.

It was this stirring which prompted Yaakov Wang and six other Jewish descendants from Kaifeng to make aliya in October 2009. They were brought to Israel by Shavei Israel, the organization which I founded and chair.

Previously, we had brought a group of four young Kaifeng Jews to Israel in 2006, all of whom successfully completed the conversion process as well.

And with God’s help, we plan to bring more in the coming years.

It is hard to overstate what a miracle this is. By any measure, Chinese Jewry should have disappeared long ago. Between assimilation and Communism, the Jewish flame in Kaifeng should have been snuffed out. And yet, even here, in this far-flung corner of China, the pintele Yid – the Jewish spark in each and every one of us – refuses to be extinguished.

After his solemn visit to his grandfather’s grave, Yaakov reiterates something that he has told me before: he wants to study to become a rabbi – the first Chinese rabbi in 200 years – so that he can help other Kaifeng Jewish descendants to draw closer to Judaism.

Given his intelligence and determination, along with his sense of purpose, Yaakov will undoubtedly succeed, and before long he will bear the title of rabbi and spiritual leader.

While his grandfather did not live to see his own dream of return fulfilled, his soul will undoubtedly derive great satisfaction in knowing that Chinese Jewry is once again coming to life.

And that after nearly disappearing, his own progeny is at last returning home, to rejoin our people in our own Land.

 

WELCOME TO THE TEMPLE OF PURITY AND TRUTH

China’s Ancient Jewish Enclave
By Matthew Fishbane
New York Times travel section
April 4, 2010

THROUGH a locked door in the coal-darkened boiler room of No. 1 Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Kaifeng, there’s a well lined with Ming Dynasty bricks. It’s just a few yards deep and still holds water. Guo Yan, 29, an eager, bespectacled native of this Chinese city on the flood plains of the Yellow River about 600 miles south of Beijing, led me to it one recent Friday afternoon, past the doormen accustomed to her visits.

The well is all that’s left of the Temple of Purity and Truth, a synagogue that once stood on the site. The heritage it represents brings a trickle of travelers to see one of the more unusual aspects of this country: China, too, had its Jews.

Ms. Guo, who identifies herself as a Jew, says she hears it from scholars, visitors and Chinese people alike: “‘You Chinese Jews are very famous,’ they say. ‘But you are only in the history books.’”

That seemed a good enough reason to come looking, and I quickly found that I was hardly alone. Ms. Guo and I were soon joined by a 36-year-old French traveler, Guillaume Audan, who called himself a “nonpracticing Jew” on a six-month world tour of “things not specifically Jewish.” Like me, he’d found Ms. Guo by recommendation, and made the detour to see what the rumored Kaifeng Jews were all about.

Earlier, Ms. Guo had brought us into a narrow courtyard at 21 Teaching Torah Lane – an alley once central to the city’s Jewish community, and still home to her 85-year-old grandmother, Zhao Cui, widow of a descendant of Chinese Jews. Her one-room house has been turned into a sort of dusty display case, with Mrs. Zhao as centerpiece.

“Here are the Kaifeng Jews,” Ms. Guo said, a little defiantly. “We are they.”

We were surrounded by signs that supported Ms. Guo’s statement: A mezuza was attached to the door frame. A copy of the Sh’ma, widely considered the most important of Hebrew prayers, decorated with Chinese lettering, hung on the wall. A menorah sat by a Chinese-style altar displaying a black-and-white portrait of Mr. Zhao.

Indeed, some 50 descendants of Kaifeng’s Jews are embracing this legacy and relearning Jewish ways. And a few, like Ms. Guo, are tapping a quirky vein of religious tourism.

From the 10th to the 12th century, Kaifeng was the capital of the Northern Song Dynasty and a cosmopolitan center on a branch of the Silk Road, attracting Chinese imperial suitors and Persian merchants with camels. Amid this ferment was a small community of Sephardic Jews, who arrived most likely from Persia and India as traders, or perhaps fleeing the Crusades.

Scholars still debate the time of their first arrival, but for at least 700 years, Jews prospered free of persecution, largely out of mind of the various Chinese dynasties that dubbed them “blue-hatted Hui” – people from the West. They settled into trades and, around 1163, built a synagogue. In 1605, the peripatetic Italian Jesuit missionary Matteo Ricci met one of their emissaries in Beijing and reported their existence back to Europe.

But time, isolation and assimilation took their toll. When European missionaries in Kaifeng purchased a 17th-century Hebrew Torah in 1851 (it is now housed at the British Museum in London, one of 15 known Kaifeng scrolls), no locals could read it. The synagogue, which had fallen into neglect after repeated flooding, was never rebuilt.

Yet for 150 years following the death of the last rabbi, tiny embers of a heritage still glowed in Kaifeng. Grandparents told their grandchildren, as Mrs. Zhao told Ms. Guo: “You are a Jew.” Without knowing why, families avoided pork. And at Passover, the old men baked unleavened cakes and dabbed rooster’s blood on their doorstep.

Most Jewish-themed tours of China skip Kaifeng, focusing instead on the immigration of persecuted European Jewry, in cities like Shanghai, Harbin, Tianjin and Beijing. Thanks to American, Israeli and European support of places significant to their own past, Harbin and Shanghai, for example, enjoy a regular flow of tourists to museums and sites of synagogues, restored though no longer used for prayer.

Kaifeng, by comparison, attracts word-of-mouth backpackers and three or four rabbi- or scholar-led Jewish heritage groups a year. Most visitors, according to Shi Lei, a 31-year-old descendant of Chinese Jews who has been leading tours here since he was sent to Israel to study Hebrew and Judaica, stay for a day, “have a look, and leave.”

Part of that has to do with the lack of actual sites to visit. Like an old battlefield, Jewish Kaifeng exists mostly in the imagination of the visitor. Here stood a synagogue. Here once lived the Chinese Jews, who made unleavened bread and ate no pork.

China does not recognize Judaism as one of its five approved religions. And unlike the Muslim Hui people, who populate much of Kaifeng, Jews are not considered one of the country’s 55 minorities. Though foreign Jews are allowed to practice their religion while on Chinese soil, there are currently no officially active synagogues in China. The state, in short, holds that no Chinese Jews exist.

“Teaching Torah Lane gets historical landmark status,” Mr. Shi said, walking me down the narrow alleys of the city’s Muslim quarter, “but no Jews exist in China. What is this history of, then?”

Local authorities seem to tolerate discreet activity from the Jewish community and the visitors it draws. In the Kaifeng Municipal Museum, it takes an extra 50 renminbi and a request to be led to the locked room with three barely legible 1489 and 1512 steles describing the Jewish presence in Kaifeng.

And to see the Jewish pavilion at Millennium City Park, a Song dynasty-period-costumed theme park modeled on a famous painted scroll, Mr. Shi had to ask an attendant to bring keys. The modest exhibition there was put together a decade ago by China’s foremost scholar on Chinese Jews, Xu Xin, who told me the limited access to his display was “a very complicated issue.” With this in mind, Ms. Guo and Mr. Shi both label their tours with a wink: they are taking you to meet “descendants of Jews,” not “Jews.”

On Friday evening, after buying some bread from a Muslim street stand, Ms. Guo took Mr. Audan and me into a half-completed shopping center. She marched purposefully around several corners, past closed shops, to a second-floor balcony of empty stores. Smoggy daylight was waning, but through a curtain in one of the shops came the distinct yellow glow of candles. An Israeli flag was just visible through the glass door. And inside, around a simple gray table, sat a dozen people bowed before ritual books in both Chinese and Hebrew, about to begin their Sabbath prayers. The men wore yarmulkes. The women were perched under a poster of the 10 Commandments, written in Chinese script, hung below photos of their ancestors.

Then the group, most of whom requested anonymity, took turns reading from Hebrew prayer books. Mr. Audan put on a cap and joined in the singing. When the Sabbath meal of spiced shredded potato, Chinese wine, peanuts and kumquats had been shared (with chopsticks), he passed on a gift from Parisian friends to Ms. Guo for the Zhao family: a ceremonial knife from the Sydney Jewish Museum gift shop.

The day before, Mr. Shi had led me down Yiyuanhou Lane, a hutong, or alley, where his Jewish grandfather used to live, past half-demolished houses and plots full of felled bricks. Last October, residents there, as in many places in China, were told to move out, as the old neighborhood had been scheduled for redevelopment.

Mr. Shi’s mini-museum to Kaifeng Jews on Yiyuanhou Lane is a one-room collection of photographs of visits by Westerners, reproductions of historical documents used as evidence of Kaifeng’s Jewish past, and a few donated objects, including a menorah, under glass. He wasn’t sure where to put the museum now that it had to move.

“Next year,” Shi Lei said with a disapproving click of the tongue, “this hutong will disappear from the map.”

IF YOU GO:

The closest airport to Kaifeng is in Zhengzhou, reached from major Chinese cities. Shuttles from Zhengzhou Xinzheng International Airport to downtown Kaifeng take one and a half hours.

You can book a two-day detour to Kaifeng through Ctrip (866-992-8747; ctrip.com), which also suggests hotels.

Xu Xin’s authoritative book “The Jews of Kaifeng, China: History, Culture, and Religion” (Ktav, 2003) is worth reading.

To explore Jewish Kaifeng, you will need a guide. Shi Lei (jewishchinatours.com) is licensed, charming and experienced. Guo Yan (yisrael-kaifeng@hotmail.com; 86-387-115-2704) has built a mini-museum of her own and is happy to take you to a Sabbath gathering. At Passover, you may find yourself sharing food with a group of 50 or more.

In 1985, Wendy Abraham, on the board of the Sino-Judaic Institute, recorded oral histories of the last generation to remember a Jewish past in Kaifeng. (kaifengtours.org)