Tom Gross Mideast Media Analysis

Kibbutz where Jerry Seinfeld picked bananas, finally gives up on communism

February 27, 2007

* Seinfeld, who volunteered in 1971: “I didn’t like the kibbutz. Nice Jewish boys from Long Island don’t like to get up at six in the morning to pick bananas.”

* Film star Sigourney Weaver: “On the kibbutz, I dreamt we’d all be working out in the fields like pioneers, singing away. Not at all. We were stuck in the kitchen. I operated a potato-peeling machine.”

* Bob Hoskins during the 1967 Six-Day War: “I was very good at ploughing. I loved it – and the birds [girls] were amazing. I was happy being a kibbutznik but they said to me ‘You gotta join the army’ and I said ‘But I’m not Jewish’, and they said ‘It don’t matter’, so I left.”

Plus: Stressed-out Israeli bus passengers learn yoga during morning commute

 

CONTENTS

1. New on MySpace: The State of Israel
2. Wikipedia removes anti-Semitic posting
3. For first time, Christian Aid notes Israelis suffered too
4. Sharon celebrates 79th birthday in deep coma
5. From today, Israel to get acting Druze as president
6. “West Bank Story,” a musical set in conflict, wins Oscar
7. Kuwaiti newspaper: Three Gulf states agree to Israeli flights en route to hit Iran
8. The “yoga bus” takes off from Tel Aviv
9. “Titanic” director Cameron claims to have found Jesus’ Coffin
10. The remarkable story of a Moroccan Muslim in Tel Aviv
11. “I came from the Great Mother of Communism and she only lasted 70 years. We made it to nearly a hundred”
12. Israel should not be the target of “civil society initiatives”
13. “Stressed-out bus passengers learn yoga during morning commute in Israel” (AP, Feb. 20, 2007)
14. “A Moroccan in Israel” (Yediot Ahronot, Feb. 21, 2007)
15. “After nearly a century, Israel’s first kibbutz calls time on communism” (London Times, Feb. 24, 2007)
16. “Manipulating ‘civil society’” (Jerusalem Post, Feb. 20, 2007)



[Note by Tom Gross]

This dispatch concerns developments in and about Israel. Some are political; others are of a more human interest nature.

NEW ON MYSPACE: THE STATE OF ISRAEL

A “space” for the State of Israel has opened on the MySpace web site, in an effort by the Israeli government to bring “normal” Israel to young people around the world. MySpace, which was purchased over a year ago by media magnate Rupert Murdoch for $500 million, has 154 million registered members with 300,000 new members joining daily.

Describing herself as a 58-year-old female whose zodiac sign is Taurus, the address for Israel is www.myspace.com/state_of_israel. Among the first to join the “friend list” were fan clubs of actors George Clooney, Eddie Murphy, Cameron Diaz, Natalie Portman (who is Israeli-born) and Leonardo DiCaprio (who has an Israeli girlfriend), pop star Amy Winehouse, and footballer (soccer player) David Beckham, who has said he is “very proud of having a Jewish grandfather.”

The Israeli “space” includes links to clips like “Cool Facts about Israel,” “Scenes from Tel Aviv,” and “Who is Israeli?” An Internet television channel intended for Christian viewers is to be launched shortly.

Israel’s My Space will be monitored daily to make sure any anti-Israeli material posted there is removed.

* For more on Rupert Murdoch, see Hollywood stars blast Nasrallah, but Spielberg, Streisand and others remain silent (Aug. 20, 2006), where it was reported that Murdoch initiated a strongly-worded advertisement in The Los Angeles Times last summer condemning Hizbullah and Hamas terror attacks on Israeli civilians signed by 84 high-profile Hollywood stars, directors and studio heads.

* For more on David Beckham, see “Mazal tov Beckham, you’re Jewish” (& World’s oldest living married couple) (Aug. 8, 2005), where it was noted that when the English national soccer team played in Poland, at Beckham’s insistence most of the English national team visited the Auschwitz museum the day before the match.

* For more on Natalie Portman, see the second article in the dispatch Dr Ruth and “Star Wars” Queen stand up for Israel (July 1, 2002).

WIKIPEDIA REMOVES ANTI-SEMITIC POSTING

Wikipedia, the popular online “people’s encyclopedia” has removed a posting which stated that “the bones of Palestinian children” were one of the five components Jews needed to make unleavened bread for Passover. A spokesman for Wikipedia said the site would be vigilantly monitored in order to remove other anti-Semitic and hate material.

FOR FIRST TIME, CHRISTIAN AID NOTES ISRAELIS SUFFERED TOO

The major British-based charity Christian Aid has for the first time included an Israeli victim of a terror attack in its promotional material. Christian Aid’s new campaign, “A Better World is Possible,” includes a quote from Ayelet Shahak, whose young daughter was murdered in a Yasser Arafat-inspired suicide attack in Tel Aviv in 1996. Christian Aid has on countless occasions highlighted Palestinian victims.

The charity is thought to be responding to harsh criticism following recent anti-Semitic remarks about British Jews by its trustee, politician Baroness Jenny Tonge. (Tonge has since been forced to resign as a Christian Aid trustee. She was promoted to the British House of Lords by her Liberal Party leader following her initial remarks in 2004 defending the suicide bombing of Israelis.)

Christian Aid has itself been accused of anti-Semitism in the past, for example for its campaign concerning international “trade justice” which appeared to blame Jews for this phenomenon.

Some Anglicans had been so upset with Christian Aid’s previously vicious views on Israel that they set up a website titled “Christian Hate?”

* For more on Jenny Tonge, see For and against: the British MP who would be a suicide bomber (Jan. 26, 2004).

* For more on Christian Aid, see the note in the dispatch YWCA says Israel is “just like Hitler” (Feb. 25, 2005).

SHARON CELEBRATES 79TH BIRTHDAY IN DEEP COMA

Former Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon turned 79 years old yesterday, remaining deep in a coma more than 13 months after his devastating second stroke. There was no celebration in his closely-guarded room at Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer hospital near Tel Aviv. A hospital spokesman said his condition was “unchanged.”

For more on Sharon, see my article “Ariel Sharon, ‘A colossus of our time’”.

FROM TODAY, ISRAEL TO GET ACTING DRUZE AS PRESIDENT

Israel will appoint Majali Wahabe its first acting Druze president today, to replace acting president Dalia Itzik who leaves for a week-long visit to the U.S. Wahabe, from the ruling Kadima party, will also serve as Acting Knesset Speaker during Itzik’s absence.

Under Israeli law, the Knesset speaker becomes acting president, if the incumbent is absent. Itzik took up the post in late January after Moshe Katsav took leave of absence following the Israeli attorney-general’s recommendation to indict him on sex crime charges.

The Druze, a breakaway sect from Islam, are found mainly in Lebanon, Syria, Israel and Jordan. Most Druze in Israel are loyal to the state.

“WEST BANK STORY,” A MUSICAL SET IN CONFLICT, WINS OSCAR

West Bank Story, a musical satire about dueling Arab and Israeli falafel stands on the West Bank took home an Oscar on Sunday for Best Live Action Short Film at the 79th Annual Academy Awards. American filmmaker Ari Sandel spoofed the Hollywood classic West Side Story with a plot involving tensions between the owners of Palestinian humus and Israeli falafel stands competing side by side, while David, an Israeli soldier, falls in love with Fatima, the daughter of the humus-stand owning family.

Sandel, 32, the film’s director and co-writer, is active in several political organizations, including Peace Now. Sandel, whose mother is American and whose father is Israeli, has stressed in interviews that he was careful to maintain balance in his film.

KUWAITI NEWSPAPER: THREE GULF STATES AGREE TO ISRAELI FLIGHTS EN ROUTE TO HIT IRAN

The Kuwaiti newspaper, Al-Siyasa, reported on Sunday that three Arab states in the Persian Gulf would be willing to allow the Israeli Air Force to enter their airspace in order to reach Iran in case of an attack on its nuclear facilities.

The report states that a diplomat from one of the Gulf States visiting Washington last weekend said Qatar, Oman and the United Arab Emirates, have told the United States that they would not object to Israel using their airspace, despite fears of an Iranian response.

The newspaper added that NATO leaders are urging Turkey to open its airspace for an attack on Iran. According to a British diplomat who spoke to an Al-Siyasa correspondent, Turkey will not repeat the mistake it made in 2003, when it refused to open its airspace to U.S. Air Force overflights en route to attacking Iraq.

On Saturday the (London) Daily Telegraph reported that Israel is negotiating with the U.S. over permission for an “air corridor” over Iraq, should an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities become necessary.

Ephraim Sneh, Israel’s Deputy Defense Minister, denied the claim. “This is baseless information. Maybe people like to divert (attention from) the need for immediate economic sanctions (with) stories about imminent Israeli action, which is not on the agenda,” he said.

Were the report true, this would not mark the first time IAF planes passed through Iraqi airspace. On June 17, 1981 an IAF air strike demolished the Osirak nuclear reactor being constructed under Saddam Hussein’s regime.

THE “YOGA BUS” TAKES OFF FROM TEL AVIV

The first article attached below, from AP, reports that “Stressed-out commuters got a peaceful surprise as they boarded an Israeli bus on Tuesday: a yoga instructor with a microphone coaching them how to breathe correctly.”

The yoga bus, which has run every Tuesday for three weeks in Tel Aviv, has been a success: “Most of the passengers on the bus participated, and many said they felt relaxed and more ready for work.”

“Because of our history of terror on buses,” the instructor said, “it’s very important to do yoga to relax and to show everyone that life is stronger than the fear.”

“TITANIC” DIRECTOR CAMERON CLAIMS TO HAVE FOUND JESUS’ COFFIN

Academy Award-winning director James Cameron of “Titanic” fame claims to have discovered the “Lost Tomb of Jesus” and his family. According to Cameron’s new documentary, to be broadcast next week on the Discovery TV Channel, construction for a new industrial park in the Talpiot neighborhood in southern Jerusalem in 1980 revealed a 2,000-year-old cave in which 10 stone coffins were discovered.

In the documentary, Cameron cites as proof transcriptions of the names on the coffins as those of Jesus and his family – including Mary Magdalene and their supposed son Judah. The 90-minute film is scheduled to air on the Discovery Channel in the U.S. as well as channels in the U.K., Israel and Canada.

The film also suggests that the so-called “James, Brother of Jesus” ossuary, which surfaced in 2002 in the collection of Israeli antiquities collector Oded Golan, may also have come from the tomb. The “James” ossuary made world headlines, but has been branded a forgery by the Israel Antiquities Authority though it still has many defenders.

Prof. Amos Kloner, the Jerusalem District archeologist who oversaw work at the tomb when it was uncovered in 1980, said the claims made in Cameron’s documentary were “impossible” and “nonsense”.

THE REMARKABLE STORY OF A MOROCCAN MUSLIM IN TEL AVIV

The second article below, from Yediot Ahronot, tells the story of Fayce (not his real name), a Muslim Moroccan from a poor neighborhood of Casablanca, who arrived in Israel in 1997 on a student visa, to study at Tel Aviv University.

His unusual story has been turned into a book in French, which he authored. Fayce, who is now an employee for a Tel Aviv hi-tech company says “I feel completely Tel Avivian... Tel Aviv and Casablanca are two sides of one large Mediterranean culture, and I have both of them in me. I’m neither here nor there,” he adds.

He has fallen out with Israeli Arabs after defending Israel in political arguments, and come close to being a victim of a Palestinian suicide bomb attack on the Tel Aviv Dolphinarium club, which killed 21 Israelis, mostly teenagers. He met his girlfriend while she was serving as an IDF soldier, and fell in love for the first time in Israel.

Whilst he was studying at Tel Aviv University, Fayce encountered Israeli Arab students who found it difficult to understand what he was doing in Israel. “One of them asked me, ‘why did you choose to study here? Why not go to Egypt?’ I replied: ‘Why should I go to Egypt, the education here is much better.’ He was very insulted, and called me a ‘traitor.’ I asked him who I was betraying, and he said, ‘us’.”

“I told him, ‘let me say something that you don’t know. You are the only Arabs in the world who know what democracy is. There is no other place that can you criticize so openly like this. If you did it in Morocco, you’d find yourself in jail. If you don’t like it here, why don’t you go study in Egypt?’”

He added: “Before I came to Israel, I saw the Arab TV coverage. In the Arab world, they are taught to think that it’s all armed Israelis against rock throwing Palestinians. Of course, it’s not like that at all,” he said.

Fayce’s book has an introduction by Shimon Peres.

“I CAME FROM THE GREAT MOTHER OF COMMUNISM AND SHE ONLY LASTED 70 YEARS. WE MADE IT TO NEARLY A HUNDRED”

Degania, Israel’s first kibbutz, has called time on communism and has voted to privatize itself.

According to the Times of London (third article below), “The kibbutz movement has been in crisis for more than a decade but news that its pioneer is ushering in its own version of perestroika has shaken Israel. Degania has been overrun by television news crews seeking to document the passing of a way of life that the vast majority of Israelis never experienced but which, nevertheless served to define their identity.”

Degania was founded in 1910 when ten men and two women rode on horseback across the River Jordan and established a camp at Umm Juni on land purchased by the Jewish National Fund.

Eliezer Gal, aged 82, who served in the Red Army as a platoon tank commander at the siege of Leningrad, and escaped to West Berlin after being marked down by Stalin for the labor camps, said: “I’m only surprised that it survived for so long. I came from the Great Mother of Communism and she only lasted 70 years. We made it to nearly a hundred.”

ISRAEL SHOULD NOT BE THE TARGET OF “CIVIL SOCIETY INITIATIVES”

The final article below, by Gerald Steinberg (a longtime subscriber to this list), castigates the British government because the British Embassy in Tel Aviv is funding an Israeli non-governmental organization (NGO) known as “Bimkom – Planners for Planning Rights” to research the impact of the security barrier on Palestinian villages caught in the middle, and since Bimkom is a highly political organization, the outcome, he says, is a forgone conclusion.

Steinberg writes: “In this way, the British government will receive an analysis from an Israeli group that supports London’s position against the route of the barrier. The same information could have been obtained through official government channels, (i.e., intelligence) but without the important political dimension.” (The Danish government also provided Bimkom with $200,000 for a project on “Palestinian neighborhoods.”)

Steinberg continues, “For years, European governments have used the same approach by providing funding to well-known Israeli domestic political groups, such as Peace Now, B’Tselem, and the Peres Center. The Swiss Foreign Ministry and the European Union, among others, supported the failed public relations campaign to sell the Israel public the Geneva Initiative – a track-two peace proposal led by Yossi Beilin and his Palestinian counterparts.

“And under the misleading label of ‘partners for peace,’ the EU Delegation in Tel Aviv is funding a group known as the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions, which promotes anti-Israel boycotts and divestment. It also funds Israeli-Arab groups, such as Mossawa and Adallah, which ostensibly advocate for social and economic justice for the Arabs of Israel, but have done their fair share to demonize the Jewish state.

“... How would they react in London if Israel’s embassy was to fund research on a British organization that is trying to promote ... propaganda ... on the Northern Ireland conflict, or in support of separatist movements in France (Corsica) or Spain (ETA).

“... Israel, as a vibrant democracy, does not need, and should not be the target of ‘civil society initiatives’ engineered by foreign governments, whether well-meaning or hostile. From this perspective, the example of Bimkom, the security barrier, and the British Embassy is small but highly illustrative.”

I attach four articles below.

-- Tom Gross



FULL ARTICLES

“LIFE IS STRONGER THAN THE FEAR”

Stressed-out bus passengers learn yoga during morning commute in Israel
The Associated Press
February 20, 2007

www.mytelus.com/news/article.do?pageID=cp_oddities_home&articleID=2553348

Stressed-out commuters got a peaceful surprise as they boarded an Israeli bus on Tuesday: a yoga instructor with a microphone coaching them how to breathe correctly.

The passengers stretched their hands toward the ceiling and bent their heads forward as Miri Harovi, a 21-year veteran yoga teacher, guided them through a set of exercises that can be performed while sitting down.

“I think that because of our history of terror on buses,” Harovi said, referring to past suicide attacks that have targeted crowded buses. “It’s very important to do yoga to relax and to show everyone that life is stronger than the fear.”

Harovi said the idea of for a yoga bus came to her in the middle of the night while she was sleeping. She talked to the Tel Aviv bus company and they jumped on the idea.

Most of the passengers on the bus participated, and many said they felt relaxed and more ready for work. The yoga bus has run every Tuesday for three weeks, but Harovi hopes that the program will continue and expand. She and her husband, Gilad Harovi, have worked for years to promote yoga on Israeli television and in public schools.

“We want people to try yoga and feel how good it is,” Harovi said.

 

A MOROCCAN IN ISRAEL

A Moroccan in Israel
How did a Muslim Moroccan come to live in Tel Aviv? The remarkable story of Fayce
By Yaakov Lappin
Yediot Ahronot
February 21, 2007

www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3367914,00.html

At first glance, Fayce (not his real name), looks like a normal, young Tel Aviv resident. His native sounding unaccented Hebrew – complete with all of the Israeli slang – and his mannerisms bear all the hallmarks of someone who has lived in Israel for a long time.

But Fayce is actually a Muslim Moroccan from a poor Casablanca district, who arrived in Israel in1997 on a student visa, to study at Tel Aviv University.

His remarkable story has been turned into a book in French, which he authored, and which is being published by Beni Issembert, an Israeli journalist who made aliyah from France.

Since arriving in Israel, Fayce has quickly adopted what he calls “the hutzpa here,” which he has come to admire.

He has fallen out with Israeli Arabs after defending Israel in political arguments, and come close to being a victim of a Palestinian suicide bomb attack on the Tel Aviv Dolphinarium club, which killed 21 Israelis, mostly teenagers. He met his girlfriend while she was serving as an IDF soldier, and fell in love for the first time in Israel.

Fayce has also formed a close knit group of Israeli friends. “I feel completely Tel Avivian,” he declares proudly. “Tel Aviv and Casablanca are two sides of one large Mediterranean culture, and I have both of them in me. I’m neither here nor there,” he adds.

Now, an employee for a Tel Aviv hi-tech company, two years after his student visa has run out, he is facing an uphill struggle against the Ministry of Interior to have his visa extended, so that he can pay off his student debts and leave “with my head proudly held up,” he says.

“My story began when I went to a Jewish school in Casablanca,” Fayce explains. “My mother worked for a lawyer who was the president of the Casablanca Jewish community, and she arranged for me to go to that school as it gave me a real edge and a potential to succeed in the future,” he adds.

That already marked him out as different in Morocco, Fayce says. As he grew up, Fayce became interested in medicine, but was rejected from a Paris institute. He heard about Tel Aviv University’s medical course, and decided to give it a shot.

‘Never coming back’

“When they accepted me, my mother immediately arranged my air ticket and packed all of my cloths. She knew I would not return, but she wanted me to have an opportunity to make it in life,” Fayce says. “Next thing I knew, I was flying, for the first time in my life, out of Morocco.

After a stop over in London, I landed at Ben Gurion airport in Tel Aviv.” During his first night in Israel – hungry, scared, and completely disoriented - Fayce was checked by security guards at the airport several times, as he was wearing a jacket in the summer.

After realizing he was not a terrorist, each guard told Fayce, Baruch Haba (Hebrew for: Welcome). “I thought it was a curse,” Fayce recalls. “I didn’t understand why the security guards in Israel cursed after examining me, so I cursed back in Moroccan Arabic, which they didn’t understand. They nodded me through.”

Fayce received a helping hand to manage his degree financially from the Institute for Higher Education, and also took on a job to help pay for his education.

Encountering Israeli Arabs

On Tel Aviv University’s campus, Fayce said, he encountered Israeli Arabs who found it difficult to understand what he was doing in Israel. “One of them asked me, ‘why did you choose to study here? Why not go to Egypt?’ I replied: Why should I go to Egypt, the education here is much better. He was very insulted, and called me a ‘traitor.’ I asked him who I was betraying, and he said, ‘us,’” Fayce recounted.

“I told him, ‘let me say something that you don’t know. You are the only the Arabs in the world who know what democracy is. There is no other place that can you criticize so openly like this. If you did it in Morocco, you’d find yourself in jail. If you don’t like it here, why don’t you go study in Egypt,” he added.

“Only people who live here have a right to make comments about the situation,” Fayce said, recalling how close he came to being killed in the 2001 Dolphonarium bombing. Fayce was on his way to the club when the suicide bomber attacked, and was saved because he was a few minutes late. “I saw the horrific after-effect of that,” Fayce said, moving uncomfortably.

“Before I came to Israel, I saw the Arab TV coverage. In the Arab world, they are taught to think that it’s all armed Israelis against rock throwing Palestinians. Of course, it’s not like that at all,” he said.

As he quickly learned Hebrew, Fayce became acquainted with the Sabbath in Israel. “I once asked shopkeepers why they were closing the stores early on Friday afternoons. Was there a war or something? They would say, ‘Did you fall on your head? It’s Shabbat!’ I was embarrassed, so I’d say, I know, just kidding,” Fayce recalls with a smile.

“During the first Yom Kippur I experienced, I had no idea where everyone went. The campus suddenly became empty. I was mystified,” he adds.

Backing by Shimon Peres

Fayce’s book has an introduction by Vice Premier Shimon Peres. “For him, Fayce represents the true meaning of peace – someone who goes out to look for an education, and finds it irrespective of race or religion,” Beni Issembert, the book’s publisher says. “This story is outstanding, literally, it completely stands out among stories,” he adds.

“I was attracted to the book because it represents real peace – between people – and I hope its message is absorbed in France, where there are tensions between Muslims and non-Muslims,” he says.

“Fayce’s story also has all the elements of struggles represented by immigrants, irrespective of any country,” Issembert adds.

“Israel is centrally important to me,” Fayce says. He is now planning a trip to India and Nepal with his girlfriend, “to relax a little.”

“Wherever I go from here, I’ll thrive and survive, because I made it here in Israel,” he says.

Fayce, written by Faycal G. and published by Ram Editions, will shortly be released in France.

 

(ALMOST) THE LAST BASTION OF COMMUNISM

After nearly a century, Israel’s first kibbutz calls time on communism
By David Sharrock
London Times
February 24, 2007

When Eliezer Gal arrived at Israel’s first kibbutz he had already served in the Red Army as a platoon tank commander at the siege of Leningrad, escaped to West Berlin after being marked down by Stalin for the labour camps and been turned away by the British when he arrived in Palestine aboard the Jewish refugee ship Exodus.

Mr Gal took a lowly job in the cow shed for 18 years and married Michal, a daughter of the kibbutz’s founders, raising his family in the pastoral version of Zionist communism.

Now, aged 82, he is living one final adventure, which he and the other members of Degania call Shinui (The Change). The kibbutz has just voted to privatise itself and assume the trappings of capitalism.

His verdict? “It’s a lot more comfortable. We get a lot more independence, both economically and generally.

“I have seen the other world, I was born in a different world. When I came here it was the real, pure communism. But I knew then that it couldn’t survive forever because people abused it.

“I’m only surprised that it survived for so long. I came from the Great Mother of Communism and she only lasted 70 years. We made it to nearly a hundred.”

The kibbutz movement has been in crisis for more than a decade but news that its pioneer is ushering in its own version of perestroika has shaken Israel.

Degania has been overrun by television news crews seeking to document the passing of a way of life that the vast majority of Israelis never experienced but which, nevertheless served to define their identity.

Kibbutznik Tzali Kuperstein, a leading promoter of Shinui, said: “Israel has passed a lot of broken milestones in recent times, with corruption in high places, resignation from the armed forces chief and investigations of our top politicians.

“We found ourselves in a different way of life. We have to adjust, and the way we are going means that we will keep the kibbutz movement alive.”

This is a view shared by Daniel Ben-Simon, a veteran commentator for Ha’aretz newspaper. “In order to understand Israel you have to go to Degania because it all started there,” he said.

“Israelis have a love-hate relationship with it because the kibbutzim were the country’s security shield for so many years and their members were the brightest and the best. They ran the elite military units. All the first political leaders came from there. They were so few but so influential.

“When the poor, new immigrants began arriving, the kibbutzniks became objects of hatred, and when the movement began to collapse there was not much sympathy. But Degania is like a first child: when it became vulnerable like the rest of us we could finally afford to have some sympathy. It is a symbol of a simpler time, of what Israel once was.”

Degania’s members insist that they are still proud socialists. “As silly as it may sound we remain one big family,” said Ze’ev Bar-Gal, Mr Gal’s 43-year-old son-in-law, whose monthly income has doubled as the kibbutz’s computer services manager.

“What used to bother many of us was that some members were putting a lot of money into the pot and there were others giving nothing and still receiving more than the big contributors,” he said.

Degania was founded in 1910 when ten men and two women rode on horseback across the River Jordan and established a camp at Umm Juni on land purchased by the Jewish National Fund.

The pioneers built a defensive quadrangle of work buildings from locally quarried basalt. At the time they wrote: “We came to establish an independent settlement of Hebrew labourers, on national land, a collective settlement with neither exploiters nor exploited – a commune”.

Its 320 members paid their salaries into a communal account and received an allowance based on need.

A year ago the kibbutz quietly transferred to a trial system where members were paid according to ability and allowed to keep their earnings. In return, they paid for services and a “progressive” income tax destined to support the elderly and less well-off.

Now the Change has been confirmed as permanent by the votes of 85 per cent of the kibbutz, an improvement on the 66 per cent who gave their consent for the one-year trial.

“We have only privatised the service side, not the businesses,” explained Mr Bar-Gal. “It’s more a change of mentality than anything else and it has put social responsibility into people’s heads.”

His wife, Tamar, a third-generation kibbutznik, thinks The Change is wonderful. “I don’t feel that capitalism has invaded our lives. I think that our socialism has matured. Our new rules are extremely socialistic. When my grandparents came here they couldn’t live without the commune because it was hot, swampy and dangerous. But times change. Our socialism is definitely not dead.”

 

“A VIOLATION OF SOVEREIGNTY AND A CLEAR EXAMPLE OF NEOCOLONIALISM”

Manipulating ‘civil society’
By Gerald M Steinberg
The Jerusalem Post
February 20, 2007

www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1171894478646&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

The differences between Europe and the Israeli government over the status of the West Bank – Judea and Samaria – are well known. In London, Paris and Brussels, this area is viewed as “occupied territory,” while for Jerusalem, the area is “disputed.”

A similar debate is taking place within Israeli society, as groups with different ideologies challenge the government’s policies, including the expansion or removal of settlements and the route of the security barrier. This discussion is important, legitimate and extremely complex.

But when foreign governments team up with and provide financial support to private Israeli groups in order to oppose policies that are set by democratically elected leaders, this is a problem. It is also a violation of sovereignty, and a clear example of neocolonialism.

Nevertheless, the recent discovery that the British Embassy in Tel Aviv is funding an Israeli non-governmental organization (NGO) known as “Bimkom – Planners for Planning Rights” – is not surprising. The ostensible focus of the “research” is on the impact of the security barrier on Palestinian villages caught in the middle, and since Bimkom is a political organization, the outcome is a forgone conclusion.

In this way, the British government will receive an analysis from an Israeli group that supports London’s position against the route of the barrier. The same information could have been obtained through official government channels, (i.e., intelligence) but without the important political dimension. (The Danish government provided Bimkom with $200,000 for a project on “Palestinian neighborhoods.”)

For years, European governments have used the same approach by providing funding to well-known Israeli domestic political groups, such as Peace Now, B’Tselem, and the Peres Center. The Swiss Foreign Ministry and the European Union, among others, supported the failed public relations campaign to sell the Israel public the Geneva Initiative – a track-two peace proposal led by Yossi Beilin and his Palestinian counterparts.

And under the misleading label of “partners for peace,” the EU Delegation in Tel Aviv is funding a group known as the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions, which promotes anti-Israel boycotts and divestment. It also funds Israeli-Arab groups, such as Mossawa and Adallah, which ostensibly advocate for social and economic justice for the Arabs of Israel, but have done their fair share to demonize the Jewish state.

What is new in the case of Bimkom is the response of the Foreign Ministry, which stated: “It is interference by Britain in an internal Israeli matter. How would they react in London if our embassy was to fund research on a British organization that is trying to promote an agenda that is critical of [the government]?”

The language is a diplomatic and understated – indeed, almost English – reaction to a fundamental defect in European policy toward Israel. A more blunt response might have provided a hypothetical examples – such as an advertising campaign funded by the US government in London or Paris promoting a hard-line anti-abortion position. Or a propaganda effort on the Northern Ireland conflict, or in support of separatist movements in France (Corsica) or Spain (ETA).

Furthermore, the scale of European government funding for Israeli and Palestinian political organizations that claim to promote human rights, peace and democracy is huge, and largely hidden. The massive Euro-bureaucracy has created a complex network of funding agencies for “civil society” in the region, and no central index or reporting system exists.

Until last year, the EU office in Tel Aviv violated its own principles of transparency and kept the list of Israeli NGO beneficiaries secret, ostensibly due to threats of violence. NGO Monitor’s investigations led to a change in this instance, but funding for Palestinian NGOs is still largely covert.

The change in Israeli government policy and a willingness to confront such anti-democratic manipulation, particularly by European governments (including non-EU countries such as Norway and Switzerland), marks an important step. Going beyond the terse statement, the Israeli representatives should bring a detailed file on the funding provided for politicized NGOs to every meeting between heads of state, foreign ministers and government officials.

If Europe expects to play a more important role in regional security and diplomacy, it cannot also continue to provide funding designed to undermine the Israeli government’s positions, both internally and in the international arena.

In Europe, the amorphous entities known as “civil society organizations” and NGOs also need close scrutiny. These bodies are unelected, and their officials are not accountable.

In democratic societies, government officials who provide funds to these entities generally use this as a means to promote their own interests and objectives, without checks and balances or transparency. In closed non-democratic societies, such as Syria, Egypt and the Palestinian Authority, foreign government assistance for NGOs that promote democracy, tolerance, and human rights may have a positive impact, but only if this support is carefully monitored to prevent abuse. Europe’s failure to provide such monitoring exacerbates the damage.

Israel, as a vibrant democracy, does not need, and should not be the target of “civil society initiatives” engineered by foreign governments, whether well-meaning or hostile. From this perspective, the example of Bimkom, the security barrier, and the British Embassy is small but highly illustrative.

The time has come to end this misguided and patronizing policy.


YouTube becoming site of choice for al-Qaeda to spread propaganda

February 21, 2007

* Iraqi government: Al-Jazeera is contributing to “death and destruction”
* NBC military analyst quits citing left-wing bias
* Global newspaper circulation up sharply despite internet
* New York Times ignores Pakistani Islamic assassination

 

CONTENTS

1. Internet users transformed into news reporters
2. Newspaper circulation is growing despite internet
3. Sulzberger: NY Times focusing on transition from print to internet
4. NBC military analyst quits citing left-wing bias
5. Star BBC presenter says he has “fallen in love with Iran”
6. Iraqi government: Al-Jazeera contributing to “death and destruction”
7. YouTube: The propaganda outlet for Iraqi insurgents
8. Mohammed cartoons published for first time in England
9. Foreign correspondents: “An expensive indulgence”
10. Tel Aviv bombing prevented yesterday
11. Update: Elie Wiesel attacker apprehended
12. Update: Prince Bin Talal denies involvement in Tel Aviv hotel project
13. Update: Prof. Ariel Toaff denies “blood libels”
14. “Iraqi Government: Al-Jazeera Channel contributing to the spread of death” (Asharq Al-Awsat, Feb. 8, 2007)
15. “Demise of the Foreign Correspondent” (Washington Post, Feb. 18, 2007)



[Note by Tom Gross]

Since there are a large number of journalists on this list, I occasionally send dispatches dealing mainly with developments in the media, of which this is one.

INTERNET USERS TRANSFORMED INTO NEWS REPORTERS

As photo and video-taking mobile (cell) phones and digital movie cameras grow ubiquitous, Internet users worldwide are being recruited to become “citizen news reporters.” Two new websites, NowPublic.com and YouWitnessNews (created by Yahoo), are sites that post offerings from users including pictures, videos, commentary and opinions.

NowPublic and YouWitnessNews have formed alliances with traditional international news wire services and provide them with photos and other content. Inspiration for YouWitnessNews came as Yahoo News editors were searching for pictures in the wake of the terror attacks on London underground trains in July 2005.

As a result, participatory journalism is expected to influence traditional news operations in the future as reporters receive tips or ideas from people online or respond to news broken by people in the right places at the right times.

“If a bomb went off in Budapest and you wanted to connect with someone within a mile of the scene, we find them for you,” NowPublic’s chief executive said. “Our job is to provide an army of people who are eyes and ears that journalists can build around.”

Vancouver-based NowPublic says it now has 60,000 contributing “reporters” in more than 140 countries, and is continuing to double in size every three months.

NEWSPAPER CIRCULATION IS GROWING DESPITE INTERNET

In spite of the Internet, and contrary to widespread negative assumptions about the newspaper industry, global newspaper circulation is growing – by 2.36% in 2005, and up by 9.95% since 2001 – according to new data from the World Association of Newspapers.

New newspaper titles are also being launched at a remarkable rate. Global newspaper circulation rose in 2005 (the most recent year for which data is available), as the number of titles passed 10,000 for the first time. The total number of paid-for daily newspaper titles worldwide rose to 10,104, up 13% from 2001, when there were 8,930 titles.

450 million copies of newspapers were sold daily in 2005. Free daily newspaper circulation was also up sharply, more than doubling from 2001 to 2005, from 12m copies in 2001 to 28m in 2005.

SULZBERGER: NY TIMES FOCUSING ON TRANSITION FROM PRINT TO INTERNET

The New York Times posted losses of $570 million this month and Arthur Sulzberger, owner, chairman and publisher of what leftists believe is the most respected newspaper in the world, is a worried man.

During a casual chat with a journalist from the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz at the World Economic Forum at Davos, Switzerland, Sulzberger said, “I really don’t know whether we’ll be printing the Times in five years, and you know what? I don’t care either... The Internet is a wonderful place to be, and we’re leading there.”

The New York Times has doubled its online readership to 1.5 million a day to complement its 1.1 million subscribers for its print edition. The average age of readers of the New York Times print edition is 42. The average age of readers of its Internet edition is 37. (It still falls far short of the circulation for the Wall Street Journal and USA Today, America’s two most read daily newspapers.)

“We are curators, curators of news. People don’t click onto the New York Times to read blogs. They want reliable news that they can trust,” Sulzberger said. I’m sure that what we wrote and what we’re about to write is right.”

* In today’s New York Times there are, as usual, many examples of how its coverage is far from thorough. For example, Fox News and other media today report on the Pakistani woman minister who was murdered yesterday by a religious fanatic.

This Fox item, which came via the London Times was titled “Female Pakistani Minister Shot Dead for Refusing to Wear Veil.” It starts: “Zilla Huma Usman, the minister for social welfare in Punjab province and an ally of President Pervez Musharraf, was killed as she was about to deliver a speech to dozens of party activists, by a ‘fanatic’, who believed that she was dressed inappropriately and that women should not be involved in politics, officials said.”

But the New York Times, instead of writing about this, leads with a story about Pakistani Islamic women who occupied a library to stop an illegally built mosque from being destroyed.

* For more on Sulzberger and the New York Times, please see “All the news that’s fit to print?”.

NBC MILITARY ANALYST QUITS, CITING LEFT-WING BIAS

NBC military analyst Ken Allard has resigned from the network after 10 years there, saying he could no longer put up with the left-wing bias at NBC News.

The final straw, he said, was NBC’s failure to criticize remarks made by another of its analysts, Bill Arkin, who implied the American military was full of “mercenaries” raking in “obscene amenities”.

STAR BBC PRESENTER SAYS HE HAS “FALLEN IN LOVE WITH IRAN”

Rageh Omaar, the former star BBC presenter made famous by his coverage of the run-up to the war in Iraq, where he was nicknamed the “Scud stud,” has told The Guardian newspaper that he has now “fallen in love with Iran.”

Omaar, the former BBC world affairs correspondent, is among many western journalists who have been lured to work at the English-language Al-Jazeera International.

But in a recent program he made in a freelance capacity for the BBC, titled “Rageh Inside Iran,” he describes Iran as a “Wonderland”. Omaar told The Guardian that “it is remarkable that here is an Islamic society ruled by a theocracy where drug addiction is openly discussed, there’s rehab, there’s HIV education. You wouldn’t find that in most pro-western ‘democratic’ Arab regimes. Here is an Islamic country that is being prodded and poked and held up to scrutiny by its own people.”

When asked by The Guardian about “the more troublesome parts of Iranian society,” Omaar replied that “there is oppression, people being stoned and hanged and all that” but “none of that is in the film.”

IRAQI GOVERNMENT: AL-JAZEERA CONTRIBUTING TO “DEATH AND DESTRUCTION”

The Iraqi government has accused the Al-Jazeera satellite channel of “contributing to the spread of death and destruction” through its news coverage of the events in Iraq.

In a statement, the Iraqi cabinet said that the “Al-Jazeera channel continues to adopt a clear and blatant hostile position towards the Iraqi public, contributing to the spread of death and destruction on Iraq’s noble land through its adoption of an antagonistic project that is obviously against Iraq and its people.”

The Iraqi government believes that “Al-Jazeera channel aired programs through which it tried to spread confusion and distort the facts, in addition to diverting international public opinion away from the catastrophic crimes committed by the death squads and the rampant destruction and organized terrorism on Iraqi land.”

In response Al-Jazeera described the Iraqi cabinet’s statement as “without justification or basis” and that the Iraqi government was “searching for a scapegoat to justify its failure to achieve security and stability for the Iraqi people.” For more, see the first article attached below, from the Saudi-owned newspaper Asharq Al-Awsat.

YOUTUBE: THE PROPAGANDA OUTLET FOR IRAQI INSURGENTS

As is noted in a recent study by The Associated Press, “With the global spread of high-speed Internet connections and the relative anonymity afforded by the world’s biggest and busiest sites, extremists have found a new theater to display violence and anti-American propaganda.”

Iraqi insurgents are now using mainstream sites such as YouTube to post videos of bombings and sniper attacks against U.S. forces – shot and edited by Islamic militants and broadcast on the world’s largest video-sharing Web site.

Until recently, videos shot by terrorist groups were posted predominantly on specialist Internet forums, which often only those knowing what to look for could find. But more are turning to mainstream sites like YouTube, which draw millions of visitors around the world each day.

Mark Rasch, a former U.S. Justice Department computer crimes prosecutor, said the videos at YouTube and other sites are evidence of “a new front in the propaganda battle.” “It’s here to stay. It’s going to get worse – we are going to see real-time executions with higher production values.”

Jeremy Curtin, a U.S. State Department official responsible for monitoring Internet propaganda, said authorities were aware of the footage on sites like YouTube but had not made any real headway in tackling the problem.

YouTube – which was recently bought by Google Inc. – receives some 65,000 new clips to post each day. Users collectively watch more than 100 million videos on YouTube daily.

YouTube says it reserves the right to remove videos that users flag as unsuitable. “YouTube has clear terms and conditions which prohibit, amongst other things, hateful content,” the company said in a statement. “Our community has been highly effective in policing the site, and YouTube removes videos if our community flags them as inappropriate.”

A recent search conducted by The Associated Press, points to many problematic examples. For instance, in a video carrying the logo of the Mujahedeen Shura Council, an umbrella organization of Sunni insurgent groups including al-Qaeda in Iraq, a man stands in a deserted field beside a blue car.

Speaking in Arabic, he gives what he describes as his final testament before a suicide car bombing that he claims will target a U.S. convoy in Tal Afar, 260 miles northwest of Baghdad. Moments later, the footage shows what appears to be a checkpoint, followed by an explosion. The man shooting the film screams, “Allahu akbar. (God is great.)”

Tens of thousands of people have viewed these kind of videos since they were posted in the last three months, according to YouTube’s view counter on the site.

In another video entitled “Qanaas Baghdad Episode II,” a man purporting to be an Iraqi sniper offers tips on attacking U.S. soldiers. As music plays, a group of soldiers stand at the side of a bustling, dusty street. The sniper locks on to one of them. A second later, the soldier falls to the ground.

An example of one of these terrorist videos can be seen here.

A list of some of the other insurgent and propaganda videos from YouTube can be seen here.

MOHAMMED CARTOONS PUBLISHED FOR FIRST TIME IN ENGLAND

A cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed has appeared for the first time in a publication in England, reports the Cambridge News.

The cartoon was printed in a Cambridge University student magazine, in the Clare College’s special edition on religious satire. The 19-year-old student who printed the cartoon has since gone into hiding after threats. Asim Mumtaz, president of the Muslim Association, said: “I’m horrified and shocked. In such a seat of learning, I am horrified that things could stoop to this level.”

The cartoon was printed alongside a picture of the president of the Union of Clare Students, with the captions switched. There was also a comment suggesting one was a “violent paedophile” and the other was “a prophet of God, great leader and an example to us all”.

The college has called a rare Court of Discipline to decide how the student should be brought to account.

* For more on the Mohammed cartoons, please see this newly designed page on my website, which among other things includes the Mohammed cartoons originally featured in the Danish newspaper Jyllands Posten: “To be or not to be”.

FOREIGN CORRESPONDENTS: “AN EXPENSIVE INDULGENCE”

The second article below, from the Washington Post, examines what the writer, Pamela Constable, calls the “demise of the foreign correspondent”. Due to the rise of the Internet, some newspapers have struggled and as a result “they see foreign coverage as an indulgence they can’t afford.”

Constable argues that “newspapers can also fill an important niche between television and academe, offering an accessible way for busy people to learn about distant events and an outlet for writing that captures the essence of a time and place without polemics or pedantry. They can put events in context, explain human behavior and belief, evoke a way of life. Foreign correspondents can burrow into a society, cultivate strangers’ trust, follow meandering trails and dig beneath layers of diplomatic spin and government propaganda.”

In January, the Boston Globe, the Philadelphia Inquirer and the Baltimore Sun all announced that they were to close down their offices in Israel. This comes hot on the heels of Newsday who also recently shut its bureau in Israel. In spite of this, each and every action of Israel continues to be scrutinized by international media to a much greater extent than any other nation on the planet.

-- Tom Gross

 

TEL AVIV BOMBING PREVENTED YESTERDAY

As not reported by the international media properly today:

Israeli police yesterday discovered an eight-pound bomb in a trash can in a city close to Tel Aviv. Following a tip off from Israeli intelligence, officers raided an apartment just south of Tel Aviv where they picked up a young Palestinian. He is said to have taken them to a place where he dropped off the device, for a second person to carry to its final destination in Tel Aviv. It is understood he was working on the orders of Islamic Jihad and entered Israel through an area near Jerusalem where Israel’s security barrier has not yet been completed. Three other Palestinians were arrested in connection with the foiled plot.

There was no mention of the thwarted Tel Aviv terror attack in the Washington Post, the Independent, Daily Telegraph, and Times of London, among other newspapers I checked. The BBC only mentioned it in passing on their website after reporting on the death of a leader of Islamic Jihad.

 

UPDATES

These are updates to three of the items in Monday’s dispatch (Stanford University to show Turkish blood libel film (& Saudi Prince to build hotel in Tel Aviv)).

UPDATE: ELIE WIESEL ATTACKER APPREHENDED

Eric Hunt, the man accused of attacking the Nobel Peace Prize winner and Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel, has now been arrested in New Jersey. He will soon be transferred to San Francisco to stand trial.

UPDATE: PRINCE BIN TALAL DENIES INVOLVEMENT IN TEL AVIV HOTEL PROJECT

I was sent this Press Release from Prince Alwaleed bin Talal’s office:

RIYADH, 20 February 2007 - Prince Alwaleed bin Talal’s office at Kingdom Holding Company termed a recent report in Yediot Ahronot, an Israeli newspaper, as “false and baseless.” In a clarification issued by the office yesterday, the office said: “We at KHC clarify that the information in a recent article in the Israeli newspaper Yediot Ahronot about a hotel project in Tel Aviv published on Feb. 15 is false and baseless.

We would like to thank the local, regional and international media for their news coverage about KHC and Prince Alwaleed bin Talal. However, we at KHC urge writers to verify information related to significant/important news before publishing, to maintain the integrity and credibility of their reputable publication. Media queries can be sent to fax: +966 1 211 1205 e-mail: mfn@kingdom.net.

With this, KHC confirms its commitment to support the Middle East peace process and will base its investment strategies in accordance with the international community’s ambition to achieve long lasting peace in the region.”

UPDATE: PROF. ARIEL TOAFF DENIES “BLOOD LIBELS”

Prof. Ariel Toaff, of Bar-Ilan University, near Tel Aviv, has asked his Italian publisher to halt distribution of his book (“Easter of Blood: European Jews and ritual homicides”) so that “clarifications” can be inserted. Prof. Toaff says his research and writings, which he claimed had been misinterpreted, were not in any way meant to be used as a justification for blood libel.

In a statement he added: “I feel deeply responsible for the recent events which have transpired, and in order to express my profound regret regarding the misrepresentations that were attributed to me and which hurt the Jewish people, I have decided to donate all the funds forthcoming from the sale of this publication to further the activities of the Anti-Defamation League.

“I will never allow any Jew-hater to use me or my research as an instrument for fanning the flames, once again, of the hatred that led to the murder of millions of Jews... I have decided to ask my publisher to stop the book’s distribution, so that I can insert the requisite clarifications as speedily as possible. I am taking these steps in order to prevent the further misuse of my book as anti-Semitic propaganda.”

Tom Gross adds: Newspapers around the world reported leading Italian newspaper Corriere Della Sera’s claims that “a Jewish academic has shocked Italy by stating that Jews murdered Christians during the Middle Ages so that their blood could be used in ritualistic ceremonies.” Toaff has been widely criticized by many leading figures, including the former chief rabbi of Rome.

Despite Toaff’s apology, it seems the damage has already been done. For example, the (London) Daily Telegraph reported: “In the book, Prof Toaff describes the mutilation and crucification of a two-year-old boy to recreate Christ’s execution at Pesach, the Jewish Easter. The festival marks the fleeing of the Jews from Egypt and Prof Toaff says Christian blood was used for ‘magic and therapeutic practices.’ In some cases the blood was mixed with dough to make the azzimo, unleavened bread, eaten at Pesach.”

Other historians have dismissed Prof. Toaff’s claims as “complete lies”. One said: “The only blood split in these stories was that of many innocent Jews killed for unjust accusations.”



FULL ARTICLES

AL-JAZEERA CONTRIBUTING TO “DEATH AND DESTRUCTION”

Iraqi Government: Al-Jazeera Channel contributing to the spread of death
Asharq Al-Awsat
February 8, 2007

The Iraqi government has accused Al Jazeera satellite channel of “contributing to the spread of death and destruction” through its news coverage of the events in Iraq. This comes two years following the closure of the channel’s office in Baghdad.

In a statement, the Iraqi cabinet said that, “Al Jazeera channel continues to adopt a clear and blatant hostile position towards the Iraqi public, contributing to the spread of death and destruction on Iraq’s noble land through its adoption of an antagonistic project that is obviously against Iraq and its people.

Al Jazeera described the Iraqi cabinet’s statement as “without justification or basis.”

Ahmed al Sheikh, the editor-in-chief of Al-Jazeera television said, “What have we done… Nothing.” He sees that, “the Iraqi government is searching for a scapegoat to justify its failure to achieve security and stability for the Iraqi people,” according to Reuters news agency. The Iraqi government had banned Al-Jazeera channel from operating in Iraq two years ago despite the fact that the English service of the channel has an office in Baghdad and continues to broadcast from the autonomous region of Kurdistan in northern Iraq.

The Iraqi government believes that, “Al Jazeera channel aired programs through which it tried to spread confusion and distort the facts, in addition to diverting international public opinion away from the catastrophic crimes committed by the death squads and the rampant destruction and organized terrorism on Iraqi land.” The ministerial statement added, “we invite the representatives of the Iraqi people in the House of Representatives to take a firm and clear stand against the channel, and to use legal ways to persecute and deter it away from its approach that is hostile to the aspirations and expectations of Iraq’s people and its national government.”

The Iraqi government did offer an explanation for this new criticism; however an official from the ruling Shiaa coalition said that a talk show, which was broadcast the day before last, criticized the government and the Shiaa parties.

An Iraqi media official had issued a request to the parliament to take a ‘clear and decisive’ stance towards the Qatari satellite channel, accusing Al-Jazeera of airing “discrimination and outright animosity, also propagating confusion and distorting the facts.”

According to the head of the national media center of the cabinet’s secretariat, “Al-Jazeera adopts a blatantly antagonistic position against Iraq’s people and is a tool for spreading discord among the sons of one nation. It is a means of [spreading] killing, death and destruction,” as related by Agence France-Press (AFP).

 

“KNOWING ABOUT THE WORLD IS NOT A LUXURY; IT IS AN URGENT NECESSITY”

Demise of the Foreign Correspondent
By Pamela Constable
The Washington Post
February 18, 2007

www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/16/AR2007021601713.html

When I think back on the most momentous events of my professional life, they include scenes of both devastation and deliverance. The boulevards of Manila, flooded with peaceful demonstrators chanting for Philippine dictator Ferdinand Marcos to abandon power. The slums of Port-au-Prince, Haiti, where a joyful, gyrating mob of slum-dwellers is celebrating the election of populist priest Jean-Bertrand Aristide as president. The highlands of Guatemala or Peru, where grave sites conceal the victims of atrocity.

If the Boston Globe had not sent me abroad as a foreign correspondent in 1983, and allowed me to spend a decade in Latin America and other regions of the world, I would never have been able to witness these historic changes – and bring them alive to readers back home. Even then, the Globe was one of only a handful of American newspapers willing to invest in the luxury of its own foreign staff, and I was keenly aware of how privileged I was to do all this while drawing a steady paycheck.

Today, Americans’ need to understand the struggles of distant peoples is greater than ever. Our troops are fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, countries that we did not know enough about when we invaded them and that we are still trying to fathom. We have been victimized by foreign terrorists, yet we still cannot imagine why anyone would hate us. Our economy is intimately linked to global markets, our population is nearly 20 percent foreign-born, and our lives are directly affected by borderless scourges such as global warming and AIDS. Knowing about the world is not a luxury; it is an urgent necessity.

But instead of stepping up coverage of international affairs, American newspapers and television networks are steadily cutting back. The Globe, which stunned the journalism world last month by announcing that it would shut down its last three foreign bureaus, is the most recent example.

Between 2002 and 2006, the number of foreign-based newspaper correspondents shrank from 188 to 141 (excluding the Wall Street Journal, which publishes Asian and European editions). The Baltimore Sun, which had correspondents from Mexico to Beijing when I went to work there in 1978, now has none. Newsday, which once had half a dozen foreign bureaus, is about to shut down its last one, in Pakistan. Only four U.S. papers – the Journal, the Los Angeles Times, the New York Times and The Washington Post – still keep a stable of foreign correspondents.

It takes a lot of money to maintain an office in a foreign capital. A typical newspaper bureau overseas costs at least $250,000 a year, according to foreign editors, and a large, security-conscious news operation in a city such as Baghdad can hemorrhage four times that.

But today many readers are switching to other information sources – including Web sites and even blogs – that have left newspapers struggling to survive. Many family-owned papers have been acquired by corporations that see foreign coverage as an indulgence they can’t afford.

In an effort to cut costs, newspapers are replacing bureaus – which require staffs and cars and family housing – with mobile, trouble-shooting individual correspondents. The erstwhile bureau chief in New Delhi or Cairo, chatting with diplomats over rum punches on the veranda, is now an eager kid with a laptop and an Arabic phrase book in her backpack. Freelancers can help cover more remote or incremental stories, and newswire agencies can cover breaking news in global hot spots – but neither is enough.

Television, meanwhile, continues to bring us instant images of the latest Baghdad market bombing or flimsy refugee shacks in Sudan’s Darfur region, but its coverage of the world is increasingly selective as well as superficial.

Although more than 80 percent of the public obtains most of its foreign and national news from TV, the major networks are also closing down foreign bureaus, concentrating their resources on a few big stories such as Iraq.

In the 1980s, American TV networks each maintained about 15 foreign bureaus; today they have six or fewer. ABC has shut down its offices in Moscow, Paris and Tokyo; NBC closed bureaus in Beijing, Cairo and Johannesburg. Aside from a one-person ABC bureau in Nairobi, there are no network bureaus left at all in Africa, India or South America – regions that are home to more than 2 billion people.

In a speech at Columbia University last week, veteran TV news anchor Walter Cronkite warned that pressure by media companies to generate increasing profits is threatening our nation’s values and freedom by leaving people less informed. In today’s complicated world, “the need for high-quality reporting is greater than ever,” he said. “It’s not just the journalist’s job at risk here. It’s American democracy.”

Even at their best, newspapers are also a limited medium. I have always been acutely aware that no matter how deeply I burrowed into a society or how many people I interviewed, I was only peeling back the most superficial layers of complex, murky worlds in which people routinely lied, every incident had a contradictory version, and no 1,500-word article could possibly do justice to the truth.

Yet newspapers can also fill an important niche between television and academe, offering an accessible way for busy people to learn about distant events and an outlet for writing that captures the essence of a time and place without polemics or pedantry. They can put events in context, explain human behavior and belief, evoke a way of life. Foreign correspondents can burrow into a society, cultivate strangers’ trust, follow meandering trails and dig beneath layers of diplomatic spin and government propaganda.

As a young reporter, I devoured the work of famous foreign correspondents and yearned to follow in their footsteps as they chronicled human travails and endeavors: the flight into exile, the search for work, the upheaval of war, the pilgrimage of faith. Joe Lelyveld, accompanying black workers on their daily bus commute into a South African city. Michael Herr, following a psychedelic trail of tears through the jungles of Vietnam. Freya Stark in the 1930s, following the great frankincense road: “On its stream of padding feet the riches of Asia travelled; along its slow continuous thread the Arabian empires rose and fell.” Some may call this highbrow tourism, but I agree with the late Polish correspondent Ryszard Kapuscinski: There is something more valuable and more enduring than facts.

The best work that I produced over the years, and that resonated most with readers, were the stories that took the time and space to portray an alien world in detail. The road trip across Afghanistan during Taliban rule, where veiled women told me they finally felt safe from marauding militias. The train ride across India with a family to baptize their son in the Ganges, which they fervently believed would protect him for life. The portrait of a poor Afghan village where tiny children begged me not to destroy the family’s opium poppy crop. The trial of the Pakistani man who carved up his wife’s face in a jealous rage, and then told me with great satisfaction that he had avenged his family honor.

Although many people have a glamorous image of foreign correspondents, theirs is a lonely, gritty and often dangerous way of life. During my years on the road, I have landed in capitals where I knew no one, all hell was breaking loose and I had 10 hours until deadline. I have lain in sweltering hotel rooms staring at spiders, outrun drunken soldiers waving pistols, interviewed hysterical teenagers who vowed to murder all Americans, inhaled tear gas with angry mobs, gone weeks without a hot meal or shower.

I never regretted a minute of it – and I never thought I’d be a member of a dying breed. I know that change is inevitable, that fewer people are buying our products and that the news business must adapt or sink. But putting aside my nostalgia for literary nomadism, I am convinced that cutting back on first-hand reporting from abroad and substituting cheaper, simpler forms of overseas news delivery is a false economy and a grave mistake.

Don’t we learn more about Islam from Anthony Shadid’s wide-ranging Post interviews with thoughtful Muslims in Egypt and Turkey than from images of the latest bombing in Baghdad? Don’t we identify more with Sharon LaFraniere’s New York Times portraits of village customs in Malawi and Mozambique than with dry reports about the grim toll of AIDS across Africa? If newspapers stop covering the world, I fear we will end up with a microscopic elite reading Foreign Affairs and a numbed nation watching terrorist bombings flash briefly among a barrage of commentary, crawls and celebrity gossip.

Even amid the broader wave of newspaper cutbacks, the announcement that the Globe was shutting down its foreign bureaus hit a special nerve among newspaper journalists. Somehow it seemed a watershed in the inexorable surrender of an honorable craft to the bottom line.

Many of us knew and admired Elizabeth Neuffer, a Globe correspondent who spent several years searching for mass killers in Rwanda and Bosnia, and later published a riveting book about her findings. Elizabeth, who died in a car accident in Iraq in 2003, believed in following the truth to its source, and the paper she worked for gave her the space and resources to do so. Now I fear we are witnessing the demise of the kind of journalism that permitted such quests at all.

Stanford University to show Turkish blood libel film (& Saudi Prince to build hotel in Tel Aviv)

February 19, 2007

* Suspect named in Elie Wiesel attack
* Eyal Sivan loses “Jewish anti-Semite” case
* New “Jews for Boycott of Israel Goods” group set up in Britain
* Rabbi Michael Lerner: American government “may have been behind 9/11 attacks”

 

CONTENTS

1. A “Jewish anti-Semite”
2. “I’m being crucified!”
3. A delusional American Rabbi
4. Stanford University to show Turkish blood libel film
5. Qaradawi to attend conference as “no Israelis will be present”
6. Anti-Israel protestors attempt to block flowers for Valentine’s Day
7. Knesset event honoring Druze and Circassian communities
8. Israeli Professor rebukes Irish scholars on academic boycott
9. Doron Almog’s son passes away
10. Tel Aviv markets reach record high
11. Saudi Prince to build hotel in Tel Aviv
12. Syrian group claims they are holding missing Israeli soldier Guy Hever
13. Israel successfully test fires Arrow missile
14. Suspect named in Elie Wiesel attack
15. Zundel gets maximum term for Holocaust denial; Papon dies
16. “The Arabs know the truth, but this doesn’t change a thing”
17. “Truth and punishment” (Yediot Ahronot, Feb. 12, 2007)
18. “Why walls are going up all over the world?” (Arab News, Feb. 18, 2007)



[Note by Tom Gross]

A “JEWISH ANTI-SEMITE”

The first part of this dispatch is a follow-up to last week’s “Israeli Apartheid week” dispatch. That dispatch was widely quoted around the world, both in newspapers (for example, in this editorial in the Jerusalem Post) and on weblogs (for example, that of Times of London columnist Stephen Pollard and that of Times cultural critic Clive Davis.) I would also like to thank former (London) Daily Telegraph editor, Charles Moore, for his kind reference to this email list and website in this week’s Spectator magazine.

Readers have also pointed out further remarks made by some of the anti-Israeli Israeli academics cited in last week’s dispatch. Yitzhak Laor, the Israeli journalist and poet speaking at “Israeli Apartheid Week,” last year branded the Israeli army “terrorists” in an article for The London Review of Books (another publication edited and published by an anti-Israeli Jew). At the same time Laor referred to Arab terrorists as “partisans”.

Paris-based Israeli filmmaker Eyal Sivan (also referred to in last week’s dispatch) has lost a court case in France. He had sued leading French intellectual Alain Finkielkraut who accused Sivan of being a “Jewish anti-Semite”. The court dismissed Sivan’s case against Finkielkraut.

“I’M BEING CRUCIFIED!”

Meanwhile, Bar-Ilan University (near Tel Aviv) has issued an official statement distancing itself from its Professor Ariel Toaff’s “research” on blood libels.

While Bar-Ilan University “champions freedom of academic and scientific expression as the basis for its research activity,” it said, we “express our strongest reservations regarding Prof. Toaff’s latest research regarding blood libels against European Jews in the Middle Ages. Bar-Ilan University – its officers and researchers – have condemned, and condemn, any attempt to justify the awful blood libels against Jews.”

“As of yet, there has been no contact with Prof. Toaff, who is traveling abroad. Immediately upon his return to the country in the coming days, Bar-Ilan University President Prof. Moshe Kaveh will summon Prof. Toaff and ask from him explanations regarding his research.”

In a new book published in Italy, Toaff has bizarrely claimed that medieval anti-Semitic blood libels were true. Toaff has been widely criticized by European Jewish leaders, and some have accused Toaff of promoting anti-Semitism. In response, Toaff told Ha’aretz: “I will not give up my devotion to academic freedom even if the world crucifies me.”

A DELUSIONAL AMERICAN RABBI

It is not just academics who have started to express empathy with conspiracy theorists and hatemongerers. Some delusional left-wing rabbis have too. The weekly Forward newspaper reports that Rabbi Michael Lerner, the American activist and editor of Tikkun magazine, has published an essay saying he is open to the possibility that the American government may have been behind the September 11 terrorist attacks.

“I would not be surprised to learn that some branch of our government conspired either actively to promote or passively to allow the attack on 9/11,” Lerner has written in an essay published in the new book, “9/11 and American Empire: Christians, Jews, and Muslims Speak Out.”

“I am agnostic on the question of what happened on 9/11,” the Berkeley, California-based rabbi wrote in his essay for the book, which includes articles by other more openly conspiracy-mongering contributors.

Lerner, the founder of the newly formed Network of Spiritual Progressives, gained national attention in the U.S. in the 1990s after a meeting with then-first lady Hillary Clinton, during which they discussed his ideas about the need for a new “politics of meaning.” Since then, he has emerged as a leader of efforts to reconcile left-wing politics and religious belief, calling for a “Spiritual Covenant” to transform America.

The book in which Lerner’s essay appears is billed as having been “inspired by” David Ray Griffin’s “The New Pearl Harbor,” a seminal text of the so-called “9/11 Truth” movement.

Lerner told the Forward that he has good reason to be suspicious of the government. “I’ve had a lot of personal experience of government lying and doing things that are very destructive and pretending that they weren’t doing it.” Lerner added that he thought the American government may have had some hand in 9/11, not the Israeli one.

STANFORD UNIVERSITY TO SHOW TURKISH BLOOD LIBEL FILM

Stanford University, also in California, is to show the virulently anti-Semitic and anti-American Turkish film, Valley of the Wolves.

Valley of the Wolves, made a year ago, is the most expensive movie ever made in Turkey. In the film, American soldiers in Iraq crash a wedding and pump a little boy full of lead in front of his mother. They kill dozens of innocent people with random machine gun-fire, shoot the groom in the head, and drag those left alive to prison, where a Jewish doctor cuts out their organs, and sells them to rich clients in New York, London and Tel Aviv.

It has been billed at Stanford as “the action movie you were not meant to see” and its showing “a service to the Stanford academic community at large.”

Stanford University students are urged “to see this important film for yourself. Non-stop screen action, intellectual stimulation, and real political controversy in one program! This is an event not to be missed.” For more see here.

* For more information on Valley of the Wolves, see my article “To be or not to be”.

* For more on Stanford University, see the first note in the dispatch David Irving: Auschwitz “was a tourist attraction” (& British Muslims scrap Holocaust Day) (Jan. 31, 2007).

QARADAWI TO ATTEND CONFERENCE AS “NO ISRAELIS WILL BE PRESENT”

Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the nearest thing Sunni Islam has to a pope, agreed to participate in the ongoing U.S.-Islamic World Forum currently taking place in Doha on 18-20 February, having first clarified that no Israelis will attend. This forum is a joint project of the Qatari Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Saban Center at Brookings.

On his website (www.qaradawi.net) Qaradawi announced in Arabic that he would “participate in the America Forum [The U.S.-Islamic World forum], after it was verified that no Israelis will be present.” His announcement can be read here.

It is unclear whether Haim Saban, who funds the Saban Center and is an Israeli, will be attending. The forum aims to explore over three days, ways to improve U.S.-Islamic relations.

The website Qaradawi.net conveys Qaradawi’s Islamic views. The site is one of the most popular Islamic websites on the net. Qaradawi is a preacher best known for his al-Jazeera program “ash-Shariah wal Hayat” (“Shariah and life”) and Islam Online a website he helped found in 1997. His fatwas, or religious edicts on matters personal or political, are widely considered definitive among Sunnis. Among his most infamous fatwas was one encouraging Palestinians to carry out suicide bombings.

Qaradawi spoke yesterday, at the opening of the conference, on “five factors that block America from negotiating with the Muslim world.” According to him they are “injustice, transcendence, ignorance, greed and malignity.”

Haim Saban is a television and media mogul, ranked by Forbes as the 98th richest person in America. Saban and his family were forced to flee Egypt in 1956, he moved to Israel and then the United States. In the U.S. he is best known for his adaptation of the popular Power Rangers TV programme for children. It was noted in a recent dispatch that Saban, who has donated at least $13 million to U.S. politicians, now tops the list of donors to political campaigns in America.

ANTI-ISRAEL PROTESTORS ATTEMPT TO BLOCK FLOWERS FOR VALENTINE’S DAY

To coincide with the high-volume sales of Israeli flowers in Britain on Valentine’s Day, three anti-Israel protesters last week chained themselves to a fence outside the distribution site of Carmel-Agrexco in Middlesex, near London. Police arrested them. Some 90 other demonstrators blocked trucks from leaving Carmel-Agrexco’s distribution site. (Most of the trucks actually carried Coral strawberries grown by Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.)

The protest was launched by the UK-based Boycott Israeli Goods (BIG) Campaign who waged a five-day campaign against the sale of Israeli flowers.

The campaign was ultimately unsuccessful, the demonstrators did not succeed in causing any disruptions and all consignments reached their destinations safely. The boycott group says they will continue to lobby supermarkets not to sell Israeli flowers.

A new Jewish group has emerged to support BIG. Deborah Fink, a member of Jews for Justice for Palestinians (JfJfP), has set up Jews for Boycott of Israel Goods (J-BIG). Fink told the Jerusalem Post, “I wanted to do more on the boycott and wanted JfJfP to do it but couldn’t push them into doing it so in the end I started my own group and agreed last month to join up with BIG. I have about 30 signatories, which I know sounds small, but we have only just started.”

Last November, JfJfP disassociated the group from comments Fink made on an anti-Zionist blog in which she said: “Israel does not deserve to be called ‘the Jewish state.’ It should be called ‘the Satanic state.’ I really don’t see the point of doing anything else other than boycott it in every possible way.”

KNESSET EVENT HONORING DRUZE AND CIRCASSIAN COMMUNITIES

Last week, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert attended a special event at the Knesset (Israeli parliament) in honor of Israel’s Druze and Circassian communities. At the event, a special Knesset lobby for the integration of the Druze and Circassian communities into Israeli society was established.

Olmert promised the communities that action would be taken “so that the reality of life for the Druze and Circassian communities reflects their activity and their dedication on behalf of the State of Israel, and so that they will know that they are an inseparable part of us.”

He also congratulated the officers and soldiers of the IDF Druze battalion, which recently received a special Ground Forces Command commendation for their bravery against Hizbullah in south Lebanon last year, and praised the battalion’s “exemplary fighting spirit.”

ISRAELI PROFESSOR REBUKES IRISH SCHOLARS ON ACADEMIC BOYCOTT

Asher Susser, an Israeli professor from Tel Aviv University, has sharply criticized a group of Irish scholars for advocating an academic boycott of Israel.

South African-born Susser, who was on a visit to Ireland said the 61 professors and lecturers who called for a boycott in a letter to the Irish Times unfairly singled out Israel for criticism. “What surprises me is that these academics choose to focus on Israel as the only focus of their criticism of the entire international community,” Susser said.

He added, “I’ve never heard them talking about boycotting Sudan, for example, for committing genocide.” Susser also rejected the charge that Israel is an “apartheid state”, calling comparisons to South Africa “ignorant, propagandistic or both.”

DORON ALMOG’S SON PASSES AWAY

In September 2005, Doron Almog, a retired Israeli soldier, declined to disembark a plane at London’s Heathrow airport after learning a warrant had been issued for his arrest in Britain as a result of his time commanding troops in Gaza. Almog was due to give a fundraising talk in Britain for the Aleh Negev Rehabilitation Village that helps both Israeli Jews and Arabs with severe mental and physical disabilities. (For more, see Islamic militant Hizb ut-Tahrir infiltrates Reuters (& Prince Harry apologizes), Sept. 15, 2005.)

Almog’s own son who was mentally disabled, has now died. Eran Almog, 23, who suffered from sever autism, lost his battle with Castleman’s syndrome, a rare and fatal disease which strikes the lymph nodes. The Almog family was extremely open about their son’s disability, which helped dispel some of the stigmas associated with autism and retardation in Israeli society.

Meanwhile, during her visit to Israel earlier this month, British Foreign Minister Margaret Becket promised Ehud Olmert that British authorities will enact a similar law to the one now in effect in Belgium, so that people who had served in foreign armies couldn’t be targeted for arrest in the UK. The Belgian law transferred the authority to issue arrest warrants to foreign citizens on accusations of war crimes from the courts to the government, after Belgian anti-Israel activists issued warrants for the arrest of then-prime minister Ariel Sharon.

TEL AVIV MARKETS REACH RECORD HIGH

Trading on the Tel Aviv stock exchange ended on a record high last Wednesday. The TA-100 index, which groups the exchange’s top 100 listed companies, peaked at 1,001.68 points, a growth of 8.68 percent so far this year.

SAUDI PRINCE TO BUILD HOTEL IN TEL AVIV

Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal is in negotiations to build a hotel on Tel Aviv’s coastline. The planned project is a joint venture with the (Arab-Israeli) Abulafya family, which owns a structure on a plot on Herbert Samuel Street. According to the blueprints submitted to the Tel Aviv Municipality, an eight-story, 150-room hotel is planned for the site.

Bin Talal, the nephew of the late Saudi King Faisal, is believed to be worth $26.4 billion.

Two architects have already started working on the project. One is Bin Talal’s private architect, Basel al-Beiti, who has worked with him on oriental hotels across the world. The other is former Tel Aviv Chief City Engineer, Yisrael Gudovich.

SYRIAN GROUP CLAIMS THEY ARE HOLDING MISSING ISRAELI SOLDIER GUY HEVER

A Syrian group has claimed that they are holding missing Israeli soldier Guy Hever, who disappeared in 1997. The group claims that they “have a Zionist soldier captive.” Israeli officials say they are examining the reports.

A source involved in the Guy Hever affair told the Israeli paper Yediot Ahronot that “The Syrians are known for holding many people in cellars and prisons for no reason, without a trial and with no end in sight. Hundreds of people have spent dozens of years without anyone knowing about them. We are talking about Lebanese, Jordanian, Iraqis and Europeans, as well as Israelis who spend a long time there. The Syrians are failing to provide any information on those being held by them and are not cooperating.”

Hever’s mother said she believed her son had been in Syrian hands for a decade and criticized the Israeli government for seemingly doing nothing about it.

ISRAEL SUCCESSFULLY TEST FIRES ARROW MISSILE

In what is being hailed as an extremely important development for Israel’s defense, the IDF has test fired the anti-ballistic missile Arrow system for the first time during the night. The test was conducted simultaneously in two different fields and was deemed a success. The test took the anti-missile missile to its highest altitude so far, where it intercepted a virtual target. The Arrow is said to be the only defensive missile capable of taking out incoming missiles in the earth’s stratosphere.

The test was considered significant as it was carried out under extreme conditions and showed how the system could hopefully deal with enemy missiles, including those fired from Iran, possibly armed with chemical or nuclear warheads.

The Arrow system has been under development jointly by Israel and the United States for the past 19 years. It is meant to intercept medium and long-range ballistic missiles and is considered the most advanced of its kind in the world. The previous test of the Arrow system was carried out in daylight conditions in Israel in December 2005 and was also successful.

SUSPECT NAMED IN ELIE WIESEL ATTACK

The following note is an update to the dispatch Ilan Halimi brought to rest in Jerusalem (& Elie Wiesel assaulted in a San Francisco hotel) (Feb. 11, 2007).

Police have identified the man they believe attacked Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel at a San Francisco hotel earlier this month and issued an arrest warrant for him. He has been named as Eric Hunt, 22. San Francisco police say that they intend to charge Hunt with “kidnapping, false imprisonment, elder abuse, stalking, battery and committing a hate crime.”

In an interview with the Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera, Wiesel, 78, said the incident made him fear for his life and left him shaken. It is essential to find who the perpetrator was and whether he acted alone or as part of a group, Wiesel said. Wiesel is a survivor of the Auschwitz and Buchenwald Nazi death camps. He won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986.

ZUNDEL GETS MAXIMUM TERM FOR HOLOCAUST DENIAL; PAPON DIES

Separately, in Germany on Thursday, the Mannheim state court convicted far-right activist Ernst Zundel of incitement for denying the Holocaust, and sentenced him to the maximum five years in prison.

The 67-year-old, who was deported from Canada in 2005, was convicted on 14 counts of incitement for years of anti-Semitic activities, including denying the Holocaust (a crime in Germany), in documents and on the Internet.

Zundel showed no emotion when the verdict was read. His lawyer quoted from “Mein Kampf” and from Nazi race laws in his closing statements in order to somehow persuade the court that Zundel should be acquitted.

Another of Zundel’s five attorneys, Herbert Schaller, accused the court of not wanting to face a “scientific analysis” of the Holocaust, which he said could not be proven to have occurred.

Unpersuaded, the court then handed down Zundel the maximum sentence.

The French wartime Nazi collaborator Maurice Papon, who was sentenced to 10 years in prison for his role in deporting Jews to Nazi death camps, died on Saturday, aged 96. In spite of Papon’s role in carrying out the Holocaust, he was appointed budget minister in the French government after the war. His lawyer said he “died peacefully in his sleep.”

“THE ARABS KNOW THE TRUTH, BUT THIS DOESN’T CHANGE A THING”

The first article attached below concerns the recent excavations which have taken place at the Mugrabi Gate in the Old City of Jerusalem.

Whilst the affair has caused outrage in the Muslim world, many in Israel, including Elyakim Haetzni, writing below, argue that it proves “the futility of the dream of reconciliation with the Arabs. After all, it is clear to all, even to Leftist Jews, that the Arabs know the truth, but this doesn’t change a thing.”

Whilst many Imams have claimed Israel is “destroying part of the al-Aqsa Mosque,” the Israeli Aniquities Authority is merely replacing an access ramp that collapsed three years ago, for the benefit and safety of all visitors.

It should be noted that this ramp is being built for the safety of visitors, 97 percent of whom are non-Jewish, and that Israel has a second-to-none record of preserving and protecting the holy sites of all three major religions in Jerusalem.

A short video explaining the Israeli construction can be seen here.

***

In the second article attached below, Gwynne Dyer, a London-based independent journalist, argues that “walls are going up all over the world, and most of them will not come down for a long time, if ever.”

Whilst Israel’s (successful) security fence received widespread media attention, the latest country to build itself a fence, Thailand (to stop terrorists from crossing into Thailand’s restive Muslim-majority southern provinces from northern Malaysia), has received virtually no criticism. Surprisingly, this article was run on the website of an Arab paper (Arab News), albeit an English-language Arab newspaper.

This list/website has previously discussed the fence Saudi Arabia is building along the full length of its porous border with Yemen (at a cost of $8.5 billion). The Saudis are also now building a high-tech barrier along its 900-km (550-mile) border with Iraq, but no one is boycotting Saudi flowers as a result.

-- Tom Gross



FULL ARTICLE

ARABS KNOW EXCAVATION WORKS NOT DAMAGING MOSQUE

Truth and punishment
Arabs know excavation works not damaging mosque
By Elyakim Haetzni
Yediot Ahronot
February 12, 2007

www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3364001,00.html

There’s nothing like the Mugrabi Gate affair to prove the futility of the dream of reconciliation with the Arabs. After all, it is clear to all, even to Leftist Jews, that the Arabs know the truth, but this doesn’t change a thing.

Sheikh Ra’ad Salah stood there at the excavation site – expressly outside the Temple Mount compound, far from the mosques – and shamelessly announced: “This is a crime. Israel is destroying part of the al-Aqsa Mosque.”

“There’s no excuse for the excavation works that are undermining the sacredness of Islam.” I would have understood had the head of the Islamic Movement’s northern branch said this, but it’s surprising to hear King Abdullah of Jordan, a sought-after and beloved partner who knew about the excavations in advance, saying so. How can he accuse us of something he knows isn’t true, and that we know that he knows? And what does Olmert say to himself when Mahmoud Abbas, who received funds, arms and kisses from him, when Abbas attacked Israel “for changing the character of the place and making it Jewish” – when even he knows the truth.

This false protest is consciously backed by countries such as Morocco, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Jordan - all described by Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni as “moderate Arab states with whom we not only share the same values but also the same interests.” How will Livni explain that her new friends are now setting her up?

Slap in the face from Siniora

This question should concern the peace camp, because it is seeking to mortgage our future against the words and signatures of such people and regimes. Either the “partners” have remained enemies within, or despite them being “moderate” they are being pressured by their people to attack. Either way, the result is the same; we shall surrender the heart of our country, threaten our security, and risk a civil war in exchange for a commitment that is worthless.

Olmert received a similar slap in the face from Lebanon’s Prime Minister Fouad Siniora, who is presenting the deployment of troops in the south of Lebanon as an “achievement” of the last war. Even Siniora was informed of the plan to carry out excavation works in our sovereign territory, and knowing the truth he sent his army to fire at us and condemn us for our “Israeli aggression.”

The new Arab colleagues are no different than Arafat, who also knew that the Western wall Tunnel and Ariel Sharon’s visit to the Temple Mount did not undermine the mosques, yet despite this, with cold cynicism, he turned both these incidences into a casus belli for two wars.

The defense minister, who is folding under anti-truth terror, is reminiscent of Katherina in Shakespeare’s Taming of the Shrew.

Petruchio: I say it is the moon that shines so bright.

Katherina: I know it is the sun that shines so bright.

Petruchio: Now by my mother’s son, and that’s myself,
It shall be moon, or star, or what I list,
Or ere I journey to your father’s house.
Go on and fetch our horses back again.
Evermore cross’d and cross’d; nothing but cross’d!

Hortensio: Say as he says, or we shall never go.

Katherina: Forward, I pray, since we have come so far,
And be it moon, or sun, or what you please;
And if you please to call it a rush-candle,
Henceforth I vow it shall be so for me.

Petruchio: I say it is the moon.

Katherina: I know it is the moon.

Petruchio: Nay, then you lie; it is the blessed sun.

Katherina: Then, God be bless’d, it is the blessed sun;
But sun it is not, when you say it is not;
And the moon changes even as your mind.
What you will have it nam’d, even that it is,
And so it shall be so for Katherine.

 

WHY WALLS ARE GOING UP ALL OVER THE WORLD?

Why walls are going up all over the world?
By Gwynne Dyer
Arab News
February 18, 2007

www.arabnews.com/?page=7§ion=0&article=92084&d=13&m=2&y=2007

If good fences make good neighbors, then the world is experiencing an unprecedented outbreak of neighborliness. They used to wall cities. Now they wall whole countries.

The latest country to start building a wall – sorry, a “security fence” – is Thailand, which has just announced plans to build a physical barrier along the most inaccessible 75 km. (50 miles) of its frontier with Malaysia. The goal, says Bangkok, is to stop “terrorists” from crossing into Thailand’s restive Muslim-majority southern provinces from northern Malaysia, whose people share the same language and religion. If experience elsewhere is any guide, the whole border will be walled sooner or later.

India is well on the way to being walled (except along the Himalayas, where the mountains do the job for free). The barrier along its 3,000-km. (1,800-mile) border with Pakistan is largely complete except in the parts of Kashmir where the steep and broken terrain precludes the construction of the usual two-row, three-meter-high (ten-foot-high) fence, with concertina wire and mines between the two fences. And India is now building an even longer barrier (3,300 km., 1,950 miles) to halt illegal immigration from Bangladesh.

While India’s walls keep unwelcome intruders out, the barriers around North Korea are meant to keep North Koreans in. The original fortifications along the Demilitarised Zone between North and South Korea, which have been continually improved since the 1950s, were built mainly to stop infiltration by North Korean troops or saboteurs. However, the fence that Beijing is now building along its own frontier with North Korea is a precautionary measure to stop an immense wave of refugees from entering China if the regime in Pyongyang collapses.

The majority of the new walls springing up around the world are there to stop either terrorist attacks or illegal immigration, but sometimes they also serve as a unilateral way of defining a country’s desired borders. That is certainly true of the 2,700 km. (1,600 miles) of high sand or stone berms, backed by wire fences, mines, radar, troop bunkers and artillery bases, that seal off Western Sahara, annexed by Morocco in 1975, from the camps in Algeria from which many of the former inhabitants waged a guerrilla war until the 1991 cease-fire.

It is equally true of the wall that Israel is building through the occupied West Bank. The country has long had heavily mined and monitored barrier fences along its external frontiers with Egypt, Jordan, Syria and Lebanon and around the Gaza Strip, but the wall in the West Bank does not follow the cease-fire line of 1967. Instead it penetrates deep into the Palestinian territories at a number of points to leave Jewish settlement blocs on the Israeli side, and it cuts off (Arab) East Jerusalem from the West Bank entirely.

Pakistan is building a 1,500-mile fence with Afghanistan, Uzbekistan has built a fence along its border with Tajikistan, the United Arab Emirates is erecting a barrier along its frontier with Oman, and Kuwait is upgrading its existing 215-km (125-mile) wall along the Iraqi frontier. But the most impressive barriers are certainly around Saudi Arabia.

Saudis have been quietly pursuing an $8.5 billion project to fence off the full length of its porous border with Yemen for some years, but the highest priority now is to get a high-tech barrier built along the 900-km (550-mile) border with Iraq. “If and when Iraq fragments, there’s going to be a lot of people heading south,” said Nawaf Obaid, head of the Saudi National Security Assessment Project, “and that is when we have to be prepared.”

By comparison, the apparently endless debate about building a relatively low-tech fence along the 3,360-km (1,920-mile) US border with Mexico to cut illegal immigration seems like an echo from an innocent past.

The European Union’s feeble gestures toward curbing illegal immigration from Africa (fences around the Spanish enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla on the Moroccan coast, naval patrols off the Canary Islands) seem merely pathetic. But these are probably the last of the Good Old Days, at least in Europe.

The reason that the United States is incapable of controlling its Mexican border is political, not financial or technological: Powerful domestic lobbies work to ensure a steady supply of “undocumented” Mexican workers who will accept very low wages because they are in the United States illegally. President Bush has now been authorized by Congress to build a fence along about 1,125 km (700 miles) of the Mexican border, but he will stall as long as he can while experimenting with a so-called “virtual fence.”

No equivalent lobby operates in the European Union, and it is only a matter of time before really serious barriers appear on the EU’s land frontiers, especially with Russia, Belarus, Ukraine and Turkey. The walls are going up all over the world, and most of them will not come down for a long time, if ever.


“Israeli Apartheid Week” kicks off around the world

February 13, 2007

* Extreme left-wing Jews provide useful cover for the organizers
* Does anyone know what apartheid actually is?
* British Embassy in Tel Aviv helps pay for students to attend
* When is “Saudi Apartheid Week”?

 

1. “Israeli Apartheid Week” kicks off
2. An insult to black South Africans
3. Toronto University officially hosts web page advertising “Israel Apartheid Week”
4. When is “Saudi Apartheid Week”?
5. Avi Shlaim and Norman Finkelstein
6. Some might call them self-loathing
7. Ilan Pappe: Iran should get the bomb
8. “One of the most progressive states in the world”
9. “Modern Israel is a far cry from old South Africa” (By Irshad Manji, The Australian, Feb. 9, 2007)
10. “Worldwide events mark ‘Israeli Apartheid Week’” (Yediot Ahronot, Feb. 9, 2007)



[Note by Tom Gross]

“ISRAELI APARTHEID WEEK” KICKS OFF

Following on from the success of Jimmy Carter’s recent book which defames the state of Israel with various untruths, an international “Israeli Apartheid Week” began yesterday. It will last until Sunday, and be held jointly in New York, Toronto, Montreal, Ottawa, London, and at the universities of Oxford and Cambridge.

“Israel Apartheid Week” is comprised of several events featuring professors, students and economists. These include lectures, information booths, cultural events, film screenings and demonstrations.

On the official website (www.endisraeliapartheid.net), organizers claim “The past few years have seen an explosion of literature and analysis that has placed Israel alongside other settler-colonial states like South Africa, arguing that Israel is in fact an apartheid state, not just a belligerent occupying power.”

They say that the aim of the week is to “push forward the analysis of Israel as an apartheid state and to bolster support for the boycott, divestment, and sanctions campaign.”

AN INSULT TO BLACK SOUTH AFRICANS

Israel is, of course, not an apartheid state. Indeed it is the opposite. It is by far the most egalitarian state in the Middle East. Arab Israelis enjoy social and political freedoms and benefits only dreamed of by minority groups in most other countries in the world.

Israel grants full freedom of speech to its Arab parliamentarians, even when they call for Israel to be dismantled and for Hizbullah to bomb Israeli Jews. There is almost no another country in the world which permits such a degree of freedom to its internal opposition groups.

By saying that Israeli Arabs and Palestinians are being subjected to apartheid, Carter and others not only insult Israeli Jews, but also grossly malign black South Africans. Nelson Mandela and other black South Africans have been an inspiration to the world in the way they have demonstrated peaceful coexistence with the white population, whereas both the Palestinian Fatah and Hamas leadership and their supporters have repeatedly called for the mass murder of Jews, and taught kindergarten children that blowing up buses full of Israeli children is a glorious objective.

TORONTO UNIVERSITY OFFICIALLY HOSTS WEB PAGE ADVERTISING “ISRAEL APARTHEID WEEK”

The official University of Toronto web site includes a web page advertising the upcoming events. It can be seen here.

This page labels the entire current state of Israel as “Palestine” and places it next to a map of South Africa.

In response, the University of Toronto issued an official statement, “Concerns have been raised by some members of the community about an upcoming series of events to be held on campus by the Arab Students’ Collective under the title Israeli Apartheid Week... all University activity is subject to the laws of Canada, and behaviour or speech that constitutes hatred or incitement to hatred against any group will be dealt with quickly and appropriately.”

Presumably, advocating the destruction of a whole nation does not fall under the term “hate speech”.

The itinerary for the planned events at Toronto can be seen here.

Amongst the organizers of the events in England at the University of London’s School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) are Israeli Arab students who have their education subsidized by the government of Israel, and whose air fares to London for “Apartheid week” are being partly funded by the British Embassy in Tel Aviv.

WHEN IS “SAUDI APARTHEID WEEK”?

Only last month, Israel appointed Ghaleb Majadleh, a Muslim Arab, to the cabinet. For more, see the dispatch Israel appoints its first Arab cabinet minister (& Mossad-KGB double agent dies) (Jan. 11, 2007).

There are Arabs represented in many different political parties of both right and left in the Israeli Knesset and local councils. In fact, Arabs in Israel have the opportunity to progress in virtually every sector of society, from economics to politics to culture to sport. The Israeli soccer team, for example, has for many years included Israeli-Arab players. For more, see the dispatch Scoring goals against the “Israeli apartheid” myth (March 31, 2005). One of the players mentioned in this dispatch, Walid Badir, only last week scored for Israel in its game against Ukraine.

Similar to most other Arab Muslim countries, Saudi Arabia does not afford equal (or virtually any) rights to women, Christians, Jews, Hindus and others. To see Saudi apartheid in action please look at the first picture on this page, depicting a road for “Muslims only”.

AVI SHLAIM AND NORMAN FINKELSTEIN

A host of Jewish left-wing extremists will be participating in the “Israeli Apartheid Week” events. For example, at Oxford University, speakers include Israeli-born academic Avi Shlaim, who has based virtually his whole career on slandering Israel.

At Hamilton University in Ontario Canada, Professor Norman Finkelstein will be speaking on “Palestine & Israel: Roots of Conflict, Prospects for Peace.”

For Finkelstein’s views on the Holocaust, see the first note in the dispatch David Irving: Auschwitz “was a tourist attraction” (& British Muslims scrap Holocaust Day) (Jan. 31, 2007).

Also speaking in Montreal is Israeli-Arab Member of the Knesset (Israeli parliament) Jamal Zahalka. He told Yediot Ahronot (article attached below) that “Calling the occupation apartheid isn’t an overstatement, it’s an understatement... The Israeli occupation in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip are worse than apartheid.”

Zahalka apparently doesn’t see the irony that he is a freely elected member of the Israeli Knesset yet claims Israel is like apartheid in South Africa. Apparently he is unaware of what apartheid actually was.

He also seems to have “forgotten” that Israel withdrew entirely from Gaza in 2005, and that Gaza, for only the second time in two millennia has now been ethnically cleansed of any Jewish presence (other than a young Israeli, Gilad Shalit, kidnapped by the Hamas-led Palestinian government he apparently so admires). For more, see: Exodus from Gaza.

SOME MIGHT CALL THEM SELF-LOATHING

Among Israeli left-wing agitators taking part in the “Israeli Apartheid Week” events are the writer Yitzhak Laor (a poet, playwright and journalist for Ha’aretz), the filmmaker Eyal Sivan (who also teaches in the cinema department of Israel’s Sapir college in the Negev in southern Israel), the historian Dr Amnon Raz-Krakotzkin (from Ben Gurion University also of the Negev), who will speak at SOAS on “De-Arabization of Jews” (whatever that is), and Ryvka Bar Zohar, who is helping to organize the New York part of Israeli Apartheid Week.

Ilan Pappe from Haifa University, an advocate of ending the state of Israel and before that of boycotting Israeli institutions (including his own), will speak at Oxford University on “Resisting Apartheid: Divestment and Solidarity” on Friday. Chairing the meeting is Prof. Steven Rose, a British Jew who has led calls for a worldwide boycott of the Jewish state.

Other possible speakers mentioned include Prof. Gabi Piterberg, an Israeli from the University of California at Los Angeles, who has previously spoken on “Zionism and Apartheid.”

The participation of these Jewish academics has been warmly welcomed by many non-Jewish haters of Israel.

ILAN PAPPE: IRAN SHOULD GET THE BOMB

Last Sunday, at the American Colony Hotel in east Jerusalem, the unofficial base for the PLO in Jerusalem, Ilan Pappe received several standing ovations as he addressed a packed crowd to launch his new book, “The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine”.

According to my sources present, the audience included many western journalists, European diplomats, publicly-funded local UN staff, and anti-Israeli Jews including Mordechai Vanunu.

In his talk, Pappe, made an attack on Israeli Jewish politicians of left and right, and said it was “horrible” that Shimon Peres had received a Nobel peace prize. (He did not criticize Yasser Arafat for getting one.)

According to my sources present, Pappe said he was sympathetic to the idea of Iran getting a nuclear weapon, and “Arab states should have one too.”

He received rousing lengthy applause and many standing ovations.

“ONE OF THE MOST PROGRESSIVE STATES IN THE WORLD”

Partly in response to Jimmy Carter’s recent critique of Israel as an apartheid state, Irshad Manji, a brave Muslim woman who has dared to speak out against Muslim extremists and their fellow travelers, has in a new article labeled Israel “one of the most progressive states in the world.”

In her article (attached below), Manji (who is a long time subscriber to this email list) asks a number of important questions such as “Would an apartheid state award its top literary prize to an Arab? Israel honoured Emile Habibi in 1986, before the intifada might have made such a choice politically shrewd. Would an apartheid state encourage Hebrew-speaking schoolchildren to learn Arabic? Would road signs throughout the land appear in both languages? Even my country, the proudly bilingual Canada, doesn’t meet that standard.”

She continues: “Would a Hebrew newspaper in an apartheid state run an article by an Arab Israeli about why the Zionist adventure has been a total failure? Would it run that article on Israel’s independence day? Would an apartheid state ensure conditions for the freest Arabic press in the Middle East, a press so free that it can demonstrably abuse its liberties and keep on rolling? To this day, the East Jerusalem daily Al-Quds hasn’t retracted an anti-Israel letter supposedly penned by Nelson Mandela but proven to have been written by an Arab living in The Netherlands.”

Her article, from The Australian, should be read in full if you have time.

For more on Manji, who is author of “The Trouble with Islam Today: A Muslim’s Call for Reform in Her Faith,” see the dispatch “How I learned to love the wall” & more on Wafa Sultan, other Muslim “dissidents” (March 21, 2006).

-- Tom Gross



FULL ARTICLES

“WOULD AN APARTHEID STATE AWARD ITS TOP LITERARY PRIZE TO AN ARAB?”

Irshad Manji: Modern Israel is a far cry from old South Africa
It’s absurd to apply the term apartheid to one of the most progressive states in the world, maintains Irshad Manji
The Australian
February 9, 2007

www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21194124-7583,00.html

In the past year, a stream of thinkers across the West – from Australian writer Antony Loewenstein to US academics John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt – has punctured the usual parameters of debate about Israel. I, for one, welcome any effort to prevent ideas from calcifying into ideologies. As a Muslim refusenik, that’s what I do by defying the conventional prejudices of my fellow Muslims. Why would I resent refuseniks of a different kind?

It’s precisely because I embrace intellectual pluralism that I respectfully challenge Jimmy Carter’s recent critique of Israel as an apartheid state. To be sure, I’ve long admired the former US president. In my book The Trouble with Islam Today I cite him as an example of how religion can be invoked to tap the best of humanity. In no small measure, it was Carter’s appreciation of spiritual values that brought together Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin and Egyptian president Anwar Sadat, compelling these former foes to clasp hands over a peace deal.

Which is why Carter’s new book disappoints so many of us who champion co-existence. Entitled Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid, the book argues that Israel’s conduct towards Palestinians mimics South Africa’s long-time demonisation of blacks. Of course, certain Israeli politicians have spewed venom at Palestinians, as have some Arab leaders towards Jews, but Israel is far more complex – and diverse – than slogans about the occupation would suggest. In a state practising apartheid, would Arab Muslim legislators wield veto power over anything? At only 20per cent of the population, would Arabs even be eligible for election if they squirmed under the thumb of apartheid? Would an apartheid state extend voting rights to women and the poor in local elections, which Israel did for the first time in the history of Palestinian Arabs?

Would the vast majority of Arab Israeli citizens turn out to vote in national elections, as they’ve usually done? Would an apartheid state have several Arab political parties, as Israel does? In recent Israeli elections, two Arab parties found themselves disqualified for expressly supporting terrorism against the Jewish state. However, Israel’s Supreme Court, exercising its independence, overturned both disqualifications. Under any system of apartheid, would the judiciary be free of political interference?

Would an apartheid state award its top literary prize to an Arab? Israel honoured Emile Habibi in 1986, before the intifada might have made such a choice politically shrewd. Would an apartheid state encourage Hebrew-speaking schoolchildren to learn Arabic? Would road signs throughout the land appear in both languages? Even my country, the proudly bilingual Canada, doesn’t meet that standard.

Would an apartheid state be home to universities where Arabs and Jews mingle at will, or apartment blocks where they live side by side? Would an apartheid state bestow benefits and legal protections on Palestinians who live outside of Israel but work inside its borders? Would human rights organisations operate openly in an apartheid state? They do in Israel.

For that matter, military officials go public with their criticisms of government policies. In October 2003, the Israel Defence Forces’ chief of staff told the press that road closures in the West Bank and Gaza were feeding Palestinian anger. Two weeks later, four former heads of the Shin Bet security service blasted the occupation and called on Ariel Sharon to withdraw troops unilaterally, which later happened in Gaza. Would an apartheid state stomach so much dissent from those mandated to protect the state?

Above all, would media debate the most basic building blocks of the nation? Would a Hebrew newspaper in an apartheid state run an article by an Arab Israeli about why the Zionist adventure has been a total failure? Would it run that article on Israel’s independence day? Would an apartheid state ensure conditions for the freest Arabic press in the Middle East, a press so free that it can demonstrably abuse its liberties and keep on rolling? To this day, the East Jerusalem daily Al-Quds hasn’t retracted an anti-Israel letter supposedly penned by Nelson Mandela but proven to have been written by an Arab living in The Netherlands.

Even the eminence grise of Palestinian nationalism, the late Edward Said, stated flat out that “Israel is not South Africa”. How could it be when an Israeli publisher translated Said’s seminal work, Orientalism, into Hebrew? I’ll cap this point with a question that Said himself asked of Arabs: “Why don’t we fight harder for freedom of opinions in our own societies, a freedom, no one needs to be told, that scarcely exists?”

I disagree: some people still need to be told that Arab “freedoms” don’t compare to those of Israel. The people who need reminding are those who now push the South Africa analogy a step further by equating Israel with Nazi Germany. To them, Zionists are committing hate crimes under the totalitarian nightmare that they dub “Zio-Nazism” (like neo-Nazism).

When it comes to granting citizenship, Israel discriminates in the same way as an affirmative