Tom Gross Mideast Media Analysis

A remarkable photo (& blaming the Jews for anti-Semitism)

January 29, 2015

A remarkable photo:On the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, a group of child survivors point to a picture of themselves taken by the Soviet army on the day they were freed.From left to right, Miriam Ziegler, now aged 79, Paula Leibovitz, 81, Gabor Hirsch, 85, and Eva Kor, 80.

 

* Please “like” these dispatches on Facebook here www.facebook.com/TomGrossMedia, where you can also find other items that are not in these dispatches.

 

* You may wish to also read also last Saturday’s related dispatch: “I came out of hell”

 

CONTENTS

1. Sky News uses “Auschwitz remembered” program to blame the Jews for anti-Semitism
2. BBC: “Is the time coming to lay the Holocaust to rest?”
3. 84% of “Palestinians” believe Israel was behind Paris jihad massacres
4. The anti-Israel cult
5. Netanyahu’s International Holocaust Remembrance Day address at Yad Vashem
6. ISIS handbook: permissible to have sex with captured children
7. State Department-funded group pays for anti-Netanyahu campaign
8. Mossad chief angered by fake reports about him put out by Obama and Kerry
9. The Arab Spring, four years on
10. Israeli C4I network extends special ops reach


[Notes below by Tom Gross]

SKY NEWS USES “AUSCHWITZ REMEMBERED” PROGRAM TO BLAME THE JEWS FOR ANTI-SEMITISM

Sky TV’s most highly-regarded presenter, Adam Boulton, used an interview with the British Chief Rabbi on Holocaust Memorial Day on Tuesday to pursue the “Jews bring it on themselves” myth.

Blaming the victim, whether it is Jews or blacks or homosexuals, is of course one of the cruelest tricks played by racists and bigots.

You can see the clip from Sky’s “Auschwitz remembered” program here.

(Sky is a major international British-based broadcaster carried throughout the world. Rupert Murdoch owns it, although he doesn’t have any editorial control.)

 

BBC: “IS THE TIME COMING TO LAY THE HOLOCAUST TO REST?”

The BBC marked International Holocaust Remembrance Day by promoting its “Big Questions” program with the question “Is the time coming to lay the Holocaust to rest?”

Only one month ago, the head of BBC TV himself asked whether Jews even have a future in Britain given the sharp rise in anti-Semitism (see here together with my response).

Holocaust denial, Holocaust inversion and Holocaust belittling are of course key tools used by anti-Semites. Many are surprised the BBC would ask such a crass and insensitive question at the very moment Holocaust survivors were gathering in Auschwitz.

The BBC ran a number of important programs to mark Holocaust Memorial Day, including showing Claude Lanzmann’s “Shoah” on BBC Four.

The Big Questions program was originally titled “The Holocaust: Could something like this happen again?”

(For examples of outright Holocaust denial on the BBC Facebook page, please see here.)

Both the director of BBC TV and the director of BBC News and Current Affairs are subscribers to this list.

 

84% OF “PALESTINIANS” BELIEVE ISRAEL WAS BEHIND PARIS JIHAD MASSACRES

A poll conducted by the independent (and most reliable) Palestinian news agency, Ma’an, has found that 84.4% of Palestinians said yes to the statement “the operation (i.e. the terror attack on the Kosher market) was suspicious, and Israel may be behind it.” Only 8.7% believed Islamic extremists were behind the attack.

These results are not so surprising when one reads the (partly European-funded) official Palestinian media, which are full of conspiracy theories about Jews.

Palestinian Media Watch (PMW) have translated many articles from Al-Hayat Al-Jadida and other Palestinian media, arguing that Mossad planned the attacks in Paris.

Commentator Akram Atallah, interviewed on official PA TV, lied that “it is well know that in the past, the Israeli Mossad carried out operations (i.e. terror attacks). It bombed synagogues in order to force the Jews to emigrate.”

 

THE ANTI-ISRAEL CULT

The former AP reporter Matti Friedman delivered a very interesting talk in London on Monday. It is long so I include it at the foot of this dispatch.

(Matti Friedman is a subscriber to this email list.)

 

NEVER AGAIN

In his speech (text below) at Yad Vashem in Jerusalem to mark International Holocaust Remembrance Day on Tuesday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu raises important matters concerning Holocaust remembrance, and also the grave dangers of appeasing Iran which will likely lead to a nuclear arms race throughout the Middle East.


“My responsibility as Prime Minister of Israel is to ensure that the State of Israel will never again be threatened with destruction. My responsibility is to see to it that there will not be a reason to build additional memorial sites such as Yad Vashem.

The pending agreement with Iran is an agreement that endangers the State of Israel. It leaves Iran with the capabilities that will allow it to arm itself with nuclear weapons, one bomb at first and afterwards many atomic bombs. We cannot live with such an agreement; therefore, we oppose it. Even those who try to challenge us within our borders will discover that we are ready to respond with force. Israel views with utmost gravity the attack against it from Syrian territory. Those who play with fire will get burned.

Preserving the memory of the Holocaust is more important today than ever before.

We live in an age of resurgent and violent anti-Semitism, and commemorations like this ceremony remind us where humanity’s oldest and most enduring hatred can lead.

Many thought that after the horrors of the Holocaust, anti-Semitism would finally contract and disappear.

That has not happened.

Hatred of the Jews appeared to take a brief respite after World War II for a few decades.

It has now returned in full force.

Once again in Europe and elsewhere, Jews are being slandered, vilified and targeted just for being Jews.

This is taking place in the intolerant Middle East and in the very heart of the liberal and tolerant West.

It’s taking place in Tehran and Paris, in Gaza and Brussels. Around the world, Jewish communities are increasingly living in fear.

But it’s not just the Jewish people that is being slandered, vilified and targeted. It’s the Jewish state as well.

Israel is assaulted with the same slurs and libels that have been leveled at the Jews since time immemorial.

Islamist extremists have incorporated the most outrageous anti-Semitic calumnies into their murderous doctrine.

Take the Hamas Charter as one example of many.

It reads like the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the anti-Semitic forgery on which it is based. It calls for the murder of Jews and the destruction of their state.

Just as classic anti-Semites portrayed the Jew as the embodiment of all evil in the world, today’s anti-Semites portray the Jewish state in the same twisted manner.

And what do the so-called ‘enlightened’ organs of the international community do in response?

A quarter of a million people are slaughtered in Syria, poison gas is used against civilians, and who do the signatories to the Geneva Convention urgently meet to discuss? Israel.

Across the region, dictatorial regimes and brutal movements brutalize their peoples – suppressing women, lynching gays, forcing Christians to live in fear.

And who does the Human Rights Council of the United Nations condemn? Israel.

Hamas fires thousands of rockets at our civilians, deliberately targeting our people while hiding behind Palestinian civilians it uses as human shields.

And who does the ICC announce it will examine? Israel.

No rational examination of the facts could justify this assault on Israel, the Middle East’s only democracy, the most beleaguered democracy on earth.

This obsession with the Jewish people and their state has a name. It’s called anti-Semitism.

Some things just don’t change.

But I can tell you today what has changed.

We have changed.

The Jews have changed.

We are no longer a stateless people endlessly searching for a safe haven.

We are no longer a powerless people begging others to protect us.

Today we are an independent and sovereign people in our ancestral homeland.

Today we can speak out against the hateful voices of those seeking our destruction.

Today we can protect ourselves and defend our freedom.

Ladies and gentlemen,

The ayatollahs in Iran, they deny the Holocaust while planning another genocide against our people.

Let me be clear.

The Jewish people will defend itself by itself against any threat.

That’s what the Jewish state is all about.

Nonetheless, we appreciate the support of our friends around the world who reject the spreading twin diseases of anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism. They’re one in the same.

We are especially grateful for the bipartisan support for Israel across the United States, our great ally.

We share a special bond with the United States, which is built on common values and it’s reflected in our expansive cooperation, especially on matters of security.

Yet it is the Government of Israel that holds the ultimate responsibility for the security of the one and only Jewish state.

And here we must speak out and must speak our mind about the dangers to our people and our state. This is something we could not do at the time of the Holocaust.

Israel will reject any agreement that leaves Iran as a nuclear threshold state.

Regrettably, our understanding is that the offer made by the P5+1 does exactly that.

It would enable Iran to breakout to a nuclear weapon within a few months and many more bombs within a short time.

The capabilities of Iran to produce enriched uranium for atomic bombs are left intact.

Such an agreement is sure to spark a nuclear arms race in the region that would turn the Middle East into a nuclear tinderbox.

And such an agreement is simply unacceptable to Israel. We will oppose it and we will oppose it vigorously.

On this day of Holocaust remembrance, I pledge to you what we could neither say nor do 70 years ago.

Israel will always do what needs to be done to ensure the security of the Jewish people and the one and only Jewish state. That is the significance of this day.

Thank you.”

 

ISIS: PERMISSIBLE TO HAVE SEX WITH CAPTURED CHILDREN

CNN reports on the pamphlets handed out by IS militants in Mosul, Iraq, entitled, “Questions and Answers on Taking Captives and Slaves”:

Q: “Can all unbelieving women be taken captive?”

A: “There is no dispute among the scholars that it is permissible to capture unbelieving women [i.e. any non-Muslim woman].”

Q: “Can one have intercourse with a female captive?”

A: “It is permissible to have sexual intercourse with the female captive. Allah the almighty said: ‘[Successful are the believers] who guard their chastity, except from their wives or [the captives and slaves] that their right hands possess, for then they are free from blame [Koran 23:5-6]’.”

Q: “Is it permissible to have intercourse with a female slave who has not reached puberty?”

A: “It is permissible to have intercourse with the female slave who hasn’t reached puberty if she is fit for intercourse; however if she is not fit for intercourse, then it is enough to enjoy her without intercourse.”

More here.

***

I have written in previous dispatches about the thousands of Yazidi women and girls captured in Iraq and held as sex slaves by the Islamic State.

I also noted last summer when Mosul was captured by Isis that if John Kerry and others in Washington hadn’t been constantly obsessing in the first half of last year about Israel, he might have noticed the advance of Isis. Had Obama began his bombing campaign against Isis during this period, Mosul may well never have fallen to Isis in the first place. -- Tom Gross

 

STATE DEPARTMENT-FUNDED GROUP PAYS FOR ANTI-NETANYAHU CAMPAIGN

The Obama administration is directing considerable resources to trying to bring down the democratically elected leader of Israel.

A group funded by the U.S. State Department is financing a campaign by an Israeli leftist group to oust Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and has hired former Obama aides to help with its grassroots efforts, the Israeli paper Haaretz reported.

The national field director for President Obama’s 2012 reelection campaign Jeremy Bird is spearheading the effort, writes Haaretz.

The anti-Netanyahu Israeli organization OneVoice confirmed it is receiving assistance from former Obama staffers “on voter registration and get-out-the-vote efforts”. Haaretz reported that Bird is now working with other former Obama aides out of an office in Tel Aviv.

American donors are reportedly paying for the Obama campaign team.

Israel will hold elections on March 17.

Obama has refused to meet Netanyahu during his upcoming visit to the U.S.

There is much anger in Israel, even among those who don’t support Netanyahu, at the treatment of Israel in general and of Netanyahu in particular by Obama over the last 6 years.

As Israeli media commentators noted, German Chancellor Angela Merkel was hosted at the White House prior to the recent German elections. Former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown visited the White House twice prior to British elections. Those were won by Conservative party leader David Cameron, who himself visited Washington this month at Obama’s invitation to lobby the U.S. Congress against adopting new sanctions on Iran’s nuclear weapons program. So why does Obama treat Israel differently, many are asking.

 

MOSSAD CHIEF ANGERED BY FAKE REPORTS ABOUT HIM PUT OUT BY OBAMA AND KERRY

The head of Israel’s Mossad intelligence service Tamir Pardo issued an extremely rare public statement earlier this month in order to deny U.S. press reports which cited anonymous White House sources claiming he and other senior Mossad officials expressed opposition to a proposed bill by the U.S. congress designed to curtail Iran’s nuclear program.

The bill is welcomed by the Israeli government (and most Americans) but opposed by the Obama administration.

There was anger in Israel at what one commentator called “Obama’s below-the-belt attempts to pretend there was disagreement between Netanyahu and the Mossad on the need to keep the pressure on the Iranians, when in fact there is not.”

The Mossad statement “emphasized that the exceptional effectiveness of the sanctions imposed on Iran in recent years are what brought Iran to the negotiating table. The bad agreement taking shape [by the West] with Iran is likely to lead to a regional arms race.”

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry also said that a senior Israeli intelligence official told a Congressional delegation that recently visited Israel that additional sanctions would be “like throwing a grenade into the process.” The Mossad statement also specifically denied Kerry’s remarks.

On his forthcoming visit to Washington, Netanyahu is scheduled to be snubbed by the president but he has been invited for the third time to address both houses of Congress, a record held by only one other foreign leader, Winston Churchill.

Last week, Senator Robert Menendez (a senator from Obama’s own Democratic party) charged that the administration’s positions on talks with Iran sounded “like talking points that come straight out of Tehran.”

Menendez, speaking at a senate hearing, said his impression was that the administration backed “the Iranian narrative of victimization,” countering that, “they are the ones with original sin, an illicit nuclear weapons program going back over the course of 20 years that they are unwilling to come clean on. So I don’t know why we feel compelled to make their case.”

 

THE ARAB SPRING, FOUR YEARS ON

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2924709/Shocking-moment-female-socialist-activist-gunned-police-demonstrations-4th-anniversary-Arab-Spring-ousted-Hosni-Mubarak.html

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/isis-publicly-behead-man-in-syrian-town-square-for-insulting-allah-as-he-screams-for-help-10007806.html

 

ISRAEL SOLIDIFIES ITS DEFENSES

Israeli C4I Network Extends Special Ops Reach
By Barbara Opall-Rome
Defense News
January 27, 2015

http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/show-daily/solic/2015/01/26/israel-c4i-network-special-operations-roip-radio/22039469/

TEL AVIV — As Israel grapples with an arc of threats that emanate up and around the Arabian Sea, an Internet Protocol (IP)-supported communications network is augmenting its ability to command complex operations at its borders and far beyond.

Elements of the voice over IP (VoIP) network have been operational for years, and officials here credit it for supporting a months-long mission that culminated in the March 2014 seizure of an Iranian arms cache some 1,500 kilometers from Israel’s Red Sea coast.

But it was only in late December that the network was declared fully operational, connecting special units commanded by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) General Staff and IDF headquarters with all echelons operating under Israel’s three territorial commands.

“It’s state-of-the-art and it’s operational IDF-wide as of the end of 2014,” said Col. Yossi Mashiah, who managed the program as head of the Maof C4I Programs and Systems Engineering Department, part of the C4I Directorate of the IDF General Staff.

“We’re relative pioneers in this world. We started in early 2000 and now I can say with pride that no matter where the commanders are or where the forces are, there’s a single network-based radio communications for everyone.”

He added, “At the end of the day, you win wars and successfully accomplish special missions with radio.”

In a mid-January interview, Mashiah said parts of the network were used to support tactical forces in last summer’s Protective Edge operation in Gaza.

“In the past half-year, our people were in the field tweaking things. We went to Gaza to fix a satellite terminal one day and were out in the field with command centers on other days. ... Now it’s all humming nicely,” he said.

As for special missions, Mashiah cited last year’s Operation Full Disclosure, when Israel tracked the Klos C arms smuggling ship as it plied the Arabian Gulf, eventually seizing it as it made its way up through the Red Sea.

“Where ever you have the infrastructure for backhauling, you can use it,” Mashiah said. “I can’t provide any more specifics, but suffice it to say that this operational network of ours has been very broadly deployed.”

The multiyear program, which Mashiah estimated cost “tens of millions” of dollars, is managed by Maof and operated by the IDF’s Choshen Brigade, also part of the C4I Branch of the IDF General Staff.

Technology and standards are developed by state-owned Rafael, part of them under subcontract to Elbit Systems, developer of the IDF’s digital C4I network, known as Tzayad, or Digital Army Program (DAP).

The Hebrew name for the network is classified. For public consumption, program officials generically refer to it as Radio over IP (RoiP).

But Avriel S., a product line manager in Rafael’s Communications Directorate whose surname is withheld by the company for security reasons, says the network is much more than a radio system. Elements of the IDF system are available to export to license-approved nations under land- and sea-based systems marketed by Rafael, respectively, under the names C4I-Connect and Sea-Com.

“It’s radio, but it’s actually voice and data IP,” said Avriel S. “Radio is part of the voice communications, but everything can be transferred over this infrastructure, including telephony, intercom and all types of data. The RoiP project enables true interoperability by transferring voice and data between forces and across all command echelons.”

For all operations, including special operations, the network — which the Rafael executive noted is actually an application that lays on the IDF’s IP infrastructure — enables mission planning and mission implementation even in instances when servers are jammed or shut down.

“This is one of the special features. As long as they use smart terminals, everything will remain working without interference as long as the IP network is available, even in instances when servers are jammed or shut down,” Avriel S. said. “Once the communication traffic between users and the radio is established, you don’t need any server. You can’t allocate new sessions, but those already on can keep on transmitting and receiving.”

Another feature, he said, is the high reliability and inherent security measures built into the system, which is unlimited by range and adaptable to any method of communications relay.

“The ROIP communications are flexible and highly efficient, no matter where the forces are and whether they are supported by microwave link, satellites, whatever,” Avriel S. said.

Mashiah said more sophisticated versions are in the works to hone connectivity with the Israel Air Force, which now uses its own system to patch into the network. An electronics engineer specializing in tactical communication, he retired in mid-January after 27 years in the IDF, most of them in the Signals Corps.

“I’ve been with this program from the beginning, since I was a major, and I can tell you that it’s already revolutionized our ability to operate as a joint, networked force,” he said. “We’ve left the world of point-to-point communications via radio. Now it’s flexible. It’s everywhere to everywhere, unlimited by range or the amount of users authorized to be on the net.”


THE ANTI-ISRAEL CULT

A talk by Matti Friedman
London
January 26, 2015

One night several years ago, I came out of Bethlehem after a reporting assignment and crossed through the Israeli military checkpoint between that city and its neighbor, Jerusalem, where I live. With me were perhaps a dozen Palestinian men, mostly in their thirties – my age. No soldiers were visible at the entrance to the checkpoint, a precaution against suicide bombers. We saw only steel and concrete. I followed the other men through a metal detector into a stark corridor and followed instructions barked from a loudspeaker – Remove your belt! Lift up your shirt! The voice belonged to a soldier watching us on a closed-circuit camera. Exiting the checkpoint, adjusting my belt and clothing with the others, I felt like a being less than entirely human and understood, not for the first time, how a feeling like that would provoke someone to violence.

Consumers of news will recognize this scene as belonging to the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, which keeps the 2.5 million Palestinians in that territory under military rule, and has since 1967. The facts of this situation aren’t much in question. This should be an issue of concern to Israelis, whose democracy, military, and society are corroded by the inequality in the West Bank. This, too, isn’t much in question.

The question we must ask, as observers of the world, is why this conflict has come over time to draw more attention than any other, and why it is presented as it is. How have the doings in a country that constitutes 0.01 percent of the world’s surface become the

focus of angst, loathing, and condemnation more than any other? We must ask how Israelis and Palestinians have become the stylized symbol of conflict, of strong and weak, the parallel bars upon which the intellectual Olympians of the West perform their tricks – not Turks and Kurds, not Han Chinese and Tibetans, not British soldiers and Iraqi Muslims, not Iraqi Muslims and Iraqi Christians, not Saudi sheikhs and Saudi women, not Indians and Kashmiris, not drug cartel thugs and Mexican villagers. Questioning why this is the case is in no way an attempt to evade or obscure reality, which is why I opened with the checkpoint leading from Bethlehem. On the contrary – anyone seeking a full understanding of reality can’t avoid this question. My experiences as a journalist provide part of the answer, and also raise pressing questions that go beyond the practice of journalism.

I have been writing from and about Israel for most of the past 20 years, since I moved there from Toronto at age 17. During the five and a half years I spent as part of the international press corps as a reporter for the American news agency The Associated Press, between 2006 and 2011, I gradually began to be aware of certain malfunctions in the coverage of the Israel story – recurring omissions, recurring inflations, decisions made according to considerations that were not journalistic but political, all in the context of a story staffed and reported more than any other international story on earth. When I worked in the AP’s Jerusalem bureau, the Israel story was covered by more AP news staff than China, or India, or all of the fifty-odd countries of sub-Saharan Africa combined. This is representative of the industry as a whole.

In early 2009, to give one fairly routine example of an editorial decision of the kind I mean, I was instructed by my superiors to report a second-hand story taken from an Israeli newspaper about offensive T-shirts supposedly worn by Israeli soldiers. We had no confirmation of our own of the story’s veracity, and one doesn’t see much coverage of things US Marines or British infantrymen have tattooed on their chests or arms. And yet T-shirts worn by Israeli soldiers were newsworthy in the eyes of one of the world’s most powerful news organizations. This was because we sought to hint or say outright that Israeli soldiers were war criminals, and every detail supporting that portrayal was to be seized upon. Much of the international press corps covered the T-shirt story. At around the same time, several Israeli soldiers were quoted anonymously in a school newsletter speaking of abuses they had supposedly witnessed while fighting in Gaza; we wrote no fewer than three separate stories about this, although the use of sources whose identity isn’t known to reporters is banned for good reason by the AP’s own in-house rules. This story, too, was very much one that we wanted to tell. By the time the soldiers came forward to say they hadn’t actually witnessed the events they supposedly described, and were trying to make a point to young students about the horrors and moral challenges of warfare, it was, of course, too late.

Also in those same months, in early 2009, two reporters in our bureau obtained details of a peace offer made by the Israeli Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert, to the Palestinians several months before, and deemed by the Palestinians to be insufficient. The offer proposed a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza with a capital in a shared Jerusalem. This should have been one of the year’s biggest stories. But an Israeli peace offer and its rejection by the Palestinians didn’t suit OUR story. The bureau chief ordered both reporters to ignore the Olmert offer, and they did, despite a furious protest from one of them, who later termed this decision “the biggest fiasco I’ve seen in 50 years of journalism.” But it was very much in keeping not only with the practice at the AP, but in the press corps in general. Soldiers’ vile t-shirts were worth a story. Anonymous and unverifiable testimonies of abuses were worth three. A peace proposal from the Israeli prime minister to the Palestinian president was not to be reported at all.

Vandalism of Palestinian property is a story. Neo-Nazi rallies at Palestinian universities or in Palestinian cities are not -- I saw images of such rallies suppressed on more than one occasion. Jewish hatred of Arabs is a story. Arab hatred of Jews is not. Our policy, for example, was not to mention the assertion in the Hamas founding charter that Jews were responsible for engineering both world wars and the Russian and French revolutions, despite the obvious insight this provides into the thinking of one of the most influential actors in the conflict.

100 houses in a West Bank settlement are a story. 100 rockets smuggled into Gaza are not. The Hamas military buildup amid and under the civilian population of Gaza is not a story. But Israeli military action responding to that threat – that is a story, as we all saw this summer. Israel’s responsibility for the deaths of civilians as a result – that’s a story. Hamas’s responsibility for those deaths is not. Any reporter from the international press corps in Israel, whether he or she works for the AP, Reuters, CNN, the BBC, or elsewhere, will recognize the examples I’ve cited here of what is newsworthy and what is not as standard operating procedure.

In my time in the press corps I saw, from the inside, how Israel’s flaws were dissected and magnified, while the flaws of its enemies were purposely erased. I saw how the threats facing Israel were disregarded or even mocked as figments of the Israeli imagination, even as these threats repeatedly materialized. I saw how a fictional image of Israel and of its enemies was manufactured, polished, and propagated to devastating effect by inflating certain details, ignoring others, and presenting the result as an accurate picture of reality. Lest we think this is something that has never happened before, we might remember Orwell’s observation about journalism from the Spanish civil war: “Early in life,” he wrote, “I had noticed that no event is ever correctly reported in a newspaper, but in Spain, for the first time, I saw newspaper reports which do not bear any relation to the facts, not even the relationship which is implied in an ordinary lie. … I saw, in fact, history being written not in terms of what had happened but of what ought to have happened according to various ‘party lines.’” That was in 1942.

Over time, I came to understand that the malfunctions I was witnessing, and in which I was playing a part, were not limited to the AP. I saw that they were rather part of a broader problem in the way the press functioned, and in how it saw its job. The international press in Israel had become less an observer of the conflict than a player in it. It had moved away from careful explanation and toward a kind of political character assassination on behalf of the side it identified as being right. It valued a kind of ideological uniformity from which you were not allowed to stray. So having begun with limited criticism of certain editorial decisions, I now found myself with a broad critique of the press.

Eventually, however, I realized that even the press wasn’t the whole story. The press was playing a key role in an intellectual phenomenon taking root in the West, but it wasn’t the cause, or not the only cause – it was both blown on a certain course by the prevailing ideological winds, and causing those winds to blow with greater force. Many journalists would like you to believe that the news is created by a kind of algorithm – that it’s a mechanical, even scientific process in which events are inserted, processed, and presented. But of course the news is an imperfect and entirely human affair, the result of interactions between sources, reporters, and editors, all of whom bear the baggage of their background and who reflect, as we all do to some extent, the prejudices of their peers.

In the aftermath of last summer’s Gaza war, and in light of events in Europe in recent months, it should be clear that something deep and toxic is going on. Understanding what that is, it seems to me, will help us understand something important not only about journalism but about the Western mind and the way it sees the world.

What presents itself as political criticism, as analysis, or as journalism, is coming to sound more and more like a new version of a much older complaint – that Jews are troublemakers, a negative force in world events, and that if these people, as a collective, could somehow be made to vanish, we would all be better off. This is, or should be, a cause for alarm, and not only among people sympathetic to Israel or concerned with Jewish affairs. What is in play right now has less to do with the world of politics than with the worlds of psychology and religion, and less to do with Israel than with those condemning Israel.

The occupation of the West Bank, with which I opened, would seem to be at the heart of the story, the root cause, as it were, of the conflict portrayed as the most important on earth. A few words, then, about this occupation.

The occupation was created in the 1967 Mideast war. The occupation is not the conflict, which of course predates the occupation. It is a symptom of the conflict, a conflict that would remain even if the symptom were somehow solved. If we look at the West Bank, the only Palestinian area currently occupied by Israel, and if we include Jerusalem, we see that the conflict in these areas claimed 60 lives last year – Palestinian and Israeli.

An end to this occupation would free Palestinians from Israeli rule, and free Israelis from ruling people who do not wish to be ruled. Observers of the Middle East in 2015 understand, too, that an end to the occupation will create a power vacuum that will be filled, as all power vacuums in the region have been, not by the forces of democracy and modernity, which in our region range from weak to negligible, but by the powerful and ruthless, by the extremists. This is what we’ve learned from the unraveling of the Middle East in recent years. This is what happened in Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, and Egypt, and before that in Gaza and southern Lebanon. My home in Jerusalem is within an easy day’s drive of both Aleppo and Baghdad. Creating a new playground for these forces will bring the black-masked soldiers of radical Islam within yards of Israeli homes with mortars, rockets, and tunneling implements. Many thousands will die.

Beyond the obvious threat to Palestinian Christians, women, gays, and liberals, who will be the first to suffer, this threatens to render much or all of Israel unlivable, ending the only safe progressive space in the Middle East, the only secure minority refuge in the Middle East, and the only Jewish country on earth. No international investment or guarantees, no Western-backed government or Western-trained military will be able to keep that from happening, as we have just seen in Iraq. The world will greet this outcome with sincere expressions of sympathy. Only several years ago I, like many on the left, might have dismissed this as an apocalyptic scenario. It isn’t. It is the most likely scenario.

People observing this conflict from afar have been led to believe that Israel faces a simple choice between occupation and peace. That choice is fiction. The Palestinian choice, it is said, is between Israeli occupation and an independent democracy. That choice, too, is fiction. Neither side faces a clear choice, or clear outcomes. Here we have a conflict in a region of conflict, with no clear villain, no clear victim, and no clear solution, one of many hundreds or thousands of ethnic, national, and religious disputes on earth.

The only group of people subject to a systematic boycott at present in the Western world is Jews, appearing now under the convenient euphemism “Israelis.” The only country that has its own “apartheid week” on campuses is the Jewish country. Protesters have interfered with the unloading of Israeli shipping on the West Coast of the United States, and there are regular calls for a boycott of anything produced in the Jewish state. No similar tactics are currently employed against any other ethnic group or nationality, no matter how egregious the human rights violations attributed to that group’s country of origin.

Anyone who questions why this is so will be greeted with shouts of “the occupation!”, as if this were explanation enough. It is not. Many who would like to question these phenomena don’t dare, for fear that they will somehow be expressing support for this occupation, which has been inflated from a geopolitical dilemma of modest scope by global standards into the world’s premier violation of human rights.

The human costs of the Middle Eastern adventures of America and Britain in this century have been far higher, and far harder to explain, than anything Israel has ever done. They have involved occupations, and the violence they unleashed continues as I speak here this evening. No one boycotts American or British professors. Turkey is a democracy, and a NATO member, and yet its occupation of northern Cyprus and long conflict with the stateless Kurds – many of whom see themselves as occupied – are viewed with a yawn; there is no “Turkish Apartheid Week.” The world is full of injustice. Billions of people are oppressed. In Congo, 5 million people are dead. The time has come for everyone to admit that the fashionable disgust for Israel among many in the West is not liberal but is selective, disproportionate, and discriminatory.

There are simply too many voices coming from too many places, expressing themselves in too poisonous a way, for us to conclude that this is a narrow criticism of the occupation. It’s time for the people making these charges to look closely at themselves, and for us to look closely at them.

Naming and understanding this sentiment is important, as it is becoming one of the key intellectual trends of our time. We might think of it as the “Cult of the Occupation.” This belief system, for that it what it is, uses the occupation as a way of talking about other things.

As usual with Western religions, the center of this one is in the Holy Land. The dogma posits that the occupation is not a conflict like any other, but that it is the very symbol of conflict: that the minute state inhabited by a persecuted minority in the Middle East is in fact a symbol of the ills of the West – colonialism, nationalism, militarism, and racism. In the recent riots in Ferguson, Missouri, for example, a sign hoisted by marchers linked the unrest between African Americans and the police to Israeli rule over Palestinians.

The cult’s priesthood can be found among the activists, NGO experts, and ideological journalists who have turned coverage of this conflict into a catalogue of Jewish moral failings, as if Israeli society were different from any other group of people on earth, as if Jews deserve to be mocked for having suffered and failed to be perfect as a result.

Most of my former colleagues in the press corps aren’t full-fledged members of this group. They aren’t true believers. But boycotts of Israel, and only of Israel, which are one of the cult’s most important practices, have significant support in the press, including among editors who were my superiors. Sympathy for Israel’s predicament is highly unpopular in the relevant social circles, and is something to be avoided by anyone wishing to be invited to the right dinner parties, or to be promoted. The cult and its belief system are in control of the narrative, just as the popular kids in a school and those who decide what clothes or music are acceptable. In the social milieu of the reporters, NGO workers, and activists, which is the same social world, these are the correct opinions. This guides the coverage. This explains why the events in Gaza this summer were portrayed not as a complicated war like many others fought in this century, but as a massacre of innocents. And it explains much else.

So prevalent has this kind of thinking become that participating in liberal intellectual life in the West increasingly requires you to subscribe at least outwardly to this dogma, particularly if you’re a Jew and thus suspected of the wrong sympathies. If you’re a Jew from Israel, your participation is increasingly conditional on an abject and public display of self-flagellation. Your participation, indeed, is increasingly unwelcome.

What, exactly, is going on?

Observers of Western history understand that at times of confusion and unhappiness, and of great ideological ferment, negative sentiment tends to coagulate around Jews. Discussions of the great topics of the time often end up as discussions about Jews.

In the late 1800s, for example, French society was riven by the clash between the old France of the church and army, and the new France of liberalism and the rule of law. The French were preoccupied with the question of who is French, and who is not. They were smarting from their military humiliation by the Prussians. All of this sentiment erupted around the figure of a Jew, Alfred Dreyfus, accused of betraying France as a spy for Germany. His accusers knew he was innocent, but that didn’t matter; he was a symbol of everything they wanted to condemn.

To give another example: Germans in the 1920s and ‘30s were preoccupied with their humiliation in the Great War. This became a discussion of Jewish traitors who had stabbed Germany in the back. Germans were preoccupied as well with the woes of their economy – this became a discussion of Jewish wealth, and Jewish bankers.

In the years of the rise of Communism and the Cold War, communists concerned with their ideological opponents talked about Jewish capitalists and cosmopolitans, or Jewish doctors plotting against the state. At the very same time, in capitalist societies threatened by communism, people condemned Jewish Bolsheviks.

This is the face of this recurring obsession. As the journalist Charles Maurras wrote, approvingly, in 1911: “Everything seems impossible, or frighteningly difficult, without the providential arrival of anti-Semitism, through which all things fall into place and are simplified.”

The West today is preoccupied with a feeling of guilt about the use of power. That’s why the Jews, in their state, are now held up in the press and elsewhere as the prime example of the abuse of power. That’s why for so many the global villain, as portrayed in newspapers and on TV, is none other than the Jewish soldier, or the Jewish settler. This is not because the Jewish settler or soldier is responsible for more harm than anyone else on earth – no sane person would make that claim. It is rather because these are the heirs to the Jewish banker or Jewish commissar of the past. It is because when moral failure raises its head in the Western imagination, the head tends to wear a skullcap.

One would expect the growing scale and complexity of the conflict in the Middle East over the past decade to have eclipsed the fixation on Israel in the eyes of the press and other observers. Israel is, after all, a sideshow: The death toll in Syria in less than four years far exceeds the toll in the Israel-Arab conflict in a century. The annual death toll in the West Bank and Jerusalem is a morning in Iraq.

And yet it is precisely in these years that the obsession has grown worse.

This makes little sense, unless we understand that people aren’t fixated on Israel despite everything else going on – but rather because of everything else going on. As Maurras wrote, when you use the Jew as the symbol of what is wrong, “all things fall into place and are simplified.”

The last few decades have brought the West into conflict with the Islamic world. Terrorists have attacked New York, Washington, London, Madrid, and now Paris. America and Britain caused the unraveling of Iraq, and hundreds of thousands of people are dead there. Afghanistan was occupied and thousands of Western soldiers killed, along with countless civilians – but the Taliban are alive and well, undeterred. Ghaddafi was removed, and Libya is no better off. All of this is confusing and discouraging. It causes people to search for answers and explanations, and these are hard to come by. It is in this context that the Cult of the Occupation has caught on. The idea is that the problems in the Middle East have something to do with Jewish arrogance and perfidy, that the sins of one’s own country can be projected upon the Western world’s old blank screen. This is the idea increasingly reflected on campuses, in labor unions, and in the media fixation on Israel. It’s a projection, one whose chief instrument is the press.

As one BBC reporter informed a Jewish interviewee on camera several weeks ago, after a Muslim terrorist murdered four Jewish shoppers at a Paris supermarket, “Many critics of Israel’s policy would suggest that the Palestinians suffered hugely at Jewish hands as well.” Everything, that is, can be linked to the occupation, and Jews can be blamed even for the attacks against them. This isn’t the voice of the perpetrators, but of the enablers. The voice of the enablers is less honest than that of the perpetrators, and more dangerous for being disguised in respectable English. This voice is confident and growing in volume. This is why the year 2015 finds many Jews in Western Europe eyeing their suitcases again.

The Jews of the Middle East are outnumbered by the Arabs of the Middle East 60 to 1, and by the world’s Muslims 200 to 1. Half of the Jews in Israel are there because their families were forced from their homes in the 20th century not by Christians in Europe, but by Muslims in the Middle East. Israel currently has Hezbollah on its northern border, al-Qaeda on its northeastern and southern borders, and Hamas in Gaza. None of these groups seek an end to the occupation, but rather openly wish to destroy Israel. But it is naïve to point out these facts. The facts don’t matter: We are in the world of symbols. In this world, Israel has become a symbol of what is wrong – not Hamas, not Hezbollah, not Great Britain, not America, not Russia.

I believe it’s important to recognize the pathologies at play in order to make sense of things. In this context it’s worth pointing out that I’m hardly the first to identify a problem – Jewish communities like this one have been expending immense efforts to correct it. I wish this wasn’t necessary, and it shouldn’t be necessary, but it undoubtedly is necessary, and becoming more so, and I have great respect for these efforts. Many people, particularly young people, are having trouble maintaining their balance amid this ideological onslaught, which is successfully disguised as journalism or analysis, and is phrased in the language of progressive politics. I would like to help them keep their bearings.

I don’t believe, however, that anyone should make a feeling of persecution the center of their identity, of their Judaism, or of their relationship with Israel. The obsession is a fact, but it isn’t a new fact, and it shouldn’t immobilize us in anger, or force us into a defensive crouch. It shouldn’t make us less willing to seek to improve our situation, to behave with compassion to our neighbors, or to continue building the model society that Israel’s founders had in mind.

I was in Tel Aviv not long ago, on Rothschild Boulevard. The city was humming with life. Signs of prosperity were everywhere, in the renovated Bauhaus buildings, in the clothes, the stores. I watched the people go by: Kids with old bikes and tattoos, businesspeople, men with women, women with women, men with men, all speaking the language of the Bible and Jewish prayer. The summer’s Hamas rockets were already a memory, just a few months old but subsumed in the frantic, irrepressible life of the country. There were cranes everywhere, raising new buildings. There were schoolchildren with oversize knapsacks, and parents with strollers. I heard Arabic, Russian, and French, and the country went about its business with a potent cheer and determination that you miss if all you see are threats and hatred. There have always been threats and hatred, and it has never stopped us. We have enemies, and we have friends. The dogs bark, as the saying goes, and the convoy rolls by.

One of the questions presented to us by the wars of the modern age is what now constitutes victory. In the 21st century, when a battlefield is no longer conquered or lost, when land isn’t changing hands and no one ever surrenders, what does it mean to win?

The answer is that victory is no longer determined on the battlefield. It’s determined in the center, in the society itself. Who has built a better society? Who has provided better lives for people? Where is there the most optimism? Where can the most happy people be found? One report on world happiness ranked Israel as the 11th happiest country on earth. The UK was 22nd.

Israel’s intellectual opponents can rant about the moral failings of the Jews, obscuring their obsession in whatever sophisticated way they choose. The gunmen of Hamas and their allies can stand on heaps of rubble and declare victory. They can fire rockets, and shoot up supermarkets. But if you look at Tel Aviv, or at any thriving neighborhood in Jerusalem, Netanya, Rishon Letzion, or Haifa, you understand that this is victory. This is where we’ve won, and where we win every day.

***

A reader writes: He could just as easily have written about how dehumanizing it is for the soldiers, forced to give up years to their young lives, to stand hour after hour and day after day behind barricades trying to protect themselves, their buddies, and their people from murder.


“I came out of hell”

January 24, 2015

Danuta Bogdaniuk-Bogucka was 10 years old when she was sent to Auschwitz-Birkenau camp with her mother. She was experimented on there by Josef Mengele.

 

Jacek Nadolny was 7 during the Warsaw Uprising, when he was sent with his family to Auschwitz-Birkenau.

 

* This dispatch concerns anti-Semitism and International Holocaust Memorial Day. (To remind readers, I am posting many additional Middle East items here: www.facebook.com/TomGrossMedia.)

* There is another dispatch which includes items about Holocaust Memorial Day here: A remarkable photo (& blaming the Jews for anti-Semitism)

***

(Thank you to those who cited from or linked to this dispatch, such as former U.S. Deputy National Security Advisor Elliot Abrams in the Council on Foreign Relations and Israel Hayom.)

 

CONTENTS

1. “Beautiful portraits of Auschwitz survivors”
2. “I came out of hell into the light”
3. “Stranger”
4. “Why Vladimir Putin should be at the Auschwitz memorial ceremony”
5. Argentine Jewish groups to boycott government Holocaust ceremony
6. Ten Israeli tourists injured in anti-Semitic attack in Argentina
7. Jewish boy, 13, assaulted in anti-Semitic attack in Paris
8. Non-Jewish Swedish journalist assaulted in Malmo after donning kippah
9. Attacks on London Jews rise by 128 percent
10. Still so much to learn


[Notes below by Tom Gross]

“BEAUTIFUL PORTRAITS OF AUSCHWITZ SURVIVORS”

Tuesday marks the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, Nazi Germany’s largest death camp, where more than one million Jews -- including hundreds of thousands of children -- were murdered, and other Jews and Roma were subjected to horrific torture under the guise of “medical experimentation” without anesthesia. (Other Jews, including children, were experimented on in Ravensbrück, Dachau, Buchenwald, Sachsenhausen, Natzweiler, Baranowicze and elsewhere.)

Several newspapers and websites are running a series of articles about the Holocaust in the run up to International Holocaust Memorial Day on Tuesday.

Reuters photographers have released these beautiful portraits of elderly survivors.

 

“I CAME OUT OF HELL INTO THE LIGHT”

The (London) Daily Mail reports on an emotional reunion between Joshua Kaufman, 87, and his rescuer Daniel Gillespie. Now aged 89.

The pair saluted each other as they were reunited on Huntington Beach, California.

Former U.S. soldier Gillespie said Kaufman was a “walking corpse” when he was rescued from Dachau death camp, near Munich.

At their reunion 70 years later, Kaufman first saluted his rescuer, then kissed his hand before falling to his feet, exclaiming: “I have wanted to do this for 70 years. I love you, I love you so much.”

Dachau was liberated by U.S. forces on April 29, 1945.

Kaufman said: “I came out of hell into the light. For that, and to him, I am eternally grateful.”

The reunion was organized last week by the “History Channel Deutschland” and will be screened in May.

Pictures here.

 

“STRANGER”

In this new video, Auschwitz survivor Roman Kent, who is president of the International Auschwitz Committee, reads Primo Levi’s poem “Stranger”.

Primo Levi’s account of his survival in Auschwitz, If This Is A Man, is in some respects the most important book of the Twentieth century -- in my opinion.

 

“WHY VLADIMIR PUTIN SHOULD BE AT THE AUSCHWITZ MEMORIAL CEREMONY: WE SHOULD FORGET NEITHER THE SOVIET UNION’S ROLE IN LIBERATING THE CAMPS NOR IT’S ANTI-SEMITIC BLIND SPOTS”

Antony Beevor, one of Britain’s leading historians, writes in The Guardian:

On 27 January 1945 a reconnaissance patrol from the Soviet 107th Rifle Division emerged from the snow-laden forest 70km west of Krakow. The soldiers were mounted on shaggy ponies, their submachine guns slung across their backs. In front of them stood Auschwitz-Birkenau, the grimmest symbol of modern history. Officers gazed around in disbelief, then called in medical teams to care for the 3,000 sick prisoners left behind.

It is a great shame that Vladimir Putin, having not been invited, won’t be present at a memorial ceremony next week to mark the 70th anniversary – at the very least, it would have reminded the world that the advance of Stalin’s Red Army forced the SS to abandon the extermination camps in the east. And yet the muted row over the Russian president’s absence is a reminder that this particular chapter in Russia’s second world war history was, and remains, full of contradictions.

The first death camp to be liberated by the Red Army was Majdanek just outside Lublin, in July 1944. The novelist and war correspondent Vasily Grossman was on the spot with the 8th Guards Army, which had defended Stalingrad, but an order came down that he was not to cover the story. The job was given instead to Konstantin Simonov, a favourite of the regime, who managed to avoid mentioning that any of the victims in Majdanek were Jewish.

Grossman, despite warnings from his friend Ilya Ehrenburg, had been slow to believe that anti-Semitism could exist within the Soviet hierarchy during the death struggle with Nazism. But in 1943 he had noticed that any reference to Jewish suffering was being cut from his articles…. Certain truths about the Shoah could never be published. When Grossman wrote about the extermination camp of Treblinka, he could not reveal that the auxiliary guards were mostly Ukrainian….

As the end of the war approached, controls became even stricter. Auschwitz may have been liberated at the end of January 1945, but no details were released until the final victory in May… Thus in a way Stalin was the first Holocaust denier, even if his anti-Semitism was not quite the same as that of the Nazis…

Full piece here.

* See also: “By the time the Soviet Army reached Auschwitz, my father was no longer there”

* See also: “A shy little bird hidden in my rib cage”.

 

ARGENTINE JEWISH GROUPS ANNOUNCE BOYCOTT OF GOVERNMENT HOLOCAUST CEREMONY

Argentina’s Jewish institutions have jointly announced that they will boycott the country’s official Holocaust Memorial Day ceremony on Tuesday to protest the murder last week of AMIA prosecutor Alberto Nisman, and the continuing cover-up of the 1994 AMIA center bombing, in which 85 Jews were murdered.

The Holocaust Museum of Buenos Aires and other organizations said they could not in good conscience stand alongside Argentinean government officials and would instead hold their own Holocaust memorial ceremony on Jan. 27.

Alberto Nisman was murdered last weekend one day before he was to deliver his long-awaited report accusing President Cristina Kirchner and Foreign Minister Hector Timerman of taking “the criminal decision of inventing Iran’s innocence to satisfy commercial, political and geopolitical interests of the Argentine republic.”

Nisman, who led the bombing probe for a decade, was found dead of a gunshot wound in his apartment on Monday just hours before he was to testify at the National Congress.

President Kirchner has now admitted initial government clams of suicide were wrong and Nisman was indeed murdered.

Thousands of people held a rally at the rebuilt AMIA headquarters in Buenos Aires last week demanding “truth and justice” from the government, and chanting “86, 86”, a reference to Nisman becoming in effect the 86th victim of the AMIA terrorists.

A similar protest was held outside the Argentine embassy in Tel Aviv, by Argentinean Jews who have emigrated to Israel, holding up placards reading “Yo soy Nisman,” Spanish for “Je suis Nisman.”

* Related links:

Alberto Nisman, The Man Who Knew Too Much

Is Iran Behind the Murder of Alberto Nisman?

AMIA investigator Claudio Lifschitz kidnapped and tortured

 

10 ISRAELI TOURISTS INJURED IN ANTI-SEMITIC ATTACK IN ARGENTINA

Ten Israeli tourists have been wounded in an anti-Semitic attack lasting three hours at a hostel in a small Argentine village.

Argentinean media reported that the Israelis were burned, robbed and beaten at the Onda Azul hostel in Lago Puelo, in southern Argentina, between 1 a.m. and 4 a.m. Monday.

The hostel told journalists “They shouted, ‘you f***ing Jews’ and other curses.”

The attackers threw stones and Molotov cocktails at the site, according to Argentinean Radio Continental.

 

JEWISH BOY, 13, ASSAULTED IN ANTI-SEMITIC ATTACK IN PARIS

In the latest of a long line of anti-Semitic attacks in France (most of which are not reported in the international media) a 13-year-old Jewish boy was sprayed in his eye with mace and pepper spray this week in a northeastern Paris suburb, by three young women shouting anti-Semitic slogans.

The victim wore a kippah and tzitzit, making him easily identifiable as Jewish. The victim was blinded, and rushed by passers by to hospital, where the police report said he suffered intense pain for some time. Police say the assailants, who fled the scene and have not yet been apprehended, were of North African appearance.

 

NON-JEWISH SWEDISH JOURNALIST ASSAULTED IN MALMO AFTER DONNING KIPPAH

Swedish TV on Wednesday showed footage of a non-Jewish reporter who walked around Malmo wearing a kippah to test attitudes toward Jews. He was punched in the arm and cursed at by passers-by before cutting short his journalistic experiment out of fear he would be subjected to more serious injury.

Sveriges Television also showed footage of the journalist sitting at a café in central Malmo reading a newspaper, while passersby hurled anti-Semitic abuse at him.

One of the people called him a “Jewish shit” and another told him to “get out of Sweden.”

The experiment was part of a documentary titled “Jew-hatred in Malmo.” The walk was a repeat of a similar walkabout conducted in Malmo in 2013 by journalist Patrick Riley, which I reported on in this list at the time. Unlike in the case of Riley’s report, a Swedish national TV camera crew secretly filmed last month’s experiment.

Immigrants from the Middle East and their children and grandchildren comprise about one quarter of Malmo’s 300,000 population. Only a few hundred Jews remain there.

Local Jewish leaders say the Swedish authorities have not done enough to stop a wave of anti-Semitic attacks mostly perpetrated by Muslims or Arabs.

Following Wednesday’s documentary, some Swedish politicians vowed to do more to protect Sweden’s remaining Jewish population.

The full TV report can be watched here (with English subtitles).

 

ATTACKS ON LONDON JEWS RISE BY 128 %

Hate crimes against Jews in London rose by 128 percent last year, according to official figures released last week by Scotland Yard, the police headquarters of the British capital.

British police said last week that they were increasing patrols in areas with Jewish communities. The British Home Secretary Theresa May, sporting a “Je suis Juif” badge, also vowed last week to do much more to stamp out anti-Semitism.

* See also: “Jewish primary school pupils are taught to dive under desks and lie like ‘sleeping lions’ to survive terror attack” (ITV News)
http://www.itv.com/news/london/2015-01-20/pupils-taught-to-dive-under-their-desks-and-lie-like-sleeping-lions-to-survive-terror-attack/

* See also: “It has been open season on Jews since 9/11: Home Secretary’s solidarity will be seen as an empty gesture unless it is followed up with firm action” by Richard Littlejohn, columnist for The Daily Mail (and a longtime subscriber to this list).

* Even The Morning Star, the official paper of the Communist Party of Great Britain, spoke out against anti-Semitism, in an editorial last week.


STILL SO MUCH TO LEARN

I attach an article I wrote and sent out a year ago to mark last year’s Holocaust Memorial Day. Many people have joined this list since then, so I repeat it here.


Still so much to learn
By Tom Gross
Standpoint magazine (London)
January 2014

http://www.tomgrossmedia.com/mideastdispatches/archives/001426.html

Holocaust Memorial Day falls again on January 27. It is the ninth consecutive year that this (in many ways uniquely) evil event is being officially commemorated in Britain and the EU.

Predictably there are voices – including some Jewish – who say, haven’t we heard enough about the Holocaust? What more is there to learn?

I take the opposite view – that collectively the world has not studied it nearly enough, and has not properly learned its lessons. If it had, anti-Semitism wouldn’t once again be rife in so many countries, including European ones.

And if it had, I don’t think President Assad of Syria could have used chemical weapons to kill 1,429 civilians, including hundreds of children, in a suburb of his own capital last August, without punitive action being taken by the world in response.

But of course Assad’s actions can’t compare in scale and systematic dehumanisation with the genocide carried out by the Nazis and their helpers from every country in Europe (including British subjects in Guernsey and Jersey).

For decades the subject was all but ignored by the film and publishing industries – Elie Wiesel and Primo Levi were among those who struggled to find publishers. Eventually, books were published, films were made, and – decades late – Holocaust museums opened and memorials erected.

And because there are still so many amazing stories to be told there are still more remarkable films being made. In Darkness, released in 2012, about the only group of Jews to survive the war alive in the sewers of Nazi-occupied Europe, was to my mind in some ways even more impressive than Schindler’s List or The Pianist.

Next year’s Cannes Film Festival will see the release of The Zookeeper’s Wife, the true story of Jan and Antonina Zabinski, who saved 300 Jewish adults and children from the Nazis by hiding them in animal cages at Warsaw Zoo, in what has been described as a kind of modern-day “Noah’s Ark”.

And there is so much more we don’t know. How many, for example, know of Chelmno, the first extermination camp set up on European soil, in 1941, which served as a model for later camps? The Nazis killed at least 200,000 Jews there, as they experimented with the most efficient ways to kill en masse. Only three Jews survived Chelmno. Few of the murderers were ever punished.

How many know of Belzec, where Ukrainian SS units, under the command of Germans, murdered 500,000 Jews and only two survived? The lack of survivors is a prime reason why this camp is so little-known, despite the enormous number of victims. But we know exactly what went on there because the Nazis – proud of how many people they were exterminating – kept meticulous records.

How many realise that when Europeans wanted to save their fellow citizens, they often could have done so? For example, in Lithuania, where 95 percent of the country’s Jews were killed – often by Lithuanians working with the Nazis – Jan Zwartendijk, the Dutch representative for Philips’ plants in Lithuania, saved more than 2,000 Jews. He refused to leave when he was recalled, and instead (having persuaded the Dutch government-in-exile to appoint him consul in Kaunas) frantically began issuing exit permits to Jews for the Dutch West Indies.

An orphanage and school in Israel are named after Zwartendijk, but right up to his death in 1976 few were interested in him in his native Holland, and Lithuania only begrudgingly acknowledged his deeds in September 2012.

Or who knows that, while French police were helping the Nazis round up Jews in the rest of France, in the Huguenot village of Le Chambon-sur-Lignon the entire population (under the guidance of the local priest) shielded hundreds of Jews from surrounding villages, hiding them in their homes? Then French President Jacques Chirac only officially recognised the heroism of the town in 2004, and it was not until last summer that a museum commemorating its wartime courage finally opened.

King Abdullah, a feminist? Don’t make me laugh

January 23, 2015

[Notes below by Tom Gross]

I attach several articles on King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, who died today. (I posted these earlier today on my public Facebook page.)

For those pressed for time, I recommend reading at least the first two. The first is a tough critique of the Saudi regime, and the second a good round-up of the sycophantic tributes paid to this despot.

In London, flags are being flown at half-mast on government buildings to mark Abdullah’s death, while there is still silence about the appalling punishment inflicted on human rights hero, Raif Badawi

As Andrew Brown points out in the article below, it is not only Saudis who have suffered: “Saudi’s influence on the outside world is almost wholly malign. The young men it sent to fight in Afghanistan turned into al-Qaida. The Sunni jihadis whom Saudis have funded in Iraq and Syria turned into Isis. It has spread a poisonous form of Islam throughout Europe with its subsidies, and corrupted western politicians and businessmen with its culture of bribery. The Saudis have always appealed to the worst forms of western imperialism: their contempt for other Muslims is as great as any American nationalist’s.”

Abdullah had around 30 wives, 15 sons and 20 daughters, two of have been imprisoned in the palace for the last 13 years.

 

CONTENTS

1. “King Abdullah embodied the wickedness of Saudi Arabia’s regime” (By Andrew Brown, The Guardian, Jan. 23, 2015)
2. “Why is Westminster Abbey honouring the king of a country where Christianity is banned?” (By Ed West, The Spectator, Jan. 23, 2015)
3. “Our ally Saudi Arabia beheaded 10 people this month” (By David Keyes, The Daily Beast, Jan. 18, 2015)
4. “King Abdullah, a feminist? Don’t make me laugh” (By Anne Perkins, The Guardian, Jan. 23, 2015)


“SAUDI’S INFLUENCE ON THE OUTSIDE WORLD IS ALMOST WHOLLY MALIGN”

King Abdullah embodied the wickedness of Saudi Arabia’s regime

Change may be looming for Saudi Arabia, but reforming a country where torture, corruption and judicial murder are commonplace won’t be easy

By Andrew Brown
The Guardian
January 23, 2015

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jan/23/king-abdullah-wickedness-saudi-arabia-regime

We can always look on the bright side of the death of King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia and the accession of Prince Salman. It shows that, if reports of his ill-health are true, dementia can’t stop you reaching the very top – at least if you have the right parents. It is a danger for many political systems that they end up being run by men whose faculties are no longer up to it: think of Pope John Paul II in his long decline, Churchill after his strokes, Ronald Reagan or the Soviet gerontocracy. But Saudi is unique in the modern world in choosing as leader a man believed to be in decline even before he comes to power.

It is a final touch of absurdity in a kingdom that is wicked in itself, and a source of wickedness and corruption elsewhere in the world. Saudi Arabia practices torture and arbitrary judicial murder. Women are beheaded in the street, liberal thought is punishable by flogging, which can be a death sentence even more horrific, because it is more prolonged than having your head hacked off with a sword. It is a raft of fear and hatred lashed together, floating on unimaginable amounts of money, at least for the lucky few. Among the poor, not all of whom are slaves or foreigners, there is tufshan, a special word defined by an anthropologist as “subtle and incapacitating torpor”.

Saudi’s influence on the outside world is almost wholly malign. The young men it sent to fight in Afghanistan turned into al-Qaida. The Sunni jihadis whom Saudis have funded in Iraq and Syria turned into Isis. It has spread a poisonous form of Islam throughout Europe with its subsidies, and corrupted western politicians and businessmen with its culture of bribery. The Saudis have always appealed to the worst forms of western imperialism: their contempt for other Muslims is as great as any American nationalist’s.

But it is very hard to see what reforms might make it better. The example of the Soviet Union shows how chaotic and dreadful the collapse of a totalitarian autocracy can be. Although the Saudis will still have Islam if their state collapses – the Soviets lost their ideology as well their empire – their narrow and puritanical interpretation of Islam can hardly lead to peace. Besides, they face Shia enemies in an arc from Syria in the north, through Iraq and Iran, all the way round to Yemen in the south, where an insurgency is steadily gaining strength; and there is a Shia minority, ruthlessly suppressed, in the kingdom itself.

All these threats must strengthen the apparatus of repression and the belief of the rulers that if they lose their grip they will fall and be trampled in their turn. They may very well be right. It will require a truly wise and skilled leader to navigate what lies ahead. The grovelling tributes paid to the late king by western politicians describe the imaginary Saudi king we need, not those we have had or are likely to get.

 

WHY INDEED?

Why is Westminster Abbey honouring the king of a country where Christianity is banned?
By Ed West
The Spectator
January 23, 2015

http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2015/01/why-is-westminster-abbey-honouring-the-king-of-a-country-where-christianity-is-illegal/

Private Eye will have a field day when it comes to the tributes being paid to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia – it’ll be like beheading fish in a barrel (for adultery). Among the tributes paid to the people’s medieval theocrat was one by David Cameron, who said:

“I am deeply saddened to hear of the death of the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, His Majesty King Abdullah bin Abd Al Aziz Al Saud.

“He will be remembered for his long years of service to the Kingdom, for his commitment to peace and for strengthening understanding between faiths.

“I sincerely hope that the long and deep ties between our two Kingdoms will continue and that we can continue to work together to strengthen peace and prosperity in the world.”

“PS We’re having a special deal on Typhoons [fighter jets] at the moment – 6 for 5. D.C.”

Ok, he didn’t say that last bit.

Then there was Angela Merkel, who said King Abdullah’s policies “brought him and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia respect and recognition. With wisdom, foresight and great personal dedication, he strove for a cautious modernization of his country and for dialogue between the Islamic world and the West.” Considering women still aren’t allowed to drive, I think cautious is a bit of an understatement.

Likewise with the IMG’s Christine Lagarde, who said Saudi King Abdullah was a strong advocate of women “in a very discreet way”.

Indeed – very discreet! As for Tony Blair, who said that the king was a “staunch advocate of inter faith relations”, when they read that out in the office did all they burst out laughing like bad guys in 1980s action films?

I believe in showing respect to the dead but do world leaders have to openly grovel to a country that exports Islamism around the world, whose ideology has poisoned countries like Pakistan and Indonesia, and which has funded Islamist murderers in Syria and Iraq. Abdullah’s kingdom is currently half-way through flogging a man to death for blogging and holds public beheadings for such crimes as witchcraft and homosexuality. So let’s not fall over ourselves here.

The nicest thing that can be said about the Saudi royals is that the alternative would almost certainly be even more ghastly (an alternative created by the Saudis themselves, of course). Most craven of all is the decision by Westminster Abbey to fly a flag at half-mast, a church honouring the leader of a country where conversion to Christianity is a capital offence. It’s appropriate for the Foreign Office in Whitehall to mark the late king’s passing, but for a church to do so, when Saudi treats Christians so badly, is utterly pathetic. If the Saudis despise us for such craven behaviour, they are right to.

Of all the world leaders, the only one who comes out of this well is Iranian president Hassan Rouhani, who said:

“I wish a peaceful rest for the late King, patience for his family and I wish success for the people and the government of Saudi Arabia.”

An appropriate and dignified response to the death of a king.

 

SO MUCH FOR THAT GREAT "REFORMER" ABDULLAH

Our Ally Saudi Arabia Beheaded 10 People This Month
By David Keyes
The Daily Beast
January 18, 2015

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/01/25/epstein-s-first-accuser-tells-her-story.html

American diplomats pay lip service to human rights while tens of billions of dollars in arms are shipped to the Kingdom of Hate, where you can be executed for 'sorcery' or tweeting about Islam.
If there is one point of consensus from the many Middle Eastern freedom fighters I’ve spoken with over the last decade, it is that Saudi Arabia is the root of all evil. Everywhere one looks, the fruits of Saudi-backed extremism are clear.

In the past two weeks, Saudi Arabia beheaded 10 people. Last year it beheaded nearly 90, a sharp spike from 2013. The “crimes” vary but the absurdity of the theocratic judicial system does not. Critique of the king is banned by law. Liberals are flogged, women drivers jailed and dissidents tortured. Saudi religious police ban “tempting eyes” and assert the right to cover any woman’s seductive gaze. Women cannot travel without a man’s permission.

The names of the victims begin to run together and are quickly forgotten. Khaled Johani, jailed for calling for democracy. Amina bint Nasser, beheaded for being a witch. Hamza Kashgari, jailed for questioning Islam on Twitter. Manal al Sharif, imprisoned for driving. Raif Badawy, flogged for opening an online liberal forum. Waleed Abul Khair, locked away for defending rights. Abdul Hamid Al Fakki, head chopped off for sorcery.

Intolerance is Saudi Arabia’s greatest export. The country’s highest religious authority called to burn down all churches in Arabia. Saudi textbooks call Jews the decendents of “apes and pigs.” Christians are forbidden from wearing crosses, building churches or bringing in Bibles.

How does the world react? Total surrender and utter appeasement. Diplomats pay lip service to human rights while tens of billions of dollars in arms are shipped to the Kingdom of Hate. The King is lavished with praise.

The Saudi government, meanwhile, could not get more condescending. They lie through their teeth, confident that no one will lift a finger against them. The Saudi ambassador to the UN, Walid al Muallami, told hundreds of students at New York University that his country had no repression at all and is a “land of opportunity” for everyone. Sure, as long as you’re not gay, a woman, secular, Christian, Jewish, Shiite, liberal, dissident, atheist or a democrat.

No Saudi diplomat should be able to leave his embassy without being confronted with Badawy's name.

One of the main excuses for supporting Saudi Arabia is that they are needed to combat Iran. Relying on one hate-mongering, xenophobic tyranny to combat another is a very bad bet. Iran is undoubtedly one of the most dangerous regimes on Earth and the free world must apply enormous pressure against it, but backing Saudi Arabia is not the answer. Iran can be undermined without relying on the Kingdom of Hate.

I am told over and over that Saudi Arabia has no liberals. It is true that Saudi culture is deeply conservative and liberalism is not exactly teeming over. But what are democracies doing to support those few Saudi democrats who risk life and limb for a more tolerant future? The answer is next to nothing.

The leaders of the free world have abandoned Saudi liberals, but you need not. Raif Badawy’s wife posted on Movements.org, Advancing Human Rights’ new crowd-sourcing platform, to alert the world that her husband could die if the lashes continue. Global pressure led the Kingdom to postpone the lashes. But if his life is to be saved, much more must be done. No Saudi diplomat should be able to leave his embassy without being confronted with Badawy’s name.

Support for Saudi Arabia has come at an enormous cost. Tens of millions of children have been indoctrinated with hatred and bigotry. Extremist groups have been funded throughout the region. Liberals have been viciously cut down. Any semblance of Western credibility has crumbled as democracy activists see unceasing support for one of the most tyrannical regimes on the planet.

Ordinary people around the world should stand in solidarity with Badawy and the many other political prisoners in Saudi Arabia. It is not only a moral duty, it is a strategic opportunity. Empowering Arab liberals and reformers, abandoned for decades, is the only hope for a more stable and peaceful Middle East.

 

KING ABDULLAH, A FEMINIST? DON’T MAKE ME LAUGH

King Abdullah, a feminist? Don’t make me laugh
Christine Lagarde has praised the Saudi despot’s contribution to women’s rights. But his record was dismal and the more we shout about it, the better

By Anne Perkins
The Guardian
January 23, 2015

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jan/23/king-abdullah-feminist-christine-lagarde-saudi-arabia-women

Christine Lagarde, the first woman to head the IMF, has paid tribute to the late King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia. He was a strong advocate of women, she said. This is almost certainly not what she thinks. She even hedged her remarks about with qualifiers like “discreet” and “appropriate”. There are constraints of diplomacy and obligations of leadership and navigating between them can be fraught. But this time there was only one thing to say. Abdullah led a country that abuses women’s rights, and indeed all human rights, in a way that places it beyond normal diplomacy.

The constraints and restrictions on Saudi women are too notorious and too numerous to itemise. Right now, two women are in prison for the offence of trying to drive over the border in to Saudi Arabia. It is not just the ban on driving. There is also the ban on going out alone, the ban on voting, the death penalty for adultery, and the total obliteration of public personality – almost of a sense of existence – by the obligatory veil. And there are the terrible punishments meted out to those who infringe these rules that are not written down but “interpreted” – Islam mediated through the conventions of a deeply conservative people.

Lagarde is right. King Abdullah did introduce reforms. Women can now work almost anywhere they want, although their husband brother or father will have to drive them there (and the children to school). They can now not just study law but practise as lawyers. There are women on the Sharia council and it was through their efforts that domestic violence has been criminalised. But enforcement is in the hands of courts that do not necessarily recognise the change. These look like reforms with all the substance of a Potemkin village, a flimsy structure to impress foreign opinion.

Pressure for change is driven by women themselves, exploiting social media by actions that range from the small, brave actions of defiance – posting images of women at the wheel (ovaries, despite men’s fears, apparently undamaged) – to the large-scale subversive gesture such as the YouTube TV programmes reported by the Economist.

But the point about the Lagarde remarks is that there are signs the Saudi authorities really can be sensitive to the rare criticism that comes from western governments, and the western media. Such protests may yet spare blogger Raif Badawi from further punishment for alleged blasphemy. Today’s lashing has been delayed for the third successive week .The Saudi authorities, like any despotic regime, are trying to appease their critics and contain the pressure for change that social media generates by conceding inch by inch so that, like the slow downhill creep of a glacier, the religious authorities and mainstream social opinion don’t notice it is happening.

But beyond Saudi’s borders, it is surely the duty of everyone who really does believe in equality and human rights to shout and finger point and criticise at every opportunity. Failing to do so is what makes Christine Lagarde’s remarks a betrayal of the women who literally risk everything to try to bring about change in the oppressive patriarchy in which they live. They are typical of the desire not to offend the world’s biggest oil producer and the west’s key Middle Eastern ally, a self-censorship that allows the Saudis to claim they respect human rights while breaching every known norm of behaviour.

Until people like Lagarde abandon the relativist talk that allowed her to claim that Abdullah was a strong advocate for women “in a very discreet way”, or laud the benefits of “gradual” change that is “appropriate” for the country, and simply condemn what should be condemned, millions of women will go on living and dying for want of the most basic rights.


“Je suis Raif Badawi” (& Lebanese writer: “We are all ISIS”)

January 16, 2015

Saudi blogger Raif Badawi with his children, who he may not see again unless pressure is exerted on the Saudi regime

 

Note: The previous two dispatches on the Paris terror attacks were not delivered to some people because of a technical fault. If you would like to read them, there are a number of interesting items here:

* Paris terror mentor’s wife lives for free on UK government benefits (& Muslim saved Jews during supermarket siege)

* The future of free speech?

***

* Please “like” these dispatches on Facebook here www.facebook.com/TomGrossMedia, where you can also find other items that are not in these dispatches.

 

CONTENTS

1. “Je suis Raif Badawi”
2. Hamas student block at Al-Quds University uses U.S. govt. money to incite attacks
3. Jewish schools in Belgium closed; Mossad consulted
4. British MP says Netanyahu attending Paris Jewish memorial made him “sick”
5. ‘Do you want me to finish him off?’ and then he made himself a sandwich
6. Turkish president accuses “the West” of being behind Charlie Hebdo attacks
7. Iran’s Press TV: CIA behind the Paris attacks
8. On France 24, but censored by the BBC
9. Sky News cuts off writer live on air for trying to display Charlie Hebdo
10. Turkey raids paper printing Charlie Hebdo solidarity edition
11. The Charlie Hebdo cartoons no one is showing you
12. “We are all ISIS”
13. “He refused to continue unless all mention of this was wiped from the recording. The BBC team agreed.”
14. ADL: Obama needs to identify who the enemy is, otherwise we’ll lose
15. Cafe owner in London faces death threats over ‘Je suis Charlie’ sign
16. Israel erased from soccer history
17. And on a lighter note…


[Notes below by Tom Gross]

“JE SUIS RAIF BADAWI”

One lone marcher was seen sporting a “Je suis Raif Badawi” sticker at last Sunday’s mass freedom rally in Paris.

Today the young Saudi blogger Raif Badawi who dared call for freedom of speech in Saudi Arabia will be publicly flogged for the second Friday in row to mark the Muslim Holy Day. The whipping takes place after Friday prayers outside a mosque in the Red Sea coastal city of Jeddah.

Badawi was sentenced to 10 years in prison and 1,000 lashes with a whip, to be meted out over 20 consecutive Fridays.

His “crime” was to set up a website titled “Free Saudi Liberals” and call for democratic political reform.

The lack of punitive action by the U.S., Britain or any of Saudi Arabia’s western allies is deafening.

He has also been ordered to pay a fine of 1m Saudi riyals ($266,000), money he doesn’t have.

His case is part of a wider clampdown on dissent by the regime, and is being used as warning to anybody else calling for democracy.

“It is horrifying to think that such a vicious and cruel punishment should be imposed on someone who is guilty of nothing more than daring to create a public forum for discussion,” said Amnesty International in a statement.

Following the sentencing and threats against them, Badawi’s wife and children have been given political asylum in Canada.

His wife says her husband’s frail body may not be able physically to withstand a second round of 50 lashes.

Update: The Saudi authorities have just announced that they have “postponed” the next 50 lashes until next Friday.

 

HAMAS STUDENT BLOCK AT AL-QUDS UNIVERSITY USES U.S. GOVERNMENT MONEY TO INCITE ATTACKS

On January 12, in the wake of the Paris terrors attacks, the Hamas student block at Jerusalem’s Al-Quds University made this video, filmed in the university’s main entrance hall:

Brandeis University (the president of which subscribes to this email list) cut relations with Al-Quds University after this email list posted exclusive photos of a series of Fascistic rallies by students on campus, urging Jews to be killed.

However, America’s Bard college – using U.S. State Department sponsorship money through USAID – continues, in part, to finance Al-Quds University.

***

Update: The university authorities, once again trying to hide their activities from their American and Europe funders, have within the last few minutes (after I posted it on my website) removed the video, but PMW managed to make a back up copy here.

 

JEWISH SCHOOLS IN BELGIUM CLOSED; MOSSAD CONSULTED

For the first time since the Nazi era, Jewish schools in Brussels and Antwerp are closed today due to threats to kill Jewish children.

The decision was made by the Belgium authorities, together with the country’s Jewish communities and reportedly after consultation with the Israeli intelligence agency, the Mossad.

Around 40,000 Jews live in Belgium.

The move comes a day after Belgian police conducted an anti-terror operation in which two jihadists were shot dead in a gun battle in the town of Verviers, near Belgium’s border with Germany.

In nearby Amsterdam, a synagogue and a Jewish school have also been closed today.

In May 2014, an Islamist terrorist, Mehdi Nemmouche, who had also joined jihadist groups in Syria before returning to Europe, killed four Jews at the Brussels Jewish Museum.

In separate anti-terror raids this morning, Germany arrested two suspects said to be plotting an attack, and 12 people were detained in three different French towns on suspicion that they were linked to the Paris supermarket killer.

Hundreds of Berlin police raided 11 residences at dawn, arresting Turkish and Chechen national said to be plotting attacks.

In an unrelated raid, anti-terror police in Wolfsburg, about 200 km west of Berlin, arrested a 26-year-old German-Tunisian dual national this morning.

CNN reported that a Western intelligence source said the ongoing terror threat appears to involve up to 20 sleeper cells of between 120 to 180 people ready to strike in France, Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands. EU and Middle East intelligence agencies identified an “imminent threat” to Belgium.

 

BRITISH MP SAYS NETANYAHU ATTENDING PARIS JEWISH MEMORIAL MADE HIM “SICK”

Calls are being made on the leader of the British Liberal Democrat party to expel its MP David Ward for saying it made him feel “sick” that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was allowed to attend the mass demonstration of unity against terrorism that was held in Paris on Sunday.

Last year, Ward said he would personally join Hamas in firing rockets at Israel’s civilian population. “We utterly condemn David Ward’s comments, they are not representative of the Liberal Democrats,” the party said in a statement at the time. “The party takes this matter very seriously and will treat it as a disciplinary issue.”

And last July, Ward wrote “Am I wrong or are am I right? – how long can the apartheid State of Israel last?”

Previously, Ward had angered the Jewish community by making what many said were anti-Semitic remarks in January 2013, on International Holocaust Memorial Day.

***

By contrast, leading (London) Daily Mail columnist Richard Littlejohn (who is a subscriber to this list) writes:

“What, however, were all those foreign presidents and prime ministers doing there? Showing solidarity is one thing, but this smacked of a synchronised selfie…

“The only foreign dignitary who had genuine reason to be on the march was the Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu. Jews were deliberately targeted by the terrorists in Paris, and Israel is on the frontline of the global jihad.

“It was curious, to say the least, to spot the Palestinian leader in the line-up. Mahmoud Abbas may preach peace, but the Palestinian territories are a haven and a breeding ground for terrorists who share the hardline beliefs of those maniacs who murdered 17 people in France.”

 

‘DO YOU WANT ME TO FINISH HIM OFF?’ AND THEN HE MADE HIMSELF A SANDWICH

The BBC and New York Times have downplayed, in much of their coverage, the fact that in his “martyrdom video,” released by his fellow Islamists after his death, Amedy Coulibaly made it absolutely clear he wanted to kill Jews as Jews and the attack had nothing to with the Palestinians.

And unlike CNN (who have reported this) the BBC failed to mention that the female employee of Charlie Hebdo who was called out by name by the terrorists, who knew she was Jewish, was executed because of this. The terrorists left all the other female staff (none of whom were Jewish) alone.

Last week, former U.S. President Jimmy Carter was provided a platform by the often anti-Israel host of the popular Daily Show to claim that the attacks on Charlie Hebdo were a result of “the Palestinian problem.”

***

In an interview with French publication Liberation, survivors of the kosher supermarket massacre said that Coulibaly was calm and collected as he committed the murders during the horrific seven-hour siege:

“One of the people he shot was still lying on the ground in agony and Coulibaly asked us ‘do you want me to finish him off?’ Then he spent half an hour toying with him before he finally died.”

Coulibaly told his hostages straight away who he was, one survivor said, “that he was the one who killed the policewoman in Montrouge, that he knew the Kouachi brothers well and had served in prison with them.”

“He told us he was doing this in the name of the Islamic State, [talked about] the caliphate and all that.

“I noticed he had a Go Pro with him and a laptop. He took out a memory card, put it in and seemed to be processing some photos on the screen.”

“He also had two AK-47s, two automatic handguns, a knife and some dynamite sticks, Coulibaly said ‘you see, I am well armed.’

“At one point, he browsed the aisles and made himself a little sandwich.

“Then he turned his attention to what was being said in the media, becoming very angry that news channels were not reporting that people were killed during the market take-over.

“‘What do you mean there’s no dead? They’re going to see if there aren’t any dead.’ It was then that he called BFM-TV and told them to change their headline.”

***

Lassana Bathily, 24, of Malian origin, who helped hide Jewish hostages including a three-year-old child, in the freezer, has been awarded French citizenship in recognition for his bravery. He has lived in France since 2006.

***

The four Jewish men who lost their lives in the terror attack were buried in Israel on Tuesday. Among other considerations, it was feared that had they been buried in France, their gravestones would have been defaced by anti-Semites.

In total 6 of the 17 persons killed in the Paris attacks were Jewish. Five of these Jews were from North Africa. The BBC and others didn’t mention this because they may prefer not to let people know there were Jewish refugees from Arab countries – such refugees and their descendants make up over half the Jewish population of Israel. It doesn’t fit the narrative by some journalists at BBC News that Jews and Israelis are not indigenous to the Middle East.

***

In a strongly worded speech to the country’s National Assembly, which has been underreported outside France, French Prime Minister Manuel Valls denounced the “new anti-Semitism”.

You may want to watch it here.

(I have previously noted that Valls has said that some of the “new anti-Semitism” masquerades itself as anti-Zionism.)

 

TURKISH PRESIDENT ACCUSES “THE WEST” OF BEING BEHIND CHARLIE HEBDO ATTACKS

The President of Turkey has suggested French security forces are to blame for the deadly terrorist attacks in Paris last week, alleging the culprits were recently released from French prisons to carry out the massacres.

Recep Tayyip Erdogan accused “the West” of “playing games with the Islamic world,” warning fellow Muslims to be “aware”.

Despite President Barack Obama and British Prime Minister David Cameron having launched their terms of office by making charm offenses towards Erdogan, he has responded with a string of anti-Western and anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, of which this is only the latest.

 

IRAN’S PRESS TV: CIA BEHIND THE PARIS ATTACKS

Iran’s Press TV (which regularly invents things about Israel and the U.S.) reports:

Paris attack designed to shore up France’s vassal status

A former White House official says the terrorist attack that killed 12 people in Paris was a false flag operation “designed to shore up France’s vassal status to Washington.”

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, who was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal, made the remarks in an article published on Thursday.

“The suspects can be both guilty and patsies. Just remember all the terrorist plots created by the FBI that served to make the terrorism threat real to Americans,” he wrote.

He said that the French economy is suffering from the US-imposed sanctions against Russia. “Shipyards are impacted from being unable to deliver Russian orders due to France’s vassalage status to Washington, and other aspects of the French economy are being adversely impacted by sanctions that Washington forced its NATO puppet states to apply to Russia.”

 

ON FRANCE 24, BUT CENSORED BY THE BBC

Drawings of the prophet Mohammed have been made by Muslim artists over many centuries.

But when will the BBC tell viewers and listeners this, as France’s national network France 24 has done, showing such pictures even on its Arabic language service here.

Some years ago, I posted a compilation of some beautiful historic drawings of Mohammed on my website, if you scroll down here.

 

SKY NEWS CUTS OFF WRITER LIVE ON AIR FOR TRYING TO DISPLAY CHARLIE HEBDO

Britain’s international broadcaster Sky News, which is owned by Rupert Murdoch (although he exercises no editorial control) has bowed to the demands of Islamic extremists and cut short an interview with French journalist and feminist Caroline Fourest when she held up a copy of Charlie Hebdo.

Fourest said: “I am very sad, very sad that journalists in the UK do not support us. That journalists in the UK betray what journalism is about. By thinking that people cannot be grown up enough to decide if a drawing is offensive…. [It] is completely crazy that in the UK you cannot show a simple drawing.”

***

Among recent related dispatches: BBC prevents Israeli minister from showing photos of Jewish victims.

 

TURKEY RAIDS PAPER PRINTING CHARLIE HEBDO SOLIDARITY EDITION

NBC News reports that “Police raided the printing plant of a Turkish newspaper [Cumhuriyet] which was producing excerpts of the special edition of French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo… [even though] the Turkish version of the publication did not include any images of Muhammad.”

As I have noted before on this list, Turkey is one of the worst countries in the world for jailing journalists.

However, President Erdogan said in a televised speech to a conference in Ankara in December: “Nowhere in the world is the press freer than it is in Turkey. I’m very sure of myself when I say this. The press is so free in Turkey that one can make insults, slander, defamation, racism and commit hate crimes that are not tolerated even in democratic countries.”

***

Some British universities are also banning Charlie Hebdo. For example, here at Bristol University.

 

THE CHARLIE HEBDO CARTOONS NO ONE IS SHOWING YOU

Here.

 

“WE ARE ALL ISIS”

This important piece has now been translated from the original Arabic and published in the English language version of the Beirut publication Now Lebanon (the editor of which subscribes to this list and sent it to me to share with readers). The editor is a Shia Muslim.


We are all ISIS
These killers are us. They are our religion at its most extreme.
By Nadim Koteich

Condemnations are no longer sufficient. They were never enough in the first place … The people from the Sunni camp of contemporary Islam who carried out the Charlie Hebdo massacre, the Pakistani school massacre before it, the massacres by ISIS in Syria and Iraq, the 9/11 attacks and other atrocities all belong to true Islam. The same applies to the people in the Shiite camp of contemporary Islam who kidnapped and killed foreign journalists in Beirut, and issued and renewed the fatwa that said the blood of British writer Salman Rushdie could be spilt. They are a central part of true Islam and its many schools of jurisprudence.

It doesn’t matter which Islamic text, whether it is a Qur’anic or jurisprudential text, or a text recounting the sayings of the Prophet Mohammad; the killers do not kill for nothing, they kill in the name of books, fatwas, ayahs and age-old tradition. All of these things are inseparable parts of true Islam. They will remain Muslims as long as they pronounce the shahada and as long as the religious institution doesn’t dare to modernize the criteria for being a Muslim.

These killers are us. They are our religion at its most extreme. They are our true Islam taken to its furthest extent and they are not beyond the scripture. If the West says in one united voice “we are Charlie” we should say “we are ISIS.” …

As Muslims, what should we do with the 20th verse of Surat at-Tawbah, which is dedicated to our relationship with Christians and Jews? The text is as follows:

“Fight those who do not believe in God or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what God and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.” …

It was very telling that straight after the announcement of the Charlie Hebdo massacre people’s thoughts turned to Islamist extremists, despite the fact that the French magazine’s satire spared not Judaism, Christianity nor the French political establishment. This is because Islam’s relationship with the present is in crisis, and any group going through such a crisis is always the first suspect. In fact, Islam as a whole stands accused in advance, and not only its extremist fringe. The original texts that form an inseparable part of true Islam and inspire the ongoing crimes committed in its name are also guilty. This will be true as long as there is no central authority to reorganize the relationship between the Islamic text, as a piece of history, and the necessities of the present day, in the same way the Qur’anic text itself acclimatized as the ayahs were gradually sent down, with some new rulings replacing older ones.

The truth is that what the killers did in Paris has only reinforced the images drawn by the artists of Charlie Hebdo. The only difference between the actions of the artists and the killers is that the number of people who follow caricatures is far less than those who followed the international drama caused by the massacre. Nothing can insult Islam and Muslims as much as such crimes, and yet we still make do with saying that they do not represent true Islam, without providing a clear description of what true Islam is, beginning with our religious schools, some of which are factories for crime, to our constitutions which are rigged with the mines of Islamic jurisprudence and Sharia law.

Nothing insults Islam more than the Charlie Hebdo massacre, which says, from the belly of true Islam itself: Those of us who love the Prophet most are our greatest criminals.

Full piece here.

 

“HE REFUSED TO CONTINUE UNLESS ALL MENTION OF THIS WAS WIPED FROM THE RECORDING. THE BBC TEAM AGREED.”

Douglas Murray, writing in the British magazine The Spectator, says:

“The night after the Charlie Hebdo atrocities I was pre-recording a Radio 4 programme. My fellow discussant was a very nice Muslim man who works to ‘de-radicalise’ extremists. We agreed on nearly everything. But at some point he said that one reason Muslims shouldn’t react to such cartoons is that Mohammed never objected to critics.

There may be some positive things to be said about Mohammed, but I thought this was pushing things too far and mentioned just one occasion when Mohammed didn’t welcome a critic. Asma bint Marwan was a female poetess who mocked the ‘Prophet’ and who, as a result, Mohammed had killed. It is in the texts. It is not a problem for me. But I can understand why it is a problem for decent Muslims. The moment I said this, my Muslim colleague went berserk. How dare I say this? I replied that it was in the Hadith and had a respectable chain of transmission (an important debate). He said it was a fabrication which he would not allow to stand. The upshot was that he refused to continue unless all mention of this was wiped from the recording. The BBC team agreed and I was left trying to find another way to express the same point. The broadcast had this ‘offensive’ fact left out.

I cannot imagine another religious discussion where this would happen, but it is perfectly normal when discussing Islam. On that occasion I chose one case, but I could have chosen many others, such as the hundreds of Jews Mohammed beheaded with his own hand. Again, that’s in the mainstream Islamic sources. I haven’t made it up. It used to be a problem for Muslims to rationalise, but now there are people trying to imitate such behaviour in our societies it has become a problem for all of us, and I don’t see why people in the free world should have to lie about what we read in historical texts.”

 

ADL: OBAMA NEEDS TO IDENTIFY WHO THE ENEMY IS OTHERWISE WE’LL LOSE

ADL national director Abe Foxman, who is usually a staunch defender of President Obama, told Haaretz this week:

“If President Obama, refuses to explicitly identify the enemy as ‘radical Islam,’ then it’s a war that can’t be won. If Obama cannot articulate the words ‘radical Islam’, then it’s a lost cause. If we cannot articulate what it is then we won’t be able to deal with it either.”

Many critics on right and left have denounced Obama for his repeated reluctance to identify who carried out attacks, as well as for his decision not to join other world leaders at last Sunday’s rally in Paris, or even to send Vice-President Joe Biden, who has a relatively free schedule.

 

CAFE OWNER IN LONDON FACES DEATH THREATS OVER ‘JE SUIS CHARLIE’ SIGN

Adel Defilaux, who is a French-born Muslim originally from Marseille, has received death threats from other Muslims for displaying a “Je suis Charlie” sign outside his cafe in Brick Lane, a well-known street in East London.

His cafe offers free coffee to the homeless.

 

ISRAEL ERASED FROM SOCCER HISTORY

The official video of the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) showcasing the past winners of the Asian Cup has removed Israel from the pages of the tournament’s history.

The video, “History of the AFC Asian Cup: 1956-2011,” which is on the AFC’s official YouTube channel and was shown at the opening ceremony of the tournament in Melbourne, Australia last week, shows 14 of the 15 previous winners, with only Israel missing. Israel won the cup in 1964.

Australian Jewish groups are calling on the Football Federation of Australia (FFA) to raise the matter with the AFC and the world governing body FIFA.

See also: Football killing fields. International soccer singles out Israel.

 

AND ON A LIGHTER NOTE…

Rhinos escape from snoozing guard at Israeli zoo – video here.


Paris terror mentor’s wife lives for free on UK govt benefits (& Muslim saved Jews during supermarket siege)

January 10, 2015

Two women weeping outside the kosher market where an Islamist terrorist yesterday massacred Jews on the eve of Sabbath in Paris. The Daily Telegraph reveals today that the British government is letting the family of the terrorist mentor of Amedy Coulibaly, who carried out the massacre of Jewish shoppers, live rent free in a four bedroom house in Britain.

 

* Please “like” these dispatches on Facebook here www.facebook.com/TomGrossMedia, where you can also find other items that are not in these dispatches.

 

CONTENTS

1. Son of the Chief Rabbi of Tunis among those killed
2. Muslim employee saved Jews during supermarket siege
3. Offensive images The New York Times wasn’t afraid to publish
4. Charlie Hebdo and Kosher terror mentor’s wife lives rent free in UK
5. 40 percent of all violent racist attacks in France last year were against Jews
6. Some Muslims and Christians adopt the JeSuisJuif hashtag
7. “How dare so many Europeans still wonder why Israel needs to exist”
8. Closed for the first time since the Nazis overran Paris
9. BBC to review Mohammed image ‘ban’
10. 24 front covers from around the world
11. “Islamophobia is a myth”
12. Remembering Ilan Halimi


[Notes below by Tom Gross]

SON OF THE CHIEF RABBI OF TUNIS AMONG THOSE KILLED

The four Jews murdered in cold blood in Paris yesterday have just been named:

Yohan Cohen, aged 22
Yoav Hattab, aged 21
Phillipe Barham, aged in his 40s
François-Michel Saada, aged in his 60s

Several other shoppers at the Kosher supermarket remain hospitalized in serious condition.

Yoav Hattab is the son of the Chief Rabbi of Tunis.

The French authorities respected requests by the Jewish community that the names only be released at the end of the Jewish Sabbath.

Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman said he will travel to Paris this evening to represent Israel at tomorrow’s rally in solidarity with the victims of last week’s attacks in France.

The French community in Tel Aviv said they will hold a candle-lit memorial for the victims of the terror attacks in France, tonight in central Tel Aviv.

 

MUSLIM EMPLOYEE SAVED JEWS DURING SUPERMARKET SIEGE

A Muslim employee of the kosher market (Lassana Bathily, 24,) is being hailed as a hero after he hid people, including a baby, in the freezer during the 7-hour siege. Bathily quietly led people don the stair to the basement and hid them in het freezer.

Several of those held in subzero temperatures needed to receive medical treatment afterwards, but they survived.

 

OFFENSIVE IMAGES THE NEW YORK TIMES WASN’T AFRAID TO PUBLISH

The executive editor of The New York Times, Dean Baquet, has defended his decision not to reprint any Charlie Hebdo cartoons depicting Mohammad (even the most benign ones), by telling Politico: “We don’t run things that are designed to gratuitously offend.”

Not for the first time, a senior New York Times journalist is being less than honest.

Here is one of the vile anti-Semitic cartoons the New York Times has republished, causing great anguish to many Holocaust survivors.

Here is another anti-Semitic cartoon in the New York Times.

The Gawker website (whose owner is a subscriber to this list) has rounded up some further cartoons the New York Times have printed which are highly offensive to African-Americans, Asian people and Christians:

 

CHARLIE HEBDO AND KOSHER TERROR MENTOR’S WIFE LIVES RENT FREE ON UK GOVERNMENT BENEFITS

The British government is reportedly paying the family of the terrorist mentor of Amedy Coulibaly, who executed Jewish shoppers in Paris yesterday. He is also the mentor of one of the Charlie Hebdo killers. (This is comparable to the way they and other European Governments have ended up funding the families of Palestinian terrorists, through misdirected aid to the Palestinian Authority.)

The (London) Daily Telegraph reports today:

“The wife of an al-Qaeda lynchpin who mentored the Charlie Hebdo murderers is living on benefits in Britain after deciding France was too strict against Muslims.

“Sylvie Beghal, a French citizen, lives rent free in a four bedroom house in Leicester after she left her home country with her children in search of a more ‘Islamic environment’.

“She is married to Djamel Beghal, a former London-based lieutenant of Abu Hamza whose teachings are thought to have inspired the Paris attacks. At least two of the suspected gunmen responsible for the killings were Beghal’s disciples, it has emerged.

“… One of the Kouachi brothers, 32-year-old Cherif, was recruited by Beghal in prison ten years ago while both were serving sentences for terror offences.

“Amedy Coulbaly and his girlfriend Hayat Boumeddiene, suspected of murdering a policewoman and holding hostages in a Jewish grocery store, were also mentored by Beghal. According to Le Monde, the pair visited the militant in 2010 in Cantal, southern France, where he was under house arrest.

“… In a court case in the UK Beghal was once described as being so extreme that Osama Bin Laden considered him ‘beyond the pale’.”

 

40 PERCENT OF ALL VIOLENT RACIST ATTACKS IN FRANCE LAST YEAR WERE AGAINST JEWS

I note in one of my dispatches last week, that 7000 Jews had emigrated form France to Israel last year, a record number.

What I didn’t mention is that over 100,000 other Jews made enquiries last year about leaving, according to the Jewish Agency, as anti-Semitic attacks continue on a weekly basis. I have reported about a number of them on this list, but they are generally not reported on outside the Jewish or Israeli media. Some have been particularly horrific – for example, the rape of a woman in her home last month while her boyfriend was locked in the next room by a Muslim gang that told the couple they “wanted to rape a Jew”.

A survey last year found that France had more violent anti-Semitic incidents in 2013 than any other country in the world. Jews were the targets of 40 percent of all racist crimes in France in 2013 – even though they comprise less than 1 percent of the population.

 

SOME MUSLIMS AND CHRISTIANS ADOPT THE JE SUIS JUIF HASHTAG

The hashtag, #JeSuisJuif (I am Jewish), modeled after the #JeSuisCharlie (I am Charlie) hashtag is being used on twitter by a few Muslims and Christians as well as many Jews, reports the Jerusalem Post.

 

“HOW DARE SO MANY EUROPEANS STILL WONDER WHY ISRAEL NEEDS TO EXIST”

For many hours after France’s President Hollande denounced yesterday’s massacre as “an appalling anti-Semitic attack”, many BBC reporters seemed to do everything they could to ignore or downplay the anti-Semitic nature of the attack on the kosher supermarket. It was a well-planned attack and the target was carefully chosen.

The BBC and other media have, once again (as I have pointed out in the past), failed to give any context to the fact that Al-Qaeda almost always picks soft Jewish targets alongside a more military/ governmental / media target -- as they did in the attacks during the last decade in Istanbul, Djerba, Mumbai, Kenya, Morocco, Toulouse and elsewhere. (If you can’t recall this attacks, you can read about them be searching here: http://www.tomgrossmedia.com )

As Douglas Murray (who like Brendan O’Neill, quoted below, is a non-Jewish British subscriber to this list), said yesterday in relation to the attack on the kosher supermarket:

“In France, Belgium and across Europe in recent years, Jews have repeatedly been the targets of Islamist attack. They always are. Last year saw the largest upsurge of anti-Semitic hate crime on record even in the UK.

“In 2008 when Mumbai was attacked, the Islamic terrorists rampaged through that great Indian city. But they specially sought out the tiny Chabad house in Mumbai and there they slaughtered the young rabbi and his wife. It is the same story everywhere.

“The question is this: How dare so many Europeans still wonder why Israel needs to exist. Today Israel is the world’s only really safe haven for Jews who live in a world which cannot keep them safe, even when it wants to.”

 

CLOSED FOR THE FIRST TIME SINCE THE NAZIS OVERRAN PARIS

The Grand Synagogue of Paris was shuttered for Shabbat services for the first time since the Nazis overran France's capital.

Instead of the authorities ordering the synagogue closed, President Hollande should have attended services there as a mark of solidarity.

 

BBC TO REVIEW MOHAMMED IMAGE ‘BAN’

The Huffington Post reports:

BBC To Review Mohammad Image ‘Ban’ After David Dimbleby Claims It Has Policy Against Showing Prophet

The BBC says it is reviewing its editorial guidelines after presenter David Dimbleby claimed the broadcaster has a policy not to depict the prophet - despite the BBC itself showing an image of Muhammad.

The 10pm BBC news programme on Thursday night showed a cover of satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo featuring the prophet Muhammad, as part of its coverage on the murder of 12 people at the magazine’s offices and the manhunt for the suspects that followed.

Yet in the BBC current affairs programme Question Time - aired directly afterwards on BBC One - presenter David Dimbleby said that it was the corporation’s policy not to show images of Muhammad in any form.

 

24 FRONT COVERS FROM AROUND THE WORLD

Here.

 

“ISLAMOPHOBIA IS A MYTH”

Brendan O’Neill (who is a British subscriber to this list) writes yesterday:

Islamophobia Is a Myth
Why do liberals fear the working class and ignore anti-Semitic murder? Because they are bigots.
By Brendan O’Neill
January 9, 2015

He says: “Islamophobia is a myth. Sure, some folks in Europe and elsewhere no doubt dislike Muslims, just as other losers hate the Irish or blacks or women. But the idea that there is a climate of Islamophobia, a culture of hot-headed, violent-minded hatred for Muslims that could be awoken and unleashed by the next terror attack, is an invention. Islamophobia is a code word for mainstream European elites’ fear of their own populations, of their native hordes, whom they imagine to be unenlightened, prejudiced, easily led by the tabloid media, and given to outbursts of spite and violence.”

Full piece here.

Tom Gross adds: Certainly there is some Islamophobia. However, I find it disturbing that almost from the moment that there was an attack by Muslim extremists on the Charlie Hebdo office, the BBC has been interviewing Muslims about how there might be a potential backlash against the Muslim community. But when Jews are held hostage and actually killed in a kosher supermarket, the BBC hardly interviewed anyone about the very real anti-Semitism that is raging across Europe, leading to (in 2014) a record number of Jews fleeing France for Israel, and a record number of anti-Semitic attacks in the UK.

 

REMEMBERING ILAN HALIMI

As the world media still fails to make the link between Islamic extremism and anti-Semitism, it is worth remembering Ilan Halimi.

Ilan Halimi was kidnapped by an Islamist gang who said they wanted to kill a Jew. He was found naked, handcuffed, gagged, hooded and starved, with severe burns, cuts and torture marks all over his body.

http://www.tomgrossmedia.com/IlanHalimi.html

http://www.tomgrossmedia.com/mideastdispatches/archives/000645.html

 

*** The last dispatch was not received by some people because of email problems. You can read and view it here:

The future of free speech?

The future of free speech?

January 07, 2015

 

The above cartoon appeared in The New Yorker in 2012 after a previous attack on Charlie Hebdo.

***

In recent minutes, the BBC have finally reported what other media reported hours ago: that survivors said the gunmen shouted “Allah Akbar” and “we have avenged the prophet” as they shot dead 12 people, including the editor, deputy editor and three cartoonists.

Yet the BBC TV World News anchor went on to ask her interviewee just now: Some would say do you think the cartoonists “overstepped the mark… were those guys asking for trouble?” A frightening future...

***

The gunmen spoke in perfect French. Witnesses said they knew exactly which cartoonists they were targeting. They executed the two police guards as they went in. Their escape was also well-planned, as they swapped cars and got away.

***

There was insufficient action by the authorities after the murderous attack by French Jihadis on the Toulouse Jewish school in 2012, and the Brussels Jewish museum in 2014. Maybe they will address the problem more seriously now. Then EU Foreign Policy Chief Baroness Ashton apologized after appearing to “explain” the murder of the Toulouse Jewish school children.

***

You may also like to read this piece from the Daily Telegraph in London: We must stop blaming ourselves for Islamist terror.

***

This hardly needs saying, but the problem is radical Islam, not Muslims. Indeed, there are reports that one of the policeman shot dead outside the Charlie Hebdo office today was a Muslim.

-- Tom Gross

 

From the (London) Daily Telegraph:


 

UPDATE

22 cartoonists give their response to the shootings.

 

* Please “like” these dispatches on Facebook here www.facebook.com/TomGrossMedia, where you can also find other items that are not in these dispatches.

Number of suicide bombings worldwide doubles in 2014 but none in Israel (& The Guardian hails Israeli president)

January 06, 2015

Israeli President Rivlin has been voted a person of the year by The Guardian

 

There is also another dispatch today which can be read here: Israeli NGO files war crimes charges against Palestinian leaders (& “Netanyahu to hang”).

-- Tom Gross

* Please “like” these dispatches on Facebook here www.facebook.com/TomGrossMedia, where you can also find other items that are not in these dispatches.

 

CONTENTS

1. Wide-ranging poll finds both Jews and Arabs “proud to be Israeli”
2. The Guardian chooses Israeli President Rivlin as a “hero” of 2014
3. Despite Gaza war, tourist numbers to Israel fell only 1% in 2014
4. Egypt Chamber of tourism: Hotel occupancy reached only 12% by New Year
5. Number of suicide bombings around world surged 94% in 2014 but none in Israel
6. U.S. academic group votes against further anti-Israel resolutions
7. Norwegian NGO funds exhibit of children’s maps replacing Israel with Palestine
8. Jews flee France in record numbers to escape anti-Semitism
9. Dieudonne’s supporters turn against him
10. Anti-Semitic acts in UK at 30-year high; BDS activist makes Nazi salute
11. Jewish groups condemn pro-Nazi rallies in Croatia, Ukraine
12. Nazis’ vast, secret “nuclear weapons facility” uncovered in Austria


[Notes below by Tom Gross]

WIDE-RANGING POLL FINDS BOTH JEWS AND ARABS “PROUD TO BE ISRAELI”

The extensive annual poll by the Israel Democracy Institute (a reliable centrist NGO) has found that both Israeli Jews and Arabs are proud to be Israeli. The annual poll is used by both Israel and the international community as a barometer of Israeli public opinion.

This year’s poll found that 86% of Israeli Jews and 65% of Israeli Arabs said they were either “very” or “quite proud” to be Israeli. Only 13% of Jews and 34% of Arabs said they were “not so proud” or “not proud at all” to be Israeli.

When asked which institutions they trusted the most, Israeli Jews said the IDF (88%), the Israeli president (71%) and the Supreme Court (62%).

The least trusted institutions are the Knesset (35%), Chief Rabbinate (29%) and the media (28%).

Among Israeli Arabs, the most trusted institutions are the Supreme Court (60%), the police (57%), the Israeli president (56%) and, perhaps surprisingly, the IDF (51%).

 

THE GUARDIAN CHOOSES ISRAELI PRESIDENT RIVLIN AS A “HERO” OF 2014

The British daily The Guardian, which (unlike the BBC) has been on somewhat of a charm offensive for the past year to try and water down its previously over-the-top criticism of Israel, has included Israeli President Reuven Rivlin in its annual list of “heroes” of the year for 2014. It called Rivlin (a rightist member of the Likud) “Israel’s conscience.”

The paper applauded Rivlin for “standing up for the civil rights of Palestinians” and condemning what The Guardian called “surging bigotry” in Israel.

“Rivlin’s office may be ceremonial; his stand is anything but,” the paper said.

The Guardian pointed to Rivlin’s 2014 Rosh Hashanah video in which he appeared beside an Arab Israeli boy from Jaffa as part of an anti-bullying campaign.

In the video, filmed in the wake of heightened tensions at the end of last summer’s war with Hamas, Rivlin was seen holding up placards denouncing intolerance in Israeli society.

Other “heroes” in The Guardian’s list include Pope Francis.

 

DESPITE GAZA WAR, TOURIST NUMBERS TO ISRAEL FELL ONLY 1% IN 2014

A record 14.2 million passengers passed through Tel Aviv’s Ben Gurion International Airport in 2014.

And the number of foreign visitors to Israel last year declined by just 1% despite the summer war with Hamas and the 24/7 sensational international media coverage of it.

Both before and after the war, tourist traffic was higher than in any previous year, according to the Israel Hotels Association and the Israel Ministry of Tourism.

The largest number of foreign visitors came from the United States, followed by Russia, France, Germany and Britain. Jerusalem was the top destination for visitors, followed by Tel Aviv and the Dead Sea.

Many Russian and other tourists are now avoiding Egypt because of political violence there and have switched their vacations to Israel.

 

EGYPT CHAMBER OF TOURISM: HOTEL OCCUPANCY REACHED ONLY 12% BY NEW YEAR

The Egypt Independent reports.

“Hotel occupancy rates in the cities of Taba and Nuweiba ranged between 6-12 percent by the New Year, except for one hotel whose occupancy reached around 60 percent, according to the Egyptian Federation of Chamber of Tourism.

“Atef Abdel Latif, a member of the federation, said that such rates indicate a catastrophe for hoteliers, as they do not cover their workforce and other costs.”

Tom Gross adds: Political violence between Islamist groups and the Egyptian military continues to rage in Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula, largely unreported in the Western media.

 

NUMBER OF SUICIDE BOMBINGS WORLDWIDE SURGED 94% IN 2014 BUT NONE IN ISRAEL

The number of suicide bombings globally almost doubled last year, according to a comprehensive new report by the Tel Aviv-based Institute for National Security Studies.

At least 3,400 people were killed in such attacks in 2014, compared with 2,200 in 2013. There were 592 suicide bombings, compared with 305 in 2013.

The figures are likely an under-estimate because the INSS said it had been very conservative in assessing suicide bombs in Syria. “Reports from Syria are often based on reports from the organizations behind the attacks, which often exaggerate. The authors say they have included “only attacks whose details could be verified,” the report said.

Most suicide bombs were carried out by Muslims against other Muslims. “The claim [made on the New York Times op-ed page -- TG] that most suicide bombings are carried out against foreign occupiers has been proved false once again,” the INSS says.

Only 3 percent of all suicide bombings were carried out against foreign armies.

The countries with the most suicide bombings in 2014 were Iraq, Yemen, Syria, Lebanon and Libya. There was also a rise in attacks in African countries such as Somalia and Nigeria.

Fifteen suicide bombings in 2014 were carried out by women, compared with five in 2013.

There were no deadly suicide bombings in Israel or the Palestinian territories last year.

 

U.S. ACADEMIC GROUP VOTES AGAINST FURTHER ANTI-ISRAEL RESOLUTIONS

Bucking the trend of American academics voting for various (largely symbolic) boycotts of Israel, the American Historical Association has voted 144 to 55 against any further pursuit of resolutions that denounce Israel.

The Jerusalem Post reports: “The American Historical Association, a scholarly group, declined to put two resolutions critical of Israel to a vote at its annual meeting in New York over the weekend, one year after the American Studies Association joined an academic boycott of Israel.”

The Jerusalem Post points out: “There was no mention of incitement on Palestinian campuses in the resolutions. Last year, hundreds of masked protesters marched through Al-Quds University’s campus wearing black ski masks and carrying replicas of rockets, according to photos posted on the website of independent journalist Tom Gross and on the Facebook page of the Islamic Bloc of Al-Quds University student group, which is associated with Hamas.

“A rally in support of Islamic Jihad on the Al-Quds campus in November 2013 led to the suspension of ties between Al-Quds University and Brandeis University.

“A professor at the Palestinian university quit following a campaign of harassment and death threats after he took students to visit the Auschwitz death camp in Poland last year.”

 

NORWEGIAN NGO FUNDS EXHIBIT OF CHILDREN’S MAPS REPLACING ISRAEL WITH PALESTINE

The Norwegian People’s Aid NGO, which is funded by the Norwegian Foreign Ministry and the Canadian International Development Agency, has produced maps for Middle East schoolchildren that replace Israel with “Palestine”.

Another map displays the Israeli cities of Beersheba, Acre, Haifa and Safed as being in Palestine.

http://borjcamp.com/?p=46522

Last week, a subsidiary of U.S. publisher Harper Collins apologized after omitting Israel from maps in its Middle East Atlas. It said it would withdraw remaining copies from sale and pulp the rest.

 

JEWS FLEE FRANCE IN RECORD NUMBERS TO ESCAPE ANTI-SEMITISM

For the first time since Israel’s independence in 1948, France topped the list of countries from which immigrants moved to Israel. At least 7,000 French Jews moved to Israel last year, double the number in 2013. The Times of London reported that many cited a wave of anti-Semitic attacks in France as the reason for their move.

 

DIEUDONNE’S SUPPORTERS TURN AGAINST HIM

Updating previous dispatch notes about the French anti-Semitic “comedian”:

Some black supporters of Dieudonné, the black, anti-Semitic “comedian” who invented a new form of “Nazi” salute to avoid prosecution under laws banning race hate, have turned against him. They are unhappy with his increasingly close connections with white, racist, groups in France. Dieudonné is cozying up to leading white French anti-Semites, such as Alain Soral, who hates black people almost as much as he hates Jews.

When BBC Newsnight interviewed Soral in an item about Dieudonne they simply called Soral a “filmmaker” and failed to mentioned who he really is.

 

ANTI-SEMITIC ACTS IN UK AT 30-YEAR HIGH; BDS ACTIVIST IN UK MAKES NAZI SALUTE

Anti-Semitic incidents in Britain are at their highest level since comprehensive records began to be collated 30 years ago, reports the (London) Daily Telegraph.

The Community Security Trust reports that there were over 1,000 anti-Semitic incidents in 2014, including 302 in July alone, when in the midst of the Gaza conflict, many anti-Israel protests quickly turned anti-Semitic.

Last month, the director of BBC TV, Danny Cohen said he has never felt so uncomfortable being a Jew in Britain as in 2014. For more (including my quote) see here.

Last week, Tristan Woodwards, a leading British activist of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign was pictured giving a Nazi salute outside the Israeli-owned Kedem cosmetics store on King Street, in the center of the northern English city of Manchester.

 

JEWISH GROUPS CONDEMN PRO-NAZI RALLIES IN CROATIA, UKRAINE

Jewish groups have strongly condemned the memorial mass held in the center of Zagreb to commemorate Croatian war criminal Ante Pavelić, the so-called “Hitler of the Balkans”.

Pavelić, the founder of the Ustasha, oversaw the murder of hundreds of thousands of Jews, Roma and Serb civilians in World War Two. Many were subjected to horrific torture before being killed, including Jewish babies who were thrown in the air and shot in front of their parents. At least 100,000 were murdered in Jasenovac, the so-called “Auschwitz of the Balkans.”

Leading Nazi-hunter Efraim Zuroff, said: “It is hard to believe that in the center of the capital of a member of the European Union, very close to Zagreb’s Jewish community, hundreds of people gathered yesterday to commemorate the memory of one of Europe’s biggest mass murderers. Such a ceremony is an insult to the memory of Pavelić’s hundreds of thousands of innocent victims. It is also a badge of shame for the Catholic Church, which allowed such a ceremony to take place in the Basilica of the Heart of Christ.”

After the war, Pavelic escaped to Argentina with the help of the Austrian bishop Alois Hudal. He was wounded in an assassination attempt in 1957, and died in Madrid two years later while under the protection of the Franco regime.

***

Jewish groups have also condemned the pro-Fascist marches in Ukraine on January 1.

A new year’s torchlight parade organized by the Fascist Svoboda party honored the Holocaust era-Ukrainian ultra-nationalist leader Stepan Bandera. The rally took place in Khreshchatyk Street, one of Kiev’s main boulevards and the site of some of last year’s EuroMaidan revolution, to celebrate the 106th birthday of Stepan Bandera, whose faction of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists helped murder tens of thousands of Jews during the Second World War.

Bandera escaped after the war and was assassinated in Munich in 1959.

 

NAZIS’ VAST, SECRET “NUCLEAR WEAPONS FACILITY” UNCOVERED IN AUSTRIA

A huge, secret, underground Nazi weapons factory, believed to have been built for the development and planned manufacture of nuclear weapons and other WMDs, has been uncovered in Austria, London’s Sunday Times reported two days ago.

The vast weapons facility was uncovered last week near the town of St. Georgen an der Gusen by a team led by Austrian documentary-maker Andreas Sulzer, who said it was “likely the biggest secret weapons production facility of the Third Reich.” The 75-acre industrial complex is located close to a second subterranean factory, the B8 Bergkristall facility where the Messerschmitt Me 262, the world’s first operational jet-powered fighter, was produced toward the end of World War II.

“Declassified intelligence documents as well as testimony from witnesses helped excavators identify the concealed entrance,” the Sunday Times said.

“The facility, like the Bergkristall factory, relied on slave labor from the nearby Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp,” the Sunday Times added. “Up to 320,000 inmates are said to have died because of the brutal conditions in the subterranean labyrinth.”

“Prisoners from concentration camps across Europe were handpicked for their special skills – physicists, chemists or other experts – to work on this monstrous project,” Sulzer told the British newspaper, “and we owe it to the victims to finally open the site and reveal the truth.”

Sulzer, whose work is being partly funded by German state TV network ZDF, is also seeking to establish what became of SS General Hans Kammler, who managed the project and reported to SS chief Heinrich Himmler.

“Rumors persist that he was captured by the Americans and given a new identity after the war [and taken to the U.S. to help work on programs there],” the paper reported.

Israeli NGO files war crimes charges against Palestinian leaders (& “Netanyahu to hang”)

Santa is chased out of a Turkish town

 

There is also another dispatch today which can be read here:

Number of suicide bombings worldwide doubles in 2014 but none in Israel (& The Guardian hails Israeli president).

-- Tom Gross

* Please “like” these dispatches on Facebook here www.facebook.com/TomGrossMedia, where you can also find other items that are not in these dispatches.

 

CONTENTS

1. Israeli NGO files war crimes charges against Palestinian leaders at ICC
2. Fatah: Netanyahu will hang “soon”
3. Fatah distances itself from latest “genocidal, anti-Semitic” Facebook post
4. Why June 13? Because they kidnapped the teens on June 12
5. “Palestine to join Interpol”
6. Iran claims to “builds world’s first missile-evading drone”
7. Egypt threatened to arrest George Clooney’s wife
8. Saudi Airlines reportedly plans to segregate sexes
9. Ayatollah compares Ferguson, Gaza; Iran police arrest 50 women for “un-Islamic” dress
10. Hamas condemns shooting of Gazan teen by Egyptian guards
11. “Female slavery the biggest honor for non-Muslim women, says jihadist”
12. Santa chased out of Turkish town in anti-New Year’s celebration


[Notes below by Tom Gross]

ISRAELI NGO FILES WAR CRIMES CHARGES AGAINST PALESTINIAN LEADERS AT ICC

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’s controversial move last week to join the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, and seek to prosecute Israelis there, has also exposed Palestinian leaders to war crime charges. And an Israeli NGO Shurat HaDin (“the Israel Law Center”) is doing just that.

Yesterday Shurat HaDin filed lawsuits at the ICC against three Palestinian Authority leaders – Prime Minister Rami Hamdallah, Abbas’s deputy; minister Jibril Rajoub, and intelligence chief Majed Faraj – for “war crimes, terrorism and human rights offenses”.

All three are members of Abbas’s Fatah party and serve in his regime.

The Israeli NGO pointed out that during last summer’s Israel-Gaza conflict, “Fatah openly boasted in media channels that it launched rockets that caused the injury and death of Israeli civilians – a war crime under international law.”

(Tom Gross: Most rocket attacks from Gaza came from Hamas or Islamic Jihad, but Fatah also launched rockets at Israeli civilians from Gaza.)

“Abbas and his friends in terror organizations believe that the courts can be used as a weapon against Israel, while at the same time, the Palestinian leadership carries out crimes with utter impunity against their own people and against Israeli civilians,” Shurat HaDin’s chairwoman, attorney Nitsana Darshan-Leitner said.

The case brought against the three Palestinians leaders lists widespread torture and killings of Palestinian civilians who dare to oppose Abbas’s authoritarian rule.

The ICC can prosecute individuals accused of crimes against humanity, war crimes and genocide, committed since July 1, 2002, when the court’s founding treaty, the Rome Statute, came into force.

 

FATAH: NETANYAHU WILL HANG “SOON”

The Western-backed and funded Palestinian Fatah party has suggested that the democratically elected prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, will be hanged by the International Criminal Court.

You can see a montage of Netanyahu with a noose dangling in front of him produced on the official Facebook page here:

http://palwatch.org/main.aspx?fi=157&doc_id=13603

The image of the noose and Netanyahu, together with the logo of the ICC, also appears on the official Fatah website with the phrase “coming soon.”

Israel has long accused Palestinian groups, including the governing Fatah party, of inciting to kill Israelis and Jews.

 

FATAH DISTANCES ITSELF FROM LATEST “GENOCIDAL, ANTI-SEMITIC” FACEBOOK POST

Following criticism on CNN, Fatah has distanced itself from an image of skulls adorned with Jewish stars of David that was post to its Facebook page.

The image, posted last week to mark Fatah’s 50th anniversary, displayed a rifle, the Fatah flag and the words “lingering on your skulls.” It showed a pile of skulls marked with Jewish stars of David.

But after a CNN anchor asked a Fatah spokesman about the image on Friday, Fatah distanced itself from it in a statement (in English though not in Arabic). Unsurprisingly, the BBC hasn’t reported on this at all.

As reported in previous dispatches last year, Fatah was criticized after the kidnapping and subsequent murder of three Israeli teenagers last summer, when its webpage displayed a cartoon depicting the kidnapped teens as rats caught on a fishing line.

You can see the cartoon here: Fatah mocks kidnapped boys as rats (while Abbas’s wife treated in Israeli hospital) (June 16, 2014).

 

WHY RETROACTIVE TO JUNE 13? BECAUSE THEY KIDNAPPED THE TEENS ON JUNE 12

This leading blogger points out:

http://elderofziyon.blogspot.co.il/2015/01/why-is-palestines-icc-application.html#.VKt_c2TF-QM

“Here is the letter from Mahmoud Abbas to the ICC. Why is the application requesting it to be effective retroactively to June 13, 2014?

“Because on June 12, 2014, Palestinian terrorists kidnapped and murdered three Israeli teens, Naftali Fraenkel, Gilad Shaer, and Eyal Yifrah, which is a war crime under the Rome Statute…

“The exact same thing was done by William Schabas, chair of the UNHRC investigation into the events of last summer – a mandate that explicitly excludes the kidnapping of the three Israeli teens but that includes Israel’s response to the kidnappings by choosing to only investigate events from June 13th.”

**

Tom Gross adds: Members of Congress say that using their tax-money to introduce war crimes charges at the ICC against America’s Israeli allies, may be the last straw and that they will soon stop Washington’s annual $400 million aid to the Palestinian Authority.

* Firebomb attack victim Ayala Shapira (aged 11), who I referred to in a previous dispatch, has woken up and has been able to speak with her family. She was critically wounded in a firebomb attack just before Christmas, while she was returning home after an extra-curricular math class. Her condition remains life-threatening such is the extent of her burns, according to doctors.

 

“PALESTINE TO JOIN INTERPOL”

The Palestinian Maan News Agency reports that “Palestinian authorities have decided to join the International Criminal Police Organization, widely known as Interpol, an official revealed Saturday.”

Some observers have expressed surprise that the Palestinian Authority wants to join the world’s prime organization for fighting cross-border crimes and terrorism, pointing out that arrest warrants may be issued against Palestinian officials and fugitive Palestinian terrorists.

 

IRAN CLAIMS TO “BUILDS WORLD’S FIRST MISSILE-EVADING DRONE”

Iran’s Fars news agency (FNA) claimed yesterday that:

“An Iranian expert has built the world’s first missile-evading drone with a self-destructive capability for dangerous situations.

“‘Given the daily progress of drones as well as the increased missile power to destroy them, a missile-evading drone was designed and built for the first time in the world which can escape thermal and air-to-air missiles and no missile can approach the drone any closer than 250 meters,’ Hassan Akbari Layeq who has built the ‘Sarallah Drone’ told FNA on Sunday.

“He said the drone is equipped with a deceptive system and can speed up and escape incoming missiles, ‘And this is the first time that this technology has been designed and used for a 4-kilogram drone.’”

Full report here.

Tom Gross adds: Reports by the Fars News Agency are not always accurate.

Editors at Fars also appear to read these dispatches and have quoted from them in the past, as well as reproducing this interview with me here:

http://www.tomgrossmedia.com/mideastdispatches/archives/001196.html

http://www.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=9002230446.

 

EGYPT THREATENED TO ARREST GEORGE CLOONEY’S WIFE

The wife of film star George Clooney, British-Lebanese lawyer Amal Alamuddin, has revealed that in 2013 the Egyptian authorities threatened to arrest her over her criticism of the country’s justice system. She had criticized Egypt for legal flaws that led to the jailing of three al-Jazeera journalists.

As I have noted before in these dispatches, al-Jazeera’s Egyptian-Canadian bureau chief in Cairo, Mohamed Fahmy, Australian citizen Peret Greste, and Egyptian freelance producer Baher Mohamed, are all imprisoned in Egypt on what are widely believed to be trumped-up, politically motivated terrorism charges.

They were sentenced to between seven and ten years in prison but last week, under international pressure, Egypt’s highest court ordered a retrial.

Mrs. Clooney wrote in relation to other Egyptians sentenced to death: “Sentencing a political opponent to death after a show trial is no different to taking him out on the street and shooting him. In fact, it is worse because using the court system as a tool of state repression makes a mockery of the rule of law.”

 

SAUDI AIRLINES REPORTEDLY PLANS TO SEGREGATE SEXES

Saudi Arabia’s state-run airline has decided to impose separate seating on its male and female passengers, according to reports in the Arab media.

The plan is being implemented due to an increase in complaints from men who said they did not want their wives sitting next to other men, the Saudi daily, Ajel, and the Emirates 24/7 news website reported. According to the reports, only close relatives will be allowed to sit together.

A spokesman for Saudi Airlines said the story “had been taken out of context” and no decision had been made yet.

Saudi women are not employed as flight attendants by the airline, which instead hires women from other countries.

Saudi Arabia famously forbids women from driving motor vehicles. In public spaces such as restaurants, beaches, amusement parks or banks, women are required to enter and exit through special doors. And women who are seen socializing with a man who is not a relative can even be charged with committing adultery, fornication or prostitution.

(In the past, I have written on Saudi Arabia. For example, here, after the 9/11 attacks:

Time to face up to Mecca: Why wasn’t Saudi Arabia on Bush’s Axis of Evil? (February 8, 2002))

 

AYATOLLAH COMPARES FERGUSON, GAZA

Last week, Iranian Ayatollah Ali Khamenei used his English-language Twitter page to criticize the United States’ treatment of Native Americans and African Americans, highlighting the recent events in Ferguson, Missouri.

Among his tweets:

“Was it not colonialists who killed Native Americans& enslaved millions of Africans?Are these American values? #Ferguson #WoundedKnee”

“If #Jesus were among us today he wouldn't spare a second to fight the arrogants&support the oppressed.#Ferguson #Gaza”

***

IRANIAN POLICE ARREST 50 WOMEN FOR “UN-ISLAMIC” DRESS

“Morality police” have stepped up their arrests of women in Tehran for wearing “immodest dress”, arresting 50 women just last week, according to reports from the Islamic Republic.

The Islamic code was established by Ayatollah Khomeini in 1981. It orders women to cover all body parts except the face and wrists.

Many Iranian women have defied it over the years and some have lately started wearing high heeled boots with tight leggings, enraging regime hardliners.

Among related past dispatches, please see:

Happy in Gaza (& arrested for being happy in Tehran) (& Disabled Saudi tweet) (May 22, 2014).

 

HAMAS CONDEMNS SHOOTING OF GAZAN TEEN BY EGYPTIAN GUARDS

Hamas on Saturday condemned the fatal shooting by Egyptian border guards of a Palestinian minor on the Gaza border.

An Egyptian security official said that troops opened fire on Gazans who had illegally crossed into the Sinai, where the army has created a buffer zone to prevent the movement of Gaza-based militants.

“Soldiers charged with protecting the frontier fired at six Gazans, of whom three succeeded in returning to Gaza while three were arrested. One was probably hit by the fire,” an official said.

Gaza emergency services spokesman Ashraf al-Qudra said that 17-year-old Zaki al-Houbi was killed. The Egyptians shot him “in the back and the bullet settled in the heart. He died on the spot,” he told AFP.

 

“FEMALE SLAVERY THE BIGGEST HONOR FOR NON-MUSLIM WOMEN, SAYS JIHADIST”

The Australian (one of Australia’s main papers) reports (January 2, 2015)

“An Australian Islamic State fighter who has been used in a propaganda video has claimed non-Muslim women are ‘used and abused’ and should become slaves as it would be ‘the biggest honor for them’…

“The comments were made after Islamic State forced women and children of the Yazidi ­religious sect to be slaves who are often subjected to rape.

“At least four Australian fighters have been identified as having Yazidi slaves, and horrific stories of their treatment – including sexual abuse – have emerged in recent weeks…”

Tom Gross adds: Extreme Islamists point to verses in the Koran that seem to imply that Muslim men can take “captive … wives unto whom thou hast paid their dowries, and those whom thy right hand possesseth of those whom Allah hath given thee as spoils of war”.

 

SANTA CHASED OUT OF TURKISH TOWN IN ANTI-NEW YEAR’S CELEBRATION

Hurriyet Daily News, one of Turkey’s main papers, reports:

“Amid increasing anger at official and popular levels at the supposed Christian aspects of New Year’s celebrations in Turkey, members of the far-right Great Unity Party (BBP) symbolically ran Santa out of town Dec. 31 in the northwestern province of Bolu.”

Photo here.